<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JEMAA</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Electromagnetic Analysis and Applications</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1942-0730</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jemaa.2015.712030</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JEMAA-61658</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Engineering</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  A New Approach Based on MoM-GEC Method to Mutual Coupling Analysis of Symmetric Twin Waveguides for Antenna Applications
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>bdessalem</surname><given-names>Kaddouri</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mourad</surname><given-names>Aidi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Taoufik</surname><given-names>Aguili</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Communication System Laboratory Sys’Com, National Engineering School of Tunis, University Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>kaddouri.abdessalam@sotetel.tn(BK)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>03</day><month>12</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>283</fpage><lpage>290</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>30</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>30</month>	<year>November</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>3</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In previous modeling works, the waveguide radiation in the free space is modeled using an infinite flange in aperture plan. In this paper, we propose a new formulation to analyze the radiation of twin rectangular waveguides in free space. Our formulation consists firstly in simulating the free space as rectangular waveguide and seeking the appropriate dimensions that do not affect scattering parameters. In the second step, we use the symmetry principle to reduce the coupling problem to single guide radiating in the free space. Moreover, for more simplification, we consider a concentric discontinuity to solve this latter. This approach is based on moments method combined to the generalized equivalent circuit method (MoM-GEC) in order to reduce the number of unknown problems and alleviate their computation. Obtained numerical results are presented and discussed. A good agreement with literature is shown and the boundary conditions are verified.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Waveguide</kwd><kwd> Coupling</kwd><kwd> MoM-GEC</kwd><kwd> Propagation</kwd><kwd> Scattering</kwd><kwd> Electric Field</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Open-ended rectangular waveguide is the elementary component for the millimeter wave’s propagation. Several kinds of design have been proposed (single, coupled, networked...) to be used to achieve several applications such as satellite communication, radar, medical systems, and geophysical applications [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61658-ref1">1</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61658-ref3">3</xref>]. The variational method is the first approach used to solve the electromagnetic problem concerning these areas [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61658-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61658-ref5">5</xref>]. The boundary conditions require a relationship between the tangential electromagnetic fields, which leads to an integral equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61658-ref6">6</xref>]. This integral equation is solved using the moment method to investigate the single or coupled waveguides behaviors.</p><p>In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61658-ref7">7</xref>], the aperture field is modeled using the LSE modes and is based on point-matching approach. This formulation is extended in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61658-ref8">8</xref>] by including the cross-polarized component and a dominant mode approximation is employed. Another approach consists in formulating the waveguide coupling with an iris [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61658-ref9">9</xref>] by employing orthogonal functions associated to the LSE modes. In fact, a general asymptotic formula to study the coupling between modes in separate waveguides has been applied to investigate the response of a uniform [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61658-ref10">10</xref>], and non- uniform rectangular waveguide array [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61658-ref11">11</xref>].</p><p>Some other authors have used the generalized network formulation, which is based essentially on the equivalence principle and MoM method. This formulation was applied to finite phased arrays [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61658-ref12">12</xref>] and reactively loaded waveguide arrays [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61658-ref13">13</xref>].</p><p>There are many other methods which have been applied to solve the flanged waveguide problem. The correlation matrix method which is based on the energy conservation low has been applied in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61658-ref14">14</xref>], while Teodoridis et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61658-ref15">15</xref>] have used the characteristic modes and the problem is solved by investigating the eigenvalues. In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61658-ref16">16</xref>], Boudrant et al. have obtained an integral equation by using the operator transverse method. This integral equation was solved using the Galerkin’s method.</p><p>In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61658-ref17">17</xref>], a rigorous formulation based on integral equation is proposed and solved by MoM method in order to analyse the radiation of rectangular waveguides array. Another approach consists to consider this last as a flanged parallel-plate waveguides array [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61658-ref18">18</xref>]. Serizawa et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61658-ref19">19</xref>] used an analytical method based on Kobayashi potential method (KP) and derived the exact expressions of the fields to obtain reference data of physical quantities.</p><p>Mongiado et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61658-ref20">20</xref>] proposed a singular integral equation approach including the edge condition on the apertures from the start, in order to analyze single and twin radiating waveguide</p><p>In this paper, a new rigorous approach is proposed to model two opened waveguides radiating in free space. The concept consists, firstly, in using the symmetry principle to reduce structure to half, and simulate properly the free space by another rectangular waveguide. Secondly, it consists in studying electromagnetic coupling between these waveguides. For validity purpose, obtained results are compared to those in previous works, and good agreement is shown.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. MoM-GEC Formalism</title><p>Basically, in electromagnetic study, problems are well described by Maxwell’s equations. But in order to alleviate their complexity, we always need to choose the appropriate method that can approximate environment and boundary conditions to compute it within a reasonable time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61658-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61658-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61658-ref22">22</xref>] . In our case, we combine two methods. The first method is the generalized equivalent circuits (GEC) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61658-ref22">22</xref>] . It can present integral equations by equivalent circuit that describes faithfully all the problem. Electromagnetic phenomenon in discontinuity, which is the unknown problem, is presented by a virtual source. The environments are brought back to discontinuity plan as admittance or impedance operator. Excitation is illustrated as a localized or a modal source, in discontinuity too [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61658-ref23">23</xref>] . The second is the method of moment (MoM) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61658-ref21">21</xref>] . It associates the known test functions to a virtual source, injects a modal basis in environment operator, and projects test function on a modal basis to resolve the problem. The good choices of test function lead to accelerate the convergence, and reduce greatly the computation time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61658-ref24">24</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Formulation</title><p>In this paper, we propose a modular formulation, in other terms, we simplify the problem step by step.