<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJO</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Orthopedics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2164-3008</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojo.2015.510044</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJO-60573</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Children Flat Foot and Lower Limb Rotational Profile: A Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>emni</surname><given-names>Sonia</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lazreg</surname><given-names>Nadia</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Abid</surname><given-names>Manel</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Frioui</surname><given-names>Samia</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ben</surname><given-names>Rejeb Mohamed</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Osman</surname><given-names>Walid</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zaoui</surname><given-names>Afif</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Khachnaoui</surname><given-names>Faycel</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Orthopedic Department, Sahloul Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Community and Preventive Medicine Department, Sahloul Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Sahloul Hospital, Sousse, Tunisia</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>High School of Sciences and Technology of Health of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>09</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>326</fpage><lpage>335</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>17</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>23</month>	<year>October</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>26</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Flat foot in children is a common deformation, which appears during the first years of life. It requires a rigorous evaluation to rule out congenital or neurological abnormality. It is characterized 
  by a decrease of the plantar concavity indeed collapse of the foot, often associated with other morphostatic deformations. The aim of this study is to find a correlation between the essential flat foot in children and lower limb disorders torsional. It is a cross-sectional descriptive study, recruiting 110 children (220 feet) aged between 3 and 6 years old. Each child was given an assessment of the morphology of the foot (Contact Index II…) and lower limb rotational profile (intoeing and femoral 
  ant&#233;torsion and tibal torsion). Among 110 children, 21 (19.1%) have bilateral flat feet and 7 (6.4%) have unilateral flat feet, associated with an average value of Contact Index II equal to 0.921; the minimum value is 0.880 and the maximum value is 1.17. All children with flat feet have excessive femoral ant&#233;torsion; 45 (92%) are associated with a hip intoeing and 38 (80%) present an insuffi
  cient external tibial torsion. The analysis of multiple regression shows a significantly elevated correlation among the flat foot and excessive internal rotation of the hip (F = 70.36, r = 0.77, P &lt; 0.001), excessive femoral antetorsion (F = 54.78, r = 0.73, P &lt; 0.001) and insufficient external tibial torsion (F = 7.79, r = 0.37, P &lt; 0.001).
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Children</kwd><kwd> Essential Flat Foot</kwd><kwd> Femoral Ant&#233;torsion</kwd><kwd> Internal Rotation of the Hip</kwd><kwd> Tibial Torsion</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Child’s flat foot is considered among the most common reasons for pediatric pathology’s consultation, often associated with urgent request for treatment. It is a common structural deformation in the pediatric population which appears during the first years of life, but persists in only 3% of adult population [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref1">1</xref>] . It is characterized by a decrease of the plantar concavity indeed collapse of the foot, often associated with other morphostatic deformations (rearfoot valgus and forefoot abductus) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref1">1</xref>] . Starting from the idea that the valgus flat foot deformities are very common in children with cerebral palsy, which are strongly associated with excessive femoral antetorsion and excessive tibial external rotation, we pose the hypothesis that there is a correlation between the essential flat foot apart from cerebral palsy and torsional abnormalities of the lower limbs. Thus, we aim to highlight a possible relationship among these abnormalities in order to impact and modify the management methods of flat foot.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods:</title><p>It is a prospective, cross-sectional descriptive study based on the quantifiable-qualitative approach, conducted among children in primary schools and kindergartens in Sousse, Tunisia (from January to May 2015). For this study, we used a small sample of convenience to mark the initial stages of establishing a normative database of the correlation between the essential foot flat in children and lower limbs twist disorder. We paid special attention to select children from all social backgrounds and to determine a representative sample. Thus the sample of our study involved children split between public and private schools, primary and kindergartens in Sousse. It aims to establish an eventual correlation between the essential flat foot and torsional disorders in children. One hundred and ten children (71 boys and 39 girls) aged between 3 and 6 years (average 4.5) were examined. Teachers and parents have been fully informed about the project beforehand. A demonstration of the test to parents, teachers and children was given. Inclusion criteria are: age between 3 and 6 years and presentation of essential valgus flat foot (soft, collapsible, painless and without functional impairment). Children excluded from this study were those with secondary flat foot (congenital deformities, surgical overcorrection of varus clubfoot, collagen diseases, short Achilles tendon, polimyelities, cerebral palsy, muscular dystrophy, spina bifida, Charcot foot, painful flat foot, and traumatic injuries).