<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JWARP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Water Resource and Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1945-3094</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jwarp.2015.717117</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JWARP-61881</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Physico-Chemical and Oxygen-Hydrogen Isotopic Assessment of Bagmati and Bishnumati Rivers and the Shallow Groundwater along the River Corridors in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>abin</surname><given-names>Malla</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sarita</surname><given-names>Shrestha</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Saroj</surname><given-names>K. Chapagain</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Maneesha</surname><given-names>Shakya</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Takashi</surname><given-names>Nakamura</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Center of Research for Environment, Energy and Water (CREEW), Kathmandu, Nepal</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Interdisciplinary Centre for River Basin Environment (ICRE), University of Yamanashi, Kofu, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Environmental Engineering and Management, Asian Institute of Technology, Klong Luang, Thailand</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>rabin@creew.org.np(AM)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>12</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>17</issue><fpage>1435</fpage><lpage>1448</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>29</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>11</month>	<year>December</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>14</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The direct dumping of solid wastes into the rivers, discharge of industrial effluents together with direct discharge of domestic sewage have excessively polluted the major rivers Bagmati and Bish-numati. Groundwater along these river corridors is also affected from pollution of these rivers. Two major rivers: Bagmati and Bishnumati and shallow tube wells adjacent to these rivers were monitored for 2 years. Samples were analysed for the stable isotopes of hydrogen and oxygen (δD and δ18O) and selected physico-chemical parameters to investigate the possible interrelationship between river water and shallow groundwater along these river corridors. The physico-chemical values revealed that shallow groundwater and river water along the Bishnumati River corridor were heavily mineralized due to direct discharge of sewage wastes into this river. The isotope compositions of river water and shallow groundwater clustered together revealed possible interrelationship between them. Some of the isotopic compositions of groundwater and river water deviated below the Local Meteoric Water Line (LMWL) indicating that the water has undergone evaporation. The isotopic and chemical results suggested possible interrelationship between river water and groundwater. Fractional contribution of the river water to groundwater was calculated based on isotopic data using mass balance approach. Results showed that shallow groundwater SG1, along the Bagmati River corridor (in September 2013), was composed of approximately 30% - 40% Bagmati River water. Similarly, shallow groundwater SG5 of Bishnumati River corridor (in September 2013), was composed of approximately 45% - 50% river water. This result indicated that high portion of river water mixed-up with adjoining shallow groundwater along the river corridors. Further, the mix-up of the river water with groundwater can be harmful when rivers are polluted. These findings can be useful for a better understanding of hydrogeological processes at the river-aquifer interface and eventually benefit water management of the Kathmandu Valley in future.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Bagmati River</kwd><kwd> Bishnumati River</kwd><kwd> Groundwater</kwd><kwd> Interrelationship</kwd><kwd> Kathmandu Valley</kwd><kwd> Stable Isotopes</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Groundwater and surface water are the major resources for drinking, domestic and industrial uses in Kathmandu Valley. About 50% of the urban water supply in the Kathmandu Valley is derived from groundwater sources which include the shallow and deep aquifers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref2">2</xref>] . In recent years, water demand of valley has been raised by increasing population and industrial activities. The current piped water supply demand in Kathmandu Valley is 350 million litres per day (MLD), but the combined supply of groundwater and surface water in the dry season is 67 MLD. Even the supply reaches only up to 140 MLD during wet season [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref2">2</xref>] . Excessive withdrawal of groundwater causes drawdown of groundwater that can result in intrusion of nearby river water causing pollution of groundwater source [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref4">4</xref>] . Besides, numerous uncontrolled waste disposal sites are located especially along the rivers where the highly permeable sediments of the riverbed pose a pollution risk to groundwater [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>Earlier studies have reported high levels of ammonia, iron and arsenic in the deep groundwater and E. coli and nitrate in shallow groundwater in the valley [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref5">5</xref>] . A study undertaken by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref6">6</xref>] found high nitrate-N concentrations (&gt;10 mg/L) in shallow groundwater particularly in the northern areas of the valley. The source of nitrate contamination for the shallow aquifers in Kathmandu Valley is reported mostly due to septic tanks, poorly managed sewer pipes and disposal of solid wastes. In addition, an investigation using nitrate-N and oxygen isotope concentrations to trace sources also revealed that human waste is the major source of nitrate contamination in the shallow groundwater of Kathmandu [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>Similarly, several previous studies have reported river water quality of Kathmandu Valley [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref9">9</xref>] . A study undertaken by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref9">9</xref>] examined the spatial-temporal variations and factors influencing the management of groundwater along a section of the Bagmati River corridor in the Kathmandu Valley. The results revealed that the biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) concentrations ranged from 8.41 to 29.74 mg/L, 6.7 to 128.96 mg/L and 0.06 to 1.5 mg/L, respectively in urban areas.