<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJAS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Animal Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2161-7597</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojas.2015.53038</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJAS-58163</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Effects of Plant Tannin Extracts Supplementation on Animal Performance and Gastrointestinal Parasites Infestation in Steers Grazing Winter Wheat
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>.</surname><given-names>R. Min</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>K.</surname><given-names>Hernandez</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>W.</surname><given-names>E. Pinchak</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>R.</surname><given-names>C. Anderson</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>J.</surname><given-names>E. Miller</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>E.</surname><given-names>Valencia</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Plains Agricultural Research Center, Food and Feed Safety Research Unit, College Station, USA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff5"><addr-line>Department of Pathological Science, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, USA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>College of Agricultural Sciences, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez, Puerto Rico</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, USA</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Vernon, USA</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>bpinchak@ag.tamu.edu(WEP)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>15</day><month>05</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>343</fpage><lpage>350</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>23</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>19</month>	<year>July</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>22</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Twenty-six stocker cattle (286.1 
  <b>&#177;</b> 25.7 kg) were used to quantify the effect of commercial plant tannin extracts (control vs. mimosa and chestnut tannins) on animal performance, gastrointestinal parasites control and plasma metabolite changes in heifers grazing winter wheat forage (
  Triticum aestivum L. var. “cutter”). The forage biomass and crude protein content were generally similar among treatments. Initial live-weight (LW) was similar among treatments, although final LW (
  P = 0.1) and average daily gain (ADG; 
  P &lt; 0.01) differed. Logarithmic (log) fecal egg counts (FEC) for Haemonchus contortus was higher (
  P &lt; 0.02) for mimosa tannins group than for control group, and chestnut tannins group was intermediate in cattle grazing wheat forage on day 35. Logarithmic FEC for 
  Ostertagia was lower (
  P &lt; 0.05) for chestnut tannins group than for both control and mimosa tannins group on day 41. However, log FEC for Cooperia was lower (
  P &lt; 0.04) for mimosa tannins than for both control and chestnut tannins group. Blood parameters were similar among treatments, except cholesterol level on day 70. Blood cholesterol level was higher (
  P &lt; 0.02) for chestnut tannins group than for control, and intermediate for mimosa tannins. However, cholesterol level was similar among treatment after 20 days cessation of tannins treatments. Our data suggest that heifers grazing winter wheat forage supplemented with plant tannins rather than control (non-tannins group) increased ADG (8% to 19%) for mimosa and chestnut tannins groups, respectively with no detectable detrimental effects on animal health. The increase in ADG may be due to decrease fecal parasites infections.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Average Daily Gain</kwd><kwd> Gastrointestinal Parasites</kwd><kwd> Steer</kwd><kwd> Tannins</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Gastrointestinal parasite infections are natural occurring components of pastoral grazing systems and many internal parasite species have developed resistance to anthelmintic drugs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref1">1</xref>] . Gastrointestinal parasites infection cause major production losses in grazing cattle with the greatest reduction occurring in young growing cattle, which normally have limited immunity to nematode parasites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref2">2</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref4">4</xref>] . Choosing yearling stocker cattle as an internal parasites infestation model allows the extension of our model to broad range of stocker cattle production systems in Southern US. Alternative anthelmintic chemistries are needed even in conventional systems because of increasing parasite resistance to contemporary synthetic anthelmintics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>Natural plant tannins have been documented to control intestinal parasites in ruminants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref7">7</xref>] . Molan et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref9">9</xref>] have shown that tannin extracted from forages had the ability to inhibit the larval motility and eggs hatching rate in vitro. Previous scientific reviews have shown that a threshold of at least 2% to 4% tannins per kg dry matter in diet has to be reached to observe anti-parasitic activity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref10">10</xref>] . It has been shown that condensed tannins (quebracho tannins; 40 g/kg body weight) was ineffective in sheep against the Trichinella spiralis nematode, whereas worm burdens of Nippostrongylus brasiliensis were significantly reduced [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref11">11</xref>] . However, the excess consumption of plant tannins extracts can be negatively affected host animals. Studies need to be carried out worldwide, to identify tannin compounds and the associated mechanisms of their mode of actions understood, in order to determine for their use in internal parasites control.