<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2011.27087</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-5838</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Calculation of the Zeeman-Fine Energies and the Spectrum with Doppler-Shift Correction of Atomic Lithium
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>aila</surname><given-names>Babsail</given-names></name><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Leda</surname><given-names>Bousiakou</given-names></name><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Salwa</surname><given-names>Alsaleh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mesude</surname><given-names>Saglam</given-names></name><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>lbabsail@ksu.edu.sa(AB)</email>;<email>leda@ksu.edu.sa(LB)</email>;<email>salwam@ksu.edu.sa(SA)</email>;<email>smasuda@ksu.edu.sa(MS)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>07</month><year>2011</year></pub-date><volume>02</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>752</fpage><lpage>758</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>April</day>	<month>18,</month>	<year>2011</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>May</day>	<month>27,</month>	<year>2011</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>June</day>	<month>12,</month>	<year>2011</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  We have calculated the Zeeman-fine energies of atomic Lithium (Li) by using the varying effective Land&#233; g-factor method. We take the principle quantum number in the range; (2 ≤&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; ≤10 ). For this range we find 26 different energy values and 325 wavelengths some of which are the same. The Doppler shift is found to be Δλ=&#177;0.004λ. The Doppler shift-corrected wavelengths are in perfect agreement with the observed (NIST) values for atomic Li.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Hydrogen-Like Atoms</kwd><kwd> Effective Land&#201; G-Factor</kwd><kwd> Quantum Entanglement</kwd><kwd> Zeeman-Fine 
Energies</kwd><kwd> Photonic Transitions</kwd><kwd> Quantum Flux Of Photon</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The investigation of hydrogen-like atoms with their low ionization potential and relative simplicity of their outer shell structure, have attracted a lot of attention. During the last two decades with the advent of laser cooling [1-4] and magnetic trapping [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.5838-ref5">5</xref>], as well as spin polarization related to quantum entanglement [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.5838-ref6">6</xref>], lithium and sodium have been the focus of a number of theoretical and experimental studies. Moreover with the realization of Bose Einstein condensation [7,8], they have attracted further attention.</p><p>Recently Saglam et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.5838-ref9">9</xref>] calculated the Zeeman-fine energy expression of hydrogen-like atoms given by:</p><p><img src="14-75000428\06200e60-6081-4574-8e96-92249204045e.jpg" /></p><p>corresponding to the eigenstates<img src="14-75000428\4827c1c0-0382-4855-a83d-1ad4980053de.jpg" />. Here the constant <img src="14-75000428\94956728-e498-431d-b4c3-ef303f58bf48.jpg" /> is a characteristic for each atom and determined from the ionization energy, <img src="14-75000428\a3032bee-9c81-462a-ac75-2087e1af2074.jpg" />is the cyclotron angular frequency corresponding to the effective magnetic field, <img src="14-75000428\8ae60cae-9e1a-47c2-8ef0-bbd6a34df738.jpg" />inside the atom and <img src="14-75000428\d21b8249-7d0d-4703-a662-69156e5d0a78.jpg" /> is the effective Land&#233; g-factor, which is treated as a varying parameter. As was discussed by Saglam et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.5838-ref9">9</xref>] the effective magnetic field, <img src="14-75000428\91742c87-8f6e-4e0e-a4e8-70e7a743b9cf.jpg" />can be very