</p><p>Stable isotopes of water (δD and δ<sup>18</sup>O) are the important indicators of hydrological and ecological patterns [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref10">10</xref>] . The main applications of water isotopes are to trace water cycle, determine sources and components of surface water and groundwater flow and separate water sources, identify recharge source [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref11">11</xref>] , identify groundwater mixing and flow path [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref12">12</xref>] and assess surface and groundwater interrelationship [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>Groundwater and river water are two interconnected components of one single resource and impacts on either of these components will inevitably affect the quantity or quality of the other [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref13">13</xref>] . Hydrological interaction between surface water and groundwater can be understood in terms of groundwater recharge and discharge [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref14">14</xref>] . It is important to know such relationship, however, to our knowledge; there have been no such previous studies in Kathmandu Valley. Few studies on radioactive isotopes such as; <sup>36</sup>Cl, (n = 6) for determining age of water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref15">15</xref>] , δ<sup>18</sup>O and δD for determination of shallow groundwater recharge altitudes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref11">11</xref>] , δ<sup>15</sup>N and δ<sup>18</sup>O of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402720x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for identification of nitrate sources [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref4">4</xref>] were carried out in Kathmandu Valley. However, the use of stable isotope (δ<sup>18</sup>O and δD) has not been specifically undertaken to understand the interrelationship between river water and groundwater along the river corridor areas and contribution of river water to the groundwater in Kathmandu valley. Therefore, this research paper employed stable isotopes (δ<sup>18</sup>O and δD), Na<sup>+</sup> and Cl<sup>−</sup> ions and other selected physico-chemical parameters for the monthly analysis of river waters and shallow groundwater at the river corridors for 2 years with twin objectives to 1) assess the anthropogenic influence on the physico-chemical water quality of rivers and shallow groundwater and 2) assess the contribution of river waters to the shallow groundwater.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Area</title><p>The study area consisted of Bagmati and Bishnumati River corridors of the Kathmandu Valley. The valley is a bowl-shaped intramontane basin located in the central Nepal. The valley covers an area of about 665 km<sup>2</sup> which is surrounded by mountain ranges with elevations up to 2800 m above mean sea level [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref3">3</xref>] . Kathmandu basin was formed by uplift of the surrounding mountain ranges and was filled by Mid-Pliocene to Holocene fluvio-lacu- strine deposits that overlay Precambrian to Devonian metamorphic basement rocks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref16">16</xref>] . The mineral composition of the basin is dominated by quartz, K-feldspar, plagioclase and mica with minor chlorite and calcite [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref17">17</xref>] .</p><p>Kathmandu Valley has humid sub-tropical climate, which is largely affected by the monsoon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref17">17</xref>] . Average precipitation is about 1755 mm/year with 80% of rain falling during the summer monsoon between June and September [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref3">3</xref>] . Surface hydrology in Kathmandu Valley is governed by the Bagmati River system which originates in the Shivapuri Mountains to the north of the valley and discharges to the south of the watershed. This consists of two main groundwater aquifers, shallow and deep aquifers that are separated by a clay aquitard of up to 200 m thickness [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref11">11</xref>] . Based on the hydrogeological similarities, the basin is classified into 3 major groundwater districts: northern, central and southern groundwater district [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref18">18</xref>] . The underlying deposits of northern groundwater district are composed of unconsolidated, permeable materials consisting of micaceous quartz, sand and gravel. The central groundwater district sediment is dominated with a thick black clay layer; which is overlain by fluvial originated fine to medium sand, silt, intercalated clay and fine gravels. The southern groundwater districts possess thick clay layer however parts of the zone (eastern area of this district) are covered with sand and gravel [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>Bagmati River is an important tributary of the Ganges and has catchment area of 3710 km<sup>2</sup> in Nepal. The river has religious and cultural significance which in fact is known as Bagmati Civilization. Bagmati River corridor is the principal resource base of municipal water in the valley, which constitutes water supply to almost 92% in wet season and 60% in the dry season. Main sources of water in Bagmati River are rainfall and natural springs. The recorded discharge at Jorpati during wet season is 3.44 m<sup>3</sup>/sec [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>Bishnumati River, one of the tributaries of the Bagmati River, is also part of the Bagamati Civilization. The river flows between the altitudes of 2481 m (the origin in the Shivapuri hills) and 1289 m (confluence with the Bagmati River at Teku). The recorded mean monthly flow of this river at Teku is 0.72 m<sup>3</sup>/sec in March (minimum) and 16.62 m<sup>3</sup>/sec in August (maximum) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref8">8</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Sampling and Analysis</title><p>A monitoring network was designed along the Bagmati and Bishnumati River corridors for two years (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Three river water samples: R1, R2 and R3 were collected from three different sections (approximately 500 m apart) along the Bagmati River (at Jorpati reach). Three groundwater samples G1, G2 and G3 were collected from the adjacent shallow tube wells along this river. Similarly, three river water samples: R4, R5 and R6 were collected from Bishnumati River (at Manamaiju reach). Four groundwater samples: G4, G5, G6 and G7 were collected from the surrounding tube wells along this river (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Water samples from each source were collected monthly from May 2012 to June 2014.</p><p>The water samples collected in polyethylene bottles (250 mL) were rinsed 3 times with the sample water and kept immediately in an ice box. The global positioning system (GPS) was recorded for all the sampling locations.</p><p>Some of the physico-chemical parameters of the water samples were measured following standard methods and instruments as listed in the <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. Stable isotope analysis were performed using water equilibration system (Sercon, WES) and isotope mass spectrometer (Sercon, Hydra 20 - 20) in the laboratory of the Interdisciplinary</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Study area with sampling points</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402720x8.