<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">GEP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4336</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/gep.2016.41003</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">GEP-62396</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Correlations between Geo-Chemical Speciation of Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, Pb, Cd and Ni) in Surface Sediments and Their Concentrations in Giant Mudskipper (&lt;i&gt;Periophthalmodon schlosseri&lt;/i&gt;) Collected from the West Coast of Peninsular Malaysia
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ijjani</surname><given-names>Rufa’i Buhari</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ahmad</surname><given-names>Ismail</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Biological Science, Northwest University, Kano, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>trbuhari@yahoo.com(IRB)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>25</day><month>12</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>28</fpage><lpage>36</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>1</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>27</month>	<year>December</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>30</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Surface sediments and giant mudskipper (
  Periophthalmodon schlosseri) were collected in August and September 2008 and in March and June 2010 from six sampling sites in the west coast of Peninsular Malaysia to assess heavy metals accumulation in the giant mudskipper. Sequential extraction technique was used to fractionate the sediments into four different geo-chemical fractions; easily, freely or leachable and exchangeable (EFLE), acid reducible, oxidizable organic and resistant fractions. Heavy metals concentrations (Cu, Zn, Pb, Cd and Ni) in the surface sediments and giant mudskipper were determined by using air acetylene flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS) Perkin Elmer Analyst 800. The results of Pearson’s correlation analyses showed that metal concentrations in the tissues of 
  P. schlosseri were significantly correlated (
  p &lt; 0.01 or 
  p &lt; 0.05), correlations were observed between Cu in 
  P. schlosseri and Cu in the sediment (oxidisable-organic, resistant and total Cu), Zn in 
  P. schlosseri and Zn in the sediment (EFLE and total Zn), Pb in 
  P. schlosseri and Pb in the sediment (with all the four fractions of Pb), Cd and Ni in 
  P. schlosseri and Cd and Ni in the sediment (with all fractions of Cd and Ni except acid-reducible Cd and Ni) which might suggest the use of 
  P. schlosseri as a biomonitoring agent for heavy metals pollution in the west coast of Peninsular Malaysia.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Surface Sediments</kwd><kwd> Heavy Metals</kwd><kwd> Geo-Chemical Speciation</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;Periophthalmodon schlosseri&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> West Coast of Peninsular Malaysia</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Rapid socio-economic growth and industrialization in the coastal area has led to the discharged of heavy metals into aquatic environments and their accumulation in sediments and living organisms to a toxic level. The pollution of aquatic systems had become a major concern worldwide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref1">1</xref>] (Abdel-Baki, Dkhil, and Al-Quraishy, 2013). Sediment-associated metals pose a direct risk to detrital and deposit-feeding benthic organisms, and may also represent long-term sources of contamination to higher tropic levels [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref2">2</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref5">5</xref>] . The bioavailability and subsequent toxicity of the metals are dependent upon various kinds and amounts of the metals bound to the sediment matrices (metal speciation) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref6">6</xref>] . It had been found that the speciation of a metal, rather than its total concentration, is the key to understand its eﬀect on the biota [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref7">7</xref>] (Allen and Hansen, 1996), as well as its biogeochemical transformation and ultimate fate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref8">8</xref>] (Billon et al., 2002). Increased discharge of both essential and non-essential metals into natural aquatic ecosystems could expose aquatic organisms to unnaturally high levels of these metals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref9">9</xref>] (Van Dyk et al., 2007), thereby causing adverse effects on aquatic ecosystem. If these metals were taken up excessively, they might be detrimental to aquatic organisms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref10">10</xref>] (Chourpagar &amp; Kulkarni, 2011). Many biomonitoring agents for heavy metals were proposed in the west coast of Peninsular Malaysia but the use of mudskippers in the biomonitoring of Malaysian coastal environments had not received much attention like other biota. Mudskippers were peculiar-looking amphibious fishes that were characteristic for mangrove forests and mudflats [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref11">11</xref>] (Kruitwagen, 2007); that were able to accumulate metals. Considering the continuous input of heavy metals in coastal environment (mudflat areas) and function of mudskipper as key specie in intertidal mudflat area, correlation between concentrations of heavy metals in different sediment fractions and tissues of giant mudskipper P. schlosseri levels could give better information on the bioavailable metals in sediments. The objectives of the present study was to assess the bioaccumulation of Cu, Zn, Pb, Cd and Ni in giant mudskipper P. schlosseri and their correlations with different geochemical fractions of sediments.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>Samplings were conducted in August 2008 to June 2010. A total of six sampling sites were selected for surface sediments and giant mudskipper P. schlosseri in the west coast of Peninsular Malaysia (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><p>The coordinates of sampling sites were recorded with Global positioning system (Garmin OREGON 45OT 850 MB waterproof GPS). Description of each sampling site was given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Top 3 - 5 cm surface sediments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref13">13</xref>] (Ismail, 1993; Zulkifli et al., 2010) were collected in triplicates from three different points within a certain area (approximately 1 meter radius) from each sampling site using plastic scoop and placed in separate labelled polyethylene plastic bags. Each sediment sample was instantly placed in ice and transported to the laboratory until further analysis.