<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">FNS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Food and Nutrition Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2157-944X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/fns.2015.67069</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">FNS-56442</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Gluten-Free Flat Bread and Biscuits Production by Cassava, Extruded Soy Protein and Pumpkin Powder
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ona</surname><given-names>M. A. Aly</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hinar</surname><given-names>A. Seleem</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Crops Technology Research, Food Technology Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>hanhona853@hotmail.com(HAS)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>05</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>07</issue><fpage>660</fpage><lpage>674</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>4</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>17</month>	<year>May</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>20</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  In recent years, there has been an increase in demand of gluten free products that are suitable for people with celiac disease. The present study was carried out to produce gluten free flat bread and biscuits with good quality. The ingredients under this study were cassava flour, rice flour, extruded soy protein (ESP) and pumpkin powder. Four levels of ESP were used for production of flat bread and biscuits: 2.5%, 5%, 7.5% and 10% for flat bread and 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% levels for biscuits. Results of flat bread samples showed that protein, fat, ash and fiber contents increased in all samples as increasing the level of ESP. Flat bread at level 10% ESP had the highest value of 
  <em>β</em>-carotene. Alkaline water retention capacity (AWRC) at zero time and 24 h of flat bread storage had high values for levels 2.5% and 5% ESP. Water holding capacity (WHC) increased insignificantly by increasing the level of ESP. Color measurements revealed that the lightness decreased and the redness increased with increasing the level of ESP. Sensory evaluation of flat bread revealed that 2.5% followed by 5% ESP level had high score of overall acceptability. Physical properties of biscuits indicated that as the level of ESP increased the diameter, thickness, volume and specific volume decreased. Biscuits sample with 20% ESP had the highest values of protein, fat, ash and fiber but the lowest in total carbohydrates. Also 
  <em>β</em>-carotene and vitamin A content increased in biscuit samples. Caloric values of biscuits in all treated samples were lower than control. Lightness decreased while redness increased with increasing the level of ESP. Data of texture profile analysis (TPA) showed that hardness and adhesiveness (g) increased as ESP level increased. Sensory evaluation of biscuits showed that addition of ESP at 20% level decreased significantly texture score from 9.51 to 6.61 (P &lt; 0.05) but insignificantly affected the other sensory scores.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Celiac Disease</kwd><kwd> Rice Flour</kwd><kwd> Cassava Flour</kwd><kwd> Extruded Soy Protein</kwd><kwd> Pumpkin Powder</kwd><kwd> β-Carotene</kwd><kwd> Color</kwd><kwd> Texture Profile Analysis</kwd><kwd> Flat Bread</kwd><kwd> Biscuits</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Celiac disease (CD) is an autoimmune and chronic disorder in which the mucous membrane of the small intestine is damaged in gluten-intolerant individuals. CD is caused by not only a reaction to gliadin in wheat prolamin but also high molecular glutenin and subunits of gluten protein consequents in damage and inflammation to the small intestine and causes malnutrition [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref1">1</xref>] . One person out of two hundred has been diagnosed with this disease and some studies have stated that the dominant of this disease is 1 in 100 worldwide [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref2">2</xref>] . This chronic disease is recognized as long-life disease and the only solution is adherence stickiness to gluten-free products. But this is not easy as many foodstuffs contain gluten [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref3">3</xref>] . Middle Eastern countries and many of families in the world now consume the flat bread type. In general, flat bread is a simple formula produced by a few ingredients. It is consumed either by incorporating foods such as meat or vegetables in the dough or as final products in which food can be placed in the pocket of the two layer flat bread. A correct balance of viscoelastic properties is considered to be an important during flat bread making [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref4">4</xref>] .</p><p>Rice is the main staple food for many countries, providing 20% of the food energy supply in the world. It is known as queen among cereals after wheat. Rice is characterized by low prolamin, hypoallergenic activity, insipid taste, low sodium and high digestible carbohydrate contents, which is suitable to be incorporated into celiac diets [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>Rice flour, corn and cassava starches were used to obtain non-gluten bread. The type of starches (granule size, amylose/amylopectin content, chemical, and physical modification) could influence the batter consistency and the gelatinization-retrogradation rate; these parameters strongly related to bread quality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>Cassava flour can be used for many people suffering from celiac disease, a chronic enteropathy characterized by an inadequate immune response to ingested gluten from wheat, rye, barley, and triticale [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref7">7</xref>] . Reduction in the consumption or outright elimination of gluten-free foods would be desirable [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref8">8</xref>] . Cassava flour (CF) is one of the major products from cassava roots treated in the world food market [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref9">9</xref>] . Cassava flour has also continued to find wider applications in foods, feed and chemical industries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>In particular, proteins isolated from legumes and dairy sources are most often added to gluten-free products [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>Hydrocolloids are substances that are used as additives for the purpose of reproducing similar viscoelastic properties to the gluten. They are water-soluble polysaccharides, with varied chemical structures that confer certain properties that make it of a suitable functional application [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref12">12</xref>] . Hydrocolloids such as pectin, guar gum and xanthan gum are added to naturally gluten-free flours to mimic the viscoelastic properties of gluten and to improve structure, sensory attributes and shelf-life of these products [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>Pumpkins are extensively grown in tropical and subtropical countries. Traditionally it is consumed as freshly boiled, steamed or processed food items such as soup or curry. Pumpkin is high in β-carotene, which gives its yellow or orange color [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref13">13</xref>] . Consumption of foods containing carotene helps in prevention of eye disorders, cancer and skin diseases [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref14">14</xref>] . Incorporation of β-carotene rich foods in diets is the best measure to improve vitamin A nutrition of individuals to overcome the problems and diseases caused by vitamin A deficiency [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref15">15</xref>] .</p><p>The development of good quality gluten free bread is a serious task. Therefore, many researchers have investigated the substitution of gluten by ingredients able to mimic its functional properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref16">16</xref>] .</p><p>Bread is a staple diet that is consumed daily and its quality and sensory attributes are highly considered by consumers. But the quality of the gluten-free bread might be different than conventional heat bread due to lack of gluten [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>Bread staling involves crumb firming and has been attributed to several factors including recrystallization of amylopectin, water redistribution, and the state of amorphous phase. In wheat bread, the gluten network slows down the movement of water from the bread crumb to crust, and thus the lack of this structure in gluten-free bread should enhance the water movement resulting in bread that is more prone to stale [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref17">17</xref>] .