<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Agricultural Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8553</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/as.2015.69098</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AS-59856</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Recent Advances in Understanding Plant Heterosis
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>houqian</surname><given-names>Feng</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xiaoliu</surname><given-names>Chen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Shujing</surname><given-names>Wu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xuesen</surname><given-names>Chen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>The State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology; National Research Center for Apple Engineering and Technology, College of Horticulture Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>chenxs@sdau.edu.cn(XC)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>09</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>1033</fpage><lpage>1038</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>16</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>20</month>	<year>September</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>23</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Although heterosis is widely utilized in crop production, its genetic and molecular basis is still elusive. It is arguably that heterosis arises in crosses between genetically and/or epigenetically distinct individuals. Various genetic models have been proposed to explain heterosis, such as dominance and overdominance hypothesis. With the recent advancements in functional genomics, epigenetics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics-related technologies, systems-level approaches have been adopted to understand the molecular basis of heterosis. In this review, we gather a brief account of findings from various studies in order to better understand the genetic and molecular basis of heterosis.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Heterosis</kwd><kwd> Genetic Factor</kwd><kwd> Epigenetic Factor</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. General View of Heterosis</title><p>Heterosis is a common phenomenon in many plants. Heterosis is formed by crossing different strains or varieties. Heterosis refers to the super performance of a hybrid exhibiting increased biomass, size, yield, growth rate, or fertility relative to its parents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref1">1</xref>] . Joseph Koelreuter (1776) described that some plant hybrids displayed superior growth over their parents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref2">2</xref>] . In 1876, Charles Darwin concluded that “the crossed plants when fully grown were plainly taller and more vigorous than the self-fertilised ones”. Then he observed the growth patterns in more than 60 plant species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref3">3</xref>] . The phenomenon was rediscovered by George H. Shull, and he firstly introduced the term heterosis in 1914 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref4">4</xref>] . Since then, heterosis has been widely utilized in crop breeding, especially in maize. In the late 1990s, it was estimated that 65% of the worldwide maize (Zea mays) area was planted as hybrids, and the yield of maize had increased six fold since the use of hybrids started in the 1930s [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref5">5</xref>] . The economic importance of heterosis has led to extensive research to understand its basis. However, the genetic and molecular mechanisms for heterosis are still poorly understood. In this review, we present a brief account of findings in various heterosis studies (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Genetic Analysis of Heterosis</title><p>Although the genetic basis for heterosis has been studied for over a century and several hypotheses have been advanced to explain the phenomenon, less progress has been made for the genetic basis of heterosis. Conventionally, dominance and overdominance were the two most prominent genetic hypotheses for heterosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref6">6</xref>] . The dominance hypothesis proposes that complementation of corresponding deleterious alleles lead to heterosis in hybrids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref8">8</xref>] . The overdominance hypothesis proposes that heterozygous allelic interactions result in heterosis in hybrids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref1">1</xref>] . In summary, both the two genetic hypotheses describe genetic differences between hybrids and inbred lines. However, it is difficult to directly associate the favorable alleles that “dominant” and “overdominant” predict with the phenotypic traits in crop breeding (including maize) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref9">9</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Transcriptomic and Proteomic Analysis of Heterosis</title><p>Various transcriptomic analyses have been carried out to explore the gene expression changes between hybrid and its parents to correlate the changes to heterosis. Based on the modes of gene action in the hybrid, the genes have mainly been classified as additive, dominance and over-dominance (non-additive) expression patterns [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref6">6</xref>] . Additive expression represents mid-parental expression patterns in the hybrid, whereas the dominance model suggests both low and high parent-like expression. In the case of over-dominance, the gene expression level in hybrid is either higher or lower than the level in parent. Various aspects of plant development and different organs have been analyzed at the transcriptome level. In summary, there is no uniform global expression detected in these studies.