<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">MSCE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-6045</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/msce.2015.39002</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">MSCE-59464</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Resin Characterization and Tubular Membrane Transport with Single Gases for Ethyl Lactate Separations for Industrial Purposes
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>didiong</surname><given-names>Okon</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Habiba</surname><given-names>Shehu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ngozi</surname><given-names>Nwogu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mohammed</surname><given-names>Kajama</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ifeyinwa</surname><given-names>Orakwe</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Edward</surname><given-names>Gobina</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Center for Process Integration and Membrane Technology (CPIMT), School of Engineering, The Robert Gordon
University, Aberdeen, UK</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>09</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>8</fpage><lpage>14</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>17</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>5</month>	<year>September</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>8</day>	<month>September</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The dip-coating method has been used to prepare silica membrane. The gas flow rate relationship with the gauge pressure showed a Knudsen type of mechanism of gas transport. The flux was found to decrease with respect to temperature indicating non-activation mechanism of transport through the membrane. The order of the gas kinetic diameter with respect to the gas flow rate was He &gt; Ar &gt; CO
  <sub>2</sub> &gt; N
  <sub>2</sub> confirming a molecular sieving mechanism of gas transport. The characterisation of the resin catalysts was carried out using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The SEM morphology of the Amberlyst 16 resin catalysts showed a defect-free surface before esterification process. Amberlyst 15 catalyst exhibited some defect on the surface indicating a lower resistance to lactic acid and decomposition at higher temperature after the esterification process at 60
  &amp;degC. The order of the gas viscosity with respect to the gas flux was N
  <sub>2</sub> &gt; Ar &gt; CO
  <sub>2</sub> &gt; He.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Esterification</kwd><kwd> Resin Characterisation</kwd><kwd> Transport Mechanism</kwd><kwd> Ethyl Lactate and Permeability</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>New technology has emerged in order to improve the ethyl lactate through the esterification of acid and ethanol using pervaporation membrane process and reactive distillation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59464-ref1">1</xref>] . Lactic acid esterification reaction is a reversible reaction in nature; hence, the conversion of lactic acid is limited by equilibrium [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59464-ref2">2</xref>] . In order to obtain a high yield of the ester, different methods have been suggested including introducing more of the alcohol to the reaction and increasing the temperature and also employing a catalytic ceramic membrane which will help to shift the equilibrium to the product side by selective removal of water. Although the traditional method of solving equilibrium problems in esterification reactions involves the addition of an excess amount of alcohol to the reaction system, using a membrane can result in higher conversion by shifting the chemical equilibrium towards the formation of the product by in-situ removal of water from the reaction mixture [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59464-ref3">3</xref>] . Membrane-based separation technologies have been successfully employed over the years in several industrial applications including food, biotechnology, pharmaceutical and in the treatment of industrial effluents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59464-ref4">4</xref>] . Membranes have also replaced a lot of conventional technologies because of the following advantages including: reliability, simple to operate, absence of moving parts and ability to tolerate fluctuations in flow rate and feed composition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59464-ref4">4</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59464-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>Compared to other membranes, ceramic membranes have more thermal, mechanical and chemical stability. Gas transport through inorganic membranes is more complex in contrast to polymeric membranes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59464-ref6">6</xref>] . Materials including SiO<sub>2</sub>, Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, ZrO<sub>2</sub> and TiO<sub>2</sub> are the most frequently used materials for ceramic membranes. Inorganic membranes can be prepared using different methods including sol-gel, sintering, chemical deposition and dip- coating methods [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59464-ref7">7</xref>] . Generally the conventional dip-coating process involves two major steps: support dipping and support withdrawal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59464-ref8">8</xref>] . The suitability of a ceramic membrane depends on the membrane selectivity and permeability [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59464-ref9">9</xref>] . However, gas transport through porous ceramic membrane can be explained using different mechanism of transport including surface diffusion, capillary condensation, viscous flow, molecular sieving and Knudsen diffusion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59464-ref10">10</xref>] . Viscous flow occurs if the pore radius of the membrane is larger than the mean free path of the permeating gas molecule; in this case more collision will take place between gas molecule than with the pore walls of the membrane. Knudsen diffusion mechanism also occurs if