<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JSIP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Signal and Information Processing</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2159-4465</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jsip.2015.62017</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JSIP-56749</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Sharp Operator Based Edge Detection
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ohammad</surname><given-names>Kalimuddin Ahmad</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Stephan</surname><given-names>Didas</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alemdar</surname><given-names>Hasanov</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Javid</surname><given-names>Iqbal</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Department of Mathematics, Baba Ghulam Shah Badshah University, Rajouri, India</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Hochschule Trier, Umwelt-Campus Birkenfeld, Fachbereich Umweltplanung/Umwelttechnik, Postfach 1380, 
Birkenfeld, Germany</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Mathematics, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Izmir University, Izmir, Turkey</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>ahmad_kalimuddin@yahoo.co.in(OKA)</email>;<email>s.didas@umwelt-campus.de(SD)</email>;<email>alemdar.hasanoglu@izmir.edu.tr(AH)</email>;<email>javid2iqbal@yahoo.co.in(JI)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>27</day><month>03</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>180</fpage><lpage>189</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>3</day>	<month>October</month>	<year>2014</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>24</month>	<year>May</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>28</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Ahmad et al. in their paper [1] for the first time proposed to apply sharp function for classification of images. In continuation of their work, in this paper we investigate the use of sharp function as an edge detector through well known diffusion models. Further, we discuss the formulation of weak solution of nonlinear diffusion equation and prove uniqueness of weak solution of nonlinear problem. The anisotropic generalization of sharp operator based diffusion has also been implemented and tested on various types of images.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Maximal Function</kwd><kwd> Sharp Function</kwd><kwd> Image Processing</kwd><kwd> Edge Detection</kwd><kwd> Nonlinear Diffusion</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Nonlinear diffusion filtering is a well-established tool for image denoising and simplification. Starting with the pioneering work by Perona and Malik [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref2">2</xref>] in 1990, it has attracted the attention of many researchers working in the domain of mathematics and image processing (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref3">3</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref9">9</xref>] , for example). This filter class makes it possible to smooth images while the edges as main source of information are preserved. This leads to an adaptive sim- plification that can be useful for image understanding and interpretation. Among the most effective extensions of the basic method are the anisotropic filters [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref8">8</xref>] that offer the possibility to remove noise and enhance flow- like structures.</p><p>The sharp function, on the other hand, is a well-known functional analytic concept to measure the oscillatory behaviour of functions. It goes back to the maximal function which was introduced by Hardy and Littlewood [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref10">10</xref>] in 1930 to solve a problem in the theory of functions of complex variables. Based on this idea, John and Nirenberg [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref11">11</xref>] introduced the concept of bounded mean oscillation (BMO) functions. In 1972, Fefferman and Stein [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref12">12</xref>] introduced the sharp function (denoted by<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) and found that a function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> was equivalent with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The theory of Hardy Spaces received impetus from the work of Fefferman and Stein.</p><p>The idea of applying the sharp operator to measure the oscillation and classification of images was first proposed by Ahmad and Siddiqi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref1">1</xref>] where it was used to find a suitable compression technique.</p><p>In this paper, we propose an alternative way to steer nonlinear diffusion filters via the sharp operator without using derivatives to measure edges. We show that the results of these diffusion filters are comparable to classical versions while the underlying sharp operator has a rich theoretical background. Motivated by the available diffusion processes in image processing, we propose an extension of the sharp operator for measuring aniso- tropic structures. To use this to steer anisotropic diffusion processes, we show how a fast variant of it can be implemented and used in practice.</p><p>The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 gives a review of classical nonlinear diffusion filters for image processing. In Section 3, we shortly describe the aspects of the theory for the maximal function, bounded mean oscillation functions, and the sharp function, which are necessary for this paper. The main idea of this paper, namely, the use of the sharp operator in nonlinear diffusion filters and its generalization to the anisotropic setting, is presented in Section 4. To evaluate the methods in practice, Section 6 describes some computational experiments. A summary and an outlook conclude the paper in Section 7.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Classical Nonlinear Diffusion Filters</title><p>Diffusion is interesting as image processing tool since it is a physical process that equilibrates concentration without creating or destroying mass. The idea behind the use of the diffusion equation in image processing arose from the use of Gaussian filter in multiscale image analysis. It can be founded by a system of several axioms like linearity, translational and rotational invariance, and average grey value preservation, that marks the begin- ning of the scale-space concept [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref13">13</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref16">16</xref>] . Convolving an image with a Gaussian filter<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula814"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x9.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with standard deviation<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, is equivalent to the solution of the linear homogeneous diffusion equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula815"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x11.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the given image f is used as initial condition<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. We assume homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where n denotes the outer normal of the boundary of image domain<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The stopping time t has to be chosen as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for equivalence.</p><p>Isotropic nonlinear diffusion. The major drawback of linear diffusion is the delocalisation and blurring of image edges. To circumvent this problem, Perona and Malik [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref2">2</xref>] introduced the nonlinear diffusion equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula816"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x16.