<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AID</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Advances in Infectious Diseases</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2164-2648</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/aid.2015.54025</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AID-62214</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Coagulase Gene Typing with Emphasis on Methicillin-Resistance Staphylococci: Emergence to Public Health
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>alia</surname><given-names>A. Hamza</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sohad</surname><given-names>M. Dorgham</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Amany</surname><given-names>Arafa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Zoonoses, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Microbiology, National Research Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>dodo_zoonosis@yahoo.com(AAH)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>10</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>196</fpage><lpage>203</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>22</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>22</month>	<year>December</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>25</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Emerging antimicrobial resistance among CNS is a concern in veterinary and human medicine. Coagulase test is considered as the key test to differentiate staphylococci to two groups, coagulase positive staphylococci (CPS) and coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS). A total of 200
   
  Staphylococci 
  strains were isolated with percentage 66.7% (200/300) from quarter milk samples. The total of
   
  S. aureus 
  strains are 70 with percentage 35% (70/200). Among 70 strains of
   
  S. aureus
  , 30 strains are coagulase positive
   
  S. aureus
   
  with percentage 43% (30/70) and coagulase negative
   
  S. aureus 
  57% (40/70). CNS other than
   
  S. aureus 
  was detected with percentage 65% (130/200) from subclinical mastitic cows. We examine sixty isolates of staphylococci recovered from subclinical mastitis in dairy cattle which divided as ten isolates of coagulase positive
   
  S. aureus
   
  (CP
   
  S. aureus
  ), ten isolates of coagulase negative
   
  S. aureus
  (CN
   
  S. aureus
  ) and forty isolates of coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS) which identified using API-Staph Kits as
   