the mean free path (λ) of the permeating gas molecule is greater than pore diameter (d). This indicates that the Knudsen number (K) is greater than 1, i.e. K = λ/d ˃ 1 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59464-ref11">11</xref>] . Molecular sieving occurs when the diameter of the gas molecule is very close to that of the pores of the membrane. In capillary condensation mechanism, separation can takes place in the pores of the membrane with mesoporous layer in the presence of condensable gas specie [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59464-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59464-ref12">12</xref>] . Surface diffusion mechanism enables permeation rate relative to Knudsen diffusion in such a way that the gas is strongly adsorbed on the pore wall of the membrane [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59464-ref13">13</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental</title><p>The four gases used for the carrier gas permeation tests include: nitrogen (N<sub>2</sub>), argon (Ar), helium (He) and carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>). The gases were supplied by BOC, UK. The permeation test was carried out at the feed pressure drop of 0.10 - 1.00 bar and at 393 K. The membrane support was dip-coated twice before the permeation analysis. The effective length of the membrane was 36.6 cm, while the inner and outer radius of the membrane was 7 and 10 mm respectively. The support modification process was carried out based on the procedure developed by Gobina (2006) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59464-ref14">14</xref>] . <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows the single gas permeation setup [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59464-ref15">15</xref>] . The surface morphology of the Amberlyst 15 and Amberlyst 16 resin catalysts was examined using the Zeiss EVO LS10 Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) at the magnification of 10 μm and 100 μm respectively.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Result and Discussion</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows the relationship between flow rate (mol∙s<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) and feed gauge pressure (bar) at 393 K. From <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, it can be seen that the gas flow increase with feed pressure at 393 K. Gases with the higher molecular weight exhibited low flow rate indicating Knudsen flow mechanism.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> shows the relationship between the gas flux and the inverse of viscosity of the gases. It was observed that Ar (17.81) and N<sub>2</sub> (15) with the least viscosity values exhibited a higher flux in contrast to CO<sub>2</sub> (22.7) and He (20) gases. Although Ar and CO<sub>2</sub> gas viscosity are not close but they exhibited almost the same flux. It was suggested that there could have been some contribution of viscous flow mechanism of transport.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> shows the relationship between the gas flow rate and the gas kinetic diameter at 393 K and at 0.80 bar gauge pressure. From <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>, it was found that the He and CO<sub>2</sub> gas with the least kinetic diameter of 2.65 &#197; and 3.30 &#197; respectively, showed a higher flow rate than Ar and N<sub>2</sub> gas with the higher kinetic diameter of 3.40 &#197; and 3.64 &#197; respectively indicating molecular sieving mechanism of gas transport through the membrane.</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Single gas experimental setup [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59464-ref15">15</xref>] </title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740203x6.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Flow rate (mol∙s<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) against gauge pressure (bar)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740203x7.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Gas flux (mol∙m<sup>−</sup><sup>2</sup>∙s<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) against 1/viscosity (Pa∙s<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) at 0.70 bar at 393 K</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740203x8.png"/></fig><p>The permeability of the membrane was calculated to determine pore size and the mean free path of the gases through the membrane as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. From <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, the results obtained showed that the membrane pore radius for the gases was all smaller than the mean free path, indicating Knudsen mechanism of transport. This results corroborate with a report by Benito et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59464-ref16">16</xref>] , that Knudsen diffusion is the dominate mechanism, if the membrane pore radius is smaller than the mean free path of the molecules.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(b) present the SEM images of the resin catalysts before and after the esterification. The surfaces of Amberlyst 16 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(a)) and Amberlyst 15 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(b)) before the esterification reaction was expected to show a smooth surface. Marginal defect observed on the surface of the commercial Amberlyst 15 would probably have originated from the sulphonic acid group in which solid catalyst is made up of thereby indicating a strong catalytic effect. A similar result was obtained by Zhang et al [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59464-ref17">17</xref>] . From <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(c) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(d), it was observed that the two catalysts exhibited cracks on the surface after the esterification process although that of the Amberlyst 16 was not very pronounced. This was suggested to be the effect of temperature on the polymeric material after the esterification process. From <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>(d); Amberlyst 15 catalyst showed a less mechanical effect. It was also observed that this catalyst cannot withstand the applied forces of high concentrations of lactic acid from the esterification reaction. It was also observed that Amberlyst 15 exhibited less thermal stability and less resistance at 60˚C indicating that it can decompose easily at higher temperatures. However, Amberlyst 16 was found to be more stable compared to Amberlyst 15 catalyst.