<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">GEP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4336</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/gep.2015.35008</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">GEP-58082</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Assessments of Elastic Anisotropy of Banded Amphibolite as a Function of Cleavage Orientation Using S- and P-Wave Velocity
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ali</surname><given-names>Esamaldeen</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Guang</surname><given-names>Wu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mohamed</surname><given-names>Nuha</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Faculty of Petroleum and Minerals, Al Neelain University, Khartoum, Sudan</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>esameldeen77@yahoo.com(AE)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>17</day><month>07</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>62</fpage><lpage>71</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>10</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>10</month>	<year>July</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>17</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
    
   As most rocks are of an anisotropic nature, the measurement elastic modulus of anistropic rocks is of general interest. Nevertheless, uniaxial compression test is common method to measure the dynamic elastic constants of anisotropic rocks; the use of ultrasonic pulse test is attractive, because the test is non-destructive and easy to apply. This study aimed to demonstrate the influence of orientation of foliation planes of banded amphibolite rocks on the compressional (Vp), shear wave (Vs) velocities propagating and elastic modules using ultrasonic pulse test. The result showed that the planes of foliation have a major effect on the wave velocity, where the Vp and Vs were taken parallel to the foliation plane show higher values than those obtained in the other directions (β = 30<sup>。</sup>, 60<sup>。</sup> and 90<sup>。</sup>). The preliminary conclusions are developed concerning that the elastic modulus is vary continuously as a function of cleavage orientation with respect to the direction of wave propagations, where Poisson’s ratio having the smallest relative change. The highest values of Young’s modulus and shear modulus are observed for foliation dip angles of 0? and the lowest values are for foliation dip angles of 90<sup>。</sup>. This indicates that the observed intrinsic anisotropy and the close relations of the directional dependent seismic anisotropy to the foliation planes are mainly a result of crystallographic preferred orientation of major minerals (e.g. horn- blende and elongated quarts grains).   
   
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Anisotropic</kwd><kwd> Elastic Modulus</kwd><kwd> Foliation</kwd><kwd> P- and S-Waves</kwd><kwd> Ultrasonic Pulse</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>By adopting both theoretical and experimental approaches, several authors reported that the anisotropy of metamorphic rocks plays crucial role in the planning and design of civil and mining engineering structures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58082-ref1">1</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58082-ref7">7</xref>]. The preferred orientation of external dimension and/or internal lattice of minerals due to differential mineral growth and/or rotation of preexisting mineral grains in a non-uniform stress field can define anisotropy of metamorphic rocks. In such rocks, preferred orientation of minerals and cracks are highly anisotropic to seismic waves. However, for an understanding and interpretation of rock anisotropy in the rock engineering, laboratory studies in elastic anisotropy considered of great importance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58082-ref8">8</xref>].</p><p>The dynamic elastic constants normally evaluated in the laboratory using a conventional uniaxial compressive test often with strain gauges stuck on cylindrical samples [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58082-ref9">9</xref>]. The compressive strength is the capacity of a material to withstand axially directed compressive forces. In such test, especially in anisotropic rocks, it is necessary to test specimens drilled in varying directions relative to the weakness plane of the rock that it is tedious and expensive procedure. Alternatively, the ultrasonic test system is used to determine P-and S-wave velocities and consequently the strain elastic constants. It is an attractive procedure since it is non-destructive, non-intru- sive, and easy to perform and is increasingly being used in geotechnical and mining engineering [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58082-ref10">10</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58082-ref12">12</xref>]. Various researchers have found that the sound velocity of rocks relates closely to the intact rock properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58082-ref13">13</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58082-ref17">17</xref>]. Additionally the most influencing parameters are grain size and shape, density, porosity, anisotropy, pore water, temperature, weathering and alteration zones.</p><p>In order to extend earlier investigations into the intrinsic nature of rock anisotropy, this study emphasizes on the elastic anisotropy of banded amphibolite that indicated by their P- and S-wave velocities as a function of velocity anisotropy. This emphasis is placed on the relationship between the directional dependence of compressional (V<sub>p</sub>) and shear wave velocities (V<sub>s</sub>) and the foliation plane of the rocks. In addition, a foremost focus of the study is to elucidate the pronounced relationship between the crystallographic fabric (foliation plane) and the dynamic elastic constants (Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio) in a simplified model. Young’s modulus is modulus of elasticity measuring of the stiffness of a rock material, similar to strength, and it varies widely with rock type. For extremely hard and strong rocks, it can be as high as 100 GPa. Poisson’s ratio measures the ratio of lateral strain to axial strain, at linearly-elastic region. For most rocks, the Poisson’s ratio is between 0.15 and 0.4. At later stage of loading beyond linearly elastic region, lateral strain increases faster than the axial strain and hence leads to a higher ratio.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Experimental Methodologies</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Rock Samples Preparation</title><p>Initially, twenty-four rock samples were prepared using large size blocks of banded amphibolite, which were collected from varied rock slopes along Chengdu-wenchuan highway in Sichuan province in china for laboratory investigation. These rocks were selected due to their high rock-fabric complexity and their high significance impact in rock engineering design. Macroscopically, the rocks exhibit a distinct planar syn-metamorphic fabric that characterized with near perfect tectonic metamorphic layering and mineral alignment/elongation (schistosity) and penetrative stretching lineation. The foliation bands varying in thickness from 1 to 3 mm and stretched to a length of 5 mm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(a)).