</p><p>Gluten-free biscuits are typically round cakes of bread that are leavened with baking powder, baking soda or sometimes yeast. It may also refer to cookies or crackers. They are mostly sweet and in history they were used by travelers as they were long-lasting foods and easy to carry [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref18">18</xref>] .</p><p>The diet of celiac patients must be completely free of any gluten, so all the products from wheat, rye, barley and oat must be replaced with corn, rice, millet equivalents and various types of starch (corn, rice and potato) or appropriate mixtures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>This investigation aimed to use cassava flour and extruded soy protein (ESP) in preparing gluten-free flat bread and biscuits with high nutritional value for people suffering from celiac disease.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Materials</title><p>Broken rice supplied by Rice Milling Company, Dakahlia, Egypt. Cassava Flour was obtained from Royal House Market, Heliopolis, Cairo, Egypt. Extruded soy protein (ESP) was obtained from AWA for food additives company Alex., Egypt. Pumpkin vegetable, salt, sugar powder, butter, eggs and baking powder are purchased from local markets, Cairo, Egypt. Xanthan was obtained from Doves farm foods Co. UK.</p>Chemicals<p>All chemicals used were purchased from Algomhorya Company, Giza, Egypt.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Preparation of Raw Materials</title><sec id="s2_2_1"><title>2.2.1. Rice Flour</title><p>The broken rice was directly ground into flour using the mixer grinder and sieving through 40 mesh sieve and placed on a cooling rack in refrigerator [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref19">19</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_2"><title>2.2.2. Pumpkin Powder</title><p>The peeled pumpkin was converted into 10mm size cubes then cut into slices (2 mm) and subjected for pretreatments such as blanching (94˚C for 2 min) then dried for preparation of powder using vacuum dryer (Vacuum Oven ADP-31 Made In Japan). Vacuum drying of pumpkin slices was carried out at 80˚C and 700 mm Hg vacuum. The dried pumpkin was milling and sieving through an 40-mesh and placed on a cooling rack in refrigerator [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref20">20</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_3"><title>2.2.3. Preparation of Products</title><p>1) Flat bread</p><p>The flat bread blends shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. Formulas were treated, hydrothermally (as a prelimimary study) to reach the quantity of warm water (60, 65, 70, 75 and 80 ml). For preparation flat bread dough, warm water</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Formulation and added ingredients for flat bread and biscuits</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Ingredients (g)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Flat bred</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Biscuits</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Rice flour</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cassava flour</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ESP<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pumpkin powder</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Xanthan</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Salt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sugar</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Whole egg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Baking powder</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Butter</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Warm water (ml)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>*</sup>ESP: Extruded soy protein.</p><p>added to formulated flour and gelatinized for 3 min on Steam cooker. The dough of each formula divided into 15 g pieces. Then, every piece of dough shaped, into roller shape (2 mm thick and 15 mm diameter) and baked in electric oven at 250˚C for 3 min. Then air cooled, packed in polyethylene bags.</p><p>2) Biscuits</p><p>The biscuit blends shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. It prepared according to the methods described by Oyewole et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref21">21</xref>] . Butter and sugar were mixed in (a Kenwood mixer) at a medium speed until a light and fluffy cream was formed, added egg and continue the mixing. Cassava flour, rice flour, (ESP), pumpkin powder and xanthan were slowly added to the mixture then rolled on a flat rolling board. Circular biscuits were cut, placed on greased baking trays and baked in an electric oven (Kumatel, Turkey) at 160˚C for 15 min.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Analysis</title><sec id="s2_3_1"><title>2.3.1. Chemical Composition</title><p>Proximate analysis including moisture, protein, fat, ash and crude fiber were carried out according to the methods of AOAC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref22">22</xref>] . Carbohydrates content was calculated by difference.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_2"><title>2.3.2. β-Carotene Content</title><p>β-carotene was determined by using water-saturated n-butanol (WSB) according to the method outlined by Santra et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref23">23</xref>] A calibration curve was made from known quantities of β-carotene. β-carotene content was expressed as &#181;g/100 on dry weight basis. Vitamin A value calculation was performed based on vitamin A activity of the β-carotenes according to the conversion factor provided by the Food and Nutrition Board, Institute Of Medicine [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref24">24</xref>] . Vitamin A value was expressed in retinol activity equivalents (RAE), which represents vitamin A activity as retinol. Where, 12 &#181;g of β-carotene from foods are required to provide the body with 1 &#181;g of retinol, giving dietary β-carotene an RAE ratio of 12:1.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_3"><title>2.3.3. Alkaline Water Retention Capacity of Flat Bread during Storage</title><p>Alkaline water retention capacity (AWRC) values of flat bread were measured at 0, 24, 48 and 72 h of bread storage at −20˚C according to Yamazaki [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref25">25</xref>] and modified by Kitterman and Rubenthaler [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref26">26</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_4"><title>2.3.4. Water Holding Capacity (WHC) of Flat Bread</title><p>Water holding capacity (WHC) was performed according to the method of Beuchat [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref27">27</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_5"><title>2.3.5. Total Calories of Flat Bread and Biscuits</title><p>Total calories of flat bread and biscuits were calculated from the following equation as reported by James [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref28">28</xref>] . Energy value = 4 (g protein + g carbohydrates) + 9 (g fat).</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_6"><title>2.3.6. Physical Properties of Biscuits</title><p>The diameter and thickness of biscuits were measured with a venire caliper. Spread ratio was calculated from the ratio of diameter to thickness as described by Gains [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref29">29</xref>] method. The average of weight biscuit (5 piece) was measured in (g). Volume (cm<sup>3</sup>) was measured by displacement of rapeseeds and specific volume was determined by dividing volume (cm<sup>3</sup>)/weight (g). Density was calculated by dividing weight (g) out volume (cm<sup>3</sup>) and expressed as (g/cm<sup>3</sup>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref30">30</xref>] . The specific volume of biscuits was determined according to the method described in AACC [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref31">31</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_7"><title>2.3.7. Color Measurements of Flat Bread and Biscuits</title><p>External color of the products was measured according to the method outlined by McGurie [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref32">32</xref>] using a hand- held Chromameter (model CR-400, Konica Minolta, Japan).