<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JWARP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Water Resource and Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1945-3094</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jwarp.2015.79058</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JWARP-57827</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  The Limnology of a Mississippi River Alluvial Plain Oxbow Lake Following the Application of Conservation Practices
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>cott</surname><given-names>Knight</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Robert</surname><given-names>Cullum</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Richard</surname><given-names>Lizotte</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>USDA-ARS National Sedimentation Laboratory, Oxford, USA</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>scott.knight@ars.usda.gov(CK)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>08</day><month>07</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>07</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>709</fpage><lpage>714</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>20</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>6</month>	<year>July</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>9</day>	<month>July</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  From 1995 and 2011, Beasley Lake watershed near Indianola, MS, was subjected to a variety of conservation measures designed to reduce water velocity, erosion and discharge of sediment laden water. Water quality monitoring during the period indicated a number of long term trends and relationships between the parameters measured. Conservation practices reduced sediments and nutrients during the course of the study that resulted in increased Secchi visibility and chlorophyll a. Annual mean dissolved oxygen decreased slightly over time and was strongly dependent upon temperature, and weakly associated with varying salinity and pH. Total phosphorus, ammonium nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen showed significant downward trends from 1995 through 2011. Chlorophyll a concentration was significantly dependent upon total nitrogen but not phosphate, indicating nitrogen limiting conditions. Watershed based conservation practices significantly changed the long term water quality of Beasley Lake by reducing sediment and nutrients, increasing water clarity and boosting primary production as indicated by chlorophyll a.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Chlorophyll</kwd><kwd> Nutrients</kwd><kwd> Non-Point Pollution</kwd><kwd> Water Quality</kwd><kwd> Watershed</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Despite significant financial investment in conservation practices and water quality protection, biodiversity continues to decline due to water quality and habitat degradation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57827-ref1">1</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57827-ref5">5</xref>] . A recent national assessment rated about 42% of the nation’s streams as having “poor” biological condition, with about one-third of total stream length designated as stressed by elevated nitrogen (N) or phosphorus (P) concentrations and about one-quarter impaired by riparian zone degradation or excess fine sediment in the streambed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57827-ref6">6</xref>] . Recent national lakes assessment estimated 33% of lakes have poor lakeshore habitat and 20% have elevated nutrient levels, with agriculture cited as a leading source of impairment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57827-ref7">7</xref>] . Fresh water bodies are experiencing declines in biodiversity as much as five times more rapidly than those in the most affected terrestrial ecosystems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57827-ref8">8</xref>] . Future influences on environmental quality include synergistic effects of climate change, biofuel production, increased human population and exotic species. In recent decades, major strides have been made in implementing soil conservation measures, but in many agricultural landscapes, water quality issues remain unsolved [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57827-ref9">9</xref>] . Off-site and downstream impacts of agricultural water pollution continue to raise concerns, most notably marine dead zones linked to excess N and P [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57827-ref10">10</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57827-ref11">11</xref>] . Rivers and natural lakes within cultivated floodplains also experience chronic hypoxia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57827-ref12">12</xref>] . New and improved technology is needed to address these issues in support of Federal mandates under the Clean Water Act of 1972, the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008, and the Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watersheds Initiative (MRBI).</p><p>One of the most intensively farmed agricultural areas of the United States is the southern portion of the Mississippi River Alluvial Plain, an 11 million hectares area locally referred to as the Mississippi Delta. This alluvial plain region is a narrow strip on both sides of the Mississippi River, widening in some places to approximately 160 kilometers, that extends over 1100 kilometers from southeastern Missouri to the Gulf of Mexico. Agricultural activities in the Delta differ significantly from those in other regions such as the mid-western United States [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57827-ref13">13</xref>] . The humid sub-tropical climate in the Delta allows a different array of crops and cultural practices than those common in other areas of the United States. These factors, in combination with high regional rainfall amounts, can increase the chances for soil erosion and chemical movement within Delta watersheds.