Direct visual documentation of liver disease in its entirety, from aberrant architecture tocytopathology, made possibly through biopsy, is an invaluable tool in the clinical armamentarium of the hepatologist. This modality is currently in ubiquitous use for the diagnosis, staging, prognosis and management of a range of infectious, metabolic, autoimmune conditions as well as peri- and post-transplant surveillance. Although newer non-invasive- liver assessment modalities such as transient elastography and MR elastography are making their debut in clinical practice, such novelties are unlikely to replace completely liver biopsy as the gold standard, in the foreseeable future [1] . This invasive procedure is still the mainstay along with its associated hazards, affecting morbidity & mortality. Performance of outpatient percutaneous liver biopsies is drifting away from clinicians towards interventional radiologists for enhanced safety and reduced complications.

Transjugular liver biopsy as compared with percutaneous liver biopsy (PCLB) in an outpatient setting is by far a safer approach in patients with coagulopathies [2] -[4] . Von Willebrand’s disease (vWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder, affecting 1 - 3 percent of the global population [5] . There are no data published to date, on the safety of PCLB in patients with vWD.

The objective of our study was to evaluate the safety of PCLB in vWD. We performed a retrospective analysis of PCLBs for hemorrhagic complications (local hematoma, intraabdominal hemorrhage, hemorrhagic shock requiring hospitalization, blood transfusion requirements and surgical intervention). Outpatient PCLBs are generally regarded safe with a mortality rate of 0.17% and hospitalization rate for bleeding of 3% [6] [7] . However, there is paucity of published evidence on the risk of hemorrhage and the spectrum of hemorrhagic complications in patients with different types of vWD undergoing PCLB.

The objectives of our study were to determine the prevalence of vWD in patients undergoing liver biopsy as well as the safety of liver biopsy in these patients who had vWD.

A retrospective study of patients (n = 120) who underwent PCLB in an outpatient setting, as part of a community-based practice from 1997 to 2007, was performed following appropriate institutional board review and approval.

The following medications were withheld for at least 5 days pre-PCBL: anti-platelet drugs (ASA, clopidogrel or NSAIDs) or anti-coagulants (warfarin, unfractionated heparin, LMWH or Xa inhibitors) and subsequently resumed 48 hours post-PCBL when it was deemed clinically safe.

Specific patient populations known to confound the study results were excluded, such as those with:

・ Prior known coagulation diathesis (Hemophilia, factor VIII deficiencies)

・ Familial history of significant bleeding diathesis

・ AV malformations

・ Collagen vascular diseases

・ Congestive heart failure

・ Chronic kidney disease or those on dialysis

A single clinician used a uniform standard technique to carry out the PCBLs [8] . Patients were placed in supine position semi-reclined at 30 degrees and sonography was used to locate the optimal biopsy site [9] . Using an aseptic technique the skin, underlying intercostal spaces as well as the liver capsule were infiltrated with 2% lignocaine. PCBL was performed using a spring-loaded Tru-Cut liver biopsy needle (Max-Core, BARD^®) which was entered in the mid-axillary line, through 7^th or the 8^th intercostal space. No more than 3 passes were made, each lasting less than 1 sec through the liver parenchyma, with a cooperative patient holding breath in full expiration.

Post-PCBL, patients were instructed to turn over in a right lateral position for 2 hours and monitored for adverse events.

Following discharge from hospital, all patients included in the study returned to be tested for vWD and subtypes.

Of the 120 patients who underwent PCBL, 12 (10%) were found to have vWD, of which 6 patients had type I vWD (low levels of vW factor levels) and 6 patients had type II vWD (qualitative defect in vW factor), but none had type III. The prevalence of vWD in our cohort of patients was much higher (10%) than the general population (3%), with a similar distribution between type I and II (Table 1).

There was no major bleeding (requiring transfusion) but 9/12 patients in the vW disease group experienced minor bleeding which settled with pressure. All vW patients also experienced transient post procedural pain lasting <24 hours in addition to biopsy site ecchymosis (Table 2).

PCLB is generally regarded as a safe diagnostic modality. Complications of liver biopsy are extremely rare but potentially hazardous [10] . The majority of complications (60%) occur within two hours, and 96% occur within 24 hours following the procedure [11] [12] . Less than 3% of patients following the procedure require inpatient carerelated to adverse event [7] [13] . A third of patients are known to experience significant pain during the procedure itself but clinically significant bleeding following the liver biopsy occurs only in 1% - 2%, usually apparent within 4 hours post-procedure [6] . Intra-peritoneal hemorrhage is the most disastrousform of bleeding requiring expeditious surgery, others such as intra-parenchymal & biliary, which are self contained by surrounding tissue usually amenable to angiographic embolization [14] -[16] . Unfortunately, fatalities have occurred from uncontained and missed intra-peritoneal hemorrhage in up to 0.01% - 0.3% of patients post-PCBL [6] [17] -[19] .

vWD has traditionally been regarded as a general risk factor for bleeding during invasive procedures [20] . Liver biopsies have been performed safely in patient populations with coagulation defects such as thrombocytopenia and hemophilia following clotting factor replacements or substitutes [21] . However, there is paucity of

^#MELD―Model for end stage liver disease.

data on the safety of PCLB in vWD (most common inherited bleeding disorder in our population [5] , the specific extent of bleeding diathesis encountered in different subtypes of the disease during/post-biopsy and any associated morbidity & mortality, have not been previously described in literature.

In conclusion, our study has shown that patients with vWD can safely undergo PCBL without major bleeding requiring transfusion or need for DDAVP (desmopressin acetate) or cryoprecipitate. Minor bleeding and ecchymosis at the biopsy site may occur at a higher rate than the general population. We concur with the AGA guidelines that outpatient percutaneous liver biopsy is safe and non-threatening despite concomitant minor inherited bleeding diathesis [22] . We propose a much larger cohort to obtain better statistical validation.

Patrick P Basu.

All authors contributed equally to design, data collection and drafting of the manuscript and have all approved the final version before submission.

Patrick P.Basu,Niraj J.Shah,Mark M.Aloysius,K.Rayapudi,RobertBrown, (2015) A Study on the Safety of Liver Biopsy Inpatients with Von Willebrand’s Disease. Open Journal of Gastroenterology,05,134-138. doi: 10.4236/ojgas.2015.59022