<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJAnes</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Anesthesiology</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2164-5531</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojanes.2015.57027</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJAnes-58171</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Medicine&amp;Healthcare</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Subcutaneous Dissociative Conscious Sedation (sDCS) an Alternative Method of Anesthesia for Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ihan</surname><given-names>J. Javid</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zoha</surname><given-names>Alinejad</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Asghar</surname><given-names>Hajipour</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Zahra</surname><given-names>Khazaeipour</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, Imam Khomeini Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Anesthesiology, Imam Khomeini Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>mihanjavid@yahoo.com(IJJ)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>15</day><month>07</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>149</fpage><lpage>154</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>13</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2014</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>19</month>	<year>July</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>22</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Objective: Current randomized clinical trial was conducted to compare the efficacy and side effects of dissociative conscious sedation and conscious sedation in patients under bronchoscopy. Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 110 patients scheduled for Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy in a training hospital in 2012 were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either SC ketamine plus IV fentanyl (dissociative conscious sedation) or placebo plus IV fentanyl (conscious sedation) and the efficacy and side effects were assessed and compared. Results: There was significant difference between systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate in two groups and more stability was shown in dissociative conscious sedation group (P &lt; 0.05). Also the incidence of cough, the need to extra dose of fentanyl and recall showed less frequency in dissociative conscious sedation group (P &lt; 0.05). Conclusions: Totally, according to the obtained results, it may be concluded that Subcutaneous Dissociative Conscious Sedation (sDCS) in comparison to Conscious Sedation is significantly more efficient accompanied by less side effects in fiberoptic bronchoscopy and using this method is recommended. Implication of the Manuscript: The study was designed in order to evaluate the efficacy of subcutaneous Dissociative Conscious Sedation (sDCS) Method in fiberoptic bronchoscopy.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Subcutaneous Dissociative Conscious Sedation</kwd><kwd> Ketamine</kwd><kwd> Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Fiberoptic bronchoscopy is an essential common diagnostic method for lung diseases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58171-ref1">1</xref>] . The procedure is an invasive procedure and enough sedation is required [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58171-ref2">2</xref>] . Patients who are candidate for bronchoscopy are involved with respiratory problems. Airway manipulation in such patients may result in exacerbation of respiratory problems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58171-ref3">3</xref>] . However, maintaining the tone of airway muscles and patient cooperation are necessary for successful and safe procedure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58171-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>To prevent respiratory complication we have to induce light sedation or partial unconsciousness [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58171-ref5">5</xref>] which is accompanied by unsuccessful procedure and non-satisfied patient and operator.</p><p>Concomitant use of opioids and benzodiazepines will result in respiratory problem [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58171-ref6">6</xref>] . Intravenous ketamine is an analgesic drug without severe respiratory problems but is not a common modality due to severe hallucination [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58171-ref7">7</xref>] . Subcutaneous Dissociative Conscious Sedation (DCS) is a safe method for painful procedures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58171-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58171-ref9">9</xref>] . It will result in patient’s cooperation accompanied by analgesia and enough sedation. Induction of conscious sedation by ketamine via subcutaneous rout was described for the first time by Javid et al in 2009 in “Airway management and Anesthesia in head and neck surgery” congress and then it was introduced as an alternative to airway blocks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58171-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58171-ref10">10</xref>] . Efficacy and safety of this method have been previously established and will result in patients’ cooperation. Then this study was designed in order to compare subcutaneous Dissociative Conscious Sedation (sDCS) with Conscious Sedation in fiberoptic bronchoscopy.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods and Materials</title><p>In this double-blind randomized clinical trial, 110 patients (age 18 - 65 years and ASA classes of I-III), scheduled for fiberoptic bronchoscopy were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either SC ketamine plus IV fentanyl (Dissociative Conscious Sedation) or placebo plus IV fentanyl (conscious sedation) and the efficacy and side effects were assessed and compared. The fentanyl dose was 2 ug/kg and up to 3 ug/kg if needed. The dose of subcutaneous Ketamine was 0.5 mg/kg. The nasopharyngeal anesthesia was induced by 2 ml of intranasal lidocaine and 4% lidocaine spray. In non-cooperative subjects, extra doses of fentanyl were administered incrementally up to 3 ug/kg. If the patient was not cooperative enough yet to continue the procedure after administration of extra doses of fentanyl up to 3 ug/kg, the patient was excluded.</p><p>Narcotic abuse, uncontrolled hypertension, psychological diseases and untreated ischemic heart disease and increased ICP were the exclusion criteria. The informed consent form was signed by all the patients. All bronchoscopies were performed by the same operator. All SC injections were performed on the anterior aspect of forearm. The procedure was initiated 10 minutes after induction of sedation. The opioid injection was performed titrated.