<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2015.69137</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-57079</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Effects of Inoculation of Rhizobium on Nodulation and Nitrogen Accumulation in Cowpea Subjected to Water Availabilities
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>alomão</surname><given-names>Lima Guimarães</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Edna</surname><given-names>Maria Bonfim-Silva</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Julio</surname><given-names>Cezar Fornazier Moreira</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Christiane</surname><given-names>Kamila Bosa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Samara</surname><given-names>Lorâine Soares da Silva</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Tonny</surname><given-names>José Araújo da Silva</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Agricultural and Environmental Engineering, Institute of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Rondonópolis, Brazil</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>slguimaraes@ufmt.br(ALG)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>05</day><month>06</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>09</issue><fpage>1378</fpage><lpage>1384</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>6</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>8</month>	<year>June</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>11</day>	<month>June</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  With high protein content, the cowpea is one of the most widely consumed legumes in northeastern Brazil. This study was aimed to evaluate the rhizobia inoculation effect on nitrogen accumulation and nodulation in cowpea subjected to water availability. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse, in a completely randomized design, with six water availabilities (40%, 60%, 80%, 100%, 120% and 140% of maximum soil water retention capacity), with four replications. Soil moisture maintenance was performed by gravimetric method. The BR3267 strain (
  &lt;i&gt;Bradyrhizobium japonicum
  &lt;/i&gt;) recommended for cowpea grown in Brazil was used. At thirty-five days after treatments implementation, the nitrogen nutritional status was assessed through SPAD reading, shoot nitrogen concentration and total accumulation. Nodulation was assessed by nodules number and dry matter. The increased water availability provided negative effect on SPAD reading and shoots nitrogen concentration. Shoot nitrogen accumulation was favored to up to 78.8% water availability, with subsequent decline. Nodulation was favored when soil water availability was between 85% and 87%. Water availability affects nodulation and cowpea nutritional status, although negative effects are more pronounced when there is soil water excess.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>&lt;i&gt;Vigna unguiculata&lt;/i&gt;</kwd><kwd> Inoculant</kwd><kwd> Simbiosis</kwd><kwd> Water</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) is a rustic species which is well-adapted to tropical regions climate and soil conditions, having high genetic variability, thus being used in different production systems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57079-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>In Brazil, cowpea bean production is concentrated in the northeastern and northern regions. However, this culture has been cultivated in the midwest region, due to the development of cultivars with features that allow mechanization [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57079-ref2">2</xref>] .</p><p>Nitrogen is one of the nutrients required in highest quantity by cowpea. As for being a legume species, it conducts biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) when associated with nitrogen-fixing bacteria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57079-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>Thus, when effectively nodulated by efficient strains, it can dispense other nitrogen sources, and through FBN, achieve high productivity levels [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57079-ref4">4</xref>] . According to reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57079-ref5">5</xref>] , the inoculation of cowpea plants has shown gains not only in the increase of dry matter, but also in total nitrogen and nodulation, confirming the importance of symbiosis between bacteria and cowpea, thus generating productivity gains. However, nodulation and BNF may be influenced by factors that can maximize or minimize the process including soil water availability.</p><p>Water is the most important factor in crops development and production, since virtually all plant physiological processes are influenced by soil available water amount. Water deficit is one of the most limiting factors for cowpea development [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57079-ref6">6</xref>] . In contrast, soil water excess promotes O<sub>2</sub> deficiency and CO<sub>2</sub>, methane, ethylene and hydrogen sulfide accumulation, thereby reducing aerobic respiration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57079-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>Plant physiological processes are affected under water stress, including absorption and biological nitrogen fixation, causing nodules mass, shoot growth and cowpea crop nitrogen concentration decrease [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57079-ref8">8</xref>] .