1. Introduction

Agricultural Sciences

2156-8553

Scientific Research Publishing

10.4236/as.2015.611125

AS-61075

Articles

Biomedical&Life Sciences Earth&Environmental Sciences

Broadleaf Weed Control in Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) with Preemergence-Applied Pyroxasulfone with and without Sulfentrazone

eshadri

S. Reddy

¹^*Phillip

W. Stahlman

¹Patrick

W. Geier

Agricultural Research Center, Kansas State University, Hays, KS, USA

* E-mail:sajjala.reddy@gmail.com(ESR);

13112015

06111309131626 September 2015accepted 10 November 13 November 2015

2014

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

A field study was conducted at two locations in Kansas, USA in 2011 and 2012 to test weed control efficacy and crop response to preemergence-applied pyroxasulfone alone and in combination with sulfentrazone in sunflower. Treatments included three rates of pyroxasulfone (100, 200 and 400 g ·ha ^-1) applied alone and tank-mixed with sulfentrazone at 70, 140 and 280 g ·ha ^-1. Commercial standards sulfentrazone at 140 g ·ha ^-1 + pendimethalin at 1390 g ·ha ^-1 and sulfentrazone at 140 g ·ha ^-1 + S-metolachlor at 1280 g ·ha ^-1 were also included. Pyroxasulfone at 100 g ·ha ^-1 controlled Palmer amaranth 87% at 3 weeks after application (WAA), but control decreased to 76% at 6 WAA. Increasing pyroxasulfone rate to ≥200 g ·ha ^-1 or tank mixing with sulfentazone at 140 g ·ha ^-1 provided ≥90% Palmer amaranth control for at least 6 WAA. Sulfentrazone alone at 70 g ·ha ^-1 controlled Palmer amaranth 77% at 3 WAA, but control dropped to 69% at 6 WAA. Increasing sulfentrazone rate from 70 to 140 or 280 g ·ha ^-1 increased control to >90% at 3 WAA, but did not maintain acceptable control at 6 WAA. Tank mixing sulfentrazone at 140 g ·ha ^-1 with pendimethalin at 1390 g ·ha ^-1 or S-metolachlor at 1280 g ·ha ^-1 controlled Palmer amaranth ≥90 and 84% at 3 WAA and 6 WAA, respectively. The lowest rate of pyroxasulfone (100 g ·ha ^-1) controlled kochia 98% and the control was complete with all other treatments. However, no treatment provided as much as 90% puncturevine control at 3 WAA and the control was commercially unacceptable (<75%) at 6 WAA. No treatment visibly injured sunflower anytime during the season or reduced sunflower plant population.

Pyroxasulfone Sulfentrazone Sunflower Weed Control Palmer Amaranth Kochia

1. Introduction

In the United States, sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) is cultivated in the Great Plains Region for cooking oil, confectionary uses, and birdseed. In 2014, confection and oil-seed sunflower were planted on 0.63 million ha [1] . North Dakota (0.27 million ha), South Dakota (0.22 million ha) and Kansas (0.03 million ha) are the three major sunflower-growing states in the country. As with most field crops, sunflower is vulnerable to weed interference, especially during first 3 to 4 weeks after planting [2] . Maximum seed yields are reported when sunflower is kept weed free 4 to 6 weeks after planting [3] . Biennial wormwood (Artemisia biennis Willd.), Russian thistle (Salsola iberica Sennen & Pau), Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense L. Scop.), green foxtail (Setaria viridis), kochia (Kochia scoparia L. Schrad.), redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.), wild buckwheat (Polygonum convolvulus L.), common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.) and common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) are among the most common weeds interfering with sunflowers in the northern Great Plains (Minnesota, North Dakota, and South Dakota) [4] . The most common and troublesome weeds in sunflower fields in the central Great Plains (Colorado and Kansas) are Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson), kochia, puncturevine (Tribulus terrestris L.) and Russian thistle [4] .

