<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ABB</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2156-8456</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/abb.2015.68055</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ABB-58891</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Nutrient Requirements and Fermentation Conditions for Mycelia and Crude Exo-Polysaccharides Production by &lt;i&gt;Lentinus squarrosulus&lt;/i&gt;
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>elicia</surname><given-names>N. Anike</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Omoanghe</surname><given-names>S. Isikhuemhen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dietrich</surname><given-names>Blum</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hitoshi</surname><given-names>Neda</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute (FFPRI), Tsukuba, Japan</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Mushroom Biology and Fungal Biotechnology Laboratory, North Carolina A&amp;amp;T State University, Greensboro, USA</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>omon@ncat.edu(OSI)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>03</day><month>08</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>08</issue><fpage>526</fpage><lpage>536</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>9</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>16</month>	<year>August</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>19</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Lentinus squarrosulus Mont. is an emerging tropical white rot basidiomycete, with nutritional and medicinal benefits. Low levels of commercial cultivation of the mushrooms limit their availability for use as food and medicine. Mycelia from submerged fermentation are a suitable alternative to the mushroom from 
  L. squarrosulus. Three strains, 340, 339 and 218, were studied to determine optimum growth conditions for mycelia mass and crude exo-polysaccharides (CEPS) production. The experiments were conducted in a completely randomized design (CRD) with a factorial structure. Nutrients involving 8 carbon and 8 nitrogen sources were screened, and concentrations of the best sources were optimized. Optimized nutrients, interaction between strains and other parameters such as agitation and medium volume were investigated to obtain optimum fermentation conditions for biomass and CEPS production. Biomass yield varied among strains depending on carbon or nitrogen nutrient sources. Starch and yeast extract at 30 and 25 g/L were identified as the most important nutrients in mycelia and CEPS production. Nutrient optimization resulted in a 3-fold increase in mycelia mass: 12.8, 10.0 and 15.3 g/L in strains 340, 339 and 218 respectively. There was a significant interaction between strain, agitation, and volume (
  p &lt; 0.001). Mycelia mass increased with volume under shake conditions, while polysaccharides decreased. There was a weak and negative correlation between mycelia mass and polysaccharides (
  p = 0.02). Static conditions favored more polysaccharide production. Optimized fermentation conditions resulted in very high increase in biomass: 238.1, 266.9 and 185.0 g/L in strains 340, 339 and 218 respectively. Results obtained could be useful in modeling fermentation systems for large-scale production of mycelia mass, CEPS and other bio-products from 
  L. squarrosulus.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Mycelia Mass</kwd><kwd> Carbon and Nitrogen Requirements</kwd><kwd> Exopolysaccharides</kwd><kwd> &lt;i&gt;Lentinus squarrosulus&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Submerged Fermentation</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Lentinus squarrosulus Mont. is a white-rot basidiomycete found in many countries in African and Asia. Its fruit bodies are consumed as food in Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref1">1</xref>] . The fruit body, if harvested within 3 days of fruiting, is used as a meat substitute. It was not until recently that research started to emerge on its application in food [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref2">2</xref>] , medicine [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref4">4</xref>] and bioremediation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref5">5</xref>] . Proximate analysis shows that both the cap and stipe are rich in proteins, sugars, fiber, lipids, amino acids, vitamins B, C, and D, and minerals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref6">6</xref>] . The water soluble glucans from L. squarrosulus have immune-enhancing properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref7">7</xref>] , while water soluble extract from mycelia eliminated ulcer in rats within 72 hours [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref6">6</xref>] . Other investigators reported its potential as a biocontrol agent against Rigidoporus lignosus, a fungal pathogen of rubber, and an antimicrobial against Bacillus subtilis, Mucor ramannianus and yeast [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>Submerged fermentation has been used widely in the production of mycelia and bioactive compounds in other basidiomycetes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref8">8</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref10">10</xref>] . The process offers several advantages including: high productivity, compact and controlled environment for quality and consistency of products, and shortened production time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref8">8</xref>] . Therefore it is reasonable to explore some factors that could enhance mycelia yield and CEPS secretion in L. squarrosulus. Nutritional and physiological factors are critical for bioprocess optimization during fermentation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref11">11</xref>] . However, there is scant information on how these factors affect mycelia yield and crude exopolysaccharide (CEPS) secretions in L. squarrosulus. Carbon and nitrogen as nutrients are identified to be essential for cell survival, and can greatly influence cell proliferation, metabolite biosynthesis and secretion in submerged fermentation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref12">12</xref>] . Variability in utilization of different carbon sources by basidiomycetes within the same species and across genera is widely reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref13">13</xref>] . Therefore it was necessary to include various sources of these nutrients. Eight different