<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Detection</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Detection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2331-2076</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/detection.2015.31001</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">Detection-57270</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Estimation of Natural Radioactivity of Some Medicinal or Herbal Plants Used in Iraq
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>aith</surname><given-names>A. Najam</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nada</surname><given-names>F. Tafiq</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Fouzey</surname><given-names>H. Kitah</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Ministry of Science and Technology, Baghdad, Iraq</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Physics Department, College of Science, Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Physics Department, College of Science, University of Mosul, Mosul, Iraq</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>Prof.lai2014@gmail.com(AAN)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>19</day><month>06</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>01</issue><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>7</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>7</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>16</month>	<year>June</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>19</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Nine medicinal or herbal plants used in Iraq were analyzed to determine natural radioactivity. The radionuclides were determined by Gross alpha, beta and gamma spectrometry Proportional counter + NaI(Tl) detector type(XLB5) and gamma-ray spectroscopy with (HPGe) techniques. The activity concentration of 40K ranged from 124.1 Bq/kg in (Crust sample) to 88.3 Bq/kg in (Chamomile sample), for gross alpha ranged from (N.D.) in (Flax sample) to 0.4 cpm in (Anise sample), while for beta ranged from 5.7 cpm in (Flax sample) to 25.6 cpm in (Latency sample) and for gamma ranged from 0.6 cpm in (Thyme sample) to 5.10 cpm in (Coriander and Flax samples).
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Medicinal Plants</kwd><kwd> Alpha Cross</kwd><kwd> Natural Radioactivity</kwd><kwd> Beta Cross</kwd><kwd> Gamma Spectroscopy</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The natural plants which are used for the treatment of living beings are known as medicinal plant. More than five hundred types of medicinal plants are being used as raw materials of drugs. Medicinal plants are unique type of natural product requiring special consideration due to their potential impact on human health. The pharmacological properties of the medicinal plants have been attributed to the presence of active chemical constituents which are responsible for important physiological function in living organisms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57270-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>Naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM) are found in every constituent of the environment: air, water, soil, food and in humans. According to the International Food Safety Authorities Network [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57270-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57270-ref3">3</xref>] , plants used as food commonly have <sup>40</sup>K, <sup>232</sup>Th and <sup>238</sup>U and their progenies. It is expected that likewise would be found in plants used for medicinal purpose since plants are the primary pathway of natural radionuclides entering into the human body through the food chain. Radionuclides and their decay products from <sup>238</sup>U and <sup>232</sup>Th series together with <sup>40</sup>K are terrestrial primordial radionuclides, which originated from the earth’s crust and are the sources of natural radioactivity in the environment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57270-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>Human exposure to radiation in the environment is from sources that are widely used in industry, agriculture, as well as for scientific and medical purpose. Traditional medicine involving use of grasses and herbs is the most ancient method of curing diseases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57270-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>In Nigeria, there is shift of interest to the use herbal medicine for the cure of diverse diseases. Apart from the high cost of procuring available allopathic medicines for treating even common health disorders, other reasons for this shift are inaccessibility of health institutions in the rural or remote locations in the country and the growing awareness of adverse reaction to some allopathic drugs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57270-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>Herbal or medicinal plant products, in various forms, have been used to treat illness for many hundreds of years on all continents and within cultures across the world. About 70% - 80% of the world populations, especially in the developing countries, rely on nonconventional medicine in their primary health care [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57270-ref7">7</xref>] . An emerging problem in many developing countries is industrial pollution that causes contamination of vegetation with heavy metals, pesticides, or radioactivity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57270-ref8">8</xref>] . Therefore the medical properties and effectiveness of medicinal plants depend on environmental conditions, which also have a direct influence on their growth in the place of their occurrence and cultivation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57270-ref9">9</xref>] . Moreover, medicinal plants are not included in the past, possibly because the ingestion of radioactive material through their consumption had been recognized or was considered insignificant. As mankind uses traditional herbal medicine for the treatment of various diseases and aliments, the study of radionuclide concentration in such plants has great significance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57270-ref10">10</xref>] . The objective of this study is to determine the natural radioactivity presented in some selected medicinal plants commonly used in Iraq and to assess the radiological risk associated with the use of these medicinal plants.