<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2015.614229</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-59513</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Fertilization with Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium in Upland Rice Cultivars in the Southern Region of Rond&#244;nia, Brazil
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>dimar</surname><given-names>Rodrigues Soares</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Robertt</surname><given-names>Fernandes</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Laércio</surname><given-names>da Silva Londero</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Leandro</surname><given-names>Galon</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fabiana</surname><given-names>Ferreira Pires</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Marcelo</surname><given-names>de Andrade Barbosa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Diego</surname><given-names>Lopes dos Santos</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Samara</surname><given-names>Cristina Sampaio Correa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Everton</surname><given-names>Augusto Sampaio Correa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Remy</surname><given-names>Carvalho dos Santos</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Agronomy, College Amazon (FAMA), Vilhena, Brazil</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Federal University Mato Grosso (UFMT), Cuiaba, Brazil</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Agronomy, Federal Institute of Education Science and Technology of Rond&amp;amp;ocirc;nia (IFRO),
Colorado do Oeste, Brazil</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Soil Science, S&amp;amp;atilde;o Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, Brazil</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Department Herbology, Federal University of the Border South (UFFS), Erechim, Brazil</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>09</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>14</issue><fpage>2263</fpage><lpage>2271</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>18</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>7</month>	<year>September</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>10</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The upland rice productivity in the state of Rond?nia is still low, in view of the potential of culture. The use of cultivars adapted to different regions and more responsive to fertilizer employed is an essential practice which can change that. The aim of this study was to evaluate the agronomic characteristics and productivity of two upland rice cultivars with nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (N-P-K) doses in two municipalities in the southern state of Rondonia region. The experimental design was a randomized block design with four replications in a factorial 2 &#215; 2 &#215; 5, with the first factor composed of two cultivars (hybrid Ecco and conventional farming AN Cambar&#225;), the second factor, the environment of the two municipalities, Cerejeiras and Vilhena and the third factor of five doses of N-P-K (0-0-0, 30-40-30, 60-60-60, 90-90-90 and 120-100-120 kg&#183;ha
  <sup>-1</sup>). The characteristics evaluated were: tillering, number of integers and sterile grains per panicle, weight of 1000 grains, grain yield (kg&#183;ha
  <sup>-1</sup>) and whole grain yield. There was no triple interaction between the three factors for any of the traits. The hybrid Ecco has higher tillering ability than AN Cambara and presents fewer sterile grains per panicle, heavier 1000 grains and hence greater productivity. For both cultivars, the highest yields are obtained with a dose of 120-100-120 kg&#183;ha
  <sup>-1</sup> N-P-K. For the Ecco, the productivity is achieved with this dose and the dose of 90-90-90 kg&#183;ha
  <sup>-1</sup> is statistically similar. There is no difference in productivity between the municipalities when the dose of N-P-K is less than 60-60-60 kg&#183;ha
  <sup>-1</sup>. The highest yield of whole grains in function of N-P-K fertilization is obtained in Cerejeiras.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Oryza sativa L.</kwd><kwd> Productivity</kwd><kwd> Hybridization</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The upland rice is an important culture in cultivation systems in South America. In this scenario, Brazil stands out as the largest producer [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59513-ref1">1</xref>] . The upland rice cultivation is characterized by aerobic condition root development of the plant [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59513-ref2">2</xref>] . This system is made in well-drained soil without water accumulation in the field, so the culture depends entirely on rain water for the water necessary for their development [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59513-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>The Rio Grande do Sul is responsible for 67% of Brazilian production of rice, which is grown in irrigated system [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59513-ref4">4</xref>] . However, in others states most of the rice-growing is done in the dry system, mainly in central Brazil, known as cerrado.</p><p>In the state of Rond&#244;nia (RO) municipalities of Cabixi, Vilhena, S&#227;o Francisco do Guapor&#233;, Cerejeiras, Corumbiara, Ariquemes, Castanheiras, Buritis, S&#227;o Felipe d’Oeste and Pimenteiras do Oeste are the largest producers of rice, accounting for 51% of production state [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59513-ref5">5</xref>] . In recent years, with the decline of the agricultural frontier, the upland rice, which has long been known as culture of openness, it has occupied new spaces. The crop is being used as a part of rotation systems with other crops, such as soybeans, and also pastures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59513-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>The upland rice was highlighted as a pioneer culture in clearing the Brazilian cerrado. At that time (the 1970s), productivity was very low, rarely exceeded 1.5 Mg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>, mainly due to low technology applied [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59513-ref5">5</xref>] . Currently, the productivity of upland rice in RO is 2.8 Mg per hectare. This production is much lower than that achieved by rice producing states like Rio Grande do Sul, 7.2 Mg∙ha<sup>−1</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59513-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59513-ref6">6</xref>] , despite the two cropping systems (rainfed and irrigated) are very different, it is not impossible that the upland rice also reaches productivity similar to irrigated. However, some factors must be taken into account to achieve the desired productivity.