<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Modern Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1196</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jmp.2015.68119</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JMP-58358</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Theoretical Study of the Triplet Electronic States of the BP Molecule
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ahdi</surname><given-names>Mansour</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nayla</surname><given-names>El-Kork</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mahmoud</surname><given-names>Korek</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Faculty of Science, Beirut Arab University, Beirut, Lebanon</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Khalifa University, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>fkorek@yahoo.com(MK)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>10</day><month>07</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>08</issue><fpage>1156</fpage><lpage>1161</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>13</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>25</month>	<year>July</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>28</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The Complete Active Space Self Consistent Field (CASSCF) with Multi Reference Configuration Interaction (single and double excitation with Davidson correction) MRCI + Q method has been used to investigate the potential energy curves of the 17 low-lying triplet electronic states of the molecule BP. The harmonic vibrational frequency ω
  <sub>e</sub>, the inter-nuclear distance at equilibrium Re, the rotational constant 
  B<sub>e</sub>, the electronic energy with respect to the minimum ground state energy 
  T<sub>e</sub>, and the permanent dipole moment have been also calculated. A literature review shows a strong correlation between our investigated data and those previously published either theoretically or experimentally. This work introduces, for the first time, a study of 14 new electronic states. Our spectroscopic data can be a conducive to further work on BP molecule in both experimental and theoretical research.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Ab Initio&lt;/i&gt; Calculation</kwd><kwd> Electronic Structure</kwd><kwd> Spectroscopic Constants</kwd><kwd> Potential Energy Curves</kwd><kwd>  Dipole Moments</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Although the molecular III-V family have many unique chemical and physical properties, boron phosphate has a good translucent, good adhesion, smaller index of ionicity and low internal stress level. It also, constitutes an excellent example of an almost perfect covalence heteronuclear diatomic molecule. This low-heteropolarity gives striking features to the BP system. Many experimental studies were done on diatomic molecules by considering either one electronegative and one electropositive atom or two electronegative atoms. From the other side, no extensive studies were done on diatomic molecules of two atoms belonging to electropositive groups [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58358-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58358-ref2">2</xref>] . The boron phosphate has a wide range of applications in refractory materials and solid state physics, and in a new kind of infrared optical materials [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58358-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58358-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>In literature, BP molecule was originally studied by Gingerich et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58358-ref5">5</xref>] . Later, Boldyrev and Simons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58358-ref6">6</xref>] investigated 5 electronic states for the molecule BP. They conclude that the <sup>3</sup>P state is the ground state, while the first excited state <sup>1</sup>S<sup>+</sup> lies 0.3 eV above the ground state. Since the BP molecule has very close electronic states of different multiplicity, there are difficulties for determining its molecular parameters in the fundamental and excited states. Using Bader’s theory of atoms in molecules [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58358-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58358-ref8">8</xref>] , BP compound, in both crystalline and molecular structure, was studied by Mori-S&#225;nchez et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58358-ref9">9</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58358-ref11">11</xref>] . He analyzed the transfer of charge and the polarity inversion under pressure in the electron density of the BP crystal. Mori-S&#225;nchez [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58358-ref11">11</xref>] has analyzed the electron density of the diatomic BP molecule at different computational levels, namely HF, CASSCF and CISD and he found that, a competition between the three states of lower energy <sup>1</sup>S<sup>+</sup>, <sup>3</sup>S<sup>−</sup>, and <sup>3</sup>P and concluded that <sup>3</sup>P is the fundamental state in agreement with the results of Boldyrev and Simons [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58358-ref6">6</xref>] . More theoretical calculations have been done using different techniques as HF, CASSCF, CCSD and FCI [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58358-ref12">12</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58358-ref16">16</xref>] where few spectroscopic constants for the low excited electronic states and the dissociation equilibrium have been obtained.</p><p>The focus of this study is devoted to an accurate description of the ground and electronically excited triplet electronic states. In order to emphasize the accuracy of our work, we used the multi-reference configuration interaction (MRCI+Q) model expansion. The spectroscopic constants R<sub>e</sub>, T<sub>e</sub>, B<sub>e</sub>, ω<sub>e</sub>, …for each of the corresponding electronic states have been investigated along with the static dipole moment.