</p><p>As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, the study structure is composed by two opened rectangular waveguides, called network guides (NG), radiate in free space. This latter is considered as a third waveguide, called space guide (SG); with large dimensions.</p><p>In the second time, we use the symmetry principle to reduce the number of NGs to one. Then, odd and even input impedance are determined respectively when we apply structures presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b). Thus, the input impedance of initial structure is easily deduced as it will be shown later.</p><p>Finally, we propose to study the SG influence, and we will make sure that considered dimensions do not affect the results.</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Studied structure</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x6.png"/></fig><fig-group id="fig2"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Symmetry principle.</title></caption><fig id ="fig2_1"><label> (b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x7.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>So, now the problem is reduced to study NG1 radiates in SG. For this, we present the new considered structure in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a); and its relative equivalent circuit model in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b).</p><p>The excitation is brought back to discontinuity plan as a modal source of current, its value is the current density of the fundamental mode, and its internal admittance is<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. This latter represents the evanescent modes contribution of NG1; and its formal writing is:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61658-formula28"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x9.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the NG1 modal basis without the fundamental<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the mode admittance of each<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The voltage at terminals of this source is<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, who is its dual greatness.</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the virtual voltage source defined in discontinuity plan, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the current flowing it. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the problem unknown, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is expressed as a serial of test functions <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> weighted by unknown modal amplitudes<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61658-formula29"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x21.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The modes contribution of SG is expressed in the discontinuity plane by admittance operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> .</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61658-formula30"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x23.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the SG modal basis and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the relative mode admittance.</p><p>Based on the equivalent circuit shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b), the integral equations associated with the problem can be easily derived by applying Kirchhoff laws generalized:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61658-formula31"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x26.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using the equations system (4), we can write:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61658-formula32"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x27.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Then, we can deduce the current<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61658-formula33"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x29.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Taking into account the expression<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we can find the relation between source variables and their duals:</p><fig-group id="fig3"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Simplified structure and the relative equivalent circuit.</title></caption><fig id ="fig3_1"><label> (b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x31.png"/></fig></fig-group><disp-formula id="scirp.61658-formula34"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x32.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Applying the Galerkin’s method:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61658-formula35"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x33.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This equations system can be rewritten as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61658-formula36"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x34.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where A is the excitation vector, and [y] is the admittance matrix:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61658-formula37"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x35.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61658-formula38"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x36.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By separating the admittance operators, we can rewrite [y] matrix as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61658-formula39"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x37.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the first term presents the projection of test functions on the evanescent modes of the same guide, and the second term their projection on the load operator.</p><p>Finally, we deduce the unknown problem:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61658-formula40"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x38.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Taking into account relations (8) and (12), we deduce the input impedance z:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61658-formula41"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x39.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>And scattering matrix is given by:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61658-formula42"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x40.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is impedance of free space.</p><p>To pass to total structure, we must replace<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, in Equation (13), by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> depending on boundary conditions described in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p><p>So, the total input impedance matrix <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is given by:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61658-formula43"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x46.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We note that z is the reduced matrix, and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the identity matrix.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61658-formula44"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x48.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The total scattering matrix <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is expressed as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61658-formula45"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x50.