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> shows the relationship between the gas flux (mol∙m<sup>−</sup><sup>2</sup>∙s<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) and temperature (˚C) at 393 K. It can be seen from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> that the gas flux does not change significantly with temperature. It was suggested that this may be due to transport of He gas diffusing faster through the pores of the silica membrane as the temperature increases in contrast to other gases. CO<sub>2</sub>, N<sub>2 </sub>and Ar gas flow decrease continuously with increase in temperature confirming Knudsen type mechanism on the silica membrane at higher gauge pressure range 0.5 bar.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> depicts the relationship between the gas permeance and the inverse square root of the gas molecular weight at 0.60 bar and 373 K. The experiments were performed in duplicate for repeatability. In Knudsen mechanism, the gas permeance must be directly proportional to the inverse square root of the gas molecular weight. From the result obtained in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>, it was found that although Ar, N<sub>2 </sub>and CO<sub>2</sub> did fit well to the line through the origin, He was observed to deviate from the other gases. Helium transport through the silica is based on a combination of activated and Knudsen mechanisms which explains its deviation from the inverse square root law with permeance. A similar result was also obtained in our previous study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59464-ref15">15</xref>] .</p><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Flow rate (mol∙s<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) against kinetic diameter (&#197;) at 0.80 bar and 393 K</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740203x9.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Calculated values of the pore size, mean free and permeability of the four gases</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Gas molecule</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean free path (λ) m</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pore radius (m)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Permeability (mol∙mm<sup>−2</sup>∙s<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>∙Pa<sup>−1</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ar</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.15E−04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.72E−12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.258E−08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >He</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.63E−04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.09E−11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.253E−08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.96E−04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.45E−12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.425E−08</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.11E−04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.22E−12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.380E−08</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig-group id="fig5"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> (a) (Amberlyst 16), (b) (Amberlyst 15), (c) (Amberlyst 14) and (d) (Amberlyst 15): SEM surface morphology of the resin catalysts before and after esterification reaction at 60˚C.</title></caption><fig id ="fig5_1"><label> (b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740203x10.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig5_2"><label>(c)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740203x11.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig5_3"><label> (d)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740203x12.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig5_4"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740203x13.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Flux (mol∙m<sup>−</sup><sup>2</sup>∙s<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) against temperature (˚C) at 0.50 bar</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740203x14.png"/></fig><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> Permeance (mol∙m<sup>−</sup><sup>2</sup>∙s<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>∙Pa<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) against inverse square root of gas molecular weight at 0.60 bar and 393 K</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/2-1740203x15.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>The morphological characterisation using SEM and gas transport of tubular membrane with single gases before ethyl lactate separations has been investigated. The Amberlyst 16 reins catalysts showed defect-free surface before the esterification processes. Amberlyst 15 exhibited a serious crack on the surface after esterification processes. Amberlyst 16 catalyst was found to be more stable to heat at the esterification temperature of 60˚C in contrast to Amberlyst 15. The membrane exhibited a molecular sieving and Knudsen type flow mechanism with some contribution of viscous flow mechanism. Ar, N<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> gases showed a linear proportionality with inverse square root of molecular weight. He gas showed a deviation from the inverse square root law with permeance. The membrane pore radii for the gases were all smaller than the mean free path.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The Authors acknowledge the Centre for Process Integration and Membrane Technology (CPIMT), School of Engineering, RGU for providing the membrane and also the School of Pharmacy and life Sciences RGU for the SEM images.