  S. chromogenes
  ,
   
  S. simulans
  ,
   
  S. haemolyticus
  ,
   
  S. epidermidis 
  and
   
  S. cohnii. 
  The genotypic detection of
   
  coa
   
  gene and
   
  mec
  A gene was screened in CP
   
  S. aureus
  , CN
   
  S. aureus 
  and CNS.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Coagulase</kwd><kwd> coa Gene</kwd><kwd> mecA Gene</kwd><kwd> Staphylococci</kwd><kwd> Methicillin</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Staphylo-coagulase is an extracellular protein that has traditionally been used to differentiate S. aureus from the less virulent staphylococci. S. aureus secretes two clotting factors, coagulase (Coa) and von Willebrand factor binding protein (vWbp). The Coa and vWbp together are required for the formation of abscesses and promote the non-proteolytic activation of prothrombin and cleavage of fibrinogen, reactions that are inhibited with specific antibody against each of these molecules. Coa and vWbp specific antibodies confer protection against abscess formation and S. aureus lethal bacteraemia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref1">1</xref>] . Although Coa enzyme is also produced by Staphylococcus intermedius and some Staphylococcus hyicus strains but coagulase production is one of the most reliable criteria for the identification of S. aureus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), have become the most commonly isolated microorganisms from bovine milk in many countries and are regarded as emerging mastitis pathogens [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref3">3</xref>] . In addition, CNS are abundantly present both in the cows’ environment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref4">4</xref>] and on their teat apices [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref5">5</xref>] . Also CNS showed high virulence by their ability to form biofilm which also get cells in biofilm more resist to antimicrobial [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref6">6</xref>] . So we are focusing in this study on subclinical mastitic cows and we examine all recovered coagulase positive and coagulase negative staphylococci.</p><p>The resistance to methicillin is caused by the presence of the mecA gene, which encodes the 78-kDa penicillin-binding protein (PBP) 2a (or PBP2’) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref7">7</xref>] . Staphylococcus strains with mecA are resistant to lactam antibiotics and frequently code for multi-drug resistance, which may represent a serious health and economic concern [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref8">8</xref>] . Consequently, it is highly important to detect mecA, especially in all Staphylococcus strains [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>The resistance genes might in some instances transfer from staphylococci of animal origin to staphylococci that cause infections in humans, thereby compromising antimicrobial treatment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref10">10</xref>] . CNS colonising the udder of buffaloes and cows may represent a reservoir of different antibiotic resistance genes and SCCmec elements. This raised the question of whether the genetic background could be a reservoir for interspecies gene transfer among CNS and S. aureus in the udder as it was previously suggested in the intestinal tract [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>In recent years, increasing numbers of reports have shown that the mecA gene is present in CNS strains, including hospital-acquired infections, neighborhoods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref12">12</xref>] , animal epidermis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref13">13</xref>] , beaches [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref14">14</xref>] and public transportation systems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref15">15</xref>] .</p><p>Therefore, the present work aimed to: 1) detect the presence of coa gene in Staphylococci field isolates from subclinical mastitic cows phenotypically and genotypically; 2) detect methicillin resistance gene in S. aureus and other CNS.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Sampling</title><p>The study took place in private dairy farms surrounding Giza, Egypt. A total of 300 quarter milk samples milk samples were aseptically collected from 85 mastitic dairy cattle. The animals had not been treated with an antibiotic for at least 30 days prior to collection. Milk sample collection was performed using the method of the National Mastitis Council, with some modifications, under aseptic conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref16">16</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Isolation and Identification</title><p>Each milk sample was plated on two plates the first plate containing Columbia Agar base with 5% defibrinated sheep blood (Oxoid) and the second plate was mannitol salt agar. Test plates were incubated for 24 - 48 hours at 37˚C &#177; 1˚C. All isolates were presumptively identified as staphylocooci based on colony morphology, Gram staining, catalase reaction, and oxidative-fermentative testing. After confirmation of the genus Staphylococcus, the enzyme coagulase was characterized among all isolates using both the slide and tube methods according to Quinn et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref17">17</xref>] . Coagulase-negative isolates resistant to methicillin were subjected to identification to the species level using the API-Staph Kit (BioMerieux, P.O. Box 4328, Honeydew, 2040) as described by Petzer et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref18">18</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Phenotypic Antimicrobial Resistance Tests</title><p>Antimicrobials were selected for testing based on the licensing for mastitis treatment in cattle, use in human medicine and potential resistant determinant phenotypes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref20">20</xref>] . Susceptibility of the isolates were determined against 10 antimicrobial agents as commercial discs (Oxoid) which commonly used for treatment of bovine mastitis in Egypt or considered as important