high so that this leads to the spin-flip energies of the order of (eV). For the case of atomic Cesium, the spin-flip energy was shown to be 1.38 eV. Saglam et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.5838-ref9">9</xref>] defined a dimensionless function:</p><p><img src="14-75000428\b6c07e12-3c47-4663-9cb0-7a6609154922.jpg" /></p><p>which takes the form:</p><p><img src="14-75000428\e99418b8-9dda-4d5e-a854-4b20adad9682.jpg" /></p><p>and depends on <img src="14-75000428\f2c46247-89e3-4517-b597-6ed69f8592e9.jpg" /> and <img src="14-75000428\9a77ca89-aa43-4293-a81e-86173b2ad608.jpg" /> directly and depends on <img src="14-75000428\6fb7d0da-a5c1-421b-8b09-3caaa4b90ed1.jpg" /> indirectly as the range of <img src="14-75000428\0bb1036d-1de8-4d14-afa3-747b54cc9f2e.jpg" /> is determined by<img src="14-75000428\09e52c10-cfe6-4c5e-8e75-12850311e0ef.jpg" />. They used the plots of</p><p><img src="14-75000428\2b6c2d1f-5168-407a-916e-7def42ab0d46.jpg" />(as a function of<img src="14-75000428\3dc120bc-ae30-49c3-9957-81a75443d117.jpg" />) to study the</p><p>(<img src="14-75000428\0454bbc8-d431-4fea-8f06-0a5e42b73647.jpg" />) <img src="14-75000428\0ae69238-b451-4835-8a46-1d1aeabdc165.jpg" />(<img src="14-75000428\68cd9c96-b187-4431-ae5d-46786b5cd7af.jpg" />)<img src="14-75000428\74d02692-5976-482d-bff5-60ad220d643a.jpg" />(<img src="14-75000428\8b8725eb-dd7b-45cd-89c8-b3d410b305dd.jpg" />)</p><p>transitions in hydrogen-like atoms and showed that the entanglements of <img src="14-75000428\f9b733c7-1461-45b3-baf5-2318a9ae8c72.jpg" /> and <img src="14-75000428\6f38ef2b-c40a-4403-bb9c-ad7032726837.jpg" /> states, occur at<img src="14-75000428\7963ba1f-177d-49f8-a19f-976f31937e0d.jpg" />. The aim of the present study is to calculate the Zeeman-fine energies and the spectrum of the atomic Lithium by using the above mentioned varying effective Land&#233; g-factor method. The outline of the present study is as follows: In Section 2.1 the energy levels of Hydrogen-like atoms in the presence of a uniform magnetic field is studied. In Section 2.2 we calculate the Zeeman-fine energies of Li atom. In Section 2.3 we establish the connection between the Zeeman-fine energies, effective Land&#233;-g factors, and the quantum flux of both photon and the electronic orbits corresponding to the entangled states. Section 2.4 gives the detailed calculation of the Zeeman-fine energies of Li atom. The calculation of the Doppler shift is given in Section 2.5. Section 3 is the conclusions.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Formalism</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Energy Levels of Hydrogen-Like Atoms in the Presence of a Uniform Magnetic Field</title><p>As was discussed by Saglam et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.5838-ref9">9</xref>], when an atom is subject to a laser beam, because of the photon’s magnetic moment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.5838-ref10">10</xref>] and hence the large intrinsic magnetic field along the propagation direction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.5838-ref11">11</xref>], we will have diamagnetic and paramagnetic effects which is associated with a large magnetic field inside the atom. This field is called the effective field,<img src="14-75000428\7b6433a7-e47a-44cf-9f42-f5d3369b9d39.jpg" />. The Land&#233;-g factor is also replaced by the effective value, <img src="14-75000428\3bbe72b8-4884-4c51-8740-df5476365cd3.jpg" />which is treated as a varying parameter [12,13]. With these replacements [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.5838-ref9">9</xref>] the energy eigenvalues corresponding to the eigenstates <img src="14-75000428\a269b564-9311-410f-888a-bd48ae1ef039.jpg" />reads:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.5838-formula36896"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-75000428\65372c80-ed18-4ed7-8d5a-226baa83be8c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here the constant <img src="14-75000428\acb2a528-2a6e-45ef-8997-271cf3f0ef8f.jpg" /> is the characteristic of each atom and determined from the ionization energy. Substituting the value of <img src="14-75000428\7869b60b-ac57-457b-a8d5-2629732d20fd.jpg" /> and <img src="14-75000428\95b619f3-d272-4fa4-9d1d-eacdbd75edec.jpg" /> in Equation (1), we find:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.5838-formula36897"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-75000428\ab0afad0-5227-41bd-b038-e9df4aedb323.