commonly used and affordable carbon and nitrogen sources were selected and tested. Since basidiomycetes require oxygen for aerobic respiration, agitation was necessary for homogenous distribution of available oxygen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>To date there are only two reports on the effect of nutrient factors on vegetative mycelia growth in L. squarrosulus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref16">16</xref>] . The authors studied the effect of medium components on only one strain, but did not consider agitation and scalability. The present study investigates the influence of different sources and concentrations of carbon and nitrogen, as well as agitation, on mycelia growth and CEPS secretion in three strains of L. squarrosulus. The study also presents data on optimized medium for the growth of L. squarrosulus under static and shake fermentation conditions. Furthermore, the optimized conditions were studied for applicability in scale up fermentation.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Microorganisms and Inocula</title><p>Three strains of L. squarrosulus, 340, 339 and 218, used in the study were from the culture collection of the Mushroom Biology and Fungal Biotechnology Laboratory at North Carolina A&amp;T State University in Greensboro. Strain 218 originated from Ghana, while strains 339 and 340 are from Okinawa Japan. The strains were maintained on PDA slants at 4˚C until used. The cultures were activated by subculturing unto PDA media and incubated at 30˚C for 3 days. Inocula for all experiments were prepared by blending a plate culture (60 &#215; 15 mm) of each strain with 200 ml of sterile distilled, de-ionized water, using a Warring blender. All experimental media were seeded with 2% v/v inoculum.</p><p>Experiments were conducted using a basal medium composed of the following compounds, per liter: KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>, 1 g; NaH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>, 0.4 g; MgSO<sub>4</sub>∙7H<sub>2</sub>O, 0.5 g; CuSO∙7H<sub>2</sub>O, 0.5 g; CaCl<sub>2</sub>∙H<sub>2</sub>O, 74 mg; ZnSO<sub>4</sub>∙7H<sub>2</sub>O, 6 mg; FeSO<sub>4</sub>∙7H<sub>2</sub>O, 5 mg; MnSO<sub>4</sub>∙4H<sub>2</sub>O, 3.79 mg; CoCl<sub>2</sub>∙6H<sub>2</sub>O, 1 mg; Thiamine HCl, 0.1 mg; Pyridoxine HCl, 0.1 mg; Nicotinic acid, 0.1 mg. Carbon and nitrogen sources, and their concentrations, varied according to the parameter tested. The media were sterilized at 121˚C for 15 min except for the fructose-containing media, which were autoclaved at 110˚C.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Nutrient Requirements for Mycelia Production</title><sec id="s2_2_1"><title>2.2.1. Carbon Sources</title><p>To determine the best carbon source for optimum yield of mycelia, a 3 &#215; 8 factorial experiment was set up in 50 mL basal medium (in 250 ml Erlenmeyer flasks) containing 10 g/L of one of the following carbon sources: dextrose, fructose, mannose, mannitol, sorbitol, sucrose, starch or xylose. The control medium had no sugar. Each treatment flask was separately inoculated with either strain 340, 339 or 218 and each treatment was replicated five times. Inoculated media were incubated at 30˚C for 14 days. Mycelia biomass were harvested by filtration through Whatman No. 1 filter paper, washed three times and dried to a constant weight at 65˚C.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_2"><title>2.2.2. Nitrogen Sources</title><p>To determine the best nitrogen source for mycelia yield, a 3 &#215; 8 factorial experiment (strain and nitrogen source) was set up. Eight grams per liter of organic nitrogen sources―peptone, yeast extract, corn steep liquor and urea, and nitrogen contents corresponding to 0.96 g/L from inorganic sources―potassium sulfate, ammonium nitrate and ammonium sulfate―were separately used in the growth medium. Starch (10 g/L) identified from previous experiments was used as the carbon source. Sterilization, inoculation, incubation and mycelia yield determination were done as described in Section 2.2.1.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_3"><title>2.2.3. Concentrations of Selected Carbon and Nitrogen Sources</title><p>To determine the most appropriate concentration of selected carbon (starch) and nitrogen (yeast extract) sources to support high mycelia yield, two separate 3 &#215; 9 factorial experiments of strain and starch or yeast extract was conducted. The strains were cultivated at different concentrations ranging from 0 - 30 g/L of starch or yeast extract. Mycelia was harvested and determined as described in Section 2.2.1.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Scale up Fermentation under Shake and Static Conditions for Mycelia and Crude Exopolysaccharide Production</title><p>Series of 3 &#215; 5 &#215; 2 experiments were conducted to determine the effect of strain, volume and agitation on mycelia and exopolyssacharide yield. The strains were incubated for six days in an optimized medium composed of starch at 30 g/L, and yeast extract at 25 g/L in 5 different scale-up medium volumes of 50, 100, 250, 500, and 1000 mL under static and shake ~150 rpm (Barnstead/Lab-Line Max Q4000) conditions. Mycelia was harvested by filtration with Whatman no. 1 filter paper and washed three times. Crude exopolysaccharide (CEPS) was precipitated as previously reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref17">17</xref>] . The culture filtrates were stirred with 4 volumes of absolute ethanol, mixed vigorously and stored at 4˚C overnight. Precipitated CEPS were pelleted at 10,000 g (Eppendorf Centrifuge 5430R) at 4˚C for 10 min. Harvested mycelia and CEPS were dried at 65˚C to constant weight. Mycelia mass and CEPS were expressed as g dry weight/L of culture liquid.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Experimental Design and Statistical Analysis</title><p>The experimental design is a completely randomized design (CRD) with 2 or 3 factorial structure depending on the experiment. All experiments were carried out in 5 replicates, and the results are expressed as mean values. Differences among means were compared using Duncan’s multiple range test. Statistical Analysis Software (SAS) version 9.3 was used for analysis of variance (ANOVA). Mean comparisons, and regression and correlation analysis were carried out where applicable. Under scale-up fermentation experiments, analysis of variance was performed to determine whether there is main effect or interaction between any two or all of the variables in the 3 factors tested. Regression and correlation analysis was used to estimate the variability in mycelia/poly- saccharide yield due to culture volume, while correlation measured the strength of the relationship between mycelia yield and polysaccharide secretion among strains.