</p><p>The study involved aspecific pediatric examination including demographic data, balance sheets and tests assessing static disorders of the foot and lower limb.</p><p>The pediatric examination included: a review of the plantar skin, the study of mobility and joint laxity of the foot and ankle (metatarsophalangeal and interphalangeal joints, Lisfranc joint, Chopart joint, subtalar joint, ankle joint in dorsiflexion and plantar flexion) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref3">3</xref>] . The examination of the hip included the evaluation of intoeing and external rotation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) and the femoral antetorsion (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>), performed in two steps to ensure muscle relaxation via aspecific Plexiglas goniometerreferring to Zafiropoulos [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref4">4</xref>] . It is considered excessive if itis greater than orequal to 30˚. We made a comparison between the angles of right and left femoral antetorsion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref5">5</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref7">7</xref>] . The knee’s rotary balance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref9">9</xref>] was measured with a goniometer to assess the tibial torsion (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p><p>Measuring the torsion of the tibialis skeleton [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref11">11</xref>] was performed with a goniometer in the prone position, knee flexed to 90˚ and rearfoot focused, from the angle formed between a line passing through the second metatarsal to the mid-heel and the axis of the femur (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). A tibial torsion is insufficient if it is less than or equal to 10˚. The excessive external tibial torsion is defined by an angle greater than or equal to 50˚.</p><p>A neurological examination was performed routinely in all children [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref13">13</xref>] including: assessing voluntary motor rating according to Medical Research Council and the tone, the study of tendon reflexes, plantar reflex</p><fig-group id="fig1"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Measure of hip rotation with pelvic stabilization.</title></caption><fig id ="fig1_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2010331x5.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig-group id="fig2"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Measure of femoral ant&#233;torsion, while controlling the greater trochanter in the sagittal plane.</title></caption><fig id ="fig2_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2010331x6.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig-group id="fig3"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> In supine position, measure of external rotation of the knee.</title></caption><fig id ="fig3_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2010331x7.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> In supine position, external tibial torsion measurement</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2010331x8.png"/></fig><p>and study of the sensory system. The evaluation of flat foot was performed in charge and in discharge. Two footprints left and right were taken via a podograph to get a permanent image of the plantar surface of the foot. Contact Index II is a clinical parameter measured from a footprint to assess the morphology of the flat foot. A flat foot deformity is defined by a Contact Index II greater than or equal to 0.88. To measure it, we plotted two straight lines AB and CD which are tangent to the outer and inner part of the impression. The axis of the foot XY connects the middle of the second metatarsal head to the heel. The line KP perpendicular and passing through the center of XY crosses the footprint in two points N and O. Contact Index II is calculated using the formula NO/KP ratio [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref14">14</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref16">16</xref>] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). The medial collapse, characterizing flat foot in children, was mentioned [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>The flat foot deformities were searched such as a valgus deviation of the rearfoot [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref12">12</xref>] (normal: 5, excessive valgus &gt; 5˚, varus &lt; 5˚), forefoot adductus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref17">17</xref>] as classified by Bleck and forefoot abductus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref18">18</xref>] . Reducibility of flat foot was evaluated in discharge [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref19">19</xref>] (in the prone position, feet dangling in the void, a flat foot is said to be reduced, if there is a total or partial disappearance of the collapse of the arch of the foot and the valgus of the rearfoot, on the tiptoe walking [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref3">3</xref>] (reducible if the foot goes into inversion (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>)), Hintermann Test [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref3">3</xref>] which reduces the valgus of the rearfoot (in a standing position, an external rotation of the leg is applied searching for a correction of the forefoot’s supination) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). Then, the Jack Test [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref3">3</xref>] , which assesses the excavation of the middle column of the foot and the calcaneal valgus correction (passive dorsiflexion of the hallux (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref>)).