<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJEE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Energy Efficiency</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2169-2637</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojee.2015.44008</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJEE-61751</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Engineering</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Generation of Electric Power from Domestic Cooking System
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>yed</surname><given-names>Ali Raza Shah</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zahoor</surname><given-names>Ahmed</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bashir</surname><given-names>Ahmed Leghari</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wazir</surname><given-names>Muhammad Laghari</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Attaullah</surname><given-names>Khidrani</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Mechanical Engineering, Balochistan University of Engineering and Technology, Khuzdar, Pakistan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Electrical Engineering, Balochistan University of Engineering and Technology, Khuzdar, Pakistan</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>razadopasi@gmail.com(YARS)</email>;<email>zahoor@buetk.edu.pk(ZA)</email>;<email>baleghari@gmail.com(BAL)</email>;<email>niaz1111@yahoo.com(WML)</email>;<email>atta_khidrani@yahoo.com(AK)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>24</day><month>11</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>04</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>69</fpage><lpage>76</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>19</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>4</month>	<year>December</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>7</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   This study work related with floating of an idea about conversion of reclaimed thermal energy from domestic cooking system into the electrical power. There were different techniques in use worldwide for harnessing the energy into the appropriate useful work and also to create efficient system for the energy conversion process. The ignorance in this regard might be due to the reason that this wastage did not cost too much for a single home on per day or per month basis, but it could be a ample amount of cost if integrated this loss for a whole city or on yearly bases for a single home. The idea in this work depended upon the recovery of waste heat from Pressure Cookers used in the houses for the domestic cooking purposes, and optimized the reclaimed thermal energy for the conversion into electric power. This research work related with losses of energy discussed and analyzed on the basis of thermo dynamically regarding (a) the wastage of thermal energy escaped through the system due to the spreading of exhaust vapors and taking away significant amount of thermal energy; (b) losses of enthalpy through the dissipate steam; (c) heat losses in the tubing from the Pressure Cooker to the turbine; (d) electric power produces from the system. In this work, new methods were advised, in order to reduce the losses of thermal energy from the system. It would open the venue for researchers to promote this new idea in near future. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Waste Heat</kwd><kwd> Pressure Cooker</kwd><kwd> Thermal Energy</kwd><kwd> Electric Power</kwd><kwd> Enthalpy Losses</kwd><kwd> Steam Turbine</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The every nation desires for self-sufficient in the sector of energy, as it plays a vital role in the economic development either in industrial area or in the domestic use. More over the rising in grassroots population throughout the world, it will adversely affect the resources and develops pressure on the basic amenities. They also rely on the energy sector for their likely-hood in future. Hence, demand of energy is increasing day by day. In order to over- come this issue and fulfill the requirement of energy demand in future, proper planning and development activities can be started in every sector immediately. The idea in this work depends upon the recovery of waste heat from the Pressure Cooker which uses in the houses for daily domestic cooking purpose, and optimizes the reclaimed thermal energy for the electric power [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61751-ref1">1</xref>] . Pressure Cooker dissipates the high temperature steam continuously during the entire process. The exhausted steam is more appropriately used to convert the enthalpy of the steam into electrical power energy through De-Laval’s turbine (a single stage, single nozzle steam turbine), and it is used for convenience in manufacturing. This set-up can be applied to the systems where cooking done on larger scales continuously like hotels and food companies, but it is not feasible to be adopted at domestic level because turbine alternator set-up makes the system complex and bulky [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61751-ref2">2</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Design Procedure</title><p>The waste exhausted heat recovered from the Pressure Cooker was used for optimizing the efficiency of system and utilized the reclaimed thermal energy for conversion in to the electric power for specified given data. In this work study was focused upon the Pressure Cooker used for cooking food stuff or heating the potable water in the house daily. The calculation related with its design procedure is discussed as under.</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Energy Available in the Fuel Gaseous</title><p>The fuel gas liberated an amount of energy in the form of fuel consumption rate by unit time from natural gas to the burner of Pressure Cooker. The measuring unit of energy is Joule or KJ and in case of gas consumed per unit time then it will be considered as KW [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61751-ref2">2</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61751-formula522"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In the above equation <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is equivalent to the rate of fuel consumption per time and measured in KW.</p><p>While: <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>= Mass flow rate in Kg/sec:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61751-formula523"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x9.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The calorific value of any substance is to be considered to the heating value of that material. The quantity of heat liberated during the process of combustion for any of fuel; and measuring unit for energy/unit of time for the particular substance such as MJ/Kg. The various fuels have different calorific values as indicated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61751-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>The Natural gas has methane (CH4) 85% to 90% as an ingredient, while the remaining other particles depends upon ethane, butane, propane, nitrogen, and CO<sub>2</sub> etc. Hence it is clear from <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> that the Natural gas has Calorific value near about (55.5 MJ/Kg) as per consideration on the basis of methane. Since natural gas is not available in pure form and having sufficient amount of impurities and also keeping the other losses under consideration. Then it will be considered that the natural gas about 70% of its original mass will be available for the design calculation, hence the calorific value of natural gas is as under:</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Calorific values of common fuels</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Type of Fuel</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MJ/Kg</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hydrogen</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >141.