</p><p>Sediment samples were dried in the laboratory using an air-circulating oven to a constant dry weight at 80˚C. The dried sediment samples were crushed to powder by using a porcelain mortar and pestle then sieved vigorously to produce homogeneity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref12">12</xref>] (Ismail, 1993), through a 63 &#181;m stainless steel aperture sieve. Geochemical fractions of Cu, Zn, Pb, Cd and Ni in the sediments were determined by modified sequential extraction technique (SET) as described by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref14">14</xref>] Badri and Aston (1983) and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref15">15</xref>] Tessier and Campbell (1987).</p><p>The four-step extraction procedure of sediment handling and analysis employed using SET was described as: 1) easily, freely or leachable and exchangeable (EFLE) (Fraction 1); 2) acid reducible (Fraction 2); 3) oxidisable organic (Fraction 3) and; 4) resistant fractions (Fraction 4). The mathematical summation of the first three types of fractions constitutes the “non-resistant phase which is closely related to anthropogenic inputs” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref14">14</xref>] (Badri and Aston, 1983).</p><p>The residue used for each fraction was weighed before the next fractionation was carried out. The residue was rinsed with 20 mL DDW, filtered through a Whatman&#174; No. 1 filter paper, and the filtrate stored until metal determination. For each fraction of the sequential extraction procedure, a blank was employed using the same</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Map of west coast of Peninsular Malaysia showing six sampling sites (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2170099x7.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Description of sampling sites in the west coast of Peninsular Malaysia</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >No.</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Description of sampling sites</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sampling site</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coordinates</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Site description</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sengantang Garam, Kedah</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >05˚39.552'N 100˚23.983'E</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jetty, aqua cultural area and paddy field</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Kuala Juru, Penang</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >05˚19.683'N 100˚22.949'E</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Industrial area</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sungai Puluh, Klang</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >03˚04.786'N 101˚23.903'E</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jetty receiving domestic wastes and industrial area</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bagan Lalang, Selangor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >02˚36.669'N 101˚41.100'E</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Recreational and agricultural areas</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Minyak Beku, Johor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01˚47.746'N 102˚53.395'E</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jetty receiving domestic wastes and shipping activities</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sungai Tiga, Johor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >01˚25.841'N 104˚00.281'E</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Jetty, agricultural and oil plantation</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>procedure to ensure that samples and chemicals used were free of contaminations.</p><p>Fish were collected using trap net at almost the same locations were the sediments were collected and placed in a plastic aquarium containing some sediment and water. The fish samples were brought to the laboratory; stomach and intestines were emptied and dissected immediately or put in labelled plastic bags and kept in deep freeze at −20˚C until further analysis. In the laboratory, fish samples were removed from the refrigerator and plastic bags, rinsed with DDW then thawed at room temperature. About 10 P. schlosseri from each sampling sites with the recorded body length (mm) and weight (g) were dissected on clean plastic material using stainless steel kits and glass equipment. The dissected parts were pooled into eight different parts namely; scales, muscle, bone, gills, operculum, intestine, liver and cartilage. All the eight parts were dried at 80˚C according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref16">16</xref>] (Mucha et al., 2003) until a constant dry weight.</p><p>Sample of each dried part was weighed separately (0.5 - 1.0 g) in triplicate and placed in digestion tubes. To each digestion tube 10 ml concentrated nitric acid (Anala R grade, BDH 69%) was added and placed in a hot block digester unit at 40˚C for 1 hour. The temperature was then increased to 140˚C for at least three hours [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref12">12</xref>] (Ismail, 1993). The digested samples were diluted to 40mL with double distilled water (DDW). The samples were then filtered through filter papers into pill box and the filtrate was stored until metal determination.</p><p>The filtrates obtained from sediments and biological samples were determined for Cu, Zn, Pb, Cd and Ni by using an air-acetylene flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS) Perkin Elmer Analyst 800. Standard solutions were prepared from 1000 mg/L stock solution of each metal (BDH SpectrosoL).</p><p>The wavelengths for each metal were 324.8, 213.9, 283.3, 228.8 and 232.0 nm for Cu, Zn, Pb, Cd and Ni respectively. The data were presented in &#181;g/g dry weight. Multiple-level calibration standards were analysed to generate calibration curves against which sample concentrations were calculated.</p><p>During the period of AAS metal analysis, a quality control sample was routinely included for every 5 - 10 samples. Procedural blanks and quality control samples made from standard solutions for Cu, Zn, Pb, Cd and Ni were analyzed after every 5 - 10 samples to ensure the sensitivity and recovery of the instrument used.</p><p>The procedures of quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) were employed to ensure the validity of the analytical data [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref17">17</xref>] (Ismail et al., 2004). All plastics and glassware used were washed with detergent, Deacon 90, rinsed with double-distilled water and soaked in 10% HNO3 for at least 24 hrs, then rinsed with double- distilled water and allowed to dry at room temperature. The QA and QC were controlled by procedural blanks, sample replicates and certified reference material (CRM).