</p><p>Child’s feet orientation when walking, which can be internal or external (physiological) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref20">20</xref>] and the frontal morphotype of the knees in charge (normal, genu-valgum or genu-varum) have been clarified.</p><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Measuring contact Index II calculated using the formula NO/KP ratio</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2010331x9.png"/></fig><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Tiptoe test: disappearance of the collapse of the arch of the foot and the valgus of the rearfoot</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2010331x10.png"/></fig><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> Hintermann test: reducing the valgus of the rearfoot in a standing position, an external rotation of the leg is applied searching for a correction of the forefoot’s supination</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2010331x11.png"/></fig><fig id="fig8"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref></label><caption><title> Jack test: the passive dorsiflexion of the hallux brings up an excavation of the middle column of the foot and the correction of calcaneal valgus</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2010331x12.png"/></fig><p>Entering the given analysis was performed using the SPSS version 17 software. We used the student’s t-test, the chi2 test, correlation test, univariate linear regression analysis and multiple linear regression. Ethical considerations have been well defined and respected, with the commitment of the research student and responsibility.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>One hundred and ten children were included in this study with male predominance: 71 boys (represents 64.5%) and 39 girls (represents 35.5%). The sex ratio is 1.82.The age varies between 3 and 6 years (average: 4.5 years old).The most represented age group is that between 4 and 5 years (80%).</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Examination of the Foot and Lower Limb in Discharge</title><p>All children had a good quality of the foot pad and bilateral normal joint mobility of all joints of the foot. Comparing the mobility of the hips shows a significant difference (P &lt; 0.001) between the angles of inner and outer rotations of the hips to each side with larger internal rotations. No significant difference (P = 0.928) between the angles of right and left femoral antetorsion were identified. There is a significant difference between the internal and external rotation of the knee (P &lt; 0.001) for each of both sides. No significant differences (P = 0.103) between the external tibial torsion angles in right and left. The femoral antetorsion and tibial torsion are significantly related to each other (P &lt; 0.001) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Among the children examined, 87.3% (N = 96) have a normal-oriented knee, while 12.7% (N = 14) have a genu-valgum. The neurological examination is normal for all children.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Evaluation’s Parameters of Flat Foot</title><p>In our population, 49 feet are flat with an average value of Contact Index II equal to 0.921, the minimum value is 0.880 and the maximum value is 1.171. However, the others feet are considered normal with a Contact Index II average value was 0.615. The essential flat foot prevalence among our population (N = 110 children) was 25.5% (19.1% bilateral and 6.4% unilateral). The inner edge of the foot was not collapsed in the majority of cases (76.4% to 79.1% right and left). The average measurement of valgus angle for the rearfoot for our population is equal to 5.85˚ on the right and 5.86˚ on the left. Excessive valgus was observed in 50.45% of the feet. Among our population, 12.7% (N = 14) have asymmetrical adductus forefoot. Only 6 children have symmetrical adductus forefeet. All children with an essential flat foot had good reducibility of the deformity comparatively between the two feet, with a total disappearance of the collapse of the medial column, the calcaneal valgus and forefoot abductus in discharge and in dynamic. All flat feet were reducible according to the tipto, Hintermann and Jack tests.</p><p>In our study, 164 children (74.5%) have normal orientation of the walk while respecting the step angle, but 25.5% (N = 56) presents a feet oriented in internal rotation. We found a significant association between the femoral antetorsion and feet’s orientation when moving (p &lt; 0.001). Feet oriented in internal rotation are associated with an exaggerated femoral antetorsion in 92.9% of cases (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Exaggerated femoral antetorsion, excessive internal rotation of the hip and insufficient external tibial torsion were more frequent in the flat foot (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Statistical Analysis of the Correlation and the Regression</title><p>Statistical analyzes showed a significant correlation between the internal rotation of the hip and the value of Contact Index II with a Pearson coefficient equal to 0.774 (P &lt; 0.001). The regression analys is indicates that there is a significant relationship between these two parameters (F = 70.36, r = 0.77). The regression analys is indicates that there is a significant relationship between these two parameters (F = 54.78, r = 0.73).