The experiment was carried out for two consecutive growing seasons (2012 and 2013) at the Research Site of the Lower Niger River Basin Development Authority, Ejiba, Kogi State of Nigeria (Lat. 8˚18'N and Long. 50˚39'E). The site is 1000 m above sea level, in the southern Guinea savanna agro-ecological zone of Nigeria, having hot, dry seasons and cool, wet seasons. The rainfall spans April to November and peaks in June while the dry season extends from December to March. The mean annual rainfall is 1570 mm per annum with an annual temperature range of 18˚C - 32˚C and mean relative humidity (RH) of 60% (Meteorological Data, 2011). The major soil order within the experimental site is Gleysol [12] [13] .

The experiment was sited within a 14 ha agricultural field that has been mechanically tilled and cropped with tropical arable crops (maize, cowpea, sorghum, garden egg, okra, tomato and cassava) continuously for over twenty years.

Soil moisture content was taken at 30 and 60 days after planting. Five undisturbed samples were collected at 0 - 15 cm depth from each plot using core samplers and were used for the determination of gravitational moisture content after oven drying at 100˚C for 24 hours. Soil temperature was determined at 15.00 hours (3 pm Nigerian time) with a soil thermometer inserted to 5 cm depth. Five readings were made per plot at each weekly determination and the average values recorded.

In order to determine some chemical properties of the soil before the treatments were applied, 20 random soil samples were collected from the field and bulked to for a composite sample. The sample was air-dried and sieved with a 2 mm sieve and analyzed in the laboratory for N, P, K, pH and Organic carbon. Total N (%) was determined by the macro-Kjeldahl method [14] . Available P (ppm) was determined using the Bray I method according to Olsen [15] . Soil pH values were obtained by using a HI9813-5 portable pH/EC/TDS/˚C meter (HANNA instruments, Romania, 2002). Soil organic carbon was determined by the Walkley-Black procedure [16] .

A split plot experiment was laid out in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications to randomize the tillage methods and foliar (Boost Extra) application in the main and sub-plots, respectively. The experiment comprised of three tillage methods, viz: No Tillage (NT), Manual Tillage (MT) and convectional tillage (Plough + Harrow + Ridge, PHR) and three foliar fertilizer rates: No Foliar, 2 and 4 liters/ha foliar fertilizer. The treatments were applied on the same plots in 2012 and 2013 growing seasons. Each plot was 10.0 m long and 5.0 m wide. A buffer zone of 4.0 m spacing was provided between plots. In both growing seasons, one of the most commercial acceptable varieties of sorghum (cv. F1) was planted on 25^th April manually at a spacing of 25 cm by 50 cm. A basal dose of phosphorus at 90 kg∙ha⁻¹ and nitrogen at 60 kg∙N∙ha⁻¹ was applied to all plots at the time of sowing. Foliar spray of Boost Extra at 0, 100 and 200 ml in 20 litres of water and a surfactant (Tween-80) was mixed at (1 ml/liter) with the solution to increase adhesion of solution on plant foliage. The required quantity of foliar spray of Boost Extra was applied to the crop at 30, 60and 90days after planting (DAP). The control treatment was sprayed with ordinary water. During the growing seasons, insecticides and fungicides were applied according to general local practices and recommendations. All other necessary operations except those under study were kept normal and uniform for all the treatments.

At 30 and 60 DAP, weed samples were collected from two 50 cm × 50 cm randomly laid quadrants in each plot. The weeds were identified up to species level, cut at the soil surface, oven-dried at 80˚C for 48 hours and weighed to determine the dry matter (DM) yield.

Root and shoot biomass, plant height, days to 50% flowering, grain yield and yield components in sorghum were monitored. Five plants were randomly sampled from 2 m² area at the center of each plot at 16 WAP and oven-dried at 80˚C for 48 hours for the determination of root and shoot dry matter yields. For root biomass determination, a cubic coring tool (10 × 10 × 10 cm) was drilled into the soil to a depth of 40 cm within the circumference of 5 sampled plants per plot. The excavated roots from the soil samples were put in 2 mm sieves and were gently washed free of soil in the laboratory using moderate jets of water. The values of plant height, leaf area, number of leaves per plant and stem girth were determined at 16 WAP. Leaf area was calculated as number of terminal leaflets (N) × 2.7 × 1/37 cm² [17] . Ten sorghum plants were harvested per plot at maturity for yield components determination. The components were: weight of panicle per plant (g), length of panicle (cm), seed weight per plant (g) and 1000 seed weight (g). Afterwards, the entire plots were separately harvested, threshed and grains were air-dried and weighed.

Data were statistically analyzed using GENSTAT. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to find out the significance of variation among the treatments while the significant means were separated using Duncan’s Multiple Range Test (DMRT) at 5% level of probability.