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The diffusivity g is chosen as a decreasing function of the edge detector<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Examples for diffusivity functions can be found in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref17">17</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref19">19</xref>] . Catt&#233; et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref3">3</xref>] introduced a regularisation of the gradient of u to make the process well-posed. They use the equation</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula817"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x18.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> A review of this filter class can be found in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref20">20</xref>] .</p><p>Anisotropic nonlinear diffusion. Nonlinear isotropic diffusion often shows problems to remove noise close to image edges. It can be helpful to use an anisotropic diffusion filter</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula818"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x20.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>in such cases as proposed by Weickert [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref8">8</xref>] . The scalar diffusivity function g has been replaced by a matrix <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> here. Depending on the choice of D this allows for smoothing along edges while smoothing across edges is avoided: the so-called edge-enhancing diffusion (EED). Another classical choice of D, depending on the struc- ture tensor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref21">21</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref22">22</xref>] , makes enhancement of coherent flow-like structures possible. This process is known as coherence-enhancing diffusion (CED). Details on these filters and their numerical implementation can be found in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref23">23</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. The Sharp Operator</title><p>In this section, we give a short introduction to the sharp operator and its background. There is a rich theory behind it, and we point out the main results connected to it.</p><p>The Hardy-Littlewood maximal function was developed to solve a problem in the theory of functions of complex variable. The analogue for integrals, which is required for the function theoretic applications, is derived in Hardy and Littlewood [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>Definition 1. Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be the n-dimensional Euclidean space and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be a real valued measurable function on<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. For such a function f on <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x25.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> its Hardy-Littlewood maximal function is defined by the formula</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula819"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x26.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the supremum ranges over all finite cubes Q in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the Lebesgue measure of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Now we state a Hardy-Littlewood maximal theorem.</p><p>Theorem 1. For each function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula820"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x31.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. See ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref24">24</xref>] , p. 142).</p><p>The space BMO, i.e. bounded mean oscillation of functions is introduced by John and Nirenberg [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>Definition 2. A measurable function f on <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> has bounded p-mean oscillation, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x32.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, if</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula821"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x34.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the supremum ranges over all finite cubes Q in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula822"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x36.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is the mean value of the function f on the cube Q.</p><p>Fefferman and Stein [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref12">12</xref>] introduced the “sharp function” <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>that mediates between <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> spaces. It is defined as follows.</p><p>Definition 3. Let f be a locally integrable function on<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The sharp function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is represented by the formula,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula823"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x42.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Of course, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is identical with<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. It is also observed that there are unbounded functions in<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Example 1. The function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is in<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>After calculation it comes out to be <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> So, the un-bounded function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is in<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>It is important to note that it does not matter in which <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> norm we measure the oscillation. This is clear from the following corollary.</p><p>Corollary 1. For each p, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, there exists a constant <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that for each <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula824"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x56.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Proof. See ( [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref24">24</xref>] , p. 156).</p><p>In view of the above corollary the spaces <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are equivalent for all p,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Nonlinear Diffusion with the Sharp Operator</title><p>It is clear from the definition of the sharp function that for a pixel z, where f has almost uniform grey level region in an image, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>will be of very small value. However, for the contrast region we get large values for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The idea is to accrue more diffusion in the regions of lower oscillation whereas to preserve the regions of higher oscillation.</p><p>Many isotropic nonlinear diffusivity models in physics and mechanics are governed by the nonlinear parabolic equation<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where the diffusion coefficient<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, satisfying the condition</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula825"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x67.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>depends on the gradient of the function<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. In the diffusivity model given in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref2">2</xref>] , the choice of the diffusivity coefficient <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is restricted to a subclass of the smooth monotonically decreasing functions with</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Further analysis of the nonlinear diffusivity model for the 1D diffusion equation <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> has been developed in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref5">5</xref>] . In particular, rewriting this equation in the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula826"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x72.