</p><p>The benefits of tannins in the diets to affect digestion of tannins-free diets have facilitated research involving other dietary tannins compounds such as commercially available mimosa and chestnut tannins. We hypothesize commercially available plant tannin extracts would be effective in controlling internal parasites infestation and increasing average daily gain (ADG) in growing stocker cattle. The objectives of this study were to examine the animal performance, internal parasites, and blood metabolites effects of hydrolysable tannin-rich chestnut and condensed tannin-rich mimosa extracts applied as a feed additive to stocker cattle.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Experimental Design and Protocol</title><p>Twenty-six stocker cattle (Angus &#215; Hereford &#215; Brangus; 286.1 &#177; 25.7 kg) were used to quantify the effect of plant tannins (control vs. mimosa and chestnut tannins) on animal performance and animal health (internal parasites and plasma metabolites) in heifers grazing winter wheat forage. Animals were randomly allocated to 1 of 3 treatments that included a control (non-tannins group; texture feed only) and two types of tannins (mimosa and chestnut tannins). The study was conducted at the West Walker Unit of the Texas Agricultural Research Center, Vernon, TX from February to April during 70 days. After a 30 day adjustment period to grazing wheat forage, cattle were dewormed (Moxidectin; 10 mL/100 kg BW; Fort Dodge Animal Health, Fort Dodge, Iowa). Cattle were weighted at 10 days intervals. Plant tannins (1.5% of DMI) were supplemented by once daily mixing extract with a textured feed carrier (500 g/steer) at approximately 0800 h. The mixed ration consisted of steam- flaked milo (85 kg), hominy feed (10 kg), and molasses (5 kg/100kg DM) on an as-feed basis.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Experimental Parasites Infection and Fecal Egg Counts</title><p>Two weeks after treated with Moxidectin, all animals were experimentally-infected (March 15) with infective stage of larvae (L<sub>3</sub>) by a single feed-through infection mixed with Cooperia (3000), Ostertagia ostertagi (2000), and Haemonchus contortus (1000) larvae per animal (day 0). The nematodes larvae were collected from infected donor cattle and provided by Dr. J. E. Miller, Louisiana State University, LA. Individual parasites larvae and fecal eggs were morphologically confirmed according to the methods of Merck Veterinary Manual [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref13">13</xref>] .</p><p>Fecal samples (n = 4) were collected (every 10 to 15 days) rectally and examined for fecal egg counts (FEC; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref13">13</xref>] ).</p><p>Blood samples was taken (5 ml) and analyzed by Vet Scan (Mammalian Liver Profile; VS2; 3240 Whipple Rd., Union City, CA) to quantify Alkaline phosphatase (liver, bone, parathyroid, and intestinal disease), Alanine aminotransferase (liver and heart diseases including viral hepatitis and cirrhosis), Gamma glutamyl transferase (primary and secondary liver tumors), bile acids (hepatobiliary disease), total bilirubin (hepatic disorders), blood urea nitrogen (liver and kidney disease), and total cholesterol levels. The endoscopic examination (Olympus CLK-3; Cold light supply, Olympus Optical Co. Ltd., Japan) from esophagus were performed all the animals with a local veterinary (Vernon, Vet Clinic, Vernon, TX) at the end of trial and 30 days after the cessation of experiment to quantify any lesions related to tannin extract supplementation.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Statistical Analyses</title><p>Data from each experiment were analyzed by the MIXED procedure (SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.), and differences in log mean FEC/mg was determined by a repeated-measures analysis of variance. The variables in experiment included forage chemical composition, live-weight (LW), average daily gain (ADG), FEC, and plasma blood parameters. The model included sources of plant extracts (mimosa vs. chestnut tannins) and time. The replicate was treated as a random variable. The FEC was log transformed prior to analysis.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Forage Mass, Forage Chemical Composition and Body Weight Gain</title><p>Animals were grazed during a vegetative state and early reproductive stage of wheat forage during the experiment. The forage biomass and crude protein content were generally similar among treatments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Initial LW was similar among treatments, although final LW (P = 0.1) and ADG (P &lt; 0.01) were differed (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Fecal Egg Counts</title><p>There was no significant interaction between date and source of tannins on FEC. Logarithmic FEC for H. contortus was greater (P &lt; 0.02) for mimosa tannins group than for control group, and chestnut tannins group was intermediate after day 35 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>), indicating that those tannins supplemented at 1.5% DMI did not inhibit H. contortus larval establishment in host animals. Logarithmic FEC for O. ostertagi was lower (P &lt; 0.05) for chestnut tannins group than for control group on day 41. In comparison, log FEC for Cooperia was lower (P &lt; 0.04) for mimosa tannins than for control group.