<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AER</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Advances in Enzyme Research</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2328-4846</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/aer.2015.33006</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AER-59053</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  A Novel Exo-Glucanase Explored from a &lt;i&gt;Meyerozyma&lt;/i&gt; sp. Fungal Strain
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>sion-Wen</surname><given-names>Kuo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jia-Kun</surname><given-names>Zeng</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pi-Han</surname><given-names>Wang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Wen-Chin</surname><given-names>Chen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Life Sciences, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Environmental Engineering and Health, Yuanpei University of Medical Technology, Hsinchu, Taiwan</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>hwkuo@thu.edu.tw(SK)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>25</day><month>08</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>53</fpage><lpage>65</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>8</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>22</month>	<year>August</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>25</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Isolating cellulase-secreting microbes followed-by screening their cellulolytic activities has been an essential approach to discover novel and potential cellulases for cellulolytic industrial applications. This study was aimed to explore competitive exoglucanases by screening avicelase activities for 92 fungal strains isolated from environmental airborne-fungal-spore samples. Results showed that an isolated fungal strain numbered 58 exhibited the best avicelase activity of 0.209 U/mL when cultured for six days at pH 5.0 - 5.3 and 25℃ - 27℃, and was lately identified as a yeast strain of 
  Meyerozyma sp. (96% ITS fragment similar with 
  Meyerozyma caribbica, HG970748). Based on amino acid sequences revealed from LC/MS/MS, the target exoglucanase was identical to 1,4-beta-D-glucan cellobiohydrolases and was named 
  Mc-CBHI which had optimal avicelase reaction conditions of pH 5 and 70℃ and could remain fairly stable after 4hr incubation at acid conditions (pH 3 - 5) or wide temperature ranges (30℃ - 80℃). Additionally, the 
  Mc-CBHI (~70 kDa and ~3.6% of crude enzyme) had specific FPase and avicelase activities of 0.179 U/mg and 0.126 U/mg, respectively (which were about 40% - 50% activities of a commercial cellulase Accellerase-1000). These results demonstrated that the newly-found 
  Mc-CBHI could become one of potential exoglucanase resources for related cellulolytic industrial applications.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Airborne-Fungal-Spore</kwd><kwd> Exoglucanase</kwd><kwd> 1</kwd><kwd>4-Beta-D-Glucan Cellobiohydrolases</kwd><kwd> CBHI</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;Meyerozyma&lt;/i&gt; sp.</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Cellulose of ligno-biomass is one of the most abundant natural biopolymers for many industrial products (e.g., paper, rayon, filter membrane etc.) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref1">1</xref>] , and has been considered as a major raw material for renewable biofuel production as well [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref3">3</xref>] . Enzymatic hydrolysis of polymeric cellulose to monomeric sugar is a crucial step prior to sugar fermentation for renewable bioethanol production owing to slow reaction rate for complicate hydrolysis procedure coordinately-conducted by three types of cellulases, i.e., exo-glucanase (CBH) (EC 3.2.1.91 and 0.74), endo-glucanase (EG) (EC 3.2.1.4), and beta-glucosidase (BGL) (EC 3.2.1.21) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref4">4</xref>] . In order to enhance bioethanol production rate and reduce overall manufacture cost, scientific and engineering communities have continually explored novel or modified cellulases with better hydrolyzing activity and cheaper production cost although some promising cellulases are already commercially available up to now.</p><p>Some of recent strategies for improving cost, quality, and/or quantity of cellulases have been focused on increasing enzyme stability and/or functionality (by optimizing hydrolyzing conditions or modifying enzyme com- ponent and/or structure) or expediting enzyme production titer (by optimizing fermentation conditions, mutating cellulase-secreting microbial strains, or manipulating hyper-expressing system) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref5">5</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref6">6</xref>] . Besides, isolation of cellulase-secreting microbial strains followed-by screening their cellulases is still an essential approach to discover novel and potential cellulases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref7">7</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref9">9</xref>] . Several novel and potential cellulases have been continually discovered from some fungal strains (e.g., Schizochytrium aggregatum and Chaetomella raphigera) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref10">10</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref12">12</xref>] other than the most common cellulase producers such as Aspergillus sp., Penicillium sp., and Trichoderma sp. suggesting some highly-active cellulases might stay undiscovered in diverse fungal consortium.</p><p>Fungi are ubiquitous in diverse natural environments or even in residential home. Because of their unique feature to utilize polymeric cellulose in ligno-material as carbon and energy sources for their growth, most of potential cellulases have been explored by screening cellulosic activity for crude enzymes produced from fungal strains gathered and/or isolated from diverse lignocellulose-rich samples such as soil, compost, saw dust, straw dust, decaying wood, intestinal of insects, or feces of ruminants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref13">13</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref16">16</xref>] . Most of fungal strains isolated from such samples were mainly belonged to the common cellulase-producing fungi of Ascomycota phylum such as Aspergillus sp., Cladosporium sp., Fusarium sp., Penicillium sp., or Trichoderma sp. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref16">16</xref>] . Additionally, because most of fungi reproduce by forming spores, large amount of airborne fungal spores produced by micro- fungi grown on wood or plant debris could present in outdoor air throughout the year and most of them could be allergenic [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref17">17</xref>] ; whereas, some of them may germinate potential cellulase-secreting fungal strains as well. Nevertheless, fungal spores in air still have seldom been screened for cellulosic activities.</p><p>Besides, it has been suggested that hydrolyses activity for mixtures of different types of cellulases was higher than the sum of activities for each component acting alone, indicating the components were acting on cellulose synergistically [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref19">19</xref>] . For synergistic formulation of cellulases conducted in Taiwan, availability of indigenous exo-glucanase (or cellobiohydrolases, CBH) has been relatively less than endo-glucanase (EG) and beta- glucosidase (BGL). Searching novel and potential CBH for local or even global applications has been essential for bioethanol industrial. The research goal of this study was to screen and identify novel/potential exo-gluca- nase secreted by fungal strains isolated from environmental aerosol samples. Optimal reacting conditions and specific activities of newly-found exo-glucanase were also determined to evaluate its compatibility.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Sample Collection and Fungal Strain Isolation</title><p>Fungal spores were collected from several locations of central Taiwan area during July-December of 2011 by pumping air into 0.005% Triton-X100 buffer (at a flow rate of 300 L/min for 10 minutes) with a Coriolis<sup>&#174;</sup> μ Air Sampler (Bertin Technologies, France). Serially diluted air samples were spread on potato dextrose agar plate (PDA, Difco, USA) and incubated at 25˚C for fungal strain germination and isolation. Isolated fungal strains (numbered from #1 to #92 in this study) were stored at −20˚C for follow-up screening for potential cellulases.</p><p>Each of the isolated fungal strains or a benchmark strain of Trichoderma reesei from culture stocks were individually recovered by culturing on PDA plates at pH ~ 5.6 and room temperature ~ 27˚C; and then, a ~5 mm<sup>3</sup> 7-day-old mycelia block of each strain was re-cultured at pH ~ 5.3 and ~27˚C on modified MR plate (Mandel- Reese medium without peptone, MR-P) with 2% α-cellulose (each liter had 1.4 g (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>, 0.8 mL of 6 M urea, 2 g KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>, 0.34 g CaCl<sub>2</sub>, 0.3 g MgSO<sub>4</sub>∙7H<sub>2</sub>O, 0.00005 g FeSO<sub>4</sub>∙7H<sub>2</sub>O, 0.000016 g MnSO<sub>4</sub>∙7H<sub>2</sub>O, 0.000014 g ZnSO<sub>4</sub>∙7H<sub>2</sub>O, and 0.00002 g CoCl<sub>2</sub>∙6H<sub>2</sub>O, and 20 g agar). Consequently, 6 of ~5 mm<sup>3</sup> 7-day-old mycelia blocks from the MR-P plate were transferred into 100-mL MR-P liquid medium (duplicate n = 2 for environmental isolates and n = 6 for T. reesei) and cultured for another 7 days by shaking at 150-rpm to harvest crude enzyme (secretome) from each of isolated fungal strains and the benchmark strain T. reesei for following cellulolytic activity tests and enzyme characteristics assessments.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Screening Potential Cellulases Based on Activity Tests</title><p>The crude enzymes (or secretomes) produced from fungal strains were tested for cellulolytic activities using pNPG (5mM), CMC (1%, w/v), and avicel (1%, w/v) as substrates in order to screen potential cellulases. Additionally, FPase activity was extra conducted for potential exoglucanase using a piece of 3 mg filter paper as substrate (6mm-diameter circle shape cut by paper puncher) in order to compare with other previous studies. The enzymatic pNPGase activity was determined based on amount of p-nitrophenol (pNP) released from 5 mM pNPG after 5-min reaction at 55˚C and pH 5 by measuring absorbance at a wavelength of 405 nm in a microtiter plate reader (SpectraMax M5e, Molecular Devices, USA). Additionally, the CMCase, avicelase, and FPase activities were assessed by measuring reducing sugar concentration at a wavelength of 550 nm using the di-nitro- salicylic acid (DNS) method after reacting at 55˚C and pH 5 for 10 minutes (for CMCase) or 60 minutes (for avicelase and FPase) in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer. All the cellulolytic activities were represented as U/mL (μmol of product, i.e., pNP or reducing sugar, produced within 1 minute per mL of enzyme).</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Optimal Cultivation Conditions</title><p>Optimal cultivation conditions for the potential fungal strains (i.e., strains #58, #60, and #71) (original sample names: 13-5-2-2, 13-6-2A, and THU4) were investigated by culturing the fungal strains at two temperature levels of 25˚C or 30˚C (using thermal-control water bath) and three pH values of 5, 6, or 7; and, followed by avicelase activity assessments for the fungal secretomes at six temperature levels (i.e., 30˚C, 40˚C, 50˚C, 60˚C, 70˚C, and 80˚C) and eight pH values (i.e., pH 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9). The avicelase activities were represented as relative activity (%) by comparing each activity with the highest activity measured throughout the assessments and used to determine the optimal cultivation conditions and the optimal avicelase reaction conditions.</p><p>In addition, pH stability and thermostability for the most potential crude enzyme were also resolved by incubating the fungal secretome at eight different pH levels (pH 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9) or six temperature levels (30˚C, 40˚C, 50˚C, 60˚C, 70˚C, and 80˚C) for four hours and followed by avicelase activity test under optimal reaction conditions. All measured avicelase activities were also converted to relative activity (%) by deviding each activity with the highest activity measured throughout the assessments for assessing enzyme stability.