</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_8"><title>2.3.8. Texture Profile Analysis (TPA) of Biscuits</title><p>Hardness and adhesiveness of biscuits were measured by using Brookfield Engineering Lab. Inc., Middleboro, MA 02346-1031 USA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref31">31</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_3_9"><title>2.3.9. Organoleptic Evaluation of Products</title><p>1) Flat bread</p><p>Flat bread samples were organoleptically evaluated for its sensory characteristics. Half slice of each bread sample was served for ten panelists on white, odor and disposable plates. Samples were scored for, taste, chewing ability, texture, aroma, color and overall acceptability using a score from 1 to 10. The evaluation was carried out according to the method of Land and Shepherd [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref33">33</xref>] .</p><p>2) Biscuits</p><p>Biscuit samples were organoleptically evaluated by ten panelists for its sensory characteristics: appearance, color, odor, texture, taste and overall acceptability as the method described by Larmond [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref34">34</xref>] . The maximum score of each attribute was (10) degrees.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Statistical Analysis</title><p>The obtained data from chemical, physical and sensory evaluation were exposed to analysis of variance (ANOVA). Duncan’s multiple range tests at (P ≤ 0.05) level was used to compare between means.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Chemical Composition of Raw Materials</title><p>The proximate composition of raw materials used for the preparation of bakery products (flat bread and biscuits) is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. The obtained data revealed that the highest content of protein found in extruded soy protein (ESP) 56.82%. While, the lowest value was found in cassava flour (1.05%). Fat content ranged from 0.62 up to 4.00% for cassava flour and (ESP), respectively. The values were obtained agreed with those reported by Tharise et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref35">35</xref>] and Ogunjobi and Ognwolu [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref9">9</xref>] . Pumpkin powder had the highest content of ash 5.83% followed by ESP (4.78%). These results agreed with Pongjanta et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref36">36</xref>] . Fiber content was (1.94%, 1.09%, 2.47% and 2.98%) for rice flour, cassava flour, (ESP) and pumpkin powder, respectively. Cassava flour, rice flour and pumpkin powder had high carbohydrates content 95.83, 89.38 and 84.30%, respectively. Whiles, ESP had the lowest value 31.92%. These results are in agreement with Tharise et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref35">35</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Flat Bread</title><sec id="s3_2_1"><title>3.2.1. Chemical Analysis of Flat Bread</title><p>The chemical composition of flat bread are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>. Data showed that protein content increased as increase ESP level. The highest value was 9.15% for sample No. 5 (10% ESP). On the other hand, fat, ash and fiber contents were increased significantly in all samples. This may be due to the addition of ESP. These results agreed with Hegazy et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref37">37</xref>] who showed that the chemical composition of gluten free bread samples evident increase in protein, fat and ash contents in all gluten free bread samples, probably due to addition of soy flours. Carbohydrate content decreased significantly in all same samples compared with control (sample No. 1). This may be attributed to the increment in protein content.</p><p>Carotenoids have been extensively studied due to their important biological functions for humans and also as natural pigments. Relations between carotenoid and vitamin A were found, and some of them have provitamin A activity (α-carotene, β-carotene, γ-carotene, β-zeacarotene and others), which could be transformed in vitamin A inside the animal organism [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref38">38</xref>] .</p><p>Data in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> represents β-carotene &#181;g/100g flat bread. It could be noticed that β-carotene content ranged</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Chemical composition of raw materials (g/100g) on dry weight basis</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Rice flour</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cassava flour</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >E.S.P<sup>*</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pumpkin powder</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Protein</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.09<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.82<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.09<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fat</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.67<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.62<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.00<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.39<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ash</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.93<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.73<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.78<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.83<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fiber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.94<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.09<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.47<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.98<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total carbohydrates</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.38<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.83<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.92<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.30<sup>c</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>*</sup>Extruded soy protein. Data are presented as means (n = 3) &amp; means within a row with different letters are significantly different at (P ≤ 0.05).</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Phsico-chemical analysis of flat bread on dry weight basis</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Parameters (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Flat bread samples</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Protein</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.68<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.76<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.84<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.93<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.15<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fat</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.68<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.75<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.83<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.92<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.15<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ash</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.33<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.46<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.59<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.72<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.85<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fiber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.91<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.18<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total carbohydrates</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.74<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.25<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >87.83<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.38<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.67<sup>e</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carotenoids</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >β-carotene (&#181;g/100g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102.10<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >465.30<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >467.90<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >481.30<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >484.40<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vitamin A (&#181;g RAE)<sup>**</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.40</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Caloric value (kcal/100g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >406.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >404.