<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JSS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Social Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-5952</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jss.2015.311011</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JSS-61032</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Synthesis of Research on Video Games for the Four Second Language Skills and Vocabulary Practice
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>nastassiya</surname><given-names>Yudintseva</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>Department of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>y_anastassiya@hotmail.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>11</day><month>11</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>81</fpage><lpage>98</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>7</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>9</month>	<year>November</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>12</day>	<month>November</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The purpose of the present paper is to identify trends in the digital game-based second language learning research by synthesizing findings according to game types and genres, and their effect on reading, writing, speaking, listening skills, and vocabulary outcomes. A total of 26 studies were synthesized. The synthesis concludes that overall, both commercial and serious games and synthetic immersive environments have positive effects on learning outcomes, especially vocabulary. At the same time, the effectiveness of one game type or genre may depend on learners’ gender, second language proficiency, gaming experience, and specific educational objectives. Traditional drill-and-practice may be more effective for vocabulary consolidation than some commercial games. Some learners may still prefer conventional instructions. Recommendations for further research are discussed.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Digital Game-Based Learning</kwd><kwd> Video Games</kwd><kwd> Second Language Learning</kwd><kwd> Second Language Acquisition</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Computer games have been a part of our lives for over 50 years. In 1962, Steve Russell started the gaming movement with the development of Spacewar [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref1">1</xref>] . Since that time, the gaming industry has been constantly changing and growing. Presently, people worldwide spend 21 billion hours a week playing online video games [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref2">2</xref>] and not only for the sole purpose of entertainment. The research established the relationship between video gaming and real life learning [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref3">3</xref>] . In fact, theorists argue that when learners play some video games abstract concepts from textbooks make a real or “situated meaning” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref4">4</xref>] because they “treat the game as a world and they probe it and reflect on its responses in hopes of accomplishing their goals” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref5">5</xref>] . Moreover, some video games facilitate the development of reading comprehension, basic knowledge, decision-making, collaboration, inductive logic, and strategic planning [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref6">6</xref>] . In such a way, video games are engaging environments that support repeated and challenging [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref7">7</xref>] interactions to help learners practice and enhance skills.</p><p>In the domain of computer assisted language learning (CALL), there are two approaches of implementing video games into the second language classroom: (1) adopt commercial off the shelf (COTS) games, which are created with the purpose of entertainment and (2) design synthetic immersive environments (SIEs) or serious games to support specific educational objectives. In other words, COTS games act, “as environments that may incidentally support language-specific learning” and serious games and SIEs “include an identifiable teaching presence specifically for improving some aspect of language proficiency” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref8">8</xref>] . The main difference between serious games and SIEs is the design and delivery of the educational context. SIEs are virtual online collaborative spaces or platforms such as multi-user virtual environments (MUVEs) that have integrated features of commercial massively multiplayer online games (MMORPGs) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref9">9</xref>] . Serous games, for instance, Food Force, have the features of commercial video games and can be played alone.</p><p>Peterson [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref10">10</xref>] identified the following game genres of both COTS and serious games and SIEs: MMORPG, simulation, adventure, first person shooter, sports, rhythm, manipulation, and MUVEs. MMORPGs, for example, World of Warcraft and Ultima Online require players to interact and collaborate with each other to complete quests in the virtual world. Simulation games, for instance, The Sims, simulate the situations that may occur in a real life. The distinctive feature of adventure games such as Bone is a narrative and interactive storyline. First person shooter games (e.g., Counter-Strike, America’s Army or Call of Duty) were designed to repel the attacks with the weapon from a first person perspective. In sports video games players are a part of a sport team and encounter a simulation of football (FIFA), baseball (MLB), basketball (NBA), or hockey game (NHL). Rhythm games (e,g., Dance Central, PaRappa the Rapper, Guitar Hero) combine music, aural or textual language, and players’ physical actions. In manipulation games such as Word War or The Writing Pal players should modify text, or match pictures with aural language in order to win the game. MUVEs are simulations of virtual world with a user-created content. Other types of SIEs may include augmented reality games (ARGs) that integrate augmented reality technology in such a way that real-life object or information becomes interactive and manipulative through digital devices; adaptive hypermedia system (AHS) for the teaching of languages at early age; and custom built platforms such as VirtUAM (Appendix A). With the development of new technologies video games can be played on a variety of platforms such as Personal Computers (PC), mobile devices (cell phones, tablets), and consoles (e.g., PlayStation, Xbox, Wii). In spite of the growing popularity of video games for language learning, there has been comparatively little exploration of the relationship between video games and second language acquisition.</p><p>In the area of second language acquisition, video games have attracted increasing attention from educational scholars over the last decade. A number of researchers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref11">11</xref>] synthesized findings in this domain. Cornillie, Thorne and Desmet [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref8">8</xref>] quantitatively compared 82 studies in the field of digital game-based second language learning to explore the changes in research types from 1984 to 2010. The researchers found that the majority of studies were focused on conceptual design, development, and technological evaluation of game- based learning environments. The authors concluded that such attention to design issues might constitute a solid foundation for the “advancement of tutorial CALL tools as embedded elements within gaming environments” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref8">8</xref>] . This large-scale meta-analysis is significant in terms of further research design applications; however, it does not address the relationship between video games and second language acquisition.