Weeds can cause significant sunflower yield loss. Yield loss as much as 60% has been reported when a weed population consisting of large crabgrass Digitaria sanguinalis L. Scop.), goosegrass (Eleusine indica L. Gaertn.), sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia L.), tall morningglory (Ipomea purpturea L. Roth), ivy leaf morningglory (I. hederacea L. Jacq.), and redroot pigweed competed with sunflowers for 8 weeks after planting [3] . Wild oat (Avena fatua L.) interference reduced sunflower yields by 54% [5] . Season-long competition by kochia at densities of 0.3, 1, 3, and 6 plants∙m⁻¹ of row decreased sunflower seed yield by 7%, 10%, 20%, and 27%, respectively [6] . In a multi-location study in Northern Great Plains, when kochia plants emerged at the same time as the sunflowers, plant height, number of leaves, head diameter and stem diameter were reduced and as a result up to 76% yield losses were reported [7] . However, kochia plants that emerged after the four-leaf stage of the sunflower crop did not affect sunflower growth and development, yield, or seed quality [7] . Therefore, early weed management is necessary to prevent loss from weed interference in sunflower production. Most sunflower hectares receive a preemergence herbicide application but herbicide options for sunflower are limited, especially for control of many broadleaf weed species. Sulfentrazone, a protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PPO) inhibiting herbicide, is widely used for control of broadleaf weeds but it has little activity on grass weeds and is usually tank mixed with S-metolachlor or pendimethalin for broad spectrum weed control.

Pyroxasulfone (3-[[5-(difluoromethoxy)-1-methyl-3-(trifluoromethyl)pyrazol-4-yl]methylsulfonyl]-5,5-dimethyl-

4H-1,2-oxazole) is a relatively new herbicide in the pyrazole herbicide family. It has preemergence activity and inhibits shoot elongation of susceptible seedling plants by inhibiting the biosynthesis of very-long-chain fatty acids [8] . Though pyroxasulfone is from a different herbicide family, it has the same mode of action as chloroacetamide herbicides (Group 15) including acetochlor, dimethenamid, and metolachlor. However, pyroxasulfone has higher specific activity than other Group 15 herbicides which allows for much lower use rates compared to chloroacetamide herbicides. Studies from western Kansas reported similar or greater weed control with pyroxasulfone at 125 to 500 g∙ha⁻¹ compared to S-metolachlor at 1070 to 4260 g∙ha⁻¹, which means effective use rates of pyroxasulfone were as low as approximately 12% of S-metolachlor use rates [9] . Fall application of pyroxasulfone at 209 g∙ha⁻¹ controled broadleaf signalgrass (Urochloa platyphylla (Nash.) R.D. Webster) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medik.) as much as 85 and 77%, respectively at 197 days after treatment compared to 57 and 10%, respectively with S-metolachlor at the same rate [10] .

Pyroxasulfone is currently labeled in the United States for use in corn, soybean and wheat (Zidua®, BASF Corporation, 26 Davis Dr, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA). The maximum labeled use rate of pyroxasulfone for corn, soybean and wheat are 235, 206 and 118 g∙ha⁻¹, respectively. Several research reports have indicated effective annual grass and broadleaf weed control with pyroxasulfone. In non-irrigated corn in Kansas, pyroxasulfone at 250 g∙ha⁻¹ controlled green foxtail and Palmer amaranth 86 - 100% and 87 - 99%, respectively [9] . In furrow-irrigated corn in Montana, ≥94% control of velvetleaf and kochia, and ≥89% wild buckwheat control with 250 g∙ha⁻¹ of pyroxasulfone has been reported [11] . In a study in Louisiana, pyroxasulfone at 150 g∙ha⁻¹ controlled barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli L. Beauv), Palmer amaranth, and smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus L.) 96 to 100% at 20 days after application [12] . Dose-response curves showed pyroxasulfone at 200 to 300 g∙ha⁻¹ provided excellent control of most grasses and certain broadleaf species in corn for at least 4 weeks of growing season on soils with up to 3% organic matter [13] .