</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> (a) Angle of weakness plane measured from major loading direction. (b) Amphibolite specimens prepared at different orientation angles</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/58082x4.png"/></fig><p>For the laboratory test, the collected rock blocks were trimmed with their side’s perpendicular to each other to facilitated coring in at different angles. A total of eighty five cylindrical specimens of length to diameter ration equal to 2 were cored at different orientation of anisotropy planes β (0˚, 30˚, 60˚ and 90˚) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>(b)). Rock specimens were cored using conventional laboratory drilling machine and the ends trimmed as required as per the [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58082-ref18">18</xref>] standards. After coring, the rock specimens were further smoothened using a lathe to avoid end effects. The specimens were dried at 105˚C for 24 h to remove the moisture. The density is determined for core specimens following the standard test procedures outlined in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58082-ref18">18</xref>] (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Microscopic Description</title><p>Obtaining a reliable relationship is contingent on an effective petrographic study of the rockcore samples. Thus, to evaluate the petrography and petro-fabric of the studied rocks, thin sections across and along the schistosity were prepared and observed under a high power polarized microscope. The mineral assemblage and texture</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Density, P- and S-wave velocity, and elastic modulus for amphibolite rocks</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample No.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Core Orientation (o)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Density (G/cm<sup>3</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>p</sub> (m/s)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>s</sub> (m/s)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >V<sub>p</sub>/V<sub>s</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Young’s modulus (E)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Poisson’s ratio (v)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Shear modulus (G)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1A-2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >2.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4384</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2340</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40,314</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.301</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15,496</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1A-6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4843</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2628</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50,478</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.291</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19,545</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8A-2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >2.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4591</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2945</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57,071</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.150</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24,805</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8A-6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5441</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3108</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68,528</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.258</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27,240</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8B-3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >2.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4537</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3007</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57,523</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.108</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25,951</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8B-5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4629</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3014</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60,056</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.132</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26,526</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9B-3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >2.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4669</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3096</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57,968</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.108</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26,168</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9B-6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4745</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2606</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48,136</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.284</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18,744</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1C-3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >2.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4628</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2766</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52,923</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.222</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21,652</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1C-4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4996</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2938</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59,944</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.236</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24,255</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4-3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >2.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4691</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2993</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58,027</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.157</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25,083</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4-4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4840</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3080</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61,389</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.160</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26,467</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >2.