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Utilization of Different Carbon Sources</title><p>The effect of eight different carbon sources on mycelia growth in strains 340, 339 and 218 of L. squarrosulus was studied. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) shows that there is a highly significant interaction between strain and carbon source (p &lt; 0.0001). Mean comparison using Duncan’s multiple range test shows that mycelia yield was highest when starch and mannose were used as carbon sources regardless of strain (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). In these two carbon sources, strains 340 and 218 had similar mean mycelia yield of 4.31 g/L that was significantly different from strain 339 (3.29 g/L). Beyond these two sugars, strains vary significantly in their growth response to other carbon sources studied. Modest mycelia yield was achieved with dextrose only in strain 218. The sugar alcohols (mannitol and sorbitol) produced higher mycelia mass in strain 218 than strains 339 and 340. The least mycelia yield was produced with fructose, xylose and sorbitol in strains 218, 339 and 340 respectively. The result from the study is consistent with other work that reported starch and mannose as being widely utilized by many basidiomycetes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref18">18</xref>] . Starch utilization is possible because some basidiomycetes synthesize effective amylolytic enzymes for hydrolysis of starch. Literature shows that mannose and dextrose are good substrates for cellular respiration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref19">19</xref>] . Therefore, it is not surprising that the strains studied produced high biomass with mannose. Similar response is seen in other basidiomycetes including Cordycceps militaris [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref18">18</xref>] , Pleurotus tuber-regium [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref20">20</xref>] , and Grifola frondosa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref21">21</xref>] . Intermediate utilization of mannitol by strain 218 and other basidiomycetes is associated with substrate oxidation or dehydrogenase enzyme activity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref22">22</xref>] . In contrast, Gbolagade et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref15">15</xref>] reported that other sugars such as fructose and maltose stimulated the most growth in L. subnudus (syn. Lentinus squarrosulus). The highest mean mycelia mass reported in their work was remarkably lower, 0.19 g/L, compared to 4.42 g/L observed in the present study. Since mean mycelia yield did not differ between starch and mannose within the strains studied, starch was used in further experiments, since it is more readily available and cheap compared to mannose.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Utilization of Different Nitrogen Sources</title><p>Analysis of variance shows that there is interaction between nitrogen source and strain (p &lt; 0.001), resulting in differences in mycelia yield among strains (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). Organic nitrogen sources were generally preferred over inorganic sources except urea. Strain 218 did not grow on urea supplemented medium. Among organic sources, yeast extract was clearly superior to peptone and corn steep liquor (p &lt; 0.0001). With yeast extract there was no significant difference between strains 340 and 218, which had higher mean mycelia yield of 6.17 g/L compared to 5.61 g/L in strain 339 (p &lt; 0.0001). Mycelia yield was significantly reduced with inorganic nitrogen sources. KNO<sub>2</sub> and the control treatments inhibited growth of all strains. The preference of basidiomycetes for organic nitrogen sources has been reported by others in experiments with Lentinus subnudus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref15">15</xref>] , Agaricus cinnamomea [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref23">23</xref>] , and Hericium erinaceus [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref24">24</xref>] . Most basidiomycetes prefer complex organic nitrogen sources in submerged fermentations, probably because certain essential amino acid(s) are not readily synthesized from inorganic sources during fermentation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref25">25</xref>] . The result is supported by Jennison et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref26">26</xref>] , who reported that white and brown rot fungi failed to grow when potassium nitrate, potassium nitrite, and ammonium chloride were used as nitrogen sources. Growth was significantly higher with ammonium nitrate than ammonium sulfate (p &lt; 0.0001).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Mycelia yield (g/L) of three strains of L. squarrosulus grown in 8 different carbohydrate sources</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Carbon sources</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Strain 218</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Strain 339</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Strain 340</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Mycelia dry weight g/L<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Starch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.30<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.30<sup>bcd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.39<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mannose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.42<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.27<sup>cd</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.30<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dextrose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.30<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.48<sup>fgh</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.54<sup>bc</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mannitol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.82<sup>def</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.47<sup>kl</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.86<sup>ijk</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sorbitol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.65<sup>efg</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.35<sup>klm</