<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2015.619297</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-61746</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Micronutrient Status in Soil of Central India
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>hageshwar</surname><given-names>Singh Patel</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Santosh</surname><given-names>Chikhlekar</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shobhana</surname><given-names>Ramteke</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bharat</surname><given-names>Lal Sahu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nohar</surname><given-names>Singh Dahariya</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Reetu</surname><given-names>Sharma</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>School of Studies in Chemistry/Environmental Science, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur, India</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>02</day><month>12</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>19</issue><fpage>3025</fpage><lpage>3037</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>7</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>4</month>	<year>December</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>7</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Two major issues, i.e. large crop productions and huge anthropogenic activities (e.g. fuel burning and mineral roasting) disturb the micronutrient balance in the soil of India. In this work, the available and total status of eight micronutrients i.e. Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn, Co, Ni, Mo, and S of the soils in the most urbanized area: Raipur area, Chhattisgarh, India (extending over ≈ 2 &#215; 104 km2) is described. The available status of micronutrients i.e. Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn, Co, Ni, Mo and SO
  <sub>4</sub>
  <sup style="margin-left:-6px;">2-</sup> in the soils (n = 100) was ranged from 30 - 8253, 205 - 2800, 2.0 - 8.1, 0.7 - 5.0, 2.2 - 31.2, 0.1 - 13.4, 0.1 - 8.9 and 41 - 747 mg/kg with mean value of (at 95% probability) 642 &#177; 186, 1178 &#177; 119, 4.3 &#177; 0.3, 2.3 &#177; 0.2, 12.8 &#177; 1.3, 3.9 &#177; 0.6, 1.5 &#177; 0.3 and 281 &#177; 25 mg/kg, respectively. The concentration variations, deficiencies and toxicities of the micronutrients in the soil are discussed.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Soil</kwd><kwd> Micronutrient</kwd><kwd> Available</kwd><kwd> Total Content</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The micronutrients i.e. Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn, Co, Ni, Mo, and S in soil play a very important role in plant growth, productivity, soil fertility and animal nutrition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61746-ref1">1</xref>] . The main functions of the micronutrients in living organism are structural components of cell constituents and its metabolically active compounds, in the maintenance of cellular organization, in energy transformation, in enzyme action, etc. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61746-ref2">2</xref>] . The increment in nutrient supply beyond a certain limit resulting in the decreased yield of plants is often be associated with the production of specific toxic effects [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61746-ref3">3</xref>] . The incidence of micronutrient deficiencies in soil and plants is increasing due to high and multiple plant yields. The quantification of both total and available (active form) of nutrients in soil is important [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61746-ref4">4</xref>] . The main sources of micronutrients in soils are rock weathering and atmospheric deposition in form of dust, precipitates, volatile compounds, etc. The micronutrients in soil occur in different chemical forms i.e. water soluble, exchangeable, specifically adsorbed, chelated or complexed, secondary clay minerals or oxide, primary minerals, etc. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61746-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>Their available contents were leached out from soil with various extractants i.e. diethylenetriaminepenta acetic acid (DTPA), ammonium bicarbonate-DTPA (AB-DTPA), triethanolamine-DTPA (TEA-DTPA), Mehlich-1 (0.05 N HCl + 0.025 N H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>), Mehlich-3 (0.2 N CH<sub>3</sub>COOH + 0.25 N NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub> + O.O15 N NH<sub>4</sub>F + 0.013 N HNO<sub>3</sub> + 0.001 M EDTA), acid ammonium acetate-EDTA (AAA-EDTA), MgCl<sub>2</sub>, HCl (0.05 N), HNO<sub>3</sub> (0.31 N), ammonium acetate, water, etc. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61746-ref6">6</xref>] . However, most of these extractants were suffered from some shortcoming i.e. unable to extract several trace elements present in soil, not always efficient for all nutrients, etc. Thus now a days, multi-nutrient extractants i.e. Mehlich-3, AB-DTPA, TEA-DTPA, acid ammonium acetate-EDTA etc. were widely used for the extraction of micronutrients and trace elements from the soils [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61746-ref6">6</xref>] . Among them, AB-DTPA and TEA-DTPA were claimed better extractant than Melich-3 for Zn and Cu, but they extracted only Zn, Cu, Mn, and Fe. However, the AAA-EDTA leached out several nutrients i.e. Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Al, Cd, Mo, Cr, Pb, Sr, P, etc. Ammonium oxalate, ammonium acetate, hot water, etc. were reported for the leaching of the available Mo from the soil. Of these oxalate is widely used for the extraction of available Mo from soil but it required prolonged extraction period (≈ 24 hr). The hot water extraction was recommended for leaching of the available Mo from the soil. Calcium chloride, Bray-1 (0.03N NH<sub>4</sub>F + 0.025 N HCl), Morgan’s reagent (sodium acetate-acetic acid, pH 4.8), deionized water, etc. were reported for the extraction of S from soil. The total content of micronutrients in soil was leached out with acids i.e. aqua-regia, HClO<sub>4</sub>, HF, HClO<sub>4</sub> + HNO<sub>3</sub>, H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> + HCl + HNO<sub>3</sub>, etc. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61746-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>The micronutrient status in surface soils of some parts of India was reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61746-ref7">7</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61746-ref23">23</xref>] . However, the information on the levels of micronutrient i.e. Co, Ni and Mo in the soil is lacking. In this work, the status of eight micronutrients i.e. Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn, Co, Ni, Mo, and S in surface soils of 100 villages of Raipur district is described. The concentration variations, deficiencies and toxicities of the micronutrients in the soil are discussed.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Study Area</title><p>The most of urbanization and industrialization in central India has been marked nearby capital city, Raipur, Chhattisgarh state, India. Raipur area includes Raipur district (22˚33'N - 21˚14'N and 82˚6' - 81˚38'E) and surrounding districts i.e. Balodabazar and Gariabandh. They are situated in the fertile plains of Chhattisgarh region of the country. Hundred city, town and villages of Raipur area (&#187;2.0 &#215; 10<sup>4</sup> km<sup>2</sup>) were selected for determining the micronutrient status of the soil.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Sample Collection</title><p>Generally, three different types of soil i.e. red laterite, gray, yellow soils occurred in this region. Three different types of soil from 100 villages of Raipur block were collected, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. Soils were taken from horizon of 0 - 15 cm depth. A total 300 soil samples were collected in February 2013 as described in the literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61746-ref24">24</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Analysis of pH and Extraction</title><p>The soils were dried, ground and sieved through a 2-mm sieve. All samples were stored in a 500-mL wide mouth polythene bottles for the analysis. A 10.0 g weighed amount of soil was taken in a 100-mL polythene conical flask by mixing with 20 mL deionized water. The mixture was shaken for 6 hrs, and their pH and electrical conductivity (EC) values were measured with the Hanna sensor-HI 991300N.</p><p>A mixed solution of reagents (E. Merck) i.e. AAAA-EDTA for the extraction of nutrient i.e. Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn and PO<sub>4</sub><sup>3−</sup>was used by dissolving 38.5 g ammonium acetate, 9.5 g Na<sub>2</sub>EDTA and 29 mL acetic acid (17 M) into 1 L deionized water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61746-ref25">25</xref>] . A 10 g dried and ground soil sample was taken into a 250-mL polyethylene flask with subsequent addition of 100 mL AAAA-EDTA solution. The mixture was equilibrated for 1 hr with a shaker, and solution was filtered through a 0.45 &#181;m glass fiber filter in a 100-mLpolyethylene volumetric flask.</p><p>For Mo, a 10 g soil sample was taken into 250-mL conical polyethylene flask by mixing with 100 mL deionized water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61746-ref26">26</xref>] . It was heated at boiling temperature for 10 min by subsequent filtering the cold solution as above. The activated charcoal and hot water were employed for the extraction of the available content of sulfate. A 10 g soil sample was mixed with 1 g activated charcoal and 100 mL deionized water into a 250-mL conical</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Representation of sampling locations in Chhattisgarh state of the country</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2602385x8.png"/></fig><p>polyethylene flask. The mixture was shaken for a duration of 1 hr by a shaker and solution was filtered through a 0.45 &#181;m glass fiber as above.</p><p>The mixed acid (H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> + HCl + HNO<sub>3</sub>) was used for extraction of the total content of micronutrients i.e. Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu and Zn. A 1.0 g dried and powdered soil sample was taken in a 100-mL Teflon beaker. Into it, 30.0 ml of mixed acid solution (H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> + HCl + HNO<sub>3</sub>) was added. The mixture was heated until white fumes were no longer emitted. The residue was washed with hot dilute hydrochloric acid (0.01 N) and the hot water (50˚C). The mixture was filtered through a 0.45 &#181;m glass fiber as above.