We study the quantization of systems with local particle-ghost symmetries. The systems contain ordinary particles including gauge bosons and their counterparts obeying different statistics. The particle-ghost symmetries are new type of fermionic symmetries between ordinary particles and their ghost partners, different from the space-time supersymmetry and the BRST symmetry. There is a possibility that they are useful to explain phenomena of elementary particles at a more fundamental level, by extension of our systems. We show that our systems are formulated consistently or subsidiary conditions on states guarantee the unitarity of systems, as the first step towards the construction of a realistic fundamental theory.
Graded Lie algebras or Lie superalgebras have been frequently used to formulate theories and construct models in particle physics. Typical examples are supersymmetry (SUSY) [1] -[4] and BRST symmetry [5] - [7] .
The space-time SUSY [8] [9] is a symmetry between ordinary particles with integer spin and those with half- integer spin, and the generators called supercharges are space-time spinors that obey the anti-commutation relations [10] [11] .
The BRST symmetry is a symmetry concerning unphysical modes in gauge fields and abnormal fields called Faddeev-Popov ghost fields [12] . Though both gauge fields and abnormal fields contain negative norm states, theories become unitary on the physical subspace, thanks to the BRST invariance [13] [14] . The BRST and anti-BRST charges are anti-commuting space-time scalars.
Recently, models that contain both ordinary particles with a positive norm and their counterparts obeying different statistics have been constructed and those features have been studied [15] - [18] . Models have fermionic symmetries different from the space-time SUSY and the BRST symmetry. We refer to this type of novel symmetries as “particle-ghost symmetries”.
The particle-ghost symmetries have been introduced as global symmetries, but we do not need to restrict them to the global ones. Rather, it would be meaningful to examine systems with local particle-ghost symmetries from following reasons. It is known that any global continuous symmetries can be broken down by the effect of quantum gravity such as a wormhole [19] . Then, it is expected that a fundamental theory possesses local symmetries, and global continuous symmetries can appear as accidental ones in lower-energy scale. In the system with global particle-ghost symmetries, the unitarity holds by imposing subsidiary conditions on states by hand. In contrast, there is a possibility that the conditions are realized as remnants of local symmetries in a specific situation. Hence, it is interesting to investigate features of particle-ghost symmetries more closely and widely, and to apply them on a microscopic theory beyond the standard model.
In this paper, we study the quantization of systems with local particle-ghost symmetries. The systems contain ordinary particles including gauge bosons and their counterparts obeying different statistics. We show that our systems are formulated consistently or subsidiary conditions on states guarantee the unitarity of systems, as the first step towards the construction of a realistic fundamental theory. The conditions can be originated from constraints in case that gauge fields have no dynamical degrees of freedom.
The contents of this paper are as follows. We construct models with local fermionic symmetries in Section 2, and carry out the quantization of the system containing scalar and gauge fields in Section 3. Section 4 is devoted to conclusions and discussions on applications of particle-ghost symmetries. In the Appendix Section, we study the system that gauge fields are auxiliary ones.
2. Systems with Local Fermionic Symmetries2.1. Scalar Fields with Local Fermionic Symmetries
Recently, the system described by the following Lagrangian density has been studied [15] -[18] ,
where is an ordinary complex scalar field and is the fermionic counterpart obeying the anti-commu- tation relations. The system has a global symmetry that consists of U(1) and fermionic symmetries. The unitarity holds by imposing suitable subsidiary conditions relating the conserved charges on states.
Starting from (1), the model with the local symmetry is constructed by introducing gauge fields. The resultant Lagrangian density is given by
where and are the gauge fields relating the (diagonal) U(1) symmetries, and are gauge fields relating the fermionic symmetries, and g is the gauge coupling constant. The quantized fields of obey the anti-commutation relations.
The is invariant under the local U(1) transformations,
and the local fermionic transformations,
where and are infinitesimal real functions of x, and and are Grassmann-valued functions of x.
The and are simply written as
respectively. In, and are the covariant derivative and the doublet of fermionic transformation defined by
respectively. In, Str is the supertrace defined by where M is the 2 × 2 matrix given by
The is defined by
where, , and are the field strengths given by
Under the transformations (4)-(7), the field strengths are transformed as
Using the global fermionic transformations,
is rewritten as
where is given by
2.2. Spinor Fields with Local Fermionic Symmetries
For spinor fields, we consider the Lagrangian density,
where is an ordinary spinor field and is its bosonic counterpart obeying commutation relations. This system also has global U(1) and fermionic symmetries, and the unitarity holds by imposing suitable subsidiary conditions on states.