</p><p>Several studies indicated that non-additive gene expression was prevalent between parent and hybrid [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref10">10</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref13">13</xref>] , while additive gene expression was detected in other studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref15">15</xref>] . In addition, a similar number of genes followed additive and non-additive expression model was also observed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref16">16</xref>] . Interestingly, of the two heterotic rice hybrid, non-additive gene expression was prevalent in one hybrid, while additive gene expression in another at the younger stages of development [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref11">11</xref>] . Although the modes of gene expression vary from different studies, the global trends are similar. For example, heterosis is a genome-wide phenomenon involves global</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Heterosis related studies</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Scope of the research</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Results or factors related to heterosis</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >References</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Genetics</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dominance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref8">8</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Genetics</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Over-dominance</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref1">1</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Transcriptomics</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Global expression trend (additive, non-additive and dominance)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref11">11</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref16">16</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Transcriptomics</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Genomic imprinting</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref10">10</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Transcriptomics</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Parent-of-origin effects</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref19">19</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref21">21</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Transcriptomics</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dosage-sensitive factors</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref22">22</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Transcriptomics</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Altered expression of circadian and flowering genes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref25">25</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Proteomics</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Global expression trend (additive and non-additive)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref27">27</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Proteomics</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Altered expression of isoforms and modifications proteins</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref28">28</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Epigenetics</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >DNA methylation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref24">24</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Epigenetics</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Small RNAs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref17">17</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Energies</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Energy utilization efficiency</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref31">31</xref>]</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>changes in gene expression. More significant expression differences are found in the related species than those within species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>Allelic expression variation was further detected in many plant hybrids, such as maize and rice [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref18">18</xref>] . Some genes in maize showed maternal or paternal like expression patterns, which were suggested to be associated with genomic imprinting [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref10">10</xref>] . Whereas in some studies, the minimal parent-of-origin effects on allele- specific expression were also detected [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref19">19</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref21">21</xref>] .</p><p>A recent study gives a mechanism that allelic diversity is sensitive to dosage-sensitive factors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref22">22</xref>] . Besides genetic factors, epigenetic factor was also suggested to play a potential role in allelic expression in hybrids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref18">18</xref>] . Recently, small RNA levels were measured in inbreds and hybrids. The differential expression patterns of small RNAs have been linked to heterosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref24">24</xref>] . Importantly, several genes including circadian clock gene CCA1 and flowering gene SINGLE FLOWER TRUSS have been found to play an important role in heterosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref25">25</xref>] .</p><p>The expression of proteins in inbreds and hybrids has been measured in various studies, some of which indicated a strong correlation between heterosis and protein patterns [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref26">26</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref27">27</xref>] . Proteomic analysis in maize and rice showed that more frequency of non-additive protein expressional variation than non-additive gene expressional variation in hybrids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref28">28</xref>] . Recently, the expression level of protein was compared using heterotic and non-heterotic maize hybrids. Interestingly, the differential expressions of proteins detected in heterotic hybrids were mainly involved in stress response, protein and carbon metabolism. In addition, the degree of heterosis was suggested to be linked to the frequency of protein isoforms and modifications [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref28">28</xref>] .