</p><p>In cases of nausea and vomiting metoclopramide (10 mg) was administered.</p><p>The randomization was by block method and was concealed by anesthesiology resident. The patient and other personnel and also the operator were not informed about the used method for each patient. The consciousness level, heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, arterial blood oxygen, and electrocardiography were checked. Also the recovery time was recorded in both groups.</p><p>Patient’s and endoscopist’s satisfaction were also evaluated at the end of the procedure. Cough reflex and swallow reflex were evaluated. Apnea, desaturation, nausea and vomiting were recorded.</p><p>Data analysis was performed among 110 subjects including 55 patients in intervention group and 55 subjects in control group. Data analysis was performed by SPSS (version 13.0) software [Statistical Procedures for Social Sciences; Chicago, Illinois, USA]. Chi-Square, Fisher, Independent-Sample T, and Repeated-Measure ANOVA test were used and were considered statistically significant at P values less than 0.05.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>The mean age was 40.6 and 39.2 years in ketamine and placebo groups, respectively (P &gt; 0.05). 74.5% and 60% were male in ketamine and placebo groups, respectively (P &gt; 0.05). As shown in Figures 1-4 the heart rate, oxygen saturation, and systolic and diastolic blood pressures were significantly differed between groups (P &lt; 0.05). All side effects except apnea and swallowing reflex were significantly differed across the groups (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Patients satisfaction rate was 78.2% in ketamine group and 12.7% in placebo group (P = 0.0001) and the operator satisfaction rate was 90.2% and 18.2% in ketamine and placebo groups respectively (P = 0.0001).</p><p>No hallucination was observed in groups. The incidence of recall was significantly lower in ketamine group.</p><p>Fentanyl dose was significantly lower in ketamine group (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Systolic blood pressure changes across the groups</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1920306x6.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Diastolic blood pressure changes across the groups</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1920306x7.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Heart rate changes across the groups</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1920306x8.png"/></fig><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> O2 Saturation changes across the groups</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-1920306x9.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Side effects across the groups</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Side effect</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Group</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >P Value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ketamine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Placebo</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cough*</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >94.5%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.022</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Swallowing Reflex</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.1%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.7%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Apnea</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >&gt;0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nausea and Vomiting</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.7%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.7%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.012</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Recall</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.5%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.5%</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>*Cough was severe in 2.3% of Ketamine group and 59.6% in control group.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Numeric variables in two groups</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Variable</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Group</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >P Value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ketamine</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Placebo</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fentanyl Dose (ug)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >140.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0001</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Recovery Time</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>This study demonstrated that systolic and diastolic blood pressures and heart rate were significantly different between groups and cardiovascular stability was significantly higher in ketamine group. Analgesic consumption was significantly lower in dissociative group (P &lt; 0.05).</p><p>Javid et al [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58171-ref8">8</xref>] introduced Dissociative Conscious Sedation instead of general anesthesia for laparoscopic peritoneal catheter insertion. The procedure was optimal in all patients and also the systolic blood pressure was lower in SC ketamine compared with IV ketamine group. The authors were concluded that method was considered as an alternative method for general anesthesia. High cardiovascular stability was observed in sDCS group [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58171-ref9">9</xref>] and this was in congruence with our study. DCS is a safe and optimal method for conscious patients and has been used as an alternative to airway regional blocks [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58171-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>New strategies for difficult airway in surgery and anesthesia would result in more patients’ safety and less mortality and morbidity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58171-ref11">11</xref>] . Ketamine would result in endothelin release and consequently less airway constriction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58171-ref12">12</xref>] . The SC ketamine would have lower cardiovascular side effects by reduction of intraoperative blood pressure compared with other treatments [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58171-ref8">8</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58171-ref11">11</xref>] . IM