Starting from (24), the Lagrangian density with local symmetries is constructed as
where is given by (3), , and are the matrices satisfying. The is rewritten as
where and are the extension of -matrices and the doublet of fermionic transformation defined by
respectively.
The is invariant under the local U(1) transformations,
and the local fermionic transformations,
where and are infinitesimal real functions of x, and and are Grassmann-valued functions of x.
Using the global fermionic transformations,
is rewritten as
where is given by
3. Quantization
We carry out the quantization of the system with scalar and gauge fields described by.
3.1. Canonical Quantization
Based on the formulation with the property that the hermitian conjugate of canonical momentum for a variable is just the canonical momentum for the hermitian conjugate of the variable [16] , the conjugate momenta are given by
where, and R and L stand for the right-differentiation and the left-differentiation, respectively. From (40) and (41), we obtain the primary constraints,
Using the Legendre transformation, the Hamiltonian density is obtained as
where Roman indices i and j denote the spatial components and run from 1 to 3, , , and are Lagrange multipliers, and, , and are rewritten as, , and in the final expression.
Secondary constraints are obtained as follows,
where H is the Hamiltonian and is the Poisson bracket. The Poisson bracket for the
system with canonical variables and is defined by [16]
where is the number representing the Grassmann parity of, i.e., for the Grassmann odd and for the Grassmann even. There appear no other constraints, and all constraints are first class ones and generate local transformations.
We take the gauge fixing conditions,
The system is quantized by regarding variables as operators and imposing the following relations on the canonical pairs,
where, , and only the non-vanishing ones are denoted. Here, we define the Dirac bracket using the first class constraints and the gauge fixing conditions, and replace the bracket with the commutator or the anti-commutator.
On the reduced phase space, the conserved U(1) charges and and the conserved fermionic charges and are constructed as
The following algebraic relations hold:
The above charges are generators of global U(1) and fermionic transformations such that
where and are real parameters, and and are Grassmann parameters. Note that and
in (20) and (21) are related to and as,.
The system contains negative norm states originated from, and. In the presence of negative norm states, the probability interpretation cannot be endured. To formulate our model in a consistent manner, we use a feature that conserved charges can be, in general, set to be zero as subsidiary conditions. We impose the following subsidiary conditions on states by hand,
In the Appendix, we point out that subsidiary conditions corresponding to (62) can be realized as remnants of local symmetries in a specific case.
3.2. Unitarity
Let us study the unitarity of physical S matrix in our system, using the Lagrangian density of free fields,
where the gauge fixing conditions (49) are imposed on. The describes the behavior of asymptotic fields of Heisenberg operators in.
From (63), free field equations for, , , , , and are derived. By solving the Klein- Gordon equations, we obtain the solutions
where and.
In the same way, by solving the free Maxwell equations, we obtain the solutions,
where and are polarization vectors satisfying the relations,
The index represents the helicity of gauge fields.
By imposing the same type of relations as (50) - (55), we have the relations,
and others are zero.
The states in the Fock space are constructed by acting the creation operators, , ,
, , , and on the vacuum state, where is defined by the conditions, , , , , ,
.
We impose the following subsidiary conditions on states to select physical states,
Note that means. We find that all states, except for the vacuum state, are unphysical because they do not satisfy (85). This feature is understood as a counterpart of the quartet mechanism [13] [14] . The projection operator on the states with n particles is given by
where and we omit, for simplicity. Using the transformation properties,
is written in a simple form as
where is given by
From (88), we find that any state with is unphysical from. Then, we understand that every field becomes unphysical, and only remains as the physical state. This is also regarded as a field theoretical version of the Parisi-Sourlas mechanism [20] .
The system is also formulated using hermitian fermionic charges defined by and. They satisfy the relations, and. Though Q1, Q2 and form elements of the (quantum mechanical) SUSY algebra [21] , our system does not possess the space-time SUSY because is not our Hamiltonian but the U(1) charge. Only the vacuum state is selected as the physical states by imposing the following subsidiary conditions on states, in place of (85),
It is also understood that our fermionic symmetries are different from the space-time SUSY, from the fact that Q1 and Q2 are scalar charges. They are also different from the BRST symmetry, as seen from the algebraic relations among charges.