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Identification of Potential Cellulase-Secreting Fungal Strain</title><p>Genomic DNA of the potential fugal strain #58 was purified from 6-day cultured fungal mycelia using a commercial extraction kit (Genomic DNA Extraction Kit, Fast ID, Genetic ID NA, IA, USA). Identification of the fungal strain #58 was conducted by comparing gene sequences of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region that was PCR-amplified using ITS1 forward primer (TCC GTA GGT GAA CCT GCG G) and ITS4 reverse primer (TCC TCC GCT TAT TGA TAT GC). Each 25-μl PCR reaction contained 12.5 μl of Master Mix (EmeraldAmp<sup>&#174;</sup> MAX HS PCR Master Mix, TaKaRa, Shiga, JP), 1 μl of each 10 μM forward and reverser primers (final concentrations were 400 nM), 8.5 μl of PCR-grade water, and 2 μl of the fungal DNA extract. A PCR reaction were run in a thermal cycler (MyCycler™, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CS, USA) based on the following program: 5 min at 94˚C; followed by 35 cycles at 94˚C for 1 min, 50˚C for 1 min, 72˚C for 1 min; and finally 10 min at 72˚C.</p><p>PCR amplicon was purified from agarose gel and sent for sequencing at MissionBio Co (Taipei, TW). Sequencing result was compared with NCBI database to determine fugal genus and species. The ITS fragments of the fungal strain #58, the first matched fungal species, and some closely related fungal strains were aligned by ClustalX method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref20">20</xref>] and phylogenetic trees were constructed by neighbor-joining method and displayed with TreeView program [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref21">21</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. PAGE for Target Exo-Glucanase Identification and Quantification</title><p>Crude enzyme concentration was determined based on Bio-Rad Protein Assay using BSA (bovine serum albumin) as calibration standards (Bio-Rad, USA). For better visualization on PAGE (polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis), the crude enzyme was further concentrated by lyophilisation for 4 hours and followed by dialyses for 3 hours to eliminate salts and metals in the MR culture medium using 3500 MWCO SnakeSkin™ Dialysis Tubing (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Life Technologies, Waltham, MA, USA).</p><p>Native PAGE and SDS (sodium dodecylsulfate) PAGE were performed based on the protocols suggested by Hoefer’s Protein Electrophoresis Applications Guide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref22">22</xref>] . Briefly, the concentrated crude enzyme was directly loaded in a 10% native-PAGE or first denatured by heating for 3 minutes at 100˚C in a 2&#215; protein treatment buffer (containing 0.125 M Tris-HCl, 4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 0.2 M DTT, and 0.02% bromophenol blue) and then loaded in a 10% SDS-PAGE gels to conduct electrophoresis (90 V for 30 minutes and then 140 V for 90 minutes). Followed by electrophoresis, the gel was stained with Coomassie blue R250 to view the native-PAGE or SDS-PAGE images. For zymographic assessment, the native-PAGE gel was further merged in a MUC solution (pH 5) and incubated at 70˚C and 20 rpm for 30 minutes and subsequently observed under UV light. Exoglucanase activity was visible as clear light bands against a black background.</p><p>The bands of target exoglucanase observed on the SDS-PAGE were cut and purified from gel and analyzed for amino acid sequences at a Proteomics Core Laboratory (located in the Agricultural Biotechnology Center of Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan) using Applied Biosystems Procise<sup>&#174;</sup> Protein Sequencer model 494 (Applied Biosystems, USA). The sequenced amino acid fragments were compared with sequences from the NCBI protein database using a program of Protein BLAST.</p><p>Additionally, proportion of the target exoglucanase within the crude enzyme produced from the fungal strain #58 was estimated by using another 10% SDS-PAGE with different amounts of BSA as standards (i.e., 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 μg BSA). A calibration curve was constructed based on correlations between protein concentrations and image intensities of protein on the PAGE; and, was used to calculate the quantity of the target exoglucanase. Specific FPase and avicelase activities were determined afterward according to the exoglucanase concentration evaluated from the above-mentioned approach.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Fungal Strains Culturing and Cellulosic Activities Screening</title><p>During 7-day cultivation for the fungal strains isolated from environments together with the benchmark strain T. reesei, avicelase activities of the fungal-secreted crude enzymes (for indicating exo-glucanase titers) increased gradually and reached highest levels mostly around 6 days (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). CMCase and pNPGase activities also reached highest levels after 5 - 7 days cultivation (time course activity profile data not showed). Among the 92</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Time-course profiles of avicelase activities for T. reesei (n = 6) and fungal strains #58, #59, #60, and #63 (n = 2) during 7-day cultivation at pH ~ 5.3 and room temperature ~ 27˚C</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2880051x6.png"/></fig><p>environmental isolates, most of them had highest avicelase activities less than 0.1 U/mL while only some fungal strain such as #58, #59, #60, and #63 showed more significant avicelase activities (&gt;0.1 U/mL) as illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. The avicelase activities for fungal strain #58 increased more significantly (up to about 0.106 U/mL) than other fungal strains only after about 1 day cultivation and reached a highest level of 0.209 U/mL at 6<sup>th</sup>-day making it one of the top candidates for finding novel potential exoglucanase.</p><p>The highest avicelase, CMCase, and pNPGase activities for each fungal strain during 7-day cultivation were selected for further comparisons to screen potential cellulases (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). Most of the fungal strains had notable CMCase (endo-glucanase) activities and few of them even had higher CMCase activity than that for T. reesei (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b)). Besides, few fungal strains had pNPGase (beta-glucosidase) activities (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(c)). In addition, six out of 92 fungal strains had avicelase activities higher than 0.1 U/mL (i.e., strains # 26, #58, #59, #60, #63, and #71) as T. reesei had an avicelase activity of 0.27 &#177; 0.02 U/mL (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a)). Beside the results from tube activity assay mentioned above, MUC zymogram was also used to preliminarily screen exoglucanase activity for these six strains. MUC zymogram results showed only strains #58, #60, and #71 had significant MUCase activities (images showed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a)). Therefore, the fungal strain #58, #60, and #71 were selected for further assessing their optimal culturing conditions and optimal avicelase reaction conditions.