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Method of Calculations</title><p>The correlation energy for a certain state is the difference between the exact eigenvalue of the Hamiltonian and its expectation value in the HF approximation. The configuration interaction (CI) treatment of this electron correlation is obtained by adding to the HF wavefunction terms that represent promotion of electrons from occupied to virtual (unoccupied) orbital that are singly, doubly, and triply excited. Each Slater determinant D, or linear combination of a few determinants, represent an idealized configuration, called configuration state function (CSF). The CI wavefunctions then, are linear combinations of CSFs. The most widely-used implementations of CI are multiconfigurational self consistent field (MCSCF) method. In this method, one writes the molecular wavefunction as a linear combination of CSFs and varies not only the expansion coefficients but also the forms of the molecular orbitals in the CSFs. CASSCF wavefunctions are often used as the starting point for MRCI calculation. When a CASSCF wavefunction is used for a MRCISD calculation, the number of CSFs may be too many to deal with, so one procedure used to reduce the amount of computations is the internally contracted MRCI. The theoretical study of the low-lying singlet and triplet electronic states of the molecule BP have been studied by using the state averaged Complete Active Space Self-Consistent Field (CASSCF) procedure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58358-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58358-ref18">18</xref>] followed by a Multireference Doubly and Singly Configuration Interaction MRDSCI+Q with Davidson correction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58358-ref19">19</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58358-ref22">22</xref>] . The entire CASSCF configuration space was used as the reference in the MRDSCI calculations, which were done via the computational chemistry Program MOLPRO [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58358-ref23">23</xref>] taking advantage of the graphical user interface GABEDIT [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58358-ref24">24</xref>] . This software is intended for high accuracy correlated ab initio calculations. MOLPRO has been run on a PC-computer with LINUX-type operating systems. The boron and phosphorous species are treated in all electron scheme. The basis sets were chosen for s, p and d functions using aug-cc-pCVTZ; c and aug-cc- pVTZ; c for B and P atoms respectively from Molpro library. The CASSCF active space is 6s (B: 2p, 3s; P:3p<sub>0</sub>, 4s, 3d<sub>0</sub>, 4p<sub>0</sub>) and 4p (B:2p<sub>&#177;</sub><sub>1</sub>; P:3p<sub>&#177;</sub><sub>1</sub>, 3d<sub>&#177;</sub><sub>1</sub>, 4p<sub>&#177;</sub><sub>1</sub>) 1d (P:3d<sub>&#177;2</sub>) orbitals in the C<sub>2v</sub> molecular orbitals are distributed into the irreducible representation a<sub>1</sub>, b<sub>1</sub>, b<sub>2</sub> and 1a<sub>2</sub> in the following way 6a<sub>1</sub>, 4b<sub>1</sub>, 4b<sub>2</sub>, 1a<sub>2</sub> noted [6, 4, 4, 1]. The 1s<sup>2</sup> 2s<sup>2</sup> of B and 1s<sup>2</sup> 2s<sup>2</sup> 2p<sup>6</sup> 3s<sup>2</sup> of P atoms were frozen in the MCSCF procedure. The number of active orbitals and valence electrons are 16 and 8 respectively.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>Potential energy curves (PECs) of the 17 triplet electronic states, in the representation <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/14-7502228x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of the molecule BP, has been performed for 189 internuclear distances. These curves are given in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p><p>One can notice the deep potential wells for the low doublet and shallower wells for the higher excited electronic states. Moreover, some crossings and avoided crossings of abscissas R<sub>c</sub> and R<sub>ac</sub> respectively have been obtained between the potential energy curves. If the two curves correspond to states of different symmetry cross where the crossing in this case is strictly allowed. But if these wavefunctions have the same symmetry, the two</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Potential energy curves of the triplet electronic states of the molecule BP</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/14-7502228x7.png"/></fig><p>states will only be diabatic solutions of the problem. They will mix with each other to give two adiabatic solutions which no longer cross and the crossing becomes avoided. The adiabatic solutions of the Schr&#246;dinger equation Y<sub>1</sub> and Y<sub>2</sub> are obtained by linear combinations of the diabatic ones where the variation method is used to solve for the coefficients. Such crossings or avoided crossings can dramatically alter the stability of molecules and the trend of the potential energy curve. From <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, we can find these avoided crossings between the electronic states (1)<sup>3</sup>D/(2)<sup>3</sup>D at 2.23 &#197; and (2)<sup>3</sup>D/(3)<sup>3</sup>D at 2.77 &#197;. More over the wells are absent from some states which are unbound states. The electronic states (2)<sup>3</sup>P presents double wells where we calculated the spectroscopic constants in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. The potential energy curves for the 17 low-lying triplet electronic states of the molecule BP have been calculated using the MRSDCI method in the representation <sup>2s+1</sup>Λ<sup>(&#177;)</sup>. These curves are drawn versus the internuclear distance 1.2 &#197; ≤ R ≤ 5.5 &#197; in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. The equilibrium bond distances R<sub>e</sub>, the harmonic vibrational frequencies ω<sub>e</sub>, the relative energy separations T<sub>e</sub>, and the rotational constants B<sub>e</sub> for these electronic states have been calculated and given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>The comparison of our calculated internuclear distance R<sub>e</sub> for the ground state X<sup>3</sup>P with those given in literature, either experimental or theoretical, shows a very good agreement with relative difference of 0.4% (Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58358-ref16">16</xref>] ) ≤ DR<sub>e</sub>/R<sub>e</sub> ≤ 1.4% (Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58358-ref18">18</xref>] ). Similar very good agreement is obtained by comparing our calculated value of R<sub>e</sub>,</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Spectroscopic