</p><p>We reported the existence of a significant negative correlation between the tibial torsion and flat foot with a Pearson coefficient (R) equal to 0.377 (P &lt; 0.001). The regression analys is indicates that there is a significant relationship between these two parameters (F = 7.79; r = 0.37).</p><p>The analysis of multiple regression between the internal rotation of the hip, femoral antetorsion, the tibial torsion and flat foot shows that all the conditions are met with a normal distribution of data. We verified that there is no collinearity between variables (FIV &lt; 3.3 and tolerance &gt; 0.3).</p><p>The regression equation is: Y = 0.667 + 0.39 IRH + 0.438 FAT ? 0.275 ETT</p><p>(Y: flat foot deformity, IR H: internal rotation of the hip, FAT: femoral antetorsion, ETT: insufficient external tibial torsion) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison between the angles of antetorsion femoral and tibial torsion (N = 220)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >FAT ETT</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >FAT exaggerated</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >FAT physiological</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Odds ratio</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >95% IC</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ETT insufficient</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38 (38%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >16 (13.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >[2.05 - 7.73]</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"   rowspan="2"  >&lt;0.001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ETT physiological</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62 (62%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >104 (86.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>FAT: femoral antetorsion; ETT: external tibial torsion; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison of femoral antetorsion angles depending on the orientation of the feet when walking</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >FAT FO</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >FAT exaggerated</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >FAT physiological</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Odds ratio</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >95% IC</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >With IR</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >52 (92.9%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 (7.1%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >[10.76 - 91.69]</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >P &lt; 0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Normal</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >48 (29.3%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >116 (70.7%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>FO: Foot Orientation; FAT: Femoral Antetorsion; IR: Internal Rotation of the feet; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Presentation of the results of statistic data, morphotype of the lower limbs in the frontal and horizontal plane depending on the type of the foot</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Morphotype LL type foot</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >FAT exaggerated</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >IR &gt; 60</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >TTE insufficient</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Genu-valgum</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Internal orientation foot</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Flat foot (49)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49 (100%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45 (91.8%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38 (77.6%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Normal foot (171)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51 (29.82%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47 (27.48%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16 (9.35%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28 (16.37%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56 (32.74%)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Morphotype LL: morphotype lower limbs; FAT: Femoral Antetorsion; ETT: external tibial torsion; IR: hip internal rotation.</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Analysis of multiple regression</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Non-standardized coefficient</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Standardized coefficient</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >t</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Significant</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Collinearity statistics</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Standard error</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Beta</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tolerance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >VIF</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Constant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.667</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.042</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.801</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >IRH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.390</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.236</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.418</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.394</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FAT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.005</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.438</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.729</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.440</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.274</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ETT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.275</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−3.370</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.910</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.099</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>IRH: internal rotation of the hip; FAT: femoral antetorsion; ETT: insufficient external tibial torsion; VIF: Variation Inflation Factor.