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >404.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >403.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >403.60</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(WHC<sup>*</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.61<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.74<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.77<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.82<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.07<sup>a</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>*</sup>WHC: Water Holding Capacity. <sup>**</sup>Retinol Activity Equivalent (RAE). 1 RAE = 1 &#181;g retinol, 12 &#181;g β-carotene, whereas the RAE for preformed vitamin A is the same as Retinol Equivalent (RE). 1 = (0 ESP), 2 = (2.5% ESP), 3 = (5% ESP), 4 = (7.5% ESP), 5 = (10% ESP). Data are presented as means (n = 3) &amp; means within a row with different letters are significantly different at (P ≤ 0.05).</p><p>from 102.10 to 484.40 &#181;g/100g, where flat bread sample No. 5 exhibited the highest amount of β-carotene, while flat bread sample No. 1 (control) had the lowest value. This may be due to the addition of pumpkin powder during formulation <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>. These results agreed with See et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref39">39</xref>] .</p><p>Vitamin A (retinol) is an essential nutrient needed in small amounts by human for the normal functioning of the visual system, growth, development and maintenance of epithelial cellular integrity, immune function and reproduction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref40">40</xref>] .</p><p>From the same <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> represents vitamin A values (&#181;g RAE) expressed as β-carotene. As vitamin A calculations dependent on β-carotene content, therefore, their values followed a similar trend than that of β-carotene. Data in the same table indicated that flat bread sample No. 5 had the highest value of vitamin A 40.40 &#181;g RAE, while sample No. 1 had the lowest value 8.51 &#181;g RAE. Provitamin A carotenoids are found in yellow vegetables [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref41">41</xref>] .</p><p>The results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> showed that the caloric value of flat bread nearly the same in all samples, ranged from 403.50 to406.90 calories/100g. These results are in agreement with Hanee and Yaseen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref42">42</xref>] .</p><p>The staling of large scale manufactured flat bread may become a critical factor consideration. Bread staling is a very complex process that cannot be explained by a single effect, amylopectin retrogradation, reorganization of polymers within the amorphous region, loss of moisture content, distribution of water content between the amorphous and crystalline zone, and the crumb macroscopic structure must participate in the staling process [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref43">43</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref44">44</xref>] . Brennan et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref45">45</xref>] and Guarda et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref46">46</xref>] reported that xanthan stabilized starch gels and reduced starch retrogradation. Xanthan which lead pronounced effect on viscoelastic properties yielding strengthened and gave a farinograph and extensograph curves similar to the curve of wheat flour dough.</p><p>Hence, alkaline water retention capacity (AWRC) during storage of the flat bread is the important experiment for indication on staling degree and freshness. It was determined at different periods at 0, 24, 48 and 72 h as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> it could be noticed that AWRC values of flat bread samples of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 at zero time were (131.6, 155.1, 164.1, 173.6 and 179.9%), respectively. After 24 h of storage sample (No. 2) had the higher (AWRC) compared with the other samples. Same trend was observed for this sample (No. 2) at 48 and 72 h. This means that the (2.5%) of ESP is suitable for production of gluten-free flat bread. These results are in agreement with Duska et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref47">47</xref>] who mentioned that addition of ESP can be successfully used in a high quality gluten-free bread production. These results agreed with Sciarini et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref7">7</xref>] reported that soy flours showed the best quality attributes: high specific volume, good crumb, appearance, soft texture and low staling rate. The addition of soy caused crumb softening and retarded bread staling as soy proteins had a high water holding capacity and they could interfere in starch retrogradation.</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Alkaline water retention capacity of flat bread</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-2701598x6.png"/></fig><p>With respect to water holding capacity (WHC) it could be observed from the same <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> that WHC increased insignificantly by increasing the level of ESP except for sample No. 5 which supplemented with 10% ESP. Whereas, the increasing rate in water holding capacity was 12.74%. Higher water absorption capacity of dough represents consistency which is desirable in bread making. Therefore, it is found that increase in ESP level slightly increase water holding capacity of the flat bread. These results are in agreement with Shaikh et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref48">48</xref>] who reported that the water absorption is due to increase the quality of flour mixture which also increase the retention of moisture during dough processing for baked products.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_2"><title>3.2.2. Color Measurements of Flat Bread</title><p>Color is one of the most important quality attributes of flat bread [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref49">49</xref>] color measurements of the flat bread are illustrated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>. Data indicated that supplementation with ESP and pumpkin powder significantly decreased the lightness (L) values. Control flat bread (No. 1) recorded the highest value, while flat bread No. 5 (10%) ESP had the lowest value. The redness (a) and yellowness values of the flat bread significantly increased in all flat bread samples compared with control (No. 1). Like yellowness value, color saturation value (c) of flat bread No. 5 was found to be the highest value (31.03). Besides, supplementation with ESP and pumpkin powder decreased the hue angle significantly for all samples compared with control (86.15). The results in the same table showed that the color of flat bread samples No. 1, No. 2 and No. 3 was yellow while, samples No. 4 and No. 5 was orange yellow. These results are in agreement with those reported by Lorena et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref50">50</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_2_3"><title>3.2.3. Sensory Evaluation of Flat Bread</title><p>Photographs of flat bread are illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>. Sensory evaluation scores for the flat bread supplemented with different levels of ESP are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>. Sensory evaluation was conducted according to ranking tests which was developed for assessing the food products acceptability, in which higher the score indicates to higher acceptability and quality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref42">42</xref>] .</p><p>The results revealed that flat bread No. 2 recorded the highest score of taste (9.36) followed by sample No. 3 (9.35), whereas the lowest score found in sample No. 1 (control). Chewing ability of flat bread No. 3 recorded the highest score (9.28), followed by No. 2 (8.92). This indicates that ESP addition at 2.5 and 5% level affected the chewing ability characteristics.</p><p>From the observed data in the same <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref> texture score increased insignificantly in all samples compared with control. So, the addition of ESP improved the texture score. In respect the Aroma, there are no significant differences between all samples and control. Color score increased significantly for sample No. 2, No. 3 and No. 4 relative to control except for sample No. 5. Statistical analysis of sensory scores indicated that the best overall acceptability of the produced gluten-free flat bread can be obtained by 2.5 and/or 5% ESP (samples No. 2 and No. 3) in bread formulation. These results are agreement with Lorena et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref50">50</xref>] and Kadam et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref51">51</xref>] .