</p><p>In a recent longitudinal literature review, Peterson [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref10">10</xref>] observed 27 studies published from 1970 to 2011 in the field of CALL. The review suggests that video games have positive effects on second language learners’ engagement, motivation, spoken and written output, reading comprehension, pronunciation, and vocabulary acquisition. The negative aspects of gaming include learners’ production of frequent errors, the lack of in-game features control, and mismatch between learners’ expectations and game content. Although Peterson covered more than three decades of publications and discussed the methods, procedures, and limitations of each study in-depth, the question of gender, age, second language proficiency, and gaming experience and their relationship to video games language outcomes was not raised.</p><p>Reinhardt [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref11">11</xref>] evaluated 28 articles published from 2002 to 2012 and looked at CALL informed and digital game-based second language learning parameters such as second language acquisition approach, research methods, measures and instruments, second language focus, game genre, context, and design elements, and learners’ perceptions. Reinhardt found that video games are beneficial for second language learners’ confidence and willingness to communicate, literacy development, and autonomous learning. Among the challenges, Reinhart underlined the linguistically diverse and complicated in-game language and learners’ focus on game mechanics at the expense of language acquisition. However, Reinhardt did not mention learner demographics and did not draw any conclusions about which particular language skills can be developed through gaming, nor did he separate the language outcomes by game types and genres.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Purpose and Significance of Synthesis</title><p>In spite of growing attention to the effectiveness of video games on second language acquisition, the lack of a systematic research review in this area is evident. The review of previous research analyses identified gaps in the data collected. The lack of data synthesis on sample, game types, and genres requires further exploration. Commonly agreed upon views on language teaching and learning recognize that vocabulary, listening, reading, speaking, and writing are essential for the development of second language proficiency [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref12">12</xref>] . In order to gather more conclusive evidence about the educational value of video games, a stronger focus on the use of video games in these domains of language acquisition would be beneficial.</p><p>Digital game-based second language learning is a relatively new field, so there is limited number of empirical studies, which makes it difficult to conduct a meta-analysis. A synthesis of best evidence, on the other hand, is possible [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref11">11</xref>] . Reinhardt [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref11">11</xref>] argues that “exploratory and descriptive syntheses are important to determine common, operative elements of any analysis”. Thus, the purpose of the present paper is to identify trends in the digital game-based second language learning research by synthesizing findings according to game types and genres, and their effect on the four language skills and vocabulary outcomes. This synthesis addresses to fill the gap in the literature and answer the following questions:</p><p>1) What video game types and genres are more accessible with respect to language variety, delivery, and language skills practice?</p><p>2) Is there a relationship between participants’ age, gender, language proficiency, gaming experience and video games language outcomes?</p><p>3) What video game types have greater potential for second language skills and vocabulary acquisition?</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Method</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Data Collection and Inclusion Criteria</title><p>The electronic databases searched in the current review included ERIC, SpringerLink, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, Science Direct, ProQuest Dissertations &amp; Theses, and Google Scholar. The search was focused on the research published in the peer-reviewed journals, government reports, PhD dissertations, and conference proceedings relevant to ESL, CALL, and gaming. The search terms used were “digital game-based learning” and “video games” in combination with “second language learning” and “second language acquisition”. To address the main purpose of a synthesis, studies were considered relevant if they (1) contained evidence of video games’ effects on four language skills and vocabulary outcomes, (2) provided sample data (gender and/or age, and second language), (3) provided information on game types and particular skills acquisition, (4) were in English, and (5) were published from January 2005 to January 2015. The synthesis focus is on qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method studies involving male and female participants that are over 6 years old. Studies were excluded from the analyses if they had no information on game types or genres and if they were focused on affective variables such as motivation and attitudes. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows the screening process of the 26 selected papers.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Data Analysis and Coding</title><p>The 26 papers that met the inclusion criteria were coded according to both video game and CALL-informed parameters [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref11">11</xref>] . Video game parameters included game types (COTS or Serious &amp; SIEs), game genres based on Peterson’s [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref10">10</xref>] system, game language, second language focus (four language skills and vocabulary), and device (PC, console, or mobile). CALL-informed parameters involved sample’s demographics (gender, age, second language and gaming proficiency). The following categories were used for samples’ age distribution: “6 - 7 years old”, “11 - 16 years old”, and “16+”. Second language proficiency was categorized according to “0” (no proficiency) “elementary/beginner”, “intermediate”, and “advanced” levels. Gaming proficiency categories</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> The screening process of papers</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-1760655x6.png"/></fig><p>included “gamers” (regularly played video games for over 3 years) and “non-gamers” (limited or no prior gaming experience). Additionally, seven articles [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref13">13</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref19">19</xref>] were included in a discussion section since they addressed some of the research questions such as gender and second language proficiency but they were excluded from the main list since they do not touch upon four language skills outcomes.