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Optimal Culturing Conditions, Enzyme Reaction Conditions, and Enzyme Stability</title><p>Fungal strain #58 grew at a pH of 5 and a temperature of 25˚C exhibited better avicelase activity than other culturing conditions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). Higher pH values at 6 or 7 and higher temperature at 30˚C resulted in less avicelase activity. In addition, optimal enzyme reaction conditions for secretome of the fungal strain #58 (produced at pH 5 and 25˚C) were in a pH range of 4 - 6 and a temperature range of 60˚C - 80˚C (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a)). Furthermore,</p><fig-group id="fig2"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Avicelase (a); CMCase (b); and pNPGase (c) activities for T. reesei and 92 fungal strains from environments. Top three strain numbers were indicated.</title></caption><fig id ="fig2_1"><label>(b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2880051x7.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_2"><label>(c)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2880051x8.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_3"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2880051x9.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Optimal growth conditions of fungal strains #58 were determined based on assessments of relative activity (%) of crude enzymes produced at three pH levels of 5 (a) (d); 6 (b) (e); or 7 (c) (f) and two incubation temperatures of 25 (a) (b) (c) or 30˚C (d) (e) (f). Avicelase activity tests were conducted under 8 different pH levels (i.e., 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, or 9) and 6 different reaction temperatures (i.e., 30˚C, 40˚C, 50˚C, 60˚C, 70˚C, or 80˚C)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2880051x10.png"/></fig><p>the exo-glucanase activity for the fungal strain #58 remained more stable at acid conditions (pH 3 - 5) than at base conditions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(a)); and, could stay rather stable over a wide temperature range even at high temperature of 70˚C - 80˚C (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>(b)). By considering enzyme stability, optimal avicelase reaction conditions were lastly determined as a pH of 5 and a temperature of 70˚C for the secretome of strain #58.</p><p>During 7-day cultivations for the 92 isolated fungal strains, the culturing pH was around 5.3 for the MR-P medium and incubation temperature was round 27˚C for room temperature of the laboratory with air conditioner. These culturing conditions were close to those culture conditions determined for the fungal strain #58 (pH 5 and 25˚C); and, preliminarily screening results indicated the strain #58 was the most competitive candidate for exploring potential exo-glucanase. The avicelase activity gained during screening (0.209 U/mL) was even higher than that at pH 5 and 25˚C (0.145 U/mL) for optimal culturing conditions assessment. Furthermore, the screening conditions might not suitable for other fungal strains as the strains #60 and #71 had better avicelase activities when cultured at 25˚C and at pH 7 and 6, respectively (data not showed). Nevertheless, the highest avicelase activities for strain #60 (relative activity 50.3% under optimal culturing and enzyme reaction conditions) and #71 (94.2%) were still lower than that for the stain #58 (100%). Hence, only the results for the strain #58 were showed in the <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. When the fungal strain #58 was cultured at 30˚C, the avicelase activities of harvested secretomes were typically less than 60% of the highest avicelase activities observed at 25˚C and pH5 suggesting lower temperature around 25-27˚C and pH about 5-5.3 were more suitable for exo-glucanase production from the strain #58 than at 30˚C and pH 6-7.</p><p>Interestingly, as the fungal strain #58 was cultured at 30˚C, optimal avicelase reaction conditions of the crude enzyme appeared to be shifted from pH 6 and 70˚C (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b)) to pH 4 and 60˚C (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(d) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(e)). Besides, when it was cultured at pH 7, the optimal enzyme reaction conditions (i.e., pH 7 - 8 and 30˚C - 50˚C, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(c) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(f)) were different from those for the secretomes harvested at pH 5 and 6 (i.e., pH 4 - 6 and 60˚C - 70˚C, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b), <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(d), and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(e)). The results indicated that various types of enzymes (e.g., isozymes) with diverse characteristics might produce from the strain #58 when it was cultured under different pH and temperature conditions. A previous study had suggested that productions of lignolytic enzymes from a basidiomycetous fungal strain were dissimilar under different culture conditions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref23">23</xref>] ; and, another report had indicated that Aspergillus fumigates Z5 produced different proteins after</p><fig-group id="fig4"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> (a) Optimal reaction pH and temperature and (b) pH and thermal stabilities of the crude enzymes for fungal strain #58.</title></caption><fig id ="fig4_1"><label> (b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2880051x11.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>cultivation with various carbon sources (i.e., glucose, avicel, and rice straw) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref24">24</xref>] . It was surmised some cellulolytic enzymes might not be produced or might just be produced at very low level under inappropriate culturing conditions.