<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">EPE</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Energy and Power Engineering</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1949-243X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/epe.2015.79040</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">EPE-59071</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Engineering</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  High Molecular Permeance Dual-Layer Ceramic Membrane for Capturing CO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; from Flue Gas Stream
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>gozi</surname><given-names>C. Nwogu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mohammed</surname><given-names>N. Kajama</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ifeyinwa</surname><given-names>Orakwe</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Edward</surname><given-names>Gobina</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Centre for Process Integration and Membrane Technology, (CPIMT), School of Engineering, The Robert Gordon
University, Aberdeen, United Kingdom</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>e.gobina@rgu.ac.uk(EG)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>08</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>418</fpage><lpage>425</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>18</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>22</month>	<year>August</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>25</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  With the objective to create technologically advanced materials to be scientifically applicable, dual-layer silica alumina membranes were molecularly fabricated by continuous surface coating silica layers containing hybrid material onto a ceramic porous substrate for flue gas separation applications. The dual-layer silica alumina membrane was prepared by dip coating technique be-fore further drying in an oven at elevated temperature. The effects of substrate physical appear-ance, coating quantity, cross-linking agent, number of coatings and testing conditions on gas separation performance of the membrane have been investigated. Scanning electron microscope was used to investigate the development of coating thickness. The membrane shows impressive perm selectivity especially for CO
  <sub>2</sub> and N
  <sub>2</sub> binary mixture representing a stimulated flue gas stream.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Gas Separation</kwd><kwd> Silica Membrane</kwd><kwd> Separation Factor</kwd><kwd> Membrane Layer Thickness</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Constrained by the increasing reliance on fossil fuels, the rising utilization of coal-burning power plants discharges huge amounts of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere resulting in global warming, a worldwide environmental concern. Flue gas from fossil fuel power plants has been identified as the main contributor to carbon dioxide emission. The major human related sources of CO<sub>2</sub> are burning of fossil fuels and cement manufacture. Some uses of fossil fuel are in the generation of energy, transportation and heating system. The bulk of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere can be curtailed by regulating the rate at which gases are being emitted [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59071-ref1">1</xref>] . In addition, development of advanced techniques to mitigate these emissions has been suggested by some researchers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59071-ref2">2</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59071-ref4">4</xref>] . A number of methods have been acknowledged to separate the CO<sub>2</sub> from flue gas mixture. This includes absorption, adsorption, cryogenic distillation and membrane technology. Absorption of carbon dioxide via amine based solvent remains the leading process, particularly in large scale processes. However, membrane is a developing technology and holds great potentials for bulk gas separation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59071-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59071-ref5">5</xref>] . CO<sub>2</sub> separation by absorption using monoethanolamine (MEA) solvent is well known to be too costly. In addition, cryogenic separation of CO<sub>2</sub> is energy intensive due to reheating and cooling [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59071-ref6">6</xref>] . Membrane separation of CO<sub>2</sub> from flue gas however offers excellent separation due to its inherent features which are favourable in gas separation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59071-ref1">1</xref>] . In order to contend with other technologies, a membrane with good power-driven strengths and gas separation performance is necessary. Excessive interest in membrane-based gas separations, refining and catalytic application has been investigated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59071-ref7">7</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59071-ref10">10</xref>] . Most of the separation applications have focused on the Knudsen region, however, it is necessary to improve the pore structure due to the low gas selectivity in the Knudsen region. In this study, the design of single and binary gas selectivity and permeability characteristics of a multi-layer silica alumina ceramic membrane were investigated as a novel separation tool for a stimulated flue gas stream at room temperature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59071-ref11">11</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Basic Gas Separation Theory</title><p>In IUPAC commendations and categorizations, gas transport and pore diameter of porous ceramic membranes are closely interrelated [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59071-ref11">11</xref>] . Notably, micro-porous membranes have pore diameter less than 2 nm. As a result, molecular sieving effect is highly predominant. Mesopore with pore diameter between 2 nm and 50 nm are governed by Knudsen/multilayer diffusion. Macropores have large pores greater than 50nm and viscous flow, in this case results in no separation. Furthermore, Capillary condensation and surface multi-layer diffusion mechanisms are well known for high selectivity characteristics in mixed gas separations at relatively low temperature especially where the smaller pore or mesopores are designed.</p><p>Knudsen separation factor α<sub> </sub>for two single gases carbon dioxide and nitrogen can be calculated using Equation (1).</p><disp-formula id="scirp.59071-formula1435"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-6201844x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-6201844x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-6201844x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are the molecular weights of CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub> respectively.</p><p>Knudsen separation factor α for binary gases CO<sub>2</sub>, N<sub>2</sub> can be calculated using Equation (2) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59071-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><disp-formula id="scirp.59071-formula1436"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-6201844x9.