</p><p>An alternative to increasing the productivity of upland rice is the use of hybrid cultivars. However, research on hybrid cultivars of upland rice in Brazil is still rare. According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59513-ref8">8</xref>] , these cultivars have better development of root system and increased tillering, resulting in obtaining higher yields. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59513-ref8">8</xref>] and [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59513-ref9">9</xref>] reported productivities with upland rice hybrid of 6.7 to 4.6 Mg∙ha<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. Working with conventional cultivars [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59513-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59513-ref11">11</xref>] also achieved yields around 4 - 5 Mg per hectare. Therefore, the choice of suitable cultivation for each region is an extremely important step.</p><p>Another factor to be taken into consideration is the response of cultivars the level of technology employed, for example, the yield obtained as a function of applied nutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. Whereas most of the cerrado soils are Oxisols and Ultisols that, in general, are acidic and have low nutrient content [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59513-ref3">3</xref>] . It should be noted also that rice is also being used in the recovery of degraded pastures, and as the first crop to be installed in this recovery process. This becomes even more important employment of N-P-K fertilization and the ability of the cultivars to take advantage of these nutrients.</p><p>Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the agronomic characteristics and productivity of two upland rice cultivars, with a hybrid and conventional farming with N-P-K doses in two cities in the southern state of Rond&#244;nia region.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><p>The experiments were conducted in the agricultural year 2010/2011 in the municipalities of Vilhena and Cerejeiras, south of the state of Rondonia. In Vilhena, the test was conducted at the Experimental Farm of the University of Amazon, located at a latitude S12˚44'26&quot; and a longitude 60˚08'45&quot;W, altitude of 612 m. In Cerejeiras, the experiment was also conducted in the University of Amazon on the Experimental Field, with an altitude of 257.8 m, 13˚11'19.6&quot;S latitude and 60˚51'43.9&quot;W longitude. The precipitation in southern Rondonia are regular averaging 2023 mm in the period from October to June, when the crop cultivation is performed, with emphasis on the soybean, rice and corn. During this period temperatures are favorable to agriculture Also, ranging from 22.1˚C to 25.4˚C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59513-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>The experimental design was a randomized block design with four replications in a factorial 2 &#215; 2 &#215; 5, with the first factor composed of two cultivars (hybrid Ecco and conventional farming AN Cambar&#225;), the second factor for the environment, which are the municipalities of Cerejeiras and Vilhena and the third factor of five doses of N-P-K (0-0-0, 30-40-30, 60-60-60, 90-90-90 and 120-100 -120 kg∙ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>).</p><p>The experimental units were comprised of the area of 5 &#215; 2.0 m (10 m<sup>2</sup>), this being sown eight lines of 5 m in length, spaced at 0.25 m between rows. To harvest was discarded two border lines and 0.5 m from each end portion. The chemical characteristics of the soils in the municipalities of Cerejeiras and Vilhena in the 0 - 20 cm layer are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>The soils were prepared in conventional farming system using disc harrow and leveling. Liming was performed with calcined limestone (48% Ca oxide, 16% Mg oxide and relative power of total neutralization of 124%) 40 days before planting, seeking to raise the base saturation to 50%. Planting was carried out in De- cember 2010. The density of used sowing was 40 kg∙ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> for cultivating hybrid Ecco and 80 kg∙ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> for con- ventional farming AN Cambara.</p><p>The phosphor was applied on the whole planting along with 30% potassium and 30% nitrogen. In topdressing (20 days after emergence) was applied 60% of nitrogen and potassium and in the issue of panicles the remaining 10%. The sources of fertilizer are used, the single superphosphate (19% P), urea (45% N) and potassium potash (65% K).</p><p>The weed control was made 25 days after emergence with application of cyhalofop-butyl herbicide (1.5 L∙ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) and Metsulfurom-methyl (3 g∙ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>). The disease control was done with fungicide tricyclazole (300 g∙ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) + Tebuconazole (750 mL∙ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) - at 50, 70 and 85 days after emergence; and insect control with a permethrin insecticide application base (150 mL∙ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) at 15 days after emergence.</p><p>The following characteristics were evaluated: tillering―performed at 35 days after emergence (maximum tillering), measured on the line on a meter; number of whole grains per panicle and sterile―for it was collected ten panicles randomly in each experimental unit; the 1000 seeds―numbered sample taken from each experi- mental unit; Grain yield (kg∙ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>), and the mass of grains was adjusted to 13% moisture, and whole grain yield― obtained from dairy apparatus (rice tester model PAZ-1DT). After obtaining the data, it carried out a preliminary analysis of variance (Test F) and then the unfolding of degrees of freedom treatments when there was interaction between the factors. Means were compared by the test “Tukey (P &lt; 0.05)” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59513-ref13">13</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>Tillering was influenced by the type of cultivar, environment and fertilizer. The interaction was significant for cultivar &#215; environment, fertilization &#215; cultivar and