The system with spinor and gauge fields described by is also quantized, in a similar way. We find that the theory becomes harmless but empty leaving the vacuum state alone as the physical state, after imposing subsidiary conditions corresponding to (62).
3.3. BRST Symmetry
Our system has local symmetries, and it is quantized by the Faddeev-Popov (FP) method. In order to add the gauge fixing conditions to the Lagrangian, several fields corresponding to FP ghost and anti-ghost fields and auxiliary fields called Nakanishi-Lautrup (NL) fields are introduced. Then, the system is described on the extended phase space and has a global symmetry called the BRST symmetry. We present the gauge-fixed Lagrangian density and study the BRST transformation properties.
According to the usual procedure, the Lagrangian density containing the gauge fixing terms and FP ghost terms is constructed as
where, , and are FP ghosts, , , and are FP anti-ghosts, , , and are NL fields, and is a gauge parameter. These fields are scalar fields., , and are fermionic, and and are bosonic. In contrast, , , and are bosonic, and and are fermionic because the relevant symmetries are fermionic.
The is invariant under the BRST transformation,
where the transformations for, , , , , , and are obtained by regarding the sum of transformations as and replacing, , and with, , and, and those for, , and are determined by the requirement that has a nilpotency property, i.e.,.
The sum of the gauge fixing terms and FP ghost terms is simply written as
According to the Noether procedure, the BRST current and the BRST charge are obtained as
and
respectively. Here we use the field equations. The BRST charge is a conserved charge (), and it has the nilpotency property such as.
By imposing the following subsidiary condition on states,
it is shown that any negative norm states originated from time and longitudinal components of gauge fields as well as FP ghost and anti-ghost fields and NL fields do not appear on the physical subspace, through the quartet mechanism. There still exist negative norm states come from, and, and it is necessary to impose additional conditions corresponding to (62) on states in order to project out such harmful states.
4. Conclusions and Discussions
We have studied the quantization of systems with local particle-ghost symmetries. The systems contain ordinary particles including gauge bosons and their counterparts obeying different statistics. There exist negative norm states come from fermionic scalar fields (or bosonic spinor fields) and transverse components of fermionic gauge fields, even after reducing the phase space due to the first class constraints and the gauge fixing conditions or imposing the subsidiary condition concerning the BRST charge on states. By imposing additional subsidiary conditions on states, such negative norm states are projected out on the physical subspace and the unitarity of systems hold. The additional conditions can be originated from constraints in case that gauge fields have no dynamical degrees of freedom.
The systems considered are unrealistic if this goes on, because they are empty leaving the vacuum state alone as the physical state. Then, one might think that it is better not to get deeply involved them. Although they are still up in the air at present, there is a possibility that a formalism or concept itself is basically correct and is useful to explain phenomena of elementary particles at a more fundamental level. It is necessary to fully understand features of our particle-ghost symmetries, in order to appropriately apply them on a more microscopic system.
We make conjectures on some applications. We suppose that particle-ghost symmetries exist and the system contains only a few states including the vacuum as physical states at an ultimate level. Most physical particles might be released from unphysical doublets that consist of particles and their ghost partners. A release mechanism has been proposed based on the dimensional reduction by orbifolding [17] .
After the appearance of physical fields, -singlets and -doublets coexist with exact fermionic symmetries. The Lagrangian density is, in general, written in the form as. Here, , and stand for the Lagrangian density for QF-singlets, QF-doublets and interactions between QF-singlets and QF-doublets. Under the subsidiary conditions, , and on states, all -doublets become unphysical and would not give any physical effects on singlets. Because singlets would not receive any radiative corrections from QF doublets, the theory is free from the gauge hierarchy problem if all heavy fields form QF doublets [15] .
The system seems to be same as that described by alone, and to be impossible to show the existence of QF-doublets. However, in a very special case, an indirect proof would be possible through fingerprints left by symmetries in a fundamental theory. The fingerprints are specific relations among parameters such as a unification of coupling constants, reflecting on underlying symmetries [15] [22] .
In most cases, our ghost fields require non-local interactions [15] and the change of degrees of freedom can occur in systems with infinite numbers of fields [17] . Then, they might suggest that fundamental objects are not point particles but extended objects such as strings and membranes. Hence, it would be interesting to explore systems with particle-ghost symmetries and their applications in the framework of string theories1.
Acknowledgements
The author thanks the Editor and the referee for their comments. This work was supported in part by scientific grants from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology under Grant No. 22540272.