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-6201844x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-6201844x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are the percentage concentrations of CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>.</p><p>The separation system is however established on the different permeability of the different chemical gaseous compounds through the membrane and is achieved by the application at varying pressures.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Experimental</title><p>The objective of this experiment is to develop a high molecular dual-layer silica alumina membrane through a dip coating, thereby determining the intrinsic selectivity of the 6000 nm ceramic support selected for the fabrication purpose. This will further demonstrate the ability of the membrane to separate CO<sub>2</sub> from flue gas mixtures. The expectation is that the modification will favour CO<sub>2</sub> even though it has a higher molecular weight than N<sub>2</sub>. A fresh support is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> which is then immersed in the silica solution as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. The membrane substrate is immersed in the silica solution repeatedly and the gas transport measured after each dip.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> depicts a picture of the gas transport test permeation system. The multi-layer silica ceramic membrane was held in a stainless steel reactor. At each end, graphite seals were held tight on the tube side. The gases used were carbon dioxide and nitrogen (with a purity of at least 99.9%) and a mixture of 14% carbon dioxide with the balance of nitrogen, all delivered by BOC (UK).</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Fresh support</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-6201844x12.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Sequential dip-coating of the membrane support gas transport test</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-6201844x13.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Apparatus set up</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-6201844x14.png"/></fig>Membrane Characterization<p>The morphology of the membrane before and after coating was studied with the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) measurement as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>. The adsorption and desorption isotherms of N<sub>2</sub> at 77 K were measured using a Gas Sorption Analyser. Before measurements, the membranes were crushed into fine particles and degassed at a high temperature of about 300˚C. Brunauer-Emmet-Teller, the pore volumes were measured at a relative pressure of P/P<sub>0</sub> = 1, assuming all accessible pores to be filled with condensed nitrogen.</p><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> SEM Image of support before modification</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-6201844x15.png"/></fig><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> SEM Image of the dual-layer membrane</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-6201844x16.png"/></fig><p>The surface areas were also obtained accordingly. A pictorial view of the Gas Sorption Analyser used is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Results and Discussion</title><p>An analysis of the adsorption and desorption curves for membrane pore size distribution were estimated using the method given by Barrett et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59071-ref12">12</xref>] and shows the nitrogen adsorption isotherms in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> respectively. The isotherms measured for the membranes are classified as Type IV isotherms according to the IUPAC classification [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59071-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59071-ref13">13</xref>] .</p><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Gas sorption analyser</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-6201844x17.png"/></fig><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> Graph of linear isotherm of gas adsorption and desorption for multi- layer membrane</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-6201844x18.png"/></fig><fig id="fig8"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig8">Figure 8</xref></label><caption><title> BJH method of desorption summary for pore diameter determination of the multi-layer membrane</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-6201844x19.png"/></fig><p>A plot of CO<sub>2</sub> and N<sub>2</sub> single gases permeance across the dual-layer silica ceramic membrane as function of gauge pressure is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref>. As can be observed, the gas permeance increased with pressure. CO<sub>2</sub> permeance was higher than that of nitrogen. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0 depicts single gas permselectivity compared to ideal Knudsen. Here, the experimental separation factor was higher than that of the ideal Knudsen, an indication of a very promising result which can be applied at industrial scale. Further investigations on binary gases were made as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1. Results obtained also gave good CO<sub>2</sub> recovery. An overall comparison of single and binary gases as demonstrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2 and confirms a membrane giving a higher CO<sub>2</sub> selectivity for binary mixture in comparison to single gases.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> BET summary</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Slope</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >782.459</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Intercept</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.477e+03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Correlation coefficient, r</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.000000</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C constant</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.316</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Surface Area</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.068 m<sup>2</sup>/g</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> BJH summary</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Surface Area</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.167 m<sup>2</sup>/g</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pore volume</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.033 cc/g</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pore diameter Dv (d)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.136 nm</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig9"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig9">Figure 9</xref></label><caption><title> Single gas permeance measurement as a function of gauge pressure dual-layer membrane at room temperature</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-6201844x20.png"/></fig><fig id="fig10"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>0</label><caption><title> Single gas perm selectivity and Ideal Knudsen relationship</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-6201844x21.png"/></fig><fig id="fig11"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>1</label><caption><title> Binary gas perm selectivity and Ideal Knudsen relationship</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-6201844x22.png"/></fig><fig id="fig12"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>2</label><caption><title> Combined perm selectivity measurement for both single gases and binary mixture</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-6201844x23.png"/></fig><p>In general, for both scenarios, a surface multi-layer diffusion mechanism known for high selectivity characteristics in single and mixed gas separations at relatively low temperature but high pressure occurs especially with smaller pores. A similar result obtained by some researcher [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59071-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59071-ref15">15</xref>] and their result are in good agreement with the present study.