environment &#215; fertilization, however, there was no triple interaction cultivar &#215; environment &#215; fertilization (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). From <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, it is observed that, tillering hybrids Ecco was higher than AN Cambar&#225; for both two municipalities. For the Ecco tillering it was higher in the municipalitie of Cerejeiras, while for the AN Cambar&#225; no significant difference between the tested municipalities (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>With this, we can infer that to the cultivar AN Cambar&#225; the tillering is an intrinsic characteristic, occurring little environmental interference that feature, while the hybrid Ecco shows greater capacity to respond to envi- ronmental growing conditions. Observing <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>, we can strengthen this hypothesis, as in all N-P-K combi- nations tested, the hybrid tillering surpassed the AN Cambara. It is noteworthy that for the AN Cambara was no significant difference between treatments without fertilizer (00-00-00) and 30-40-30, but with the Ecco was significant difference between treatments without fertilization, 30-40-30 and 60-60-60, demonstrating that responds better to fertilization with N-P-K.</p><p>To take into consideration that the hybrid seeding rate is 50% lower than that of conventional rice cultivars, it can be concluded that this has an excellent ability to tillering, given the best results in relation to AN Cambara (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59513-ref9">9</xref>] also reported the high capacity of tillering hybrid Ecco compared to conventional five cultivars: BRS Primavera, AN Cambara, BRS Monarca, BRS Sertaneja and BRS MG Curinga, and the two cultivars first mentioned, are the most planted in the state of Rond&#244;nia.</p><p>Regarding interaction environment &#215; fertilization, there was only significant difference between the munici- palities in the unfertilized treatment and with treatment 90-90-90 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Chemical characterization of soils of the municipalities used in the experiment</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="14"  >Cerejeiras</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH CaCl<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >O. M.<sup>1</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >K</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >H + Al</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >CEC<sup>2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >B.S.<sup>3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Particle size (g∙dm<sup>−</sup><sup>3</sup>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01 mol・L<sup>−1</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >g∙dm<sup>−</sup><sup>3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >mg∙dm<sup>−</sup><sup>3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >mmolc∙dm<sup>−</sup><sup>3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Clay</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Silt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sand</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >6.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >200</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >720</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="14"  >Vilhena</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH CaCl<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >O. M.</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >K</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ca</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >H + Al</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CEC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >B.S.</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Particle size (g∙dm<sup>−</sup><sup>3</sup>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01 mol・L<sup>−1</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >g∙dm<sup>−</sup><sup>3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >mg∙dm<sup>−</sup><sup>3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >mmolc∙dm<sup>−</sup><sup>3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Clay</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Silt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sand</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >4.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >180</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >800</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>1</sup>Organic matter, <sup>2</sup>Cation exchange capacity e. <sup>3</sup>Base saturation.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Analysis of variance for the tillering characteristics (Perf), number of whole grains (GI), number of sterile (GE), 1000 grain weight (1000 G), yield (PROD) and yield of whole grains (RGI (%))</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Variation causes</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >GL</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Mean square</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Perf</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GI</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GE</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1000 G</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >PROD.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >RGI (%)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cultivar (C)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101,887.8<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12,186.9<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >413.9<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.63<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30,239,767.1<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.16<sup>ns</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Environment (A)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8140.6<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3672.9<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >695.2<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >137.19<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3,989,696.8<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >770.86<sup>**</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fertilization(AD)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18,359.02<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1525.2<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.4<sup>ns</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.44<sup>ns</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12,276,983.7<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >770.86<sup>ns</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C &#215; A</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1629.01<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >163.4<sup>ns</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.6<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.82<sup>ns</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >400,392<sup>ns</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >334.83<sup>**</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C &#215; AD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2002.03<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >549.2<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5<sup>ns</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.27<sup>ns</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,013,915.5<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.49<sup>ns</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A &#215; AD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >923.8<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >788.7<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.8<sup>ns</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.31<sup>ns</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >901,327.1<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.19<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C &#215; A &#215; AD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >154.5<sup>ns</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.5<sup>ns</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.1<sup>ns</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.67<sup>ns</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >107,823.3<sup>ns</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.19<sup>ns</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Block</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1037.5<sup> *</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95<sup>ns</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4<sup>ns</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.15<sup>ns</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >543,586.3<sup>ns</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.14<sup>ns</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Res&#237;due</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >352.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >156.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >284,028.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.13</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>*</sup>Significant at (p &lt; 0.05), <sup>**</sup>Significant at (p &lt; 0.01), <sup>ns</sup>not significant.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Tillering of upland rice depending on the cultivar and growing environment</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Cultivars</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Munic&#237;palities (Environment)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cerejeiras</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vilhena</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ecco</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >177.95 aA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >148.75 aB</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AN Cambar&#225;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.55 bA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.4 bA</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Means followed by the same lower case letters in the columns and lines not statistically different (Tukey P &lt; 0.05).</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Tillering of upland rice according to the cultivar and the doses of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (N-P-K)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Cultivars</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Doses de N-P-K (kg∙ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >00-00-00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30-40-30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60-60-60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90-90-90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120-100-120</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ecco</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103 aD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >134.37 aC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >175.37 aB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >190.12 aAB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >213.87 aA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AN Cambar&#225;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.25 bC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.25 bBC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.75 bB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108.62 bAB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >121 bA</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Means followed by the same lower case letters in the columns and lines not statistically different (Tukey P &lt; 0.05).</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Tillering of upland rice according of the crop environment and doses of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (N-P-K)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Municipalities</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Doses de N-P-K (kg∙ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >00-00-00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30-40-30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60-60-60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90-90-90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120-100-120</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cerejeiras</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102.87 aD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >114.12 aCD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >138.75 aBC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >162.75 aAB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >170.25 aA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vilhena</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.37 bD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103.5 aC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >124.37 aBC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >136 bB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >164.62 aA</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Means followed by the same lower case letters in the columns and lines not statistically different (Tukey P &lt; 0.05).