</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Flat bread photographs [1 = (0 ESP), 2 = (2.5% ESP), 3 = (5% ESP), 4 = (7.5% ESP), 5 = (10% ESP)]</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-2701598x7.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Color measurements of flat bread<sup>*</sup></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Flat bread samples</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.61<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.87<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.64<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >54.74<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.76<sup>e</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.77<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.75<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.76<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.43<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.55<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.32<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.45<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.93<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.35<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.14<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.46<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.67<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.36<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.04<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.03<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.15<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.14<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >80.25<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.25<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.94<sup>e</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Color</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yellow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yellow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yellow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Orange yellow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Orange yellow</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>*</sup>L (lightness with L = 100 for lightness, and L = zero for darkness), a [(chromaticity on a green (−) to red (+)], b [(chromaticity on a blue (−) to yellow (+)], c (color saturation), h [(hue angle where 0˚ = red to purple, 90˚ = yellow, 180˚ = bluish to green and 270˚ = blue scale. Values are mean of three replicates &#177; SD, number in the same column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at 0.05 level. 1= (0 ESP), 2 = (2.5% ESP), 3 = (5% ESP), 4 = (7.5% ESP), 5 = (10% ESP). Data are presented as means (n= 3) &amp; Means within a row with different letters are significantly different at (P ≤ 0.05).</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Sensory evaluation of flat bread</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Flat bread samples</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Taste (10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.28<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.36<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.35<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.73<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.71<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chewing ability (10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.13<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.92<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.28<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.42<sup>abc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.57<sup>bc</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Texture (10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.15<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.27<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.58<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.50<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.42<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Aroma (10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.85<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.28<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.26<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.14<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.12<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Color (10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.28<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.92<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.00<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.14<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.43<sup>ab</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Overall Acceptability (50)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.25</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>1 = (0 ESP), 2 = (2.5% ESP), 3 = (5% ESP), 4 = (7.5% ESP), 5 = (10% ESP). Data are presented as means (n = 10) &amp; Means within a row with different letters are significantly different at (P ≤ 0.05).</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Biscuits</title><sec id="s3_3_1"><title>3.3.1. Physical Properties of Biscuits</title><p>Physical properties of biscuits such as diameter, thickness, spread ratio, weight, volume, specific volume and density were studied and given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>. It was observed that as the level of ESP increased, the diameter, thickness, volume and specific volume of biscuits were decreased, whereas the spread ratio, weight and density of biscuits increased. The diameter, Thickness, volume and specific volume were decreased to 4.09, 0.93, 86.64 and 1.65 for sample No. 5 (20% ESP), respectively. These results are in agreement with Kumar et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref52">52</xref>] . While spread ratio, weight, and density increased to 5.29, 49.80, and 0.63, respectively for the same sample. These results agreed with Ogunjobi and Ogunwolu [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref9">9</xref>] who found that the diameter of biscuits made from cassava and soy flour was (5.51 cm), while Onweluzo and Lwezu [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref53">53</xref>] showed that the spread ratio of biscuits supplemented with soy flour increased.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_2"><title>3.3.2. Chemical Analysis of Biscuits</title><p>The results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref> showed the chemical composition of biscuits. There were significant differences in all parameters considered (P &lt; 0.05). The highest value for crude protein content was found in sample No. 5 (15.37%)</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Physical properties of biscuit</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Biscuit samples</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Diameter (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.11<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.07<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.02<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.01<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.09<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Thickness (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.04<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.02<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.97<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.93<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Spread ratio</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.44<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.84<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.92<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.97<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.29<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Weight (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.20<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.40<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.10<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.10<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.80<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Volume (cm<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108.10<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >105.70<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100.30<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.67<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.64<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Specific volume (cm<sup>3</sup>/g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.51<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.47<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.21<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.91<sup>bc</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.65<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Density(g/cm<sup>3</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.41<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.50<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63<sup>a</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>1 = (0 ESP), 2 = (5% ESP), 3 = (10% ESP), 4 = (15% ESP), 5 = (20% ESP). Data are presented as means (n = 3) &amp; means within a row with different letters are significantly different at (P ≤ 0.05).