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Effects of Plant Tannins on the Blood Parameters and Endoscopic Examination</title><p>As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, blood parameters were similar among treatments, except cholesterol level on day 70.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Forage chemical composition, biomass and animal body weight (BW) change, and average daily gain (ADG) in steers grazing winter wheat (February 13 to April 24), Vernon, TX</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Item</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >MCT</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CCT</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Control</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SEM</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Biomass (kg DM/ha)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1283</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1032</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1141</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >122.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crude protein (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BW change (70 day)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Initial BW</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >325.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >335.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >331.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.83</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Final BW</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >408.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >434.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >399.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ADG (g/day)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.84<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>MCT: mimosa tannins, CCT: chestnut tannins.<sup> a,b,c</sup>Numbers in a row with superscript letters are significantly different (P &lt; 0.05).</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Logarithmic means of Haemonchus contortus, Ostertagia ostertagi, and Cooperia fecal egg counts in steers grazing winter wheat forage with or without supplementation of commercial tannins</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Item</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Control</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mimosa</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Chestnut</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SEM</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P-value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Haemonchus contortus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day 0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.74</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day 20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day 35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.44<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.06<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day 41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.58</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SEM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ostertagia ostertagi</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day 0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day 20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day 35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.26</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day 41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SEM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cooperia + others</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day 0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day 20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day 35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.28<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.63<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.26<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Day 41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.97<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.47<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.66<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SEM</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Interaction</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >HC</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >OS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cooperia</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Date (D)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sources of tannins (T)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >D &#215; T</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Steers were grazed winter wheat forage during the 70 days with and without tannins supplementation. Infective third (L<sub>3</sub>) stage of larvae mixtures Haemonchus contortus (HC), Ostertagia ostertagi (OS), and Cooperia were artificially infected with feed through. <sup>a,b,c</sup>Numbers in a row with superscript letters are significantly different (P &lt; 0.05).</p><p>Blood cholesterol level was higher (P &lt; 0.02) for chestnut tannins group than for control, and intermediate for mimosa tannins. However, cholesterol level was similar among treatments after 20 days cessation of tannins treatments. After 20 days cessation of tannins treatment, total bilirubin was higher (P &lt; 0.02) for mimosa than for control, while blood urea nitrogen was higher (P &lt; 0.02) for control than for chestnut tannins group.