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Information on water sampling location</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample ID</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Latitude</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Longitude</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Elevation (m)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Temporal sampling</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Shallow groundwater from Jorpati reach</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27˚43'25.7&quot;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85˚22'56&quot;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1340</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27˚43'19.4&quot;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85˚22'54.6&quot;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1336</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Monthly</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27˚43'20.9&quot;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85˚23'0.8&quot;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1310</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Bagmati River water samples</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27˚43'55&quot;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85˚23'5.5&quot;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1322</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27˚43'25.4&quot;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85˚22'58&quot;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1326</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Monthly</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27˚43'19.1&quot;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85˚22'56.1&quot;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1342</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Shallow groundwater from Manamaiju reach</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27˚45'4.1&quot;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85˚18'59.3&quot;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1305</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27˚44'50.6&quot;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85˚18'52.9&quot;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1325</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Monthly</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27˚44'55.8&quot;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85˚18'54.9&quot;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1292</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27˚44'46.2&quot;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85˚18'53.6&quot;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1313</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Bishnumati River water samples</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27˚45'3.9&quot;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85˚18'59.5&quot;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1302</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27˚44'50.6&quot;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85˚18'54.9&quot;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1315</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Monthly</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27˚44'46.1&quot;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85˚18'54.1&quot;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1314</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Note: SG―Shallow groundwater, R―River water.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Test parameters, methods of analysis and instruments used</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Unit</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Methods of analysis</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Instrument/Kit</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Physicochemical</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH meter</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Hanna Combo Tester, HI 98129</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Electrical conductivity (EC)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#181;S/cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Conductivity meter</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Salinity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dissolved Oxygen (DO)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DO meter</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DO meter, ID-100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NH<sub>4</sub>-N, NO<sub>3</sub>-N, NO<sub>2</sub>-N, PO<sub>4</sub>, COD, Fe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Water test kit and Digital Water Analyzer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pack Test by Kyoritsu Chemical-Check Lab; Corp. Japan, Digital Water Analyzer (Kyoritsu Water Analyzer, DPM-MT). Ammonia parameter was measured in UV-VIS Spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, UYmini-1240)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sup>+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >AAS Emission</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sercon WES</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cl<sup>−</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Argentometric method</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Isotope mass spectrometer (Sercon, Hydra 20-20)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Stable isotope analysis</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >δ<sup>18</sup>O, δD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >per mill (‰) units</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Water equilibrium system and isotope mass spectrometer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sercon, WES and Sercon, Hydra 20 - 20</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Centre for River Basin Environment (ICRE), University of Yamanashi, Japan. The analyses were standardized with the international references Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water (V-SMOW). For δ<sup>18</sup>O, 1 mL of each standard and samples were flushed for CO<sub>2</sub>, then left to equilibrate at 35˚C on the hot block in the WES for 8 hours before being analyzed. For δD, 1 mL of each standard and samples were transferred into individual exetainers containing platinum bead and flushed by H<sub>2</sub>. The samples were then left to equilibrate in a hot block WES for 3 hours at 35˚C analysis.</p><p>According to standard conventions, all isotopic compositions are given in per mill (‰) units and δ notation relative to the V-SMOW standard [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref19">19</xref>] .</p><p>δD or<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402720x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>‰</p><p>where R indicates the ration of <sup>2</sup>H/<sup>1</sup>H or <sup>18</sup>O/<sup>16</sup>O. Analytical uncertainties were &#177;0.1‰ for δ<sup>18</sup>O, and &#177;1‰ for δD.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Groundwater and River Water Chemistry</title><sec id="s3_1_1"><title>3.1.1. Groundwater Chemistry</title><p>A summary of the mean physicochemical parameters of the monthly sampling of the 2 years is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p><p>The pH of shallow groundwater was slightly acidic which ranged from 6 - 7.0. Electrical conductivity (EC) was highest (540 &#181;S/cm) in location SG5, water sample collected from Bishnumati River corridor. EC of water is due to the presence of dissolved ionic substances such as metallic ions, organic matters, and ammonium [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref20">20</xref>] . Dissolved Oxygen (DO) of shallow groundwater ranged from 1.5 mg/L to 6.0 mg/L. A DO level greater than 2 mg/L is required in order to prevent anaerobic conditions that can cause bad odors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref21">21</xref>] . The maximum limit for COD for most industrial uses and for environmental sustainability is 8 mg/L [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref21">21</xref>] . The shallow groundwater locations along the Bagmati and Bishnumati River corridors showed that the water quality exceeded the permissible limits for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402720x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-N and Fe as prescribed by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref22">22</xref>] drinking water quality standards; guideline levels for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402720x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>- N as NH<sub>3</sub> = 1.5 mg/L and Fe = 0.3 mg/L (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). Generally, the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402720x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-N contamination arises from human activities like waste disposal, fertilizer use, contaminated land and wastewater discharge. Also, the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402720x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-N concentration is produced naturally by mineralization of organic matter and sorption of metal oxide (i.e., Fe and Mn). The anthropogenic sources include waste disposal, fertilizer use, contaminated land and wastewater discharge [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref23">23</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref25">25</xref>] . Similar result was identified by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref26">26</xref>] which reported that the mean <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402720x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-N concentration in deep and shallow groundwater of Kathmandu Valley were 23.3 and 5.3 mg/L respectively.