Pyroxasulfone currently is not registered for use in sunflower. However, multiple coordinated field experiments from North Dakota to Kansas over a three-year period indicated preemergence (PRE)-applied pyroxasulfone controlled many annual grass and broadleaf weeds as well or better at rates three to eight-times lower than herbicides currently registered for use in sunflower with only occasional incidences of minor injury that did not reduce seed yield [14] . In two of those experiments, pyroxasulone at 208 g∙ha⁻¹ controlled Palmer amaranth 87 - 97% and a tank mixture of 167 g∙ha⁻¹ pyroxasulfone plus 105 g∙ha⁻¹ sulfentrazone provided complete Palmer amaranth control [15] . The authors cautioned additional trials were needed to determine whether mixtures of pyroxasulfone and sulfentrazone consistently provide improved weed control compared to commercial herbicides. Hence, a study was conducted to evaluate weed control efficacy and sunflower response to different rates of pyroxasulfone with and without sulfentrazone.

2. Material and Methods

Field experiments were conducted during the 2011 and 2012 growing seasons near Hays (38.85N, 99.34W) and Colby (39.39N, 101.06W) in Kansas, USA. The Hays experimental site was rainfed and the Colby experimental site received supplemental irrigation periodically as needed to avoid moisture stress. Soil characteristics are shown in Table 1. Soil pH was measured in a 1:1 mixture of soil and water [16] and soil organic matter was measured by the Walkley-Black method [17] . The experimental design was a randomized complete block with four treatment replications. Experimental treatments included three rates of pyroxasulfone (100, 200 and 400 g∙ai∙ha⁻¹) applied alone and tank-mixed with sulfentrazone at 70, 140 and 280 g∙ai∙ha⁻¹. Tank mixtures of pendimethalin at 1390 g∙ai∙ha⁻¹ + sulfentrazone at 140 g∙ha⁻¹, S-metolachlor at 1280 g∙ai∙ha⁻¹ + sulfentrazone at 140 g∙ha⁻¹ and a non-treated control were also included. Sunflower hybrids used and seeding rates are shown in Ta- ble 1. Sunflower hybrids were midseason, medium-height hybrids with favorable drydown characteristics. Seeds were planted in rows spaced 76 cm apart. Plots were 3 by 6.7 m with four rows of sunflower. Herbicides were applied PRE to crop and weeds using a CO₂-powered backpack sprayer delivering 115 L∙ha⁻¹ at 220 kPa pressure.

The predominate weed species was Palmer amaranth at both locations in 2011 and 2012. Kochia was present only at Colby in 2011 and puncturevine was present at both locations in 2012. Weed control was rated visually on a scale of 0 (no effect) to 100 (complete control). Weed control ratings were determined 3 and 6 weeks after treatment across sites and years. Crop response also was rated visually at 3 weeks after treatment on a scale of 0 to 100. Unfortunately, seed yields were not determined because of late-season hail and/or substantial bird and wildlife damage (plants unrooted).

Data were analyzed using the general linear model procedure of the Statistical Analysis System (Statistical Analysis Systems Institute, Cary, NC, USA) and means were separated at the 5% significance level using Fisher’s protected LSD. Percent weed control data were arcsine transformed before analysis, but original values are

Table 1 Soil characteristics, planting and spraying information, 2011 and 2012

	Hays, KS		Colby, KS
	2011	2012	2011	2012
Geographic location	West-central Kansas		Northwest Kansas
Soil type	Roxbury silt loam	Crete silty clay loam	Keith silt loam	Keith silt loam
Soil pH	7.8	6.1	7.2	7.2
Organic matter (%)	2.0	1.8	2.0	2.0
Sunflower hybrid	Mycogen 8N358CLDM	Mycogen 8N421CLDM	Mycogen 8N358CLDM	Mycogen 8N358CLDM
Seed rate (Seeds∙ha⁻¹)	49,000	49,000	57,575	57,575
Planting date	6/17/2011	6/11/2012	6/14/2011	6/06/2012
Herbicide application date	6/20/2011	6/12/2012	6/15/2011	6/06/2012

presented in this paper. The control treatment was omitted from weed control analyses. Data were pooled over years and sites when there was no year-by-site-by-treatment interaction.

