The materials such as zinc acetate and sodium selenite used for the preparation of ZnSe nanopowder are Merck GR grade of purity ≥ 98% purity. Zinc acetate of 4.388 g was dissolved in 100 ml of direct Millipore water and 0.519 g of sodium selenite (Na₂SeO₃) was dissolved in 30 ml of hydrazine hydrate (N₂H₄∙H₂O). Both the prepared solutions were mixed up under vigourous stirring with external heat energy. Then these solutions were transferred into teflon lined sealed stainless steel autoclave and heated at 240˚C for 5 hrs in a muffle furnace. It was washed two times using Millipore water for removing impurities. In essence, stringent symmetry of nanoparticles can be controlled by chemical concentration, reaction temperature and kinetic control.

Ethylene Vinyl Acetate (EVA), copolymer used for the experiment was obtained from Exxon Mobil Chemicals, Singapore. The vinyl acetate content of the copolymer used was 9.4 wt% (Density- 0.931 g/cm³, Melt Flow Index- 2.1 g/10 min @190˚C, 2.16 kg). The copolymer was first dissolved in toluene. Then synthesized ZnSe nanoparticles were dispersed in a sonication bath for 2 hours on the basis of the desired weight fraction (2% and 4%) of ZnSe nanoparticle at room temperature. In order to make the resultant neat nanoparticles filled polymer samples, it was transfered to a teflon coated glass mould and spread with uniform thickness. Afterward, the mixture was heated at 40˚C for 18 hours in an air oven to evaporate the solvent completely and finally, a thin film of pure and ZnSe/EVA nanocomposites formed.

ZnSe nanoparticles were analyzed using Hitachi H7500 TEM where the sample is irradiated with an electron beam of uniform current density with the electron energy of 100 keV. The Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra of the samples have been carried out in the wave number range 400 - 4000 cm⁻¹ using a Thermo Nicolet Make Avatar 370 FTIR Spectrometer and for signal detection, DTGS detector is used. The refractive indices of the samples were determined using HIOKI 3532 - 50 LCR IMPEDANCE ANALYZER and program version 4.03E was used to record the refractive indices of the samples by varying the frequencies from 100 Hz to 5 MHz. VARIAN CARY 5000 spectrophotometer is used to determine the optical absorption spectrum of the samples and recorded in the region of 200 to 2000 nm. The TGA and DTA analyses of ZnSe/EVA were carried out between 28 and 1300˚C at a heating rate of 20 K/min using the instrument NETSZCH STA 409C. The tensile properties of the virgin EVA and EVA nanocomposites were measured by an Instron 3366 universal testing machine according to ASTM D882. Peel strength was performed using an Instron tensile testing machine at a peel speed of 50 mm/min. Peel test with 180˚ stripping was carried out as per ASTM D 1876. Peel test involves stripping away of substrate joined by the adhesive. The substrates (glass paper, cotton and polyester) were flexible enough to permit a 180˚ turn near the point of loading. Peel strength values are recorded in Newton per millimeter (N/mm) of width of the bonded specimen.

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) is a vital characterization tool for directly imaging nanomaterials to obtain quantitative measures of grain size, size distribution, and morphology. TEM of ZnSe nanoparticles are shown in Figure 1. The image reveals that the shape of the particles is spherical and the average size of particles is about 80 nm. The dark images show that nanoparticles are solid in structure.

The FTIR spectra of the ZnSe/EVA nanocomposites are shown in Figure 2. The comparison of pristine, 2% and 4% ZnSe has been compared and the polymetric group identification with the effect of ZnSe in EVA could be established. The peaks due to the adsorbed acetate species cannot be clearly distinguished in the ZnSe/EVA spectra. This could be due to the presence of the EVA matrix in which the ZnSe nanopaiticles are dispersed. The peak at 1121.91 cm⁻¹ observed on 4% ZnSe/EVA corresponds to the C-O group carboxylic derivates may be due to residue of Zinc acetate used in the reaction. The peak at 608 cm⁻¹ represents the out of plane bending of C-H alkenes and the peak at 3434.72 cm⁻¹ is the characteristics absorption peak of ZnSe, authenticates that the preparation technique is faithful. The stretching vibrations of C-H alkanes are contributed the transmittance peaks at 2920 cm⁻¹ and 2850.28 cm⁻¹. The changes in the relative intensities of the bands in the region 1464 cm⁻¹, 1427 cm⁻¹ and 1121 cm⁻¹ in composite can be due to the presence of absorbed species on the surface of the ZnSe nanoparticles.

