<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Applied Mathematics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-7385</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/am.2015.612177</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AM-61201</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  A Two-Point Boundary Value Problem by Using a Mixed Finite Element Method
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>edro</surname><given-names>Pablo Cárdenas Alzate</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>José</surname><given-names>Rodrigo González Granada</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Mathematics, Universidad Tecnoloacute;gica de Pereira, Pereira, Colombia</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>09</day><month>11</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>1996</fpage><lpage>2003</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>9</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>15</month>	<year>November</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>18</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  This paper describes a numerical solution for a two-point boundary value problem. It includes an algorithm for discretization by mixed finite element method. The discrete scheme allows the utilization a finite element method based on piecewise linear approximating functions and we also use the barycentric quadrature rule to compute the stiffness matrix and the 
  <em>L</em>
  <sub>2</sub>-norm.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Two-Point BVP</kwd><kwd> Galerkin’s Method</kwd><kwd> Non-Symmetric Problem</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Finite element methods in which two spaces are used received the domination of mixed finite element method. Sometimes a second variable is introduced in the formulation of the problem by its physical study, for example in the case of elasticity equations and also the Stokes equations where the mixed formulation is the natural one. The mathematical analyses of mixed finite element have been widely developed in the seventies. A general analysis was first developed by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61201-ref1">1</xref>] . We also have to mention to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61201-ref2">2</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61201-ref3">3</xref>] which introduced of the fundamental ideas for the analysis of mixed finite elements. We also refer to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61201-ref4">4</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61201-ref5">5</xref>] where general results are obtained.</p><p>An outline of the paper is as follows. We derive the mixed variational formulation for bilinear form non- symmentric problem and we define the related discrete elements and the error analysis of the associated finite element method is made [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61201-ref6">6</xref>] . We generalize the results to mixed methods using rectangular elements and we use the barycentric quadrature rule to compute the stiffness matrix, the load vector and the L<sub>2</sub>-norm. Finally, numerical experiments are given to illustrate the present theory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61201-ref7">7</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Error in the Finite Element Solution</title><p>Recall that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in one dimension by Sobolev’s inequality, so that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is defined for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. We can prove that with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1489"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x11.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1490"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x12.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In fact, by definition we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1491"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x13.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the polynomial of degree 1 approximating v in<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1492"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x16.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1493"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x17.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1494"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x18.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>therefore, the error is of order <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> because the fitting is until the second derivative, then</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1495"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x20.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1496"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x21.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now, we know that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1497"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x22.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>So, we can write <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1498"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x24.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>then we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1499"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x25.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>So</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1500"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x26.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>To write the norm in<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, fort take square</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1501"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x28.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Next, integrate with respect to <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we have:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1502"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x30.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Taking the square root finally we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1503"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x31.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1504"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x32.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Galerkin’s Method</title><p>Galerkin’s method: Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfy the assumptions of the Lax-Milgram lemma</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1505"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x35.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1506"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x36.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1507"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x37.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be the solution of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be a finite-dimensional subspace and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be determined by Galerkin’s method: <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>for all<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. We want to prove that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1508"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x44.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> symmetric,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1509"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x46.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1510"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x47.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In fact, let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Thus,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1511"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x52.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now, from the assumptions of the Lax-Milgram lemma we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1512"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x53.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. And</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1513"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x55.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Divide by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> both sides we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1514"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x57.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now, using (5), we get that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1515"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x58.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Finally, we can prove (4)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1516"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x59.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now, for the symmetric <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we can apply Riesz representation theorem. Therefore the norm of the inner product can be written as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1517"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x61.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Similar to previous proof, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1518"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x62.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1519"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x63.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Therefore</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1520"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x64.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>As for the norm in V, we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1521"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x65.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From the assumptions we obtain</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1522"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x66.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>With <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1523"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x69.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using this inequality, (6) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1524"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x70.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We know that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1525"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x71.