3. Results

Monthly mean temperature and total rainfall data at experimental sites during 2011 and 2012 are presented in Figure 1. Both years showed similar trends in air temperatures with highest in July and lowest in September and October. In 2011, a total of 276 and 360 mm rainfall was received during cropping season at Hays and Colby, respectively which was normal. However, in 2012, only around 50% of the normal rainfall was received at both locations. In 2011, rainfall at Hays within the 3 days before PRE herbicide application totaled 34 mm. The first beneficial rainfall was 25 mm at 17 days after herbicide application (DAA). At Colby, 46 mm rainfall was received over a period of 6 DAA. In 2012, 43 mm rainfall was received over a period of 4 DAA at Hays and 44 mm irrigation water was applied through overhead sprinkler system over a period of 5 DAA at Colby. Overall, the soil moisture received through rainfall or irrigation was sufficient to activate the PRE herbicides at both locations in 2011 and 2012.

3.1. Palmer Amaranth Control

Across sites and years, Palmer amaranth control with PRE-applied pyroxasulfone alone or in combination with sulfentrazone ranged from 87 to 99% at 3 weeks after application (WAA) and 76 to 98% at 6 WAA (Table 2). Pyroxasulfone alone at 100 g∙ha⁻¹ controlled Palmer amaranth 87% at 3 WAA. Increasing pyroxasulfone rate to 200 and 400 g∙ha⁻¹ increased Palmer amaranth control to 94 and 97%, respectively. These results were similar to those of studies in Texas where at least 90% Palmer amaranth control was achieved with 208 g∙ha⁻¹ of pyroxasulfone at 4 WAA [18] . In our study at 3 WAA, tank mixing pyroxasulfone at 100 g∙ha⁻¹ with sulfentrazone

Figure 1 Weather data during cropping season 2011 and 2012.

Table 2 Palmer amaranth and puncturevine control with pyroxasulfone and sulfentrazone combinations at 3 and 6 weeks after preemergence applicationa,b

Herbicide	Rate	Palmer amaranth		Puncturevine
		Pooled		Colby, 2012
		3 WAA	6 WAA	3 WAA	6 WAA
	g∙ha⁻¹	-----------------------------------------------%-----------------------------------------------
Pyroxasulfone	100	87 c	76 gf	80 a	64 ab
	200	94 abc	91 abcd	75 a	60 abc
	400	97 ab	97 ab	70 abc	54 abcde
Sulfentrazone	70	77 d	69 g	45 de	33 cdef
	140	92 abc	78 efg	40 e	15 f
	280	93 abc	83 def	68 abcd	45 bcde
Pyroxasulfone + Sulfentrazone	100 + 70	91 abc	86 bcdef	73 ab	57 abcd
	100 + 140	95 abc	93 abcd	70 abc	50 abcde
	100 + 280	97 ab	93 abcd	67 abcd	50 abcde
	200 + 70	95 abc	89 abcde	80 a	59 abc
	200 + 140	97 ab	94 abcd	86 a	63 ab
	200 + 280	97 ab	95 abc	83 a	66 ab
	400 + 70	97 ab	97 ab	80 a	64 ab
	400 + 140	97 ab	95 abc	88 a	74 a
	400 + 280	99 a	98 a	85 a	70 ab
Sulfentrazone + Pendimethalin	140 + 1390	90 bc	84 cdef	50 bcde	28 ef
Sulfentrazone + S-metolachlor	140 + 1280	91 abc	84 cdef	48 cde	30 ef

^aData were arcsine transformed before analysis, but original values are presented in the table; ^bMeans followed by the same letter do not differ significantly according to LSD at 5%.

at 280 g∙ha⁻¹ increased Palmer amaranth control to 97% compared to 87% for the same rate of pyroxasulfone alone; however, it was similar to the same rate of sulfentrazone alone (93%). Mixing higher rates of pyroxasulfone (200 and 400 g∙ha⁻¹) with any rate of sulfentrazone did not improve Palmer amaranth control. In a multi-location study conducted in Kansas, North Dakota and South Dakota, increased Palmer amaranth control by combining pyroxasulfone and sulfentrazone at the lowest rates tested (167 + 105 g∙ha⁻¹) compared to the same rate of pyroxasulfone alone was also reported previously [15] .