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4231</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2454</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42,488</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.247</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17,043</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12-6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4441</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2804</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49,980</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.169</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21,386</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12-9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4396</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2844</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51,824</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.140</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22,728</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12-12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4218</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2866</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49,449</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.071</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23,081</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >13-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >2.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4270</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2727</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46,921</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.156</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20,302</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >13-5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4984</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61,469</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.185</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25,947</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >13-8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4442</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2820</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50,473</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.162</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21,710</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >13-11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4952</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2780</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43,097</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.010</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21,330</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >2.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4904</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2924</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61,753</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.224</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25,222</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14-4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5331</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3178</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72,462</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.224</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29,592</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14-8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5186</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3066</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67,829</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.231</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27,543</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14-11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4800</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2900</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59,759</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.213</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24,641</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15-1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="4"  >2.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4477</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2727</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50,364</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.205</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20,897</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15-6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4703</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2828</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >55,275</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.217</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22,713</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15-9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4776</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2799</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54,333</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.238</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21,936</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15-11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4605</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2827</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53,981</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.198</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22,537</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>characteristics of the typical rocks may vary within the meter scale. However, slight compositional heterogeneity may found down to the centimeter scale. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows the microscopic textural variations of visually selected rock subtype samples of amphibolite rocks, which is considered as amphibolite schist based on its mineral assemblage of low-grade metamorphism. Although it can be classified as amphibolite gneiss texturally based on the alternative felsic and mafic minerals, which is preserved in the gneissosity texture.</p><p>The predominant mineralogical composition is almost hornblende, actinolite, quartz and feldspar with minor amounts of epidote, biotite, chlorite and calcite. Microscopic descriptions of thin sections show that the rock samples contain varying proportions of nematoblastic hornblende set in a fine-to medium-grained quartz-pla- gioclase mosaic. Furthermore, the main microstructure is characterized by well-developed layered lattice structure that defined by strong crystallographic preferred orientation of hornblende (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b)) and elongated quartz grains in quartz rich zone (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(c) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(d)). Aligned xenoblastic hornblende crystals form the bulk of the rock that average is 0.15 mm, although large crystals reach 0.3 mm, and they usually contain numerous small inclusions of quartz (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(c)).