</p><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Chemical analysis of biscuits on dry weight basis</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Biscuit samples</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chemical composition (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Protein</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.01<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.85<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.69<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.53<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.37<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fat</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.74<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.94<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.14<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.34<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.54<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ash</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.58<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.82<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.06<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.30<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.54<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fiber</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.67<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.92<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.04<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total carbohydrates</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.12<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.72<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.31<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >56.91<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53.51<sup>e</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carotenoids</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >β-carotene (&#181;g/100g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >865.20<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1158.30<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1186.50<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1247.30<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1386.20<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Vitamin A (&#181;g RAE)<sup>*</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >103.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >115.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Caloric value (kcal/100g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >748.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >533.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >533.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >532.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >532.40</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>1 = (0 ESP), 2 = (5% ESP), 3 = (10% ESP), 4 = (15% ESP), 5 = (20% ESP). <sup>*</sup>Retinol Activity Equivalent (RAE). 1 RAE = 1 &#181;g retinol, 12 &#181;g β-carotene, whereas the RAE for preformed vitamin A is the same as Retinol Equivalent (RE). Data are presented as means (n = 3) &amp; Means within a row with different letters are significantly different at (P ≤ 0.05).</p><p>while, the lowest content found in sample No. 1 (4.01%). Also the same sample No. 5 characterized by high fat, ash and fiber except for total carbohydrates which was the lowest (28.54%, 1.54%, 1.04% and 53.51%), respectively. This may be due to the high addition level of ESP (20%).</p><p>These results are in agreement with Kumar et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref52">52</xref>] who reported that defatted soy flour incorporation increased the nutritional status of biscuits due to high protein content. Soybean is an excellent health food and it contains 40% good quality protein, 23% carbohydrates and sufficient amounts of minerals and vitamins. Hence, it is superior to other plant proteins as it contains most of the essential amino acids except methionine, which is abundant in cereals, and it is most economical source of dietary protein. Kulkarni and Joshi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref20">20</xref>] showed that the biscuit prepared with optimum level of replacement 2.5% (w/w) from the pumpkin powder was found to be high in carbohydrate, crude fiber, carotene and mineral matter.</p><p>The results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref> represents β-carotene &#181;g/100g in biscuits. It could be noticed that β-carotene content ranged from 865.20 to 1386.20 &#181;g/100g. Biscuit samples contained higher β-carotene contents than control sample (No. 1). The highest value was 1386.20 &#181;g/100g for sample No. 5. These results agreed with Kulkarni and Joshi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref20">20</xref>] .</p><p>Data in the same table indicated that vitamin A (&#181;g RAE) of biscuits expressed as β-carotene. As vitamin A calculations dependent on β-carotene content, therefore, their values followed a similar trend than that of β- carotene. It could be observed that sample No. 5 had the highest value of vitamin A 115.50 &#181;g RAE, while sample No. 1 (control) had the lowest value 72.10 &#181;g RAE. These results are in agreement with Booth et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref54">54</xref>] .</p><p>It could be noticed from <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref> that the caloric values of produced biscuits in all samples were lower than control (No. 1). This may be due to the addition of ESP. These results are in agreement with Shrestha and Noomhorm [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref55">55</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_3"><title>3.3.3. Color Measurements of Biscuits</title><p>Color is one of the most important quality attributes of biscuits [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref55">55</xref>] . Color measurements of biscuits are illustrated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>. Data indicated that supplementation with ESP and pumpkin powder significantly decreased the lightness (L) values of biscuits. Sample No. 1 recorded the highest value (74.06), while sample No. 5 had the lowest (59.25). The redness (a) values increased significantly in sample No. 5 (7.87) compared with No. 1 (2.45). Regarding yellowness (b) values, supplementation with ESP significantly increased the yellowness of biscuits, whereas, sample No. 5 recorded the maximal b value, in contrast, sample No. 1 recorded the minimal b value. Like yellowness value, color saturation value (c) of the same sample No. 5 was found to be the highest value (31.76). In contrast, the same sample had the lowest hue angle (h) value (75.63), compared with control sample (84.86). The resultant in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref> showed that the color of samples No. 1 and No. 2 was yellow, while samples No. 3, No. 4 and No. 5 was Orange yellow. These results are in agreement with those reported by Pereira et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref56">56</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_4"><title>3.3.4. Texture Profile Analysis of Biscuits (TPA)</title><p>Texture analysis is primarily concerned with measurement of the mechanical properties of a product, often a</p><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> Color measurements of biscuits<sup>*</sup></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Biscuit