Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a motor system disorder, which is the result of the loss of dopamine-producing brain cells. PD is characterized by four primary symptoms: tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia and postural instability. Among the other symptoms depression and emotional deficits as apathy or anhedonia have high prevalence. The UK Parkinson’s Disease Society Brain Bank (UKPDSBB) clinical diagnostic criteria are routinely used for the diagnosis. Several risk factors are identified: age (around age 60 or older), heredity, sex (men), exposure to toxins (herbicides, pesticides).

As underlined by Dyduch and Zaluska [1] some symptoms of depression and notably anhedonia, in Parkinson’s disease (PD), present firstly a common neurobiological pathway and secondly a clinically overlap. Anhedonia, the lowered ability to experience pleasure, is a frequent symptom in Parkinson’s disease (PD) with a prevalence ranging from 4.7% to 45.7% using the cut off of 3 on the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) [2] . Compared with controls, higher scores on anhedonia rating scales were reported in PD [3] . One of the main problems in the exploration of the role of anhedonia in PD is its specificity. High anhedonia levels can be explained firstly by socio-demographical variables (e.g. age, gender, educational level) and secondly by clinical variables such as depression or hospitalisation [2] . Thus, to explore the specificity on anhedonia in PD it is necessary to control for the potential effects of the socio-demographical variables as well as the depressive level or the status of patients (in or outpatients). Moreover, the choice of the control group is very important. The specificity of anhedonia in PD can be established only with the use of controls presenting a non-Parkinson motor neurological disease. If the control group included only healthy subjects then any potential significant differences found between the healthy group and PD group would be explained only by the fact that the patients were ill, independently of the type of disease. If the control group included only patients with motor symptoms secondary to a non-Parkinson neurological disease then any potential significant difference would be explained by the Parkinson disease.

Of the seven studies [4] -[10] that have compared anhedonia rating scales scores between PD and controls, only one study used a control group of non-Parkinson motor neurological disease [10] , the others having used healthy subjects group [5] -[9] or subjects with osteoarthritis [4] .

Recently, two distinctive types of pleasure deficits have been proposed [11] [12] . Anticipatory anhedonia refers to the inability to anticipate pleasure for a future reward or “wanting”, whereas consummatory anhedonia refers to the inability to experience pleasure related to online experience in response to a specific stimulus or “liking”. Only three studies [9] [10] [13] have explored anticipatory and consummatory anhedonia in PD using the Temporal experience of pleasure scale (TEPS, [11] ) or two subscales of the revised Physical Anhedonia Scale (PAS, [14] ) and reported higher consummatory anhedonia in PD comparatively to healthy subjects or non- Parkinson motor neurological disease.

Independently of anticipatory and consummatory types of anhedonia, anhedonia could constitute either a state or a trait. These two types of anhedonia are evaluated using different rating scales including different scoring instructions that rate either recent hedonic situations or long-term hedonic experiences. The SHAPS [15] or the anhedonia subscale of the Beck Depression Inventory-II [16] rates anhedonia state although the PAS, the Social Anhedonia Scale (SAS) [14] or the TEPS rates anhedonia trait. However, several studies in various groups of clinical or non-clinical subjects [11] [17] -[19] have examined the relationships between the TEPS and the SHAPS, PAS, SAS or BDI-II anhedonia subscale. The results found that the SHAPS and the BDI-II anhedonia subscale rate consummatory and anticipatory anhedonia state especially, the PAS rates consummatory and anticipatory anhedonia trait and the SAS rates anticipatory anhedonia trait. Thus, the use of the SHAPS, BDI-II anhedonia subscale, TEPS, PAS and SAS allows distinguishing state or trait of anhedonia and anticipatory or consummatory anhedonia.

Six studies [4] [6] -[10] have compared the scores on the SHAPS, which rates anhedonia state, or the prevalence of anhedonia using the cut off of 3 on this scale, between PD patients and controls. Four of these studies [6] -[9] reported significant differences and two [4] [10] non-significant differences. It is interesting to note that the two studies that reported non-significant differences used non-healthy control group (osteoarthritis or non- Parkinson motor neurological disease).

Thus, the existence of state hedonic deficit remains an open question in PD. The aim of the present study was to explore state anhedonia, using the BDI-II anhedonia subscale, in PD compared to patients with a non-Park- inson motor neurological disease.

The two groups did not differ significantly on the anhedonia subscale score of the BDI-II. The mean scores of the scale (SD) of the PD and controls were 2.39 (SD = 1.71) and 2.12 (SD = 1.99), respectively (U = 847, p =

^aLevel of education: I < baccalaureate, II = baccalaureate; III > baccalaureate; baccalaureate corresponds to the end of secondary school studies, i.e. 12 years of accredited education after the age of 6; BDI-II: Beck Depression Inventory-II.

0.26). Concerning the 18-BDI, the PD had significantly higher scores than the controls. The mean scores of the scale (SD) of the PD and controls were 16.12 (SD = 7.73) and 12.87 (SD = 9.94), respectively (U = 724, p = 0.034).

PD subjects were not characterized by higher levels of anhedonia state, as rated by the anhedonia subscale of the BDI-II, compared with subjects presenting a non-Parkinson motor neurological disease. The two groups were not significantly different for age, gender, educational level. The control group included non-Parkinson motor neurological disease thus allowing testing the specificity of PD. To our knowledge, no study has compared the score of the anhedonia subscale of the BDI-II between PD and control group.

Six studies have compared the level of state anhedonia using the SHAPS in PD subjects and controls.

Four studies found significant differences. Lemke et al. [6] reported significantly higher scores on the SHAPS in a group of 626 PD subjects compared with the scores found in 50 healthy volunteers. The sex-ratio and age were not compared between the groups although there were more females and the subjects were older in the PD group. Santangelo et al. [7] reported significantly higher scores on the SHAPS in 74 depressed PD subjects or 76 non-depressed subjects compared with the scores of 74 healthy controls. In this study the three groups were not significantly different for age and sex-ratio but the educational level was unknown. Fujiwara et al. [8] have compared 100 outpatients with PD and 111 healthy subjects recruited in a group of caregivers and care managers. The two groups did not differ significantly for age but there were significantly more females in controls than in PD. The difference regarding gender was not controlled for and the educational level was not rated. The authors reported significantly higher scores on the SHAPS for the PD patients compared with the scores of controls. Jordan et al. [9] reported significantly higher scores on the SHAPS for 50 patients with PD compared with the scores on 42 healthy controls. The controls were significantly older than the PD patients and the status of patients (in or outpatients) or the rate of males were unknown. Thus, the potential effects of age, gender, educational level and status were not controlled for in all of the four studies.

Two studies found no significant difference. Pluck & Brown [4] have compared 45 PD outpatients with 17 similarly disabled outpatients with osteoarthritis. The two groups were not significantly different for age or sex ratio but the level of education was higher for PD patients than for controls. No significant difference was observed between the two groups on the SHAPS scores. Loas et al. [10] using the same sample as the present study did not find significant differences on the SHAPS between PD patients and non-Parkinson motor neurological disease patients. In this study, gender, age, educational level and status of patients (all the patients were outpatients) were controlled for.

The results of this study suggest that Parkinson’s disease patients were not characterized by high level of anhedonia state, as assessed by the anhedonia subscale of the BDI-II.

GwenoléLoas,PierreKrystkowiak,11, (2015) Is State Anhedonia Characteristic of Parkinson’s Disease?. Advances in Aging Research,04,225-229. doi: 10.4236/aar.2015.46024