</p><p>All factors significantly influenced the number of whole grains per panicle, however, only there was a significant interaction for fertilization &#215; cultivar and environment &#215; fertilization. As there was no interaction cultivar &#215; environment, these two factors will be assessed independently as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p><p>The largest number of whole grains per panicle was obtained in the municipality of Vilhena and, with regard to cultivars, the AN Cambara stood out in relation to Ecco (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). Regarding the interaction cultivar x fertilization, unlike tillering, for this variable, the highest values observed in the treatments (fertilizer), were observed in cultivar AN Cambard (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>). Another important fact is that the Ecco the fertilizations did not affect the number of whole grains per panicle, however, for the AN Cambar&#225; only significant difference between the treatment 00-00-00 and the others, ie the number of grains whole per panicle was impaired only in the absence of fertilization, with no response due to higher doses of N-P-K.</p><p>When the treatments were employed 60-60-60, 90-90-90 and 120-100-120, the municipality of Vilhena provided to obtain more of whole grains per panicle (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>), compared to the municipality of Cerejeiras. Evaluating fertilization alone within each municipality in Cerejeiras no significant difference between any of the used fertilizers. In Vilhena 00-00-00 and 30-40-30 treatments had lower number of whole grains per panicle than when using larger doses of N-P-K.</p><p>The number of sterile grains per panicle was influenced by cultivar and environment (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>), also occurring interaction between these factors (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>). The cultivar AN Cambara had the highest number of sterile grain than Ecco in both municipalities. Therefore for the hybrid Ecco and for the AN Cambara, the lowest number of sterile grains were observed in the municipality of Cerejeiras. It is noteworthy, however, that for Ecco the differ-</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Number of whole grains per panicle according to the cultivated municipality (a) and cultivar (b). Means followed by the same letters are not statistically different (Tukey P &lt; 0.05)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2602204x6.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Number of whole grains per panicle of rice upland according to the cultivar and doses of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (N-P-K)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Cultivars</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Doses of N-P-K (kg∙ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >00-00-00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30-40-30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60-60-60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90-90-90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120-100-120</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ecco</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.9 aA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.1 bA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.3 bA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70.2 bA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.9 bA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AN Cambar&#225;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.7 aB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.7 aA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.9 aA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.01 aA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >104.6 aA</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Means followed by the same lower case letters in the columns and lines not statistically different (Tukey P &lt; 0.05).</p><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Number of whole grains per panicle of upland rice in according of the environment crop and doses of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (N-P-K)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Municipalities</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Doses of N-P-K (kg∙ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >00-00-00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30-40-30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60-60-60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90-90-90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120-100-120</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cerejeiras</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.4 aA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.6 aA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.1 bA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.4 bA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.5 bA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vilhena</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.3 aB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.1aB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.1 aA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.8 aA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103.79 aA</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Means followed by the same lower case letters in the columns and lines not statistically different (Tukey P &lt; 0.05).</p><p>ence between the municipalities was much more relevant.</p><p>For <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, it can be noted that there is no interaction between any of the factors studied to 1000 grain weight, with only the cultivar and the environment interfered this characteristic. The municipality of Vilhena was responsible for the largest weight of 1000 grains (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a)) and cultivar Ecco performed better, compared with AN Cambara (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b)). Thus, there is the Ecco despite the lower number of whole grains per panicle observed compared to AN Cambara (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(b)), produces heavier grains and has a smaller loss of grain due to fewer previously reported sterile grains (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>).