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Methods and Materials</title><p>Gross alpha, beta and gamma spectrometry (Proportional counter + NaI detector) type (XLB5) and gamma-ray spectroscopy with (HPGe) techniques were used to determine the concentrations of the radioactive isotopes <sup>40</sup>K, <sup>226</sup>Ra and <sup>232</sup>Th.</p><p>Samples of medical herbs imported to Iraq were collected from the local markets of Iraq, nine types of herbs shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, each sample was dried and blended until it became powder.</p><p>The gross alpha, beta and gamma spectrometry includes gas-flow proportional counters for alpha and beta counting and sodium iodide NaI(Tl) scintillation detector for gamma ray in the same system, using software package type ECLIPS [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57270-ref11">11</xref>] . (100 g) weight of the powdered sample placed in a bowl blanchet made of stainless steel material and into custom place to counting the total alpha, beta and gamma.</p><p>The gamma-ray spectroscopy system consists of high purity germanium (HpGe) detector with a relative efficiency of (40%), 1.95 keV energy resolution (FWHM) at energy peak of 1332 KeV of <sup>60</sup>Co isotope. A multichannel analyzer (MCA) with 4096 channel was used. A detector shield had a cavity adequate to accommodate large samples. The shield had lead walls with 10 cm thickness lined inside with graded absorber of Cd ~1.6 mm Cu ~0.4 mm.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Herbal or medicinal samples investigated in this study</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Samples Codes</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Samples Names</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fenugreek</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Thyme</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chamomile</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anise</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coriander</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Flax</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Latency</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Berry</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crust</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Calibration and efficiency of the system were carried out using multi-gamma ray standard source (MGS-5, Canberra) of Marinelli beaker geometry. A library of radionuclide’s which contained the energy of the characteristic gamma emissions of each nuclide was analyzed and their corresponding emission probabilities were built from the data supplied in the software.</p><p>Samples were placed in Marinelli beaker sealed off and kept for one month to achieve radioactive secular equilibrium between <sup>226</sup>Ra and <sup>222</sup>Rn and daughter nuclei.</p><p>In order to determine the background distribution due to naturally occurring radionuclide’s in the environment around the detector, an empty Marinelli beaker container was counted in the same manner as the samples.</p><p>After measurement and subtraction of the background, the activity concentrations were calculated.</p><p>Each sample was ground into a fine powder with a particle size &lt;1 mm, 500 gm of each samples were put into standard Marinelli beaker and the activity concentrations for the natural radionuclide’s in the measured samples were computed using the following relation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57270-ref12">12</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57270-formula8"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1700020x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where N(E, i) is the net counts for the radionuclide i at energy E, εγ(E) is the photopeak efficiency at energy E, Tc is the counting live-time (s), Pγ(E, i) is the gamma emission probability of the radionuclide i for a transition at energy E, M is the dry-weight of samples (kg).</p><p>The average annual committed effective dose, Eave, for ingestion of NORMS in the medicinal plants was calculated using the expression in equation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57270-ref13">13</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.57270-formula9"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1700020x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where DCF<sub>ing</sub> is the dose convection factor for ingestion, for each radionuclide (i.e., 4.5 &#215; 10<sup>−</sup><sup>5</sup> mSv/Bq, 2.3 &#215; 10<sup>−4</sup> mSv/Bq and 6.2 &#215; 10<sup>−6</sup> mSv/Bq<sup> </sup>for <sup>238</sup>U, <sup>232</sup>Th and <sup>40</sup>K respectively for an adult) (UNSCEAR, 2000), I<sub>p</sub> is the consumption rate from intake of NORMS in medicinal plants and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1700020x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the activity concentration in the plant sample.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>Results of gross alpha, beta, gamma and gamma spectroscopy analysis of medical herbals are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. <sup>40</sup>K Activity Concentration</title><p>The activity concentrations of <sup>40</sup>K have been determined for various medical herbals. <sup>40</sup>K (Bq/kg) were ranged from 883.3 &#177; 85.8 in Chamomile sample to 124.1 &#177; 9.5 Bq/kg in Crust sample. The maximum level of <sup>40</sup>K con-</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> The results of gross alpha, beta, gamma and specific activity of <sup>40</sup>K for some herbal samples used in Iraq</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Samples codes</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Traditional name</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Gross Alpha (cpm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Gross Beta (cpm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Gross Gamma (cpm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Specific activity (Bq/kg) of <sup>40</sup>K</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Average annual Effective dose (mSv/y)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fenugreek</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20 &#177; 0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.40 &#177; 1.