The refractive index of EVA/ZnSe has been determined using the measurement of dielectric constant with the help of LCR Impedance analyzer, by Maxwell’s rule [16] [17] .

where ε_r is the relative permittivity and µ_r is the relative permeability. µ_r is 1 for non-magnetic materials. The dielectric constant of the sample is calculated using the relation

?sub>r = Cd/?sub>0A; where the nanocomposite acts as a dielectric with ?sub>0 the absolute permittivity, C is the capacitance, d is the thickness and A is the area (mm²) of the ZnSe/EVA composite. It is reported that EVA posses almost unchangeable index of refraction in entire electromagnetic region. In this study, we investigated the

variation refractive index by varying frequency from 100 Hz to 1 MHz. The results of the variation of refractive index as a function of frequency for samples of different ZnSe nanoparticle concentration dispersed in EVA polymer matrix are shown in Figure 3. It is observed that the index value of pure EVA is 1.52 at room temperature and it increased to 2.28 as the concentration of ZnSe becomes 4%. Commonly, the micro-structured coating of EVA and ZnSe/EVA nanocomposites allow a rough approximation for uniform index value in entire varied frequency region except for very low frequencies. It showed the value of index could go up to 5.7 below 500Hz. Figure 4 shows variation of refractive index with temperature. We examined the results using 4% ZnSe/EVA nanocomposite and showed that there should be a slight decrement in these values by increasing temperature. The calculations are carried out from room temperature to 353K and sample possessed reproducibility.

In short, the average index profiles samples could be controlled from 1.52 to 2.28 by homogeneous dispersion of ZnSe nanoparticle in threshold concentration. The index difference of about 0.8 could be achieved easily from pristine matrix. By the inclusion of composites with different refractive indices, multi-layer anti-reflective coating and photovoltaic modules can be effectively modeled.

The UV-Vis-NIR spectra of the ZnSe/EVA nanocomposites are recorded in the region 200 to 2000 nm are sho- wn in Figure 5. The bandgap of the prepared nanocomposites has been determined using the Tauc-relation [18]

where hν is the photon energy, α is the absorption co-efficient, Eg is the band gap, A is a constant and n = 1 for the direct band gap [19] . For allowed direct transition, a graph between (αhν)² and hν is plotted, extrapolation of the straight line to (αhν)² = 0 axis gives the value of the band gap. It is shown in Figure 6. The estimated band gap of pure EVA and 2% and 4% ZnSe nanoparticles dispersed in EVA host matrix is found to be around 4.74 eV, 4.44 eV and 4.08 eV respectively. The band gap of the prepared composites showed a marked decrement when the percentage of nanoparticles is increased.

EVA undergoes both physical and chemical changes while heating so that a clear distinctive thermal analysis is

needed. The Thermogravimetric (TG) and Differential Thermal Analysis (DTA) on pure and composite EVA polymer are carried out between room temperature to 500˚C. The TG-DTA traces of pure and doped samples are shown in Figures 7(a)-(c). It seemed nearly same behaviour for three samples with two steps decomposition between 290˚C to 500˚C. It is clear that the Pure EVA is thermally stable up to 298˚C whereas 2% ZnSe and 4% ZnSe doped EVA is stable upto 309˚C and 315˚C respectively. Thus the thermal stability of the EVA nanocomposite increased with increasing the filler concentrations. 28.5% of weight lost in the first stage decomposition of Pure EVA, but once can easily found from the thermogram that the weight loss in the first stage decomposition decreases as filler concentration increases and found to be 17.3% and 14.2% for 2% and 4% ZnSe/EVA respectively.

The virgin EVA samples showed tensile strength in the range of 29 - 31 MPa, with 430% elongation. The effect of nano ZnSe on tensile strength and elongation at break is shown in Figure 8. The 2% addition of ZnSe nanoparticle found to reduce the tensile properties of the composite compared to the virgin compound. The reduction of tensile strength at higher ratio of nano loading was due to the stress concentration at the interface ZnSe particles agglomerates. As the loading level increases the effect of dispersion and distribution of nanomaterials gets reduced. Percentage stretch possible with the nanocomposite samples reduces with ZnSe loading. This phenomenon is already reported with polymer based nanocomposites as the matrix molecular orientation is negatively affected with the reinforcement particles [20] .

The peel strength increases for EVA-ZnSe composites on all substrates on 2% incorporation. The adhesion properties differs, based on the molecular interactions of the adhesive with the adherent. Figure 9 shows peel strength of the nanocomposite with different ratios of ZnSe. It is observed that the molecular flexibility of EVA is not affected by 2% of ZnSe on all substrates. The improvement in cohesive strength resulting from the presence of ZnSe might be responsible for the improvement in peel strength. The lack of distribution with increased amount of nano particles might be the underlying reason for the drastic reduction of peel strength at 4% loading. It can also be inferred that there is a maximum ratio (2%) for ZnSe, above which the inherent polymer property is adversely affected.