It is by far the view which offers to the observation, invaluable block details in connection with arguments making it possible to go up the trajectory of the long flight of this block from space to Koussa. The regmaglytes that one sees there are giant, of inhabitual dimensions; three of these regmaglytes of sub-metric to metric size are prominent and seem to carve this Southern face of the metallic block; the largest and deepest of these regmaglytes is of 1.5 m in diametre for a depth beyond the metre. This deepest regmaglyte from this view is centrally situated on the metallic block. The second regmaglyte in the view disunites the “spinal columns” of the two “animals”; and the third and fourth regmaglytes are affecting the right “shoulders” of both “animals”. The metallic block is stretched on close to 6 m in its East-West orientation for a height of more than 3 m. These dimensions are actually the first or initial indications since the metallic block is deeply buried. The geophysics approach relating to the measurement of the resistivity’s values around the metallic block revealed its prolongation back towards the West on more than 3 m distance, and in depth. In spite of the rust marker of the time already passed at Koussa, traces of castings pointing out a fusion crust are still visible inside the receptacles which constitute these regmaglytes. A more or less deep central furrow braided in height seems to connect these regmaglytes the ones to the others.

This face is marked by the prevalence of the protuberance corresponding to the gigantic hollow of the major regmaglyte of the opposite face.

It is allowed or obtained from the western sight; this view offers to the observation, the heads of both “animals” vertically and horizontally shifted. The head ahead is lightly presented in profile because of its slight rotation towards the South.

The fusion crust and the central furrow give certainly an account of fluids dynamics in relation with the successive thermal states along the final incidental trajectory of this meteorite.

Native iron generally poses a problem; that of its origin or its source when found on the Earth surface. What is indicated as Itabirites or BIF is a set or a mixture between the crystals of magnetite and sand [7] [8] ; these sedimentary formations of old age (Precambrian) characterize from the paleogeographic consideration, a sufficiently dry climatic context so that evaporation exceeds the contributions by precipitations. Such a context points out that of the deserts such as one can observe them today on Earth, with their extreme scarcity of the rains. Iron saturates within the various ponds and other pools, and starts to precipitate at the bottom while mixing with sand.

Knowing that the sand dune is the major palaeogeographic marker of a desert, the debate on the possible presence of Itabirites in our country deserves to be opened: nowhere in the geographical sectors where these “Itabirites” in our country or elsewhere in the sub-region are announced, nobody still provided the least proof of

Plate I. (a) (b) Brecciated texture of a native iron block from Sangmelima revealed after the test acid; (c)-(g) Brecciated texture and Neumann figures from the “two camels” of Koussa confirming a meteoritic nature of the Hexaedrites class.

a presence of the fossil dunes having to validate a paleogeographic context of a desert. On the other hand the hydrographic networks of multiple and concentric rings layout in Cameroon for example, which reveal immense multi-rings basins such that of Dja or that of Great Mbam abounding in much water, the strong recurrence of breccias on the whole of the Gulf of Guinea area, all of these parameters being either geomorphological or lithological, characterize the impact craters and thus the phenomenon of meteoritic impact [4] - [6] , [9] - [16] . The meteoritic nature of the “two camels” in Mayo Binka and that of the block of native iron of Sangmélima revealed through the test with the acid fully confirm a phenomenon of meteoritic impact on a large scale in the Gulf of Guinea. The iron found in our country and elsewhere in the sub-region of Central Africa, is thus more meteoritic than sedimentary. And the emblematical “couple of the two camels” of Mayo Binka with its mass and size, is the concrete and undeniable proof of a powerful bombardment of our sub-region by metallic hyperveloce bolides coming from space; that is the mechanism of installation of all the iron ores in central Africa.

The stretched configuration of the meteorite of Mayo Binka along the East-West direction, gives him in space, a general morphology which is that of a triaxial ellipsoid directed along its major axis; this major axis is of 6 m length. The intermediate axis corresponds to the height of the meteorite either 3 m, and the minor axis coincides with the depth of the largest regmaglyte dug at the centre of the meteorite or 1.5 m. The densities of Siderites are about 8000 kg/m³; this is why Siderites constitute an iron of excellent quality because precisely of this significant density which they acquire while condensing under high pressures inside the heart of the parent body during its

differentiation. The volume of this ellipsoid is given by the relation: is 14 m³.

Having got value of volume and that of the density allows the precise determination of the mass either 113,097 kg or 113 tonnes! We point out here that the meteorite being deeply buried and being prolonged towards the West on more than 3 m of distance, the dimensions used for calculations carried out above because they refer only to the visible part of this meteorite, obviously represent only the first approach in this evaluation the mass of the “two camels” is largely beyond the 113 tonnes. 113 tonnes of mass corresponds for this first evaluation, close to the double of the mass of the meteorite of Hoba in Namibia, another Siderite of a mass of 60tonnes considered so far the largest meteorite in the world: the “two camels” of Koussa in Mayo Binka in Cameroon ( Plate II ), is consequently, the largest meteorite in the world.