</p><p>Given that some other common cellulase-secreting fungi (e.g., Aspergillus sp., Fusarium sp., Penicillium sp., and Trichoderma sp.) typically having optimal culturing pH level of about 5 and optimal temperature of around 28˚C - 30˚C, the fungal strain #58 isolated in this study seemed more suitable to be cultured under low pH of 5 as well but at lower temperature of 25˚C - 27˚C. Besides, crude enzyme harvested from the strain #58 had better avicelase activities when reacted at pH 5 that was similar to most of other exo-glucanases (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>); but, had an optimal reaction temperature of 70˚C which was much higher than typical reaction temperature of 50˚C - 60˚C for other exo-glucanases. In addition, the strain #58 secretome remained stable at high temperatures of 60˚C - 80˚C for at least four hours which was seldom found for many of general cellulases from fungi. Some of these unique features inferred that the fungal strain #58 might different from the common cellulase-secreting fungi and some new exo-glucanases might be able to be found from this potential fungal strain.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Fungal Strain and Exo-Glucanase Identification</title><p>The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the fungal strain #58 was PCR amplified and further sequenced for fungal type identification. Sequencing result of the ITS fragment indicated that the fungal strain #58 was closely matched with a yeast Meyerozyma caribbica (96% similarity, NCBI accession number HG970748) in the Saccharomycetes class of Ascomycota phylum and formed a noticeable group together with Candia sp. and Pichia sp. in a phylogenetic tree (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>).</p><p>The Meyerozyma sp. had been identified in yeast population of olive mill wastes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref25">25</xref>] and had been found capable of improving maize productivity and minimizing requisite chemical fertilization [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref26">26</xref>] . Besides, a yeast strain of Meyerozyma caribbica MG20W had been isolated from plant rhizosphere soil and its complete genome had recently been sequenced [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref27">27</xref>] . These previous studies well supported that Meyerozyma sp. could ubiquitously present in some environments and might be able to secrete glycosidase, hydrolase, or specific cellulase.</p><p>Currently, a beta-1,3 exo-glucanase had been reported for the yeast Meyerozyma caribbica [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref28">28</xref>] which was belong to the glycosyl hydrolase (GH) 5 family (EC 3.2.1.58). But, no beta-1,4 exo-glucanase has been discovered from this yeast up to the best of our understanding. The avicelase activity observed for the secretomes produced from the fungal strain #58 isolated in this study indicated this Meyerozyma sp. yeast might capable of secreting beta-1,4 exo-glucanase.</p><p>The target exoglucanase of the Meyerozyma sp. strain #58 had a molecular size of about 70 kDa based on the SDS-PAGE analyses for the enzyme purified from bands observed and cut from the native-PAGE (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(c)). Besides, the target exoglucanase showed notable activity on the MUC zymogram like a commercial enzyme C1.5 L did (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(b)). It appeared that specific activity of C1.5L was higher than that of the</p><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> A phylogenetic tree showed fungal strain #58 belongs to the cluster of Meyerozyma sp</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2880051x12.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Comparisons of optimal reaction pH and temperature for activity tests of exo-glucanases for the exo-glucanases</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fungi</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Optimal pH</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Optimal temp (˚C)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Reference</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aspergillus sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref31">31</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref7">7</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Penicillium brefeldianum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref31">31</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Penicillium decumbens</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref32">32</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trichoderma reesei</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref31">31</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0 - 5.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref33">33</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref34">34</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fungal strain #58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >This study</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>strain #58 while C1.5L required smaller amount of enzyme than the strain #58 to exhibit strong image intensity like observed on the native-PAGE and MUC-zymogram (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(b)).</p><p>The target exoglucanase of the Meyerozyma sp. strain #58 was further extracted from the SDS-PAGE and subsequently analyzed for the amino acid sequences using LC/MS/MS. Two amino acid fragments from sequencing results (i.e., YSGTCDPDGCDFNPYR and AGAKYGTGYCDSQCPR) were identical with 1,4-beta- D-glucan cellobiohydrolases (CBHI) from Aspergillus aculeatus (NCBI accession number O59843) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref29">29</xref>] . Two amino acid fragments revealed from LC/MS/MS demonstrated the target Mc-CBHI was beta-1,4 exo-glucanase belonged to glycosyl hydrolase family 7 (GH7). The two fragments were also extensively found in some cellobiohydrolases of other strains including Aspergillus parasiticus SU-1 (KJK66765.1), Acytostelium subglobosum LB1 (GAM28417.1), Chaetomium senegalense (CDF76452), Lophodermium sp. ZY-2014 (AIJ50313.1), Penicillium roqueforti FM164 (CDM37977.1), or Rhizopus stolonifer var. reflexus (AHI87690.1) etc. within the NCBI database. These results demonstrated that the target exoglucanase of the Meyerozyma sp. strain #58 belonged to beta-1,4 exo-glucanase (or 1,4-beta-D-glucan cellobiohydrolases, CBHI) (EC 3.2.1.91) and was lately named Mc-CBHI.