Cite this paper
YoshiharuKawamura, (2015) Local Particle-Ghost Symmetry. Journal of Modern Physics,06,1721-1736. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2015.612174
AppendixA1. System with Auxiliary Gauge Fields
Let us study the system without described by
In this case, gauge fields do not have any dynamical degrees of freedom, and are regarded as auxiliary fields. The conjugate momenta of, , and are same as those obtained in (36) - (39). The conjugate momenta of, , and become constraints,
Using the Legendre transformation, the Hamiltonian density is obtained as
where, , and are Lagrange multipliers.
Secondary constraints are obtained as
where is the Hamiltonian, and, , and are the currents of U(1) and fermionic symmetries given by
In the same way, tertiary constraints are obtained as
from the invariance under the time evolution of, , and. On the other hand,
the conditions, , and
are not new constraints but the relations to determine, , and. Fur-
thermore, new constraints do not appear from the conditions, , and.
The constraints are classified into the first class ones
and the second class ones
The determinant of Poisson bracket between second class ones does not vanish on constraints.
Using, , and, the conserved U(1) and fermionic charges are constructed as
The same algebraic relations hold as those in (60).
The above charges are conserved and generators of global U(1) and fermionic transformations for scalar fields. They satisfy the relations,
where are first class constraints (113) and the Hamiltonian. From (101) - (104) and (119), following relations can be considered as first class constraints,
After taking the following gauge fixing conditions for the first class ones (113),
the system is quantized by regarding variables as operators and imposing the same type of relations (50) and (51) on the canonical pairs. From (120), it is reasonable to impose the following subsidiary conditions on states,
Then, they guarantee the unitarity of our system, though it contains negative norm states originated from and.
NOTESReferencesNeveu, A. and Schwarz, J.H. (1971) Nuclear Physics B, 31, 86-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(71)90448-2Ramond, P. (1971) Physical Review D, 3, 2415-2418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.3.2415Aharonov, Y., Casher, A. and Susskind, L. (1971) Physics Letters B, 35, 512-514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(71)90386-8Gervais, J.L. and Sakita, B. (1971) Nuclear Physics B, 34, 632-639. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(71)90351-8Becchi, C., Rouet, A. and Stora, R. (1975) Communications in Mathematical Physics, 42, 127-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01614158Becchi, C., Rouet, A. and Stora, R. (1976) Annals of Physics, 98, 287-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(76)90156-1Tyutin, V. (1975) Gauge Invariance in Field Theory and Statistical Physics in Operator Formalism. Lebedev Physical Institute Report No.39, arXiv:0812.0580 [hep-th].Wess, J. and Zumino, B. (1974) Nuclear Physics B, 70, 39-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(74)90355-1Wess, J. and Bagger, J. (1991) Supersymmetry and Supergravity. 2nd Edition. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Salam, A. and Strathdee, J. (1975) Physical Review D, 11, 1521-1535. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.11.1521Haag, R., Lopuszański, J.T. and Sohnius, M. (1975) Nuclear Physics B, 88, 257-274.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(75)90279-5Faddeev, L.D. and Popov, N. (1967) Physics Letters B, 25, 29-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(67)90067-6Kugo, T. and Ojima, I. (1978) Physics Letters B, 73, 459-462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(78)90765-7Kugo, T. and Ojima, I. (1979) Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement, 66, 1-130.http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/PTPS.66.1Kawamura, Y. (2015) International Journal of Modern Physics A, 30, Article ID: 1550153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X15501535Kawamura, Y. (2014) Fermionic Scalar Field. http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.6155Kawamura, Y. (2015) International Journal of Modern Physics A, 30, Article ID: 1550056.http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X15500566Kawamura, Y. (2015) Quantization of Systems with OSp(2|2) Symmetry. http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.00751Giddings, S. and Strominger, A. (1988) Nuclear Physics B, 306, 890-907.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(88)90446-4Parisi, G. and Sourlas, N. (1979) Physical Review Letters, 43, 744-745. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.744Witten, E. (1982) Journal of Differential Geometry, 17, 661-692.Kawamura, Y. (2015) International Journal of Modern Physics A, 30, Article ID: 1550109.http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X15501092Okuda, T. and Takayanagi, T. (2006) Journal of High Energy Physics, 2006, 62.Terashima, S. (2006) Journal of High Energy Physics, 2006, 67.