<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">OJAppS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Applied Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2165-3917</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ojapps.2015.56030</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">OJAppS-57320</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject><subject> Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject><subject> Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Modeling and Simulation of Hot Metal Desulfurization by Powder Injection
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>iguel</surname><given-names>A. Barron</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Isaias</surname><given-names>Hilerio</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Dulce</surname><given-names>Y. Medina</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Departmento de Materiales, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana Azcapozalco, Mexico City, Mexico</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>bmma@correo.azc.uam.mx(IAB)</email>;<email>ihc@correo.azc.uam.mx(IH)</email>;<email>dyolotzin@correo.azc.uam.mx(DYM)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>27</day><month>05</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>06</issue><fpage>295</fpage><lpage>303</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>27</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>20</month>	<year>June</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>23</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The desulfurization of hot metal by the mono-injection of lime powder and the co-injection of lime, calcium carbide and magnesium powders is mathematically modeled. The mono-injection model is derived from the continuity equation and is validated using experimental results and data previously reported in the literature. The co-injection model and the rate constant of the injected mixture are determined from the molar fractions and rate constants of the individual powders. The effect of the lime content of the mixture on the desulfurization dynamics is studied and discussed.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>CFD Simulation</kwd><kwd> Co-Injection Desulfurization</kwd><kwd> Hot Metal Desulfurization</kwd><kwd> Lime Injection</kwd><kwd> Powder Mono-Injection</kwd><kwd> Powder Desulfurization</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Current industrial consumers demand high quality steels with tight chemical specifications, superior mechanical performances and low impurity contents. Particularly, sulfur is a detrimental impurity which causes brittleness and granular cracks in steels and adversely affects mechanical properties such as ductility and impact toughness. Therefore, hot metal from blast furnaces must be treated prior to the oxygen steelmaking in order to obtain steels with low sulfur contents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57320-ref1">1</xref>] . In the desulfurization process, powdered reagents are injected into the hot metal through an immersed lance using an inert carrier gas such as argon or nitrogen, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. The reagents chemically react with the dissolved sulfur forming a sulfide that ascends and is captured in the slag layer that covers the melt. Lime, calcium carbide and magnesium are the powdered reagents commonly employed for the hot metal desulfurization [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57320-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>Nowadays, some technology suppliers are offering to steelmakers desulfurization systems based on the simultaneous injection, namely co-injection, multiple-injection or mono-injection of diverse powdered reagents</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> The desulfurization process of hot metal by powder injection</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2310416x5.png"/></fig><p>for manufacturing ultralow sulfur steels [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57320-ref3">3</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57320-ref5">5</xref>] . They promise market-driven innovation, enhanced injection process, flexible production execution, highest availability, cost reduction, and so on [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57320-ref3">3</xref>] . Many experimental [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57320-ref6">6</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57320-ref9">9</xref>] and numerical [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57320-ref10">10</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57320-ref13">13</xref>] works have been published in the specialized literature concerning the hot metal desulfurization. Some of them [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57320-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57320-ref15">15</xref>] report mathematical models on co-injection of desulfurization using several powders; however they are so complex that practical applications by plant engineers are hard to implement.</p><p>In this work, isothermal mathematical models to simulate the hot metal desulfurization by the mono-injection of lime powder and the co-injection of lime, calcium carbide and magnesium powders are developed and presented. The mono-injection model is derived from the continuity equation and is validated using experimental results and data from literature. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are carried out to verify the simplification assumptions made to the continuity equation. The co-injection model uses a rate constant for the mixture which is determined from the molar fractions and rate constants of the individual powders. The effect of the lime content of the mixture on the desulfurization dynamics and reaction half-life is analyzed.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Mono-Injection Desulfurization Modeling</title><p>The equation of continuity in cylindrical coordinates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57320-ref16">16</xref>] can be employed to mathematically represent the desulfurization process:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57320-formula569"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2310416x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where S is the sulfur concentration in hot metal, t is time, and r, θ and z are the radial, the angular and the axial components of the cylindrical coordinates, respectively; v<sub>r</sub>, v<sub>θ</sub> and v<sub>z</sub> are the components of the velocity vector in the r, θ and z directions. Besides, r<sub>S</sub> is the rate of disappearance of S by chemical reaction and D<sub>S</sub> is the diffusion coefficient of sulfur in the hot metal.