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>from Equation (4) which was proven in the previous section, therefore</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1526"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x72.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. FEM for Bilinear Form Non-Symmetric Problem</title><p>We consider the problem</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1527"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x73.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. A finite element method for this problem with an error bound in the <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>-norm is as follows. First we need to find the variational formulation for this problem. In fact, multiply by a function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1528"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x80.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Next, integrate over the domain<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x81.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1529"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x82.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now, the left hand side can be written using integrating by parts:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1530"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x83.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Therefore we have the bilinear form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1531"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x84.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and the linear functional</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1532"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x85.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is dense in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and by Lax Milgram theorem, there is a weak solution in<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x89.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is coercive in<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x88.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x89.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, therefore</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1533"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x91.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The bilinear form is also bounded:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1534"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x92.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now, we would like to minimize the residual</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1535"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x93.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Also we have (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61201-ref2">2</xref>] )</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1536"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x94.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Therefore, we can apply the previously proven statement (2) in order to estimate a bound for the error</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1537"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x96.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which for our case become</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1538"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x97.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. BVP by Finite Element Method</title><p>We consider the boundary value problem</p><fig-group id="fig1"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Mesh used to solve the problem (7) by using (8).</title></caption><fig id ="fig1_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x98.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> (a) Solution of the system (7) using<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x100.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>; (b) Error of the approximation in (a), compared to the real solution; (c) Solution of the system (7) using<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x100.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x101.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>; (d) Error of the approximation in (b), compared to the real solution</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x99.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Logarithmic plot of the L<sub>2</sub>-norm of the error vs. the choice of h</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x102.png"/></fig><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1539"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x103.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We want to solve it by the finite element method</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1540"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x104.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>based on piecewise linear approximating functions on the partition<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, divided into triangles by inserting a diagonal with positive slope into each mesh-square with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. We will use the barycentric quadrature rule to compute the stiffness matrix, the load vector and the L<sub>2</sub>-norm. The <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows the mesh used to solve this problem (system (7)). With this mesh, the stiffness matrix A was computed considering each node, from a total of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> interior nodes (<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, which h is the step size). The basis function is a set of pyramidal functions. At each node, there are two triangles <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> coming at a straight angle, and four others coming with an acute angle<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x110.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The basis functions are therefore</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1541"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x111.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Therefore we obtain</p><p>・ <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. There are two triangles common to these neighboring nodes, therefore this inner product is<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x113.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. It is the same for the neighbours on the left <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x113.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x114.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (2 common triangles). Similarly for the neighbours on the rows above and below. This inner product was used in the stiffness matrix A.</p><p>・ The Barycentric Quadrature Rule were used to evaluate the integral on the right hand side,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1542"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x115.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1543"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x116.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where K is each triangle in the mesh, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>the vertices.</p><p>・ <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows the solution of (7) for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (panel A) and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (panel C). Compared to the correct solution</p><disp-formula id="scirp.61201-formula1544"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x120.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>the errors are shown in (panel B) and (panel C) respectively.</p><p>・ <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7402931x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>norm of this error is shown <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgments</title><p>We thank the editor and the referee for their comments and group GEDNOL of the Universidad Tecnol&#243;gica de Pereira-Colombia.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Pedro Pablo C&#225;rdenas Alzate,Jos&#233; Rodrigo Gonz&#225;lez Granada, (2015) A Two-Point Boundary Value Problem by Using a Mixed Finite Element Method. Applied Mathematics,06,1996-2003. doi: 10.4236/am.2015.612177</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.61201-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Brezzi</surname><given-names> F. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1974</year>)<article-title>On the Existence, Uniqueness and Approximation of Saddle Points Problems Arising from Lagrangian Multipliers</article-title><source> ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis—Mod&amp;eacute;lisation Math&amp;eacute;matique et Analyse Num&amp;eacute;rique</source><volume> 8</volume>,<fpage> 129</fpage>-<lpage>151</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61201-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Larsson, S. and Thome, V. (2009) Partial Differential Equations with Numerical Methods. Springer-Verlag, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61201-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Canuto, C. and Hussaini, M. (1988) Spectral Methods in Fluids Dynamics. Springer Series in Computational Physics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84108-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61201-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fortin</surname><given-names> M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1977</year>)<article-title>An Analysis of the Convergence of Mixed Finite Element Methods. R.A.I.R</article-title><source>O</source><volume> 11</volume>,<fpage> 341</fpage>-<lpage>354</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61201-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guzman, J. (2010) A Unified Analysis of Several Mixed Methods for Elasticity with Weak Stress Symmetric. Journal of Scientific Computing, 4, 156-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10915-010-9373-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61201-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yao, C. and Jia, S. (2014) Asymptotic Expansion Analysis of Nonconforming Mixed Finite Element Methods for Time-Dependent Maxwell’s Equations in Debye Medium. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 229, 34-40.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2013.12.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61201-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pal, M. and Lamine, S. (2015) Validation of the Multiscale Mixed Finite-Element Method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 77, 206-223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fld.3978</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>