</p><p>Water importance for plant growth is clear. Thus, this study aimed to assess cowpea plants nodulation and nutritional status under water availabilities.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><p>The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse, in 8 dm<sup>3</sup> pots containing screened dystrophic red Latosol in 4 mm sieve, collected at 0 - 0.20 m depth layer. Soil chemical and physical characterization was conducted in accordance with [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57079-ref9">9</xref>] , giving pH (CaCl<sub>2</sub>): 4.1; P (mg∙dm<sup>−3</sup>) = 2.4; K (mg∙dm<sup>−3</sup>) = 28; Ca (cmol<sub>c</sub>∙dm<sup>−3</sup>) = 0.3; Mg (cmol<sub>c</sub>∙dm<sup>−3</sup>) = 0.2; H (cmol<sub>c</sub>∙dm<sup>−3</sup>) = 4.2; Al (cmol<sub>c</sub>∙dm<sup>−3</sup>) = 1.1; SB (cmol<sub>c</sub>∙dm<sup>−3</sup>) = 0.6; CTC (cmol<sub>c</sub>∙dm<sup>−3</sup>) = 5.9; V (%) = 9.8; Organic matter (g∙dm<sup>−3</sup>) = 22.7; Sand (g∙kg<sup>−1</sup>) = 549; Silt (g∙kg<sup>−1</sup>) = 84; Clay (g∙kg<sup>−1</sup>) = 367.</p><p>Soil correction was performed through base saturation method, raising it to 60% level, with dolomitic limestone incorporation (PRNT = 80.3%). After merging with limestone, soil samples were moistened to field capacity and incubated for 30 days.</p><p>The experimental design was completely randomized, with five water availabilities (40%, 60%, 80%, 100%, 120% and 140% of maximum soil water retention capacity) and four replications.</p><p>Pots maximum soil water retention capacity was maintained by gravimetric method, according to the methodology described by reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57079-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>Phosphorus and potassium basic fertilization was incorporated into the soil at planting. Following soil chemical analysis, 110 mg∙dm<sup>−3</sup> P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> and 50 mg∙dm<sup>−3</sup> K<sub>2</sub>O were applied, using single superphosphate and potassium chloride as sources, respectively.</p><p>Cowpea seeds from BRS Nova Era cultivar were sown in the pots, and thinning was conducted at five days after emergence, leaving three plants per pot, which were grown for 50 days.</p><p>Was used in this study, the BR3267 strain (SEMIA 6462), which received authorization from the Ministry of Agriculture of Brazil for use as inoculant for cowpea [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57079-ref11">11</xref>] . Thus, BR3267 strain was grown on YMA culture medium for 24 hours under constant agitation at 100 rpm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57079-ref12">12</xref>] . Then, 5 mL of the bacterial broth were applied near plant root zone.</p><p>Aiming at plants establishment, all experimental plots were maintained at 80% maximum soil water retention capacity for 15 days after germination. After treatment application and availability stabilization of each treatment, two weightings of each plot were performed daily, in order to replace the water consumed by evapotranspiration, always in the early morning and late afternoon.</p><p>Thirty-five days after treatments implantation, the experiment was harvested. In order to assess nitrogen nutritional status, SPAD reading at harvest and shoot total nitrogen concentration and accumulation were conducted. Shoot nitrogen concentration was performed according to the method described by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57079-ref13">13</xref>] , through dried samples in air circulating oven at 65˚C &#177; 5˚C and grounded in a Wiley mill with a 1 mm diameter sieve. Nodulation was determined through nodules and nodules dry matter counting.</p><p>Results were submitted to analysis of variance and regression test at 5% probability through Sisvar statistical program [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57079-ref14">14</xref>] . Number of nodules and nodules dry matter variables were transformed by (X + 1)<sup>0.5</sup>.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>Soil water availability affected all analyzed variables, confirming that soil water availability interferes with cowpea development.</p><p>SPAD reading is directly related to plant nutritional status assessment, since there is a positive correlation with leaves nitrogen concentration [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57079-ref6">6</xref>] . This was confirmed in this study, where there was positive and significant correlation at 1% significance level, with a correlation factor (r) of 0.62. These results corroborate with those described by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57079-ref15">15</xref>] , who obtained a high correlation (r = 0.91) between SPAD reading and nitrogen concentration of nitrogen in cowpea plant leaves.