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Summary of physico-chemical parameters of shallow groundwater and river water</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >ID</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >pH</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >EC (&#181;S/cm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Salinity (mg/L)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >DO (mg/L)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402720x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-N (mg/L)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >NO<sub>3</sub>-N (mg/L)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >COD (mg/L)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >PO<sub>4</sub> (mg/L)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fe (mg/L)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cl<sup>−</sup> (mg/L)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sup>+</sup> (mg/L)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="12"  >Shallow groundwater along Bagmati River corridor</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >256</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >127</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >263</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >130</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >283</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >140</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="12"  >Shallow groundwater along Bishnumati River corridor</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >225</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >114</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >540</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >270</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >440</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >214</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >510</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >255</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="12"  >Bagmati River water samples</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >123</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >132</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >135</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="12"  >Bishnumati River water samples</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >214</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >109</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >263</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >131</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >293</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >141</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Note: EC: Electrical Conductivity, COD: Chemical Oxygen Demand, DO: Dissolved Oxygen. <sup>*</sup>Please note that all the parameter values are the mean values of the monthly sampling of the 2 years.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Range of physico-chemical parameters of shallow groundwater and river water</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Parameter</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Unit</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Shallow groundwater</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >River water</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >WHO 2004</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ave</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ave</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Max</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >SD</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5 - 8.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >EC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&#181;S/cm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >360</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >225</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >540</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >132.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >193.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >123</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >293</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1500</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Salinity</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >179</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >114</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >270</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >141</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402720x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5 as NH<sub>3</sub></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NO<sub>3</sub>-N</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.0 for total nitrogen</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >COD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PO<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4 - 5.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cl<sup>−</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >250</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sup>+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >mg/L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Note: Ave: average, Min: minimum, Max: maximum, SD: standard deviation.</p></sec><sec id="s3_1_2"><title>3.1.2. River Water Chemistry</title><p>As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, DO of river water ranged from 2.5 to 6.3 mg/L. As per Nepal Water Quality Guidelines for Aquaculture, DO levels in water should not drop below 5.0 mg/L, otherwise aquatic life is put under stress. The <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402720x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-N concentrations ranged from 0.8 to 4.0 mg/L. Nitrogen content must be less than 5 mg/L since higher concentration may affect sensitive plants and may contaminate groundwater [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref27">27</xref>] . The most common sources of nitrogen are industrial, human pollutions and fertilizers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref9">9</xref>] . The Cl<sup>−</sup> and Na<sup>+</sup> ions showed the pronounced effects of urbanization especially on the major ion chemistry of the Bishnumati River. The increasing trend of Cl<sup>−</sup> concentration from upstream to downstream (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) is because of pollution with anthropogenic activities. Chloride and sodium are major electrolytes in human urine [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref28">28</xref>] and are concentrated primarily in waste water. Sources of these ions in river and groundwater are related to human activities, effluent from industrial facilities and septic systems, and some agricultural chemicals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref29">29</xref>] . The physico-chemical values (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) indicated that the shallow groundwater and river water along the Bishnumati River corridor was highly mineralized than Bagmati River.