</p><p>Given that the bubbles of the carrier gas are mainly moving in the axial direction, one can assume that the desulfurization phenomenon is predominant in that direction; then Equation (1) is reduced to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57320-formula570"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2310416x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Furthermore, considering that: 1) the diffusion of sulfur is small compared to its convective transport and 2) the vessel is a well stirred tank with small concentration gradients, then Equation (2) is simplified to an ordinary differential equation:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57320-formula571"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2310416x8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The desulfurization reactions are first order chemical reactions whose kinetics can be expressed as follows [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57320-ref17">17</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57320-formula572"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2310416x9.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where k is the reaction rate constant and S<sub>e</sub> is the value of the sulfur concentration at thermodynamic equilibrium. The reaction rate constant is a temperature-dependent term which is well represented by Arrhenius’s law [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57320-ref18">18</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57320-formula573"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2310416x10.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where k<sub>0</sub> is the pre-exponential constant, E<sub>a</sub> is the reaction activation energy, R is the universal gas constant and T is the absolute temperature.</p><p>Substituting Equation (4) into Equation (3) and integrating one obtains</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57320-formula574"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2310416x11.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where S<sub>0</sub> is the initial concentration of S.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Desulfurization with Mono-Injection of Lime Powder</title><p>In addition to its dependence on temperature, rate constant of Equation (6) depends on a lot of factors, such as lime particle diameter, carrier gas bubble diameter, residence time of particles, hot metal density, hot metal viscosity and so on. In [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57320-ref17">17</xref>] , the rate constant for lime desulfurization is determined from</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57320-formula575"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2310416x12.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where β is the mass transfer coefficient, t<sub>R</sub> is the mean residence time of lime particles in the melt, q<sub>CaO</sub> is the lime flow rate, ρ<sub>M</sub> is the hot metal density, d<sub>p</sub> is the lime particle diameter, w<sub>M</sub> is the hot metal weight and ρ<sub>CaO</sub> is the lime density.</p><p>Given that the lime particles are upwards transported by the carrier gas bubbles, the mean residence time of the particles can be estimated from the rise velocity of the gas bubbles v<sub>b</sub>:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57320-formula576"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2310416x13.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where h<sub>i</sub> is the immersion depth of the injection lance. The rise velocity of argon bubbles is estimated here from the well known Stoke’s law:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57320-formula577"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2310416x14.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where g is the gravity constant, ρ<sub>g</sub> is the carrier gas density, d<sub>b</sub> is the bubble diameter and μ<sub>M</sub> is the melt viscosity.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Validation of the Mono-Injection Model</title><p>The mono-injection mathematical model is validated using the results reported in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57320-ref17">17</xref>] for the desulfurization of hot metal with lime in a cylindrical ladle of 150 metric tons of hot metal with an initial sulfur concentration of 0.1 weight percent and 2400 s of injection time. The remainder parameters are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>From the parameter values of <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, the following values of the rate constant, the bubble rise velocity and the mean residence time, respectively, are obtained: k = 0.001684 s <sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>, v<sub>b</sub> = 0.7938 m s<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>, t<sub>R</sub> = 2.52 s. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows a comparison between the results of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57320-ref17">17</xref>] and the present mono-injection model using Equation (6). The observed agreement is fine, and this gives good confidence in the results of the subsequent co-injection simulations.