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here, the formulation gives us <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> parameters between NG1 and NG2; and SG has no more influence.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Numerical Results</title><p>In this section, we propose first a quantitative discussion about the radiation of a real opened waveguide (WR90) in the free space, in order to determine the appropriate model that simulates the free space. Second, we study the electromagnetic coupling between NG1 and NG2.</p><p>To set certain parameters of the problem, a convergence study is strongly recurred. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> presents the S11 norm as a function of a mode number for different test function number.</p><p>As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>, the convergence is obtained for 15 test functions and 1600 mode functions. To ensure the convergence, in the following, we always use these last values.</p><p>First main target of this study is to determine the appropriate SG dimensions to simulate the free space. For this, we present in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> the S parameters as function of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Where D and d<sub>1</sub> are respectively dimensions of SG and NG1.</p><p>We can consider that from D = 7d<sub>1</sub> − 4.6λ there is no influence of SG on results. For a validation propose, we present in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, the obtained reflection coefficient S11 and that obtained in previous works for operating frequency f = 9.33 GHz. It is found that a good agreement is shown.</p><p>The second main target of this study is to determine coupling effects between two NGs. For this we explore<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> parameter, and validate it with previous work [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61658-ref7">7</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>). We notice that a good agreement is shown around the operating frequency f = 9.33 GHz.</p><p>We present in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>, the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> parameter as function of the coupling distance d. And we can notice that for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the coupling coefficient reaches a value of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. This coupling value corresponds to 2% of the total energy. So, from this distance, we can consider the two waveguides as isolated.</p><p>At<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the scattering matrix <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> worth:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61658-formula46"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x59.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> |S<sub>11</sub>| based on mode number and at several test functions number ratio for operating frequency f = 9.33 GHz and for NG1 is a WR90 waveguide</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x60.png"/></fig><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> S parameters based on dimensions ratio for operating frequency f = 9.33 GHz and for NG1 is a WR90 waveguide</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x61.png"/></fig><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>as function of frequency for r = 10, coupling distance d = 25.4 mm, and NGs are WR90 waveguides</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x62.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of reflection coefficient with published results</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Method</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Re (S11)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Im (S11)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >|S11|</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >E<sub>r</sub></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Present method</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0768</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.2662</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2771</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Serizawa, Hongo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61658-ref19">19</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0713</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.2344</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2450</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bird [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61658-ref10">10</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0706</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.2352</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2456</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Macphie [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61658-ref14">14</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0632</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.2403</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2484</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Baudrand [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61658-ref16">16</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0655</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.2709</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2787</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5%</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mongiardo [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61658-ref20">20</xref>]</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0803</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.2365</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2498</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>We can notice that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> does not contain the entire energy.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61658-formula47"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x65.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>parameter as function of distance d, f = 9.33 GHz, r = 10, and NGs are WR90 waveguides</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x66.png"/></fig><fig id="fig8"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref></label><caption><title> Normalized electric field in discontinuity plan, r = 10, d = 2λ, f = 9.33 GHz</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x68.png"/></fig><p>If one considers the load operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which is in fact the free space, we can explain the difference by the radiating energy in the free space. This radiation is given by:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61658-formula48"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x70.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Moreover, we present the normalized electric field in the discontinuity plan, with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, r = 10, and we can verify that it is maximum in the radiating apertures and vanishes on the metal surface. This shows (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>) that the electric field verifies the boundary conditions.