</p><p>The quality of the method was checked with a certified reference material (CRM) for soil from International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Soil-5, Vienna; Austria and Dogfish liver DOLT-3 from National Research Council Canada (NRCC) were analyzed. These were checked to accuracy of the digestion method with the certified values supplied by the IAEA and NRCC. To ensure the sensitivity of the Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (AAS) and generate calibration curves against which sample concentrations were calculated. The results of similar digested samples analyzed for Cu, Zn, Pb, Cd, and Ni by the flame AAS Perkin Elmer. An analyst 800 showed acceptable recoveries of the metals; about 94% - 107% for soil and 87% - 110% for dogfish liver. All statistical analyses of data were carried out using SPSS statistical package programs version 17.</p><p>Data were tested for the basic assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance in exploratory data analysis in SPSS 17. Correlation statistics were used to obtain the correlation between metal contents measured in the sediments and P. schlosseri tissues selected from matched sampling sites.</p><p>The significance of these correlations was tested using Pearson correlation coefficient at 95% (p &lt; 0.05) and 99% (p &lt; 0.01) significance levels.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>Tables 2-6 show the relationship between metals concentrations in the tissues of P. schlosseri and those in the geochemical fractions and total metal concentrations in the sediments.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> shows the correlation analysis between geochemical fractions and total metal concentrations of Cu in</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Pearson’s correlation between Cu concentrations in different tissues of P. schlosseri and geochemical fractions in the sediments</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameter</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Scale</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Muscle</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Bone</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Gills</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Operculum</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Intestine</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Liver</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cartilage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >EFLE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.235</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.263</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.234</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.221</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.243</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.427</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.353</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acid-reducible</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.278</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.169</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.257</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.302</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.182</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.341</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.244</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oxidisable organic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.619<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.586<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.536<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.214</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.541<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.647<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.071</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.029</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Resistant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.467</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.405</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.441</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.193</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.477<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.138</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.333</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.563<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.480<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.527<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.196</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.547<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.465</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.139</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.395</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>**</sup>Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed); <sup>*</sup>Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Pearson’s correlation between Zn concentrations in different tissues of P. schlosseri and geochemical fractions in the sediments</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameter</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Scale</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Muscle</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Bone</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Gills</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Operculum</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Intestine</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Liver</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cartilage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >EFLE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.217</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.028</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.102</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.271</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.231</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.457</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.672<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.338</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acid-reducible</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.306</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.161</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.306</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.295</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.464</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.686<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.403</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oxidisable