</p><p>For leaching of total content of sulfate, a 1 g soil sample was mixed with 50 mL solution of acids: (HNO<sub>3</sub> + HClO<sub>4</sub>) into a 100-mL Teflon beaker by keeping overnight (12 hr). The solution was concentrated to 20 mL by gentle heating, and the cold solution was filtered through a glass fiber as above. The filtrate was evaporated to the dryness by subsequent dissolving with deionized water in a 50-mL polyethylene flask.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Analysis of Micronutrients</title><p>The Flame GBC 932AAwas used for analysis of metals i.e. Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn and Mo in the soil. The Dionex ion chromatography-1100―was employed for analysis of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2602385x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2602385x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Soil Characteristics</title><p>The agricultural land includes &#187; 50% area of the total land of the studied area. Three types of soils i.e. gray, yellow and red are available in the studied area. The red and yellow soil was originated by weathering of various rocks i.e. quartz, feldspars, mica and iron coated quartz formed over different geological periods. The yellow color was ascribed to the higher degree of hydration of the ferric oxide in these soils. The color shaded was also varied from reddish yellow to yellowish brown with often fine textured. The pH and EC of soil was ranged from 4.7 -7.7 and 100 - 900 &#181;S/cm.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Iron</title><p>The levels of available micronutrients in the soils of Raipur area is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Iron comprises about 5% of the earth’s crust and is the fourth most abundant element in the lithosphere [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61746-ref27">27</xref>] . The most of the soil iron was found in primary mineral, clays, oxides and hydroxides. The available and total content of Fe in soils of the studied area were varied widely and ranged from 30 - 8253 and 11676 - 40,928 mg/kg with mean value of 642 &#177; 186 and 19930 &#177; 5979 mg/kg, respectively. Considering 6 mg/kg as the critical value of Fe, the soils of studied area was found to be contaminated with a very high level of Fe.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Copper</title><p>The concentration of Cu in the earth’s crust is averaged 28 mg/kg [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61746-ref27">27</xref>] . The available and total status of Cu in soils of the studied area was ranged from 2.0 - 8.0 and 45 - 69 mg/kg with mean value of 4.3 &#177; 0.3 and 53 &#177; 16 mg/kg, respectively. A 0.2 and 50 mg/kg Cu were reported as critical and threshold value for Cu-deficiency and Cu-toxicity to plant growth. Almost all soil of this region was found to be contaminated with sufficient amount of Cu for the healthy growth of plants.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Zinc</title><p>The Zinc content of the lithosphere is 67 mg/kg [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61746-ref27">27</xref>] . Zinc has a strong tendency to combine with sulfide ores, and it occurs most frequently in the lithosphere as sphalerite. The available and total status of Zn in soils of this region was ranged from 0.7 - 5.0 and 27 - 56 mg/kg with mean value of 2.3 &#177; 0.2 and 38 &#177; 14 mg/kg, respectively. Critical limit for Zn-deficiency in different type of soils for different crops were ranged from 0.4 to 0.8 mg/kg. A few soils of studied area was found to be deficient in available Zn for the plant growth if the value 0.80 mg/kg was considered as a critical limit. A value of 50 mg/kg Zn was reported as threshold value for the plant toxicity. None of soil of the studied is contaminated Zn at the toxic level.</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Manganese</title><p>Manganese concentration in the earth’s crust is 1000 mg/kg [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61746-ref27">27</xref>] . The available and total level of Mn in soils of this region lie in the range of 205 - 2800 and 2737 -10,122 mg/kg with mean value 1178 &#177; 119 and 6889 &#177; 2274 mg/kg, respectively. A 5.7 and 55 mg/kg were reported as the critical limit for Mn-deficiency and threshold value of Mn-toxicity for plant growth, respectively.</p></sec><sec id="s3_6"><title>3.6. Cobalt</title><p>The average total cobalt concentration in the earth’s crust is 40 mg/kg [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61746-ref27">27</xref>] . The available and total concentration of cobalt in soils of this region were varied from 2.2 - 31.2 and 64 - 139 mg/kg with mean value 12.8 &#177; 1.3 and 119 &#177; 30 mg/kg, respectively. Considering the 2.5 mg/kg as the critical limit for Co deficiency in soil, almost all soils of this region may be rated as contaminated with sufficient level of Co for plant growth.</p></sec><sec id="s3_7"><title>3.7. Nickel</title><p>The natural abundance of nickel in the earth’ crust is 47 mg/kg [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61746-ref27">27</xref>] . The available and total level of Ni in soils of this region were varied from 0.1 - 13.4 and 15 - 70 mg/kg with mean value of 3.9 &#177; 0.6 and 35 &#177; 11 mg/kg, respectively. A 0.1 and 50 mg/kg Ni in soil were considered as the critical limit, and threshold value of toxicity for plant growth, respectively. All type of soils were found to be contaminated with a sufficient level of Ni for plant growth.