At 3 WAA, sulfentrazone alone at 70 g∙ha⁻¹ provided the least Palmer amaranth control (77%) of all the treatments tested (Table 2). Increasing sulfentrazone rate to 140 g∙ha⁻¹ increased Palmer amaranth control to 92%. Further increasing sulfentrazone rate from 140 to 280 g∙ha⁻¹ or tank mixing sulfentrazone at 140 g∙ha⁻¹ with pendimethalin at 1390 g∙ha⁻¹ or S-metolachlor at 1280 g∙ha⁻¹ did not improve control compared to sulfentrazone alone at 140 g∙ha⁻¹. Sulfentrazone at 140 g∙ha⁻¹ was similarly effective as any rate of pyroxasulfone alone.

As the season progressed, Palmer amaranth control decreased in sunflower plots treated with lowest rate of pyroxasulfone (Table 2). The control with pyroxasulfone alone at 100 g∙ha⁻¹ decreased to 76% at 6 WAA compared to 87% at 3 WAA. However, tank mixing pyroxasulfone at 100 g∙ha⁻¹ with sulfentrazone at 140 g∙ha⁻¹ or more maintained Palmer amaranth control >90% at 6 WAA. In a dose response study in a soil with 3% organic matter, it was reported that 152 g∙ha⁻¹ of pyroxasulfone was required for 90% control of tall waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) at 4 WAA [13] . It was also reported that 198 g∙ha⁻¹ of pyroxasulfone was needed to achieve 90% control at 6 WAA. In our study, pyroxasulfone at 200 and 400 g∙ha⁻¹, with or without sulfentrazone, controlled Palmer amaranth >90% at 6 WAA and there was little decline in control compared to 3 WAA. Conversely, Palmer amaranth control decreased to 69, 78 and 83% at 6 WAA compared to 77, 92 and 93% at 3 WAA in plots treated with sulfentrazone alone at 70, 140 and 280 g∙ha⁻¹, respectively. Tank mixing sulfentrazone at 140 g∙ha⁻¹ with pendimethalin at 1390 g∙ha⁻¹ or S-metolachlor at 1280 g∙ha⁻¹ did not improve Palmer amaranth control compared to sulfentrazone alone at 6 WAA. These results suggested that pyroxasulfone was more persistent and provided longer weed control compared to sulfentrazone. Pyroxasulfone has a relatively long soil half-life (35 to 45 days) [19] .

3.2. Puncturevine Control

At Colby in 2012, no treatment provided >88% puncturevine control at 3 WAA (Table 2). Pyroxasulfone at 100 g∙ha⁻¹ controlled puncturevine 80% at 3 WAA but control declined to 64% at 6 WAA. Increasing pyroxasulfone rate to ≥200 g∙ha⁻¹ or tank mixing with sulfentrazone did not increase puncturevine control. Sulfentrazone at 70 and 140 g∙ha⁻¹ provided much less puncturevine control (45 and 40%, respectively) compared to pyroxasulfone at 100 g∙ha⁻¹. In an earlier study also in Kansas, poor puncturevine control (68%) with sulfentrazone at 140 g∙ha⁻¹ was reported [20] . In the present study, increasing the rate of sulfentrazone from 140 to 280 g∙ha⁻¹ increased puncturevine control from 40 to 68%. However, tank mixing sulfentrazone at 140 g∙ha⁻¹ with S-me- tolachlor at 1280 g∙ha⁻¹ or pendimethalin at 1390 g∙ha⁻¹ did not increase control compared to the same rate of sulfentrazone alone.