organic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.097</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.049</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.225</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.462</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.234</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.423</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Resistant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.413</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.318</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.043</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.152</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.112</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.113</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.436</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.235</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.277</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.255</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.268</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.428</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.356</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.483<sup>*</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>**</sup>Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed); <sup>*</sup>Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Pearson’s correlation analysis, relationship between Pb concentrations in different tissues of P. schlosseri and geochemical fractions in the sediments</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameter</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Scale</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Muscle</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Bone</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Gills</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Operculum</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Intestine</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Liver</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cartilage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >EFLE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.766<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.349</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.742<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.309</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.713<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.445</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.384</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.725<sup>**</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acid-reducible</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.621<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.112</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.606<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.582<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.148</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.117</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.539<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oxidisable organic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.608<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.144</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.617<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.156</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.563<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.139</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.102</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.472<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Resistant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.549<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.046</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.621<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.111</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.537<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.026</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.034</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.453</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.621<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.082</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.670<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.594<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.056</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.032</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.535<sup>*</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>**</sup>Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed); <sup>*</sup>Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Pearson’s correlation analysis, relationship between Cd concentrations in different tissues of P. schlosseri and geochemical fractions in the sediments</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameter</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Scale</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Muscle</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Bone</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Gills</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Operculum</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Intestine</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Liver</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cartilage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >EFLE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.528<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.378</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.381</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.191</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.227</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.681<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.529<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.478<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acid-reducible</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.131</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.166</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.189</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.381</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.146</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.391</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.162</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oxidisable organic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.598<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.373</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−.582<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.470<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.243</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.592<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.211</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.407</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Resistant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.394</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.432</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.344</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.333</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.291</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.649<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.098</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.338</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.404</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.542<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.308</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.222</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.601<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.235</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.521<sup>*</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>**</sup>Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed); <sup>*</sup>Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Pearson’s