</p></sec><sec id="s3_8"><title>3.8. Molybdenum</title><p>Molybdenum occurs in the soils in extremely small quantities, is usually found in concentrations of less than 1 mg/kg [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61746-ref27">27</xref>] . The available, and total Mo content in soils of the studied area varied from 0.1 - 8.9 and 3.4 - 9.2 mg/kg with mean 1.5 &#177; 0.3 and 4.6 &#177; 2.6 mg/kg, respectively. A 0.1 mg/kg was considered as the critical limit for Mo deficiency in soil. A 20.0 mg/kg Mo in soil was considered as threshold value for toxicity. None of the soil in this region was found to contain Mo at the toxic level.</p>
<table-wrap-group id="1"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Mean (n = 3) micronutrient status of soil, mg/kg</title></caption>
<table-wrap id="1_1"></table-wrap></table-wrap-group></sec>
<sec id="s3_9"><title>3.9. Sulphur</title>
<p>The earth’s crust contain about 0.06% Sulphur [27] . It is mostly present as sulfides, sulfates and organic combinations with C and N. The available and total   in this region was lie in the range of 41 - 747 and 294 - 1782 mg/kg with mean value of 281 ± 25 and 631 ± 180 mg/kg, respectively. The critical limit of   in the soil was reported to be 10 mg/kg. No soils of the studied area were found to be deficient in sulfur level.</p></sec>
<sec id="s3_10"><title>3.10. Concentration Variations and Statistics</title>
<p>The range, mean, median, kurtosis and skewness values of micronutrient concentration in soils of 100 villages of the studied area are presented in Table 2. The highest value of Fe or, Cu, Zn, Mn, Co, Ni and Mo was observed in site i.e. Khamtarai, Arang, Murabangoli, Mandir Hasaud, Tilda, Abanpur and Dharsiva, respectively, Figure 2. The content of six micronutrients i.e., Cu, Zn, Co, Ni and Mo are symmetrically distributed in all locations, Figure 3. However, large variations in the content of two micronutrients i.e. Fe and Mn was seen, may be due to input by the industrial effluents, Figure 3. The data for seven micronutrients i.e. Cu, Zn, Mn, Co, Ni, Mo and   were found to be distributed normally and symmetrically with comparable median and mean values. A large variation in the case of Fe was noticed, may be due to asymmetric distribution of iron minerals in the soil. The available content of the micronutrients in soils of the studied area was found in the following decreasing order: Mn > Fe > SO42−> Co > Cu > Ni > Zn > Mo, Figure 4. Among them, manganese was found to be at the highest level followed by Fe. However in the case of total levels, a different trend (Fe > Mn > SO42−> Co > Cu > Zn > Ni > Mo) was observed, Figure 4. A large fraction of S was found to be available for the plant growth, Figure 5. However, low to moderate fractions of other micronutrients were available, Figure 5. All of them showed a positive correlation between the available and total metal content with the highest and lowest values for Ni and Cu, respectively, Figure 6.</p>
<p>The available content of all micronutrients except Zn and   was found to decrease as the soil profile was increased from 0 to 120 cm, may be due to strong adsorption of the cations by the geomedia, Figure 7. The total content of all micronutrients except   was found to increase as the soil depth profile was increased from 0 to 120 cm due to their poor adsorption by the geo-media, Figure 8.</p></sec>
<sec id="s3_11"><title>3.11. Micronutrient Deficiency and Toxicity</title>
<p>The micronutrients i.e. Fe, Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Mo and S are used in very small amounts. The presence of micronutrients below critical limit often causes adverse effects in plant growth and in their yields. For each micronutrient, the critical levels, limit of deficiency, toxicity and optimal growth vary with the genotype and are profoundly affected by plant metabolism and by edaphic and environmental factor that affect the absorption of nutrients. In the studied area, five micronutrients i.e. Co, Ni, Cu, Mo and S are found in soils at the sufficient levels. Two micronutrients i.e. Fe and Mn are present at toxic levels in all types of soils of this region. In some area, the Zn deficiency in the soils is observed. The iron chlorosis was commonly seen in the plants of this region which may be due to very high amount of Fe content in soil. The brown or purplish spots on leaves, on lower part of the stem and leaf margins are commonly marked in this region that may be due to manganese toxicity.The most visible zinc deficiency symptoms i.e. short internodes and a decrease in leaf size were observed in the plants of this region.</p></sec>
<sec id="s3_12"><title>3.12. Comparison of Micronutrient Status</title>
<p>The concentration of available maximum amount of Fe, Mn, Zn,  and Cu reported was 12234, 269, 121, 70, and 30 mg/kg, respectively [8] [11] [21] . The levels of micronutrients i.e. Fe, Mn, and S were found to be at the highest levels in this region. The content of Cu was present at moderated levels similar to other part of country [7] . The Zn content was present low levels as occurred in other parts of the Country [7] . The level of Mo was present at moderate levels but high content of Fe, Mn, and S may cause Mo deficiency.</p></sec></sec>
<sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title>
<p>All types of soils in Raipur area are found to be associated with high levels of Fe, Mn, S; moderate levels of Cu and low level of Mo and Zn. The relative abundance of free form of micronutrients (available content/total content) in soils of this region is found in following decreasing order: S >> Mn > Mo > Cu >> Zn ≈ Fe. The adverse effects i.e. chlorosis of young leaves, premature fall of fruits, narcotics, stunned growth of plants/crops in plants of this region are frequently seen may be due to either Fe and Mn toxicities or Zn deficiency or their combination. The Zn deficiency could be corrected by application of Zn compounds e.g. Zinc sulfate, Zinc oxide, Zinc phosphate, etc. in the soil.</p>
</sec></body>
<back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.61746-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gupta, U.C., Kening, W. and Siyuan, L. (2008) Micronutrients in Soils, Crops and Livestock. Earth Science Frontiers, 15, 110-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1872-5791(09)60003-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61746-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Renwick, A.G. and Walker, R. (2008) Risk Assessment of Micronutrients. Toxicology Letters, 180, 123-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.05.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61746-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fageria, N.K., Baligar, V.C. and Clark, R.B. (2002) Micronutrients in Crop Production. Advances in Agronomy, 77, 185-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(02)77015-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61746-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Welch, R.M. and Shuman, L. (1995) Micronutrient Nutrition of Plants. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 14, 49-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07352689509701922</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61746-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mortvedt, J.J., Cox, F.R., Shuman, L.M. and Welch, R.M. (1991) Micronutrients in Agriculture Second Edition Number 4 in the Soil Science Society of America Book Series Chapter 14. Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61746-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chatzistathis, T. (2014) Micronutrient Deficiency in Soils &amp; Plants, Micronutrient Solubility and Availability in Soils. Bentham Science Publishers Ltd., Oak Park.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61746-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gupta, A.P. (2005) Micronutrient Status and Fertilizer Use Scenario in India. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, 18, 325-331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2005.04.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61746-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gowda, N.K.S., Ramana, J.V., Prasad, C.S. and Singh, K. (2004) Micronutrient Content of Certain Tropical Conventional and Unconventional Feed Resources of Southern India. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 36, 77-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:TROP.0000009522.30949.1d</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61746-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yadav</surname><given-names> B.K. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2011</year>)<article-title>Micronutrient Status of Soils under Legume Crops in Arid Region of Western Rajasthan, India</article-title><source> Academic Journal of Plant Sciences</source><volume> 4</volume>,<fpage> 94</fpage>-<lpage>97</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61746-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sharma, J.C. and Chaudhary, S.K. (2007) Vertical Distribution of Micronutrient Cations in Relation to Soil Characteristics in Lower Shiwalika of Solan District in North-West Himalayas. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, 55, 40-44.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61746-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Venkastesh, M.S., Majumdar, B.K. and Patriam, K. (2003) Status of Micronutrient Cations under Various Land Use Systems of Meghalaya. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, 51, 60-64.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61746-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sharma, R.P., Singh, M. and Sharma, J.P. (2003) Correlation Studies on Micronutrients Vis-a-Vis Soil Properties in Some Soils of Nagaur Districts in Semi-Arid Region of Rajasthan. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, 51, 522-527.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61746-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Somasundaram, J., Singh, R.K., Parandiyal, A.K. and Prasad, S.N. (2009) Micronutrient Status of Soils under Different Land Use Systems in Chambal Ravines. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, 57, 307-312.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61746-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yadav, R.L. and Meena, M.C. (2009) Available Micronutrient Status and Their Relationship with Soil Properties of Degana Soil Series of Rajasthan. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, 57, 90-92.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61746-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hundal, H.S., Raj, K., Singh, D. and Machandra, J.S. (2006) Available Nutrient and Heavy Metal Status of Soils of Punjab, North-West India. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, 54, 50-56.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61746-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anil, S., Sharma, P.K., Tur, N.S. and Nayyar, V.K. (2009) Micronutrient Status and Their Spatial Variability in Soils of Muktsar District of Punjab—A GIS Approach. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, 57, 300-306.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61746-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kumar, M. and Babel, A.L. (2011) Available Micronutrient Status and Their Relationship with Soil Properties of Jhunjhunu Tehsil, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan, India. Journal of Agricultural Science, 3, 97-106. http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/11011http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jas.v3n2p97</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61746-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Prasad, B. and Sinha, N.P. (1982) Changes in the Status of Micronutrients in Soil with Long Term Applications of Chemical Fertilizers, Lime and Manure. Plant and Soil, 64, 437-441. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02372526</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61746-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arunachalam, P., Kannan, P., Prabukumar, G. and Govindaraj, M. (2013) Zinc Deficiency in Indian Soils with Special Focus to Enrich Zinc in Peanut. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8, 6681-6688. http://eprints.icrisat.ac.in/id/eprint/12416</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61746-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Patra, P., Mondal, S. and Ghosh, G.K. (2012) Status of Available Sulphur in Surface and Sub-Surface Soils of Red and Lateritic Soils of West Bengal. International Journal of Plant Animal and Environmental Sciences, 2, 276-281.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61746-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Singh</surname><given-names> A.H.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Kumarjit</surname><given-names> S.R.K.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Singh L.N.</surname><given-names> Gopimohan</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> S.N.</surname><given-names> Nandini</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> C. and Kumar</surname><given-names> S.A.K. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2007</year>)<article-title>Sulphur Status and forms in Acid Soils of Manipur</article-title><source> Indian Journal of Agricultural Research</source><volume> 41</volume>,<fpage> 205</fpage>-<lpage>209</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61746-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Velmurugana, R., Mahendranb, P.P., Wania, S.P., Uttama, K. and Prabhavathic, M. (2013) Molybdenum Status and Critical Limit in the Soil for Green Gram (Vigna radiata) Growing in Madurai and Sivagangai Districts of Tamil Nadu, India. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 59, 229-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2012.763021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61746-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dhamak, A.L., Meshram, N.A. and Waikar, S.L. (2014) Assessment of Micronutrient Indices in Soils of Ambajogai Tahsil of Beed District under Semiarid Agro Ecological Region (Maharashtra). Journal of Research in Agriculture and Animal Science, 2, 40-43. http://www.questjournals.org/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61746-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tan, K.H. (2005) Soil Sampling, Preparation and Analysis. 2nd Edition, CRC Press, Boca Raton. https://www.crcpress.com/Books-in-Soils-Plants-and-the-Environment/book-series/CRCBKSPE</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61746-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sippola, J. (1994) Acid Ammonium Acetate-EDTA Universal Extractant in Soil Testing and Environmental Monitoring. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 25, 1755-1761. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00103629409369149</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61746-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zbiral, J. (1992) Determination of Molybdenum in Hot-Water Soil Extracts: Influence of pH and Available Iron on the Molybdenum Content. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 23, 817-825. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00103629209368631</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61746-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Rudnick, R.L. and Gao, S. (2003) The Composition of the Continental Crust. In: Holland, H.D. and Turekian, K.K., Eds., Treatise on Geochemistry, Vol. 3, The Crust, Elsevier-Pergamon, Oxford, 1-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b0-08-043751-6/03016-4</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>