</p><p>As for productivity, this was significantly influenced by the type of the cultivar, the environment and fertilization. The interaction was significant for cultivar &#215; fertilization and environment &#215; fertilization. As there was no interaction cultivar &#215; environment, is presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> the productivity in function of municipalities and cultivars separately. The highest yield was obtained in the municipality of Cerejeiras (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a)) and</p><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> Number of sterile grains per panicle rice upland depending on cultivar and growing environment</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Cultivars</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Municipalities</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cerejeiras</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vilhena</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ecco</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.3100 bB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.8279 bA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AN Cambar&#225;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.4817 aB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.7550 aA</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Means followed by the same lower case letters in the columns and lines not statistically different (Tukey P &lt; 0.05).</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Weight of 1000 grains (g) per panicle according to the municipality grown (a) and of the cultivar (b). Means followed by the same letters are not statistically different (Tukey P &lt; 0.05)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2602204x7.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Productivity of rice grains upland according to the cultivated municipality (a) and cultivar (b). Means followed by the same letters are not statistically different (Tukey P &lt; 0.05)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-2602204x8.png"/></fig><p>cultivar Ecco was more productive, surpassing 1230 kg∙ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> AN Cambara (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b)). This higher produc- tivity can be explained by the fact that cultivate it showed a higher tillering, associated with fewer sterile grains per panicle and higher 1000 grain weight, which probably outweigh the fewer whole grains presented by this cultivar.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref> shows the interaction cultivar x fertilizer for grain yield. You can see that the productivity of Ecco was higher than AN Cambar&#225; in all tested fertilization. Individually, for the AN Cambara, there was no signifi- cant difference between treatments 00-00-00, 30-40-30 and 30-40-30 or between, 60-60-60 and 90-90-90, but with hybrid Ecco was significant difference between treatment 00-00-00, 30-40-30 and 60-60-60, demonstrating that this cultivar showed better responsiveness maids fertilization. As shown by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59513-ref8">8</xref>] , the hybrid ECOO is charac- terized by an excellent root development.</p><p>Remember that the global demand for food is expected to double in the coming decades, pressing farming systems to increase their productivity, and much of this increase will come from developing countries such as Brazil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59513-ref14">14</xref>] . Thus, the selection of cultivars with desirable agronomic characteristics which have greater re- sistance to environmental changes and have higher capacity utilization of the applied inputs, is of fundamental importance in view of the growing scarcity of natural resources.</p><p>It is observed from <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0 that only on 00-00-00 and 30-40-30 treatments had significant difference between the municipalities of Cerejeiras and Vilhena, and with higher doses of N-P-K, the yields were similar. According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59513-ref15">15</xref>] , proper fertilization can increase by up to 40% upland rice productivity in the cerrado soils, if other factors are not limiting. In the case of this study, the increase in productivity due to the higher dose of N-P-K compared to control (00-00-00) was 155% for Ecco and 142% for the AN Cambara.</p><p>As for the performance of whole grains in Cerejeiras the hybrid Ecco was higher than AN Cambara. In Vilhena was the reverse, with the AN Cambar&#225; getting higher yield of whole grains (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>1). Note also that individually for Ecco the municipality interfered significantly in yield of whole, with best results observed in Cerejeiras, while for the AN Cambar&#225; the means were statistically similar in both cities.</p><p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>2, it is observed that in general, the averages in the municipality of Cerejeiras were higher than the municipality of Vilhena. However, it appears that the N-P-K doses did not affect the yield of whole grains alone within each municipality.</p><table-wrap id="table9" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref></label><caption><title> Productivity of grains of rice upland according on the cultivar and doses of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (N-P-K)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Cultivars</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Doses of N-P-K (kg∙ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >00-00-00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30-40-30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60-60-60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90-90-90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120-100-120</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ecco</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1821.04 aD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2737 aC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3612.05 aB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4022.5 aAB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4637.58 aA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AN Cambar&#225;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1283.37 bC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1864 bBC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2150.5 bB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2282.90 bB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3101.25 bA</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Means followed by the same lower case letters in the columns and lines not statistically different (Tukey P &lt; 0.05).