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.73<sup>ijkl</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xylose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00<sup>hij</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.07<sup>m</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.36<sup>bcd</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fructose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.604<sup>jklm</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.82<sup>ijk</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.06<sup>cde</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sucrose</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00<sup>hij</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.24<sup>ghi</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.85<sup>ab</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.24<sup>lm</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.07<sup>lm</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.24<sup>lm</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>*</sup>Means with the same letters within columns and rows are not significantly different (p &lt; 0.0001).</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Mycelia yield (g/L) of 3 strains of L. squarrosulus grown in 8 different nitrogen sources</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Nitrogen sources</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Strain 218</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Strain 339</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Strain 340</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Mycelia dry weight g/L<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Organic</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yeast Extract</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.12<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.61<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.22<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Peptone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.24<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.47<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.24<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Corn Steep Liquor</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.85<sup>de</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.02<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.59<sup>e</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Urea</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63<sup>i</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.95<sup>hi</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.06<sup>gh</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Inorganic</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.17<sup>f</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57<sup>i</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.07<sup>f</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.35<sup>g</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.91<sup>j</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.38<sup>g</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >KNO<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.057<sup>j</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07<sup>hi</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06<sup>j</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >KNO<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00<sup>j</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00<sup>j</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00<sup>j</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Control</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00<sup>j</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00<sup>j</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00<sup>j</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>*</sup>Means with the same letters within columns and rows are not significantly different (p &lt; 0.0001).</p><p>The apparent differences in utilization of various ammonium compounds could arise in part from differences in hydrogen ion concentrations produced in aqueous solutions by the compounds. Ammonium sulfate supplies twice the acidity as ammonium nitrate in solution. Mean mycelia yields from yeast extract was significant among strains, and therefore it was used in further studies.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Effect of Different Concentrations of Selected Carbon and Nitrogen Sources on Mycelia Yield</title><p>In previous experiments, starch and yeast extract were selected as the best carbon and nitrogen sources that support cell growth and high biomass yield in the strains studied. It was important to optimize the concentration of these nutrients in order to maximize mycelia yield. ANOVA shows that strain and concentration interact with both nutrients at a highly significant level (p &lt; 0.0001). Regression analysis shows that there is a non-linear relationship between starch or yeast extract concentration and mycelia yield; the equation of the model is displayed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> respectively. The strains had variable yield in mycelia (p &lt; 0.05) depending on concentration of starch or nitrogen within the range tested. Starch accounted for more variability in mycelia yield than yeast extract in strains 218 (96% versus 87%) and 339 (95% versus 79%) while they seem to be of equal strength in strain 340 (84% versus 85%). Mean mycelia yield was highest at elevated starch concentrations of between 20 - 30 g/L. Strains 218 and 340 produced the most mycelia at 30 g/L, although there was no difference in mycelia yield between 25 and 30 g/L in strain 339 (p = 0.02). Based on statistical data, 30 g/L of starch was selected and used in further experiments.</p><p>Strain response to yeast extract is different from starch. Strain 218 and 340 produced the most mycelia with no difference in mean yield between 20, 25 and 30 g/L yeast extract. Therefore 25 g/L was selected as the median concentration for further research. Biomass was significantly lower (p = 0.05) in strain 339 compared to others, however its response to yeast extract concentration was similar to other strains.