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>During the early years of child development, parents are concerned about the perception of the shape of the lower limbs and disruption of walking that result. For a normal child, it’s an essential flat foot often reducible, flexible and does not cause functional impairment. It tends to improve during growth and persists to adulthood only in 1% to 2% of the population [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref21">21</xref>] . The rotation anomalies of the lower limbs can be femoral, tibial or mixed, resolved at an early age, are limited over time and improve gradually towards the age of 6 years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref22">22</xref>] .</p><p>Experimental evidence made by Arnold et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref23">23</xref>] , in 1997, on a three-dimensional computer model, showed that increase in femoral anteversion by 30˚ - 40˚ is associated with 40% - 50% decrease in the abduction moment arm of the gluteus medius, which becomes ineffective and results in impaired walking. Increased internal rotation of hip by 30˚ restored the abduction moment arm of the gluteus medius to 5% of the normal.</p><p>Increased internal rotation of hip is a compensatory mechanism to achieve the abduction moment arm needed for walking. It will develop a compensation mechanism at the tibial segment resulting in a tibial external untwisting.</p><p>The impact of lower limb torsion disorders in the foot remains unclear. However, excessive external tibial torsion is usually associated with flat foot and inversely for insufficient tibial torsion and a hollow foot [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref25">25</xref>] . The age average of our population is 4.5 years (80% between 4 - 5 years) with a male predominance (64.5% boys for 35.5% girls). To get away from the child’s flat foot deformity, we set the minimum age limit to 3 years, age indicated for a spontaneous recovery of the foot. The maximum age limit is fixed to 6 years old because it is considered the most suitable age to treat femoral antetorsion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref22">22</xref>] . This age group is comparable to that found in the study by Zafiropoulos in 2009 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>For our population, the evaluation of plantar imprints referring to the Contact Index II, allowed to identify a flat foot prevalence of around 25.5% (19.1% bilateral and 6 4% unilateral). Furthermore, in 2008, Zafiropoulos [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref4">4</xref>] studied the flat foot deformity in a population of 651 children (1302 feet), aged between 3 and 6 years (mean 4.5). He found that 16.7% (95) has a flat foot with a Contact Index II greater than or equal to 0.88 (mean 0.93).</p><p>The distribution of hip rotation in our population showed an asymmetry with a significant difference (P &lt; 0.001) between the inner and outer angles of rotation for both sides. The hip rotation sector lies mainly in internal rotation with an angle average of 55.72 degrees to the right (standard deviation = 11.7) and 55.64˚ to the left (standard deviation = 11.8).</p><p>These results are similar to research by Staheli [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref8">8</xref>] in 1993, which shows in his study that any asymmetry between the hip rotations with internal rotation sector increasing to benefit the external rotation indicates the existence of a hip disorder. Often, it is an excessive femoral antetorsion.</p><p>In our study, there is no significant difference (P = 0.928) between the angles of the right and left femoral antetorsion(right: angle average 27.45˚and standard deviation 6.4, left: angle average 27.44˚and standard deviation 6.5). 46.4% (51) of the children had an exaggerated antetorsion to the right and 44.5% (49) to the left.</p><p>According to Cahuac JP [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref7">7</xref>] , children who have femoral antetorsion greater than or equal to 30˚, have a preponderance of internal rotation compared to external rotation and normal external tibial torsion. The review shows a walk oriented inwards with a concordance of the knee with the axis of the feet. The exaggerated antetorsion mainly affects girls. It is often symmetrical with an inherited trait. It is among the most frequent twisting defects especially around age 5 or 6 years, since it represents 25% of torsional disorders.</p><p>During the growth, there is a decrease of the angle of femoral antetorsion associated with an increase of the external tibial torsion and only 4% to 10% will keep those defects of torsion at the end of the growth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>The passive rotation area of the knee in our population has an asymmetry of internal and external rotations and moves to external rotation (right: average 39.25˚ and standard deviation = 7.9; left: 39.02˚ and standard deviation = 7.4), with a significant difference between the two (P &lt; 0.001). The assessment of the tibial skeleton’s torsion must be associated with the measurement of the passive rotation of the knee. Indeed, external tibial torsion causes an increase in the external sector rotation in favor of internal rotation, and inversely for the internal tibial torsion. At the age of 6 or 7 years, the internal rotation sector gradually decreases and it is no longer associated with the tibial skeleton’s orientation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>In our study, we found a significant association (P &lt; 0.001) between the femoral antetorsion and external tibial torsion. At the study of Glard [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref26">26</xref>] , in 2012, performed about 1399 children, showed that the femoral antetorsion is negatively correlated to tibial skeleton’s torsion.