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, Equation (8) is defined to be forward parabolic, when<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and</p><p>backward parabolic one, when<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The assumption <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in the Perona-Malik diffusivity 1D model, leads to the following condition with respect to the diffusion coefficient<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula827"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x79.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>First of all let us prove that if only the conditions (i)-(ii) hold, then the nonlinear diffusion operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a monotone potential. For this, we define the nonlinear operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x80.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x81.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula828"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x82.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>in an appropriate Banach space<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x83.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Introduce the functional</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula829"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x84.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Calculating the first derivative</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula830"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x85.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>we conclude that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, and hence the above defined functional <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x87.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the potential of the nonlinear diffusion operator A. Further calculating the second Gateaux derivative</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula831"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x88.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and then substituting here<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x89.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we conclude that the second Gateaux derivative of the potential is positive, i.e.,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula832"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x90.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>if conditions (i)-(ii) hold. This means that the potential <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x91.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of the nonlinear diffusion operator is a convex functional which implies the strong monotonicity of the nonlinear operator [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref25">25</xref>] <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x91.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, i.e.,<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x91.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x92.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x93.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Thus for the strong monotonicity of the nonlinear diffusion Equation (8), and hence solvability of an initial</p><p>boundary value problem related to the nonlinear diffusion equation<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x94.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, only the conditions (i)-(ii)</p><p>are sufficient. However, these conditions are not sufficient for solvability of the corresponding problem related to the 2D diffusivity model. Specifically, one needs to impose the monotonicity condition:<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, as the theorem shows below. This condition and the above two conditions compose the set of admissible coefficients <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> satisfying the following conditions:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula833"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x97.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>An analysis of the steady state diffusivity model governed by the nonlinear elliptic equation <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x98.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x99.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> has been given in Hasanov et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref26">26</xref>] . Based on the results given here let us analyze now the 2D diffusivity (Perona-Malik) model</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula834"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x100.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Here <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x101.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the domain with the piecewise smooth boundary<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x101.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x101.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, n is the unit outward normal to the boundary<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x101.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The negative sign in the Neumann condition <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x101.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x102.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>means that the diffusion flux<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, across the part <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of the boundary<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, passes from a region of high concentration to one of low concentration.</p><p>We will use weak solution theory for nonlinear PDE. For this, let us introduce the following well-known notations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref25">25</xref>] . Let</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x109.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and</p><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Here <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x111.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x113.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are the Sobolev spaces with the norms</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula835"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x114.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>respectively.</p><p>Evidently, the norms <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are equivalent due to the homogeneous Dirichlet condition in (10). Identifying the Hilbert space H with its dual we have the triple <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x117.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with dense continuous compact</p><p>embedding. To define the weak solution of the nonlinear problem (10), we also need the following spaces<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x120.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where the time derivative needs to be understood in sense of distributions. Evidently, W is the separable reflexive Banach space with the norm defined to be as</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Moreover, it is well-known that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the embedding <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x121.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x122.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x123.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is</p><p>continuous and the embedding <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x124.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is compact. For the convenience we denote the duality in the Banach</p><p>space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (with its dual<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x126.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>) and the norm as follows: <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x126.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x127.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x125.