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results</title><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Papers Identified by Search Terms</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref> shows the number of papers identified in each database using the specified search terms. The data demonstrates increased interest of scientific community in regards to the issues of second language learning through video games since 8361 papers were published during the last decade. However, only 26 publications met the inclusion criteria. The majority of papers were found in Google Scholar (42%), followed by ERIC (23%), Science Direct (23%), IEEE Xplore (8%), and SpringerLink (4%). The findings of these studies were summarized in Appendix A with respect to game type and title, second language and second language focus, sample data, method, instruments, outcomes, and researchers’ names.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>2</xref> shows the number of qualified papers split by the source of publication. Most of the articles were published in peer-reviewed journals (65%), followed by conference or symposium proceedings (31%), and government reports (4%).</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. Learner-Gamers Profile</title><sec id="s4_2_1"><title>4.2.1. Gender and Age</title><p>The results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>3</xref> disclosed that 5011 learners took part in the studies. For these studies, 46% of the participants were male, 37% were female, and the gender and/or age of the participants was unknown for the remaining 17%. The bulk of the research involved participants that were 11 - 15 years old (73%) whereas learners of 16+ years consisted of 26% of the sample and 6 - 7 year olds represented 1% of the sample.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2_2"><title>4.2.2. Second Language and Second Language Proficiency</title><p>The findings in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>4</xref> indicated that the majority of learners learned English (90%) as a second language (ESL) with less focus on Arabic (7%), German (2%), Japanese (0.4%), and Chinese (0.3%). Most of the learners (8%) had no prior knowledge of second language, followed by intermediate (3%), elementary or beginner (2%), and</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>1</xref></label><caption><title> Total number of papers identified in search and number of papers meeting inclusion criteria</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Database</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Total Number of Papers</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of Relevant Papers</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Google Scholar</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5140</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ERIC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SpringerLink</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >511</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Scopus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >IEEE Xplore</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >139</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Science Direct</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1037</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ProQuest Dissertations &amp; Theses</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1436</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8361</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>2</xref></label><caption><title> Total number of qualified papers split by publication source</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Source</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Title</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Number of Papers</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="14"  >Journals</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Educational Media International</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Language Learning &amp; Technology</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Asian Social Science</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Computers &amp; Education</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Interactive Learning Environments</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Foreign Language Annals</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CALICO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Speech Communication</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Interactive Technology &amp; Smart Education</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Computer Assisted Language Learning</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Journal of Computer Assisted Learning</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >The Reading Matrix</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >Conference/Symposium Proceedings</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ICEEPSY (2011)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >DIGITEL (2008; 2010)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Edutainment (2011)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >EUROGRAPHICS (2006)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ICFDG (2009)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ICCE (2012)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sandbox Symposium (2008)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Report No.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ED-04-CO-0036/0002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>3</xref></label><caption><title> Number of learners split by gender and age</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Gender</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Age</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Total</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 - 7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11 - 15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16+</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N/A<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Male</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2027</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >260</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2287</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Female</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1638</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >199</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1877</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N/A<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >843</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >847</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3665</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1302</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5011</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>a</sup>Information is not available.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>4</xref></label><caption><title> Number of learners split by second language and second language proficiency</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >L2</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >L2 Proficiency</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Total</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Elementary/Beginner</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Intermediate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Advanced</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N/A</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >English</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >125</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4258</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4471</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >German</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Arabic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >365</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >365</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Japanese</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chinese</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >405</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >145</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4287</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4970 (41<sup>a</sup>)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>a</sup>Number of native speakers involved.