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <img src="14-75000428\95b5ac20-3139-4c25-8f31-dfa9bffe371f.jpg" /> is the cyclotron angular frequency corresponding to<img src="14-75000428\dfb9089e-b3f8-4163-848a-1aff0576c466.jpg" />. As was discussed by Saglam et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.5838-ref9">9</xref>] the effective magnetic field, <img src="14-75000428\9516e9ba-d7db-47f0-9eef-a7f6ddb1e8af.jpg" />inside the atom can be very high so that this leads to the spin flip energies at the order of a few electron volts (eV). For the case of atomic Cesium, the spin flip energy is taken to be 1.38 eV. To proceed further, following Saglam et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.5838-ref9">9</xref>] we define a dimensionless function, <img src="14-75000428\2bd78641-34db-4426-ad84-29f8cd32061a.jpg" />which is given by the relation:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.5838-formula36898"><label>(3a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-75000428\b73c4d75-3859-4d9f-884c-bc4946883a5c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>or</p><disp-formula id="scirp.5838-formula36899"><label>(3b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-75000428\3d054e31-39f0-46f1-bcc6-0b6d2e92d3aa.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which depends on <img src="14-75000428\87d49c6d-3895-4153-b381-d25d2c4cde21.jpg" /> and <img src="14-75000428\1b272b74-b9d4-4be7-8145-3464e78a8446.jpg" /> directly and depends on <img src="14-75000428\19707b26-68c5-4eee-8738-c40074d7873e.jpg" /> indirectly as the range of <img src="14-75000428\4c4ccf0e-4f10-4826-8482-f994ac86a7f5.jpg" /> is determined by<img src="14-75000428\51a18ded-19ea-4ca4-b28d-025ef97b04ae.jpg" />. The plot of these <img src="14-75000428\7eb905a4-bb47-4014-bbf2-24e1a9407338.jpg" /> functions with respect to <img src="14-75000428\a36f68d2-f260-4d79-952a-bb12f2e382bc.jpg" />gives us the possible <img src="14-75000428\f805b7c0-77b4-43f6-846b-bdd1310a5ecb.jpg" /> values in the energy expression given by (1). At the first glance we see that the crossing of these lines correspond to integer values of <img src="14-75000428\a3af34a6-6eec-4568-a76f-97507ed4590b.jpg" />such as:<img src="14-75000428\58ecafd6-ffc4-4a29-a014-c71f1b1cf628.jpg" />. However in the following section we will see that for Li atom the allowed values of <img src="14-75000428\276a1178-f11b-4fca-a8a9-e9234d028630.jpg" /> are restricted only with the three odd integers. These are:<img src="14-75000428\d64c645e-e492-475e-a75d-d65a2fc06ca7.jpg" />. In the present study we will consider only <img src="14-75000428\cd1392dc-193b-479c-8a77-d45456e2aa97.jpg" /> values up to 10. We will see that in the range of (<img src="14-75000428\bb34e357-89c1-4156-8a26-d0bb34b974d9.jpg" />) we get 26 different energy values which produce 325 wavelengths some of which are the same. For each <img src="14-75000428\16f307f3-f29c-4edb-a38c-7bcc5a14b6a5.jpg" /> value we also calculate the Doppler shift and find that it is equal to: <img src="14-75000428\75c6e584-378d-43c9-bffd-d0c8f905bdaa.jpg" />. The Doppler shift-corrected wavelengths are in perfect agreement with the observed (NIST) values [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.5838-ref14">14</xref>] for atomic Li.