</p><p>Esophageal endoscopic evaluation of all cattle at the end of the trial (day 70) indicated that heifers received with or without plant tannins had no lesions observed on esophagus measured by endoscopic examination (Data not shown).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>The most significant findings in this study were that heifers grazing winter wheat forage supplemented with plant tannins rather than control (non-tannins group) 8% to 19% increased ADG for mimosa and chestnut tannins groups, respectively with no discernable detrimental effects on blood chemistry or the esophagus. The increase in ADG may be due to decreases in both Cooperia and O. ostertagi fecal parasites infections. The significant reduction of FEC in both Cooperia and O. ostertagi after day 35 or 41 suggests that length of feeding time is required to give maximum response in internal parasites infestation.</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> The effect of plant tannins supplementation on plasma blood parameters in steers grazing winter wheat forage</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Control</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Control</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mimosa</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Chestnut</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >SEM</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P-value</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Tannins treatment period (after 70 days tannins administration)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ALP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >181.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >180.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >162</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ALT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GGT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TBIL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ALB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BUN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CHOL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.6<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.2<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.4<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Non-tannins treatment period</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(20 days cessation of tannins administration on wheat pasture)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ALP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >149.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >135.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >129.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ALT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >GGT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >TBIL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.61<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ALB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >BUN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.1<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.7<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.9<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CHOL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Interaction</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ALP</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ALT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >GGT</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BA</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >TBIL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ALB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >BUN</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CHOL</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Period (P)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Source of tannins (T)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P &#215; T</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.29</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Steers were grazed winter wheat forage during the 70 days with tannins supplementation. Animals were continues grazed on wheat forage after the cessation of tannins administration, and the last blood samples were taken 20 days thereafter. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), liver, bone, parathyroid and intestinal disease; alanine aminotransferase (ALT), liver diseases including viral hepatitis, cirrhosis, and heart diseases; gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), liver disease, primary and secondary liver tumors; bile acids (BA), hepatobiliary disease, portosystemic anomaly, and extraheptic; total bilirubin (TBIL), hepatic disorders; albumin, liver and kidney disease; blood urea nitrogen (BUN), liver and kidney disease; total cholesterol (CHOL). <sup>a,b,c</sup>Numbers in a row with superscript letters are significantly different (P &lt; 0.05).</p><p>In the present study, both mimosa and chestnut tannins did not have inhibiting effect on H. contortus fecal egg output, but Cooperia and Ostertagia fecal egg output were reduced in heifers supplemented with both tannin extracts. When established adult nematodes were exposed to condensed tannins in sheep, a reduction in worm fecundity and worm numbers was observed for the intestinal species (Nematodirus battus and Trichostrongylus colubriformis), whereas no changes were recorded for the species that resides in the stomach and abomasums (Teladorsagia circumcincta and H. contortus; [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref14">14</xref>] ). It has been shown that dietary quebracho tannins (40 g/kg LW) was ineffective in sheep against the mucosal dewelling nematode, Trichinella spiralis, whereas worm burdens of Nippostrongylus brasiliensis, a