</p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Scale up Fermentation for Mycelia Yield and Crude Exopolysaccharide (CEPS) Production in Optimized Medium under Static and Shaken Conditions</title><p>The result (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>) from Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) shows that there is highly significant interaction (p &lt; 0.0001) in all possible combinations of the three factors tested (strain versus agitation, strain versus volume, volume versus agitation, strain versus volume versus agitation). Since the factors considered particularly influence fermentation, data interpretation follows a 3-way ANOVA. Regardless of strain type and culture volume, shake</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Regression of mycelia yield in 3 strains of L. squarrosulus cultured in different concentrations of starch as sole carbon source</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7301022x6.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Regression of Mycelia yield in 3 strains of L. squarrosulus cultured in different concentra- tions of yeast extract as solenitrogen source</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7301022x7.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Analysis of variance of mycelia yield in 3 strains of L. squarrosulus showing interaction between 3 factors (strain, volume and agitation)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sources of variation</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >df</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sum of squares</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mean square</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >F value</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pr &gt; F</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Treatment</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >682,495.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23534.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >555.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Strain</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5099.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2549.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Volume</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >215,214.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53,803.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1270.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Strain &#215; volume</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8747.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1093.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Agitation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >214,880.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5072.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >142.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Strain &#215; agitation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3134.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1567.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Volume &#215; agitation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >228,147.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57,036.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1346.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Strain &#215; volume &#215; agitation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7271.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >908.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&lt;0.0001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Error</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >120</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5083.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >149</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >687,578.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>fermentation resulted in a highly significant increase in mycelia mass (p &lt; 0.0001) than static fermentation (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). The difference in mycelia yield under the two conditions ranged from 19.45 - 255 g/L, depending on volume of culture medium. Under agitation, mycelia mass increased with volume, whereas the reverse was observed with static fermentation, and mycelia mass decreased with volume. This pattern is consistent in the three strains tested. In similar observations, Cordyceps jianxiensis had a reduced growth when the culture volume increased from 50 to 300 mL under static fermentation condition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref27">27</xref>] . In all strains, the order of increase in mycelia yield was 50 mL &lt; 100 mL &lt; 250 mL &lt; 500 mL &lt;1000 mL. The three strains produced the most mycelia mass in the highest volume tested (1000 mL). At this volume, mycelia mass produced by strain 339 (266 g/L) is higher and differs significantly from strain 340 (239.8 g/L) and strain 218 ((185 g/L) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). These values are higher than 25.8 g/L reported by Ahmad et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref16">16</xref>] . Regression analysis of mycelia yield as a function of volume (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>), was significant with an R<sup>2</sup> of 0.29. Since 29% of variability in mycelia mass is explained by volume, it is possible that other parameters such as nutrient and agitation may have played major roles in influencing mycelia yield. There is a highly significant interaction (p &lt; 0.0001) between strain, volume and agitation in crude exopolysaccharide (CEPS) secretion. The influence of agitation on CEPS production in submerged fermentation by other mushroom have been reported [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref28">28</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref29">29</xref>] ). High mycelia biomass did not necessarily lead to high CEPS secretion in strains studied (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). In fact, CEPS secretion decreased with increase in mycelia yield. This is consistent with the work of Nour El-Dein et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref30">30</xref>] on Pleurotus pulmonarius, Lin and Sung [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref31">31</xref>] on Antrodia cinnamomea, Isikhuemhen et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref17">17</xref>] on L. squarrosulus under Solid State Fermentation (SSF) and Diamantopoulou et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref32">32</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref33">33</xref>] .</p><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Mycelia dry weight (g/L) of 3 strains of L. squarrosulus grown in 5 different volumes of optimized medium (50 - 1000 mL) with or without agitation. Bars with same letter or symbol (<sup>*</sup>) indicate that the means are not significantly different (p &lt; 0.0001)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7301022x8.