agents for humans as follows: antimicrobials used for treatment of bovine mastitis included in this study were ciprofloxacin (5 &#181;g), erythromycin (15 &#181;g), gentamicin (10 &#181;g), penicillin (10 units) and tetracycline (30 &#181;g). Antimicrobials not used for treatment of bovine mastitis but important for humans were clindamycin (2 &#181;g), oxacillin (1 &#181;g), rifampicin (5 &#181;g) and vancomycin (30 &#181;g). Isolates were inoculated into Mueller-Hinton broth (Oxoid) and incubated overnight at 37˚C. The turbidity of the suspensions were adjusted to a 0.5 McFarland standard and streaked onto Mueller-Hinton agar (Oxoid) plates. Antimicrobial disks were added on the plates and they were incubated aerobically at 35˚C for 16 - 18 h. The results were recorded as susceptible, intermediate, or resistant by measurement of the inhibition zone diameter. Resistance was determined by measurement of inhibition of growth around the antimicrobial disk according to the zone diameter interpretative standards of CLSI [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref21">21</xref>] or according to the antimicrobials manufacturers’ instructions. The reference strain S. aureus ATCC 25923 was used as the quality control organism and included with each batch of isolates tested.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Molecular Detection of Coagulase (coa) Gene and Methicillin Resistance Genes (mecA) Gene in Staphylococcal Isolates</title><sec id="s2_4_1"><title>2.4.1. DNA Extraction</title><p>Prior to DNA extraction, the bacterial strains were cultivated on blood agar base (Oxoid, Germany) containing 5% defibrinated sheep blood for 24 h at 37˚C then genomic DNA of randomly selected 60 staphylococci strains were extracted by using an extraction kit (QIA amp mini kit, Qiagen). DNA was stored at −20˚C. To detect coa gene and mecA gene in examined staphylococcal isolates, specific oligonucleotide primers for coa gene and mecA gene were described in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. All primers were supplied by Sigma Genosys (Sigma).</p></sec><sec id="s2_4_2"><title>2.4.2. PCR for Detection of coa Gene Specific for Coagulase Production</title><p>The reaction with these primers were carried out using a total volume of 25 μl reaction mixtures contained 5 &#181;l of DNA as template, 20 pmol of each primer and 1&#215; of PCR master mix (Dream Taq Green PCR Master Mix, Fermentas Life Science). Amplification was conducted in Thermal cycler which was adjusted for detection of coa gene as follows, an initial denaturation at 94˚C for 45 sec. The cycling proceeded for 30 cycles of denaturation at 94˚C for 20 sec, annealing at 57˚C for 15 sec, and extension at 70˚C for 15 sec with a final step of final extension at 72˚C for 2 min.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4_3"><title>2.4.3. PCR for Detection of mecA Gene Specific for Methicillin Resistance</title><p>The reaction with these primers were carried out using a total volume of 25 μl reaction mixtures contained 5 &#181;l of DNA as template, 20 pmol of each primer and 1&#215; of PCR master mix (Dream Taq Green PCR Master Mix, Fermentas Life Science). Amplification was conducted in Thermal cycler which was adjusted for detection of mecA gene as follows, an initial denaturation at 94˚C for 4 min. The cycling proceeded for 35 cycles of denaturation at 94˚C for 60 sec, annealing at 55˚C for 60 sec, and extension at 72˚C for 60 sec with a final step of final extension at 72˚C for 10 min.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Isolates</title><p>All suspected colonies were examined under light microscope to detect Gram positive cocci occurring singly, in pairs, in short chain or in irregular clusters like bunch of grapes. The results of traditional biochemical tests and</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Primer sequences for coa gene specific for coagulase production and mecA gene specific for methicillin resistance in staphylocooci</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Primers target</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sequence</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Anneali-ng</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Amplified product size</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >References</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(coa)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ATA GAG ATGCTG GTA CAG G GCT TCC GATTGT TCG ATG C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >750 bp</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref22">22</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(mecA)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GTGAAGATATACCAAGTGATT3’ ATGCGCTATAGATTGAAAGGAT3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55˚C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >147 bp</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref23">23</xref>]</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>API-Staph Kits indicated that all isolates are Staphylococci spp. A total of 200 staphylococci strains were isolated with percentage 66.7% (200/300).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Investigation of Coagulase Production by Coagulase Tube Test</title><p>The total of S. aureus strains are 70 with percentage 35% (70/200). Among 70 strains of S. aureus, 30 strains are coagulase positive S. aureus with percentage 43% (30/70) and coagulase negative S. aureus 57% (40/70). CNS other than S. aureus was detected with percentage 65% (130/200) from subclinical mastitic cows. The previous results were illustrated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Detection of coa Gene Specific for Coagulase Enzyme Production</title><p>Sixty staphylococci strains were randomly selected for detection of coa gene, our results showed somewhat differences between phenotypic and genotypic detection of coagulase enzyme. It was noted that 10 strain of S. aureus, classified as coagulase negative by tube coagulase test were found to be positive with PCR. This result was illustrated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Detection of mecA Gene Specific for Methicillin Resistance</title><p>The results of PCR for amplification of 147 bp fragment for mecA gene performed with its specific primer were observed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Number and percentage of CPS and CNS strains differentiated according to coagulase test and API kit</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >No. of samples</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Staphylococci strains</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >S. aureus strains</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CP S. aureus</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CN S. aureus</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CNS other than S. aureus</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >300</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200 (66.