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Methane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ethane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Propane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Butane</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gasoline</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diesel</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coal</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 - 27</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><disp-formula id="scirp.61751-formula524"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x10.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The study was carried out through practical conduction on the gas cylinder. The gas cylinder was placed over the digital weight meter and fuel consumptions were observed after expiry of ten 10 seconds. The data was analyzed as per consumed mass of fuel per unit time. Hence the rate of fuel consumption was the actual power produced by the gas fuel for the burner. The <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> was recorded during practical. Putting the calculated values in Equation (1), then the energy in the form of power calculated as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61751-formula525"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x12.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Losses of Energy from the System</title><p>It was apparently revealed that without the economizing arrangement; the small amount of thermal energy was lost due to the absorption by the system and operating pressure vary from 3 - 9 KPa during the process. It is clear from <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> that the power released by the fuel gas supplied to the furnace amounting to (8.574 KW). Similarly on other hand the power losses by evaporation was (2.136 - 2.406 KW) as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>The efficiency in percentage wise for the system without doing any economic planning can be estimated as mentioned below [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61751-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61751-formula526"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x13.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61751-formula527"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x14.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Hence, losses of thermal energy/second will be:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61751-formula528"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x15.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>It is clear from the above discussion that 6.168 KJ of energy lost by each second from the system; therefore efficiency reduced to 28.15%, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, but that is very low, so it can be enhanced.</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Power consumption rate</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x16.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Thermal properties of steam</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Input <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> KW</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pressure P<sub>gauge</sub> KP<sub>a</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pressure P<sub>abs</sub> KP<sub>a</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Saturation Temp&#233;rature T<sub>sat</sub> ˚C</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Enthalpy Vapor H<sub>g</sub> K<sub>J</sub>/K<sub>g</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mass Flow <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Power of Steam <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>KW</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >8.574</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.469</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2673.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.406</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.853</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2670.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.136</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Steps Suggested for Improvement of Efficiency</title><p>In order to improve the efficiency of the system; the under mentioned steps are suggested keeping some economical arrangements in the system.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Insulation of the System</title><p>It is proposed that to collect the energy of flue gases from the domestic Pressure Cooker at home then insulation may be provided in the system. It was suggested that a metallic shell with area considerably greater than the covered area of the burner including Pressure Cooker be fabricated around it. The maximum temperature will be in the space within the shell and between the walls of the Pressure Cooker, that will helps to raise the temperature up to the maximum level. The energy of flue gases can be trapped and utilized for heating the cooker. The external insulation of burner including pan with shell will prevent the loss of heat transfer through mode of conduction and convection to atmosphere as seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61751-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>The influence of temperature and color of flame vary with type of fuel involved for combustion process. The variable absolute temperature values for different fuels react with air or O<sub>2</sub> during the combustion process are mentioned below in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p><p>The color of flames are depends upon the molecular constituents of the fuels. It is not necessary that the blue colored flames are every time considered to be scorching than yellow colored flames [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61751-ref5">5</xref>] . A light yellow flame causes the losses of heat to some level instead of blue flame, in order to overcome the losses and try to make the system efficient; then make arrangement for a decent sharp blue colored flame for the system. The orifice of nozzles for the burner must be fabricated considering the back pressure including the feeding rate of the fuels. In order to accomplish the good hot flame for the system; then make arrangement for efficient supply of fuel. Then domestically system became efficient by adopting these all above mentioned arrangement collectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>).</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> View of metallic shell for burner</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x20.