<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJAC</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Analytical Chemistry</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8251</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajac.2015.610076</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJAC-59644</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Development and Validation of a High Performance Thin Layer Chromatographic Method for Quantitative Analysis of Saxagliptin
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>alvala</surname><given-names>Srividya</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ettireddy</surname><given-names>Swetha</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ciddi</surname><given-names>Veeresham</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>University College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kakatiya University, Warangal, India</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>09</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>797</fpage><lpage>806</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>17</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>13</month>	<year>September</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>16</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  A simple, specific, accurate and precise high performance thin layer chromatographic method (HPTLC) was developed for the quantitative analysis of Saxagliptin in active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and pharmaceutical dosage forms. The method was achieved using silica gel aluminum plate 60 F
  <sub>254</sub> (10 &#215; 10 cm) as stationary phase and Methanol:Chloroform (6:4 v/v) as mobile phase. The developed plate was scanned densitometrically using UV 222 nm wavelength. The R
  <sub>f</sub> value of Saxagliptin was found to be 0.50 &#177; 0.02. The developed method was validated according to ICH guidelines. Limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) of Saxagliptin by this method were found as 
  7.96 ng/spot and 26.54 ng/spot, respectively. The method was found to be sensitive, specific, linear, accurate, precise and robust for the quantitative analysis of Saxagliptin in both APIs and marketed tablet formulation.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>HPTLC</kwd><kwd> Saxagliptin</kwd><kwd> Quantitative Analysis</kwd><kwd> Stress Induced Degradation</kwd><kwd> Validation</kwd><kwd> API</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a complex disease mainly caused by impaired beta cell function and insulin resistance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59644-ref1">1</xref>] . It is the most common form of diabetes comprising of 90% to 95% of all diabetes cases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59644-ref2">2</xref>] . Oral antidiabetic drugs, along with diet and exercise, can help to control T2DM-associated hyperglycemia in adults [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59644-ref3">3</xref>] . Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are a class of oral antidiabetic agents which increase circulating concentrations of the incretin gastrointestinal hormones, glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide. The incretins are rapidly released after meals and stimulate glucose-dependent insulin secretion. Glucagon-like peptide-1 also inhibits glucagon secretion, thereby attenuating postprandial glucose excursions. The DPP-4 inhibitors improve glycaemic control by blocking the rapid inactivation of incretins, mainly glucagon-like peptide-1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59644-ref4">4</xref>] . All the DPP-4 inhibitors are orally available and are rapidly absorbed. Within 5 min of administration, they exhibit significant inhibition of plasma DPP-4 activity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59644-ref5">5</xref>] . Saxagliptin is an oral anti-hypoglycemic agent and it belongs to selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor class [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59644-ref6">6</xref>] . It is chemically known as (1s,3s,5s)?2?[(2s)?2?amino?2?(3?hydroxy?1?adamantyl) acetyl]?2?azabicyclohexane?3?carbonitrile [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59644-ref7">7</xref>] . Saxagliptin has been shown to be beneficial in glucose management as well as in the achievement of glycated hemoglobin goals (HbA1c &lt; 7%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59644-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>Several analytical methods have been developed for quantitative analysis of Saxagliptin in bulk and pharma- ceutical formulations like UV?spectrophotometric method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59644-ref8">8</xref>] , ion-pairing spectrophotometric method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59644-ref9">9</xref>] , Reverse Phase-High Performance Liquid Chromatography (RP-HPLC) method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59644-ref10">10</xref>] , RP-HPLC with fluorescence detection method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59644-ref11">11</xref>] , etc. Ultra performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method has been developed for quantification of Saxagliptin in rat plasma [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59644-ref12">12</xref>] . Liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method has been developed and validated for simultaneous analysis of Saxagliptin and its major metabolite [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59644-ref13">13</xref>] . However, so far there are no reports on High Performance Thin Layer Chromatographic method for quantitative analysis of Saxagliptin in both active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and marketed tablet formulation. Hence the present study was focused for the development and validation of an efficient HPTLC method for the estimation of Saxagliptin.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Chemicals and Drugs</title><p>Saxagliptin (API) was obtained as a gift sample from Mylan laboratories Ltd. (Hyderabad, India). Onglyza (Saxagliptin-5 mg) tablets were purchased from Bristol-Myers Squibb (USA). Solvents like Chloroform and Methanol were purchased from SD fine chemicals Ltd. (Mumbai, India).