</p><p>Agricultural activities are considered, by some, to be a major source of nonpoint source pollution in the United States. Examples of nonpoint source pollution have been documented in various agricultural regions like the Midwest [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57827-ref14">14</xref>] . Nonpoint source pollutants include sediment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57827-ref15">15</xref>] , pesticides and nutrients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57827-ref16">16</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57827-ref18">18</xref>] . Legislation such as the Clean Water Act recognizes agricultural Best Management Practices (BMPs) as methods to reduce nonpoint source pollution. BMPs are typically implemented on farms on a voluntary basis with funding provided through cost-share programs if available. However, since the late 1980’s, legislation such as reauthorizations of the Clean Water Act and the Farm Bill began to contain language that implied the mandatory use of BMPs in agricultural communities to reduce nonpoint source pollution.</p><p>Delta lakes, long known for their productivity and recreational value [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57827-ref19">19</xref>] , have not escaped the detrimental effects of soil erosion. Their popularity as recreational resources has decreased as water quality and fisheries have declined [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57827-ref20">20</xref>] . Cooper and Knight [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57827-ref21">21</xref>] have attributed these declines, in part, to soil erosion and sedimentation. Detrimental impacts on stream and lake water quality due to erosion and sedimentation have been well documented [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57827-ref22">22</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57827-ref23">23</xref>] .</p><p>Oxbow lakes are remnants of meandering floodplain rivers that have been cut off and physically isolated from their respective main river channels. Because of this isolated condition, changes begin to occur in the physical and chemical characteristics of the lake basin and in the floral and faunal assemblages. Over time allochthonous organic materials derived from previous connections with the floodplain river ecosystem are processed and energetically depleted. Isolated oxbow lakes in agricultural regions tend to become less heterotrophic and more autotrophic, becoming closed entities within themselves, functioning similarly to farm ponds and other small impoundments.</p><p>If suspended sediment concentrations are low enough to provide suitable light penetration, oxbow lakes provide conditions conducive to photosynthesis, primarily via phytoplankton, and may support a sustainable sport fishery. However, agricultural practices often result in soil erosion that can lead to increased turbidity in the oxbow lakes and subsequent inhibition of photosynthesis. Turbidity in oxbow lakes can be persistent in areas having soils with high clay content. Although nutrients such as phosphorus are commonly associated with delta soils and isolated oxbow lakes tend that to load nutrients, these systems may become energy starved and very unproductive due to lack of light penetration.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><p>Beasley Lake Watershed was a component of the Mississippi Delta Management Systems Evaluation Area (MD- MSEA) from 1994-2004 and was later included as one of 14 USDA Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) benchmark watersheds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57827-ref24">24</xref>] . As such, the watershed has produced a significant long-term database of best management practices (BMPs) from 1994-2011. This study was conducted on Beasley Lake located south of Indianola, MS, in Sunflower County in the lower Mississippi River drainage basin. Beasley Lake is a 16 ha oxbow with a large wooded riparian zone located in a 915 ha watershed. During the initial years of the study (1994- 1996), Beasley Lake watershed (BLW) was farmed using conventional tillage to grow cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and soybeans (Glycine max [L.] Merr). Over the course of the study the watershed received a variety of conservation management practices designed to reduce water velocity, erosion, and discharge of sediment-laden water into the lake; thus, reducing nonpoint source pollutants entering the lake [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57827-ref25">25</xref>] . From 1994-2011, crops produced in BLW included cotton, corn (Zea mays L.), and soybean, approximately half irrigated with center pivot systems with the remainder dryland. Seven independent BMPs have been implemented at BLW. From 1994-1996, three structural edge-of-field BMPs were implemented: vegetative filter strips comprised of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) or fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.); pipes with slotted board risers for water impoundment during the fallow season; or pipes with slotted inlets to impede water flow positioned at outlets of sub-drainage areas. Beginning in 2001, much of the cropland was converted to reduced tillage with winter cover crops. From 2003-2004, 12.4% (114 ha) of the arable land was removed from row-crop production and planted in trees under Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) implementation. In 2006, 4 - 5 ha of arable land along the southern lake shoreline was removed from row-crop production and converted to vegetative buffer habitat to attract northern bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57827-ref26">26</xref>] . A constructed wetland and a two-cell sediment basin, respectively, were established in 2003 and 2010, respectively.