</p><p>advanced (0.9%) language proficiency participants. The proficiency level of 86% of the learners was not specified.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2_3"><title>4.2.3. Second Language Proficiency and Gaming Experience</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>5</xref> shows the number of learners split by their second language proficiency level and gaming experience. The results revealed little attention of the research community to the relationship between these variables since the gaming experience of the majority of the participants (98%) was not indicated. Nevertheless, 1.6% of learners considered themselves as gamers and 0.4% of the learners as non-gamers.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Video Games Profile</title><sec id="s4_3_1"><title>4.3.1. Language of Games</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>6</xref> shows that 24 video games were used in the studies. Among 24 games, 11 were COTS, 13 were serious games and SIEs, respectively. The 91% of the COTS games were in English, followed by Japanese (9%) language. Serious games and SIEs were developed for English (62%), German (15%), Japanese (8%), Arabic (8%), and Chinese (8%) languages acquisition. In addition, the most popular titles of COTS games used in the reviewed papers were Ever Quest II (MMORPG), The Sims (simulation), and Bone (adventure).</p></sec><sec id="s4_3_2"><title>4.3.2. Second Language Outcomes</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>7</xref> shows the number of COTS and serious games and SIEs split by genre and second language focus. The results indicate that the majority of COTS games were used for vocabulary enhancement (81%), with less focus on listening (55%), reading (45%), speaking (18%), and writing (18%). The serious games and SIEs were applied for vocabulary (54%), followed by listening (54%), speaking (38%), writing (23%), and reading (15%) skills acquisition.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3_3"><title>4.3.3. Device</title><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>8</xref> shows that the most popular device for delivery of COTS games was personal computer, PC (82%) and</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>5</xref></label><caption><title> Number of learners split by second language proficiency and gaming experience</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >L2 Proficiency</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Gaming Experience</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Total</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Non-Gamer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gamer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N/A</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >405</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >405</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Elementary/Beginner</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Intermadiate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >124</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >145</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Advanced</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N/A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4206</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4287</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4865</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4970 (41<sup>a</sup>)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>a. Number of native speakers involved.</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>6</xref></label><caption><title> Number of games split by type, genre, and second language</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Game Type</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Game Genre</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >L2</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Total</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >English</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >German</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Japanese</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Arabic</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chinese</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >COTS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMORPG</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Simulation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Adventure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >First Person Shooter</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sports</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rhythm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >Serious Games &amp; SIEs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Manipulation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Adventure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMORPG</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MUVEs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >VirtUAM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AHSs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ARGs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>7</xref></label><caption><title> Number of games split by game type, genre, and second language focus</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Game Type</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Game Genre</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >L2</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vocabulary</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Reading</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Writing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Listening</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Speaking</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >COTS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMORPG</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Simulation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Adventure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >First Person Shooter</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sports</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rhythm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >Serious Games &amp; SIEs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Manipulation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Adventure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMORPG</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MUVEs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >VirtUAM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AHSs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ARGs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8"><xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>8</xref></label><caption><title> Number of games split by game genre and device</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Game Type</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Game