samples</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >L</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.06<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.66<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.43<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.74<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59.25<sup>e</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.45<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.71<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.17<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.84<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.87<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.84<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.46<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.15<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.64<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.77<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.98<sup>e</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.73<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.56<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29.45<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.76<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >h</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.86<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.26<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78.63<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.53<sup>d</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.63<sup>e</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Color</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yellow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Yellow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Orange yellow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Orange yellow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Orange yellow</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>*</sup>L (lightness with L = 100 for lightness, and L = zero for darkness), a [(chromaticity on a green (−) to red (+)], b [(chromaticity on a blue (−) to yellow (+)], c (color saturation), h [(hue angle where 0˚ = red to purple, 90˚ = yellow, 180˚ = bluish to green and 270˚ = blue scale. Values are mean of three replicates &#177; SD, number in the same column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at 0.05 level. 1 = (0 ESP), 2 = (5% ESP), 3 = (10% ESP), 4 = (15% ESP), 5 = (20% ESP); Data are presented as means (n = 3) &amp; Means within a row with different letters are significantly different at (P ≤ 0.05).</p><p>food product, as they relate to its sensory properties detected by human via applying controlled forces to the product and recording its response in the form of force, deformation and time. Texture measurements can be very valuable for the quality control and process optimization as well as for the development of new products with desirable properties and characteristics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref57">57</xref>] .</p><p>Data in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref> presented the textural parameters assessed from texture profile analysis (TPA) test curves results for the biscuits samples. A marked increase in hardness from 2933 g to 4098 g was observed. On the other hand, the biscuits become harder with increasing ESP level. Data showed that sample No. 5 had the highest hardness value (4098 g) compared to other samples and control (2933 g). This may be due to the effect of ESP and pumpkin powder in formulation. These results agreed with Kulkarni and Joshi [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref20">20</xref>] who reported that the replacing 2.5% of formulation by pumpkin powder, the hardness of the biscuits increased compared control sample. Hoojjat and Zabik [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref58">58</xref>] and Lee and Beuchat [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref59">59</xref>] reported that more strength was needed to break cookies incorporated with legumes flour. This might have resulted from incorporation of protein rich flour which need more water to obtain good cookie dough, and the cookies prepared from high-absorption dough tend to be extremely hard.</p><p>A similar trend was observed for adhesiveness as it considered maximum negative force generated during probe return. The results in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref> showed that biscuit sample No. 5 had the highest value (5.0 g∙s<sup>−1</sup>) compared with sample No. 1 (1.0 g∙s<sup>−1</sup>). In conclusion increment of hardness and adhesiveness may be due to adding ESP and pumpkin powder.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3_5"><title>3.3.5. Sensory Evaluation of Biscuits</title><p>Sensory evaluation is considered to be a valuable tool in solving problems involving food acceptability. It is useful in product improvement, quality maintenance and more important in a new products development [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56442-ref60">60</xref>] .</p><p>Photographs of biscuits are illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. Sensory evaluation of biscuit samples are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0. It was observed that there were insignificant differences in appearance, color, odor and taste for all samples. While, there was significant differences between all samples and control for texture parameter. Addition of ESP at 20% (sample No. 5) significantly decreased the texture compared to the other samples. From the observation data in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0 it could be concluded that, the best addition level to obtain high overall acceptability score was 5% ESP.</p><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Biscuit photographs [1 = (0 ESP); 2 = (5% ESP); 3 = (10% ESP); 4 = (15% ESP); 5 = (20% ESP)]</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/9-2701598x8.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table9" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref></label><caption><title> Texture properties of biscuits</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Biscuit samples</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hardness (g)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2933</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3234</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3612</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3806</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4098</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Adhesiveness (g∙s<sup>−1</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>1 = (0.0 ESP), 2 = (5% ESP), 3 = (10% ESP), 4 = (15% ESP), 5 = (20% ESP).</p><table-wrap id="table10" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0</label><caption><title> Sensory evaluation of biscuits</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="5"  >Biscuit samples</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Appearance(10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.45<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.91<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.42<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.85<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.65<sup>ab</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Color (10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.64<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.25<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.55<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.51<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.71<sup>ab</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Odor (10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.53<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.11<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.12<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.95<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.82<sup>a</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Texture (10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.51<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.92<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.65<sup>b</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.75<sup>c</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.61<sup>c</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Taste (10)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.35<sup>a</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.13<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.85<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.45<sup>ab</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.35<sup>b</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Overall acceptability (50)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.14</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>1 = (0.0 ESP), 2 = (5% ESP), 3 = (10% ESP), 4 = (15% ESP), 5 = (20% ESP). Data are presented as means (n = 10) &amp; means within a row with different letters are significantly different at (P ≤ 0.05).