At 6 WAA, puncturevine control decreased considerably with all treatments compared to 3 WAA. No treatment provided ≥75% control (Table 2). Even the highest rates of pyroxasulfone and sulfentrazone (400 and 280 g∙ha⁻¹, respectively) did not provide commercially acceptable puncturevine control (54 and 45%, respectively). Greatest puncturevine control (74%) at 6 WAA was achieved with pyroxasulfone at 400 g∙ha⁻¹ + sulfentrazone at 140 g∙ha⁻¹. However, in comparison, the commercial standards sulfentrazone at 140 g∙ha⁻¹ plus S-metolachlor at 1280 g∙ha⁻¹ or pendimethalin at 1390 g∙ha⁻¹ provided ≤30% control. At Hays, no significant difference in puncturevine control was observed among herbicide treatments (data not shown). Puncturevine control at Hays ranged from 83 to 96% at 3 WAA and 78 to 91% at 6 WAA. Heavy puncturevine seed bank in the soil at Colby could be the reason for lower performance of herbicide treatments against puncturevine at Colby compared to Hays.

3.3. Kochia Control

At Colby, PRE-applied pyroxasulfone at 100 g∙ha⁻¹ controlled kochia 98% and 200 and 400 g∙ha⁻¹ rates provided 100% control at 3 WAA (Table 3). Similarly, in a study in Montana, 95 - 100% control of kochia with 250 g∙ha⁻¹ of pyroxasulfone has been reported [11] . Sulfentrazone at 70 g∙ha⁻¹ also controlled kochia 99%;

Table 3 Kochia control with pyroxasulfone and sulfentrazone combinations at 3 weeks after preemergence application, Colby, 2011a,b

	g∙ha⁻¹	Sulfentrazone
		------------------------------------------------g∙ha⁻¹-----------------------------------------------
		0	70	140	280
		--------------------------------------------------%--------------------------------------------------
Pyroxasulfone	0	-	99 b	100 a	100 a
	100	98 b	100 a	100 a	100 a
	200	100 a	100 a	100 a	100 a
	400	100 a	100 a	100 a	100 a
Pendimethalin	1390	-	-	100 a	-
S-metolachlor	1280	-	-	100 a	-

^aData were arcsine transformed before analysis, but original values are presented in the table; ^bMeans followed by the same letter do not differ significantly according to LSD at 5%.

complete control at higher rates. Combinations of sulfentrazone at 140 g∙ha⁻¹ plus S-metolachlor at 1280 g∙ha⁻¹ or pendimethalin at 1390 g∙ha⁻¹ also provided complete control of kochia at 3 WAA. There was little or no change in kochia control for any treatment from 3 to 6 WAA (data not shown).

3.4. Crop Injury

No treatment visibly injured sunflower anytime during the season or reduced plant population in any site-year (data not shown). This is consistent with previous reports of excellent tolerance of sunflower to pyroxasulfone over a wide range of soils and environments [14] [15] .

Results from this study support previous findings and indicate pyroxasulfone has potential to be a valuable preemergence herbicide in sunflower. Combinations of pyroxasulfone at 100 g∙ha⁻¹ and sulfentrazone at 140 g∙ha⁻¹ or pyroxasulfone alone at 200 g∙ha⁻¹ provided similar or greater broadleaf weed control with no crop injury compared to commercial standards sulfentrazone at 140 g∙ha⁻¹ plus S-metolachlor at 1280 g∙ha⁻¹ or pendimethalin at 1390 g∙ha⁻¹. Additional studies are needed on additional weed species over wide range of soils and environmental conditions.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank BASF Corporation for their financial support of this project. Contribution number 16-142-J from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station.

Cite this paper

SeshadriS. Reddy,Phillip W.Stahlman,Patrick W.Geier, (2015) Broadleaf Weed Control in Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) with Preemergence-Applied Pyroxasulfone with and without Sulfentrazone. Agricultural Sciences,06,1309-1316. doi: 10.4236/as.2015.611125

References1

USDA-NASS (United States Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service) (2014) Data and Statistics/Quick Stats. USDA-NASS, Washington DC. www.quickstats.nass.usda.gov/

Thompson, C.R., Peterson, D.E., Lyon, D.J., Olson, B.L.S., Kniss, A.R. and Falk, J.S. (2009) Weed Control. In: Meyer, R., Belshe, D., O’Brien, D. and Darling, R., Eds., High Plains Sunflower Production Handbook. MF-2384, Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service, Manhattan, 8-10.