Different weed species, both grass weeds and broad-leaf weeds, were observed in the field during the experiment. The dry weight of grass weeds and broad-leaf weeds were significantly (P = 0.05) higher under no-tillage (NT) treatment. In contrast, significantly lower amounts of dry weight of grass and broad-leaf weeds were observed in the plots under MT and PHR treatments (Table 3). This may be due to the ability of tillage implements to turn over and cover crop residues and weeds. These results are in line with the results of [18] - [20] who also observed that reduced tillage treatment (no-tillage) had significantly higher grass and broad leaf weeds than the conventional tillage (PHR) treatment. This high weed density must have competed with sorghum for water and plant nutrients. Weeds that quickly emerge can hinder the growth of sorghum crop. [19] [21] reported that severe weed population pressure reduced overall crop yield in conventional tillage system. Plots to which Boost Extra was applied had higher weed dry weight than No Foliar (zero application) plots. This could be due to foliar nutrient drifts to weeds during treatment application.

In a column, figures bearing same letter (s) do not differ significantly at 5% level of probability by DMRT.

Soil bulk density is probably the most frequently measured soil quality parameter in tillage experiments [22] . The effect of the different tillage practices on bulk density in the 0 - 15 cm is shown in Table 4. Over the course of the study, tillage practices significantly affected soil dry bulk density. The No Tillage treatment recorded the highest bulk density at 30, 60 and 90 DAP (1.54, 1.60 and 1.62 g/cm³ respectively) significantly higher than that of the PHR followed by MT treatments. This is similar to the report of [23] . The Plough + harrow + ridge treatment produced higher bulk density compared to manual tillage. These findings widely agree with the results obtained by [24] working under Ferric Luvisol in the northern Guinea savannah zone of Ghana. Also, [25] , working under Ferric Luvisol in the rainforest zone at Akure in Nigeria reported similar results.

Tillage treatments showed significant increase in moisture content over time at 30, 60 and 90 DAP (Table 4). Manually tilled (MT) plots had the highest moisture contents (19.3%, 20.3% and 22.6% at 30, 60 and 90 DAP, respectively). This agrees with the findings of [23] who reported the highest moisture contents in Manually Tilled soil. In contrast, [25] and [26] observed higher soil moisture contents in No Tillage plots, compared with that of disc-ploughed followed by disc-harrowed plots.

Foliar fertilizer application had no significant effect on soil physical properties in this investigation (Table 4).

The tillage methods influenced growth and yield parameters of sorghum in this study (Table 5). The highest values of plant height (257 cm) and leaf area (1.5 m²) were obtained from Manual Tillage plots which was significantly higher (P = 0.05) than values obtained in plots with PHR or NT treatments (Table 5). The result was in line [27] who obtained highest values of growth parameters (plant height, leaf area and stem girth) from manually tilled plots which were significantly higher (P = 0.05) than values obtained with ploughing plus harrowing.

Records of 50% flowering showed that the highest values under manual tillage but this was not significantly higher (P = 0.05) than plots with NT and PHR treated plants. Plough + harrow + ridge plots (PHR) produced the highest grain yield (0.78 t/ha) and 1000 seed weight (21.37 g, Table 6). This was closely followed by MT plots (0.74 t/ha and 20.3 g, respectively). In all tillage methods, plats on NT plots produced the least values of growth and yield characters considered in this work (Table 6).

[28] worked on the response of soil properties and Sorghum to tillage and applied poultry manure in the forest-savanna transition zone of Nigeria. He observed that manually tilled soil produced the highest values of growth and yield components of Sorghum and he attributed this to favorable soil conditions resulting from minimal disturbance of the land. Lower performance of plough + harrow + ridge plots in terms of growth and yield characters could be due to deterioration of soil quality resulting from passage of implement [29] [30] .

In a column, figures bearing same letter (s) do not differ significantly at 5% level of probability by DMRT.

In a column, figures bearing same letter (s) do not differ significantly at 5% level of probability by DMRT.

In a column, figures bearing same letter (s) do not differ significantly at 5% level of probability by DMRT.

No Tillage plots recorded the least plant height, leaf area, stem girth, grain weight and grain yield in this study. Foliar fertilizer application improved significantly (P = 0.05) the growth and yield components of sorghum over unfertilized plots (Table 6). The application of foliar reduced the number of days to attain 50% flowering by one day, but significantly increased (P = 0.05) plant height and stem girth over the unfertilized plants (Table 5).

[31] reported increase in growth and biological yield of wheat by foliar application of zinc. In this work, the grain yield also increased significantly with foliar application of Boost Extra (Table 5). Maximum grain yield was produced by 4 l/ha Boost Extra spray, while minimum grain yield was produced in No Foliar application plots. All spray application levels were found beneficial as compared to control (water spray) on sorghum. The results are in conformity with [32] who reported increased straw yield with foliar application of N. [33] concluded that a multi-component foliar fertilizer containing N significantly increased the yield of cabbage. The high efficiency of Boost Extra application observed in this study is in agreement with the findings of [34] for onion and [35] for “Faba” bean.