correlation analysis, relationship between Ni concentrations in different tissues of P. schlosseri and geochemical fractions in the sediments</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameter</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Scale</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Muscle</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Bone</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Gills</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Operculum</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Intestine</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Liver</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cartilage</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >EFLE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.505<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.535</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.368</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.537</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.292</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.542</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acid-reducible</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.029</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.283</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.258</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.033</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.042</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.377</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.288</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.508</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oxidisable organic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.149</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.097</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.219</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.424</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.149</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.368</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.694<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.432</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Resistant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.575<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.884<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.917<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.500<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.694<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.938<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.967<sup>**</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.695<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.829<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.775<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.838<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.825<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.668<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.480<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.647<sup>**</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>**</sup>Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed); <sup>*</sup>Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).</p><p>the sediments and Cu concentration in the tissues of P. schlosseri. Non-significant correlations (p &gt; 0.05) were observed between Cu in all the tissues with the EFLE and acid-reducible fractions in the sediments. Significant positive correlations were observed between oxidisable-organic fraction of Cu with Cu concentrations in scale and intestine (p &lt; 0.01), muscle, bone, and operculum (p &lt; 0.05) with Cu oxidisable-organic fraction. This could be explained by high affinity of Cu to humic substances which are fraction of natural organic matter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref19">19</xref>] (F&#246;rstner, 1989; Pempkowiak et al., 1999) and the highest percentage of bioavailable Cu which was associated with oxidisable-organic fraction of Cu in the present study. Operculum shows a positive correlation (p &lt; 0.05) with the Cu resistant, the Cu concentration in scale, muscle, bone and operculum showed positive correlations (p &lt; 0.05) with total Cu concentration in the sediment. The correlations between Cu in sediment and P. schlosseri implied that, accumulation of Cu in P. schlosseri was related to these fractions.</p><p>A strong affinity between Cu and organic matter, due to high complexing tendency of Cu for organic matter was reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref20">20</xref>] Zhai et al. (2003). Therefore the bioavailability of Cu to P. schlosseri would depend on Cu bound to this fraction. In addition Cu in total fraction was also positively correlated with these tissues except with intestine and only operculum was correlated with resistant fraction of Cu. The correlations between Cu in sediment and P. schlosseri implied that, accumulation of Cu in P. schlosseri was related to these fractions. Non-significant correlations between EFLE and acid reducible Cu with all the examined tissues may probably be attributed to little Cu extracted from these fractions.</p><p>Pearson’s correlations analysis between different geochemical fractions of Zn in the sediments and Zn in the tissues of P. schlosseri was presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. Significant negative correlations (p &lt; 0.01) were found between Zn concentration in the liver with EFLE and acid-reducible fractions of Zn in the sediment whereas Zn concentration the in cartilage was negatively correlated (p &lt; 0.05) with total Zn in the sediments.</p><p>This finding is not in agreement with [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref21">21</xref>] Bochenek et al. (2008), who reported statistically significant positive correlation coefficients between Zn concentration in roach liver with Zn exchangeable and carbonate fractions concentrations in the sediments. The EFLE fraction is known to be the most bioavailable fraction and a better measure of bioavailable metal forms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref22">22</xref>] (Shulkin and Presley, 2003) which is considered to have most immediate effect on benthic organisms dwelling on sediment as well as other organisms like fishes, crabs and mussels [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref23">23</xref>] (Jenne and Luoma, 1997) while the acid-reducible fraction constitutes a significant sink for heavy metals in the aquatic system.