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Calculation of the Effective Land&#233; G-Factors of the Zeeman-Fine Energies of Li Atom</title><p>In Li atom we have 3 electrons altogether. Therefore it will be easy to study <img src="14-75000428\f92f2ed1-ae13-42f9-853e-05b19b8fc923.jpg" /> as a function of<img src="14-75000428\0d4ad8ea-8863-4972-9586-d85beb83100b.jpg" />. The plots for <img src="14-75000428\749b9fe9-5c2f-4945-a84c-53de0ee6a25d.jpg" /> and <img src="14-75000428\8de47031-2fd5-48f8-b8c8-57aba2c9c296.jpg" /> are given in Figures 1(a) and 2(a) respectively; For <img src="14-75000428\490de807-c1f8-41c9-ba15-6e7d5100fc0c.jpg" />we have <img src="14-75000428\a5cfaf7b-f674-4c27-922b-a71d9cfbea22.jpg" /> and hence<img src="14-75000428\583fc2d6-be9b-4e05-bacd-fa983531e667.jpg" />, so from Equation (3) we get two lines crossing at<img src="14-75000428\de5a616b-033d-46e3-99ab-d86d5647467e.jpg" />. Therefore the first two electrons occupy the entangled state, with the energy corresponding to the crossing energies of <img src="14-75000428\39e0aba7-3117-4775-82d7-cc80adbb32bd.jpg" /> and <img src="14-75000428\712afae9-68a8-4d48-aba3-d4cba72b7a9d.jpg" /> states, which is the<img src="14-75000428\30aa1b48-17f7-44ea-8b76-a84fc6fb8d45.jpg" /> entanglement at <img src="14-75000428\2a541b64-2ccc-4494-a537-304e04f68dc0.jpg" /> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a)). For <img src="14-75000428\0686465f-ef0a-410d-b034-2423173f365e.jpg" /> we have <img src="14-75000428\5ccf0e0c-ec87-4ddb-8470-cf17d95f96f2.jpg" /> and hence<img src="14-75000428\caf4f7e8-d948-4567-bb27-ecbca87f31dd.jpg" />, so from Equation (3), the plots of <img src="14-75000428\38cd61f7-6ed3-42ac-81ed-8997a167e557.jpg" /> gives us the diamond shaped parallelogram whose corners correspond to <img src="14-75000428\92be36ae-22c6-48e1-a792-5c0f803cebbb.jpg" /> entanglement at<img src="14-75000428\fbad71fc-2bae-426f-93fd-a0c01682b228.jpg" />, <img src="14-75000428\d0d52cde-7986-40dc-9799-625bf1b025af.jpg" />and <img src="14-75000428\60a2927f-f60f-4c5a-8a50-b79cf6492bcd.jpg" /> entanglements at <img src="14-75000428\ea68904a-fba5-45f4-bb25-c1d669d3a481.jpg" /> and <img src="14-75000428\4418fb49-0397-41f0-b948-4920d817a0e5.jpg" /> entanglement at <img src="14-75000428\f076be84-86ea-4686-9496-85db64a44136.jpg" /> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a)). Therefore the third electron (the so called 2s electron) occupies the entangled state at crossing of <img src="14-75000428\edc5090a-f457-4a7b-85e0-074e1abe8cd6.jpg" /> and <img src="14-75000428\a300c23b-d274-433c-97d9-b8aa64ac5f00.jpg" /> states [(<img src="14-75000428\8309054a-fafd-4325-bff9-89eae3f12100.jpg" />) entanglements at<img src="14-75000428\a97b5949-5656-480f-bd6c-77480d336e56.jpg" />] which corresponds to the lowest energy, the ground state energy, for<img src="14-75000428\f6138e44-0888-4ae4-82d3-8859e93be4c3.jpg" />. The plots of energy expression (2) for <img src="14-75000428\d03e0286-4387-447b-82d7-b0b0ca1faabe.jpg" /> and <img src="14-75000428\0ba88621-c6d5-498e-ab86-d853e5e77e7d.jpg" /> are given in Figures 1(b) and 2(b) respectively. In order to find the excited states we go to the higher values of<img src="14-75000428\65fbd775-f94d-4dfe-a963-31ba65324a5e.jpg" />. The plots of <img src="14-75000428\4f1d8ced-285d-40c7-845e-a62cb6838301.jpg" /> and<img src="14-75000428\b7e35f4e-07bb-4b1e-926e-6e294566bf94.jpg" /> for <img src="14-75000428\d2ecf624-e256-4f4b-ade8-475e3a6a060c.jpg" /> and <img src="14-75000428\0bbc51b8-1516-43fd-bc0c-bbf1e012605e.jpg" /> are given in Figures 3 and 4 respectively. We see that although the crossings of these lines occur at the integer values of <img src="14-75000428\d69f243c-6a37-480a-9c34-8e05e4279dc4.jpg" />such as:<img src="14-75000428\925345ee-1e48-4dea-a964-e987c28f6c9a.jpg" />, however, as far as the photonic transitions are concerned, in the following section we will see that for Li atom the allowed values of <img src="14-75000428\91ecb33c-0a64-4678-997d-b33035b8f234.jpg" /> are restricted only with the three odd integers. These are:<img src="14-75000428\458f6668-053e-4c12-ad74-c9705f6ac1ec.jpg" />. The reason for this