</p><fig-group id="fig6"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Native PAGE (a), MUC zymogram (b); SDS PAGE (c) showed target exo-glu- canase Mc-CBHI had a size of around 70 kDa and had significant exo-glucanase activity (using MUC as substrate). Proportion of Mc-CBHI in the crude enzyme mixture produced from fungal strain #58 was estimated using BSA as standards (d) and (e).</title></caption><fig id ="fig6_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2880051x13.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig6_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-2880051x14.png"/></fig></fig-group></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Specific FPase and Avicelase Activities of Mc-CBHI</title><p>The proportion of the Mc-CBHI within the crude enzyme produced from the strain #58 was further determined by comparing band intensity of the Mc-CBHI on the SDS-PAGE with those for known amount of BSA. Image intensities for different amount of BSA were well correlated with the quantity of BSA (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>(e)) and the target exoglucanase observed on the SDS-PAGE was estimated to be about 1.3 μg (or 1.66 mg/mL) which was approximately 3.6% of total crude enzyme (i.e., 36 μg on SDS-PAGE or 45.93 mg/mL) harvested from the Meyerozyma sp. strain #58.</p><p>The specific FPase and avicelase activities of the Mc-CBHI became 0.179 U/mg and 0.126 U/mg calculated from the volumetric activity of 0.376 U/mL and 0.209 U/mL (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>); which were close to those for T. reesei CDU-11 (i.e., 0.25 &#177; 0.05 and 0.11 &#177; 0.03 U/mg, respectively) and were about 40% - 50% of a commercial cellulase Accellerase-1000 (i.e., 0.44 &#177; 0.01 and 0.25 &#177; 0.01 U/mg) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref30">30</xref>] . These results indicated that of the newly-found Mc-CBHI was potentially competitive. If enzyme quality and quantity could be further improved by optimizing fermentation conditions or enzyme purification, the Mc-CBHI could be considered as a potential exoglucanase resource for related cellulolytic industrials.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>In summary, a novel exoglucanase named Mc-CBHI was explored from a Meyerozyma sp. fungal strain #58 (96% identical with a yeast strain of Meyerozyma caribbica based on ITS fragment comparison) which was isolated</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Comparisons of the exo-glucanase activity using FPase and avicelase for some various fungal strains from previous reports and this study</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fungi</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >FPase (U/mL)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Avicelase (U/mL)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Reference</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aspergilllus niger</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.123 (0.006 - 0.330)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref7">7</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aspergilllus flavus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.137 (0.117 - 0.163)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aspergillus tereus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.164 (0.069 - 0.300)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aspergillus nidulans</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.188 (0.009 - 0.300)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cladosporium sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.052</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ahernaria sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.056 (0 - 0.205)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fusarium sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.023 (0 - 0.059)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Neocallimastix frontalis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.067 U/mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.132 U/mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref35">35</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref33">33</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Penicillium janthinellum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.360 (0.24 - 0.55)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref36">36</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Penicillium sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.078 (0 - 0.139)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref7">7</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.973</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref37">37</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rhizopus sp.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.103 (0 - 0.222)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref7">7</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trichoderma harziamum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.034</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trichoderma longibrachiatum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.059</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trichoderma reesei</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25 &#177; 0.05 U/mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11 &#177; 0.03 U/mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref30">30</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39 &#177; 0.004</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref34">34</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Trichoderma viride</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63 (0.28 - 1.00)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref36">36</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.016 U/mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.59053-ref38">38</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fungal strain #58 (Meyerozyma sp.)