</p><table-wrap id="table10" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0</label><caption><title> Productivity of grains of rice upland according to the cultivation environment and doses of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (N-P-K)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Municipalities</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Doses of N-P-K (kg∙ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >00-00-00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30-40-30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60-60-60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90-90-90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120-100-120</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cerejeiras</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2119 aC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2668.5 aBC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3009.5 aB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3187.7 aAB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3888 aA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vilhena</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >985.42 bD</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1932.5 bC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2753.1 aB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3117.7 aAB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3850.8 aA</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Means followed by the same lower case letters in the columns and lines not statistically different (Tukey P &lt; 0.05).</p><table-wrap id="table11" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>1</label><caption><title> Yield of whole grain on the upland rice according on the cultivar and growing environment</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Cultivars</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Municipalities</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cerejeiras</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vilhena</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ecco</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.4 aA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.1 bB</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AN Cambar&#225;</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.07 bA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.95 aA</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Means followed by the same lower case letters in the columns and lines not statistically different (Tukey P &lt; 0.05).</p><table-wrap id="table12" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>2</label><caption><title> Yield of whole grain on the upland rice according of the growing environment and doses of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (N-P-K)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Municipalities</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Doses of N-P-K (kg∙ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >00-00-00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30-40-30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60-60-60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90-90-90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120-100-120</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cerejeiras</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.25 aA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.75 aA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.12 aA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.92 aA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.12 aA</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vilhena</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55 bA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.62 bA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.87 aA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.12 bA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.5 bA</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Means followed by the same lower case letters in the columns and lines not statistically different (Tukey P &lt;0.05).</p><p>In the municipality of Cerejeiras, the soil has a higher cation exchange capacity (CTC) and higher organic matter content, as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59513-ref16">16</xref>] , soils with higher organic matter content and CTC greater than 60 mmol dm-3 are more effective in retaining water and nutrients. According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59513-ref17">17</xref>] Crusciol in addition to the genetic factor, which influences the loss of grain quality are the periods of water stress that the plant pass during the cycle. Thus, probably, this greater efficiency in water and nutrient retention probably resulted in better performance of whole grains as a function of fertilizers employed in this municipality (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>2).</p><p>The best response to fertilization employed observed in the hybrid Ecco, associated with higher yield of whole grains, are quite relevant factors, due to higher economic return afforded to the producer.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>The hybrid Ecco has higher tillering ability of the AN Cambara and presents fewer sterile grains per panicle, heavier 1000 grains and hence greater productivity.</p><p>For both cultivars, the highest productivity is obtained with a dose of 120-100-120 kg∙ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> N-P-K. For the Ecco, the productivity is achieved with this dose and the dose of 90-90-90 kg∙ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> is statistically similar.</p><p>There is no difference in productivity between the municipalities when the dose of N-P-K is less than 60-60- 60 kg∙ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>.</p><p>The highest yield of whole grains in function of N-P-K fertilization is obtained in Cerejeiras.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecu&#225;ria (EMBRAPA), the Rack―Industry and Trade of Rice Ltda. (RICAL<sup>&#174;</sup>) and the RiceTec<sup>&#174;</sup>.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Edimar RodriguesSoares,RoberttFernandes,La&#233;rcio daSilva Londero,LeandroGalon,FabianaFerreira Pires,Marcelo deAndrade Barbosa,Diego Lopesdos Santos,Samara CristinaSampaio Correa,Everton AugustoSampaio Correa,Remy Carvalhodos Santos, (2015) Fertilization with Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium in Upland Rice Cultivars in the Southern Region of Rond&#244;nia, Brazil. American Journal of Plant Sciences,06,2263-2271. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2015.614229</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.59513-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fageria, N.K. and Oliveira, J.P. (2014) Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Interactions in Upland Rice. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 37, 1586-1600. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2014.920362</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59513-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guimar&amp;atilde;es, C.M. (2006) Rice Cultivation in Brazil. 2th Edition, Embrapa Arroz e Feij&amp;atilde;o, Santo Ant&amp;ocirc;nio de Goiás.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59513-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fageria, N.K. and Baligar, V.C. (2001) Improving Nutrient Use Efficiency of Annual Crops in Brazilian Acid Soils for Sustainable Crop Production. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 32, 1303-1319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/CSS-100104114</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59513-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">CONAB—Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento (2013) Brasilian Crop Assessment: Grains, Twelfth Assessment, September.http://www.conab.gov.br/OlalaCMS/uploads/arquivos/13_10_16_14_32_01_boletim_ingles_-_setembro_2013.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59513-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">EMBRAPA—Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (2012) http://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/69387/1/seriedocumentos-268.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59513-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gitti, D.C., Arf, O., Portugal, J.R., Corsini, D.C.D.C, Rodrigues, R.A.F. and Kaneco, F.H. (2013) Cover Crops, Nitrogen Rates and Seeds Inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense in Upland Rice under No-Tillage. Bragantia, 71, 509-517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87052013005000002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59513-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">CONAB—Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento (2014) Brasilian Crop Assessment: Grains, Eleventh Survey Assessment, August. http://www.conab.gov.br/OlalaCMS/uploads/arquivos/14_08_07_08_59_54_boletim_graos_agosto_2014.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59513-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Soares, E.R., Baseggio, E.A., Londrero, L.S., Correa, S.C.S., Rossini, V.P., Zo-linger, I.T, Klahold, C.A. and Galon, L. (2010) Production and Productivity Components of Hybrid Rice Dry Com-Pared to Conventional Three Cultivars. Acta Agronómica, 59, 435-441.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59513-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Soares, E.R., Robertt, F., Londero, L.S., Santos, D.L., Correa, S.C.S., Correa, E.A.S., Santos, R.C., Gomes, A.P, Galon, L., Pires, F.F and Gonalves, S.S. (2014) Agronomic Performance of Cultivars of Upland Rice in the Southern of the Region of Rond&amp;ocirc;nia, Brazil. Agricultural Sciences, 5, 513-518. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/as.2014.56053</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59513-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nascente</surname><given-names> A.S. Kluthcouski</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> J.</surname><given-names> Rabelo</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> R.R.</surname><given-names> Oliveira</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> P.</surname><given-names> Cobucci</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> T. and Crusciol</surname><given-names> C.A.C. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2011</year>)<article-title>Upland Rice Cultivars Development and Yield Regarding Soil Management</article-title><source> Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical</source><volume> 41</volume>,<fpage> 186</fpage>-<lpage>192</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59513-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Silva, V.A.C., Silva, E.F. and Tabosa, J.N. (2010) Performance of Upland Rice Genotypes in “Zona da Mata” of Pernambuco State. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 14, 1030-1037. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662010001000002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59513-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Furlan, D.N., Nunes, D.D, Silva, J.M. da, Lobato, L.C.H., Lima, T.R., Assun&amp;atilde;o, A.G. de. and Pinto, G.C. (2013) Climate and Soybean Yields in the Municipalities of Cherry and Vilhena Located in the Southern Cone of Rond?nia. http://www.cbmet.com/cbm-files/14-9e178324fe343881898c4f98651b1a7d.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59513-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pimentel-Gomes, F. (2009) Statistics Course Experimental. 15th Edition, FEALQ, Piracicaba.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59513-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Baudron, F. and Ken, E.G. (2014) Agriculture and Nature: Trouble and Strife? Biological Conservation, 170, 232-245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59513-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Santos, A.B., Stone, L.F., Fageria, N.K., Prabhu, A.S., Mah, M.G.C., Aquino, A.R.L., Ajimura, G.M., Barbosa Filho, M.P., Zimmermann, F.J.P., Carvalho, J.R.P., Oliveira, A.B. and Silveira Filho, A. (1982) Effect of Different Technology Combinations of Upland Rice Production System. PAB, 17, 835-845.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59513-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lopes, A.S. and Guimar&amp;atilde;es Guilherme, L.R. (2004) Interpretation of Analysis of Soil. Concepts and Applications, National Association for Diffusion of Fertilizers (ANDA). http://www.anda.org.br/multimidia/boletim_02.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59513-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Crusciol, C.A.C, Machado, J.R., Arf, O. and Rodrigues, R.A.F. (1999) Percentage of Undamaged Grains and Hulling Yield of Dryland Rice as Affected by Row and Plant Population. Scientia Agricola, 56, 47-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90161999000100008</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>