constants of the potential wells of the electronic states of the BP molecule</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >States</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>e</sub> (cm<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R<sub>e</sub> (&#197;)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >w<sub>e</sub> (cm<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >B<sub>e</sub> (cm<sup>−1</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >X<sup>3</sup>P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.740<sup>a </sup> 1.7595<sup>b</sup> 1.7478<sup>c1 </sup> 1.7520<sup>c2</sup> 1.7539<sup>d1 </sup> 1.7538<sup>d2</sup> 1.757<sup>e1</sup> 1.764<sup>e2</sup> 1.747<sup>e3</sup> 1.758<sup>f </sup> 1.747<sup>g</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1026.08<sup>a </sup> 941.39<sup> c2</sup> 934.69<sup>d1 </sup> 934.800<sup>d2</sup> 1148<sup>e1</sup> 897<sup>e2</sup> 941<sup>e3 </sup> 1148<sup>f</sup> 973<sup>g</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6985<sup>a </sup> 0.6762<sup>c2</sup> 0.674706<sup>d1 </sup> 0.674727<sup>d2</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(1)<sup>3</sup>Σ<sup>− </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5783.98<sup>a</sup> 6708.3<sup>b </sup> 7612<sup>c1 </sup> 6822<sup>c2 </sup> 7469<sup>c3 </sup> 7412<sup>c4 </sup> 6987.19<sup>d1</sup> 7062.91<sup>d2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.933<sup>a </sup> 1.9730<sup>b</sup> 1.9616<sup>c1 </sup> 1.9690<sup>c2</sup> 1.9623<sup>d1 </sup> 1.963<sup>d2 </sup> 1.9424<sup>e1</sup> 1.9684<sup>e3 </sup> 1.943<sup>f</sup> 1.694<sup>g</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >773.14<sup>a </sup> 633.75<sup>c2 </sup> 636.72<sup>d1 </sup> 642.760<sup>d2</sup> 585<sup>e1 </sup> 634<sup>e3 </sup> 585<sup>f</sup> 925<sup>g</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5622<sup>a </sup> 0.5353<sup>c2</sup> 0.53877<sup>d1 </sup> 0.539617<sup>d2</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(2)<sup>3</sup>Π 1<sup>st</sup> minimum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25628.34<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.903<sup>a </sup> 1.7539<sup>d </sup> 2.019<sup>g</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >892.2<sup>a </sup> 934.748<sup>d </sup> 522<sup>g</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5808<sup>a </sup> 0.674698<sup>d</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(2)<sup>3</sup>Π 2<sup>nd</sup> minimum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30737.85<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.649<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >302.9<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2999<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(3)<sup>3</sup>Φ</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30740.99<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.915<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >798.56<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.574<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(1)<sup>3</sup>Σ<sup>+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33989.58<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.945<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >566.19<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.556<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ><sup></sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36500<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.081<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >184.58<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1069<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(2)<sup>3</sup>Σ<sup>−</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35650<sup>a </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.303<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >153.4<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1923<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(3)<sup>3</sup>Σ<sup>−</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36515<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.502<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >147.56<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.651<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(2)<sup>3</sup>Δ</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36530<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.649<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >175.611<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.690<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(1)<sup>3</sup>Δ</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39173.33<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.968<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >388.4<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5417<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(2)<sup>3</sup>Δ</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42374.78<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.574<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >169.4<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3185<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(2)<sup>3</sup><sup>+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42568.19<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.516</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >413.