is that: First, The energy values given by (2) are limited to the range:<img src="14-75000428\7df7f51a-4dbe-44cb-87d0-8e7de462da82.jpg" />. Secondly, the value of the spin-flip energy which is equal to <img src="14-75000428\c38dee08-677b-435c-be1d-64770f344469.jpg" /> for Li atom and finally, the photonic transitions occur between the points satisfying the condition: (<img src="14-75000428\89705884-398d-465a-9c5c-f753596e02d8.jpg" />even integer). In passing we note that for a given<img src="14-75000428\63db8e1b-f521-4906-9d8a-146dfc28e78d.jpg" />, although the maximum value of <img src="14-75000428\df962c2c-9c12-4bae-a642-0087c65eccee.jpg" /> is equal to (<img src="14-75000428\f9e95162-be8d-48df-92a4-3b6d4f078dfc.jpg" />), any energy value corresponding to <img src="14-75000428\08a4bcc8-81ed-4e34-ad2e-0d45c4da5ba3.jpg" /> can be obtained by the values in the range: <img src="14-75000428\73b5d008-6d9c-4f53-a031-57c5b2325592.jpg" />as well.</p><p>Therefore the <img src="14-75000428\ad033e05-f887-48fe-ba9c-9c8494702c56.jpg" /> values in this reduced zone (<img src="14-75000428\a00fb5df-c0a0-4d84-a072-3ea16a37824c.jpg" />) will give us all the possible energy values.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Flux Quantization Argument</title><p>Let us assume that the ground state electron [the electron occupying the (<img src="14-75000428\05da6662-e189-4633-be60-28e18d4b0001.jpg" />) entangled state at<img src="14-75000428\56ef193a-4300-431b-a231-d8fa3a938a8c.jpg" />] is excited to a higher level by the absorption of a single photon. Now we ask: What is quantum flux difference between the final and initial states? Recently Saglam and Sahin [10,11] showed that, depending on its helicity photon carries an intrinsic magnetic moment and hence a quantum flux of <img src="14-75000428\b8f49b2e-84d5-49fc-89b2-0858bfdf41bb.jpg" /> where <img src="14-75000428\3abe687b-9f89-425f-bbf6-82016bf130f2.jpg" /> is the flux quantum. Therefore in the end of a one photon absorption process the quantum flux difference between the final and initial quantum states of electron must be equal to the intrinsic quantum flux of the absorbed photon which is equal to<img src="14-75000428\a8ebffad-5a1c-46a5-b2b9-10a5b40cb6a0.jpg" />. On the other hand Saglam et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.5838-ref15">15</xref>]</p><p>also calculated the quantized magnetic flux through the electronic orbits of Dirac hydrogen atom corresponding to the<img src="14-75000428\63658c2f-7c38-470b-a35e-2a6830618617.jpg" />. It is shown that the quantum flux is given by:<img src="14-75000428\33ebf156-c4b2-426d-832a-7914202c5647.jpg" />. For the present case we have the entangled states with the energies given by (1) where we have (<img src="14-75000428\dcff6298-103f-4032-870f-7f0f325530a2.jpg" />) which stands for<img src="14-75000428\9579e5ce-d3d5-4ec1-9af4-2158b53303ea.jpg" />. Therefore for the present case the quantum flux through the orbits corresponding to the entangled states in hydrogen-like atoms will be given by:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.5838-formula36900"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-75000428\b0fc1011-a560-4596-8049-0d03be435c4c.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We have stated that when the ground state electron is</p><p>excited to a higher level with an absorption of one photon (or more photons) the flux difference between two quantum orbits must be equal to integer multiples of (<img src="14-75000428\c9f947e0-8be7-4fb8-854b-3863996fa7c6.jpg" />). Therefore the difference of the flux in (4) must be equal to integer multiples of (<img src="14-75000428\4b5f3c2e-b4fb-4538-af3a-7a7a9f33d745.jpg" />). In (4), since we have<img src="14-75000428\abce727d-766e-4307-a4a7-83bfea35ea3d.jpg" />, the above requirement is possible</p><p>only when the change of <img src="14-75000428\020634a1-6013-47df-bd88-2691bd7d9afc.jpg" /> between two states is equal to an even integer number:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.5838-formula36901"><label>. (5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-75000428\5af54952-43f4-4ce6-a146-04fb3f15423f.