</p><p>The relation between nitrogen concentration and chlorophyll index was linear and positive (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). This behavior indicates that, as shoot nitrogen concentration increases, SPAD reading rises proportionately. This relation is mainly attributed to the fact that 50% to 70% of leaves total nitrogen leaves are part of enzymes that are associated with chloroplasts [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57079-ref16">16</xref>] . Similar results were described by references [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57079-ref15">15</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57079-ref17">17</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57079-ref18">18</xref>] , while working with cowpea.</p><p>Both SPAD index and shoot nitrogen concentration assessments were adjusted linearly decreasing to the regression model, representing 0.1879 SPAD reading and 0.1012 g∙kg<sup>−1</sup> plant shoot nitrogen decrease to each 1% increase in water availability (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>(b)). This represents a reduction of 31% and 41%, respectively, in the flooded treatment (140% water availability) compared to the water deficit (40%) treatment. Effects found in this study may be related to those that were reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57079-ref19">19</xref>] in a similar study with capim-convert HD364 subjected to water availabilities, where the highest SPAD reading in the lowest study availability (20%) was attributed to the dilution effect, as the highest SPAD reading was obtained in the treatment where the lowest shoot dry matter production occurred.</p><p>During this study conduction, yellowing and subsequent leaf senescence was visually observed in the flooded treatment, justifying the drastic decrease in SPAD reading and total nitrogen concentration by increases in soil water availability. This indicates cowpea susceptibility to flooding. Under these conditions, respiration and plant metabolism are reduced as a result of soil oxygen deficiency, causing symptoms that initially appear as withering and leaf chlorosis, heading to stem hypertrophy, morphological and anatomical changes, reduced growth and roots death [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57079-ref20">20</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57079-ref21">21</xref>] .</p><p>Note that in this study there was no nitrogen application in mineral form, and this nutrient was exclusively provided through soil organic matter mineralization and nitrogen biological fixation, which possibly was the biggest responsible for the crop nitrogen supply, since plants were inoculated with BR3267 strain, suitable for the crop.</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Relationship between shoot nitrogen concentration and SPAD reading of cowpea bean plants subjected to different water availabilities</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2602094x6.png"/></fig><fig-group id="fig2"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> SPAD reading (a) and nitrogen concentration in cowpea plants subjected to water availabilities (b).</title></caption><fig id ="fig2_1"><label>(b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2602094x7.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig2_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2602094x8.png"/></fig></fig-group><p>Considering nitrogen importance in plant development and fertilization absence, the SPAD reading and shoot nitrogen concentration linear reduction may have been a result of water excess in the root system, causing anoxia and/or hypoxia. These conditions are possibly unfavorable to the development of bacteria responsible for biological nitrogen fixation, which are aerobic.</p><p>Besides impairing plants vegetative growth, soil flooding can also reduce nodulation, and consequently, nitrogen symbiotic fixation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57079-ref22">22</xref>] . This reduction has been mainly attributed to root nodules oxygen and N<sub>2</sub> decrease [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57079-ref23">23</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57079-ref24">24</xref>] .</p><p>Under these conditions, nodule production is compromised, as observed in this study, where there was nodules dry matter and production reduction, adjusted to the quadratic regression model. Water availabilities that provided the highest yield and nodules dry matter were of 87.22% and 85.02%, resulting in 145 nodules∙pot<sup>−1</sup> and 0.44 g∙pot<sup>−1</sup>, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b)).</p><p>This decrease in the number of root nodules caused by soil flooding was previously observed in other studies [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57079-ref25">25</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57079-ref27">27</xref>] . According to reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57079-ref20">20</xref>] , soil flooding causes significant reduction in rhizobium infection sites, thereby decreasing formed root nodules amount.