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.376 0.179 U/mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.209 0.126 U/mg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >This study</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>from environmental airborne-fungal-spore samples. The Mc-CBHI could remain fairly stable after 4-hr incubation at acid condition (pH 3 - 5) and wide temperature range even at high temperature (70˚C - 80˚C). Additionally, it had specific FPase and avicelase activities of 0.179 U/mg and 0.126 U/mg, respectively, which were about 40% - 50% of a commercial cellulase Accellerase-1000 (0.44 &#177; 0.01 and 0.25 &#177; 0.01 U/mg). These results demonstrated that the newly-found Mc-CBHI from Meyerozyma sp. had high stability and specific activity and could be a potential exoglucanase resource.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This study was supported by a fund from the National Science Council (NSC) of Taiwan (NSC 101-2221-E- 264-004-). We would like to thank Academician Ho David T.H. of the Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology of Academia Sinica for providing supports for PAGE and zymogram analyses and amino acid sequencing. We also appreciate Dr. Huang C.-Y. of the Department of Environmental Science and Engineering and Dr. Chuang M.-D. of the Department of Chemistry of Tunghai University for sharing laboratory space and equipments for fungal strain cultivations and enzyme activity tests.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Hsion-WenKuo,Jia-KunZeng,Pi-HanWang,Wen-ChinChen, (2015) A Novel Exo-Glucanase Explored from a Meyerozyma sp. Fungal Strain. Advances in Enzyme Research,03,53-65. doi: 10.4236/aer.2015.33006</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.59053-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tian, C., Zheng, L., Miao, Q., Cao, C. and Ni, Y. (2014) Improving the Reactivity of Kraft-Based Dissolving Pulp for Viscose Rayon Production by Mechanical Treatments. Cellulose, 21, 3647-3654.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0332-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rubin, E.M. (2008) Genomics of Cellulosic Biofuels. Nature, 454, 841-845. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07190</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kuhad, R.C., Gupta, R. and Singh, A. (2011) Microbial Cellulases and Their Industrial Applications. Enzyme Research, 2011, Article ID: 280696. http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/280696</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lynd, L.R., Weimer, P.J., van Zyl, W.H. and Pretorius, I.S. (2002) Microbial Cellulose Utilization: Fundamentals and Biotechnology. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 66, 506-577.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.66.3.506-577.2002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kaur, B., Cberoi, H.S. and Chadha, B.S. (2014) Enhanced Cellulase Producing Mutants Developed from Heterokaryotic Aspergillus Strain. Bioresource Technology, 156, 100-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saini, R., Saini, J.K., Adsul, M., Patel, A.K., Mathur, A., Tuli, D. and Singhania, R.R. (2015) Enhance Cellulase Production by Penicillium oxalicum for Bio-Ethanol Application. Bioresource Technology, 188, 240-246.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.048</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jahangeer, S., Khan, N., Sohail, M., Jahangeer, S., Sohail, M., Shahzad, S., Ahmad, A. and Khan, S.A. (2005) Screening and Characterization of Fungal Cellulases Isolated from the Native Environmental Source. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 37, 739-748.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dar, R.A., Saba, I., Shahnawaz, M., Sangale, M.K., Ade, A.B., Rather, S.A. and Qazi, P.H. (2013) Isolation, Purification and Characterization of Carboxymethyl Cellulase (CMCase) from Endophytic Fusarium oxysporum Producing Podophyllotoxin. Advances in Enzyme Research, 1, 91-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/aer.2013.14010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boyce, A. and Walsh, G. (2015) Characterisation of a Novel Thermostable Endoglucanase from Alicyclobacillus vulcanalis of Potential Application in Bioethanol Production. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6474-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sapra, R., Park, J.I., Dalta, S. and Simmons, B.A. (2011) Novel Thermophilic Cellobiohydrolases. US Patent No. 20110207182 A1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brevnova, E.E. (2013) Isolation and Characterization of Schizochytrium aggregatum Cellobiohydrolases I (Cbh 1). US Patent No. 8470592 B2.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yu, S.-M., Ho, T.H.D., Kuo, H.-W., Wu, N.I.S., Li, C.-W. and Ju, Y.-M. (2013) Beta-Glucosidase and Uses Thereof. US Patent No. 8394619 B1.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kausar, H., Sariah, M., Saud, H.M., Alam, M.Z. and Ismail, M.R. (2010) Development of Compatible Lignocellulolytic Fungal Consortium of Rapid Composting of Rice Straw. International Biodeterioration &amp; Biodegradation, 64, 594-600. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2010.06.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khokhar, I., Haider, M.S., Mushtaq, S. and Mukhtar, I. (2012) Isolation and Screening of Highly Cellulolytic Filamentous Fungi. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 16, 223-226.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ja’afaru, M.I. (2013) Screening of Fungi Isolated from Environmental Samples for Xylanase and Cellulase Production. ISRN Microbiology, 2013, Article ID: 283423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/283423</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sivaramanan</surname><given-names> S. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2014</year>)<article-title>Isolation of Cellulolytic Fungi and Their Degradation on Cellulosic Agricultural Wastes</article-title><source> Journal of Academia and Industrial Research</source><volume> 2</volume>,<fpage> 458</fpage>-<lpage>463</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Horner, W.E., Helbling, A., Salvaggio, J.E. and Lehrer, S.B. (1995) Fungal Allergens. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 8, 161-179.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kostylev, M. and Wilson, D. (2012) Synergistic Interactions in Cellulose Hydrolysis. Biofuels, 3, 61-70. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.4155/bfs.11.150</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kim, I.J., Lee, H.J., Choi, I.