</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Optical micrographs of thin sections showing the microstructural characteristics of the investigated rocks, crossed polars. Thin sections were cut perpendicular to the foliation plane. (a) nematoblastic hornblende set in medium-grained quartz-plagioclase mosaic, (b) well-developed foliated fine-graind amphibolite shows porphyroblasts of quarts and plagioclase and rod-shaped hornblende defines the lineation within the foliation plane, (c) and (d) quartz rich medium-grained amphibolite, (e) and (f) fine-grained epidote amphibolite schist</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/58082x5.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Ultrasonic S-/P-wave tester consists of a pulse generator unit; transmitter and receiver transducers to measure the sonic pulse velocity. The transmitter and the receiver are positioned at the ends of each core specimen and the travel time of the pulse wave is measured</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/58082x6.png"/></fig><p>Apparently, the orientation of the mineral inclusions is generally controlled by the cleavage of the host hornblende. In some thin sections, numerous porphyroblasts of quarts and plagioclase considerably deflect the schistosity plane (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b)). Prismatic (Hornblende and actinolite) minerals are occurring in alternate order with respect to quartz felspathic bands (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a)). The overall symmetry of the hornblende fabric is orthorhombic with the foliation as the symmetry plane. The alignment of the rod-shaped hornblende minerals defines the lineation within the foliation plane (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(d)). Some parts of fine-grained amphibolite composed almost entired of small granular epidote crystals and the hornblende has altered to stellate aggregates of fibrous actinolite and chlorite (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(f)). Granular epidote crystals are concentrated in parallel bands upto 1 mm. thick or occurred in sub circular or elliptical shape (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(e) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(f)). The presence of chlorite and epidote along with the aforementioned mineral assemblage suggests that the rock belongs to low grade regional metamorphic facies. The accessory minerals include calcite, apatite, sphene and iron oxide.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Ultrasonic Pulse Test</title><p>Ultrasonic test is used as a method to determine the velocity of propagation of P and S waves in laboratory cylindrical core samples and then to determine the elastic symmetry of anisotropic rocks. In this technique, the frequency of wave should be high and rock specimens should have infinite extent compared to the wavelength of the pulses. Twenty-four cylindrical rock samples were prepared by cutting and lapping the ends and the length is measured for each. An ultrasonic digital indicator consist a pulse generator unit, transmitter and receiver transducers are used for sonic pulse velocity measurement. The transmitter and the receiver are positioned at the ends of each specimen and the travel time of the pulse wave is measured. The velocity is calculated by dividing the length of rock sample by wave travel time.</p><p>Both velocities of the compressional P-wave and shear S-wave were measured for each core samples with reference to the foliation angle and the average of 3 to 5 sample results was determined (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> shows the used instrument for the P- and S-velocity measurements based on ASTM [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58082-ref19">19</xref>] standard. The velocity of ultrasonic pulses travelling in a solid material depends on the density and elastic properties of that material.</p><p>From the theory of elasticity, compressional (or longitudinal) P-wave velocity (V<sub>p</sub>) is related to the elastic modulus (E), and the density (ρ) of the material as in Equation (1). If ρ in g/cm<sup>3</sup> and V<sub>p</sub> in km/s, then E in GPa (10<sup>9</sup> N/m<sup>2</sup>). The elastic modulus estimated by this method is the sometime termed as seismic modulus (also called dynamic modulus, but should not be mistaken as the modulus under dynamic compression). It is different from the modules obtained by the uniaxial compression tests. The value of the seismic modulus is generally slightly higher than the modulus determined from static compression tests [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58082-ref20">20</xref>]. Similarly, seismic shear modulus G may be determined from shear S-wave velocity Vs (Equation (2)). Gsis in GPa, when density ρ is in g/cm<sup>3</sup>, and S-wave velocity Vs is in km/s. Seismic Poisson’s ration ν can be determined from Equation (3). Alternatively, seismic Young’s modulus Es can be determined from shear modulus (G<sub>s</sub>) and Poisson’s ratio (νs) as in Equation (4).</p><disp-formula id="scirp.58082-formula687"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/58082x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.58082-formula688"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/58082x8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.58082-formula689"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/58082x9.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.58082-formula690"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/58082x10.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Experimental Result and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Wave Velocity Anisotropy</title><p>In order to examine the influence of velocity anisotropy of banded amphibolite the results obtained from the measurement of wave velocities in different directions to the foliation planes are summarized in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. The P-wave velocities range from 3952.6 to 5441 m/s with mean 4676.9 m/s and for S-wave velocity varied between 2340.8 and 3178.9 m/s with mean value 2842.3 m/s. The average correlation of P- and S-wave follows the expression V<sub>p</sub> = 1.6 Vs. The wave velocities with orientation of foliation planes (0˚, 30˚, 60˚, and 90˚) relationship are characteristic for the investigated rock specimens (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). Because elastic wave propagation is very sensitive to weak discontinouty, velocities propagate parallel to the oriented fractures are much higher than those in perpendicular propagation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58082-ref21">21</xref>]. It is obvious that the planes of foliation have a major effect on the wave velocity, where the V<sub>p</sub> and V<sub>s</sub> taken parallel to the foliation plane show highest values than those obtained in the other directions (β = 30˚, 60˚ and 90˚). However, it was detected in some core samples varied values of V<sub>p</sub> and V<sub>s</sub> with in the same orientation plane due to the numerous porphyroblasts of quarts and plagioclase that considerably deflect the schistosity plane as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. At the scale of microscope, it may be observed that these rocks are characterised by a marked orientation of grains planes systematically oriented parallel to foliation.