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70 (35%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 (43%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 (57%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130 (65%)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Classification of CNS other than S. aureus according to API kit results</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >No. of CNS other than S. aureus</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CNS other than S. aureus</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >No %</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S. chromogenes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 (31%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S. simulans</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10 (7.7%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >130</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S. haemolyticus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 (23%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S. epidermidis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35 (27%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S. cohnii</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 (12%)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Phenotypic and genotypic differences in detection of coagulase enzyme</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Strains</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >CP S. aureus (10 strains)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >CN S. aureus (10 strains)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >CNS other than S. aureus (40 strains)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number of positive strains</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number of positive strains</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number of positive strains</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phenotypic (coagulase test)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Genotypic (coa gene)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Results of PCR for amplification detection of 147 bp fragment for mecA gene performed with their specific primer</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Gene</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >CP S. aureus (10)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >CN S. aureus (10)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >CNS other than S. aureus (40)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >positive amplification of mecA gene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >positive amplification of mecA gene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >positive amplification of mecA gene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >mecA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Mastitis is one of the major causes in financial losses for dairy cattle farmers. Staphylococcal species associated with bovine mastitis have been classified as coagulase positive or coagulase negative. CNS has become the most common bovine mastitis isolate in many countries and could therefore be described as emerging mastitis pathogens. CNS is not as pathogenic as the other principal mastitis pathogens and infection mostly remains subclinical. However, CNS can cause persistent infections, which result in increased milk somatic cell count (SCC) and decreased milk quality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref24">24</xref>] . The current results reported that CNS was the predominant isolate recovered from subclinical mastitis cows with percentage 65%, these result was in harmony with El-Jakee et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref25">25</xref>] who reported that CNS is generally high in subclinical mastitic samples, but low in samples from animals with clinical mastitis.</p><p>In our study, S. chromogenes, S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus were the most prevalent CNS with percentage 31%, 27% and 23% respectively.</p><p>Our results were nearly agreed with Waller et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref26">26</xref>] who reported that S. epidermidis was the most common CNS in Subclinical mastitis and S. haemolyticus was also quite common, Piessens et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref4">4</xref>] stated that S. chromogenes and S. haemolyticus to be the most common species in milk samples from cows with intramammary infections (IMI). Persistent IMI was common to quarters infected with S. epidermidis indicating a more udder- adapted origin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref27">27</xref>] .</p><p>Molecular typing of microorganisms is very essential for infection control programs. These molecular techniques are rapid and accurate. On the other side, traditional phenotypic methods have several drawbacks.</p><p>Recent studies recommended that phenotypic and genotypic identification of CNS do not necessarily agree [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref28">28</xref>] .