-G. and Kim, K.H. (2014) Synergistic Proteins for the Enhanced Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Cellulose by Cellulase. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 98, 8469-8480. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-6001-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Larkin, M.A., Blackshields, G., Brown, N.P., Chenna, R., McGettigan, P.A., McWilliam, H., Valentin, F., Wallace, I.M., Wilm, A., Lopez, R., Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J. and Higgins, D.G. (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X Version 2.0. Bioinformatics, 23, 2947-2948. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Page RDM (1996) TreeView: An Application to Display Phylogenetic Trees on Personal Computers. Computer Applications in the Biosciences, 12, 357-358.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hoefer Inc. (1994) Protein Electrophoresis Applications Guide. Hoefer Scientific Instruments, San Francisco.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yamanaka, R., Soares, C.F., Matheus, D.R. and Machado, K.M.G. (2008) Lignolytic Enzymes Produced by Trametes villosa CCB176 under Different Culture Conditions. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 39, 78-84. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822008000100019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, D.Y., Li, J., Zhao, S., Zhang, R.F., Wang, M.M., Miao, Y.Z., Shen, Y.F. and Shen, Q.R. (2013) Secretome Diversity and Quantitative Analysis of Cellulolytic Aspergillus fumigates Z5 in the Present of Different Carbon Sources. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 6, 149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-149</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ntougias, S., Bourtzis, K. and Tsiamis, G. (2013) The Microbiology of Olive Mill Wastes. BioMed Research International, 2013, Article ID: 784591. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/784591</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nakayan, P., Hameed, A., Singh, S., Young, I.S. and Young, C.C. (2013) Phosphate-Solubilizing Soil Yeast Meyerozyma guilliermondii CC1 Improves Maize (Zea mays L.) Productivity and Minimizes Requisite Chemical Fertilization. Plant and Soil, 373, 301-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1792-z</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kim, J.-S., Baek, J.-H., Park, N.-H. and Kim, C. (2015) Complete Genome Sequence of Halophilic Yeast Meyerozyma caribbica MG20W Isolated from Rhizosphere Soil. Genome Announcements, 3, Article ID: e00127-15. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00127-15</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kim, B.-K., So, J.-H. and Rhee, I.-K. (2011) Molecular Cloning and Functional Expression of an Extracellular Exo-β-(1,3)-Glucanase from Candida fermentati Si. EMBL/GenBank/DDBJ Databases and Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) Databases. http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/G5DE31</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Takada, G., Kawaguchi, T., Sumitani, J. and Arai, M. (1998) Cloning, Nucleotide Sequence, and Transcriptional Analysis of Aspergillus aculeatus No. F-50 Cellobiohydrolase I (cbhI) Gene. Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering, 85, 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0922-338X(97)80345-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fujii, T., Fang, X., Inoue, H., Murakami, K. and Sawayama, S. (2009) Enzymatic Hydrolyzing Performance of Acremonium cellulolyticus and Trichoderma reesei against Three Lignocellulosic Materials. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2, 24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-2-24</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Howard, R.L., Abotsi, E., Jansen van Rensburg, E.L. and Howard, S. (2003) Lignocellulose Biotechnology: Issues of Bioconversion and Enzyme Production. African Journal of Biotechnology, 2, 602-619. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJB2003.000-1115</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gao, L., Gao, F., Wang, L.S., Geng, C.L., Chi, L.L., Zhao, J. and Qu, Y.B. (2012) N-Glycoform Diversity of Cellobiohydrolase I from Penicillium decumbens and Synergism of Nonhydrolytic Glycoform in Cellulose Degradation. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 287, 15906-15915. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.332890</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mountfort, D.O. and Asher, R.A. (1985) Production and Regulation of Cellulase by Two Strains of the Rumen Anaerobic Fungus Neocallimastix frontalis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 49, 1314-1322.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boer, H. and Koivula, A. (2003) The Relationship between Thermal Stability and pH Optimum Studied with Wild-Type and Mutant Trichoderma reesei Cellobiohydrolase Cel7A. European Journal of Biochemistry, 207, 841-848.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03431.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, X.L. and Calza, R.E. (1991) Fractionation of Cellulases from the Ruminal Fungus Neocallimastix frontalis EB188. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 57, 3331-3336.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adsul, M.G., Ghule, J.E., Singh, R., Shaikh, H., Bastawde, K.B., Gokhale, D.V. and Varma, A.J. (2004) Polysaccharides from Bagasse: Applications in Cellulase and Xylanase Production. Carbohydrate Polymers, 57, 67-72. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2004.04.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hao, J.J., Tian, X.J., Song, F.Q., He, X.B., Zhang, Z.J. and Zhang, P. (2006) Involvement of Lignocellulolytic Enzymes in the Decomposition of Leaf Litter in a Subtropical Forest. The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 53, 193-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2006.00093.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.59053-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Beldman, G., Searle-van Leeuwen, M.J., Rombouts, F.M. and Voragen, F.G.J. (1985) The Cellulase of Trichoderma viride-Purification, Characterization and Comparison of All Detectable Endoglucanases, Exoglucanases and β-Glucosidases. European Journal of Biochemistry, 146, 301-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1985.tb08653.x</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>