</p><p>In order to verify the assumption that the vessel is a well stirred tank, isothermal transient 2D Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations are carried out using the parameter values given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. The equations of continuity and momentum, the Volume of Fluid (VOF) model for multiphase flow and the classical K-ε model for turbulence modeling are employed in the CFD simulations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57320-ref19">19</xref>] . The boundary conditions for K and ɛ in</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Parameter values employed in the mono-injection model validation</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameter</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Value</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Mass transfer coefficient (β)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.3 &#215; 10<sup>−</sup><sup>5</sup> m∙s<sup>−</sup><sup>1 </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lime flow rate (q<sub>CaO</sub>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.25 kg s<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hot metal density (ρ<sub>M</sub>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7100.0 kg∙m<sup>−</sup><sup>3 </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lime particle diameter (d<sub>p</sub>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0 &#215; 10<sup>−</sup><sup>5</sup> m</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hot metal weight (w<sub>M</sub>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >150000.0 kg</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lime density (ρ<sub>CaO</sub>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3345.0 kg∙m<sup>−</sup><sup>3 </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lance immersion depth (h<sub>im</sub>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0 m</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gravity constant (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.81 m∙s<sup>−</sup><sup>2 </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carrier gas density (ρ<sub>g</sub>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.165 kg∙m<sup>−</sup><sup>3 </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bubble diameter (d<sub>b</sub>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0011725 m</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hot metal viscosity (μ<sub>M</sub>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0067 kg∙m<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>∙s<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Equilibrium sulfur concentration, S<sub>e</sub><sub> </sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0 wt%</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison between results of [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57320-ref17">17</xref>] and the present model</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2310416x15.png"/></fig><p>the lance nozzles are determined from the expressions.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57320-formula578"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2310416x16.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.57320-formula579"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2310416x17.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where d<sub>n</sub> is nozzle diameter.</p><p>For d<sub>n</sub> = 0.02 m and a lance with two nozzles, Equations (10)-(11) yield K<sub>in</sub> = 0.0063 and ɛ<sub>in</sub> = 0.05. For an injection angle of 45 degrees, the velocity components of v<sub>b</sub> are as follows: for the left nozzle, v<sub>x</sub> = v<sub>y</sub> = −0.5613 m∙s<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>; for the right nozzle, v<sub>x</sub> = 0.5613 m∙s<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>, v<sub>y</sub> = −0.5613 m∙s<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> shows the distribution of phases for t = 5 s. The argon bubbles ascend to the hot metal surface in the vicinity of the walls of the immersion lance, however many bubbles spread to the vessel walls, mainly in the upper section of the ladle. Given that the ascending bubbles cause convective movement and agitation of the hot metal, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> suggests that the assumption of considering the vessel as a well agitated tank is valid. This assumption is corroborated with the corresponding hot metal streamlines depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>, where significant hot metal agitation in the vessel bottom is observed.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Co-Injection Desulfurization Modeling</title><p>Desulfurization of hot metal by co-injection with three powders: lime (CaO), calcium carbide (CaC<sub>2</sub>) and magnesium</p><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> CFD simulation of argon bubbles (yellow) ascending through the hot metal (red)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2310416x18.png"/></fig><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Streamlines in the hot metal produced by the argon ascending bubbles</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2310416x19.png"/></fig><p>(Mg), is considered in this work. The corresponding desulfurization chemical reactions are as follows [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57320-ref1">1</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57320-formula580"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2310416x20.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.57320-formula581"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2310416x21.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.57320-formula582"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2310416x22.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where ( ) and [ ] means the slag and the metal phase, respectively. In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> are shown the individual rate constants of the powders considered.</p><p>Mathematical modeling of powder co-injection is not an easy task given that several reagents are reacting simultaneously with sulfur, each one with its own rate constant and physicochemical properties. In this work a mixture rate constant is proposed based on assigning a weight to each individual powder in accordance to its mol fraction in the co-injected mixture:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57320-formula583"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2310416x23.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where k<sub>m</sub> is the rate constant of the co-injected mixture, x<sub>i</sub> is the mol fraction of the i<sup>th</sup> powder, k<sub>i</sub> is the rate constant of the i<sup>th</sup> powder, and n is the number of powders injected. Five mixtures are considered for co-injection, whose weight percent composition and rate constants are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. As is observed, the rate constant depends on the proportion of powders in the mixture. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> shows that the reaction constant of the mixture decreases as the lime content is increased.