Genre</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Device</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Console</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mobile</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >COTS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMORPG</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Simulation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Adventure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >First Person Shooter</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sports</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rhythm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="7"  >Serious Games &amp; SIEs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Manipulation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Adventure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MMORPG</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MUVEs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >VirtUAM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AHSs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ARGs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>console (82%), followed by mobile devices (27%). The majority of serious games and SIEs can be delivered on personal computer (75%) and mobile devices (25%).</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Discussion of the Findings</title><p>The purpose of this section is to provide answers to the research questions addressed at the beginning of the paper by summarizing the findings.</p><sec id="s5_1"><title>5.1. Question 1: What Video Game Types and Genres Are More Accessible with Respect to Language Variety, Delivery, and Language Skills Practice?</title><p>In response to this question, literature suggests that in terms of second language variety, serious games and SIEs provide more options compared to COTS games. Since serious games and SIEs allow the targeting of specific educational objectives, theoretically, they can be developed in any language. Although some COTS games support several languages, the majority of them are usually in English or Japanese [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref13">13</xref>] . In such a way, there are more COTS games available to practice English and Japanese as second language, while serious games and SIEs are suitable for a wide variety of languages enhancement such as German, Arabic, and Chinese.</p><p>The synthesis of research identified that both COTS and serious games and SIEs provide opportunities for second language skills acquisition. However, while both types of games were used for reading, writing, listening, speaking skills, and vocabulary enhancement, serious games and SIEs were more introduced than COTS games in such areas of language acquisition as speaking and writing. In other words, serious games and SIEs offer more support for language skills development. Addressing the question of what types of games are more accessible with respect to delivery, literature suggests that COTS games, especially adventure games, offer more options since they can be played either on personal computer, console, and mobile devices or on all three devices. The vast majority of serious games and SIEs can be played on a personal computer only. Thus, both COTS and serious games and SIEs provide opportunities for second language enhancement in terms of language variety, delivery, and language skills practice but specific language objectives and technology availability should determine the type of game, which may better suit the needs of teachers and learners.</p></sec><sec id="s5_2"><title>5.2. Question 2: Is There a Relationship between Participants’ Age, Gender, Language Proficiency, Gaming Experience and Video Games Language Outcomes?</title><p>In response to the question, the synthesis found some evidence of the relationship between age, gender, and language outcomes. With respect to the relationship between age and video games outcomes, this synthesis uncovered that reviewed studies did not consider this variable at all. However, the findings of a meta-analysis conducted by Wouters, Van Nimwegen, Van Oostendorp and Van Der Spek [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref20">20</xref>] revealed that learning through video games is more effective for children than adults. It is noteworthy, only 58% of analyzed studies provided information on both participants’ gender and age. Since age variable may affect learning outcomes, this question requires closest attention.</p><p>In reference to the relationship between gender and video games language outcomes, research suggests that male participants usually play video games more than female, which may facilitate better vocabulary acquisition for males than females [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref16">16</xref>] . Literature also identified that male and female learners prefer different game genres. Males enjoy first-person shooter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref21">21</xref>] , MMORPGs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref19">19</xref>] and adventure games [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref22">22</xref>] , while females prefer offline single-player simulation games [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref16">16</xref>] . This may also result in better vocabulary performance of males than females [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref23">23</xref>] . To the contrary, Hitosugi, Schmidt and Hayashi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref22">22</xref>] found no gender effect on vocabulary outcomes regardless of the fact that female participants did not like adventure game. In such a way, even though, the findings revealed some relationship between gender, age and video games outcomes, there is not enough evidence of true relationship between these variables due to a limited number of studies, which also yielded conflicting results.</p><p>Some relationship can be also established between learners’ second language proficiency level and video games language outcomes. Findings in the research involving COTS games uncover that commercial games, particularly, MMORPGs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref24">24</xref>] , adventure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref26">26</xref>] , and rhythm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref27">27</xref>] may be challenging for the lower-level second language proficiency learners and inexperienced gamers because difficult game language, game missions, and game mechanics of these genres may cause cognitive overload. The findings also indicate that learners with elementary or beginner second language competency show little evidence of willingness to communicate in a target language [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref14">14</xref>] and are not able to significantly enhance vocabulary [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref24">24</xref>] through MMORPGs. By contrast, findings in the serious games and SIEs section suggest that learners with relatively low levels of second language proficiency may improve vocabulary [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref28">28</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref31">31</xref>] , listening [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref30">30</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref32">32</xref>] , writing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref30">30</xref>] , speaking [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref28">28</xref>] , and reading [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref32">32</xref>] skills. ESL learners with a higher level of proficiency also may improve their academic writing skills [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref33">33</xref>] and vocabulary [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref22">22</xref>] but not significantly enhance listening and reading [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref32">32</xref>] . In such a way, COTS games may be challenging for second language learners with lower-language proficiency, while serious games and SIEs may facilitate better language outcomes for them. Thus, there is some evidence of the relationship between second language proficiency and video games language outcomes; however, the lack of studies focusing on this issue as well as the lack of information on participants’ demographics leave the question inconclusive.