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Common temperature (K) values for different fuels</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Types of Fuels</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Temperature in Kelvin</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acetylene in oxygen</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3410</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Heptane in oxygen</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hydrogen in oxygen</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3080</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Methane in oxygen</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3053</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Acetylene in air</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2600</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hydrogen in air</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2400</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Heptane in air</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2290</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Methane in air</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2232</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Light yellow flame</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x21.png"/></fig><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Blue flames</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x22.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Measuring Vapor Pressure</title><p>Here in this case the fuel gas supplied to the burner for providing the heat energy to the Pressure Cooker for evaporation process. A vapor pressure was measured through pressure gauge installed over the Pressure Cooker for getting the gauge pressure instantly. The Pressure Cooker shut down during the process of recording the value of gauge pressure. These recorded readings of pressure gauge were used for analysis the efficiency of the system. The online SPIRAX SPARCO calculator was used to find out other related properties such as flow rate of mass and power output etc. for steam tables as given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61751-ref6">6</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Improvement in Efficiency of the System</title><p>The Pressure Cooker is used for cooking the food stuff everywhere including towns as well as in big cities. In these systems there are many chances for losses of thermal energy from the surrounding and system became inefficient and uneconomical for the use of domestic purposes. The system has efficiency within the range of 20% - 30%. The economizing arrangements were made and calculated as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>. The output power without the economizing arrangement was ranging from 2.136 to 2.406 KW as calculated power supplied was 8.547 under operating pressures between 3 - 9 KPa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61751-ref7">7</xref>] . The exact calculation of reclaimed thermal energy is almost impossible due to the involvement of analysis of flue gases with variation in flame shapes. Therefore readings were directly obtained through software and observed with economizing arrangement under operating pressure that was 50.5 to 60.5 KPa having corresponding output powers between 4.303 - 4.847 KW. The new efficiency of the system can be improved up to:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61751-formula529"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x23.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Energy Analyses</title><p>The energy produced was not much enough in amounts. However, it was a useful for analyzing steam conditions</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Net effect after making the economizing arrangement</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >S. No.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >A</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >B</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >C</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gauge Pressure P<sub>gauge</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Steam Mass Flow m∙Kg/Sec</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Steam Power <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> KW</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >275.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0052</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >220.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0042</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >170.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0035</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.514</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0028</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.583</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0024</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.488</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0018</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.847</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.303</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.216</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0011</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.946</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.674</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0009</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.406</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.136</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>for requirement of turbine design [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61751-ref8">8</xref>] . Moreover, the Wattmeter was attached with the alternator that provided the output parameters, which shows the effectiveness of the arrangements. The initial reading on the pressure gauge with the final reading on the wattmeter was used for calculations and it was included in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. Since frictional and conductional losses from the exit point of steam from the Pressure Cooker to the turbine and alternator were neglected. Energy consumed to form steam by evaporating water was treated as the useful work of the system. Steam exhausted from the Pressure Cooker was the only output parameter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61751-ref9">9</xref>] . The amount of the heat absorbed by the system and the efficiency of the system was improved by adopting the economizing arrangement on it. The study required to check the possibility of converting the steam enthalpy into electrical power by using a single nozzle De-Laval’s Turbine as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>. Laval developed a nozzle in 1890 in order to increase the working of the kinetic energy of the steam, rather than its pressure for steam jet to the supersonic speed.</p><p>The wattmeter reading practically finds out the efficiency of the whole mechanism. At the peak pressure conditions, the theoretical power output of the turbo-generated was estimated 347.10 W; but practically it came out 131.898W on the wattmeter as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>.</p><p>The overall efficiency of tubing, nozzle, turbine and alternator calculated as under</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61751-formula530"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x25.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This percentage is applied to all the values of the shaft power to calculate the actual output. The result shows that loss of 62% of available energy across the power generation setup that was obviously a result of non-pro- fessionalism and manufacturing limitations within the remote area.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Design Configuration of Steam Turbine</title><p>1. Power supplied by the Gaseous Fuel <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>2. Absolute pressure <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>3. Saturation temperature <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>4. Mass flow rate of steam <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>5. Enthalpy of saturated vapor <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>6. Specific volume of saturated vapor <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>7. Velocity of the steam outlet <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Energy conversion arrangements</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x33.