</p><p>According to our results, we found that10 strains, classified as coagulase negative by tube coagulase test were found to be positive with PCR, this result was completely agreed with Gharib et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref29">29</xref>] who mentioned that 2 strains, classified as coagulase negative by tube coagulase test were found to be positive with PCR amplification of the gene which clearly emphasizes the use of molecular methods in detecting S. aureus. The coa gene amplification has been considered a simple and accurate method for typing of S. aureus isolated from distinct sources, the coagulase protein is an important virulence factor of S. aureus. Like spa, coa has a polymorphic repeat region that can be used for differentiating S. aureus isolates. The variable region of coa gene is comprised of 81 bp tandem short sequence repeats (SSRs) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref30">30</xref>] .</p><p>In our study, all PCR products for coa gene were detected at 750 bp, this result agreed with Schlegelova et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref31">31</xref>] who reported the size of coa gene PCR product of S. aureus isolates from dairy cow and human are 650 - 1050 bp.</p><p>Emerging antimicrobial resistance among CNS is a concern in veterinary and human medicine. Archer and Climo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref32">32</xref>] reported an escalation of resistance for almost all antimicrobial classes excluding glycopeptides: β- lactams aminoglycosides, trimethoprim, rifampin, fluoroquinolones, macrolides, and tetracyclines. Humans and dairy cattle may share CNS strains, implying that bovine multidrug resistant staphylococci might be zoonotic pathogens [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref33">33</xref>] . <sup> </sup></p><p>The widespread use of antibiotics on dairy farms and other food-producing animals could lead to the selection and emergence of antibiotic resistant bacterial strains [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref34">34</xref>] to become a serious public health problem because of the possibility of dissemination of the antimicrobial resistant bacteria to humans via food. In Egypt, very little is known about the use of antibiotics on small dairy farms as is the case in lower/middle-income countries. Redding et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref35">35</xref>] <sup> </sup>found that the farmers’ knowledge of antibiotics was significantly associated with the use of antibiotics for preventative reasons, the purchase of antibiotics from feed-stores, the experience of complications in animals after having administered antibiotics, the number of workers on the farm, the educational level of the farmer and its infrequent use, because therapeutic interventions were sought only when the animal had reached an advanced stage of clinical disease. Also, because of their inability to define an antibiotic and in contrast to Redding et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref35">35</xref>] , many farmers do not understand that the use of antibiotics carried inherent risks to their animals and potentially to the consumers of dairy products from treated animals. In the recent study to Osman et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref9">9</xref>] , the highest resistance rate was observed against penicillin, ampicillin and oxacillin in CNS isolates. The emergence of high levels of penicillin resistance followed by the development and spread of strains resistant to the semisynthetic penicillin (oxacillin), macrolides, tetracyclines, and aminoglycosides has made the therapy of staphylococcal disease a global challenge [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref33">33</xref>] . In the present work, mecA gene was detected with high incidence in CNS other than S. aureus followed by CP S. aureus and CN S. aureus with percentage 22%, 20% and 10% respectively. Our result supported by Bochniarz et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref36">36</xref>] who reported that, recently a significant increase has been observed in the number of isolated methicillin resistance CNS (mecA-gene-positive) which are resistant to all groups of β-lactam antibiotics. Taponen and Pyorala [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref37">37</xref>] stated that, mastitis-causing coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) tend to be more resistant to antimicrobials than S. aureus and may be a source of β-lactam resistance genes.</p><p>The importance of CNS has increased and they have become the predominant pathogens isolated from subclinical mastitis in several countries which leading to economic losses resulting in decreased milk production. In addition to that, studying antimicrobial susceptibility of CNS at the species level can provide valuable information about species-specific differences that can be vital data for effective mastitis therapy and control [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.62214-ref33">33</xref>] . The significance of our study in the prevention of staphylococci contamination in milk is to avoid spread of resistant strains of staphylococci from animal to anther and to human.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Because of the possibility of misidentifying S. aureus as CNS depending on coagulase test only so we recommend that genotypic detection to coa gene is very important for identification as well as the possibility of dissemination of the antimicrobial resistant bacteria to humans via the food processing chains. Screening the dairy industry for antimicrobial resistant bacteria should be performed as the resistance genes might in some instances transfer from staphylococci of animal origin to staphylococci that cause infections in humans, thereby compromising antimicrobial treatment.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Dalia A.Hamza,Sohad M.Dorgham,AmanyArafa, (2015) Coagulase Gene Typing with Emphasis on Methicillin-Resistance Staphylococci: Emergence to Public Health. Advances in Infectious Diseases,05,196-203. doi: 10.4236/aid.2015.54025</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.62214-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cheng, A.G., Mcadow, M., Kim, H.K., Bae, T., Missiakas, D.M. and Schneewind, O. (2010) Contribution of Coagulases towards Staphylococcus aureus Disease and Protective Immunity. PLoS Pathogens, 6, 1-17. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1001036</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Koneman, E.W., Allen, S.D., Janda, W.M., Schreckenberger, P.C. and Winn, W.C. (1992) Gram-Positive Coccipart I: Staphylococci and Related Organisms. In: Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology, JP Lippincott Company, Philadelphia, 405-429.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ajitkumar, P., Barkema, H.W., Zadoks, R.N., Morck, D.W., van der Meer, F.J.U.M. and De Buck, J. (2013) High Resolution Melt Analysis for Species Identification of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Derived from Bovine Milk. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 75, 227-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.11.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Piessens, V., Van Coillie, E., Verbist, B., Supré, K., Braem, G., Van Nuffel, A., De Vuyst, L., Heyndrickx, M. and De Vliegher, S. (2011) Distribution of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcus Species from Milk and Environment of Dairy Cows Differs between Herds. Journal of Dairy Science, 94, 2933-2944. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3956</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Braem, G., De Vliegher, S., Verbist, B., Piessens, V., Van Coillie, E., De Vuyst, L. and Leroy, F. (2013) Unraveling the Microbiota of Teat Apices of Clinically Healthy Lactating Dairy Cows, with Special Emphasis on Coagulase- Negative Staphylococci. Journal of Dairy Science, 96, 1499-1510. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5493</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Osman, K.M., Abd El-Razik, K.A., Marie, H.S.H. and Arafa, A.A. (2015) Relevance of Biofilm Formation and Virulence of Different Species of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci to Public Health. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology &amp; Infectious Diseases, 34, 2009-2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-015-2445-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ender, M., Mccalum, N., Adhikari, R. and Berger-Bachi, B. (2004) Fitness Cost of SCCmec and Methicillin Resistance Levels in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 48, 2295-2297. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.48.6.2295-2297.2004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cosgrove, S.E., Sakoulas, G., Perencevich, E.N., Schwaber, M.J., Karchmer, A.W. and Carmeli, Y. (2003) Comparison of Mortality Associated with Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Meta-Analysis. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 36, 53-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/345476</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Osman, K.M., Abd El-Razik, K.A., Marie, H.S.H. and Arafa, A.A. (2015) Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Collected from Bovine Milk: Species and Antimicrobial Genes Diversity. Journal of Food Safety, Article First Published Online: 16 AUG 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jfs.12216</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Irlinger, F. (2008) Safety Assessment of Dairy Microorganisms: Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 126, 302-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.08.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vitali, L.A., Petrelli, D., Lamikanra, A., Prenna, M. and Akinkunmi, E.O. (2014) Diversity of Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec Elements in Faecal Isolates of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci from Nigeria. BMC Microbiology, 14, 106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-14-106</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hisata, K., Ito, T., Matsunaga, N., et al. (2011) Dissemination of Multiple MRSA Clones among Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections from Japanese Children with Impetigo. Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy, 17, 609-621. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10156-011-0223-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schnellmann, C., Gerber, V., Rossano, A., Jaquier, V., Panchaud, Y., Doherr, M.G., Thomann, A., Straub, R. and Perreten, V. (2006) Presence of New mecA and mph(C) Variants Conferring Antibiotic Resistance in Staphylococcus spp. Isolated from the Skin of Horses before and after Clinic Admission. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 44, 4444-4454. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00868-06</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Soge, O.O., Meschke, J.S., No, D.B. and Roberts, M.C. (2009) Characterization of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Resistant Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcus spp. Isolated from US West Coast Public Marine Beaches. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 64, 1148-1155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkp368</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhou, F. and Wang, Y. (2013) Characteristics of Antibiotic Resistance of Airborne Staphylococcus Isolated from Metro Stations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10, 2412-2426. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10062412</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oliver, S.P., Gonzalez, R.N., Hogan, J.S., Jayarao, B.M. and Owens, W.E. (2004) Microbiological Procedures for the Diagnosis of Bovine Udder Infection and Determination of Milk Quality. Fourth Edition, National Mastitis Council, Madison.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Quinn, P.J., Markey, B.K., Leonard, F.C., Fitz Patrick, E.S., Fanning, S. and Hartigan, P.J. (2011) Veterinary Microbiology and Microbial Diseases. Second Edition, Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Petzer, I.M., Karzis, J., Lesosky, M., Wayermeyer, J.C. and Badenhorst, R. (2013) Host Adapted Intramammary Infections in Pregnant Heifers Which Were Co-Housed and Reared on Fresh Milk as Calves. BMC Veterinary Research, 9, 49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-9-49</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">FAO/WHO/OIE (2008) Report of the Joint FAO/WHO/OIE Expert Meeting on Critically Important Antimicrobials. Rome, 26-30 November 2007. FAO, Rome and WHO, Geneva.