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Characteristics of Na<sup>+</sup> and Cl<sup>− </sup></title><p>The sum of Na<sup>+</sup> and Cl<sup>−</sup> concentrations of river waters at sampling locations R1, R2 and R3 were nearly similar to the concentrations of shallow groundwater at SG1 during the months November 2012 to May 2013 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Similarly, the concentration was found similar to the concentration at sampling locations SG1, SG2 and SG3 during the months January to May 2014. The sum of Na<sup>+</sup> and Cl<sup>−</sup> concentrations of river water was high which reached up to 60 mg/L during the month of May 2014. However, these ions were found higher in shallow groundwater compared to river water.</p><p>Similarly, the Na<sup>+</sup> and Cl<sup>−</sup> concentrations of shallow groundwater and river water were similar during several months along the Bishnumati River corridor (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). The river water collected from Bishnumati River had high Na<sup>+</sup> and Cl<sup>−</sup> concentrations. It could be due to the discharge of a large amount of domestic waste water. The banks of the Bishnumati River have become provisional landfill sites. The uncontrolled dumping has severely contaminated the groundwater as well as river water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref8">8</xref>] .</p><p>The similar patterns of sum of Na<sup>+</sup> and Cl<sup>−</sup> concentrations in river waters and shallow groundwater collected from Bagmati and Bishnumati River corridors showed that there is possibility of interrelationship between these water sources.</p><p>The relationship of Na<sup>+</sup> and Cl<sup>−</sup> concentrations is used to identify groundwater origin and sources of the groundwater chemical constituents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref30">30</xref>] . The ratio of Na<sup>+</sup>/Cl<sup>−</sup> of river water and shallow groundwater samples</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Temporal distribution of sum of (Na + Cl) concentrations along the Bagmati River corridor</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402720x18.png"/></fig><p>were plotted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>. The ratio of Na<sup>+</sup> and Cl<sup>−</sup> nearly followed 1:1 ratio in river water (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.983). The natural sources of these ions are rock-water interactions, saline seeps, and minor atmospheric inputs. Other anthropogenic sources include: agricultural chemicals, effluent from private and municipal septic systems, animal waste [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref31">31</xref>] . However, Na<sup>+</sup> concentrations were comparatively higher than Cl<sup>−</sup> concentrations in shallow groundwater. High concentration of Na<sup>+</sup> irrespective to Cl<sup>−</sup> concentrations in shallow groundwater probably resulted from rock-water interactions with Na-clays and Na-feldspars present as silt-and sand-size fragments in the soil zone and aquifers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref31">31</xref>] .</p><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Temporal distribution of sum of (Na + Cl) concentrations along the Bishnumati River corridor</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402720x19.png"/></fig><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> A scatter diagram of Na<sup>+</sup> and Cl<sup>−</sup>. River water samples plotted along a line defined by NaCl; while shallow groundwater samples showed elevated Na<sup>+</sup> concentrations (<sup>*</sup>SGW―Shallow groundwater; RW―River water)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402720x20.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Stable Isotope Composition of Groundwater and River Water</title><p>The mean values of the isotopic composition (δ<sup>18</sup>O and δD) of shallow groundwater and river water are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>. The δ<sup>18</sup>O value of shallow groundwater ranged from −7.7‰ to −4.8‰; and δD from −69.8‰ to −49‰. The δ<sup>18</sup>O value of river water ranged from −7.5‰ to −4.4‰ and δD ranged from −71.3‰ to −49.6‰ respectively. The isotopically lightest for δ<sup>18</sup>O and δD in sample were −7.7‰ and −71.3‰, and the heaviest were −4.4‰ and −49‰ respectively.</p><p>The Global Meteoric Water Line (GMWL) was drawn using the following equation described by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref19">19</xref>]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61881-formula532"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402720x21.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The Local Meteoric Water Line (LMWL) published for Kathmandu Valley was used which was based on sampling of rain water during pre-monsoon and monsoon seasons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref32">32</xref>] .</p><p>The hydrogen and oxygen isotope values of groundwater and river water were plotted on reported LMWL for Kathmandu valley (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). The isotopic composition of the shallow groundwater nearby the Bagmati River corridor plots close to the LMWL. It revealed the rainwater as the possible source of this shallow groundwater. While the isotopic compositions of Bagmati River, Bishnumati River and Bishnumati shallow groundwater plotted below the LMWL in the plot, this indicated possible evaporation or mixing line. The main causes of variations in the stable isotope signature of water sources were natural variations in the isotopic composition of rainfall, mixing with pre-existing waters, and evaporation through soil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref34">34</xref>] . In addition, isotopic composition of river water and shallow ground water clustered together (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>) reflected existence of certain degree of interrelationship between river water and groundwater [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref14">14</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Seasonal Isotopic Variation in Groundwater and River Water</title><p>The <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> showed the seasonal isotopic compositions of shallow groundwater and river water during dry and wet seasons.</p><p>The isotopic compositions were clearly divided into three clusters.</p><p>Cluster 1: The isotopic composition of river water and shallow groundwater plotted on or nearby the LMWL.</p><p>Cluster 2: The isotopic composition of some of the shallow groundwater samples deviated from LMWL</p><p>Cluster 3: The isotopic composition of river water and shallow groundwater deviated from LMWL.</p><p>The deviation of isotopic compositions of river water and groundwater from the LMWL revealed water has undergone evaporation with systematic enrichment in stable isotope [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref35">35</xref>] . In contrast to this, previous studies investigated that none of the Kathmandu Valley rivers showed evidence for evaporation except for minor</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Average isotopic compositions of shallow groundwate and river water</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >ID</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average δ<sup>18</sup>O (‰)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average δD (‰)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Remarks</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−6.