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>In this study, we apply a rigorous formulation based on MoM-GEC method to explore a radiation of twin open ended waveguides in the free space. The main idea is composed by two steps. First, we consider two waveguides with a simple concentric discontinuity in the propagation axis. One represents the radiating waveguide, and the other is the load waveguide; and we seek how this latter can properly simulate the free space. So, we determine its appropriate dimensions so that it no longer affects the scattering parameters. Second, we studied the electro- magnetic coupling between these two open ended waveguides and we present the electric field in the discontinuity plan. For a validation purpose, obtained results are compared to previous published works and boundary conditions are verified and a good agreement is shown. From the numerical results discussion, we can deduce that the load waveguide emulates the free space and no mismatch problem is shown from r = 7 and that the electromagnetic coupling for twin waveguides can be considered neglected from a coupling distance<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-9801656x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>AbdessalemKaddouri,MouradAidi,TaoufikAguili, (2015) A New Approach Based on MoM-GEC Method to Mutual Coupling Analysis of Symmetric Twin Waveguides for Antenna Applications. Journal of Electromagnetic Analysis and Applications,07,283-290. doi: 10.4236/jemaa.2015.712030</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.61658-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hirokawa, J. (2012) Plate-Laminated Waveguide Slot Array Antennas and Its Polarization Conversion Layers. Automatika—Journal for Control, Measurement, Electronics, Computing and Communications, 53.http://dx.doi.org/10.7305/automatika.53-1.143</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61658-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Douvalis, V., Hao, Y. and Parini, C.G. (2006) A Monolithic Active Conical Horn Antenna Array for Millimeter and Submillimeter Wave Applications. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 54, 1393-1398.http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2006.874338</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61658-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lo, Y.T. and Lee, S.W. (2013) Antenna Handbook: Theory, Applications, and Design. Springer Science &amp; Business Media, Berlin.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61658-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lewin, L. (1951) Advanced Theory of Waveguides. Published for Wireless Engineer by Iliffe.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61658-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mazauric, V. (2011) Une approche variationnelle de lkélectromagnétisme.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61658-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tai, C.T. (1949) Application of a Variational Principle to Biconical Antennas. Journal of Applied Physics, 20, 1076.http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1698278</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61658-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mailloux, R.J. (1969) Radiation and Near-Field Coupling between Two Collinear Open-Ended Waveguides. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 17, 49-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TAP.1969.1139354</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61658-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mailloux, R.J. (1969) First-Order Solutions for Mutual Coupling between Waveguides Which Propagate Two Orthogonal Modes. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 17, 740-746. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TAP.1969.1139529</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61658-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hockham, G.A. and Walker, G.H. (1973) Study of a Finite Phased Array Antenna. 3rd European Microwave Conference, 1-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/euma.1973.331796</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61658-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bird, T.S. (1979) Mode Coupling in a Planar Circular Waveguide Array. IEE Journal on Microwaves, Optics and Acoustics, 3, 172-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/ij-moa.1979.0041</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61658-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bird, T.S. (1990) Analysis of Mutual Coupling in Finite Arrays of Different-Sized Rectangular Waveguides. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 38, 166-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/8.45118</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61658-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Luzwick, J. and Harrington, R.F. (1982) Mutual Coupling Analysis in a Finite Planar Rectangular Waveguide Antenna Array. Electromagnetics, 2, 25-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02726348208915155</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61658-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arndt, F., Wolff, K.-H., Brunjes, L., et al. (1989) Generalized Moment Method Analysis of Planar Reactively Loaded Rectangular Waveguide Arrays. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 37, 329-338.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61658-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Macphie, R.H., Zaghloul, A., et al. (1980) Radiation from a Rectangular Waveguide with Infinite Flange—Exact Solution by the Correlation Matrix Method. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 28, 497-503.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61658-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Teodoridis, V., Sphicopoulos, T. and Gardiol, F.E. (1985) The Reflection from an Open-Ended Rectangular Waveguide Terminated by a Layered Dielectric Medium. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 33, 359-366.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61658-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baudrand, H., Tao, J.-W. and Atechian, J. (1988) Study of Radiating Properties of Open-Ended Rectangular Waveguides. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 36, 1071-1077. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/8.7219</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61658-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, J.-Y., Li, L.-W., Liang, C.-H., et al. (2001) Analysis of Finite-Slot Phased Arrays Fed by Rectangular Waveguides Using Method of Moments. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, 29, 132-136.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mop.1107</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61658-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ghosh, B., Sinha, S.N. and Kartikeyan, M.V. (2010) Radiation from Rectangular Waveguide-Fed Fractal Apertures. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 58, 2088-2093. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2010.2046835</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61658-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Serizawa, H. and Hongo, K. (2005) Radiation from a Flanged Rectangular Waveguide. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 53, 3953-3962. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2005.859748</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61658-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mongiardo, M. and Rozzi, T. (1993) Singular Integral Equation Analysis of Flange-Mounted Rectangular Waveguide Radiators. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 41, 556-565. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/8.222274</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61658-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baudrand, H. and Bajon, D. (2002) Equivalent Circuit Representation for Integral Formulations of Electromagnetic Problems. International Journal of Numerical Modelling: Electronic Networks, Devices and Fields, 15, 23-57.http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jnm.430</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61658-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aguili, T. (2000) Modélisation des composants SH F planaires par la méthode des circuits équivalents généralisés. Thesis Manuscript, National Engineering School of Tunis, Tunisia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61658-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baudrand, H. and Aubert, H. (2003) L’Electromagnétisme par les Schémas Equivalents. Cepaduès Editions, Paris.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61658-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hajji, M., Mendil, S. and Aguili, T. (2014) A New Hybrid MoM-GEC Asymptotic Method for Electromagnetic Scattering Computation in Waveguides. Progress in Electromagnetics Research B, 61, 197-210.http://dx.doi.org/10.2528/PIERB14101303</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>