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WHO, World Health Organization (2009) Critically Important Antimicrobials for Human Medicine. 2nd Revision, WHO Advisory Group on Integrated Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (AGISAR), Department of Food Safety and Zoonoses.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">CLSI, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2012) Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-Second 154 Informational Supplement. M100-S22, Volume 32, No. 3, Replaces M100-S21, Volume 31, No.1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hookey, J.V., Richardson, J. and Cookson, B.D. (1998) Molecular Typing of Staphylococcus aureus Based on PCR Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism and DNA Sequence Analysis of the Coagulase Gene. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 36, 1083-1089.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, K., McClure, J.A., Elsayed, S.T., Louie, T. and Conly, J.M. (2005) Novel Multiplex PCR Assay for Characterization and Concomitant Subtyping of Taphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec Types I to V in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 43, 5026-5033.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.43.10.5026-5033.2005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Py?r?l?, S. and Taponen, S. (2009) Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci-Emerging Mastitis Pathogens. Veterinary Microbiology, 134, 3-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.09.015 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El-Jakee, J.K., Aref, N.E., Gomaa, A., El-Hariri, M.D., Galal, H.M., Omar, S.A. and Samir, A. (2013) Emerging of Coagulase Negative Staphylococci as a Cause of Mastitis in Dairy Animals: An Environmental Hazard. International Journal of Veterinary Science and Medicine, 1, 74-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijvsm.2013.05.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Waller, K.P., Aspan, A., Nyman, A., Persson, Y. and Andersson, U.G. (2011) CNS Species and Antimicrobial Resistance in Clinical and Subclinical Bovine Mastitis. Veterinary Microbiology, 152, 112-116. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.04.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Thorberg, B.M., Kuhn, I., Aarestrup, F.M., Br?ndstrom, B., Jonsson, P. and Danielsson-Tham, M.L. (2006) Pheno- and Genotyping of Staphylococcus epidermidis Isolated from Bovine Milk and Human Skin. Veterinary Microbiology, 115, 163-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.01.013 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Taponen, S., Simojoki, H., Haveri, M., Larsen, H.D. and Py?r?l?, S. (2006) Clinical Characteristics and Persistence of Bovine Mastitis Caused by Different Species of Coagulase Negative Staphylococci Identified with API or AFLP. Veterinary Microbiology, 115, 199-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.02.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gharib, A.A., Adel Attia, M.A. and Bendary, M.A. (2013) Detection of the Coa Gene in Staphylococcus aureus from Different Sources by Polymerase Chain Reaction. International Journal of Microbiological Research, 4, 37-42.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Van Belkum, A., Scherer, S., Van-Alphen, L. and Verbrugh, H. (1998) Short-Sequence DNA Repeats in Prokaryotic Genomes. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 62, 275-293.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Schlegelova, J., Dendis, M., Benedik, J., Babak, V. and Rysanek, D. (2003) Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Dairy Cow and Human on a Farm Differ in Coagulase Genotype. Veterinary Microbiology Journal, 92, 327-334. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1135(02)00409-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Archer, G.L. and Climo, M.W. (1994) Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Coagulase Negative Staphylococci. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 38, 2231-2237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.38.10.2231</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Soares, L.C., Pereira, I.A., Pribul, B.R., Oliva, M.S., Coelho, S.M.O. and Souza, M.M.S. (2012) Antimicrobial Resistance and Detection of mec and blaZ Genes in Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcus Isolated from Bovine Mastitis. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, 32, 692-696. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-736X2012000800002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oliver, S.P., Murinda, S.E. and Jayarao, B.M. (2011) Impact of Antibiotic Use in Adult Dairy Cows on Antimicrobial Resistance of Veterinary and Human Pathogens: A Comprehensive Review. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, 8, 337-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2010.0730</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Redding, L.E., Cubas-Delgado, F., Sammel, M.D., Smith, G., Galligan, D.T., Levy, M.Z. and Hennessy, S. (2014) The Use of Antibiotics on Small Dairy Farms in Rural Peru. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 113, 88-95. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.10.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bochniarz, M., Wawron, W. and Szczubia?, M. (2013) Resistance to Methicillin of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci (CNS) Isolated from Bovine Mastitis. Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 16, 687-692. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/pjvs-2013-0097 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.62214-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Taponen, S. and Pyorala, S. (2009) Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci as Cause of Bovine Mastitis—Not So Different from Staphylococcus aureus? Veterinary Microbiology, 134, 29-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.09.011</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>