lumen dweller, were significantly reduced [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref11">11</xref>] . It is possible that the effectiveness of plant tannin extracts against H. contortus may due to the short time period that the larvae were exposed to gut contents before embedding in the small intestinal mucosa, known to be &lt;30 min [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref11">11</xref>] , indicating that direct contact between the tannins and the nematodes may be necessary in order to reduce worm burden or larval establishment in host animals. Conversely, Min et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref7">7</xref>] reported that condensed tannins-containing Sericea lespedeza (15.2% condensed tannins) diet in goats reduced 89% of H. contortus population in the abomasums than those grazing non-tannins containing forage, indicating that possibility of direct or indirect mechanisms, increase protein supply and immune response against worms, contributing to the anthelmintic properties of different types of tannins cannot be discards.</p><p>Cooperia fecal eggs were reduced 8% to 13% by mimosa and chestnut tannins supplementation, respectively. While present study has shown that average Ostertagia fecal eggs production can be reduced by 57% on day 41 without use of anthelmintics when heifers received chestnut tannins as compared to a non-tannins containing diet. This reduction is an indication that plant tannins supplementation has an anthelmintic potential to control internal parasites in ruminants depending on sources of tannins and nematode species. Yamasaki et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref15">15</xref>] reported that substantial toxic effects have been detected in the digestive and reproductive tracts of Caenorhabditis elegans worms after contact with hydrolysable ellagic tannins. Similar lesions and shrinkages of the cuticle surface of adult T. colubriformis after incubation in a chestnut extract (1.2 mg/ml) in phosphate buffer solution have been shown in in vitro [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref10">10</xref>] , indicating that plant tannins, especially hydrolysable tannins, could directly affect the cuticle surface of worms or change their physical and biological process. Plant tannins could act indirectly, by improving the response of the host to parasites. Few studies, however, have addressed this indirect hypothesis by measuring specifically local or general parameters related to host immunity, and the results remain fundamentally inconclusive.</p><p>There is strong evidence showing that an improved efficiency of protein digestion throughout tannins-con- taining forage diet, especially by-pass protein from the rumen, can result in an increased ADG and animal productivity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref17">17</xref>] . The importance of plant tannins and protein digestion was confirmed by Min et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref18">18</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref19">19</xref>] , who found that 1.5% condensed tannins (quebracho) supplementation in steers grazing wheat forage increased ADG by 15%. Recently, Min et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref18">18</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref20">20</xref>] found that cattle grazing high quality wheat forage and feeding plant tannins were associated with ADG, altered rumen metabolites and microbial populations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref21">21</xref>] . Condensed tannins-containing forage diets in sheep have been previously shown to decrease proteolysis of high quality forage, but increased by-pass protein [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref16">16</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref17">17</xref>] . It therefore seems possible that the increased supply of protein and reduced internal parasite infestation caused by the action of tannins could be used to increase animal production system in grazing cattle with minimum anthelmintic drug usage in grazing ruminants. Studies are required to know the optimum levels of tannins in order to have this positive response. The concentration of tannins should not be high enough so that the true digestibility of the substrate is appreciably decreased.</p><p>Ingestion of phenolic compounds such as tannins have been shown to various gastrointestinal disturbances. Hervas et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref22">22</xref>] reported that condensed tannins (quebracho) extract diet was not toxic in terms of digestive tract (abomasums, small intestine, mucous and caecum) and plasma chemistry examinations in sheep supplemented less than 1.5 g/kg LW or less than 83 g/kg DM a day. However, sheep received condensed tannins up to 3 g/kg LW or 188 g/kg/DM a day, animals showed striking lesions in the digestive track, and changes in plasma biochemistry. Consumption of a small amount of mimosa tannins daily (3.5 g/kg DM) in diary cows (461 kg LW) does not cause toxic effects or does not negative affect cows performance, but depressed plasma urea concentrations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref23">23</xref>] . It has been shown that consumption of a small amount of hydrolysable chestnut tannins daily (20.8 g/kg DM) in lambs (15 - 25 kg LW) does not cause toxic effects or does not negatively affect lamb performance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref24">24</xref>] . Most of hydrolysable tannins toxicosis is natural poisonings documented in cattle consuming oak tree leaves [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref25">25</xref>] and the actual levels of hydrolysable tannins consumed are seldom