</p><p>During our research, we noticed the existence of a medial collapse in all the examined flat feet. It is noted that 50.45% of the feet have excessive valgus, only 12.7% of children have a bilateral forefoot adductus and 5.5% present a bilateral abductus.</p><p>Some authors showed that the primitive flat foot is often characterized by the collapse of the internal plantar longitudinal arch in charge, which disappears at the discharge or at the tiptoe walking [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref27">27</xref>] . An accentuation of calcaneal valgus associated with the onset of a physiological genu-valgus occurs after the age of 2 years [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref28">28</xref>] .</p><p>Rushforth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref29">29</xref>] , in a prospective study of 166 children under 1 year old, has found that 179 feet had a reducible and untreated forefoot’s adduction. These children were reviewed between 3 and 11 years. He found a disappearance of the feet deformities in 58%, a slight distortion in 28%, a moderate deformity in 11% and a severe and fixed deformity in 4% of the children.</p><p>In our study the gait orientation’s assessment shows that 74.5% (164) of children have an external feet orientation and only 25.5% (56) have an intoeing gait. Our results show the existence of a significant association between the femoral antetorsion and the feet’s orientation while walking (P &lt; 0.001).</p><p>Zafiropoulos [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref4">4</xref>] studied the existence of a relationship between the hip intoeing and gait disturbance. Of 651 children examined, 72 had an intoeing gait with high angles of hips intoeing.</p><p>In our study 87.3% of the children examined have normal-oriented knees, 12.7% have a genu valgum. Researches made by Cahuzac et al. in 1995 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref30">30</xref>] and Accadbled et al. in 2007 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref25">25</xref>] show that changes in the rotational profile often leads to a change in the alignment of the lower extremities in the frontal plane during growth.</p><p>Angular deformities of the knees in the frontal plane is marked by the appearance of a genu varum from birth to the age of 2 years, then it turns into a valgus tibio-femoral from the third year, which is gradually improving during the growth towards puberty [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref31">31</xref>] .</p><p>In our study, the statistical results show two high significant positive correlations firstly between high internal hip rotation and Contact Index II, secondly between the exaggerated femoral antetorsion and Contact Index II. However, there is a significant negative correlation between the external tibial torsion and flat foot. That is means that the external tibial torsion default is correlated with the flat foot.</p><p>It was found that all children with flat foot have an exaggerated femoral antetorsion. Among 49 flat feet, 91.8% had high intoeing angles and 77.6% had an insufficient external tibial torsion.</p><p>Our results are similar to those found by Zafiropoulos [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref4">4</xref>] , he proves that there is a positive association between flat foot and excessive hip antetorsion. Indeed, all flat feet are correlated to excessive hip intoeing which indicates the existence of excessive femoral antetorsion.</p><p>In 1988, Bollini and Jacquemier [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.60573-ref32">32</xref>] showed that themorphology of the foot is relatively associated to the rotational profile of the lower member. They defined four clinical features:</p><p>・ An exaggerated femoral antetorsion with insufficient external tibial torsion are accompanied by a false flat valgus foot.</p><p>・ An exaggerated femoral antetorsion with exaggerated external tibial torsion are accompanied by a normal or a false hollow foot.</p><p>・ A low femoral antetorsion and insufficient tibial torsion are accompanied by anormal foot.</p><p>・ A low femoral antetorsion and exaggerated external tibial torsion are accompanied by a flat foot.</p><p>The small sample size and the geographical restrictions to Sousse region of Tunisia were represented as a two limitations in this study that decrease the validity of generalizing this normative data to the pediatric population with respect to the torsional changes of the lower extremity long bones and the morphofunctional characteristics of flat foot in children.</p><p>Further prospective research including children of age groups above 6 is recommended to establish the qualitative and quantitative progression of this relationship and highlight the future direction of management. In addition, it is suggested to involve a larger sample size and more diverse demographic region in order to increase the validity of making generalizations to the pediatric population.