</p><p>In regards to the question whether there is a relationship between gaming experience and video games language outcomes, findings reveal little attention to this issue since only 15% of the reviewed studies provide information on learners’ gaming experience. At the same time, literature suggests that novice players may experience cognitive overload [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref19">19</xref>] ; therefore, they usually need more time to get accustomed to the game’s mechanics. Consequently, this can decrease the students’ ability to communicate in a target language [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref15">15</xref>] during playing. In addition, unexperienced gamers with advanced second language proficiency may limit the participation in gaming sessions because of unfamiliarity with the game mechanics and in-game language. Meanwhile, experienced gamers with a high-beginner second language proficiency that act as mentors for less experienced players may improve their communicative competence [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref17">17</xref>] . In such a way, there is some evidence of the relationship between gaming experience and language outcomes but these findings should be treated with caution since only few studies discussed this question.</p></sec><sec id="s5_3"><title>5.3. Question 3: What Video Game Types Have Greater Potential for Second Language Skills and Vocabulary Acquisition?</title><p>In response to this question, the research suggests that both types of games are promising in terms of second language skills and vocabulary acquisition. In spite of the challenges with the game mechanics the majority of the ESL learners are able to succeed in vocabulary learning through MMORPG [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref35">35</xref>] , simulation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref36">36</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref38">38</xref>] , and adventure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref39">39</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref41">41</xref>] games. At the same time, synthesis revealed that vocabulary of MMORPGs, sports, first-person-shooter, and strategy games is limited by specific terminology such as sports, military, history, and geography [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref21">21</xref>] ; therefore, these game genres may suit better for specific lexicon learning. To the contrary, simulation games such as The Sims are helpful for the expanding the 2000 most frequent English words list [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref36">36</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref38">38</xref>] . In addition, although COTS facilitate vocabulary acquisition, there is not enough evidence that gaming is better than traditional classroom instructions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref34">34</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref35">35</xref>] . Some learners may still prefer conventional drill-and-practice approach [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref37">37</xref>] .</p><p>Furthermore, findings disclose that different game genres may differently affect language skills outcomes. Sports and adventure games are found to be helpful for learners’ listening and reading comprehension [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref25">25</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref40">40</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref42">42</xref>] but less effective for writing and speaking [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref40">40</xref>] . First-person shooter games [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref21">21</xref>] show little evidence of listening comprehension improvements and rhythm games [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref27">27</xref>] are less effective for vocabulary acquisition. In such a way, COTS games offer a variety of opportunities to enhance certain language skills, primarily, vocabulary but they may better suit the needs of more advanced second language learners who would like to practice language skills and interact with people who share common interests beyond the classroom.</p><p>Similarly to COTS, serious games and SIEs may be also challenging for learners since this type of games may contain difficult vocabulary [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref22">22</xref>] , require immediate response and more advance game mechanics skills [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref43">43</xref>] ; therefore, more scaffolding is necessary [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref44">44</xref>] . At the same time, MUVEs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref28">28</xref>] , VirtUAM [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref30">30</xref>] , AHSs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref29">29</xref>] , manipulation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref31">31</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref43">43</xref>] , and adventure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref44">44</xref>] games are found beneficial for vocabulary acquisition; manipulation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref33">33</xref>] and VirtUAM [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref30">30</xref>] for writing; and MMORPG for listening, reading, and writing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref45">45</xref>] . Similarly to COTS, different types of serious games and SIEs may also differently influence the language outcomes. For instance, ubiquitous games or ARGs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref46">46</xref>] and MUVEs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref28">28</xref>] may increase gains in speaking and listening comprehension while MMORPG and adventure show little evidence of speaking [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref45">45</xref>] and listening [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref32">32</xref>] improvement. In addition, some of the participants may have less confidence in serious video gaming approach for second language acquisition in comparison to traditional classroom activities [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref44">44</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref46">46</xref>] . In such a way, depending on the educational objectives the use of one or the other game genre may result in better language outcomes.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusion and Recommendations</title><p>As in the previous reviews [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.61032-ref11">11</xref>] this synthesis found lack of high-quality studies on video games implications for second language acquisition. Although 26 studies involving over 5,000 participants qualified for inclusion in terms of four language skills and vocabulary outcomes, 50% of the studies involved a small number of participants. The bulk of the research also did not provide information on participants’ gender and exact age (42%), second language proficiency level (50%), and gaming experience (85%). Only 12 studies had experimental design.