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x126.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x127.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x128.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, accordingly.</p><p>Now we define the operators,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula836"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x129.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>It is known that the operator<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x130.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, with the domain<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x130.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x131.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, is a maximal monotone operator (see, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref25">25</xref>] , Proposition 32.10, p. 855).</p><p>For a given coefficient <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x132.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we define the nonlinear operator <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x132.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x133.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> by the nonlinear functional</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula837"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x134.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and the linear functional</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula838"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x135.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>which is well defined for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x136.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Within these definitions the weak solution of the nonlinear problem (10) can be defined as follows: find a function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x136.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x137.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> such that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula839"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x138.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Theorem 2. Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x139.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> be the set of admissible coefficients satisfying conditions (9) and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x139.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Assume that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x139.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x141.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x139.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x141.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Then the nonlinear problem (8) has a unique solution <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x139.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x140.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x141.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x142.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x143.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> defined by (13).</p><p>Proof. Let us introduce the functional</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula840"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x144.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and calculate the first Gateaux derivative. We have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula841"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x145.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Hence<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x146.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, as (12) shows. Thus the above defined functional <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x146.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x147.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the potential of</p><p>the nonlinear diffusion operator A. Calculating the second Gateaux derivative <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x148.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and then substituting here <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x148.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x149.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we obtain:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula842"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x150.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Since<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x151.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x151.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x152.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we conclude</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula843"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x153.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting this in (14) and using the condition (ii) of (9), we conclude</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula844"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x154.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus the potential <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x155.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of the nonlinear diffusion operator A is a convex functional which implies the strong monotonicity of this operator. Hence <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x155.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x156.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is also the strong monotone the operator:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula845"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x157.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This implies the uniqueness of the weak solution of the nonlinear problem (13). Existence of the solution follows from the results given in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref27">27</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref28">28</xref>] .</p><p>Remark 1. The assertion of the above theorem holds also for the case when<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x158.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Since structures in images often have the highly anisotropic features, for example, lines or corners, we propose some generalization of the presented method to the anisotropic setting. We start with an anisotropic generalization of the sharp operator.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Anisotropic Sharp Operator</title><p>So far we have only used isotropic nonlinear diffusion filters. In the definition (7) of the sharp operator, all integration domains Q are cubes. Therefore, the sharp function only provides information about local variations of the function, but not about the direction of these local variations. In order to allow for a quantitative descrip- tion of local variations in a certain direction, we propose to use non-symmetric sets instead of cubes. With this concept, an anisotropic extension of the sharp function can be defined as follows:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula846"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x159.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The most important in this definition is the set<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x160.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. We propose to use ellipses to measure the variation in several directions. So, one could alternatively define</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula847"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x161.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In this definition, we take the supremum over all angles<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x162.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Therefore, with this measure one is not only be able to find out the direction of the variation, but can also find the largest variation in any existing direction. For our later experiments, we start with the model (15) since we want to find the angle of the largest variation in an image.