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The essential flat foot is a common benign disease in children. His spontaneous evolution tends towards the correction and improvement of various associated morphostatic disorders, such as the medial collapse, the accentuated calcaneus valgus and the fore foot abductus. The hypothesis of a possible association between the essential flat foot and torsional disorders of the lower limbs is a subject evoked by several authors. Our descriptive study was conducted on 110 children in primary schools and kindergartens in Sousse (Tunisia), aged between 3 and 6 years old. We found a prevalence of flat foot around 25.5% and a significant correlation between the essential flat foot and overlying rotational abnormalities. Indeed, we found a positive correlation between the exaggerated femoral antetorsion and flat foot on the one hand, and a positive correlation between the high hip intoeing and the flat foot on the other hand. However, we found a negative correlation between insufficient external tibial torsion and flat foot.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Conflict of Interest</title><p>No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. No funds were received in support of this study. The authors confirm that this article content has no conflicts of interest.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>JemniSonia,LazregNadia,AbidManel,FriouiSamia,Ben RejebMohamed,OsmanWalid,ZaouiAfif,KhachnaouiFaycel, (2015) Children Flat Foot and Lower Limb Rotational Profile: A Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study. Open Journal of Orthopedics,05,326-335. doi: 10.4236/ojo.2015.510044</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.60573-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khouri, N. (2008) Pied plat idiopathique de l’enfant et de l’adolescent. Conférence d’enseignement 2008. Cahier d’enseignement de la SOFCOT no 97. Elsevier, Paris, 197-205.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60573-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dalarque, A., Demortière, E., Collado, H., Mesure, S., Rubino, T. and Gonzalez, J.F. (2006) Bilan articulaire de la cheville et du pied chez l’adulte. EMC (Elsevier Masson SAS, Paris), Podologie. (27-010-A-25), 13 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60573-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Wicart, P. and Toullec, E. (2010) Pied plat valgus idiopathique. In: Seringe, R., Besse, J.-L. and Wicart, P., Eds., Les déformations du pied de l’enfant et de l’adulte (à l’exclusion de l’avant-pied). Cahiers d’enseignement de la SOFCOT, Elsevier Masson SAS, Paris, 3-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-2-84299-912-4.00027-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60573-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zafiropoulos, G., Pasad, K.S.R.K., Kouboura, T. and Danis, G. (2009) Flat Foot and Femoral Anteversion in Children—A Prospective Study. The Foot, 19, 50-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2008.09.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60573-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zeller, R. and Seringe, R. (1994) Troubles statiques des membres inférieurs. Journal de Pédiatrie et de Puériculture, 5, 72-77.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60573-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Caton, J., Neyret, P., Falise, C. and Ait Si Selmi, T. (1997) Anomalies de torsion du squelette au membre inférieur. Encycl. Med. Chir (Elsevier, Paris), Appareil locomoteur, 15-392-A, 10 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60573-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Cahuzac</surname><given-names> J.P. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2008</year>)<article-title>Vices de torsion des membres inférieurs</article-title><source> Société Francaise d’Orthopédie Pédiatrique (SOFOP)</source><volume> 3</volume>,<fpage> 395</fpage>-<lpage>397</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60573-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Staheli</surname><given-names> L.T. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1993</year>)<article-title>Rotational Problems in Children</article-title><source> Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American)</source><volume> 75</volume>,<fpage> 939</fpage>-<lpage>949</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60573-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Fenoll, B., Senab, C. and Cadilhac, C. (2001) Les “pieds qui tournent”. In: Moulies, D. and Tanguy, A., Eds., chirurgie et orthopédie du pied de l’enfant. Monographie du groupe d’étude en orthopedie pédiatrique, Sauramps medical, Montpellier, 349.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60573-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Taussig</surname><given-names> G. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1995</year>)<article-title>Les anomalies de rotation des membres inférieurs chez l’enfant</article-title><source> Journal de Pédiatrie et de Puériculture</source><volume> 6</volume>,<fpage> 131</fpage>-<lpage>136</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60573-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Viehwegera</surname><given-names> E.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Bérardb</surname><given-names> C.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Berruyerb</surname><given-names> A. and Simeonic</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> M.-C.</surname><given-names> Groupe Varax </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2007</year>)<article-title>Bilan articulaire des membres inférieurs d’un enfant atteint d’une infirmité motrice cérébrale</article-title><source> Annales de réadaptation et de médecine physique</source><volume> 50</volume>,<fpage> 258</fpage>-<lpage>265</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60573-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Goldcher, A. (2012) Podologie. 6 ères edition, Elsevier Masson SAS, Paris.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60573-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Denormandie, P., Lonjon, G. and Seringe, R. (2010) Testing musculaire du pied. In: Seringe, R., Besse, J.