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Results and Comments</title><p>Results for the mono-injection of the powders considered are depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> using an initial sulfur concentration of 0.1 weight percent. This figure shows that, among the three powders considered, lime yields the slowest dynamics for desulfurization, particularly during the first half of the injection process. At the end of the injection, the final sulfur concentration is low and similar for calcium carbide (0.0002773 wt%) and magnesium (0.0002863 wt%), whereas for lime is relatively high (0.00176 wt%). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> suggests that calcium carbide is the most efficient desulfurization powder from the chemical kinetics viewpoint, followed by magnesium, however, their cost prevents their wider usage in plants.</p><p>Results of numerical simulations for co-injection using the mixtures of <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> are seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>. The fastest desulfurization dynamics occurs for the mixture number 1, whose lime content is null. As the lime content in the mixture is raised, the sulfur concentration in the hot metal exhibits a slower decay. This is explained by the fact that the mixture rate constant decreases as the lime content is increased, as is observed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>.</p><p>The half-life of a chemical reaction, t<sub>h</sub>, is defined as the time needed for the concentration of reactants to drop to one-half the initial value [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57320-ref18">18</xref>] . For a first order chemical reaction t<sub>h</sub> is determined from the expression</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57320-formula584"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2310416x24.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Reaction rate constants of the powders considered</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Powder</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Reaction rate constant, k (s<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Lime (CaO)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001684 (present model)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Calcium carbide (CaC<sub>2</sub>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.004 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57320-ref20">20</xref>]</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Magnesium (Mg)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00244 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57320-ref21">21</xref>]</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Co-injected mixtures and average rate constant</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mixture</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CaO (wt%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >CaC<sub>2</sub> (wt%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Mg (wt%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Rate constant, k<sub>m</sub> (s<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002869</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002664</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002412</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.002095</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.001684</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Mono-injection desulfurization of hot metal with lime (solid line), calcium carbide (dotted line) and magnesium (dashed line) powders</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2310416x25.png"/></fig><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Desulfurization behavior under co-injection using the mixtures of <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2310416x26.png"/></fig><fig id="fig7"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref></label><caption><title> Half-life of the desulfurization reaction as function of the lime content in the co-injected mixture</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-2310416x27.png"/></fig><p>Essentially, t<sub>h</sub> evaluates the slowness of a chemical reaction in this way: as t<sub>h</sub> is increased, the slower the reaction becomes. This concept is applied here to the co-injection desulfurization process using the mixture rate constants of <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, and results are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig7">Figure 7</xref> as function of the mixture lime content. It is observed that as the lime content in the mixture is increased, t<sub>h</sub> is decreased. This result is consistent with the results of <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>7. Conclusions</title><p>The mono-injection and the co-injection desulfurization of hot metal with powdered reagents is mathematically modeled in this work assuming that the diffusion of sulfur is small compared to its convective transport and that the vessel is a well stirred tank with small concentration gradients. Lime, calcium carbide and magnesium powders are considered in the co-injection process. From the isothermal numerical simulations the following conclusions arise:</p><p>1) The bubbles of the carrier gas promote the agitation of the bath, and CFD simulations corroborate the validity of the well stirred tank assumption which allows the simplification of the continuity equation.</p><p>2) The mono-injection desulfurization model using lime powder is validated with data previously reported in the literature, and represents properly, in a quantitative way, the corresponding process. This model takes into account those parameters that are significant from the physical and chemical points of view.</p><p>3) A simple model based on the molar fraction and rate constant of the individual powders is proposed to determine the rate constant of the co-injected mixture.</p><p>4) Lime content of the mixture determines the speed of the co-injection desulfurization dynamics. This is more evident in the first half of the process. As the lime content of the lime-calcium carbide-magnesium mixture is increased, the half-life of the desulfurization chemical reaction is increased.</p><p>5) The numerical results suggest that, in order to increase the co-injection desulfurization rate, the lime content in the mixture must be reduced. Among the powders considered, lime is the cheapest one. However, previous to make a decision in the plant about the lime content, a deep analysis must be carried out by each steelmaking shop in order to balance economical, technical and productivity factors.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.57320-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fruehan, R.J. (1998) The Making, Shaping and Treating of Steel. In: Steelmaking and Refining Volume, 11th Edition, Association of Iron and Steel Engineers, Pittsburgh, Chapter 7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57320-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lindstrom, D., Nortier, P. and Sichen, D. (2014) Functions of CaO and Mg-CaO Mixtures in Hot Metal Desulfurization. Steel Research International, 85, 76-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/srin.201300071</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57320-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Siemens VAI (2012) Hot Metal Desulfurization with Injection Technology. Metals Technologies GmbH, Linz. 