</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Equipment</title><p>It consists of an applicator of model LINOMAT-5 and a scanner (CAMAG, Switzerland) with UV detector. The data was monitored and processed using WINCAT software. The sample was loaded on to the TLC plates by Hamilton Rheodyne injector syringe of 100 &#181;L (CAMAG) and the plate was developed in twin trough chamber (20 &#215; 20).</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Standard Solution Preparation</title><p>Standard stock solution was prepared by dissolving 10 mg of Saxagliptin in 100 mL of methanol to obtain a solution with final concentration, 100 &#181;g/mL.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Sample Preparation</title><p>Ten tablets of ONGLYZA were weighed and finely powdered. An accurately weighed powder equivalent to 10 mg was taken to 100 mL volumetric flask and dissolved in 50 mL Methanol and finally volume was made up to the mark with the Methanol to obtain a concentration of 100 &#181;g/mL. This solution was sonicated for 10 min and filtered. Filtration is done to remove the excipients and to avoid clogging of sample applicator syringe.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Development of a Method</title><p>For the optimization of an HPTLC method, several mobile phase compositions were tried as developing solvent systems, they are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Method Validation</title><p>The developed method was validated for various parameters like linearity, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), accuracy, precision and robustness according to ICH guidelines.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Optimization of mobile phase</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >S. No.</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Mobile Phase Used</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Observation</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Solvents</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ratios</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Butanol:Ethanol:Water</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8:7:4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No spots</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Butanol:Glacial acetic acid:Water</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5:0.2:0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tailing</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chloroform:Ethanol:Water</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8:1:1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No spots</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Methanol:Acetonitrile</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7:3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spots obtained but not resolved properly</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Methanol:Chloroform</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7:3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >No tailing</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Methanol:Chloroform</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6:4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Well defined spots</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><sec id="s4_1"><title>4.1. Linearity</title><p>Different concentration solutions of Saxagliptin like 400, 600, 800, 1000 and 1200 ng/spot were applied on the TLC plate from the standard stock solution. After the development the TLC plate was scanned under UV at 222 nm and the peaks were recorded using WINCATS software version 1.4.3. The calibration curve was obtained by plotting peak area vs. concentration, using linear regression model. According to ICH guidelines, an acceptance criterion of linearity for an analytical method is correlation coefficient should be not less than 0.998.</p></sec><sec id="s4_2"><title>4.2. LOD and LOQ</title><p>The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) of Saxagliptin by the developed HPTLC method were calculated using the following formulae, respectively.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.59644-formula443"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2201238x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where σ is the standard deviation of the response and S is the slope of the calibration curve.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.59644-formula444"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2201238x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where σ is the standard deviation of the response and S is the slope of the calibration curve.</p></sec><sec id="s4_3"><title>4.3. Accuracy</title><p>Accuracy is calculated as the percentage of recovery by the assay of known added amount of analyte in the sample, or as the difference between the mean and the accepted true value, together with the confidence intervals. As per ICH guidelines accuracy should be assessed using a minimum of nine determinations i.e., three replicates at three concentrations across the specified range of the procedure. Three different levels (50%, 100% and 150%) of standard solutions were added to a pre-analyzed sample and were analyzed for % recovery of Saxagliptin. Acceptance criterion is the mean % recovery should not be less than 98% and not more than 102%.</p></sec><sec id="s4_4"><title>4.4. Precision</title><p>ICH guidelines recommend that repeatability should be assessed using a minimum of nine determinations covering the specified range of the procedure (i.e., three replicates of three concentrations) or using a minimum of six determinations at 100% of the test concentration. It can be determined by measuring repeatability, intermediate precision and reproducibility. Three different concentration solutions of standard Saxagliptin were applied to the TLC plate and the chromatograms were recorded. The precision of an analytical procedure is usually expressed as the variance, standard deviation or coefficient of variation of a series of measurements and the acceptance criterion is % RSD of the peak areas should not be more than 2.0%.