</p><p>The effect of heavy metals on aquatic organisms is controlled by the concentrations and chemical forms of the metals in water and sediment. Excessive Zn will be toxic causing mortality, growth retardation and tissue alterations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref24">24</xref>] (Sorensen, 1991) in living organisms. Large but sub-lethal levels of Zn can induce pathological and morphological abnormalities in adult fish whereas larvae that hatched after exposure to Zn solutions displayed various malfunctions to eyes and optic capsules, and capsule jaws and branchial arch [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref25">25</xref>] (Somasundaram et al., 1984).</p><p>Fish have evolved homeostatic mechanisms to maintain optimal Zn levels to meet the needs for normal metabolism and physiology without toxicity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref26">26</xref>] (Kamunde et al., 2009). Therefore, the negative correlation observed between Zn concentrations in liver with EFLE and acid-reducible fractions of Zn might suggests homeostasis of Zn in liver being a target center for metabolism. Furthermore, higher concentrations of Zn in liver were predicted to occur at sampling sites with low EFLE and acid-reducible fractions which might probably, explained the high Zn content in liver and cartilage at M. Beku and Bg. Lalang and high Zn content in intestine at S. Garam. The relationship found between chronic exposure and metal bioaccumulation in aquatic biota shows that, usually Zn content is well regulated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref28">28</xref>] (Marcovecchio and Moreno, 1993; McGeer et al., 2003). The relatively large content of Zn in the tissues of the examined fish may be attributed to the percentage of Zn in the bioavailable fractions. Non-significant correlations between Zn in other tissues of P. schlosseri with all the geochemical fractions is further evidence that Zn is tightly regulated by fish [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref29">29</xref>] (Bury et al., 2003).</p><p>Correlations analysis between different geochemical fractions of Pb in the sediments and Pb in the tissues of P. schlosseri was presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>. Significant positive correlations (p &lt; 0.01 or p &lt; 0.05) were found between Pb in scale, bone, operculum and cartilage with all the geochemical fractions of Pb but cartilage was not correlated with resistant fraction of Pb. Non-significant correlation (p &gt; 0.05) was found between all geochemical fractions of Pb in sediments with muscle, gills, intestine and liver of P. schlosseri.</p><p>The correlations between Pb in sediment and P. schlosseri implied that Pb accumulation in P. schlosseri was related to metal concentrations in these fractions. It was also shown by the result of the present study that Pb concentration was generally highest in these hard tissues.</p><p>This could further be explained by the fact that, the permanent storage site of lead may be the calcified tissues, such as bones and scales, where Pb can replace calcium [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref30">30</xref>] (Coello and Khan, 1996). Non-significant correlations between all geochemical fractions of Pb in sediments with gills, intestine and liver of P. schlosseri might be attributed to regulatory functions of these organs. Gills and intestines are the main barriers that control absorption of metals from the environment and from contaminated preys [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref31">31</xref>] (Andres et al., 2000) while liver is the major organ involved in xenobiotic metabolism in fish [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref32">32</xref>] (Romeo et al., 1994). The non-significant correlation between muscles with any of the geochemical fraction of Pb might suggest muscle as poor accumulator of Pb. It has been reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref34">34</xref>] Bradley and Morris (1986); Wagner and Boman (2003) that fish muscle as a poor accumulator of Pb. It is generally accepted that muscle is not an active tissue in accumulating heavy metals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref35">35</xref>] (Karadede and &#220;nl&#252;, 2000) due to low levels of binding proteins in the muscle tissue.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> shows correlation between different geochemical fractions of Cd in the sediments and Cd concentration in different tissues of P. schlosseri. Significant positive correlations (p &lt; 0.05) were observed between EFLE Cd with Cd concentration in scale, liver and cartilage (r = 0.528, 0.529 and 0.478 respectively), but Cd in intestine shows a significant positive correlation (p &lt; 0.01) with EFLE Cd fraction. High concentration of Cd in these tissues were more likely to occur at sampling sites high in EFLE Cd. Tissues concentration of Cd were generally high at sampling sites with high percentage of EFLE fraction in the present study. Oxidisable-organic fraction of Cd shows a significant negative (p &lt; 0.01) correlation with scale and intestine, bone and gills were also negatively correlated (p &lt; 0.05) with oxidisable-organic fraction of Cd. The resistant Cd fraction in the sediments shows significant negative correlation (p &lt; 0.01) with Cd concentration in the intestine. Total Cd concentration in sediments shows significant correlation (p&lt;0.05) with muscle and significant negative correlation (p &lt; 0.01) with intestine and cartilage (p &lt; 0.05).</p><p>The total concentration of Cd in sediment and Cd concentration muscle were found highest at M. Beku which was in agreement with positive correlation obtained between Cd in sediment and muscle. The oxidisable-organic, resistant and total fractions of Cd were significantly and negatively correlated with Cd concentrations in different tissues of P. schlosseri, which might suggest that highest concentration of Cd in tissues will occur at sampling site with lowest concentrations of these fractions. Cd toxicity could be increased slightly through the presence of naturally occurring organic matter as indicated by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref36">36</xref>] (Giesy et al., 1977).</p><p>Non-significant correlations (p &gt; 0.05) were found between acid-reducible fractions of Cd with all the tissues in P. schlosseri. It has been suggested by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref37">37</xref>] Rautengarten et al. (1995) that Cd distribution is controlled by small mineral particles and organic matter, its mobility being determined by clay content. The non-significant correlation observed between acid-reducible fractions of Cd with all the tissues might be attributed to the metal concentration available to P. schlosseri in this fraction.