<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2015.614213</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-61306</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  The Masses of P&lt;sub&gt;c&lt;/sub&gt;* (4380) and P&lt;sub&gt;c&lt;/sub&gt;* (4450) as Di-Hadronic States
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ismita</surname><given-names>Ghosh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Aparajita</surname><given-names>Bhattacharya</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ballari</surname><given-names>Chalrabarti</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Physics, Jogamaya Devi College, Kolkata, India</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Physics, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>rismita.ghosh@gmail.com(IG)</email>;<email>pampa@phys.jdvu.ac.in(AB)</email>;<email>ballari_chakrabarti@yahoo.co.in(BC)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>05</day><month>11</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>14</issue><fpage>2070</fpage><lpage>2073</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>7</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>17</month>	<year>November</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>20</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p><html>
 <head></head>
 
  The masses of the recently reported by LHCb two pentaquark charmonium states P
  <sub>c</sub>* (4380) and P
  <sub>c</sub>* (4450) which are suggested to possess pentaquark configuration (
  <img alt="" src="Edit_5494cfc7-f480-4987-8458-a16fc2c42edb.jpg" />) have been estimated considering a dihadronic state consisting of a meson 
  <img alt="" src="Edit_7dfb5391-1bf6-49e7-87a3-241fadc442d4.bmp" /> and a baryon (uud). The binding energies of the states have been estimated with a van der Walls type of molecular interaction between the hadrons. A spin interaction has also been considered. Masses of these two states are well reproduced with the aforesaid molecular interaction which indicates that the multiquarks P
  <sub>c</sub>* (4380) and P
  <sub>c</sub>* (4450) can be well described as meson-baryon bound states.
 
</html></p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Pentaquark</kwd><kwd> Di-Hadronic Molecule</kwd><kwd> Molecular Interaction</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The existence of pentaquark charmonium states with the decay of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> has been reported by LHCb [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref1">1</xref>] recently. The intermediate states have been identified as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (4380) and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (4450). The states are</p><p>identified as sum of two up quarks, one down quark, one charm quark and one anti-charm quark with spin <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> respectively. The identification of these pentaquark states is exciting and will give new impetus to the</p><p>study of the properties and dynamics of multiquark states [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref2">2</xref>] . The exotics remain less known and less understood compared to the properties of mesons <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and baryons (qqq) which are well studied both in theory and experiment. The properties and dynamics of exotic states like tetraquark, pentaquark, hexaquark states are yet to be studied and it is well understood that they cannot be described in the framework of conventional quark model. A number of models like the quark model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref4">4</xref>] , bag model [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref6">6</xref>] , and non-relativistic potential models [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref8">8</xref>] have been used to study the multiquark systems. The description of the multiquark states as di-hadronic states considering them as a bound state of a meson and a baryon is one of the useful candidates for studying the properties of such systems.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Method</title><p>In the present work pentaquark states <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (4380) and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (4450) are described as di-hadronic molecules consisting of a meson and a baryon assuming a van der Waals type of molecular interaction acting between the con-</p><p>stituent hadrons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref10">10</xref>] . <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>(4380) state of spin <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is assumed to have configuration as proton-charmonium state as (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) whereas <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (4450) state of spin <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> has been described as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> state. A spin interaction</p><p>has also been considered. Masses of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (4380) and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (4450) as di-hadronic molecule have been estimated using the mass formula.</p><p>Assuming the pentaquark states as meson-baryon system the mass formula for the low-lying di-hadronic molecule runs as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61306-formula284"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x29.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where M<sub>1</sub>, M<sub>2</sub> represent the masses of the constituent hadrons respectively, E<sub>BE</sub> represents the binding energy of the di-hadronic system and E<sub>SD</sub> represents the spin-dependent term.</p><p>The binding energy can be expressed as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61306-formula285"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x30.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where r is the radius parameter of the di-hadronic molecule and V(r) is the di-hadronic molecular potential which is expressed as [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref10">10</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61306-formula286"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x31.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where k<sub>mol</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref10">10</xref>] is the residual strength of the strong interaction molecular coupling and C is the effective colour screening of the confined gluons. It may be mentioned that the residual interaction of the confined gluon is considered similar to van der Waals interaction and is assumed to be due to asymptotic expression (r<sub>12</sub> → ∞) of the residual confined one-gluon exchange interaction with strength k<sub>mol</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>Ψ(r) is the wave function of the di-hadronic state. To estimate E<sub>BE</sub> we have used the wave functions for the ground state of the hadronic molecule from statistical model which runs as: [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref12">12</xref>]</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61306-formula287"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x32.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61306-formula288"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x33.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>corresponding to the linear type of background potential and harmonic type of background potential respectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref12">12</xref>] . r<sub>12</sub> is the radius of the hadronic molecule and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is usual step function. With r<sub>12</sub> = r<sub>1</sub> + r<sub>2</sub>, where r<sub>1</sub> and r<sub>2</sub> represent the individual radii of the hadrons constituting the molecule respectively and using Equations (2), (3) and (4) we get E<sub>BE</sub> as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61306-formula289"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x35.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61306-formula290"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x36.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, C = 50 MeV [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref13">13</xref>] and k<sub>mol</sub> = 0.59 and 0.65 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref14">14</xref>] corresponding to linear and harmonic type of background potentials respectively. The radius of the corresponding baryons have been estimated by adjusting the value of charge radii [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref16">16</xref>] against the form factor of corresponding baryon [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref18">18</xref>] . The radius of “p” and “Δ” are obtained as 7.59 GeV<sup>−1</sup> and 5.977 GeV<sup>−1</sup> respectively. The radius of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> has been used from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref19">19</xref>] as r(J/ψ) = 2.005 GeV<sup>−1</sup>.</p><p>The spin hyperfine interaction can be expressed as [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref20">20</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61306-formula291"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x39.