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Mycelia dry weight resulting from submerged fermentation in 3 strains of L. squarrosulus using optimized medium, at different volumes with or without agitation</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Volume (mL)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Shake</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Static</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Strain 218</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Strain 339</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Strain 340</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Strain 218</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Strain 339</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Strain 340</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Mycelia dry weight g/L<sup>*</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.60<sup>K</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.97<sup>K</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.66<sup>K</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.18<sup>lm</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.02<sup>l</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.50<sup>lm</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.50<sup>HI</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.90<sup>JK</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.4I<sup>J</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.21<sup>lm</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.33<sup>lm</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.78<sup>lm</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.06<sup>ghi</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.42<sup>fg</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.76<sup>fgh</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.30<sup>lm</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.14<sup>lm</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.78<sup>lm</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.63<sup>f</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.71<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103.32<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60<sup>m</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.59<sup>lm</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.47<sup>lm</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >185.00<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >266.08<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >238.80<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53<sup>m</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.60<sup>lm</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.34<sup>lm</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>*</sup>Means with same letters are not significantly different (p &lt; 0.0001).</p><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Crude exopolysaccharide in 3 strains of L. squarrosulus grown in 5 different volumes of optimized medium (50 - 1000 mL) with or without agitation. Bars with same letter or symbol (<sup>*</sup>) indicate that the means are not significantly different (p &lt; 0.0001)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7301022x9.png"/></fig><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Increase in biomass dry weight at each stage of fermentation optimization process in 3 strains of L. squarrosulus. C = carbon; N = nitrogen; conc. = concentration; comb. = combined; scale up was done in IL medium volume</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/5-7301022x10.png"/></fig><p>Since mycelia mass increases with medium volume as discussed above, it is logical that CEPS will decrease as medium volume increases. These results do not agree with Xiao et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref27">27</xref>] who recorded higher CEPS in higher medium than low medium volumes. Higher CEPS was also reported by Ahmad et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref16">16</xref>] . The highest CEPS of 0.72 g/L was observed in 50 mL medium capacity in strain 340 while the lowest (0.01 g/L) was recorded in 1000 mL culture volume in strain 218. Regression analysis shows that 25% of variability in CEPS is due to volume. Since biomass and polysaccharide production are inverse to each other, it was necessary to determine if there is a relationship between them. A regression and correlation analysis shows a weak negative relationship (−0.25) between biomass yield and polysaccharide secretion (p = 0.002). This result is in line with earlier report of, Diamantopoulou et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref34">34</xref>] , who performed statistical analysis regarding correlation between mycelia mass and EPS for five mushroom strains in static and agitated cultures, and indicated a significant negative relationship between mycelia production with EPS synthesis. Isikhuemhen et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58891-ref17">17</xref>] recorded high yield of CEPS (up to 5.13 mg/mL) in the same mushroom (L. squarrosulus), albeit in Solid State Fermentation on cornstalk substrate. However in this study, CEPS was generally low in all strains, and maxed out at 0.72 mg/mL in strain 340, 0.69 mg/mL in strain 339 and 0.3 mg/mL in strain 218. In future studies, we will consider other factors that could increase CEPS yield, such as pH and aeration. Each step of the fermentation optimization process was an improvement on the previous step and mycelia mass increased accordingly (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). The highest mycelia mass was achieved when individual optimized factors were combined together in a single experiment. This is the first report on mycelia and CEPS production by L. squarrosulus in submerged fermentation under static and shake conditions.