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We have said that in Li atom the ground state electron (2s electron) occupies the entangled state of <img src="14-75000428\d1744ac7-7403-4548-9135-a5c039c471d4.jpg" /> and <img src="14-75000428\8426deeb-5982-4f3b-8832-a2e6be4158c7.jpg" /> at<img src="14-75000428\1dcb96a7-9821-4968-959a-7704eab2b550.jpg" />. Therefore a photonic transition occurs either to the entangled states with <img src="14-75000428\178aa4fd-bda8-4806-bd20-8ea74cac31a6.jpg" /> or<img src="14-75000428\b85b19d4-f761-4198-9111-23acf4acd9c3.jpg" />. In the present study we will consider only <img src="14-75000428\e2b22f9f-e2e7-4522-be36-b11de8a323a0.jpg" /> values up to 10. We will see that in this range (<img src="14-75000428\45d49fae-57f8-49c4-8356-58cf997669ea.jpg" />) we get 26 different energy values which produce 325 wavelengths some of which are the same.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Detailed Calculation of the Zeeman-Fine Energies of Li Atom</title><p>From the (NIST) values, the ionization energy of Li atom is<img src="14-75000428\48e6fb49-a8cf-437f-bf2b-91e783a94f2e.jpg" />, while the smallest amount of energy that allows a transition from the ground state to the nearest excited state(<img src="14-75000428\679fb759-25a2-4590-bf84-db17507edb69.jpg" /><img src="14-75000428\a1e5b185-ab01-44d9-97ff-063dad79d3fc.jpg" /><img src="14-75000428\0aed80aa-173c-46ca-9266-e3c60b0b3387.jpg" />) is equal to <img src="14-75000428\58fbb191-89e1-47f4-bbac-95b54a8798c7.jpg" /></p><p>which corresponds to 6707.91 &#197;. In this transition the initial and the final value of <img src="14-75000428\bfd6e832-14fc-4b17-a216-75b299b13b72.jpg" />is the same and equal to unity:<img src="14-75000428\b894b14d-ca22-4b78-aa7a-1898bb6888ce.jpg" />. Therefore we can write <img src="14-75000428\bf24f8fc-192c-4abb-ab53-76e150ee928b.jpg" /></p><p><img src="14-75000428\2775be8b-c03a-4b8f-a1bc-7a40034d42cb.jpg" />Therefore from (2) the energies of the initial and final states are:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.5838-formula36902"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-75000428\3efff886-d78d-49ba-9b83-a2797ee203d0.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><p><img src="14-75000428\69cb3868-c463-4843-b050-bbd9bad99be2.jpg" />(7)</p><p>respectively. The solutions of (6) and (7) gives us that <img src="14-75000428\64b20772-8ab0-4b27-9570-e82e801730af.jpg" />and<img src="14-75000428\898c93f5-26d1-4975-a003-42b562860ce7.jpg" />. Substitution of these values in (2) gives the Zeeman-fine energies of Li atom:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.5838-formula36903"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-75000428\c7dc4302-f8b4-4f59-91ad-ec13779973f8.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In the present study we will take <img src="14-75000428\7c9d001c-dacd-445f-b328-d500be34e479.jpg" /> values in the range (<img src="14-75000428\fa372d0a-2c0e-42a9-b21f-241fbce03092.jpg" />). For each value of <img src="14-75000428\4c376d8b-e2e5-47c6-a950-8e5856ef0324.jpg" /> substituting the values of <img src="14-75000428\e50356df-7b7c-4610-8d4d-dc81c0aae416.jpg" /> and taking <img src="14-75000428\30816a97-9517-4fd1-98b2-05bd7eba94b6.jpg" /> we get 26 different energy values which are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. These 26 different energy values give us 325 wavelengths some of which are the same. The Doppler shift-corrected wavelengths are in perfect agreement with the observed (NIST) values [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.5838-ref14">14</xref>] for atomic Li (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, we give the comparison between the observed values and the corresponding calculated values which have Doppler shift-correction as well. The Doppler shift-corrected wavelengths are in perfect agreement with the observed (NIST) values for atomic Li.