</p><p>In a study performed by reference [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57079-ref28">28</xref>] , where Bradyrhizobium strains inoculation was assessed in BRS Guariba cultivar cowpea plants under controlled conditions, using sterilized and with nutritive solution supply sand: vermiculite substrate (2:1, v/v), 220.78 mg∙pot<sup>−1</sup> accumulation was obtained with the BR 3567 strain, a lower result than what was obtained in the this study, where maximum accumulation was of 368.98 mg∙pot<sup>−1</sup> in 78.76% maximum soil water retention capacity water availability (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>). Visually it was observed differences in the color of the leaves as the size of the plants according to water availability (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>).</p><fig-group id="fig3"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Number (a) and mass of nodules (b) of cowpea subjected to different water availabilities.</title></caption><fig id ="fig3_1"><label>(b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2602094x9.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig3_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2602094x10.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Shoot nitrogen accumulation of cowpea subjected to different water availabilities</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2602094x11.png"/></fig><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Growth curve of cowpea inoculated with rhizobia according of water availability soil</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-2602094x12.png"/></fig><p>This suggests that this study conditions enabled a better strain establishment, resulting in higher atmospheric nitrogen fixation, what allowed higher biomass production and this nutrient accumulation.</p><p>Alternatively to mineral fertilization, legumes use as green manure source is an important way to add nitrogen and cycle other soil nutrients, due to absorption and release that occurs in sync with plant needs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57079-ref29">29</xref>] .</p><p>Besides immediately available nitrogen via BNF, legumes use is favored by the low C/N ratio. This is an aspect that, combined with soluble compounds large presence, favors its decomposition and mineralization, what enhances nutrient cycling, allowing residual effect for subsequent crops [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.57079-ref30">30</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>Water availabilities between 85% and 87% favor nodulation.</p><p>Nutritional status, assessed by SPAD reading and cowpea plants nitrogen concentration, is negatively affected by increased soil water availability.</p><p>Nitrogen accumulation and nodulation are increased by increasing soil water availability to the range of 78% - 87%, and soil water excess promotes more significant reductions to these attributes than deficit.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.57079-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Freire Filho, F.R., Lima, J.A.A. and Ribeiro, V.Q. (2005) Feij&amp;atildeo caupi: Avan&amp;ccedilos tecnológicos. Embrapa, Brasília.  
http://www.agencia.cnptia.embrapa.br/Repositorio/cap6_000fm0xytbj02wyiv80kxlb3612vq547.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57079-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Monteiro, F.P.R. (2012) Impacto de herbicidas na nodula&amp;ccedil&amp;atildeo e na produtividade do feij&amp;atildeo caupi. Disserta&amp;ccedil&amp;atildeo em Produ&amp;ccedil&amp;atildeo Vegetal, Universidade Federal do Tocantins, Gurupi.  
http://www.site.uft.edu.br/producaovegetal/dissertacoes/FABIO%20PINTO%20DOS%20REIS%20MONTEIRO.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57079-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wendland, S.B., Portilho, I.I.R., Pierezan, L. and Mercante, F.M. (2010) Avalia&amp;ccedil&amp;atildeo da nodula&amp;ccedil&amp;atildeo e eficiência simbiótica em feij&amp;atildeo caupi inoculado com rizóbios nativos de Mato Grosso do Sul. Cadernos de Agroecologia, 5, 1-5.  
http://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/24203/1/Agroecologia17.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57079-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martins, L.M.V., Xavier, G.R., Rumjanek, N.G., Rangel, F., Ribeiro, J.R.A. and Morgado, L.B. (2003) Contribuition of Biological Nitrogen Fixation to Cowpea: A Strategy for Improving Grain Yield in the Semi-Arid Region of Brazil. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 38, 333-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00374-003-0668-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57079-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zilli, J.E., Neto, M.L.S., Júnior, I.F., Perin, L. and Melo, A.R. (2011) Resposta do feij&amp;atildeo caupi à inocula&amp;ccedil&amp;atildeo com estirpes de Bradyrhizobium recomendadas para a soja. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 35, 739-742.  