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where M<sub>1</sub> and M<sub>2</sub> are the masses of the constituent hadrons in the di-hadronic molecule, α<sub>s</sub> is the strong interaction constant, S<sub>1</sub> and S<sub>2</sub> are the spins of the hadrons involved, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the di-hadronic wave function at the origin. With α<sub>s</sub> = 0.59 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref21">21</xref>] the E<sub>SD</sub> has been estimated subsequently using the relation (8). The masses of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (4380), <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>(4450) have been estimated using the Equation (1) with mass of the respective meson (M<sub>1</sub>) and baryon (M<sub>2</sub>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref22">22</xref>] and displayed at the <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Discussions</title><p>In the present work we have estimated masses of particles <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (4380) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (4450) <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>consider-</p><p>ing them as di-hadronic (meson-baryon) molecules. The masses have been obtained as 4171 MeV and 4492 MeV for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (4380) and 4168 MeV and 4191 MeV for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (4450) with the input of two wave functions from the statistical model. The results are found to be in good agreement with the experiment. We have observed that the mass of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (4450) state is well reproduced where as for the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (4380) has somewhat smaller (~200 MeV) value which may be attributed to the uncertainty in the radius parameter used. It is interesting to note here</p><p>that the pentaquarks <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>are well described in the di-hadronic molecules with a weak van der</p><p>Waals type of interaction between them. It is also pertinent to point out that the statistical model wave function is also very successful in describing the hadrons. The pentaquark state is one of the leading candidates for the study of the multiquark state. The description of pentaquark as diquark-diquark-antiquark state has been done by a number of authors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref4">4</xref>] . It may be mentioned that recently some predictions of diquark model for hidden charm pentaquarks <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (4450) and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (4380) have been proposed by Li et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref23">23</xref>] . They have found that in the SU(3) limit, for U-spin related decay modes the ratio of the decay rates of Cabibbo suppressed to Cabibbo</p><p>allowed decay channels is given by<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The present investigation shows that they are also described well in the framework of di-hadronic states.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Binding energies and masses of pentaquark charmonium states as meson-baryon states</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >With <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> from (4)<sup> </sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >With <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> from (5)<sup> </sup></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Particle</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >State</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >E<sub>BE</sub> + E<sub>SD</sub> (MeV)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M (MeV)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >E<sub>BE</sub> + E<sub>SD</sub> (MeV)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M (MeV)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M<sub>exp</sub> (MeV) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61306-ref1">1</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>(4380) (spin<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >136</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4171</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >133</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4168</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4380 &#177; 8 &#177; 29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>(4450) (spin<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/10-7502486x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >163</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4492</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >162</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4491</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4449.8 &#177; 1.7 &#177; 2.5</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s4"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>Authors are thankful to University Grants Commission, New Delhi, India for their financial supports.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Rismita Ghosh,Aparajita Bhattacharya,Ballari Chalrabarti, (2015) The Masses of P<sub>c</sub>* (4380) and P<sub>c</sub>* (4450) as Di-Hadronic States. Journal of Modern Physics,06,2070-2073. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2015.614213</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.61306-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aaij, R., et al. (LHCb Collaboration) (2015) Physical Review Letters, 115, Article ID: 072001(50).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61306-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gell-Mann, M. (1964) Physics Letters, 8, 214-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9163(64)92001-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61306-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jaffe, R.L., et al. (2003) Physical Review Letters, 91, Article ID: 232003(1-4).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61306-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Karlinar, M., et al. (2003) Physics Letters B, 575, 249-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2003.09.062</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61306-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jaffe, R.L. (1977) Physical Review D, 15, 281-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.15.281</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61306-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Strottman, D. (1979) Physical Review D, 20, 748-767. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.20.748</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61306-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barnes, T., et al. (1987) Physical Review Letters B, 183, 210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(87)90440-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61306-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Weinstein, J., et al. (1983) Physical Review D, 27, 588. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.27.588</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61306-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vinodkumar, P.C., et al. (1992) Pramana-Journal of Physics, 39, 47-70.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61306-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vinodkumar, P.C., et al.(2003) DAE-BRNS Symposium on Nuclear Physics, 46B, 334.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61306-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bhattacharya, A., et al. (1998) European Physical Journal C, 2, 671-673.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61306-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bhattacharya, A., et al. (2005) Nuclear Physics (Proceedings Supplements), B142, 13.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2005.01.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61306-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rai, A.K., et al. (2006) Indian Journal of Physics, 80, 387-392.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61306-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chakrabarti, B., et al. (2009) Physica Scripta, 79, Article ID: 025103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/79/02/025103</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61306-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mohr, P.J., et al. (2011) The 2010 CODATA Recommended Values of the Fundamental Physical Constants. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61306-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alexandrou, C., et al. (2007) PoSLAT2007, 149.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61306-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Banerjee, S.N., et al. (1987) International Journal of Modern Physics A, 2, 1829. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X87000958</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61306-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bhattacharya, A., et al. (1988) Canadian Journal of Physics, 66, 749-751. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/p88-123</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61306-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hong, C., et al. (2001) Chinese Physics Letters, 18, 1558. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/18/12/305</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61306-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rai, A.K., et al. (2007) Nuclear Physics A, 782, 406-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.10.023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61306-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lucha, W., et al. (1991) Physics Report, 200, 168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(91)90001-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61306-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Beringer, J., et al. (Particle Data Group) (2012) Physical Review D, 86, Article ID: 010001.http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.86.010001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61306-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, G.N., et al. (2015) arXiv:1507.08252v2 [hep-ph].</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>