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Power output over shaft and in watt-meter</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Final Pressure P<sub>2</sub> KP<sub>a</sub><sub> </sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Final Temp&#233;rature T<sub>2</sub> ˚C<sub> </sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Final Enthalpy H<sub>g2</sub> KJ/Kg</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Power at Shaft KW</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Power on Watt-meter KW</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >182.092</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >117.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2682.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >347.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >131.898</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >171.738</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >115.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2681.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >271.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103.265</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>8. Diameter of Jet <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>9. Area of Jet <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>10. Thermal power at steam outlet <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>11. Specific heat at constant pressure of steam <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> convergent nozzle used</p><p>12. Kinetic energy of the steam before the nozzle: <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>13. Initial Mach number: <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>14. Velocity of steam beyond nozzle (28.57% converged): <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>15. Kinetic energy of the steam beyond the nozzle <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>16. Enthalpy of the steam beyond the nozzle <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>17. Temperature of the steam beyond the nozzle <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>18. Pressure drop through the nozzle <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>19. Mach number of the steam beyond the nozzle <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>20. Velocity of blade to the velocity of steam jet <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>21. Angle of blade <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><sup> </sup></p><p>22. Specific heat ratio <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>23. Volume of the rim V = 0.000113 m<sup>3</sup></p><p>24. Weight of the rim: W = 564.6723 gm</p><p>25. Blade height: h = 7 mm</p><p>26. Inlet angle <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>27. Outlet angle <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>28. Blade width: = 10 mm</p><p>29. Radius of curvature of the blade <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>30. Third angle of blade <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>31. Area of blade <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>32. Circumference of the Rim: <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>33. Number of blades = 45</p><p>34. Total mass of blades = 59.861 gm</p><p>35. Total mass of the turbine = 624.533 gm</p><p>36. Corresponding power at the shaft = 347.10 W</p><p>37. Diameter of shaft = 2.269 mm</p><p>38. Permissible Shear stress <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>39. Bending stress (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) for the Shaft = 80 <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-2650072x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>40. Length of shaft = 0.015 mm</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>7. Conclusion</title><p>This study work will address the problem for reclaiming of waste heat energy from the domestic Pressure Cooker used for cooking system and converts the same into the electric power. The efficiency of system is improved through proposed process and suggests to optimize the domestic cooking system for achieving the better efficiency and to save the thermal energy for future requirement.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors acknowledge the chairman and Incharge of Laboratories section, Mechanical Engineering Department, Balochistan University of Engineering &amp; technology, Khuzdar, for providing the laboratory facilities.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Syed AliRaza Shah,ZahoorAhmed,Bashir AhmedLeghari,Wazir MuhammadLaghari,AttaullahKhidrani, (2015) Generation of Electric Power from Domestic Cooking System. Open Journal of Energy Efficiency,04,69-76. doi: 10.4236/ojee.2015.44008</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.61751-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Domestic Waste Water Heat Recovery Device.&lt;/br&gt;http://www.pera.com/website/clientsandcasestudies/creatingnewproductideas/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61751-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, L.B., Fu, L. and Jiang, Y. (2010) Application of an Exhaust Heat Recovery System for Domestic Hot Water. Journal of Energy, 35, 1476-1413. &lt;/br&gt;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2009.12.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61751-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">De Paepe, M. and Theun, E. (2003) Heat Recovery System for Dishwashers. Journal of Applied Thermal Engineering, 23, 743-756. &lt;/br&gt;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1359-4311(03)00016-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61751-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lukitobudi, R., Akbarzadeh, A., Johnson, P.W. and Hendy, P. (1995) Design, Construction and Testing of a Thermo syphon Heat Exchanger for Medium Temperature Heat Recovery in Bakeries. Journal of Heat Recovery Systems and CHP, 15, 481-491. &lt;/br&gt;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0890-4332(95)90057-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61751-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Colangelo, G., de Risi, A. and Laforgia, D. (2006) Experimental Study of a Burner with High Temperature Heat Recovery System for TPV Applications. Journal of Energy Conversion and Management, 47, 1192-1206. &lt;/br&gt;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2005.07.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61751-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">www.SPIRAXSPARCO.com</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61751-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Noie-Baghban, S.H. and Majideian, G.R. (2000) Waste Heat Recovery Using Heat Pipe Heat Exchanger (HPHE) for Surgery Rooms in Hospitals. Journal of Thermal Engineering, 20, 1271-1282. &lt;/br&gt;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1359-4311(99)00092-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61751-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El-Baky, M.A.A. and Mohamed, M.M. (2007) Heat Pipe Heat Exchanger for Heat Recovery in Air Conditioning. Journal of Applied Thermal Engineering, 27, 795-801. &lt;/br&gt;http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2006.10.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61751-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">W.J. Kearton in His Book “Steam Turbine Theory and Practice”.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>