</p><p>The anisotropy degree (defined as the ratio of the maximum to the minimum wave velocity) is equal to 1.38 and 1.36 for the longitudinal (P) and transverse (S) wave velocity respectively. The behavior of the sebanded amphibolitesis similar with observations made by Saroglou et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58082-ref22">22</xref>] who tested different gneissic rocks (from Egnatia highway, in northern Greece) parallel and perpendicular to foliation. They determined a mean compression and shear velocity of V<sub>p</sub> = 4182 m/s and V<sub>s</sub> = 2668 m/s respectively, parallel to foliation, while perpendicular to it the velocity was V<sub>p</sub> = 2608 m/s and V<sub>s</sub> = 1578 m/s. This was in accordance with the findings of the current research (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Modulus Anisotropy from Wave Velocity Measurements</title><p>Although values of elastic constants properties, by ultrasonic evaluation, tend to be higher than those preliminary predicted by static laboratory methods, however these values are nonetheless a useful in preliminary prediction of static properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58082-ref23">23</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.58082-ref28">28</xref>].</p><p>However, in this study, a correlation analyses were carried out in order to study the influence of the orientation of foliation planes on the elastic constants that obtained from ultrasonic pulse test. Figures 5-7 shows the relationship results between the three measuring elastic constants and dip angle (β). There was significant correlation found between Young’s modulus (E) and shear modulus against dip angle with correlation coefficient R<sup>2</sup> = 0.61 - 0.82 and R<sup>2</sup> = 0.56 - 0.82, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>) except the Poisson’s ratio that shows poor correlation coefficient (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.01 - 0.3) to the orientation of the foliation planes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). The result indicates that the maximum values of the E and G are for a β of 0˚ and minimum values for β of 90˚ therefore no clear</p><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> P- and S-wave velocities with orientation of foliation planes (a) P-wave (b) S-wave</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/58082x11.png"/></fig><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Correlation between Young’s modulus and foliation dip angle of amphibolites samples</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/58082x12.png"/></fig><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Correlation between shear modulus and foliation dip angle of amphibolites samples</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/58082x13.png"/></fig><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> Correlation between Poisson’s ratio and foliation dip angle of amphibolites samples</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/58082x14.png"/></fig><p>dependence on the mineralogical and textural varieties of studied rocks was experienced. It is summarized that the observed intrinsic anisotropy and the close relations of the directional dependent seismic anisotropy to the foliation planes is mainly a result of crystallographic preferred orientation of major minerals (e.g. hornblende and elongated quarts grains).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Precise measurement of compression and shear velocities of anisotropic rocks by ultrasonic pulse test make the basis for the general assessment of static elastic constants in the initial design stage in geotechnical and mining engineering. Since this technique is non-destructive and easy to perform. The study describes results from ultrasonic pulse test performed on twenty-four different specimens of banded amphibolite to find a relationship that is used to compensate for the influence of orientation of foliation planes in the elastic modules. P- and S-wave velocities were measured as a function of orientation of foliation plane (β = 0˚, 30˚, 60˚ and 90˚) and accordingly dynamic elastic constants were calculated. The whole rock seismic properties display a P-wave and S-wave pattern with high velocities for waves propagating parallel to foliation and significantly lower velocities normal to it, corresponding to the hornblende and quartz preferred orientation. The study shows that high dip angle means lower elastic anisotropy, which is clearly observed by Young’s and shear modulus (~40 &#215; 10<sup>3</sup> and 15 &#215; 10<sup>3</sup> respectively). Consequently, the relative proportions of major minerals and their orientations control velocity disparity in anisotropy rocks. In conclusion, the main factor producing velocity anisotropy is the direction dependence of foliation plane of the rock material.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This research financially supported by the southwest jiaotong university, china, which is greatly acknowledged. The authors would like also to thank the center laboratory of southwest petroleum university for their assistance in conducting the rock tests.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Ali Esamaldeen,Guang Wu,Mohamed Nuha, (2015) Assessments of Elastic Anisotropy of Banded Amphibolite as a Function of Cleavage Orientation Using S- and P-Wave Velocity. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection,03,62-71. doi: 10.4236/gep.2015.35008</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.58082-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brown, E.T., Richard, L.R. and Barr, M.V. (1977) Shear Strength Characteristics of Delabole Slate. Proceedings Conference on Rock Engineering, New Castle upon Tyne, 31-51.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58082-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hoek, E. and Brown, E.T. (1980) Underground Excavation in Rocks, London. The Institution of Mining and Metallurgy.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58082-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Broch, E. (1983) Estimation of Strength Anisotropy Using the Point Load Test. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences &amp; Geomechanics Abstracts, 20, 181-187.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(83)90942-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58082-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rao, K.S., Rao, G.V. and Ramamurthy, T. (1986) A Strength Criterion for Anisotropic Rocks. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 16, 317-333.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58082-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Read, S.A.L., Perrin, N.D. and Brown, I.R. (1987) Measurement and Analysis of Laboratory Strength and Deformability Characteristics of Schistose Rocks. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Rock Mechanics, Montreal, 233-238.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58082-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Ramamurthy, T. (1993) Strength, Modulus Responses of Anisotropic Rocks: In: Hudson, J.A., Ed., Compressive Rock Engineering, Vol. 1, Pergamon, Oxford, 313-329.