</p><p>Although the different modes of gene action as well as protein expression patterns were observed in hybrids and they supported the genetic models of dominance and over-dominance, the molecular basis of heterosis is still largely unknown.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Epigenetics Analysis of Heterosis</title><p>Combination of diverged maternal and paternal genomes in the same nucleus may lead to genomic instability, epigenetic and gene expression changes, which ultimately caused the changes of phenotype in hybrid. In the past few years, various studies have been carried out to find the role of epigenetics in heterosis.</p><p>Genome-wide methylation, sRNAs expression, gene expression and physiological index have been analyzed comprehensively in both hybrid and its parents. The variations of DNA methylation and sRNAs were observed between parents and their progeny. A recent study by Shen et al. (2012) found that hybrids had increased cytosine methylation compared with the parents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref24">24</xref>] . Contrast to the higher methylation levels, more down-regu- lated genes were existed in the hybrids than the parental lines. The down-regulated genes including the circadian clock genes CCA1, LHY, have been shown to be involved in heterosis previously. In consistent with the study by Shen et al. (2012), Greaves et al. (2012) also found altered methylomes between hybrid and its parents in Arabiodposis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref23">23</xref>] . In both studies changes occur most frequently at loci where parental methylation levels are markedly different.</p><p>A recent study by Chodavarapu et al. (2012) found that regions of altered methylation are often correlated with changes in sRNA levels [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref18">18</xref>] . Using Arabidposis, Greaves et al. (2012) and Shen et al. (2012) also found a close relationship between DNA methylation and sRNA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref24">24</xref>] . Interestingly, research by Shen et al. (2012) found that the growth vigor was compromised in the F1 hybrids of hen1 (RNA methyltransferase, HUA ENH- ANCER1) mutants, which further supported the notion that sRNAs play a role in heterosis, perhaps by guiding methylation of DNA via the RNA-directed DNA methylation pathway [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref24">24</xref>] .</p><p>Differential expression patterns of small RNAs were observed in rice, wheat and tomato hybrids recently [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref17">17</xref>] . For example, in rice hybrids sRNAs showed more down-regulated than up-regulated. Previously, various studies have proved that sRNAs play an important role in gene regulation and genome integrity maintaining [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref29">29</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref30">30</xref>] . It is possible that, the changes in sRNAs profiling could result in the expression patterns of gene that they control in hybrids, which might be related with the phenotype of the hybrids.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Energy Model Proposed for Heterosis</title><p>A recent energy model was proposed by Goff (2011) to explain differences in growth and yield between inbreds and hybrids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref31">31</xref>] . According to this model, allele-specific gene expression is linked to protein folding and stability, and helps conserve energy and allows faster cell division. It is possible that allelic choice available in hybrids but not inbreds provides the opportunity for hybrids to express the favorable allele and use energy efficiency to accelerate crop improvement.</p><p>Heterosis is a common phenomenon in maize, rice and other species [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref6">6</xref>] . It is likely that a common biological mechanism underlying heterosis is existed in a wide variety of different species. Dominance and overdominance models have been proposed to explain single trait heterosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref32">32</xref>] . At gene expression level, both additive and non-additive mode of differential gene actions have been shown to be involved in the manifestation of heterosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref14">14</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref16">16</xref>] . Genes influencing heterosis could be affected by genomic dosage [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref22">22</xref>] . Recently, mounting evidences of the epigenetic machinery was provided to explain heterosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref24">24</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref34">34</xref>] . Quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping studies indicated many QTLs associated with specific heterosis traits [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref35">35</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref37">37</xref>] . Circadian clocks affected many traits in hybrids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref6">6</xref>] . Energy-use efficiency likely plays an important role in heterosis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59856-ref31">31</xref>] . Taken together, it is likely that the combination of many mechanisms across many genes accounts for the complex heterosis traits (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Possible mechanisms underlying heterosis. In the hybrids (F1), differential gene expression was induced when parent 1 (P1) and parent 2 (P2) genomes was mixed, mainly caused by epigenetic and genetic factors, and could be affected by genomic dosage. These expression changes may affect some major regulatory pathways including circadian clock pathway and energy regulatory pathway. A number of downstream physiology metabolic pathways could be affected, which ultimately affect various aspects of growth and development</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/14-3001179x6.png"/></fig><p>To date, there are still many things that are not clear but with promising for future breakthrough in uncovering