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>EdidiongOkon,HabibaShehu,NgoziNwogu,MohammedKajama,IfeyinwaOrakwe,EdwardGobina, (2015) Resin Characterization and Tubular Membrane Transport with Single Gases for Ethyl Lactate Separations for Industrial Purposes. Journal of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering,03,8-14. doi: 10.4236/msce.2015.39002</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.59464-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vu, D.T., Lira, C.T., Asthana, N.S., Kolah, A.K. and Miller, D.J. (2006) Vapor-Liquid Equilibria in the Systems Ethyl Lactate Ethanol and Ethyl Lactate Water. Journal of Chemical &amp; Engineering Data, 51, 1220-1225.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/je050537y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59464-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rattanaphanee, P. (2010) Factorial Design of Experiments for Comparative Study of Lactic Acid Esterification with Ethanol and n-Butanol. 2010 International Conference on Chemistry and Chemical Engineering (ICCCE), 1-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICCCENG.2010.5560348</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59464-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ameri, E., Moheb, A. and Roodpeyma, S. (2010) Vapor-Permeation-Aided Esterification of Isopropanol/Propionic Acid Using NaA and PERVAP 2201 Membranes. Chemical Engineering Journal, 162, 355-363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.05.018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59464-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Labropoulos, A., Athanasekou, C., Kakizis, N., Sapalidis, A., Pilatos, G., Romanos, G., et al. (2014) Experimental Investigation of the Transport Mechanism of Several Gases during the CVD Post-Treatment of Nanoporous Membranes. Chemical Engineering Journal, 255, 377-393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.06.069</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59464-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Clarizia</surname><given-names> G. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2009</year>)<article-title>Strong and Weak Points of Membrane Systems Applied to Gas Separation</article-title><source> Chemical Engineering Transactions</source><volume> 17</volume>,<fpage> 1675</fpage>-<lpage>1680</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59464-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lee, H., Suda, H. and Haraya, K. (2005) Gas Permeation Properties in a Composite Mesoporous Alumina Ceramic Membrane. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 22, 721-728. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02705789</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59464-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mulder, M. (1996) Basic Principles of Membrane Technology. 2nd Edition, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1766-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59464-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhu, J., Fan, Y. and Xu, N. (2011) Modified Dip-Coating Method for Preparation of Pinhole-Free Ceramic Membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 367, 14-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2010.10.024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59464-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Uchytil, P., Schramm, O. and Seidel-Morgenstern, A. (2000) Influence of the Transport Direction on Gas Permeation in Two-Layer Ceramic Membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 170, 215-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(99)00370-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59464-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pandey, P. and Chauhan, R. (2001) Membranes for Gas Separation. Progress in Polymer Science, 26, 853-893. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00009-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59464-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sidhu, P.S. and Cussler, E. (2001) Diffusion and Capillary Flow in Track-Etched Membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 182, 91-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(00)00546-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59464-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Javaid, A. (2005) Membranes for Solubility-Based Gas Separation Applications. Chemical Engineering Journal, 112, 219-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2005.07.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59464-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lee, D. and Oyama, S.T. (2002) Gas Permeation Characteristics of a Hydrogen Selective Supported Silica Membrane. Journal of Membrane Science, 210, 291-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(02)00389-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59464-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gobina, E. (2006) Apparatus and Method for Separating Gases. United State Patent. Patent No.: US 7,048,778 B2. Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, 1-12.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59464-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Edidiong, O., Habiba, S., Mohammed, K., Ngozi, N., Ifeyinwa, O. and Gobina, E. (2015) Cation-Exchange Resin Characterisation and Carrier Gas Performance with Mesoporous Silica Membranes for Ethyl Lactate Separation. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, 4, 465-467. http://dx.doi.org/10.17577/ijertv4is040606</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59464-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Benito, J., Conesa, A., Rubio, F. and Rodriguez, M. (2005) Preparation and Characterization of Tubular Ceramic Mem- branes for Treatment of Oil Emulsions. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 25, 1895-1903. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2004.06.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59464-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, Y., Ma, L. and Yang, J. (2004) Kinetics of Esterification of Lactic Acid with Ethanol Catalyzed by Cation- Exchange Resins. Reactive and Functional Polymers, 61, 101-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2004.04.003</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>