</p><p>Keeping this limitations in mind, there are several noteworthy points. First, generally, both COTS and serious games and SIEs have positive effects on learning outcomes, especially vocabulary. However, the effectiveness of one game type or genre may depend on learners’ gender, second language proficiency, gaming, experience, and educational objectives, for example, language learning beyond the classroom. Second, traditional drill-and- practice may be more effective for vocabulary consolidation than COTS games. Finally, some learners may still prefer conventional instructions; therefore, learners’ personal preferences and learning styles should be taken into consideration.</p><p>In such a way, more high-quality studies focusing on the relationship between age, gender, second language proficiency, gaming experience, and video games outcomes and more empirical evidence, are clearly needed. In addition, research in the field of second language acquisition through video games should focus more on game design features that facilitate second language skills enhancement. The findings of this review add to the growing body of evidence to the effects of video games for second language skills and vocabulary acquisition providing a number of key points that could be used to enrich second language learners’ experience.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>7. Limitations</title><p>The present synthesis is limited by the publication period of the articles, the search terms used, inclusion criteria, and a relatively small number of papers (26) included in the review. Due to the limited scope of the current paper, theoretical rationales of the studies and studies limitations are not discussed here as well. The biases associated with the articles selected and coded by a single researcher should also be taken into account since they may affect reliability of the synthesis.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>AnastassiyaYudintseva, (2015) Synthesis of Research on Video Games for the Four Second Language Skills and Vocabulary Practice. Open Journal of Social Sciences,03,81-98. doi: 10.4236/jss.2015.311011</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Appendix A. Summary <xref ref-type="table" rid="table">Table </xref>of COTS and Serious Games and SIEs Findings</title><p><sup>a</sup>M = male; F = female; L2P = second language proficiency; GP = gaming proficiency.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.61032-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Graetz, J.M. (1981) The Origin of Spacewar. Creative Computing, 18. http://gillesboulet.ca/textes/spacewar.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McGonigal, J. (2012) Jane McGonigal: The Game that Can Give You 10 Extra Years of Life.  
https://www.ted.com/talks/jane_mcgonigal_the_game_that_can_give_you_10_extra_years_of_life?language=en</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Connolly, T.M., Boyle, E.A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T. and Boyle, J.M. (2012) A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Evidence on Computer Games and Serious Games. Computers &amp; Education, 59, 661-686.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gee, J.P. (2007) Good Video Games and Good Learning: Collected Essays on Video Games, Learning and Literacy. Peter Lang, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gee, J.P. (2015) Unified Discourse Analysis: Language, Reality, Virtual Worlds and Video Games. Routledge, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">De Aguilera, M. and Mendiz, A. (2003) Video Games and Education: Education in the Face of a “Parallel School”. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 1, 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/950566.950583</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gee, J.P. (2005) Learning by Design: Good Video Games as Learning Machines. E-Learning and Digital Media, 2, 5-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/elea.2005.2.1.5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cornillie, F., Thorne, S.L. and Desmet, P. (2012) ReCALL Special Issue: Digital Games for Language Learning: Challenges and Opportunities. ReCALL, 24, 243-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0958344012000134</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sykes, J.M., Oskoz, A. and Thorne, S.L. (2013) Web 2.0, Synthetic Immersive Environments, and Mobile Resources for Language Education. Calico Journal, 25, 528-546.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Peterson, M. (2013) Computer Games and Language Learning. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137005175</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Reinhardt, J. (2013) A Meta-Analysis of Research Frameworks in Digital Games and L2 Teaching and Learning.  
https://www.academia.edu/3597808</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hinkel, E. (2006) Current Perspectives on Teaching the Four Skills. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 109-131.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/40264513</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chik</surname><given-names> A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2011</year>)<article-title>Learner Autonomy Development through Digital Gameplay</article-title><source> Digital Culture &amp; Education</source><volume> 3</volume>,<fpage> 30</fpage>-<lpage>45</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Reinders, H. and Wattana, S. (2011) Learn English or Die: The Effects of Digital Games on Interaction and Willingness to Communicate in a Foreign Language. Digital Culture &amp; Education, 3, 3-29.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Reinders, H. and Wattana, S. (2015) Affect and Willingness to Communicate in Digital Game-Based Learning. ReCALL, 27, 38-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000226</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sylvén, L.K. and Sundqvist, P. (2012) Gaming as Extramural English L2 Learning and L2 Proficiency among Young Learners. ReCALL, 24, 302-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S095834401200016X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rama, P.S., Black, R.W., van Es, E. and Warschauer, M. (2012) Affordances for Second Language Learning in World of Warcraft. ReCALL, 24, 322-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0958344012000171</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ryu, D. (2013) Play to Learn, Learn to Play: Language Learning through Gaming Culture. ReCALL, 25, 286-301.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0958344013000050</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wu, M.L., Richards, K. and Saw, G.K. (2014) Examining a Massive Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Game as a Digital Game-Based Learning Platform. Computers in the Schools, 31, 65-83.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2013.878975</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wouters, P., Van Nimwegen, C., Van Oostendorp, H. and Van Der Spek, E.D. (2013) A Meta-Analysis of the Cognitive and Motivational Effects of Serious Games. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 249-265.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0031311</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anderson, T., Reynolds, B.L., Yeh, X.P. and Huang, G.Z. (2008) Video Games in the English as a Foreign Language Classroom. Proceedings of 2nd IEEE International Conference DIGITEL, Banff, 17-19 November 2008, 188-192.