</p><p>The correlation between different geochemical fractions of Ni in the sediment and Ni in the tissues of P. schlosseri was presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>. Significant negative correlation (p &lt; 0.05) was observed between EFLE Ni with Ni concentration in muscle which might imply high concentrations of Ni in muscle occurred at sampling site low in EFLE Ni. The oxidisable-organic fraction of Ni showed significant positive correlations with Ni concentration in the liver. The resistant of fraction Ni showed a positive correlation (p &lt; 0.01) with Ni concentration in; muscle, bone, operculum, intestine and cartilage while scale and gills showed significant positive correlation (p &lt; 0.05) with resistant fraction of Ni in the sediment. Total Ni concentration in sediment shows positive correlation (p &lt; 0.01) with Ni concentration in all the tissues except liver which was positively correlated at p &lt; 0.05.</p><p>The positively correlations observed between oxidisable-organic, non-resistant, resistant and total Ni with Ni in different tissues of P. schlosseri suggest high concentrations of Ni in tissues occurred at sampling site high in these fractions. In general, Ni is present predominantly in oxidisable and residual fractions in aquatic sediments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62396-ref38">38</xref>] (Staelens, et al., 2000; Zhai, et al., 2003).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>The results of the present study showed significant correlations between metal concentrations in some tissues of P. schlosseri and metals concentrations in different geochemical fractions of sediments. This indicated the ability of the fish to accumulate or regulate heavy metals in its tissues: scale, bone, operculum, intestine, liver and cartilage, therefore, the present study might suggest the use of P. schlosseri as a biomonitoring agent for heavy metals pollution in the west coast of Peninsular Malaysia.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors wish to express their gratitude to Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia for funding this study under Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (Vot: 5523641).</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Tijjani Rufa’iBuhari,AhmadIsmail, (2016) Correlations between Geo-Chemical Speciation of Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, Pb, Cd and Ni) in Surface Sediments and Their Concentrations in Giant Mudskipper (Periophthalmodon schlosseri) Collected from the West Coast of Peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection,04,28-36. doi: 10.4236/gep.2016.41003</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.62396-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abdel-Baki, A., Dkhil, M. and Al-Quraishy, S. (2013) Bioaccumulation of Some Heavy Metals in Tilapia Fish Relevant to Their Concentration in Water and Sediment of Wadi Hanifah, Saudi Arabia. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10, 2541-2547. http://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajb/article/view/93185</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mendil, D. and Uluozlu, O.D. (2007) Determination of Trace Metal Levels in Sediment and Five Fish Species from Lakes in Tokat, Turkey. Food Chemistry, 101, 739-745. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.01.050</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Luoma, S.N. (1983) Bioavailability of Trace Metals to Aquatic Organisms—A Review. The Science of the Total Environment, 28, 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(83)80004-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Luoma, S.N. (1989) Can We Determine the Biological Availability of Sediment-Bound Trace Elements? Hydrobiologia, 176, 379-396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00026572</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Eimers, M., Evans, R. and Welbourn, P. (2001) Cadmium Accumulation in the Freshwater Isopod Asellus Racovitzai: The Relative Importance of Solute and Particulate Sources at Trace Concentrations. Environmental Pollution, 111, 247-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(00)00066-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yu, K.C., Tsai, L.J., Chen, S.H. and Ho, S.T. (2001) Correlation Analyses on Binding Behavior of Heavy Metals with Sediment Matrices. Water Research, 35, 2417-2428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00518-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Allen, H. and Hansen, D. (1996) The Importance of Trace Metal Speciation to Water Quality Criteria. Water Environment Research, 68, 42-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.2175/106143096X127307</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Billon, G., Ouddane, B., Recourt, P. and Boughriet, A. (2002) Depth Variability and Some Geochemical Characteristics of Fe, Mn, Ca, Mg, Sr, S, P, Cd and Zn in Anoxic Sediments from Authie Bay (Northern France). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 55, 167-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ecss.2001.0894</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Van Dyk, J.C., Pieterse, G. and Van Vuren, J. (2007) Histological Changes in the Liver of Oreochromis Mossambicus (Cichlidae) after Exposure to Cadmium and Zinc. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 66, 432-440. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.10.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chourpagar, A.R. and Kulkarni, G.K. (2011) Heavy Metal Toxicity to a Freshwater Crab, Barytelphusa Cunicularis (Westwood) from Aurangabad Region. Recent Research in Science and Technology, 3, 1-5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kruitwagen, G. (2007) Ecology and Toxicology of Mangrove Fauna in Tanzania: With Particular Reference to the Mudskipper. PhD Dissertation, Radbound University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ismail, A. (1993) Heavy Metal Concentrations in Sediments off Bintulu, Malaysia. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 27, 706-707. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0025-326X(93)90556-Y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zulkifli, S.Z., Ismail, A., Mohamat-Yusuff, F., Arai, T. and Miyazaki, N. (2010) Johor Strait as a Hotspot for Trace Elements Contamination in Peninsular Malaysia. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 84, 568-573. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00128-010-9998-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Badri, M. and Aston, S. (1983) Observations on Heavy Metal Geochemical Associations in Polluted and Non-Polluted Estuarine Sediments. Environmental Pollution Series B, Chemical and Physical, 6, 181-193.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0143-148X(83)90033-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tessier, A. and Campbell, P.G.C. (1987) Partitioning of Trace Metals in Sediments: Relationships with Bioavailability. Hydrobiologia, 149, 43-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00048645</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mucha, A.P., Vasconcelos, M. and Bordalo, A.A. (2003) Macrobenthic Community in the Douro Estuary: Relations with Trace Metals and Natural Sediment Characteristics. Environmental Pollution, 121, 169-180.