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>The overall goal of the experiment was to optimize fermentation conditions for mycelia mass production and crude exopolysaccharide secretion in L. squarrosulus. There are several factors that can affect fermentation, and the factors considered in the present study do not cover all, but the results suggest that they are particularly influential. We conclude that all the factors studied: strain, nutrient, volume, and agitation affect product yield. Moreover, there is interaction between combinations of these factors. The practical result of the study yields information for the fermentation and biotechnology industry, which use mycelia, polysaccharides, and/or their products for food and health promoting benefits, and for the research community interested in bioactive compounds for further research. Optimally, biomass and exopolysaccharides should be produced in culture medium containing 30 g/L of starch as the carbon source, and 25 g/L of yeast extract as the nitrogen source. During fermentation, if mycelia are desired, a higher volume of 1000 mL is recommended, with agitation at 150 rpm. However if exopolysaccharide is the product of interest, lower volumes of 50 - 100 mL should be used with no agitation. Using such medium and physiological conditions, mycelia yield and/or polysaccharide secretion can be scaled up or down based on desired product.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The research in this paper was funded through the National Institute for Food and Agriculture of the United States Department of Agriculture, Project No. NC.X-999-5-09-120-1, in the Agricultural Research Program, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>FeliciaN. Anike,Omoanghe S.Isikhuemhen,DietrichBlum,HitoshiNeda, (2015) Nutrient Requirements and Fermentation Conditions for Mycelia and Crude Exo-Polysaccharides Production by Lentinus squarrosulus. Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology,06,526-536. doi: 10.4236/abb.2015.68055</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.58891-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Isikhuenhen, O.S., Adenipekun, C.O. and Ohimain, E. (2010) Preliminary Studies on Mating and Improved Strain Selection in the Tropical Mushroom Lentinus squarrosulus Mont. International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms, 12, 177-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1615/IntJMedMushr.v12.i2.80</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Okhuoya, J.A., Akpaja, E.O. and Abot, O. (2005) Cultivation of Lentinus squarrosulus (Mont) Singer on Sawdust of Selected Tropical Tree Species. International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms, 7, 213-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1615/IntJMedMushr.v7.i3.790</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Isaka, M., Sappan, M., Rachtawee, P. and Boonpratuang, T. (2011) A Tetrahydrobenzofuran Derivative from the Fermentation Broth of Lentinus squarrosulu BCC 22366. Phytochemistry Letters, 2, 106-108.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phytol.2010.12.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sudirman, L.I., Lefebvre, G., Kiffer, E. and Botton, B. (1994) Purification of Antibiotics Produced by Lentinus squarrosulus and Preliminary Characterization of a Compound Active against Rigidoporus lignosus. Current Microbiology, 29, 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01570183</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adenikpekun, C.O. and Isikhuemhen, O.S. (2008) Bioremediation of Engine Oil Polluted Soil by the Tropical White Rot Fungus Lentinus squarrosulus Mont. (Singer). Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 11, 1634-1637. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2008.1634.1637</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Omar, N.A.M., Abdullah, N., Kuppusamy, Abdulla, M.A. and Sabaratnam, V. (2011) Nutritional Composition, Antioxidant Activities, and Antiulcer Potential of Lentinus squarrosulus (Mont.) Mycelial Extract. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2011, Article ID: 539356.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bhunia, S.A., Dey, B., Maity, K.K., Patra, S., Maiti, S., Maiti, T., Sikdar, S.R. and Islam, S.S. (2011) Isolation and Characterization of an Immunoenhancing Extracts of an Edible Mushroom, Lentinus squarrosulus (Mont.) Singer. Carbohydrate Research, 346, 2039-2044. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2011.05.029</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tang, Y.Z., Zhu, L.W., Li, H.M. and Li, D.S. (2007) Submerged Culture of Mushrooms in Bioreactors—Challenges, Current-State-of-the-Art, and Future. Food Technology, 45, 221-229.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Castro, J.I. and Taylor, E.R. (2002) Use of Different Nitrogen Sources by the Ectomycorrhizal Mushroom Cantharellus cibarius. Mycorrhiza, 12, 131-137. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00572-002-0160-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, W., Zhao, Z. and Li, Y. (2011) Simultaneous Increase of Mycelia Biomass and Intracellular Polysaccharide from Formes formentarius and Its Biological Function of Gastric Cancer Intervention. Carbohydrate Polymers, 65, 369-375.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.02.035</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhong, J.J. and Tang, Y.J. (2004) Submerged Cultivation of Medicinal Mushrooms for Production of Valuable Bioactive Metabolites. Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, 87, 25-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/b94367</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wasser, S.P., Elisashvili, V.I. and Tan, K.K. (2003) Effects of Carbon and Nitrogen Sources in the Medium on Tremella mesenterica Retz: Fr. (Heterobasidiomycetes) Growth and Polysaccharide Production. International Journal of Medicinal Mushrooms, 5, 49-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1615/InterJMedicMush.v5.i1.70</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Manjunathan, J. and Kaviyarasan, V. (2010) Studies on the Growth Requirements of Lentinus tuber-regium (Fr.), An Edible Mushroom. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 5, 81-85.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sinha, J., Bae, J.T., Park, J.P., Kim, K.H., Song, C.H. and Yun, J.W. (2001) Changes in Morphology of Paecilomyces japonica and Their Effect on Broth Rheology during Production of Exo-Biopolymers. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 56, 88-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002530100606</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gbolagade, J.S., Fasidi, I.O., Ajayi, E.J. and Sobowale, A.A. (2006) Effect of Physico-Chemical Factors and Semi-Synthetic Media on Vegetative Growth of Lentinus subnudus (Berk.), an Edible Mushroom from Nigeria. Food Chemistry, 99, 742-747. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.08.052</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ahmad, R., Al-Shorgani, N.K.N., Hamid, A.A., Yusoff, W.M.W. and Daud, F. (2013) Optimization of Medium Components Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) for Mycelium Biomass and Exopolysaccharide Production by Lentinus squarrosulus. Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology, 4, 1079-1085.http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/abb.2013.412144</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Isikhuenhen, O.S., Mikiashvili, N.A., Adenikpekun, C.O., Ohimain, E. and Shahbazi, G. (2012) The Tropical White Rot Fungus, Lentinus squarrosulus Mont.: Lignocellulolytic Enzymes Activities and Sugar Release from Cornstalks under Solid State Fermentation. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 28, 1961-1966.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11274-011-0998-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kwon, J.S., Lee, J.S., Shin, W.C., Lee, K.E. and Hong, E.K. (2009) Optimization of Culture Conditions and Medium Compositions for the Production of Mycelial Biomass and Exo-Polysaccharides with Cordyceps militaris in Liquid Culture. Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering, 14, 756-762. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12257-009-0024-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Griffin, D.H. (1994) Fungal Physiology. 2nd Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wu, J.Z., Cheung, P.C.K., Wong, K.H. and Huang, N.L. (2003) Studies on the Submerged Fermentation of Pleurotus tuber-regium (Fr.) Singer: 1. Physical and Chemical Factors Affecting the Rate of Mycelial Growth and Bioconversion Efficiency. Food Chemistry, 81, 389-393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00457-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shih, I., Chou, B., Chen, C., Wu, J. and Hsieh, C. (2008) Study of Mycelia Growth and Bioactive Polysaccharide Production in Batch and Feed-Batch Culture of Grifola frondosa. Bioresource Technology, 99, 785-793.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.030</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Solomon, P.S., Water, O.D.C. and Oliver, R.P. (2007) Decoding the Mannitol Enigma in Filamentous Fungi. Trends in Microbiology, 15, 257-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2007.04.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shih, I., Pan, K. and Hsieh, C. (2006) Influence of Nutritional Components and Oxygen Supply on Mycelia Growth and Bioactive Metabolites Production in Culture of Anthrodia cinnamomea. Process Biochemistry, 41, 1129-1135.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2005.12.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huang, D., Cui, F., Li, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhao, J., Han, X., Xiao, X., Qian, J., Wu, Q. and Guan, G. (2007) Nutritional Requirement for the Mycelia Biomass and Exopolymer Production by Hericum erinaceus CZ-2. Food Technology and Biotechnology, 45, 389-395.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jung, I.C., Kim, S.H., Kwon, Y.I., Kim, S.Y., Lee, J.S., Park, S., Park, K.S. and Lee, J.S. (1997) Cultural Condition for the Mycelial Growth of Phelinus igniarius on Chemically Defined Medium and Grains. The Korean Journal of Mycology, 25, 133-142.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jennison, M.W., Newcomb, M.D. and Henderson, R. (1955) Physiology of the Wood-Rotting Basidiomycetes. Growth and Nutrition in Submerged Culture in Synthetic Media. Mycologia, 47, 275-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3755451</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Xiao, J., Chen, D., Wan, W., Hu, X., Qi, Y. and Liang, Z. (2006) Enhanced Simultaneous Production of Mycelia and Intracellular Polysaccharide in Submerged Cultivation of Cordyceps jiangxiensis Using Desirability Functions. Process Biochemistry, 41, 1887-1893. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2006.03.031</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Park, J.P., Kim, Y.M., Kim, S.W., Hwang, H.J., Cho, Y.J., Lee, Y.S., Song, C.H. and Yun, J.W. (2002) Effect of Agitation Intensity on the Exo-Biopolymer Production and Mycelia Morphology in Cordyceps militaris. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 34, 433-438.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Babitskaya, V.G., Shcherba, V.V., Puchkova, T.A. and Smirnov, D.A. (2005) Polysaccharides of Ganoderma lucidum: Factors Affecting Their Production. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology, 41, 169-173.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10438-005-0029-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El-Dein, M.M.N., El-Fallal, A.A., Toson, E.S.A. and Hereher, F.E. (2004) Exopolysaccharides Production by Pleurotus pulmonarius: Factors Affecting Formation and Their Structures. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 7, 1078-1084. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2004.1078.1084</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lin, E. and Sung, S. (2006) Cultivation Conditions Influence Exopolysaccharide Production by the Edible Basidiomycete Antrodia cinnamomea in Submerged Culture. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 108, 182-187.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2005.11.010</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diamantopoulou, P., Papanikolaou, S., Katsarou, E., Komaitis, M., Aggelis, G. and Philippoussis, A. (2012) Mushroom Polysaccharides and Lipids Synthesized in Liquid Agitated and Static Cultures. Part I: Screening Various Mushroom Species. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 167, 536-551. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12010-012-9713-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diamantopoulou, P., Papanikolaou, S., Katsarou, E., Komaitis, M., Aggelis, G. and Philippoussis, A. (2012) Mushroom Polysaccharides and Lipids Synthesized in Liquid Agitated and Static Cultures. Part II: Study of Volvariella volvacea. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 167, 1890-1906. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12010-012-9714-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58891-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diamantopoulou, P., Papanikolaou, S., Komaitis, M., Aggelis, G. and Philippoussis, A. (2014) Patterns of Major Metabolites Biosynthesis by Different Mushroom Fungi Grown on Glucose-Based Submerged Cultures. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 37, 1385-1400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00449-013-1112-2</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>