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.451</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(3)<sup>3</sup>Δ</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42561.9<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.246<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >321.6<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1158<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(2)<sup>3</sup>Σ<sup>+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42371.80<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.557<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >201.36<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.315<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(4)<sup>3</sup>Σ<sup>−</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53812.4<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.914<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >715.09<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.546<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(5)<sup>3</sup>Σ<sup>−</sup> 1<sup>st</sup> minimum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55241.67<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.879<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >143.02<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.595<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(5)<sup>3</sup>Σ<sup>−</sup> 2<sup>nd</sup> minimum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42569.96<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.843<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >573.69<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.804<sup>a</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>a</sup>Present theoretical study. <sup>b</sup>Ref [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58358-ref15">15</xref>] , <sup>c</sup>Ref [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58358-ref16">16</xref>] , <sup>d</sup>Ref [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58358-ref17">17</xref>] , <sup>e</sup>Ref [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58358-ref18">18</xref>] , <sup>f</sup>Ref [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58358-ref6">6</xref>] , <sup>g</sup>Ref [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58358-ref12">12</xref>] .</p><p>for the first excited state (1)<sup>3</sup>Σ<sup>−</sup>, with those given in literature where the relative difference is 1.5% (Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58358-ref16">16</xref>] ) ≤ DR<sub>e</sub>/R<sub>e</sub> ≤ 2.1% (Ref. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58358-ref15">15</xref>] ), while this relative difference becomes DR<sub>e</sub>/R<sub>e</sub> = 7.7% for the state (2)<sup>3</sup>Π.</p><p>One can notice the large discrepancy between the given values for the harmonic frequency ω<sub>e</sub> in literature, but our calculated value is found to be between the highest and lowest values as 934.69 cm<sup>−1</sup> &lt; 1026.1 cm<sup>−1</sup> &lt; 1148 cm<sup>−1</sup>. While our calculated value of w<sub>e</sub> is greater than those given in literature for the electronic state (1)<sup>3</sup>Σ<sup>−</sup> and smaller for the state (2)<sup>3</sup>Π. The investigated values of the rotational constant B<sub>e</sub> in literature are in very good agreement with our calculated values for the 2 electronic states X<sup>3</sup>Π and (1)<sup>3</sup>Σ<sup>−</sup> and larger for the (2)<sup>3</sup>Π state. The calculated value of the energy T<sub>e</sub> with respect to the ground state is in an acceptable agreement with the theoretical data given in literature. From this agreement between our investigated data and those calculated in literature we can pretend the accuracy of the new constants obtained for these investigated new electronic excited states.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Permanent Dipole Moment</title><p>The electric dipole moment function R<sub>e</sub>(r) of a molecule is given by:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.58358-formula335"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/14-7502228x8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/14-7502228x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/14-7502228x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are respectively the electronic wavefunctions of the two different electronic states and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/14-7502228x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the permanent dipole moment. This permanent dipole moments is investigated for the considered electronic states of the molecule BP by taking the boron (B) atom at the origin, and the phosphorus (P) atom moves along the positive z-axis. All the calculations were performed with the MOLPRO [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58358-ref23">23</xref>] program. The dipole moment operator is among the most reliably predicted physical properties, because the quantum mechanical operator is a simple sum of one-electron operators. The expectation value of this operator is sensitive to the nature of the least energetic and most chemically relevant valence electrons. The positive sign of the dipole moment corresponds to a charge transfer from the P atom towards the B atom. To obtain the best accuracy, MRCI wavefunctions were constructed using MCSCF active space. The values of the dipole moments for the investigated electronic states are given in atomic unites (a.u.) as a function of the internuclear distance R in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p><p>At large internuclear distances, the dipole moment of all the investigated electronic states either tends to a small constant indicating a nearly covalent character of the corresponding state or it smoothly approaches zero which is theoretically the correct behavior for a molecule that dissociates into natural fragments.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>In the present work, ab initio investigation for 17 low-lying electronic states in the representation <sup>2s+1</sup>Λ<sup>(+/−)</sup> of the</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Dipole moment curves of the triplet electronic states of the molecule BP</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/14-7502228x12.png"/></fig><p>BP molecule was computed via CASSCF/MRSDCI methods for the electronic excited states. The potential energy curves, the electronic energy with respect to the ground state T<sub>e</sub>, the harmonic frequency ω<sub>e</sub>, the internuclear distance R<sub>e</sub> have been calculated along with the rotational constant B<sub>e</sub>. The comparisons of the present results with the available values in the literature show an overall a very good agreement. To the best of our knowledge, 14 new electronic states have been investigated for the first time through this work. With the recent interest on this molecule through, the present study of these new excited electronic states may assist in searching for bound states of the BP molecule, which leads to more investigation of new experimental works on this molecule.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>MahdiMansour,NaylaEl-Kork,MahmoudKorek, (2015) Theoretical Study of the Triplet Electronic States of the BP Molecule. Journal of Modern Physics,06,1156-1161. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2015.68119</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.58358-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Huber, K.P. and Herzberg, G. (1979) Molecular Spectra and Molecular Structure. Vol. 4, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-0961-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58358-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hirota, E. (1992) Chemical Reviews, 92, 141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cr00009a006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58358-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, G.F. (1995) Infrared Technology, 5, 23.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58358-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Min, X.M., Cai, K.F. and Nan, C.W. (1998) Chinese Journal of Computation Physics, 15, 445.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58358-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gingerich, K.A. (1972) The Journal of Chemical Physics, 56, 4239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1677849</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58358-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boldyrev, A.I. and Simons, J. (1993) The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 97, 6149-6154.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/j100125a011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58358-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bader, R.F. (1990) Atom in Molecules: A Quantum Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58358-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bader, R.F. (1994) Physical Review B, 49, 13348. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.49.13348</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58358-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pendás, A.M., Blanco, M.A., Costales, A., Mori-Sánchez, P. and Lua&amp;#241;a, P. (1999) Physical Review Letters, 83, 1930.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1930</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58358-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mori-Sánchez, P. and Lua&amp;#241;a, V. (2001) Physical Review B, 63, 125103.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.63.125103</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58358-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mori-Sánchez, P. (2002) Densidad electrónica y enlace químico. De la molécula al cristal. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de Oviedo, Asturias.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58358-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Miguel, B., Omar, S., Mori-Sánchez, P. and Garc&amp;#237;a de la Vega, J.M. (2003) Chemical Physics Letters, 381, 720-724. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2003.09.153</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58358-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aguado, A., Garc&amp;#237;a de la Vega, J.M. and Miguel, B. (1997) Journal of the Chemical Society, 93, 29-32.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58358-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Garc&amp;#237;a de la Vega, J.M. and Miguel, B. (2000) Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, 104, 189-194. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002140000134</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58358-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gan, Z.T., Grant, D.J., Harrison, R.J. and Dixon, D.A. (2006) The Journal of Chemical Physics, 125, Article ID: 124311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2335446</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58358-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Linguerri, R., Komiha, N., Oswald, R., Mitrushchenkov, A. and Rosmus, P. (2008) Chemical Physics, 346, 1-7. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2008.01.012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58358-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, W.B., Kun, Y., Zhang, X.M. and Liu, Y.F. (2014) Acta Physica Sinica, 63, Article ID: 073302.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58358-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shinsuke, H. (2008) Theoretical Study of Electronic Structure and Spectroscopy of Molecules Containing Metallic Atoms. Ph.D. Thesis, Universite Paris-Est, Paris.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58358-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Werner, H.J. and Knowles, P.J. (1988) The Journal of Chemical Physics, 89, 5803. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.455556</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58358-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Knowles, P.J. and Werner, H.-J. (1988) Chemical Physics Letters, 145, 514-522. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(88)87412-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58358-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Langhoff, S.R. and Davidson, E.R. (1974) International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, 8, 61-72. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qua.560080106</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58358-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Richartz, A., Buenker, R.J. and Peyerimhoff, S.D. (1978) Chemical Physics, 28, 305-312. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0301-0104(78)80007-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58358-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Werner, H.J., Knowles, P.J., Lindh, R., Manby, F.R., Schütz, M., Celani, P., Korona, T., Rauhut, G., Amos, R.D., Bernhardsson, A., Berning, A., Cooper, D.L., Deegan, M.J.O., Dobbyn, A.J., Eckert, F., Hampel, C., Hetzer, G., Lloyd, A.W., McNicholas, S.J., Meyer, W., Mura, M.E., Nicklass, A., Palmieri, P., Pitzer, R., Schumann, U., Stoll, H., Stone, A.J., Tarroni, R. and Thorsteinsson, T. (2012) MOLPRO: A Package of Ab-Initio Programs.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58358-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Allouche, A.R. (2010) Journal of Computational Chemistry, 32, 174-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcc.21600</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>