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(02)00229-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ismail, A., Yap, C.K. and Chan, F.F. (2004) Concentrations of Cd, Cu and Zn in Sediments Collected from Urban Lakes at Kelana Jaya, Peninsular Malaysia. Wetland Science, 2, 248-258.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Forstner, U. (1989) Contaminated Sediments. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 21.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pempkowiak, J., Sikora, A. and Biernacka, E. (1999) Speciation of Heavy Metals in Marine Sediments vs. Their Bioaccumulation by Mussels. Chemosphere, 39, 313-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00112-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhai, M., Kampunzu, H., Modisi, M. and Totolo, O. (2003) Distribution of Heavy Metals in Gaborone Urban Soils (Botswana) and Its Relationship to Soil Pollution and Bedrock Composition. Environmental Geology, 45, 171-180.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00254-003-0877-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bochenek, I., Protasowicki, M. and Brucka-Jastrzbska, E. (2008) Concentrations of Cd, Pb, Zn, and Cu in Roach, Rutilus rutilis (L.) from the Lower Reaches of the Oder River, and Their Correlation with Concentrations of Heavy Metals in Bottom Sediments Collected in the Same Area. Archives of Polish Fisheries, 16, 21-36.http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s10086-008-0002-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shulkin, V. and Presley, B. (2003) Metal Concentrations in Mussel Crenomytilus grayanus and Oyster Crassostrea gigas in Relation to Contamination of Ambient Sediments. Environment International, 29, 493-502.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0160-4120(03)00004-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Jenne, E.A. and Luoma, S.N. (1997) Forms of Trace Metals. Forms in Soils, Sediments and Associated Waters: An Overview of Their Determination and Biological Availability. In: Wildung, R. and Drucker, H., Eds., Biological Implications of Metals in the Environment, ERDA Symposium Series 42, Energy Research and Development Administration, Ridge, 110-143.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sorensen, E.M.B. (1991) Metal Poisoning in Fish. CRC Press, Boca Raton.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Somasundaram, B., King, P.E. and Shackley, S. (1984) The Effects of Zinc on Postfertilization Development in Eggs of Clupea harengus L. Aquatic Toxicology, 5, 167-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0166-445X(84)90007-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kamunde, C., Sappal, R., Burka, J. and Dawson, S. (2009) Bioaccumulation and Subcellular Partitioning of Zinc in Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): Cross-Talk between Waterborne and Dietary Uptake. Aquatic Toxicology, 91, 281-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2008.10.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marcovecchio, J.E. and Moreno, V.J. (1993) Cadmium, Zinc and Total Mercury Levels in the Tissues of Several Fish Species from La Plata River Estuary, Argentina. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 25, 119-130.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00549133</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McGeer, J.C., Brix, K.V., Skeaff, J.M., DeForest, D.K., Brigham, S.I., Adams, W.J. and Green, A. (2003) Inverse Relationship between Bioconcentration Factor and Exposure Concentration for Metals: Implications for Hazard Assessment of Metals in the Aquatic Environment. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 22, 1017-1037.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620220509</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bury, N., Walker, P. and Glover, C. (2003) Nutritive Metal Uptake in Teleost Fish. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 206, 11-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.00068</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Coello, W. and Khan, M. (1996) Protection against Heavy Metal Toxicity by Mucus and Scales in Fish. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 30, 319-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00212289</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Andres, S., Ribeyre, F., Tourencq, J.N. and Boudou, A. (2000) Interspecific Comparison of Cadmium and Zinc Contamination in the Organs of Four Fish Species along a Polymetallic Pollution Gradient (Lot River, France). The Science of the Total Environment, 248, 11-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00477-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Romeo, M., Mathieu, A., Gnassia-Barelli, M., Romana, A. and Lafaurie, M. (1994) Heavy Metal Content and Biotransformation Enzymes in Two Fish Species from the NW Mediterranean. Marine Ecology Progress Series. Oldendorf, 107, 15-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/meps107015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bradley, R. and Morris, J. (1986) Heavy Metals in Fish from a Series of Metal-Contaminated Lakes near Sudbury, Ontario. Water, Air, &amp; Soil Pollution, 27, 341-354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00649416</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wagner, A. and Boman, J. (2003) Biomonitoring of Trace Elements in Muscle and Liver Tissue of Freshwater Fish 1. Spectrochimica Acta Part B: Atomic Spectroscopy, 58, 2215-2226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sab.2003.05.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Karadede, H. and ünlü, E. (2000) Concentrations of Some Heavy Metals in Water, Sediment and Fish Species from the Atatürk Dam Lake (Euphrates), Turkey. Chemosphere, 41, 1371-1376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00563-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Giesy Jr., J., Leversee, G. and Williams, D. (1977) Effects of Naturally Occurring Aquatic Organic Fractions on Cadmium Toxicity to Simocephalus serrulatus (Daphnidae) and Gambusia affinis (Poeciliidae). Water Research, 11, 1013-1020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(77)90160-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rautengarten, A., Schnoor, J., Anderberg, S., Olendrzynski, K. and Stigliani, W. (1995) Soil Sensitivity Due to Acid and Heavy Metal Deposition in East Central Europe. Water, Air, &amp; Soil Pollution, 85, 737-742.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00476917</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62396-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Staelens, N., Parkpian, P. and Polprasert, C. (2000) Assessment of Metal Speciation Evolution in Sewage Sludge Dewatered in Vertical Flow Reed Beds Using a Sequential Extraction Scheme. Chemical Speciation and Bioavailability, 12, 97-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.3184/095422900782775517</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>