Johnson

B.J.

,et al. (1971)Effect of Weed Competition on Sunflower Weed Science 19, 378-380.

Kandel, H. (2014) 2013 National Sunflower Association Survey. http://www.sunflowernsa.com/uploads/resources/683/2013.sunflower.survey_kandel_2014.pdf

Chubb, W.O. and Friesen, G.H. (1985) Wild Oat Interference in Sunflower. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 65, 219-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/cjps85-031

Durgan, B.R., Dexter, A.G. and Miller, S.D. (1990) Kochia (Kochia scoparia) Interference in Sunflower (Helianthus annuus). Weed Technology, 4, 52-56.

Lewis, D.W. and Gulden, R.H. (2014) Effect of Kochia (Kochia scoparia) Interference on Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) Yield. Weed Science, 62, 158-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-13-00069.1

Tanetani, Y., Kaku, K., Kawae, K., Fujioka, T. and Shimizu, T. (2009) Action Mechanism of a Novel Herbicide Pyroxasulfone. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 95, 47-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2009.06.003

Geier, P.W., Stahlman, P.W. and Frihauf, J.C. (2006) KIH-485 and S-Metolachlor Efficacy Comparisons in Conventional and No-Tillage Corn. Weed Technology, 20, 622-626. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WT-05-048R2.1

Kurtz, M.E. (2011) Pyroxasulfone for Use in Southern States Soybean Production. Proceedings of Southern Weed Science Society, 64, 57.

King, S.R. and Garcia, J.O. (2008) Annual Broadleaf Control with KIH-485 in Glyphosate-Resistant Furrow Irrigated Corn. Weed Technology, 22, 420-424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WT-07-169.1

Hardwick, J.M. (2013) Evaluation of Pyroxasulfone in Corn (Zea mays L.) and Soybean (Glycine max L. MERR.) Weed Management Programs. Thesis Submitted to Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.

Knezevic, S.Z., Datta, A., Scott, J. and Porpiglia, P.J. (2009) Dose-Response Curves of KIH-485 for Preemergence Weed Control in Corn. Weed Technology, 23, 34-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WT-08-097.1

Stahlman, P.W., Olson, B.L.S., Thompson, C.R. and Zollinger, R.K. (2010) Pyroxasulfone (KIH-485) for Weed Control in Sunflower. Proceedings of the 1st Australian Summer Grains Conference, Gold Coast, 21-24 June 2010, 1-7.

Olson, B.L., Zollinger, R.K., Thompson, C.R., Peterson, D.E., Jenks, B., Moechnig, M. and Stahlman, P.W. (2011) Pyroxasulfone with and without Sulfentrazone in Sunflower (Helianthus annuus). Weed Technology, 25, 217-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-10-00089.1

Robertson, G.P., Sollins, P., Ellis, B.G. and Lajtha, K. (1999) Exchangeable Ions, pH, and Cation Exchange Capacity. In: Robertson, G.P., Coleman, D.C., Bledsoe, C.S. and Sollins, P., Eds., Standard Soil Methods for Long-Term Ecological Research, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 106-114.

Combs, S.M. and Nathan, M.V. (1998) Soil Organic Matter. In: Brown, J.R., Ed., Recommended Chemical Soil Test Procedures for the North Central Region, North Central Regional Research Publication No. 221 (Revised), SB 1001, Missouri Agriculture Experiment Station, Columbia, 53-58.

Gregory, L.S., Porpiglia, P.J. and Chandler, J.M. (2005) Efficacy of KIH-485 on Texas Panicum (Panicum texanum) and Selected Broadleaf Weeds in Corn. Weed Technology, 19, 866-869. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WT-04-229R1.1

Anonymous (2006) KIH-485 Experimental Herbicide. Kumiai Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., White Plains, 8 p.

Reddy, S.S., Stahlman, P.W., Geier, P.W. and Thompson, C.R. (2012) Weed Control and Crop Safety with Premixed S-Metolachlor and Sulfentrazone in Sunflower. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 11, 1625-1631. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2012.311197