<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">TEL</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Theoretical Economics Letters</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2162-2078</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/tel.2015.54063</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">TEL-58828</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Business&amp;Economics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Simple Analysis of Dynamic Efficiency in Endogenous Fertility
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>azuki</surname><given-names>Hiraga</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>School of Political Science and Economics, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>20</day><month>07</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>04</issue><fpage>541</fpage><lpage>544</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>24</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>14</month>	<year>August</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>17</day>	<month>August</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  This paper compares with two conditions of dynamic (in)efficiency, which is “traditional” and “modified” in overlapped generations (OLG) model with endogenous fertility. We show that both two conditions of dynamic efficiency have a bliss point which maximizes the utility at steady state in endogenous fertility.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Dynamic (In)Efficiency</kwd><kwd> Overlapped Generations (OLG) Model</kwd><kwd> Endogenous Fertility</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>How many is the fertility rate optimal? This question is interesting in both developed and developing countries. In many advanced countries, they face the aging problem. On the other hand, many developing countries face the population explosion.</p><p>This paper investigates the dynamic (in)efficiency in overlapped generation (OLG) model with endogenous fertility. At least, we can evaluate the efficiency at steady state by using OLG model. To evaluate it, we show the two criterions of dynamic efficiency; the one is the “transitional” criteria, which compares with the fertility rate and interest rate. The other is “modified” one, which compares with whether exceeding of “modified” golden rule capital stock which maximizes the utility at steady state.</p><p>As for the model with endogenous fertility, there are several seminal literatures. Golosov et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58828-ref1">1</xref>] and Conde- Ruiz et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58828-ref2">2</xref>] analyze the efficiency of the overlapped generation model with endogenous fertility. Although these literatures investigate the efficiency condition, they do not distinguish the difference between the condition of dynamic efficiency with endogenous fertility and without it. Empirically, Abel et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58828-ref3">3</xref>] show that many advanced countries satisfy the dynamic efficiency. Their discussion, however, does not consider about the fertility rate which is one of the major factor of determining the return rate of capital because increasing fertility rate increases the amount of labor and the marginal productivity of capital.</p><p>This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we introduce the basic model. In Section 3, we evaluate the condition of dynamic efficiency using two criterions and we state the conclusion in Section 4.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. The Model</title><p>We use the model of Grozen et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58828-ref4">4</xref>] without social security mechanism, and relax the assumption of a small open economy. Moreover, we introduce capital stock to investigate the dynamic (in)efficiency in later section.</p><p>Similar to Grozen et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58828-ref4">4</xref>] , the economy is populated by a large number of individuals who live for two periods (young and old generations). When they are young; they inelastically supply one unit of labor. Their gross wage income (w) is spent on consumption<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500769x5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, offspring (n) and is saved for old age (s). That is, we assume</p><p>children to be viewed as normal gods. A parent only wants to raise children with a certain level of well-being, i.e. a child is only joyful for its parents if it is assured to receive a particular number of commodities and services. This is reflected in the price p of such a “quality of child”, which is constant and equal for all children in our representative agent model. Moreover, the cost of fertility contains not only price k, but also the opportunity cost of labor; i.e.<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500769x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. This cost is come from by the child raising.</p><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. The Households</title><p>First (young) and second (old) period consumption at t is restricted by the following individual budget constraints,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.58828-formula199"><label>, (1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500769x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.58828-formula200"><label>, (2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500769x8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500769x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the gross population growth rate. Therefore, we obtain the lifetime budget constraint,</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500769x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>We assume a representative individual’s utility function as follows,</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500769x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p>where 0 &lt; β &lt; 1 and γ &gt; 0.</p><p>In these settings, we solve the individual’s optimization conditions:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.58828-formula201"><label>, (3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500769x12.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.58828-formula202"><label>. (4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500769x13.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. The Firms</title><p>We set the production function as follows,</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500769x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><p>where K is the aggregate capital stock and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500769x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the share of capital income (0 &lt; α &lt; 1).