reported. Krisper et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref26">26</xref>] reported that large quantities of chestnut tannins were toxic to the liver and kidney, but no detrimental effects (liver, kidney, stomach, and small intestine tissue) observed when chestnut tannins fed to piglets and rats during 28 days. In the present study, 1.5% mimosa and chestnut tannins supplementations per kg dry matter intake in heifers does not negatively affected in cattle blood chemistry, except plasma cholesterol level. Cattle fed 1.5% chestnut tannins diet over the 70 days increased plasma cholesterol level, but mimosa tannins did not, indicating that hydrolysable tannins may be affected lipid metabolism by unknown mechanisms. It is conceivable, as previously suggested [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58163-ref27">27</xref>] , that volatile fatty acids and particularly propionate plays a hypocholestrolemic role. However, it remains that a direct effect of the physiological concentrations of VFA and plant tannins on hepatic cholesterogenesis is still uncertain in ruminants. These studies also indicate that feeding low level (&lt;1.5% tannins/DMI) of plant tannins to ruminants may has no detrimental effects.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>It was concluded that heifers grazing winter wheat forage received plant tannins increased ADG with generally no detrimental effects. The increase in ADG may be due to decrease fecal parasites infections.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>B. R.Min,K.Hernandez,W. E.Pinchak,R. C.Anderson,J. E.Miller,E.Valencia, (2015) Effects of Plant Tannin Extracts Supplementation on Animal Performance and Gastrointestinal Parasites Infestation in Steers Grazing Winter Wheat. Open Journal of Animal Sciences,05,343-350. doi: 10.4236/ojas.2015.53038</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.58163-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kaplan, R.M. (2004) Drug Resistance in Nematodes of Veterinary Importance: A Status Report. Trends in Veterinary, 20, 477-481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2004.08.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58163-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Craig</surname><given-names> T.M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1988</year>)<article-title>Impact of Internal Parasites on Beef Cattle</article-title><source> Journal of Animal Science</source><volume> 55</volume>,<fpage> 1565</fpage>-<lpage>1569</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58163-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Parkins, J.J. and Holmes, P. (1989) Effects of Gastrointestinal Helminth Parasites on Ruminant Nutrition. Nutrition Research Reviews, 2, 227-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/NRR19890016</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58163-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Stuedemann, J.A., Kaplan, R.M., Miller, J.E. and Seman, D.H. (2005) Importance of Nematode Parasites in Cattle Grazing Research. Proceedings of the 59th Southern Pasture and Forage Crop Improvement Conference, Philidelphia.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58163-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Prichard, R. (1994) Antihelminthic Resistance. Veterinary Parasitology, 54, 259-268.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4017(94)90094-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58163-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Min, B.R. and Hart, S.P. (2003) Tannins for Suppression of Internal Parasites. Journal of Animal Science, 81, E102-E109.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58163-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Min, B.R., Hart, S.P., Miller, D., Tomita, G.M., Loetz, E. and Sahlu, T. (2005) The Effect of Grazing Forage Containing Condensed Tannins on Gastro-Intestinal Parasite Infection and Milk Composition in Angora Does. Veterinary Parasitology, 130, 105-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.03.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58163-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Molan, A.L., Waghorn, G.C. and McNabb, W.C. (1999) Condensed Tannins and Parasites. Proc. N.Z. Grassland Sco., 61, 57-61.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58163-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Molan, A.L., Waghorn, G.C., Min, B.R. and McNabb, W.C. (2000) The Effect of Condensed Tannins from the Seven Herbages on Trichostrongylus colubrifomis Larval Migration in Vitro. Folia Parasitologica, 47, 39-44.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.14411/fp.2000.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58163-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hoste, H., Jackson, F., Athanasiadou, S., Thamsborg, S.M. and Hoskin, S.O. (2006) The Effects of Tannin-Rich Plants on Parasitic Nematodes in Ruminants. Trends in Parasitology, 22, 253-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2006.04.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58163-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Butter, N.L., Dawson, J.M., Wakelin, D. and Buttery, P.J. (2001) Effect of Dietary Condensed Tannins on Gastrointestinal Nematodes. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 137, 461-469. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021859601001605</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58163-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Merck Veterinary Manual (MVM) (2006) Gastrointestinal Parasites of Ruminants. Merck &amp; Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station. http://www.merckvetmanual.com/mvm/index.jsp</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58163-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Zajac, A.M. (1994) Fecal Examination in the Diagnosis of Parasitism. In: Sloss, M.W., Kemp, R.L. and Zajac, A.M., Eds., Veterinary Clinical Parasitology, American Association of Veterinary Parasitologists, Iowa State University Press, Iowa City, 3-63.