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−50.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Shallow groundwater along Bagmati River corridor</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−5.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−49</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−7.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−53.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−7.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−55.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >Shallow groundwater along Bishnumati River corridor</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−4.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−69.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−6.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−59.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SG7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−7.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−55.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−6.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−50.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Bagmati River water samples</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−7.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−52.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−6.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−49.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−7.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−53.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Bishnumati River water samples</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−4.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−71.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−7.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−53.9</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>*</sup>Please note that all the parameter values are the mean values of the monthly sampling of the 2 years.</p><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Relationship of δD and δ<sup>18</sup>O of the shallow groundwater and rivers with GMWL and LMWL</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402720x22.png"/></fig><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Stable isotopic composition of shallow groundwater and river water during dry season</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402720x23.png"/></fig><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> Stable isotopic composition of water during wet season</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402720x24.png"/></fig><p>catchments in the valley during monsoon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref36">36</xref>] . Such variation in isotope compositions of river water could be expected due to lack of natural river flow, whereas the river discharge in Kathmandu is usually influenced by anthropogenic activities such as discharge of domestic wastewater into river. It revealed that the sampling locations were more or less likely to be mixed with sewer water. Similar results were reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref31">31</xref>] in which most of the river water samples were plotted along a similar evaporation trend. Also, landfill leachate, septic effluent and animal wastes which have elevated δ<sup>18</sup>O values were also plotted along the evaporation trend. However, such effects could be detected using stable isotope ratios such as, δ<sup>15</sup>N, δ<sup>13</sup>C and δ<sup>34</sup>S [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref37">37</xref>] .</p><p>Similar pattern was seen in the isotopic composition of wet season of the river water and groundwater (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Relationship between δ<sup>18</sup>O and Cl<sup>−</sup></title><p>The relationship of chloride (Cl<sup>−</sup>) and stable isotope of oxygen (δ<sup>18</sup>O) in river water and groundwater was plotted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>. It showed a close range of δ<sup>18</sup>O and Cl<sup>−</sup> concentrations in shallow groundwater and river water, which indicated the possible hydraulic interaction between river water and shallow groundwater [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref38">38</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. Interrelationship between River Water and Groundwater</title><p>The physicochemical properties and isotopic compositions of the river water and groundwater revealed interrelationship existed between them. In addition, mass balance approach was used to find out the mixing contribution of river water into the shallow groundwater.</p><sec id="s3_6_1"><title>3.6.1. Case 1: Bagmati River Corridor</title><p>To determine the fractional contribution, let us take an example of shallow groundwater SG1 and river water from Bagmati River corridor. The SG1 seemed to be closely connected to the nearest river water as the groundwater had similar trends of stable isotope signatures with the river. The salient features of the isotope and Cl<sup>−</sup> concentration of shallow groundwater at SG1 were as follows. During pre monsoon period (April 2013), the δ<sup>18</sup>O and δD of shallow groundwater were −7.4‰ and −52.9‰ respectively. During the monsoon (September 2013), the δ<sup>18</sup>O and δD was found to be depleted (−8.3‰ and −56.5‰ respectively). In the same way, the Cl<sup>−</sup> concentration in September 2013, was also diluted to 5mg/l from 19 mg/L (in April 2013). That is because the recharge by river water via bank infiltration in September 2013, could be characterized by lower Cl<sup>−</sup> and relatively depleted δ<sup>18</sup>O and δD signatures.</p><p>Assuming that SG1 in September 2013 was a result of mixing original groundwater (GW) and river water (RW), the following equation can be used to assess the fractional contributions of river water to the groundwater [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61881-ref29">29</xref>] :</p><fig id="fig8"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref></label><caption><title> Relationship between Cl<sup>−</sup> and δ<sup>18</sup>O in groundwater and river water</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402720x25.png"/></fig><disp-formula id="scirp.61881-formula533"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/4-9402720x26.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where Cs is the δ<sup>18</sup>O (−8.3‰) or δD (−56.5‰) of the water sample (location SG1 in September 2013); C<sub>RW</sub> is the δ<sup>18</sup>O (−9.5‰) or δD (−65.3‰) of river water (location R1 in September 2013); and C<sub>GW</sub> is the δ<sup>18</sup>O (−7.4‰) or δD (−52.9‰) of shallow groundwater SG1 in April 2013.</p><p>The resulting fractional contribution percentages were 30% and 40% using δ<sup>18</sup>O and δD, respectively. Mixing calculations suggested that the shallow groundwater at SG1 of Bagmati River corridor in September 2013 was composed of approximately 30% - 40% Bagmati River water. This result showed that contamination of river water can reach into the groundwater if the river water is severely polluted.</p></sec><sec id="s3_6_2"><title>3.6.2. Case 2: Bishnumati River Corridor</title><p>Similarly, the Equation (1) was used to calcute fractional contribution of Bishnumati River to the shallow groundwater along this corridor. The sampling location SG5 seemed to have similar trends of stable isotope signatures with Bishnumati River was taken into consideration. The salient features of the isotope and hydrochemistry of shallow groundwater at SG5 are as follows. During pre-monsoon period (April 2013), the δ<sup>18</sup>O and δD of shallow groundwater were −4.4‰ and −72.2‰, respectively. During the monsoon (September 2013), the δ<sup>18</sup>O and δD was found to be depleted (−5.1‰ and −74.4‰ respectively).