http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbcs/v35n3/v35n3a09  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832011000300009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57079-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lima, C.J.G.S., Oliveira, F.A., Medeiros, J.F., Oliveira, M.K.T. and Júnior, A.B.A. (2007) Resposta do feij&amp;atildeo caupi a salinidade da água de irriga&amp;ccedil&amp;atildeo. Revista Verde, 2, 79-86.  
http://www.gvaa.com.br/revista/index.php/RVADS/article/view/49/49</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57079-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pires, J.L., Soprano, E. and Cassol, B. (2002) Adapta&amp;ccedil&amp;otildees morfofisiológicas da soja em solo inundado. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 37, 41-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-204x2002000100006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57079-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Costa, R.C.L., Cardoso, B.B., Silva, J.T., Gomes Filho, J.G.F. and Silveira, J.A.G. (1996) O estresse hídrico diminui intensamente a assimila&amp;ccedil&amp;atildeo do nitrato e a nodula&amp;ccedil&amp;atildeo em feij&amp;atildeo-de-corda (Vigna unguiculata, (L.) Walp.). Reuni&amp;atildeo Nacional de Pesquisa de Caupi, 4, 78-79.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57079-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Claessen, M.E.C. (1997) Manual de métodos de análise de Solo. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Rio de Janeiro. http://www.agencia.cnptia.embrapa.br/Repositorio/Manual+de+Metodos_000fzvhotqk02wx5ok0q43a0ram31wtr.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57079-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bonfim-Silva, E.M., Silva, T.J.A., Cabral, C.E.A., Kroth, B.E. and Rezende, D. (2011) Desenvolvimento inicial de gramíneas submetidas ao estresse hídrico. Revista Caatinga, 24, 180-186.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57079-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rumjanek, N.G., Xavier, G.R., Martins, L.M., Morgado, L.B. and Neves, M.C.P. (2006) Feij&amp;atildeo caupi tem uma nova estirpe de rizóbio, BR3267, recomendada como inoculante. Embrapa Agrobiologia, Seropédica. (Embrapa Agrobiologia. Boletim de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento, 15). 
http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/infoteca/bitstream/doc/629225/1/bot015.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57079-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">D&amp;oumlbereiner, J., Baldani, V.L.D. and Baldani, J.I. (1995) Como isolar e identificar bactérias diazotróficas de plantas n&amp;atildeo-leguminosas. Embrapa-SPI, Brasília.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57079-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Malavolta, E., Vitti, G.C. and Oliveira, S.A. (1997) Avalia&amp;ccedil&amp;atildeo do estado nutricional das plantas: Princípios e aplica&amp;ccedil&amp;otildees. Potafos, Piracicaba. http://www.pldlivros.com.br/MaisProduto.asp?Produto=37</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57079-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ferreira</surname><given-names> D.F. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2011</year>)<article-title>Sisvar: A Computer Statistical Analysis System</article-title><source> Ciência e Agrotecnologia</source><volume> 35</volume>,<fpage> 1039</fpage>-<lpage>1042</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57079-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Morais, R.R., Fontes, J.R.A. and Gon&amp;ccedilalves, J.R.P. (2013) Estimativa dos teores de nutrientes foliares em feij&amp;atildeo caupi utilizando clorofilometro. Embrapa Amazonia Ocidental, Manaus. (Embrapa Amazonia Ocidental. Circular Técnica, 40). http://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/88776/1/Circ-Tec-40.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57079-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chapman, S.C. and Barreto, H.J. (1997) Using a Chlorophyll Meter to Estimate Specific Leaf Nitrogen of Tropical Maize during Vegetative Growth. Agronomy Journal, 89, 557-562. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj1997.00021962008900040004x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57079-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carvalho, M.A.C., Furlani Junior, E., Arf, O., Sá, M.E., Paulino, H.B. and Buzetti, S. (2003) Doses e épocas de aplica&amp;ccedil&amp;atildeo de nitrogênio e teores foliares deste nutriente e de clorofila em feijoeiro. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 27, 445-450. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832003000300006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57079-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sant’ana, E.V.P., Santos, S.B. and Silveira, P.M. (2010) Aduba&amp;ccedil&amp;atildeo nitrogenada na produtividade, leitura SPAD e teor de nitrogênio em folhas de feijoeiro. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical, 40, 491-496. 