</p><p>Output per capita is written as follows,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.58828-formula203"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500769x16.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500769x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Then, we obtain the factor price to solve the firm’s profit maximization problem:</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500769x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>The capital market clearing condition is written as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.58828-formula204"><label>. (5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500769x19.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Solving the Model</title><p>Using Equations (1)-(4) and the factor prices, we can obtain the closed forms,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.58828-formula205"><label>, (6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500769x20.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.58828-formula206"><label>, (7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500769x21.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.58828-formula207"><label>, (8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500769x22.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.58828-formula208"><label>. (9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500769x23.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Evaluating Dynamic (In)Efficiency</title><p>We check whether the model faces dynamic inefficiency a la Diamond [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58828-ref5">5</xref>] and Tirole [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58828-ref6">6</xref>] to compare with the interest rate and fertility rate which is equal to growth rate. Using above equations, we can obtain the following condition of dynamic inefficiency at steady state:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.58828-formula209"><label>, (10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500769x24.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>As 0 &lt; α &lt; 1, Equation (10) shows that there is unique value of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500769x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> that satisfies “golden rule”, which means the gross interest rate (accurately the return of capital stock) is equal to gross fertility rate.</p><p>As you can see, however, this condition does not necessary evaluate efficiency with respect to the utility maximization under endogenous fertility. Then, we re-evaluate the modified condition of dynamic efficiency. We introduce indirect utility function at steady state with respect to capital stock substituting Equations (6), (8) and (9):</p><disp-formula id="scirp.58828-formula210"><label>. (11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500769x26.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Differentiating Equation (11) with respect to k, we obtain the “modified golden rule” capital stock <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500769x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as follow:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.58828-formula211"><label>. (12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500769x28.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using Equation (12), we obtain the following proposition:</p><p>Proposition:</p><p>The (per worker) capital stock at steady state is dynamically inefficiency (efficiency) if<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500769x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. That is, the economy is dynamically inefficiency (efficiency) when;</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-1500769x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>We interpret several features in this proposition. First, higher (lower) p widens (narrows) the possibility of dynamic inefficiency, since the capital per worker mitigate and the return rate of capital increases. Second, on the other hand, other parameters do not have monotonic relationship about the possibility of dynamic inefficiency.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>This paper shows that the two conditions of dynamic (in)efficiency using OLG model with endogenous fertility. We show that both two conditions of dynamic efficiency have a bliss point which maximizes the utility at steady state in endogenous fertility and clarify that the condition of satisfying Pareto efficiency is not consistent with the case in the case that the marginal productivity of capital is larger than growth rate (which is equal to the fertility rate in this paper).</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>KazukiHiraga, (2015) Simple Analysis of Dynamic Efficiency in Endogenous Fertility. Theoretical Economics Letters,05,541-544. doi: 10.4236/tel.2015.54063</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.58828-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Golosov, M., Jones, L.E. and Tertilt, M. (2007) Efficiency with Endogenous Population Growth. Econometrica, 75, 1039-1071. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2007.00781.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58828-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Conde-Ruiz, J.I., Giménez, E.L. and Pérez-Nievas, M. (2010) Millian Efficiency with Endogenous Fertility. Review of Economic Studies, 77, 154-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2009.00568.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58828-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Abel, A., Mankiw, G., Summers, L. and Zeckhauzer, R. (1989) Assessing Dynamic Efficiency: Theory and Evidence. Review of Economic Studies, 56, 1-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2297746</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58828-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">van Groezen, B., Lees, T. and Meijdam, L. (2003) Social Security and Endogenous Fertility: Pensions and Child Allowance as Siamese Twins. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 233-251. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00134-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58828-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Diamond</surname><given-names> P. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1965</year>)<article-title>National Debt in a Neoclassical Growth Model</article-title><source> American Economic Review</source><volume> 55</volume>,<fpage> 1126</fpage>-<lpage>1150</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58828-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tirole, J. (1985) Asset Bubbles and Overlapping Generations. Econometrica, 53, 1499-1528. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1913232</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>