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58163-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Min, B.R., McNabb, W.C., Barry, T.N., Kemp, P.D., Waghorn, G.C. and McDonald, M.F. (1999) The Effect of Condensed Tannins in Lotus Corniculatus upon Reproductive Efficiency and Wool Production in Sheep during Late Summer and Autumn. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 132, 323-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021859699006371</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58163-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yamasaki, T., Sato, M., Mori, T., Mohamed, A.S., Fujii, K. and Tsukioka, J. (2002) Toxicity of Tannins towards the Free-Living Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and the Brine Shrimp Artemia salina. Journal of Natural Toxins, 11, 165-171.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58163-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Barry, T.N. and McNabb, W.C. (1999) Review Article: The Implications of Condensed Tannins on the Nutritive Value of Temperate Forages Fed to Ruminants. British Journal of Nutrition, 81, 263-272.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58163-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Min, B.R., Barry, T.N., Attwood, G.T. and McNabb, W.C. (2003) The Effect of Condensed Tannins on the Nutrition and Health of Ruminants Fed Fresh Temperate Forages: A Review. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 105, 3-19.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(03)00041-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58163-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Min, B.R., Pinchak, W.E., Fulford, J.D. and Puchala, R. (2005) Effect of Feed Additives on in Vitro and in Vivo Rumen Characteristics and Frothy Bloat Dynamics in Steers Grazing Wheat Pasture. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 123-124, 615-629. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.04.050</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58163-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Min, B.R., Attwood, G.T., McNabb, W.C., Molan, A.L. and Barry, T.N. (2005) The Effect of Condensed Tannins from Lotus corniculatus on the Proteolytic Activities and Growth of Rumen Bacteria. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 121, 45-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.02.007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58163-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Min, B.R., Pinchak, W.E., Anderson, R.C., Fulford, J.D. and Puchala, R. (2006) Effect of Condensed Tannins Supplementation Level on Weight Gain and in Vitro and in Vivo Bloat Precursors in Steers Grazing Wheat. Journal of Animal Science, 84, 2546-2554. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2005-590</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58163-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Min, B.R., Pinchak, W.E., Anderson, R.C. and Hume, M.E. (2006) In Vitro Bacterial Growth and in Vivo Ruminal Microbial Populations Associated with Bloat in Steers Grazing Wheat Forage. Journal of Animal Science, 84, 2873-2882.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2005-399</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58163-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hervas, G., Perez, V., Girldez, F.J., Mantecon, A.R., Almar, M.M. and Frutos, P. (2003) Intoxication of Sheep with Quebracho Tannin Extract. Journal of Comparative Pathology, 129, 44-54.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9975(02)00168-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58163-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mashudi, I., Brooks, I.M., Holmes, C.W. and Wilson, G.F. (1997) Effects of Mimosa Bark Extract Containing Condensed Tannins on Rumen Metabolism in Sheep and Milk Production by Grazing Cows. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production, 57, 126-129.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58163-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Frutos, P., Raso, M., Hervas, G., Mantecon, A.R. and Giraldez, V.P. (2004) Is There Any Detrimental Effect When a Chestnut Hydrolysable Tannin Extract is Included in the Diet of Finishing Lambs? Animal Research, 53, 127-136.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/animres:2004001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58163-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Spier, S.J., Smith, B.P., Seawright, A.A., Norman, B.B. and Oliver, S.R. (1987) Oak Toxicosis in Cattle in Northern Califonia: Clinical and Pathological Findings. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 191, 958-964.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58163-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Krisper, P., Tisler, V., Skubic, V., Rupnik, I. and Kobal, S. (1992) The Use of Tannin from Chestnut (Castana vesca). In: Hemingway, R.W. and Laks, P.E., Eds., Plant Polyphenols, Plunum Press, New York, 1013-1019.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58163-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, W.L. and Anderson, J.W. (1984) Propionate May Mediate the Hypocholesterolemic Effects of Certain Soluble Plant Fibers in Cholesterol-Fed Rats. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, 175, 215-218.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.3181/00379727-175-41791</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>