</p><sec id="s5_1"><title>5.1. Modifications of This Basic Model</title><p>For practical calculations, depending on the number of directions <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x163.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> used, this measure is computationally very expensive. Thus we propose two simplifications in order to keep the motivation of the sharp operator while obtaining a fast measure of local variations.</p><p>Analogously to definition (7), the value <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x164.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is defined as the local mean value of f inside the integration domain<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x164.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x165.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, i.e.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula848"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x166.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Instead of taking this mean value as function of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x167.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we use a pre-smoothed version of the function f:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula849"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x168.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This changes the definition (15) to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula850"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x169.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We notice that in this definition, the difference in the integral is a difference between two functions. This offers the possibility to calculate the second function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x170.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in one step for the whole domain instead of calculating mean values for each set <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x170.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x171.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> independently. We notice that with this change, we do not use the same set <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x170.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x171.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x172.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for both integrations.</p><p>The second step is now to write this as a convolution. Instead of an elliptical set<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x173.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we prefer to use an anisotropic Gaussian kernel here and write:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula851"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x174.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>And lastly we replace also the outer integral with a convolution with an anisotropic Gaussian,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula852"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x175.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>This measure can be evaluated in a very efficient way using the methods of Geusebroek et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref29">29</xref>] for fast anisotropic Gaussian convolution. This makes it possible to incorporate it in an image processing tool as described in the following section.</p></sec><sec id="s5_2"><title>5.2. Anisotropic Diffusion with the Fast Sharp Operator</title><p>Now we want to use the anisotropic variant of the sharp operator to steer an anisotropic diffusion process</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula853"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x176.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>as it has been proposed by Weickert [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref8">8</xref>] . In order to use this concepts for anisotropic diffusion in this formula- tion, we have to define a diffusion tensor based on the anisotropic sharp operator to obtain a process of the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula854"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x177.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We define the diffusion tensor as follows: Let a point <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x178.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in the image domain be given, then we search for the direction</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula855"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x179.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the absolute value of the anisotropic sharp operator is maximal. The eigenvectors of the diffusion tensor are then the unit vectors pointing in this direction and the orthogonal one, i.e.,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula856"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x180.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The eigenvalues are defined analogously as for edge-enhancing diffusion:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula857"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x181.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56749-formula858"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x182.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>is the maximal sharp value in the point x.</p><p>Having these definitions for the diffusion tensor at hand, we can use classical discretisation for anisotropic diffusion filters as described in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56749-ref8">8</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Computational Experiments</title><p>To compare the sharp operator based diffusion approach with classical derivative based methods, we show filtering examples in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>.</p><p>It is clear that the parameters of the anisotropic diffusion process have to be specified in practical situations. The time t is an inherent parameter in each diffusion process that controls the amount of simplification applied</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Comparison between classical and sharp operator based anisotropic diffusion. First row: Noisy input images; Second row: Classical edge-en- hancing diffusion (EED); Third row: Sharp operator based diffusion</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x183.png"/></fig><p>to the data. The variance of evolving image decreases monotonically to zero in time. The contrast parameter <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/13-3400374x184.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> allows to steer the edge preservation properties by distinguishing between important edges that should be preserved and smaller edges that are removed. For our discrete sharp operator, there are number of directions as an artificial parameter.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>7. Summary and Outlook</title><p>We have investigated the use of the sharp operator for image processing applications. We have used the sharp operator to steer diffusion filters. With the classical notion, it is suitable to be used inside the diffusivity of a Perona-Malik filter. For anisotropic filters, we have used fast anisotropic Gauss filters to extend the sharp operator to a fast directional-dependent measure of variation. With the help of this measure, we could construct an alternative diffusion tensor for an anisotropic diffusion process. The results are quite similar to classical anisotropic diffusion filters. We have seen that the sharp operator not only is of theoretical interest but also may be used in practical applications.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.56749-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ahmad, M.K. and Siddiqi, A.H. (2002) Image Classification and Comparative Study of Compression Techniques. Sampling Theory in Signal and Image Processing, 1, 155-180.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56749-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Perona, P. and Malik, J. (1990) Scale Space and Edge Detection Using Anisotropic Diffusion. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 12, 629-639.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56749-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Catt′e, P., Lions, P.-L., Morel, J.-M. and Coll, T. (1992) Image Selective Smoothing and Edge Detection by Nonlinear Diffusion. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 29, 182-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/0729012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56749-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Didas, S., Weickert, J. and Burgeth, B. (2009) Properties of Higher Order Nonlinear Diffusion Filtering. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 35, 208-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10851-009-0166-x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56749-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kichenassamy, S. (1997) The Perona-Malik Paradox. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 57, 1328-1342.http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/S003613999529558X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56749-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lysaker, M., Lundervold, A. and Tai, X.-C. (2003) Noise Removal Using Fourth-Order Partial Differential Equation with Applications to Medical Magnetic Resonance Images in Space and Time. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 12, 1579-1590.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56749-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mr′azek, P. and Weickert, J. (2007) From Two-Dimensional Nonlinear Diffusion to Coupled Haar Wavelet Shrinkage. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 18, 162-175.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvcir.2007.01.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56749-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Weickert, J. (1998) Anisotropic Diffusion in Image Processing. B. G. Teubner, Stuttgart.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56749-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Weickert, J., ter Haar Romeny, B.M. and Viergever, M.A. (1998) Efficient and Reliable Schemes for Nonlinear Diffusion Filtering. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 7, 398-410.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56749-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hardy, G.H. and Littlewood, J.E. (1930) A Maximal Theory with Function-Theoretic Applications. Acta Mathematica, 54, 81-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02547518</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56749-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">John, F. and Nirenberg, L. (1961) On Functions of Bounded Mean Oscillation. Communications of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 14, 415-426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160140317</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56749-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Feffermann, C. and Stein, M. (1972) Hp Spaces of Several Variables. Acta Mathematica, 129, 137-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02392215</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56749-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Iijima, T. (1963) Theory of Pattern Recognition. Electronics and Communications in Japan, November 1963, 123-134.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56749-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lindeberg, T. (1990) Scale-Space for Discrete Signals. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 12, 234-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/34.49051</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56749-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lindeberg, T. (1994) Scale-Space Theory in Computer Vision. Kluwer, Boston. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-6465-9</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56749-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Witkin, A.P. (1983) Scale-Space Filtering. Proceedings of the 8th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Karlsruhe, August 1983, 945-951.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56749-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Andreu, F., Ballester, C., Caselles, V. and Maz’on, J.M. (2001) Minimizing Total Variation Flow. Differential and Integral Equations, 14, 321-360.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56749-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Charbonnier, P., Blanc-Feraud, L., Aubert, G. and Barlaud, M. (1997) Deterministic Edge-Preserving Regularization in Computed Imaging. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 6, 298-311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/83.551699</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56749-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Keeling, S.L. and Stollberger, R. (2002) Nonlinear Anisotropic Diffusion Filtering for Multiscale Edge Enhancement. Inverse Problems, 18, 175-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/18/1/312</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56749-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Weickert, J. (1997) A Review of Nonlinear Diffusion Filtering. In: ter Haar Romeny, B., Florack, L., Koenderink, J. and Viergever, M., Eds., Scale-Space Theory in Computer Vision, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1252, Springer, Berlin, 3-28.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56749-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Forstner, M.A. and Gulch, E. (1987) A Fast Operator for Detection and Precise Location of Distinct Points, Corners and Centers of Circular Features. Proceedings of the ISPRS Intercommission Confe-rence on Fast Processing of Phonogrammic Data, Interlaken, 2-4 June 1987, 281-305.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56749-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Knutsson, H. (1989) Representing Local Structure Using Tensors. 6th Scandinavian Conference on Image Analysis, Oulu, June 1989, 244-251.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56749-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Welk, M., Steidl, G. and Weickert, J. (2008) Locally Analytic Schemes: A Link between Diffusion Filtering and Wavelet Shrinkage. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 24, 195-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acha.2007.05.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56749-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wojtaszczyk, P. (1997) A Mathematical Introduction to Wavelets. Cambridge University Press, Ca-mbridge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56749-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zeidler, E. (1990) Nonlinear Functional Analysis and Its Applications II A/B. Springer, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56749-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hasanov, A. and Erdem, A. (2008) Determination of Unknown Coefficient in a Non-Linear Elliptic Problem Related to the Elastoplastic Torsion of a Bar. IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics, 73, 579-591. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/imamat/hxm056</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56749-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, Z. (1999) On the Solvability of Degenerate Quasilinear Parabolic Equations of Second Order. Acta Mathematica Sinica, 16, 313-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s101140000052</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56749-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ou, Y.H., Hasanov, A. and Liu, Z. (2008) An Inverse Coefficient Problems for Nonlinear Parabolic Differential Equations. Acta Mathematica Sinica, 24, 1617-1624.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56749-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Geusebroek, J.M., Smeulders, A.W.M. and van de Weijer, J. (2003) Fast Anisotropic Gauss Filtering. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 12, 938-943. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2003.812429</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>