</p></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Calculation of the Dopplershift for Li Atom</title><p>The above calculations are based on the assumption that the center of mass of the Li atom is at rest, but only the outermost electron is moving. But since the experimental</p><table-wrap-group id="1"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Zeeman-fine Energies and related <img src="14-75000428\e17604c5-5341-4ce3-b9b3-184afa0371c3.jpg" /> values for<img src="14-75000428\b510d060-47b1-4f96-a85e-5cb9fbe0450d.jpg" />. (Here <img src="14-75000428\a2f52015-7929-468a-b3d4-a1c0d1ba78c8.jpg" /> states are denoted by s,p,d,f,g,h,… respectively.</title></caption></table-wrap-group><p>results are taken from the moving Li atom, there will be a small difference coming from the Doppler shift. To calculate the Doppler shift we take two different repeated wavelengths from the (NIST) database. For example if we <img src="14-75000428\f785c63d-c321-41da-aefb-e19fe3ffeb1d.jpg" />and<img src="14-75000428\a8546b6c-c5c0-4706-b86f-f21a51d7868d.jpg" />. The corresponding calculated values are <img src="14-75000428\18142a8b-d28d-4407-8ae0-93bf915957a6.jpg" /> and <img src="14-75000428\a3c49f08-b6d7-408b-a08e-1f7d8acf009a.jpg" /> respectively. Now we can calculate the average Doppler shift by using the above values:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.5838-formula36904"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-75000428\53f91915-67dc-416e-9fef-8b5e5dace288.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>So the magnitude of the Doppler shift is found to be</p><table-wrap-group id="2"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Comparision between the observed and Dopplershift-corrected calculated wavelengths</title></caption></table-wrap-group><disp-formula id="scirp.5838-formula36905"><label>. (10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="14-75000428\d5b32c91-c29d-4e2e-8468-d89b547e2290.jpg"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Conclusions</title><p>We have calculated the effective Land&#233; g-factors, <img src="14-75000428\8508c5b0-c005-4b2d-b6de-991941bad906.jpg" />, related to the Zeeman-fine energies and the spectrum of the atomic Lithium (Li) by using the varying effective Land&#233; g-factor method. It is shown the allowed values of <img src="14-75000428\26698cc7-10f9-4e26-8bc1-37c2efa67d36.jpg" /> are restricted only with three odd integers (<img src="14-75000428\7f972653-c445-4a9e-8fc3-7d342ffa1bde.jpg" />) and this result is independent of the limit of the principle quantum number,<img src="14-75000428\56a293c2-0b95-48e7-a349-b51396116c91.jpg" />. In the present study we take the principle quantum number in the range; (<img src="14-75000428\d5023305-4e3c-4662-a1e1-1411c46981e5.jpg" />). For this range we find 26 different energy values and 325 wavelengths some of which are the same. The present calculations are based on the assumption that the center of mass of the Li atom is at rest, but only the outermost electron is moving. But since the experimental results are taken from the moving Li atom, there will be a small difference coming from the Doppler shift. The Doppler shift is found to be<img src="14-75000428\3fe0cbf7-a239-4385-bcc3-04de01111ae4.jpg" />. The Doppler shift-corrected wavelengths are in perfect agreement with the observed (NIST) values for atomic Li. The present results suggest new wavelengths such as</p><p><img src="14-75000428\52c15e0f-a3b8-497d-9bfe-dead9eccf4a0.jpg" />, <img src="14-75000428\4055ddb7-6c51-4168-a9b4-172d64d4be75.jpg" />and <img src="14-75000428\a078ca79-20e9-42f3-92d8-cce178a011a1.jpg" /></p><p>should be observed. Applications of the above treatment can give access to the production of new laser lights from atomic Lithium as well. Extending the range of <img src="14-75000428\016f6c47-507c-4aef-919d-c416e1b10bc7.jpg" /> to (<img src="14-75000428\662769c6-c1e9-4c16-984c-f35022e9b217.jpg" />) will allow us to calculate all the observed wavelengths for Li atom. A more detailed study will be presented in the future.