the heterosis. First, what is the relationship between genome combination and gene activity at a single gene level? It is known that the differential expression of a large number of genes is emerged when two different genomes come together in a hybrid. Do all these changed transcriptome in hybrid have biological functions? What proportion of the altered hybrid transcriptome could have a major influence on heterosis besides the circadian clock genes? What factors affect on the variable profile of these key genes, mechanisms? Second, how to choose the best combinations of parents for producing “super hybrids” to meet the growing demand in food and biofuels? As we known, the degree of heterosis is proportional to the genetic differences in two parental strains. However, many interspecific hybrids especially distant hybrids cannot survive, which cause hybrid incompatibility. A better understanding of the mechanism for hybrid vigor will help us effectively select the best combinations of parents for the predicting breeding goal, such as the increased production of seeds, fruits and metabolites.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31201593).</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>ShouqianFeng,XiaoliuChen,ShujingWu,XuesenChen, (2015) Recent Advances in Understanding Plant Heterosis. Agricultural Sciences,06,1033-1038. doi: 10.4236/as.2015.69098</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.59856-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shull, G.H. (1908) The Composition of a Field of Maize. Journal of Heredity, 4, 296-301. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jhered/os-4.1.296</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Reed, H.S. (1942) A Short History of the Plant Sciences. Ronald Proess Co., Waltham, 323.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Darwin, C.R. (1876) The Effects of Cross-and Self-Fertilisation in the Vegetable Kingdom. John Murry, London.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shull, G.H. (1948) What Is “Heterosis”? Genetics, 33, 439-446.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Duvick</surname><given-names> J. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2001</year>)<article-title>Prospects for Reducing Fumonisin Contamination of Maize through Genetic Modification</article-title><source> Environmental Health Perspectives</source><volume> 109</volume>,<fpage> 337</fpage>-<lpage>342</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, Z.J. (2010) Molecular Mechanisms of Polyploidy and Hybrid Vigor. Trends in Plant Science, 15, 57-71. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2009.12.003</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jones, D.F. (1917) Dominance of Linked Factors as a Means of Accounting for Heterosis. Genetics, 2, 466-479. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.3.4.310</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Troyer, A.F. (2006) Adaptedness and Heterosis in Corn and Mule Hybrids. Crop Science, 46, 528-543. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.0065</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Duvick, D.N. and Cassman, K.G. (1999) Post-Green Revolution Trends in Yield Potential of Temperate Maize in the North-Central United States. Crop Science, 39, 1622-1630. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.3961622x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guo M., Mary A. Rupe, M.A., Danilevskaya, O.N., Yang, X.F. and Hu, Z.H. (2003) Genome-Wide mRNA Profiling Reveals Heterochronic Allelic Variation and a New Imprinted Gene in Hybrid Maize Endosperm. The Plant Journal, 36, 30-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01852.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, H.Y., He, L., Chen, L.B., Li, L., Liang, M.Z., et al. (2008) A Genome-Wide Transcription Analysis Reveals a Close Correlation of Promoter INDEL Polymorphism and Heterotic Gene Expression in Rice Hybrids. Molecular Plant, 1, 720-731. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssn022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fujimoto, R., Taylor, J.M., Shirasawa, S., Peacock, W.J. and Dennis, E.S. (2012) Heterosis of Arabidopsis Hybrids between C24 and Col Is Associated with Increased Photosynthesis Capacity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 7109-7114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1204464109</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Meyer, R.C., Witucka-Wall, H., Becher, M., Blacha, A., Boudichevskaia, A., et al. (2012) Heterosis Manifestation during Early Arabidopsis Seedling Development Is Characterized by Intermediate Gene Expression and Enhanced Metabolic Activity in the Hybrids. The Plant Journal, 71, 669-683. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05021.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huang, Y., Zhang, L., Zhang, J., Yuan, D., Xu, C., et al. (2006) Heterosis and Polymorphisms of Gene Expression in an Elite Rice Hybrid as Revealed by a Microarray Analysis of 9198 Unique ESTs. Plant Molecular Biology, 62, 579-591. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11103-006-9040-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Swanson-Wagner, R.A., Jia, Y., DeCook, R., Borsuk, L.A., Nettleton, D., et al. (2006) All Possible Modes of Gene Action Are Observed in a Global Comparison of Gene Expression in a Maize F1 Hybrid and Its Inbred Parents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 6805-6810. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0510430103</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guo, M., Rupe, M.A., Yang, X.F., Crasta, O., Zinselmeier, C., et al. (2006) Genome-Wide Transcript Analysis of Maize Hybrids: Allelic Additive Gene Expression and Yield Heterosis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 113, 831-845. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00122-006-0335-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">He, G., Zhu, X.P., Elling, A.A., Chen, L.B., Wang, X.F., et al. (2010) Global Epigenetic and Transcriptional Trends among Two Rice Subspecies and Their Reciprocal Hybrids. The Plant Cell, 22, 17-33. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.109.072041</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chodavarapu, R.K., Feng, S., Ding, B., Stacey, S.A., Lopez, D., Jia, Y., Wang, G.L., Meyers, B.C., Jacobsen, S.E. and Pellegrini, M. (2012) Transcriptome and Methylome Interactions in Rice Hybrids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 12040-12045. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1209297109</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guo, M., Rupe, M.A., Zinselmeier, C., Habben, J., Bowen, B.A. and Smith, O.S. (2004) Allelic Variation of Gene Expression in Maize Hybrids. The Plant Cell, 16, 1707-1716. http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.022087</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stupar, R.M. and Springer, N.M. (2006) Cis-Transcriptional Variation in Maize Inbred Lines B73 and Mo17 Leads to Additive Expression Patterns in the F1 Hybrid. Genetics, 173, 2199-2210. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.106.060699</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baranwal, V.K., Mikkilineni, V., Zehr, U.B., Tyagi, A.K. and Kapoor, S. (2012) Heterosis: Emerging Ideas about Hybrid Vigour. Journal of Experimental Botany, 63, 6309-6314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers291</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yao, H., Gray, A.D., Auger, D.L. and Birchler, J.A. (2013) Genomic Dosage Effects on Heterosis in Triploid Maize. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 2665-2669. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221966110</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Greaves, I.K., Groszmann, M., Ying, H., Taylor, J.M., Peacock, W.J. and Dennis, E.S. (2012) Trans Chromosomal Methylation in Arabidopsis Hybrids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 3570-3575. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1201043109</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shen, H., He, H., Li, J., Chen, W., Wang, X., Guo, L., Peng, Z., He, G., Zhong, S., Qi, Y., Terzaghi, W. and Deng, X.W. (2012) Genome-Wide Analysis of DNA Methylation and Gene Expression Changes in Two Arabidopsis Ecotypes and Their Reciprocal Hybrids. The Plant Cell, 24, 875-892. http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.111.094870</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ni, Z., Kim, E.D., Lackey, E., Liu, J., Zhang, Y., Sun, Q. and Chen, Z.J. (2009) Altered Circadian Rhythms Regulate Growth Vigor in Hybrids and Allopoloids. Nature, 457, 327-331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07523</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hoecher, N., Lamkemeyer, T., Sarholz, B., Paschold, A., Fladerer, C., et al. (2008) Analysis of Non-Additive Protein Accumulation in Young Primary Roots of a Maize (Zea mays L.) F1-Hybrid Compared to Its Parental Inbred Lines. Proteomics, 8, 3882-3894. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200800023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, W., Meng, B., Ge, X., Song, X., Yang, Y., et al. (2008) Proteomic Profiling of Rice Embryos from a Hybrid Rice Cultivar and Its Parental Lines. Proteomics, 8, 4808-4821. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200701164</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dahal, D., Mooney, B.P. and Newton, K.J. (2012) Specific Changes in Total and Mitochondrial Proteomes Are Associated with Higher Levels of Heterosis in Maize Hybrids. The Plant Journal, 72, 70-83. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05056.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">He, L. and Hannon, G.J. (2004) Micro RNAs: Small RNAs with a Big Role in Gene Regulation. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5, 522-531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg1379</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ng, D.W., Lu, J. and Chen, Z.J. (2012) Big Roles for Small RNAs in Polyploidy, Hybrid Vigor, and Hybrid Incompatibility. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 15, 154-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2012.01.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Goff, S.A. (2011) A Unifying Theory for General Multigenic Heterosis: Energy efficiency, Protein Metabolism, and Implications for Molecular Breeding. New Phytologist, 189, 923-937. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03574.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kaeppler, S. (2012) Heterosis: Many Genes, Many Mechanisms-End the Search for an Undiscovered Unifying Theory. ISRN Botany, 2012, Article ID: 682824. http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/682824</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barber, W.T., Zhang, W., Win, H., Varala, K.K., Dorweiler, J.E., Hudson, M.E. and Moose, S.P. (2012) Repeat Associated Small RNAs Vary among Parents and Following Hybridization in Maize. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 10444-10449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1202073109</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shivaprasad, P.V., Dunn, R.M., Santos, B.A., Bassett, A. and Baulcombe, D.C. (2012) Extraordinary Transgressive Phenotypes of Hybrid Tomato Are Influenced by Epigenetics and Small Silencing RNAs. EMBO Journal, 31, 257-266. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.458</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Frascaroli, E., Canè, M.A., Landi, P., Pea, G., Gianfranceschi, L., Villa, M., Morgante, M. and Pè, M.E. (2007) Classical Genetic and Quantitative Trait Loci Analyses of Heterosis in a Maize Hybrid between Two Elite Inbred Lines. Genetics, 176, 625-644. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.106.064493</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Radoev, M., Becker, H.C. and Ecke, W. (2008) Genetic Analysis of Heterosis for Yield and Yield Components in Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) by Quantitative Trait Locus Mapping. Genetics, 179, 1547-1558. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.108.089680</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59856-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Krieger, U., Lippman, Z.B. and Zamir, D. (2010) The Flowering Gene SINGLE FLOWER TRUSS Drives Heterosis for Yield in Tomato. Nature Genetics, 42, 459-463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng.550</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>