</p><p>Using the equation to assess the fractional contributions of river water to the shallow groundwater SG5 in September 2013:</p><p>Where Cs is the δ<sup>18</sup>O (−5.1‰) or δD (−74.4‰) of the water sample (location SG5 in September 2013); C<sub>RW</sub> is the δ<sup>18</sup>O (−5.9‰) or δD (−77.1‰) of river water (location R4 in September 2013); and C<sub>GW</sub> is the δ<sup>18</sup>O (−4.4‰) or δD (−72.2‰) of shallow groundwater SG5 in April 2013.</p><p>The resulting fractional contribution percentages were 45% and 47% using δ<sup>18</sup>O and δD, respectively. Mixing calculations suggested that SG5 of Bishnumati River corridor in September 2013 was composed of approximately 45% - 50% river water.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>The Bagmati and Bishnumati River corridors are facing environmental pressures, mainly from anthropogenic influences. The major findings of the study were:</p><p>1) The shallow groundwater along the Bagmati and Bishnumati River corridor were found to be contaminated with ammonium and iron. The physico-chemical values revealed that the shallow groundwater and river water along the Bishnumati River corridor were heavily mineralized compared to Bagmati River corridor due to direct discharge of sewage wastes into this river. The uncontrolled dumping severely contaminated the groundwater as well as river water. The similar temporal trend of Na<sup>+</sup> and Cl<sup>−</sup> concentrations of shallow groundwater and river water indicated the common source of origin of these ions in both groundwater and river. In addition, it revealed the possible interrelationship between these water sources.</p><p>2) The isotope compositions of river waters and shallow ground water clustered together reflected existence of possible interrelationship between them. The plot of seasonal isotopic compositions of water sources divided them into 3 clusters. Some of the isotopic compositions of water sources diverted from the LMWL which revealed that water has undergone evaporation with systematic enrichment in stable isotope. In addition, such variation in river water could be expected due to lack of natural river flow, which meant that rivers in our study were highly influenced by anthropogenic activities.</p><p>3) Fractional contributions of the river water to the groundwater were calculated based on isotopic data using mass balance approach. The shallow groundwater along the Bagmati River corridor (SG1) in September 2013 was composed of approximately 30% - 40% Bagmati River water. Similarly, SG5 of Bishnumati River corridor in September 2013 was composed of approximately 45% - 50% river water. This result indicated that high portion of river water mixed-up with adjoining shallow groundwater along the river corridors. Further, the mix-up of the river water with groundwater can be harmful when rivers are polluted.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We are thankful to Interdisciplinary Centre for River Basin Environment (ICRE), University of Yamanashi, Japan for their support and encouragement especially for the isotopic analysis. We also acknowledge Sarad Pathak from CREEW for his assistance during water sampling and analysis.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>RabinMalla,SaritaShrestha,Saroj K.Chapagain,ManeeshaShakya,TakashiNakamura, (2015) Physico-Chemical and Oxygen-Hydrogen Isotopic Assessment of Bagmati and Bishnumati Rivers and the Shallow Groundwater along the River Corridors in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Journal of Water Resource and Protection,07,1435-1448. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2015.717117</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.61881-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jha, M.G., Khadka, M.S., Shrestha, M.P., Regmi, S., Bauld, J. and Jacobson, G. (1997) The Assessment of Groundwater Pollution in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. A Report on Joint Nepal-Australia Project 1995-1996, Australian Geological Survey Organization, Canberra, 64.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khatiwada, N.R., Takizawa, S., Tran, T.V.N. and Inoue, M. (2002) Groundwater Contamination Assessment for Sustainable Water Supply in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Water Science and Technology, 46, 147-154.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pandey, V.P., Chapagain, S.K. and Kazama, F. (2010) Evaluation of Groundwater Environment of Kathmandu Valley. Environment Earth Sciences, 60, 1329-1342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0263-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shrestha, S., Nakamura, T., Yoneyyama, Y., Shrestha, S. and Kazama, F. (2013) Identification of Nitrate Sources in Rainwate of Kathmandu Valley: A Chemical and Stable Isotopic Approach. Journal of Water and Environment Technology, 11, 377-389. http://dx.doi.org/10.2965/jwet.2013.377</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Warner, N.R., Levy, J., Harpp, K. and Farruggia, F. (2008) Drinking Water Quality in Nepal’s Kathmandu Valley: A Survey and Assessment of Selected Controlling Site Characteristics. Hydrogeology Journal, 16, 321-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10040-007-0238-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pathak, D.R., Hiratsuka, A., Yamashiki, Y. (2011) Influence of Anthropogenic Activities and Seasonal Variation on Groundwater Quality of Kathmandu Valley Using Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Proceedings of the Symposium on Water Quality: Current Trends and Expected Climate Change Impacts, IUGG2011 in Melbourne, Australia, July 2011 (IAHS Publ. 348, 2011).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nakamura, T., Osaka, K., Chapagain, S.K., Nishida, K. and Kazama, F. (2010) Identification of Nitrate Sources in Shallow Groundwater of Kathmandu Valley, Nepal Using Nitrate Nitrogen and Oxygen Isotope. Paper Presented on Japan Geosciences Union Meeting 2010, May 2010, Chiba.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Devkota, D.C. and Watanabe, K. (2005) Impact of Solid Waste on Water Quality of Bishnumati River and Surrounding Areas in Kathmandu, Nepal. Journal of Nepal Geological Society, 31, 19-24.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kannel, P.R., Lee, S. and Lee, Y.S. (2008) Assessment of Spatial-Temporal Patterns of Surface and Ground Water Qualities and Factors Influencing Management Strategy of Groundwater System in an Urban River Corridor of Nepal. Journal of Environmental Management, 86, 595-604.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Weyhenmeyer, C.E., Burns, S.J. and Waber, H.N. (2002) Isotope Study of Moisture Sources, Recharge Areas, and Goundwater Flow Paths within the Eastern Batinah Coastal Plain, Sultanate of Oman. Water Resources Research, 38, 1184-1206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000WR000149</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Nakamura, T., Chapagain, S.K., Pandey, V.P., Osada, K., Nishida, K., Malla, S.S. and Kazama, F. (2012) Shallow Groundwater Recharge Altitudes in the Kathmandu Valley. In: Shrestha, S., Pradhananaga, D. and Pandey, V.P., Eds., Kathmandu Valley Groundwater Outlook, Asian Institute of Technology (AIT), The Small Earth Nepal (SEN), Center of Research for Environment Energy and Water (CREEW), International Research Center for River Basin Environment, University of Yamanashi (ICRE-UY), Kofu, 39-45.