http://www.industry.siemens.com/datapool/industry/industrysolutions/metals/simetal/en/HM-De-S-en.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57320-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">http://www.alzchem.com/en/markets-products/metallurgy/hot-metal-desulfurisation/hot-meal-desulfurisation-basic-products</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57320-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Satyendra (2013) Desulphurization of Hot Metal. http://ispatguru.com/desulphurization-of-hot-metal/</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57320-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Diao, J., Xie, B. and Wang, S.S. (2009) Research on Slag Modifying Agents for CaO-Mg Based Hot-Metal Desulphurisation. Ironmaking and Steelmaking, 36, 543-547. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/174328109X445642</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57320-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kikuchi, N., Nabeshima, S. and Kishimoto, Y. (2012) Effect of Propane Gas on Hot Metal Desulfurization by CaO Based Flux. ISIJ International, 52, 1809-1816. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/174328109X445642</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57320-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kumar, A., Chacko, Z., Malathi, M., Godiwalla, K.M., Ajmani, S.K. and Ranganathan, S. (2013) Desulfurization of Hot Metal through in Situ Generation of Magnesium in 30-kg Molten Iron Bath-Influence of Inert Gas Flow Rate. Steel Research International, 85, 927-934. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/srin.201300374</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57320-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lindstrom, D. and Sichen, D. (2015) Kinetic Study of Desulfurization of Hot Metal Using CaO and CaC2. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 46B, 83-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11663-014-0195-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57320-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shao, P., Zhang, T., Zhang, Z. and Liu, Y. (2014) Numerical Simulation of Gas-Liquid Flow in Mechanical-Gas Injection Coupled Stirred System. ISIJ International, 54, 1507-1516. http://dx.doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.54.1507</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57320-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, Y., Bao, Y., Wang, M., Zhao, L. and Peng, Z. (2014) A Mathematical Model for the Dynamic Desulfurization Process of Ultra-Low-Sulfur Steel in the LF Refining Process. Metallurgical Research &amp; Technology, 111, 37-43. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/metal/2014006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57320-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zou, Z., Zou, Y., Zhang, L. and Wang, N. (2001) Mathematical Model of Hot Metal Desulphurization by Powder In jection. ISIJ International, 41, S66-S69. http://dx.doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.41.Suppl_S66</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57320-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pirker, S., Gittler, P., Pirker, H. and Lehner, J. (1999) CFD, A Design Tool for a New Hot Metal Desulfurization Technology. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on CFD in the Minerals and Process Industries, CSIRO, Melbourne, 6-8 December 1999.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57320-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Seshadri, V., da Silva, C., da Silva, I. and Kruger, P. (1997) A Kinetic Model Applied to the Molten Pig Iron Desulfurization by Injection of Lime-Based Powders. ISIJ International, 37, 21-30. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.37.21</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57320-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lou, W. and Zhu, M. (2014) Numerical Simulation of Desulfurization Behavior in Gas-Stirred Systems Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics-Simultaneous Reaction Model (CFD-SRM) Coupled Model. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B, 45, 1706-1722. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11663-014-0105-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57320-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bird, R., Stewart, W.E. and Lightfoot, E.N. (2002) Transport Phenomena. 2nd Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57320-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oeters, F. (1989) Metallurgy of Steelmaking. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57320-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Levenspiel, O. (1999) Chemical Reaction Engineering. Third Edition, John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57320-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fluent (2003) Fluent 6.1 User’s Guide. NH, Lebanon.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57320-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhao, Y. (1992) The Role of Oxygen in Hot Metal Desulphurization with Calcium Carbide Powder Injection. Ph.D. Thesis, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57320-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Irons, G.A. and Guthrie, R.I.L. (1981) The Kinetics of Molten Iron Desulfurization Using Magnesium Vapor. Metallurgical Transactions B, 12, 755-767. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02654145</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>