</p></sec><sec id="s4_5"><title>4.5. Robustness</title><p>The robustness of an analytical method is a measure of its capacity to remain unaffected by small but deliberate variations in method parameters and provides an indication of its reliability during normal usage. It was done by changing the mobile phase volume and development time while constantly maintaining the remaining parameters. The acceptance criterion is % RSD of the peak areas should not be more than 2.0%.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Stability Studies</title><p>To evaluate the stability indicating properties of the developed HPTLC method, forced degradation studies were carried out in accordance to the ICH guidelines and were performed by exposing drug solution to stress conditions like acidic (0.1 N HCl, 1 N HCl), basic (0.1 N NaOH, 1 N NaOH), peroxide (3% H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> v/v) and photo induced degradation. The resulting solutions were analyzed for analyte peak and unknown degradants generated by stress induced degradation.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s6_1"><title>6.1. Optimization of HPTLC Method for Quantitative Analysis of Saxagliptin</title><p>After multiple trials an optimized mobile phase was developed for the HPTLC analysis of Saxagliptin. The standard and test samples were spotted in the form of bands of width 8 mm using a 100 &#181;L syringe on precoated silica gel aluminum plate 60 F<sub>254</sub> (10 &#215; 10 cm) using a CAMAG Linomat-5 sample applicator. The development was carried out in 20 &#215; 20 cm twin trough glass chamber using Methanol:Chloroform (6:4 v/v) as mobile phase. The saturation time for mobile phase was 20 min. The development time was 20 to 30 minutes. After the development, the TLC plates were air dried and were densitometrically scanned using CAMAG thin layer chromatographic scanner at 222 nm. The chromatograms were recorded using WINCATS software version 1.4.3. The chromatogram of Saxagliptin is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. This method has shown good resolution of Saxagliptin in both standard and test samples and the R<sub>f </sub>value was found to be 0.50 &#177; 0.02.</p></sec><sec id="s6_2"><title>6.2. Assay of Saxagliptin in Formulation</title><p>The chromatograms of standard as well as test Saxagliptin solutions were recorded and the percentage of drug content was calculated. The percentage assay for Saxagliptin was found to be 98.90%, which lies within the limits mentioned by ICH (98% - 120%). Hence the developed method can be routinely used for the estimation of Saxagliptin in the tablet formulations. The chromatogram of Saxagliptin test solution (sample solution) was shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s6_3"><title>6.3. Method Validation</title><sec id="s6_3_1"><title>6.3.1. Linearity</title><p>Calibration curve of Saxagliptin was plotted using peak area vs. concentration and was shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>.</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Chromatogram of standard Saxagliptin (800 ng/spot)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2201238x8.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Chromatogram of Saxagliptin test solution (800 ng/spot)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2201238x9.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Calibration curve of Saxagliptin</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2201238x10.png"/></fig><p>Linearity was found in the concentration range of 400 - 1200 ng/spot, which was shown by a 3D display in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>. Saxagliptin correlation coefficient value was found to be 0.998. As per ICH guidelines, it lies in acceptable limit and hence the method was found to be linear.</p></sec><sec id="s6_3_2"><title>6.3.2. LOD and LOQ</title><p>The lowest possible concentration of Saxagliptin that can be detected and quantified by the present method was found to be 7.96 ng/spot and 26.54 ng/spot, respectively. The low values of LOD and LOQ indicates that the method can be used for detection and quantification of Saxagliptin over a very wide range of concentrations in formulations.</p><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> 3D display of Saxagliptin linearity</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2201238x11.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s6_3_3"><title>6.3.3. Accuracy</title><p>Mean percentage recovery values at three different concentrations of Saxagliptin were calculated and the results were shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. According to ICH guidelines, the % recovery of Saxagliptin at each level was within the limits of 98% to 102%. Hence, the method was proved to be accurate.</p></sec><sec id="s6_3_4"><title>6.3.4. Precision</title><p>Intra-day and Inter-day precision data of Saxagliptin was shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. % RSD values of Saxagliptin in both intra- and inter-day precision studies were found to be less than 2, which were within the limits mentioned by ICH guidelines. Hence the method was found to be precise.</p></sec><sec id="s6_3_5"><title>6.3.5. Robustness</title><p>Robustness was done by changing the mobile phase volume and saturation time of development chamber. The data is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s7"><title>7. Stability Studies</title><p>The standard drug was subjected to acid, base (alkali), oxidation and photolytic degradation studies and their chromatograms were shown in Figures 5-8. Results of Saxagliptin degradation studies are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>. These results revealed the suitability of the method to study stability of Saxagliptin in APIs and pharmaceutical dosage forms.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>8. Conclusion</title><p>The present study was aimed for the development and validation of HPTLC method for the estimation of Saxagliptin in bulk as well as pharmaceutical dosage forms. After performing various trials, a sensitive method was developed and was validated according to ICH guidelines. The method was proved to be sensitive, specific, linear, accurate, precise and robust for the quantitative analysis of Saxagliptin in active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and pharmaceutical dosage forms. It does not suffer from interference from excipients present in</p><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Chromatogram of acid degraded Saxagliptin (800 ng/spot)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2201238x12.