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>A dual-layer silica membrane was fabricated on macro porous alumina supports using a dip-coating technique. Single and mixed-gas permeation experiments indicate that the permeation characteristics of the fabricated membrane are governed by surface multilayer diffusion with small influence of Knudsen flow mechanism. The higher permeation rates for CO<sub>2</sub> compared to N<sub>2</sub> designate a mesoporous silica layer with an interconnected pore network. This conclusion is supported further by nitrogen adsorption measurements. SEM images of the dip- coated membrane indicate that the layer is approximately 2 μm thick and much more uniformly deposited directly on the surface of the alumina support. The dip-coated membranes prepared in this study favoured CO<sub>2</sub> gas in binary gas mixture and most importantly for flue gas separation application</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors wish to express their sincere thanks to the Centre for Process Integration and Membrane Technology of Robert Gordon University for procuring the fresh membrane used for the study and to the School of Life Sciences at The Robert Gordon University for SEM and EDXA observations.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Ngozi C.Nwogu,Mohammed N.Kajama,IfeyinwaOrakwe,EdwardGobina, (2015) High Molecular Permeance Dual-Layer Ceramic Membrane for Capturing CO<sub>2</sub> from Flue Gas Stream. Energy and Power Engineering,07,418-425. doi: 10.4236/epe.2015.79040</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.59071-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yildirim, Y. and Hughes, R. (2003) An Experimental Study of CO2 Separation Using a Silica Based Composite Membrane. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 81, 257-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1205/095758203322299789</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59071-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, H.Z., Xiao, Y.C. and Chung, T. (2011) Multi-Layer Composite Hollow Fiber Membranes Derived from Poly (Ethylene Glycol)(PEG) Containing Hybrid Materials for CO2/N2 Separation. Journal of Membrane Science, 381, 211-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.07.023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59071-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sá, S., Silva, H., Sousa, J.M. and Mendes, A. (2009) Hydrogen Production by Methanol Steam Reforming in a Membrane Reactor: Palladium vs Carbon Molecular Sieve Membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 339, 160-170.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.04.045</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59071-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shao, L., Low, B.T., Chung, T. and Greenberg, A.R. (2009) Polymeric Membranes for the Hydrogen Economy: Contemporary Approaches and Prospects for the Future. Journal of Membrane Science, 327, 18-31.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2008.11.019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59071-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, H., Xiao, Y. and Chung, T. (2010) Synthesis and Characterization of Poly (Ethylene Oxide) Containing Copolyimides for Hydrogen Purification. Polymer, 51, 4077-4086. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2010.06.046</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59071-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G&amp;ouml;ttlicher, G. and Pruschek, R. (1997) Comparison of CO2 Removal Systems for Fossil-Fuelled Power Plant Processes. Energy Conversion and Management, 38, S173-S178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(96)00265-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59071-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Keizer, K., Uhlhorn, R. and Burggraaf, A. (1988) Gas Separation Mechanisms in Microporous Modified γ-Al2O3 Membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 39, 285-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(00)80935-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59071-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">De Lange, R., Hekkink, J., Keizer, K. and Burggraaf, A. (1995) Permeation and Separation Studies on Microporous Sol-Gel Modified Ceramic Membranes. Microporous Materials, 4, 169-186.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0927-6513(95)00004-S</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59071-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brinker, C., Ward, T., Sehgal, R., Raman, N., Hietala, S., Smith, D., et al. (1993) “Ultramicroporous” Silica-Based Supported Inorganic Membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 77, 165-179.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(93)85067-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59071-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yildirim, Y., Gobina, E. and Hughes, R. (1997) An Experimental Evaluation of High-Temperature Composite Membrane Systems for Propane Dehydrogenation. Journal of Membrane Science, 135, 107-115.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(97)00133-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59071-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Keizer, K., Uhlhorn, R.J. and Burggraaf, T.J. (1995) Gas Separation Using Inorganic Membranes. Membrane Science and Technology, 2, 553-588. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0927-5193(06)80014-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59071-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sing, K.S. (1985) Reporting Physisorption Data for Gas/Solid Systems with Special Reference to the Determination of Surface Area and Porosity (Recommendations 1984). Pure and Applied Chemistry, 57, 603-619.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1351/pac198557040603</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59071-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Smart, S., Liu, S., Serra, J.M., Diniz da Costa, J.C., Iulianelli, A. and Basile, A. (2013) 8—Porous Ceramic Membranes for Membrane Reactors. In: Basile, A., Ed., Handbook of Membrane Reactors, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, 298-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1533/9780857097330.2.298</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59071-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gobina, E. (2006) Apparatus and Method for Separating Gases. U.S. Patent No. 7,048,778. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59071-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gobina, E. (2007) Apparatus and Method for Separating Gases. U.S. Patent No. 7,297,184. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>