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58082-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nasseria, M.H.B., Rao, K.S. and Ramamurthy, T. (2003) Anisotropic Strength and Deformational Behavior of Himalayan Schists. International Journal of Rock Mechanics &amp; Mining Sciences, 40, 3-23.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00103-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58082-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kern, H., Popp, T., Gorbatsevich, F., Zharikov, A., Lobanov, K.V. and Smirnov Yu, P. (2001) Pressure and Temperature Dependence of Vp and Vs in Rocks from the Superdeep Well and from Surfaceanalogues at Kola and the Nature of Velocity Anisotropy. Tectonophysics, 338, 113-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1951(01)00128-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58082-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Amadei, B. (1996) Importance of Anisotropy When Estimation and Measuring in Situ Stresses in Rock. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences &amp; Geo-mechanics Abstracts, 33, 293-326. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(95)00062-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58082-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Young, R.P., Hill, T.T., Bryan, I.R. and Middleton, R. (1985) Seismic Spectroscopy in Fracture Characterization. Quartarnary Journal of Engineering Geology, 18, 459-479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1144/GSL.QJEG.1985.018.04.16</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58082-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kahraman, S. (2002) Estimating the Direct P-Wave Velocity Value of Intact Rock from Indirect Laboratory Measurements. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 39, 101-104. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00005-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58082-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sharma, P.K. and Singh, T.N. (2008) A Correlation between P-Wave Velocity, Impact Strength Index, Slake Durability Index and Uniaxial Compressive Strength. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 67, 17-22. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10064-007-0109-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58082-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lama, R.D. and Vutukuri, V.S. (1978) Handbook on Mechanical Properties of Rocks. 2nd Edition, Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58082-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Inoue, M. and Ohomi, M. (1981) Relation between Uniaxial Compressive Strength and Elastic Wave Velocity of Soft Rock. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Weak Rock, Tokyo.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58082-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gaviglio, P. (1989) longitudinal Waves Propagation in a Limestone: The Relationship between Velocity and Density. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 22, 299-306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01262285</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58082-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McCann, D.M. and Fenning, P.J. (1995) Estimation of Rippability and Excavation Conditions from Seismic Velocity Measurements. In: Engineering Geology of Construction, The Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Special Publication, 10, 335-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1144/gsl.eng.1995.010.01.29</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58082-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kahraman, S. (2001) A Correlation between P-Wave Velocity, Number of Joints and Schmidt Hammer Rebound Number. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 38, 729-733. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(01)00034-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58082-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">ASTM (2004) Standard Practices for Preparing Rock Core Specimens and Determining Dimensional and Shape Tolerances, D. 4543-04. Annual Book of A.S.T.M. Standards: American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshocken.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58082-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">ASTM (2005) Standard Test Method for Laboratory Determination of Pulse Velocities and Ultrasonics Elastic Constants of Rock: D. 2845-05, Annual Book of A.S.T.M. Standards: 4.08. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshocken.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58082-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Esamaldeen, A., Wu, G., Zhao, Z.M. and Jiang, W.X. (2014) Assessments of Strength Anisotropy and Deformation Behavior of Banded Amphibolite Rocks. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 32, 429-438. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10706-013-9724-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58082-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lo, T.W., Coyner, K.B. and Toksoz, M.N. (1986) Experimental Determination of Elastic Anisotropy of Berea Sandstone, Chicopee Shale, and Chelmsford Granite. Geophysics, 51, 164-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.1442029</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58082-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Saroglou, H., Marinos, P. and Tsiambaos, G. (2004) The Aniso-tropic Nature of Selected Metamorphic Rocks from Greece. The Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 217-222.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58082-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sharma, P.V. (1986) Geophysical Methods in Geology. 2nd Edition, Elsevier, Amsterdam.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58082-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Entwisle, D.C. and McCann, D.M. (1990) An Assessment of the Use of Christensen’s Equation for the Prediction of Shear Wave Velocity and Engineering Parameters. In: Geological Applications of Wireline Logs, Geological Society Special Publication No. 48: Geological Society of London, London, 347-354.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1144/gsl.sp.1990.048.01.29</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58082-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hassani, P.P., Sadri, A. and Momayez, M. (1997) A Miniature Seismic Reflection System for Evaluation of Concrete Linings. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 10, 677-691. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s000240050099</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58082-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dobrin, B.M. and Savit, C.H. (1988) Introduction to Geophysical Prospecting. 4th Edition, McGraw-Hill.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58082-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Turcotte, D.L. and Schubert, G. (2002) Geodynamics. 2nd Edition, Uni-versity Press, Cambridge. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807442</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.58082-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Blyth, F.G.H. and De Freitas, M.H. (2003) A Geology for Engi-neers. 7th Edition, Butterworth-Heinemann, Great Britain.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>