</p><p>Water quality was measured from February 1995 through August 2011. Water sampling sites were located at three locations; one in the middle of the lake and one at each distal end. Surface water was collected at each site at the depth of approximately 0.25 m. Automated water quality monitoring equipment was used to obtain biweekly measurements of temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen and conductivity. Surface water was sampled biweekly for total, suspended, and dissolved solids, total phosphorus, filterable ortho-phosphate, total nitrogen, ammonium nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen, chlorophyll, coliform and enterococci bacterial counts and Secchi visibility. Additional and more specific details of sampling regimes, physical and chemical parameters measured, and analysis procedures for the project varied with the different aspects of the project and are in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57827-ref27">27</xref>] .</p><p>Analytical and chemical methods were based on procedures from [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57827-ref28">28</xref>] . Calculation of means and statistical analysis (linear regressions or correlations) were completed using SigmaStat for Windows version 2.03 statistical software. All parameters were tested for differences at the 5% level of significance.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Trends through Time</title><p>An examination of the data showed several trends over time. Dissolved oxygen concentrations decreased slightly over time while pH and salinity exhibited slight increases (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) While the trends were statistically significant the standard coefficients were very low; −0.141 for dissolved oxygen, 0.247 for pH and 0.280 for salinity. However, there were relatively strong positive correlations between conductivity (correlation coefficient = r = 0.681), salinity (r = 0.356) and dissolved solids (r = 0.694) with time. This is reasonable since dissolved solids are primarily salts which will affect salinity concentrations which in turn has a positive effect on conductivity.</p><p>Suspended and total solids decreased significantly over the course of the study. Total solids decreased 65% from an annual mean high of 592 mg/L in 1996 to an annual mean low of 82 in 2008. Suspended solids, the major component of total solids also showed significant downward trends with time (r = −0.455). Both Secchi depth and chlorophyll a concentrations increased as suspended solids decreased (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>). The significant inverse relationship (r = −0.544) between Secchi visibility and total solids is expected since suspended sediment will reduce visibility (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). The decrease over time was likely due to the application of conservation practices designed to reduce sediment in agricultural runoff. Total phosphorus (r = −0.429), ammonium nitrogen (r = −0.421) and nitrate nitrogen (r = −0.295) showed significant downward trends during the course of the study. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref> shows decreasing monthly mean total phosphate and nitrate over time with an increasing concentration of monthly mean chlorophyll a (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). Trends are more easily seen by plotting monthly mean total phosphate, nitrate and chlorophyll a by year (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>). Annual mean chlorophyll a significantly increased from 1995 through 2011 (r = 0.726).</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Monthly pH, dissolved oxygen concentration and salinity from 1999 through 2011 from Beasley Lake</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-9402151x6.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Annual means for total solids, Secchi and chlorophyll a in Beasley Lake from 1995 through 2011</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-9402151x7.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Monthly mean Secchi depth and total solids concentrations for Beasley Lake from January 1995 through June 2011</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-9402151x8.png"/></fig><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Monthly mean chlorophyll a, phosphate and nitrate concentrations for Beasley Lake from 1995 through 2011</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-9402151x9.png"/></fig><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Annual mean chlorophyll a, nitrate and phosphate concentrations for Beasley Lake from 1995 through 2011</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-9402151x10.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Relationships between Parameters</title><p>The temperature, conductivity and salinity data indicated positive significance among one another. As temperatures increased during any given year evaporation likely increased the salt concentrations in the lake. The correlation coefficient for temperature and conductivity was 0.802 and for temperature and salinity was 0.694. As one might expect dissolved oxygen was dependent upon temperature (r = −0.572) and varied seasonally. Salinity was significantly but weakly related to dissolved oxygen concentrations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>), as dissolved oxygen increased salinity tended to decrease. This finding is consistent with the relationship between salinity and dissolved oxygen as reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57827-ref29">29</xref>] . Conversely, as dissolved oxygen increased, pH also increased. It is likely that as phytoplankton removed carbon dioxide from the water column and produced oxygen, carbonates accumulated, hydrolyzed, and raised pH [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57827-ref29">29</xref>] . Analysis of chlorophyll a and phosphorus showed no significant relationships among chlorophyll a, total phosphate, and ortho-phosphate, however there was a significant positive relationship between total Kjeldhal nitrogen and total nitrogen (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref>). While phosphorus is most commonly the limiting nutrient of fresh water, nitrogen can be limiting and this may be the case in Beasley Lake.