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Accuracy study of Saxagliptin</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Recovery level</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample (ng/spot)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Standard (ng/spot)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Amount found (ng/spot)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >% Recovery</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean (%) &#177; SD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >% RSD</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >50%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >400</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1189.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >98.17 &#177; 0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >1.015</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1178.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1165.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >100%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1618.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >100.50 &#177; 0.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >0.608</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1598.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1607.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.46</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >150%</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >1200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2016.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >100.03 &#177; 0.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >0.715</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1988.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1996.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.83</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Intra- and inter-day precision study of Saxagliptin</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Concentration (ng/spot)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >% RSD</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Intra-day precision</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Inter-day precision</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >600</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.124</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.748</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.789</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.113</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.615</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.893</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Chromatogram of alkali degraded Saxagliptin (800 ng/spot)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2201238x13.png"/></fig><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> Chromatogram of oxidation degraded Saxagliptin (800 ng/spot)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2201238x14.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Robustness data of Saxagliptin</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameter</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Condition opted</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Concentration</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R<sub>F</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean (%) &#177; SD</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >% RSD</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Volume of mobile phase</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12 mL</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >800 ng/spot</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >892.78 &#177; 2.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.014</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15 mL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >881.89 &#177; 1.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.69</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >18 mL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >902.93 &#177; 1.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.838</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Saturation time of development chamber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20 min</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >800 ng/spot</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >876.89 &#177; 2.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.952</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30 min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >905.21 &#177; 1.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.090</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >40 min</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >886.67 &#177; 1.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.615</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig8"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref></label><caption><title> Chromatogram of photolytic degraded Saxagliptin (800 ng/spot)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-2201238x15.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Saxagliptin degradation studies</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stress conditions applied for Saxagliptin (1000 ng/spot)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Time (h)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >% of active drug present after degradation &#177; SD</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Acid (HCl 0.1 N; 80˚C)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.65 &#177; 1.72</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Acid (HCl 1 N; 80˚C)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.23 &#177; 1.53</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Alkali (NaOH 0.1 N; 80˚C)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.08 &#177; 0.97</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Alkali (NaOH 1 N; 80˚C)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.71 &#177; 1.