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.40 &#177; 3.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >231.5 &#177; 50.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00258 &#177; 0.00056</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Thyme</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30 &#177; 0.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.90 &#177; 1.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.60 &#177; 3.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >587.0 &#177; 44.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00655 &#177; 0.00049</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chamomile</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10 &#177; 0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.90 &#177; 1.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.10 &#177; 3.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >883.3 &#177; 85.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00985 &#177; 0.00096</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Anise</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.40 &#177; 0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.50 &#177; 1.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.30 &#177; 3.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >498.2 &#177; 29.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00557 &#177; 0.00033</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Coriander</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20 &#177; 0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.60 &#177; 1.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.10 &#177; 3.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >451.2 &#177; 34.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00503 &#177; 0.00039</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Flax</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >N.D.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.70 &#177; 0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.10 &#177; 3.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >171.1 &#177; 13.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00193 &#177; 0.00014</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Latency</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10 &#177; 0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.60 &#177; 1.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.90 &#177; 3.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >565.8 &#177; 32.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0063 &#177; 0.00036</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Berry</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10 &#177; 0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.80 &#177; 1.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.10 &#177; 3.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >208.0 &#177; 15.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00232 &#177; 0.00017</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Crust</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20 &#177; 0.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.20 &#177; 0.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.00 &#177; 3.79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >124.1 &#177; 9.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.00138 &#177; 0.00011</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>centrations were in Chamomile sample (883.3 &#177; 85.8 Bq/kg). The high activity concentration of Potassium recorded for Chamomile samples differs geographically from one soil of cultivation to another and some plants also may be due to the fact that, the activity concentrations differ geographically from one soil of cultivation to another and some plants also absorb certain elements more than others as presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Gross Alpha (cpm)</title><p>In all samples the gross alpha in medical herbals were ranged from 0.40 &#177; 0.2 cpm in Anise sample to N.D. cpm in Flax sample, Latency and Berry samples. The results of gross alpha were shown graphically in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Gross Beta (cpm)</title><p>In all samples the gross beta in medical herbals were ranged from 25.60 &#177; 1.60 cpm in Latency sample to 5.70 &#177; 0.75 cpm in Flax sample. The results of gross beta were shown graphically in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>.</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Specific activity (Bq/kg) concentration of <sup>40</sup>K for herbal samples</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1700020x9.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Gross alpha (cpm) concentration for some herbal samples</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1700020x10.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Gross Gamma (cpm)</title><p>In all samples the gross gamma in medical herbals were ranged from 5.10 &#177; 3.79 cpm in Coriander and Flax samples to 0.60 &#177; 3.71 cpm in Chamomile sample. The results of gross gamma were shown graphically in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Average Annual Committed Effective Dose in the Medicinal Plants</title><p>The average annual committed effective doses due to the ingestion of <sup>40</sup>K in the medicinal plant are also presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. The average annual committed effective dose varied from 0.00138 &#177; 0.00011 to 0.00985 &#177; 0.00096 mSv/y with an average of 0.00046 &#177; 0.00026 mSv/y. The highest average was recorded for Chamomile whiles Crust and Flax samples had the lowest. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> shows the average annual effective dose distribution in the medicinal plant samples.</p><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Gross beta (cpm) concentration for some herbal samples</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1700020x11.png"/></fig><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Gross gamma (cpm) concentration for some herbal samples</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1700020x12.png"/></fig><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Average annual committed effective dose (mSv/y)</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-1700020x13.png"/></fig><p>The calculated average annual effective dose to any individual in the population group due to the ingestion of natural radionuclides in the medicinal plants is below the average radiation dose of 0.3 mSv/y received per head worldwide (UNSCEAR, 2000).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>The average activity concentration obtained for <sup>40</sup>K obtained in this study (431.35 Bq/kg) is less than other values of <sup>40</sup>K in other studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57270-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57270-ref14">14</xref>] . Results of gross alpha, beta and gamma are slightly low.</p><p>The corresponding average annual effective dose determined in this study to any individual’s organ or tissue in the population group due to the ingestion of natural radionuclides in the medicinal plants is far below the average radiation dose of 0.3 mSv/y received per head worldwide due to the ingestion of natural radionuclide (UNSCEAR, 2000).</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.57270-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fahad, S.M., Abdin, M.J., Hasan, M.M., Rahman, M.O., Islam, S.M.A., Akramuzzaman, M.M. and Russell, M. (2014) Study of Elemental Profile of Some Medicinal Plants of Bangladesh. Journal of Nuclear and Particle Physics, 4, 1-6.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57270-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">INFOSAN (2011) Information on Nuclear Accidents and Radioactive Contamination of Foods International Food Safety Authorities Network. World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57270-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tettey-Labri, L., Darko, E.O., Schandorf, C. and Appiah, A.A. (2013) Natural Radioactivity Levels of Some Medicinal Plants Commonly Used in Chana. SpringerPlus, 2, 157-185.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57270-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kessaratikoon, P. and Awaekchi, S. (2008) Natural Radioactivity Measurement in Soil Samples Collected from Municipal Area of Hat Yai District in Songkhla Province, Thailand. KMITL Science Journal, 8, 52-58.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57270-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Iwu, M.M. (1993) Handbook of African Medicinal Plants. CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, 309-330.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57270-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oni, O.M., Isola, G.A., Oni, F.G.O. and Sowole, O. (2011) Natural Activity Concentrations and Assessment of Radiological Dose Equivalents in Medicinal Plants around Oil and Gas Facilities in Ughelli and Environs, Nigeria. Environment and Natural Resources Research, 1, 201-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/enrr.v1n1p201</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57270-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chan, K. (2003) Some Aspects of Toxic Contaminates in Herbal Medicine. Chemosphere, 52, 1361-1371.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00471-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57270-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Duffy, S., Simon, S.L. and Whicker, F.W. (1999) 137Cs Contamination of Plants Used for Traditional Medicine and Implication for Human Exposure. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 46, 27-44.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0265-931X(98)00121-0</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57270-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salaman, I. and Haban, M. (2004) The Radioactivity Evaluation of Selected Species of Medicinal Plants. Acta Fytotecnica and Zootecnica, 4,103-106.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57270-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Desideri, D., Meli, M.A. and Roselli, C. (2010) Natural and Artificial Radioactivity Determination of Some Medicinal Plants. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 101, 751-756. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2010.04.018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57270-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">ECLIP 3.3 (2013) Sebastien Laurent Training Session Montigny Office.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57270-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ebaid</surname><given-names> Y.Y. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2010</year>)<article-title>Use of Gamma-Ray Spectrometry for Uranium Isotopic Analysis in Environmental Samples</article-title><source> Romanian Journal of Physics</source><volume> 55</volume>,<fpage> 69</fpage>-<lpage>74</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57270-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">UNSCEAR (2000) Sources and Effects of Ionising Radiation. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57270-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Scheibel, V. and Appoloni, C.R. (2007) Survey of Natural Radioactivity Levels in Ilex Paraguariensis (St. Hil.) by Gamma-Ray Spectrometry. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 50, 901-904.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132007000500019</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>