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/digitel.2008.39</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hitosugi, C.I., Schmidt, M. and Hayashi, K. (2014) Digital Game-Based Learning (DGBL) in the L2 Classroom: The Impact of the UN’s Off-the-Shelf Videogame, Food Force, on Learner Affect and Vocabulary Retention. CALICO Journal, 31, 19-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.11139/cj.31.1.19-39</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vahdat, S. and Behbahani, A.R. (2013) The Effect of Video Games on Iranian EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Learning. Reading, 13, 61-71. http://www.readingmatrix.com</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rankin, Y., Gold, R. and Gooch, B. (2006) 3D Role-Playing Games as Language Learning Tools. Proceedings of EuroGraphics, Vienna, 4-8 September 2006, The Eurographics Association, Oxford, 33-38.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, H.J. and Huang, W.C. (2010) Examining the Potentials of Computer Games for English Learning. Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Digital Game and Intelligent Toy Enhanced Learning (DIGITEL), Kaohsiung, 12-16 April 2010, 134-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/DIGITEL.2010.35</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, H.H.J. and Yang, C. (2011) Investigating the Effects of an Adventure Video Game on Foreign Language Learning. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on E-learning and Games, Edutainment 2011, Taipei, 7-9 September 2011, 168-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23456-9_31</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DeHaan, J.W., Reed, W.M. and Kuwada, K. (2010) The Effect of Interactivity with a Music Video Game on Second Language Vocabulary Recall. Language Learning &amp; Technology, 14, 74-94.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Johnson</surname><given-names> W.L. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2010</year>)<article-title>Serious Use of a Serious Game for Language Learning</article-title><source> International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education</source><volume> 20</volume>,<fpage> 175</fpage>-<lpage>195</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aghlara, L. and Tamjid, N.H. (2011) The Effect of Digital Games on Iranian Children’s Vocabulary Retention in Foreign Language Acquisition. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 552-560.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.275</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Berns, A., Gonzalez-Pardo, A. and Camacho, D. (2013) Game-Like Language Learning in 3-D Virtual Environments. Computers &amp; Education, 60, 210-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McGraw, I., Yoshimoto, B. and Seneff, S. (2009) Speech-Enabled Card Games for Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition in a Foreign Language. Speech Communication, 51, 1006-1023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2009.04.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Green, P.J., Sha, M. and Liu, L. (2011) The US-China E-Language Project: A Study of a Gaming Approach to English Language Learning for Middle School Students. RTI International, Research Triangle Park.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Allen, L.K., Crossley, S.A., Snow, E.L. and McNamara, D.S. (2014) L2 Writing Practice: Game Enjoyment as a Key to Engagement. Announcements &amp; Call for Papers, 124.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rankin, Y.A., McNeal, M., Shute, M.W. and Gooch, B. (2008) User Centered Game Design: Evaluating Massive Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games for Second Language Acquisition. Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Videogames, Los Angeles, 9-10 August 2008, 43-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1401843.1401851</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rankin, Y., Morrison, D., McKenzie, M.C., Gooch, B. and Shute, M. (2009) Time Will Tell: In Game Social Interactions that Facilitate Second Language Acquisition. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games, ACM, New York, 161-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1536513.1536546</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Miller, M. and Hegelheimer, V. (2006) The SIMs Meet ESL Incorporating Authentic Computer Simulation Games into the Language Classroom. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 3, 311-328.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17415650680000070</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ranalli, J. (2008) Learning English with the Sims: Exploiting Authentic Computer Simulation Games for L2 Learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21, 441-455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588220802447859</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bakar, N.A. and Nosratirad, E. (2013) Sustaining Vocabulary Acquisition through Computer Game: A Case Study. Asian Social Science, 9, 235-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n5p235</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, H.J.H. and Yang, T.Y.C. (2013) The Impact of Adventure Video Games on Foreign Language Learning and the Perceptions of Learners. Interactive Learning Environments, 21, 129-141.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.705851</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yang, C.T.Y. and Chen, H.H.J. (2012) Learners’ Perceptions of a Commercial Adventure Video Game for Learning English as a Second/Foreign Language. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computers in Education ICCE, Singapore, 26-30 November 2012, 529-536.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shahriarpour, N. and Kafi, Z. (2014) On the Effect of Playing Digital Games on Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners’ Motivation toward Learning English Vocabularies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1738-1743.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.601</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">DeHaan, J.W. (2005) Acquisition of Japanese as a Foreign Language through a Baseball Video Game. Foreign Language Annals, 38, 278-282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2005.tb02492.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yip, F.W. and Kwan, A.C. (2006) Online Vocabulary Games as a Tool for Teaching and Learning English Vocabulary. Educational Media International, 43, 233-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09523980600641445</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Neville, D.O., Shelton, B.E. and McInnis, B. (2009) Cybertext Redux: Using Digital Game-Based Learning to Teach L2 Vocabulary, Reading, and Culture. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22, 409-424.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588220903345168</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Suh, S., Kim, S.W. and Kim, N.J. (2010) Effectiveness of MMORPG-Based Instruction in Elementary English Education in Korea. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 370-378.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00353.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.61032-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, T.Y. and Chu, Y.L. (2010) Using Ubiquitous Games in an English Listening and Speaking Course: Impact on Learning Outcomes and Motivation. Computers &amp; Education, 55, 630-643.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.023</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>