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3% H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.18 &#177; 1.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Photolytic degradation (Sunlight)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.65 &#177; 1.46</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>the pharmaceutical dosage forms as well as from the degradants of Saxagliptin resulted from stress-induced degradation studies. Hence this method can be conveniently adopted for quality control analysis and stability assays of Saxagliptin in APIs and pharmaceutical dosage forms.</p></sec><sec id="s9"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors are thankful to Mylan laboratories Ltd. (Hyderabad, India) for the kind gift of Saxagliptin Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API).</p></sec><sec id="s10"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>SalvalaSrividya,EttireddySwetha,CiddiVeeresham, (2015) Development and Validation of a High Performance Thin Layer Chromatographic Method for Quantitative Analysis of Saxagliptin. American Journal of Analytical Chemistry,06,797-806. doi: 10.4236/ajac.2015.610076</p></sec><sec id="s11"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.59644-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, C.J., Liu, X.J., Bai, L., Yu, Q., Zhang, Q.M., Yu, P. and Yu, D.M. (2014) Efficacy and Safety of Vildagliptin, Saxagliptin or Sitagliptin as Add-On Therapy in Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled with Dual Combination of Traditional Oral Hypoglycemic Agents. Diabetology &amp; Metabolic Syndrome, 6, 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-5996-6-69</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59644-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Qaseem, A., Linda, L.H., Donna, E.S., Melissa, S. and Paul, S. (2012) Oral Pharmacologic Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians. Annals of Internal Medicine, 156, 218-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-156-3-201202070-00011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59644-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saine, M.E., Carbonari, D.M., Newcomb, C.W., Melissa, S.N., Kevin, H., Vincent, L.R., et al. (2015) Determinants of Saxagliptin Use among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated with Oral Anti-Diabetic Drugs. BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, 16, 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40360-015-0007-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59644-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Scheen, A.J., Charpentier, G., Ostgren, C.J., Hellqvist, A. and Gause-Nilsson, I. (2010) Efficacy and Safety of Saxagliptin in Combination with Metformin Compared with Sitagliptin in Combination with Metformin in Adult Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Metabolism Research and Reviews, 26, 540-549. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.1114</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59644-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Deacon, C.F. (2011) Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: A Comparative Review. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 13, 7-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1326.2010.01306.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59644-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Michael, E.C. and Robert, F. (2012) Saxagliptin for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Assessing Cardiovascular Data. Cardiovascular Diabetology, 11, 1-8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59644-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sravana Kumara, K. and Sailaja, B. (2015) Analytical Method Development and Validation for Estimation of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors: A Review. International Journal of Current Research in Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2, 83-98.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59644-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kalaichelvi, R. and Jayachandran, E. (2011) Validated Spectroscopic Method for estimation of Saxagliptin in Pure and from Tablet Formulation. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 3, 179-180.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59644-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ramalingam, K. and Jayachandran, E. (2012) Extractive Spectrophotometric Estimation of Saxagliptin in Pure and in Pharmaceutical Dosage Form. American Journal of Pharma Tech Research, 2, 429-433.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59644-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Serife, E.K.T., Mustafa, V.K. and Demet, D. (2013) An HPLC Method for the Determination of Saxagliptin in Human Plasma with Fluorescence Detection. Journal of Advances in Chemistry, 3, 810-818.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59644-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vaishali, V. and Anand Kumara, D. (2013) Development and Validation of a Liquid Chromatographic Method for Estimation of Saxagliptin in Tablet Dosage Form. Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry, 6, 552-554.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59644-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gao, J., Yuan, Y., Lu, Y. and Yao, M. (2012) Development of A rapid UPLC-MS/MS Method for Quantification of Saxagliptin in Rat Plasma and Application to Pharmacokinetic Study. Biomed Chromatography, 26, 1482-1487. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bmc.2720</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59644-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xiaohui, X., Roger, D., Huidong, G., Lisa, J., Christophera, H.S., Laura, C., et al. (2012) Liquid Chromatography and Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for the Quantitative Determination of Saxagliptin and Its Major Pharmacologically Active 5-Monohydroxy Metabolite in Human Plasma: Method Validation and Overcoming Specific and Non-Specific Binding at Low Concentrations. Journal of Chromatography B, 889-890, 77-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2012.01.033</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>