-L. and Wicart, P., Eds., Les grandes déformations du pied de l’enfant et de l’adulte (à l’exclusion de l’avant-pied), Elsevier Masson SAS, Paris, 41-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-2-84299-912-4.00014-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60573-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Didia, B.C., Omu, E.T. and Obuoforibo, A.A. (1987) The Use of Footprint Contact Index II for Classification of Flat Feet in a Nigerian Population. Foot &amp; Ankle International, 7, 285-289.http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107110078700700504</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60573-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Quamra, S.R., Deodhar, S.D. and Jit, I. (1980) Podographical and Metrical Study for Pes Planus in a Northwestern Indian Population. Human Biology, 52, 435-445.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60573-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Maes, R., Dojcinovic, S., Andrianne, Y. and Burny, F. (2006) Etude de la voute plantaire: Corrélations entre des paramètres podométriques et radiologiques. Revue Médicale de Bruxelles, 27, 429-422.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60573-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bleck, E.E. (1983) Metatarsus Adductus: Classification and Relationship to Outcomes of Treatment. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics, 3, 2-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01241398-198302000-00002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60573-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Toullec, E. (2012) Pied plat de l’adulte. EMC (Elsevier Masson SAS), Paris, Podologie (27-060-A-10).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60573-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Piat, A. (2000) Pied palt valgus. EMC (Elsevier Masson SAS), Paris, Podologie (27-060-A-10), 7 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60573-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Wicart, P. and Maestro, M. (2010) Examen clinique du pied. In: Seringe, R., Besse, J.L. and Wicart, P., Eds., Les déformations du pied de l’enfant et de l’adulte (à l’exclusion de l’avant-pied), Elsevier Masson SAS, Paris, 31-39.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-2-84299-912-4.00013-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60573-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Cigala, F. and Capuano, L. (2010) Histoire naturelle du pied plat valgus idiopathique. In: Diméglio, A., Ed., Le pied de l’enfant et de l’adolescent. Pathologie locomotrice et médecine orthopédique 36, Elsevier Masson SAS, Paris, 448.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60573-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Turek, S. (1984) Orthopaedics: Principles and Their Application. Lippincott, Philadelphia, 1236-1237.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60573-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arnold, A.S., Komattu, A.V. and Delp, S.L. (1997) Internal Rotation Gait: A Compensatory Mechanism to Restore Abduction Capacity Decreased by Bone Deformity? Developmental Medicine &amp; Child Neurology, 39, 40-44.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1997.tb08202.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60573-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lerat, I.L. and Taussing, G. (1982) Les anomalies de rotation des membres inférieurs. Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique, 68, 1-74.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60573-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Accadbled, F.M.C. and Cahuzac, J.P. (2007) Anomalies rotationnelles des membres inférieurs che l’enfant. EMC (Elsevier Masson SAS), Paris.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60573-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Glard, Y. (2012) Relation entre antétorsion fémorale et torsion tibiale chez l’enfant: à propos de 1399 cas. Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique, 98, S298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rcot.2012.08.061</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60573-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Harris, R.I. and Beath, T. (1948) Hypermobile Flat Foot with Short Tendo Achillis. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume, 30, 116-138.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60573-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tachdjian, M.O. (1990) Flexible pesplanevalgus. In: Pediatric Orthopaedics, 2nd Edition, Saunders, Philadelphia, 83-85.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60573-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rushforth, G.F. (1978) The Natural History of Hooked Forefeet. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, British Volume, 60, 530-532.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60573-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cahuzac, J.P., Vardon, D. and Sales de Gauzy, J. (1995) Development of the Clinical Tibiofemoral Angle in Normal Adolescents. A Study of 427 Normal Subjects from 10 to 16 Years of Age. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, British Volume, 77, 729-732.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60573-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tachdjian, M. (1990) Torsional (Or Rotational) Déformities of Lower Limb. WS &amp; Company Ltd., Scarborough, ON.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.60573-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bollini, G. and Jacquemier, M. (1988) Physiologie du développement des membres inférieurs et conséquences sur le pied. Chirurgie et Orthopédie du pied. Sauramps Medical.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>