</p><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Monthly mean pH and salinity plotted against dissolved oxygen concentration for Beasley Lake</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-9402151x11.png"/></fig><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> Mean monthly total nitrogen versus mean monthly chlorophyll a for Beasley Lake from 1995 through 2011</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-9402151x12.png"/></fig></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Conservation practices effectively reduced sediment and nutrient entering Beasley Lake via agricultural runoff during the course of the study. In response, Secchi visibility and chlorophyll a increased over time. Annual mean dissolved oxygen decreased slightly over time and was strongly dependent upon temperature, and weakly associated with varying salinity and pH. Total phosphorus, ammonium nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen showed significant downward trends from 1995 through 2011. Chlorophyll a increased during the study period and was significantly dependent upon total nitrogen and total Kjeldhal nitrogen but not phosphate indicating nitrogen limiting conditions. This research demonstrates the effectiveness of watershed based conservation practices in reducing sediment and nutrients, increasing water clarity and boosting primary production as indicated by chlorophyll a. Further it provides insight into the dynamics of limnological parameters of shallow oxbow lakes.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.57827-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ricciardi, A. and Rasmussen, J.B. (1999) Extinction Rates of North American Freshwater Fauna. Conservation Biology, 13, 1220-1222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98380.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57827-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Warren Jr., M.L., Burr, B.M., Walsh, S.J., Bart Jr., H.L., Cashner, R.C., Etnier, D.A., Freeman, B.J., Kuhajda, B.R., Mayden, R.L., Robison, H.W., Ross, S.T. and Starnes, W.C. (2000) Diversity, Distribution, and Conservation Status of the Native Freshwater Fishes of the Southern United States. Fisheries, 24, 7-31.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446(2000)025&lt;0007:DDACSO&gt;2.0.CO;2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57827-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Karr, J.R., Allan, J.D. and Benke, A.C. (2000) River conservation in the United States and Canada. In: Boon, P.J., Davies, B.R. and Petts, G.E., Eds., Global Perspectives on River Conservation, Science, Policy, and Practice, John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd., Chichester, 3-39.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57827-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aarts, B.G.W., Van Den Brink, W.B. and Nienhuis, P.H. (2004) Habitat Loss as the Main Cause of the Slow Recovery of Fish Faunas of Regulated Large Rivers in Europe: The Transversal Floodplain Gradient. River Research and Applications, 20, 3-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rra.720</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57827-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shields Jr., F.D., Knight, S.S., Lizotte, R.E. and Wren, D.G. (2010) Floodplain River Backwater Restoration: A Case Study. Proceedings of the 9th Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference, Joint Federal Interagency Conference Organizing Committee, Washington DC, CD-ROM.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57827-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Paulsen, S.G., Mayio, A., Peck, D.V., Stoddard, J.L., Tarquinio, E., Holdsworth, S.M., Van Sickle, J., Yuan, L.L., Hawkins, C.P., Herlihy, A.T., Kaufmann, P.R., Barbour, M.T., Larsen, D.P. and Olsen, A.R. (2008) Condition of Stream Ecosystems in the US: An Overview of the First National Assessment. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 27, 812-821. http://dx.doi.org/10.1899/08-098.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57827-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">USEPA (2009) National Lakes Assessment: A Collaborative Survey of the National’s Lakes. EPA 841-R-09-001 USEPA, Office of Water and Office of Research and Development, Washington DC, 118 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57827-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dudgeon, D., Arthington, A.H., Gessner, M.O., Kawabata, Z.I., Knowler, D.J., Lévêque, C., Naiman, R.J., Prieur-Richard, A.H., Soto, D., Stiassny, M.L.J. and Sullivan, C.A. (2006) Freshwater Biodiversity: Importance, Threats, Status and Conservation Challenges. Biological Reviews, 81, 163-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1464793105006950</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57827-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Locke, M.A., Tyler, D.D. and Gaston, L.A. (2010) Soil and Water Conservation in the Mid-South United States:  Lessons Learned and a Look to the Future. In: Zobeck, T.M. and Schillinger, W.F., Eds., Soil and Water Conservation Advances in the United States, SSSA Special Publication 60, SSSA, Madison, WI, 201-236.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57827-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diaz, R.J. and Rosenberg, R. (2008) Spreading Dead Zones and Consequences for Marine Ecosystems. Science, 321, 926-929. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1156401</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57827-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bianchi, T.S., DiMarco, S.F., Cowan, J.H., Hetland, R.D., Chapman, P., Day, J.W. and Allison, M.A. (2010) The Science of Hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico: A Review. Science of The Total Environment, 408, 1471-1484. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.11.047</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57827-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shields Jr., F.D. and Knight, S.S. (2010) Pre-Restoration Assessment, Big Sunflower River, Mississippi: Where to Begin? Proceedings of the 2010 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, Reston, VA, 16-20 May 2010, 1777-1787. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/41114(371)186</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57827-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Knight, S.S., Rebich, R.A., Smith Jr., S., Schreiber, J.D., Locke, M.A. and Hanks, J.E. (2002) The Mississippi Delta Management Systems Evaluation Area Project. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Diffuse Pollution, Amsterdam, 30 September-4 October 2002, 471-478.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57827-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pereira, W.E. and Hostettler, F.D. (1993) Nonpoint Source Contamination of the Mississippi River and Its Tributaries by Herbicides. Environmental Science and Technology, 27, 1542-1552. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es00045a008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57827-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Duda, A.M. and Johnson, R.J. (1985) Cost-Effective Targeting of Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution Controls. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 40, 103.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57827-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mueller, D.K., Hamilton, P.A., Helsel, D.R., Hitt, K.J. and Ruddy, B.C. (1995) Nutrients in Ground Water and Surface Water of the United States—An Analysis of Data through 1992. US Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 95-4031, 74 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57827-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Meade, R.H., Ed. (1995) Contaminants in the Mississippi River, 1987-1992. US Geological Survey Circular 1133, 140 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57827-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gilliom, R.J., Alexander, R.B. and Smith, R.A. (1985) Pesticides in the Nation’s Rivers, 1975-1980, and Implications for Future Monitoring. US Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2271, 26 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57827-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cooper, C.M., Bacon, E.J. and Ritchie, J.C. (1983) Biological Cycles in Lake Chicot, Arkansas. Proceedings of the Arkansas Lakes Symposium: Limnological Studies of Lake Chicot, Lake Chicot, 4-6 October 1983, 48-61.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57827-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Coleman, F.W. (1969) State-Wide Lake and Stream Survey. Completion Report Project F-8-R, Fisheries Division Mississippi Game and Fish Commission.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57827-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cooper, C.M. and Knight Jr., L.A. (1978) Fishes and Water Quality Conditions in Six-Mile Lake, Bear Creek Drainage, Mississippi. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Mississippi Chapter American Fisheries Society, 2, 27-36.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57827-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Knight, S.S., Starks, P.J., Hardegree, S. and Weltz, M. (1994) Scientific Challenges and Opportunities in Wetland and Riparian Research. Proceedings of the ARS Conference on. Hydrology, Denver, 13-15 September 1993, 147-162.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57827-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Waters, T.R. (1995) Sediment in Streams: Sources, Biological Effects, and Control. American Fisheries Society Monograph 7, 251 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57827-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Locke, M.A. (2004) Mississippi Delta Management Systems Evaluation Areas: Overview of Water Quality Issues on a Watershed Scale. In: Nett, M.T., Locke, M.A. and Pennington, D.A., Eds., Water Quality Assessments in the Mississippi Delta: Regional Solutions, National Scope, ACS Symposium Series 877, 1-15. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bk-2004-0877.ch001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57827-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cullum, R.F., Locke, M.A. and Knight, S.S. (2010) Effects of Conservation Reserve Program on Runoff and Lake Water Quality in an Oxbow Lake Watershed. Journal of International Environmental Application and Science, 5, 318-328.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57827-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Locke, M.A., Knight, S.S., Smith, S., Cullum, R.F., Zablotowicz, R.M., Yuan, Y. and Bingner, R.L. (2008) Environmental Quality Research in the Beasley Lake Watershed, 1995 to 2007: Succession from Conventional to Conservation Practices. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 63, 430-442. http://dx.doi.org/10.2489/jswc.63.6.430</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57827-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Rebich, R.A. and Knight, S.S., Eds. (2001) Mississippi Delta Management Systems Evaluation Areas Project, 1995-99. Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station Bulletin, 222 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57827-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">American Public Health Association (1998) Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water. 20th Edition, APHA, Washington DC, 1056 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57827-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boyd, C.E. (1990) Water Quality in Warmwater Fish Ponds. Auburn University Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn, AL, 359 p.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>