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/bitstream/doc/874592/1/6320503921PB1.pdf 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1983-40632010000400012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57079-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bonfim-Silva, E.M., Silva, M.C., Schlichting, A.F., Porto, R.A., Silva, T.J.A. and Koetz, M. (2014) Desenvolvimento e produ&amp;ccedil&amp;atildeo de capim-convert HD364 submetido ao estresse hídrico. Revista Agro@mbiente, 8, 134-141. 
http://revista.ufrr.br/index.php/agroambiente/article/view/1437</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57079-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bradford, K.J. and Yang, S.F. (1981) Physiological Responses of Plants to Waterlogging. HortScience, 16, 25-30.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57079-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kramer, P.J. (1983) Water Relations of Plants. New York Academic Press, New York. 
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/book/9780124250406</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57079-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, F. and Smith, D.L. (2002) Interorganismal Signaling in Suboptimum Environments: The Legume-Rhizobia Symbiosis. Advances in Agronomy, 76, 125-161.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57079-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shiferaw, W., Shelton, H.M. and So, H.B. (1992) Tolerance of Some Subtropical Pasture Legumes to Waterlogging. Tropical Grasslands, 26, 187-195. 
http://www.tropicalgrasslands.asn.au/Tropical%20Grasslands%20Journal%20archive/PDFs/Vol_26_1992/Vol_26_03_92_pp187_195.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57079-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arrese-Igor, C., Royuela, M., Lourenzo, D., Felipe, M.R. and Aparicio-Tejo, P.M. (1993) Effect of Low Rizhosphere Oxygen on Growth Nitrogen Fixation and Nodule Morphology. Physiologia Plantarum, 89, 55-63. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1993.tb01786.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57079-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">James, E.K. and Crawford, R.M.M. (1998) Effect of Oxygen Availability on Nitrogen Fixation by Two Lotus Species under Flooded Conditions. Journal Experimental Botany, 49, 599-609. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/49.320.599</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57079-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vignolio, O.R. and Fernández, O.N. (1999) Flooding Tolerance in Five Populations of Lotus glaber Mill. (Syn. Lotus tenuis Waldst. Et. Kit). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 50, 555-559. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/A98112</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57079-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Scholles, D. and Vargas, L.K. (2004) Viabilidade da inocula&amp;ccedil&amp;atildeo de soja com estirpes de Bradyrhizobium em solo inundado. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 28, 973-979. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832004000600005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57079-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zilli, J.E., Neto, M.L.S., Júnior, I.F., Perin, L. and Melo, A.R. (2011) Resposta do feij&amp;atildeo caupi à inocula&amp;ccedil&amp;atildeo com estirpes de Bradyrhizobium recomendadas para a soja. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 35, 739-742. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832011000300009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57079-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Torres, J.L.R., Pereira, M.G. and Fabian, A.J. (2008) Produ&amp;ccedil&amp;atildeo de fitomassa por plantas de cobertura e mineraliza&amp;ccedil&amp;atildeo de seus resíduos em plantio direto. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 3, 421-428. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2008000300018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.57079-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Silva, E.C., Muraoka, T., Buzetti, S., Veloso, M.E.C. and Trivelin, P.C.O. (2006) Absor&amp;ccedil&amp;atildeo de nitrogênio nativo do solo pelo milho sob plantio direto em sucess&amp;atildeo a plantas de cobertura. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 30, 723-732. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832006000400013</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>