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>REFERENCES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.5838-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">P. J. Mohr, B. N. Taylor and D. B. Newel,"CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2006" Reviews of Modern Physics Vol 80 2008, pp 633-730</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.5838-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">R.C. Hilborn,“Einstein Coefficients, cross sections, f values, dipole moments and all that” ,Am. J. of Phys. Vol 50, 1982, pp. 982-986</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.5838-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. J. Aurie and L. N. Adolph,“Lange's Handbook of Chemistry’’ ,McGraw-Hill, 1998</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.5838-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">W. D. Phillips, “Laser cooling and trapping of neutral atoms”, Nobel Lecture, December 8, 1997</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.5838-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D. E. Pritchard, “Cooling neutral atoms in a magnetic trap for precision spectroscopy” ,Phys. Rev. Letters Vol 51 1983, pp 1336-1339</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.5838-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">B. C., Sanders, “Entangled coherent states”, Phys. Rev. A Vol 45, 1992, pp. 6811-6815</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.5838-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">A. Griffin, D. W. Snoke and S. Stringari, “Bose Einstein Condensation”, Cambridge University Press (1995)</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.5838-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">L. G. Boussiakou, C.R. Bennett and M. Babiker, “Electrodynamics of Bose Einstein Condensates in angular motion”, Journal of Optics B, Vol 4, 2002, pp.S25-S32</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.5838-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Z. Saglam, S. B. Bayram  and M. Saglam, “Calculation of the effective g-factor for the ( )  ( )   ( ) transitions in Hydrogen-like atoms and its application to the atomic Cesium,” J. Mod. Phys.Vol.1, 2010, pp. 399-404 .</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.5838-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">G. Sahin and M. Saglam, “ Calculation of the magnetic moment of Photon,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol.194, 2009,pp.22006.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.5838-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Saglam and G. Sahin, “ Photon in the current loop model,” Int. J.of Mod. Phys. Vol.23(24),2009, pp. 4977-85. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.5838-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Saglam and B. Boyacioglu, “The absence of decimal g-factor in QHE systems,” Physica Status Solidi B, Vol.230, No.1, 2002,pp133-142. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.5838-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Saglam, “ Flux quantization associated with electron spin for correlated electron system  in QHE ,” Physica E, Vol.17, 2003, pp.345-346. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.5838-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">NIST Atomic Spectra Database: http://physics.nist.gov/asd</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.5838-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">M. Saglam, Z. Saglam, B. Boyacioglu and K. K. Wan, “ Quantized magnetic flux through the excited-state orbits of hydrogen atom,” Journal of Russian Laser Research, Vol. 28, No.3, 2007, pp.267-271.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>