injection also showed more cardiac protection compared with IV modality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58171-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58171-ref14">14</xref>] . This method was recommended to use because of less cardiac events [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58171-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58171-ref14">14</xref>] . Intravenous ketamine is a good modality but may result in fewer acceptances by both patient and physician [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58171-ref7">7</xref>] . Using SC ketamine in ICU patients demonstrated that fentanyl was accompanied by morestable hemodynamic [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58171-ref9">9</xref>] . This method is safe and optimal and could be recommended as a non-invasive method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58171-ref10">10</xref>] . Javid et al found the sDCS method suitable in patients with predicted difficult airway [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58171-ref10">10</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>Totally, according to the obtained results, it may be concluded that use of subcutaneous ketamine plus narcotic (subcutaneous dissociative conscious sedation) in comparison to placebo plus narcotic (conscious sedation) will result in significantly more efficacy and low side effects in fiberoptic bronchoscopy and its use is recommended.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Financial Support</title><p>The study was supported by Tehran University of Medical sciences Research center.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Mihan J.Javid,ZohaAlinejad,AsgharHajipour,ZahraKhazaeipour, (2015) Subcutaneous Dissociative Conscious Sedation (sDCS) an Alternative Method of Anesthesia for Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy. Open Journal of Anesthesiology,05,149-154. doi: 10.4236/ojanes.2015.57027</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.58171-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Balfour-Lynn, I.M. and Spencer, H. (2002) Bronchoscopy—How and When? Paediatric Respiratory Reviews, 3, 255-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1526-0542(02)00195-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58171-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">De Blic, J. and Scheinmann, P. (1992) Fibreoptic Bronchoscopy in Infants. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 67, 159-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/adc.67.2.159</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58171-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adwan, H., Wigfield, C.H., Clark, S. and Barnard, S. (2008) Interventional Bronchoscopy for Benign Tracheobronchial Diseases under Cardiopulmonary Bypass Support: Case Reports and Literature Review. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 3, 27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-3-27</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58171-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mak, V.H., Johnston, I.D., Hetzel, M.R. and Grubb, C. (1990) Value of Washings and Brushings at Fibreoptic Bronchoscopy in the Diagnosis of Lung Cancer. Thorax, 45, 373-376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thx.45.5.373</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58171-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ninane, V. (2001) Bronchoscopic Invasive Diagnostic Techniques in the Cancer Patient. Current Opinion in Oncology, 13, 236-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001622-200107000-00005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58171-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kirkpatrick, M.B., Smith, J.R., Hoffman, P.J. and Middleton, R.M. 3rd. (1992) Bronchoscope Damage and Repair Costs: Results of a Regional Postal Survey. Respiratory Care, 37, 1256-1259.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58171-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rozman, A., Duh, S., Petrinec-Primozic, M. and Triller, N. (2009) Flexible Bronchoscope Damage and Repair Costs in a Bronchoscopy Teaching Unit. Respiration, 77, 325-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000188788</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58171-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Javid, M.J., Rahimi, M. and Keshavarzi, A. (2010) Dissociative Conscious Sedation, an Alternative to General Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Implantation: A Randomized Trial Comparing Intravenous and Subcutaneous Ketamine. Peritoneal Dialysis International, 31, 308-314.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58171-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oshima, E., Tei, K., Kayazawa, H. and Urabe, N. (1990) Continuous Subcutaneous Injection of Ketamine for Cancer Pain. Journal of Anesthesia, 37, 385-360.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58171-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Javid, M.J. (2011) Subcutaneous Dissociative Conscious Sedation (sDCS) an Alternative Method for Air Way Regional Blocks: A New Approach. BMC Anesthesiology, 11, 19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-11-19</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58171-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Peterson, G.N., Domino, K.B., Caplan, R.A., Posner, K.L., Lee, L.A. and Cheney, F.W. (2005) Management of the Difficult Airway: A Closed Claims Analysis. Anesthesiology, 103, 33-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200507000-00009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58171-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sato, T., Hirota, K., Matsuki, A., Zsigmond, E.K. and Rabito, S.F. (1997) The Relaxant Effect of Ketamine on Guinea Pig Airway Smooth Muscle Is Epithelium-Independent. Anesthesia &amp; Analgesia, 84, 641-647.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58171-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hagihiva, S., Takashina, M. and Mashimo, T. (2008) Application of a Newly Designed Right-Sided, Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tube in Patients with a Very Short Right Mainstem Bronchus. Anesthesiology, 109, 565-568. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31818344bd</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58171-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ostermann, M.E., Keenan, S.P., Seiferling, R.A. and Sibbad, W.J. (2000) Sedation in the Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283, 1451-1490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.11.1451</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>