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Idowu</surname><given-names> O.A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2007</year>)<article-title>Hydrogeological Processes of Interaction between Surface Water and Groundwater—A Review</article-title><source> ASSET Series</source><volume> 6</volume>,<fpage> 172</fpage>-<lpage>190</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Winter, T.C. (1999) Relation of Streams, Lakes and Wetlands to Groundwater Flow Systems. Hydrogeology Journal, 7, 28-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s100400050178</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Song, X.F., Liu, X.C., Xia, J., Yu, J.J. and Tang, C.Y. (2006) A Study of Interaction between Surface Water and Groundwater Using Environmental Isotope in Huaisha River Basin. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 49, 1299-1310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11430-006-1299-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cresswell, R.G., Bauld, J., Jacobson, G., Khadka, M.S., Jha, M.G., Shrestha, M.P. and Regmi, S. (2001) A First Estimate of Ground Water Ages for the Deep Aquifer of the Kathmandu Basin, Nepal, Using the Radioisotope Chlorine-36. Ground Water, 39, 449-457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2001.tb02329.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gurung, J.K., Ishiga, H., Khadka, M.S. and Shrestha, N.R. (2007) The Geochemical Study of Fluvio-Lacustrine Aquifers in the Kathmandu Basin (Nepal) and the Implications for the Mobilization of Arsenic. Environmental Geology, 52, 503-517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00254-006-0483-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Paudel, M.R., Kuwahara, Y. and Sakai, H. (2004) Changes in Mineral Composition and Depositional Environments Recorded in the Present and Past Basin-Fill Sediments of the Kathmandu Valley, Central Nepal. Himalayan Journal of Science, 2, 222-223. http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/hjs.v2i4.912</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dixit, A. and Upadhya, M. (2005) Augmenting Groundwater in Kathmandu Valley: Challenges and Possibilities. Nepal Water Conservation Foundation, Kathmandu.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Criag, H. (1961) Standard for Reporting Concentrations of Deuterium and Oxygen-18 in Natural Waters. Science, 133, 1833-1834. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.133.3467.1833</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pant, B.R. (2011) Ground Water Quality in the Kathmandu Valley of Nepal. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 178, 477-485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1706-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">EMECS (2001) Water Quality Conservation for Enclosed Water Bodies in Japan 2001. International Center for the Environmental Management of Enclosed Coastal Seas (EMECS). http://www.emecs.or.jp/S</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">WHO (2004) Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality. Third Edition, Volume 1, World Health Organization, Geneva.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Buss, S.R., Herbert, A.W. and Morgan, P. (2004) A Review of Ammonium Attenuation in Soil and Groundwater. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 37, 347-359.http://dx.doi.org/10.1144/1470-9236/04-005http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Steven_Thornton/publication/245378357_A_review_of_ammonium_attenuation_in_soil_and_groundwater/links/54199cd90cf25ebee988773f.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fernando, T.W. and David, N.L. (2005) Non-Agricultural Sources of Groundwater Nitrate: A Review and Case Study. Water Research, 39, 3-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.07.026</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rao, N.S. (1998) Impact of Clayey Soils on Nitrate Pollution in the Groundwater of the Lower Vanisadhara River Basin. India Department of Geography, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Chapagain, S.K. and Kazama, F. (2012) Overview of Chemical Quality of Groundwater in the Kathmandu Valley. In: Shrestha, S., Pradhananaga, D. and Pandey, V.P., Eds., Kathmandu Valley Groundwater Outlook, Asian Institute of Technology (AIT), The Small Earth Nepal (SEN), Center of Research for Environment Energy and Water (CREEW), International Research Center for River Basin Environment, University of Yamanashi (ICRE-UY), Kofu, 49-55.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Environment Statistics of Nepal (2008) A Report Prepared by Government of Nepal. National Planning Commission Secretariat, Central Bureau of Statistics, Kathmandu.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kirchmann, H. and Pettersson, S. (1995) Human Urine—Chemical Composition and Fertilizer Use Efficiency. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 40, 149-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00750100</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yang, L., Song, X., Han, D., Zhang, B. and Long, D. (2012) Characterizing Interactions between Surface Water and Groundwater in the Jialu River Basin Using Major Ion Chemistry and Stable Isotopes. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16, 4265-4277. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-4265-2012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, X., Zhang, L. and Hou, X. (2008) Use of Hydrogeochemistry and Environmental Isotopes for Evaluation of Groundwater in Qingshuihe Basin, Northwestern China. Hydrogeology, 16, 335-348.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10040-007-0269-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Panno, S.V., Hackley, K.C., Hwang, H.H., Greenberg, S.E., Krapac, I.G., Landsberger, S. and O’kelly, D.J. (2006) Characterization and Identification of Na-Cl Sources in Ground Water. Ground Water, 44, 176-187.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2005.00127.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jenkins, D.T., Sharma, C.K. and Hasset, J.M. (1987) A Stable Isotope Reconnaissance of Groundwater Resources in the Kathmandu Valley. Poster Session Presented at on Symposium on Isotope Techniques International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kendall, C. and McDonnell, J.J. (1998) Isotope Tracers in Watershed Hydrology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 839 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Negrel, P., Pauwels, H., Dewandel, B., Gandolfi, J.M., Mascre, C. and Ahmed, S. (2011) Understanding Groundwater Systems and Their Functioning through the Study of Stable Water Isotopes in a Hard-Rock Aquifer (Maheshwaram Watershed, India). Journal of Hydrology, 397, 55-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.11.033</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yeh, H.F., Lin, H.I., Lee, C.H., Hsu, K.C. and Wu, C.S. (2014) Identifying Seasonal Groundwater Recharge Using Environmental Stable Isotopes. Water, 6, 2849-2861. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w6102849</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gajurel, A.P., Lanord, C.F., Huyghe, P., Guilmette, C. and Gurung, D. (2006) C and O Isotope Compositions of Modern Fresh-Water Mollusc Shells and River Waters from Himalaya and Ganga Plain. Chemical Geology, 233, 1-2.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2006.03.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Morrissey, C.A., Boldt, A., Mapston, A., Newton, J. and Ormerod, S.J. (2013) Stable Isotopes as Indicator of Wastewater Effects on the Macroinvertebrates of Urban Rivers. Hydrobiologia, 700, 231-244.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1233-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61881-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Onodera, S., Kitaoka, K., Hayashi, M., Shindo, S. and Kusakabe, M. (1995) Evaluation of the Groundwater Recharge Process in a Semi Arid Region of Tanzania, Using &amp;delta;D and &amp;delta;&lt;sup&gt;18&lt;/sup&gt;O. Application of Tracers in Arid Zone Hydrology (Proceeding of the Vienna Symposium, August 1994), IAHS Publication No. 232, 67-78.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>