</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Celiac disease is an autoimmune disorder characterized by intolerance to gluten. It is considered to be a potentially significant cause of poor health in population. All ingredients under study influenced the flat bread and biscuits quality. The importance of added extracted soy protein (ESP), pumpkin powder, rice flour and xanthan gum to cassava flour was evident in assessment of the parameters: nutritional value, texture, color and organoleptic acceptability which improved as these ingredients added. The optimized additions of ESP were 2.5% and 5% for flat bread and 5% for biscuits. The optimal ratio of cassava and rice flour was 1:1 (w/w), 0.1% xanthan gum and 7% pumpkin powder. Addition of xanthan gum helps in formulation of dough. It acts like wheat gluten. On the other hand, pumpkin powder improved the nutritional value of the produced flat bread and biscuits with attractive color to the products. Thus, the produced flat bread and biscuits are suitable for those people suffering from celiac disease especially for children with protein and vitamins deficiency. Addition of ESP not only enhanced the nutritional value of flat bread but also retarded the staling. This study succeeded to achieve flat bread and biscuits nearly with high quality and acceptability.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.56442-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Demirkesen, I., Sumnu, G. and Sahin, S. (2013) Quality of Gluten-Free Bread Formulations Baked Indifferent Ovens. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 6, 746-753.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11947-011-0712-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Catassi, C. and Fasano, A. (2008) Celiac Disease. Current Opinion in Gastroenterology, 24, 687-691. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MOG.0b013e32830edc1e</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Motrena, S.G., Carvalho, M.J., Canada, J., Alvarenga, N.B., Lidon, F.C. and Elisa, B.P. (2011) Characterization of Gluten-Free Bread Prepared from Maize, Rice and Tapioca Flours Using the Hydrocolloid Seaweed Agar-Agar. Recent Research in Science and Technology, 3, 64-68.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Al-Dmoor, H.M. (2012) Flat Bread: Ingredients and Fortification. Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops Foods, 4, 2-8.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-837X.2011.00121.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Phimolsiripol, Y., Mukprasirt, A. and Schoenlechner, R. (2012) Quality Improvement of Rice Based Gluten Free Bread Using Different Dietary Fiber Fractions of Rice Bran. Journal of Cereal Science, 56, 389-395. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2012.06.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sanchez, H.D., Osella, C.A. and de la Torre, M.A. (2002) Optimization of Gluten Free Bread Prepared from Corn Starch, Rice Flour and Cassava Starch. Journal of Food Science, 67, 416-419. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2002.tb11420.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sciarini, L.S., Ribotta, P.D., Leon, A.E. and Perez, G.T. (2008) Influence of Gluten-Free Flours and Their Mixtures on Batter Properties and Bread Quality. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 3, 577-585. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11947-008-0098-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Turabi, E., Sumnu, G. and Sahin, S. (2008) Optimization of Baking of Rice Cakes in Infrared-Microwave Combination Oven by Response Surface Methodology. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 1, 64-73. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11947-007-0003-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ogunjobi, M.A.K. and Ogunwolu, S.O. (2010) Physicochemical and Sensory Properties of Cassava Flour Biscuits Supplemented with Cashew Apple Powder. Journal of Food Technology, 8, 24-29. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/jftech.2010.24.29</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Balagopalan, C. (2002) Cassava Utilization in Food and Feed Industry. In: Hillocks, R.J., Thresh, J.M. and Beelloti, A.C., Eds., Biology, Production and Utilization, CAB International, Cassava, 301-318.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9780851995243.0301</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moore, M.M., Heinbockel, M., Dockery, P., Ulmer, H.E. and Arendt, E.K. (2006) Network Formation in Gluten-Free Bread with Application of Transglutaminase. Cereal Chemistry, 83, 28-36.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/CC-83-0028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anton, A. and Artfield, S. (2008) Hydrocolloids in Gluten Free Breads: Review. International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition, 59, 11-23.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09637480701625630</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bhaskarachary, K., Ananthan, R. and Longvah, T. (2008) Carotene Content of Some Common (Cereals, Pulses, Vegetables, Spices and Condiments) and Unconventional Sources of Plant Origin. Food Chemistry, 106, 85-89.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.05.071</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Bendich</surname><given-names> A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1989</year>)<article-title>Carotenoids and the Immune Response</article-title><source> The Journal of Nutrition</source><volume> 119</volume>,<fpage> 112</fpage>-<lpage>115</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Siems, S., Wiswedel, I., Salerno, C., Crifo, C., Augustin, L.S., Langhans, C.D. and Sommerberg, O. (2005) β-Carotene Breakdown Products May Impair Mitochondrial Functions Potential Side Effects of High Dose β-Carotene Supplementation. Journal Nutritional Biochemistry, 16, 385-397.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnutbio.2005.01.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lazaridou, A., Duta, D., Papageorgiou, M., Belc, N. and Biliaderis, C.G. (2007) Effect of Hydrocolloids on Dough Rheology and Bread Quality Parameters in Gluten-Free Formulations. Journal of Food Engineering, 79, 1033-1047.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.03.032</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Willhoft, E.M. (1971) Bread Staling: I.—Experimental Study. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 22, 176-180.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740220406</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mehta, K.R., Shivkar, S.M. and Shekhar, A. (2014) A Study of Multigrain Gluten Free Groundnut and Edible Gum Biscuits. International Journal of Food and Nutritional Sciences, 3, 201-206.  
www.ask.com</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Prasad, K., Singh, Y. and Anil, A. (2012) Effects of Grinding Methods on the Characteristics of Pusa 1121 Rice Flour. Journal of Tropical Agriculture and Food Science, 40, 193-201.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kulkarni, A.S. and Joshi, D.C. (2013) Effect of Replacement of Wheat Flour with Pumpkin Powder on Textural and Sensory Qualities of Biscuit. International Food Research Journal, 20, 587-591.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oyewole, O.B., Sanni, L.O. and Ogunjobi, M.A. (1996) Production of Biscuits Using Cassava Flour. Nigerian Food Journal, 14, 24-29.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">AOAC (2005) Official Methods of Analysis of Association of Official Analytical Chemists. In: Kenesseth Helrick, B., Ed., 15th Edition.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Santra, M., Rao, V.S. and Tamhankar, S.A. (2003) Modification of AACC Procedure for Measuring β-Carotene in Early Generation Durum Wheat. Cereal Chemistry, 80, 130-131.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM.2003.80.2.130</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Food and Nutrition Board, Institute of Medicine (2001) Dietary Reference Intakes: Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc. National Academy Press, Washington DC, 82-161.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Yamazaki</surname><given-names> W.T. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1953</year>)<article-title>An Alkaline Water Retention Capacity Test for the Evaluation of Cookie Baking Potentialities of Soft Winter Wheat Flours</article-title><source> Cereal Chemistry</source><volume> 30</volume>,<fpage> 242</fpage>-<lpage>246</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kitterman, J.S. and Rubenthaler, G.L. (1971) Assessing the Quality of Early Generation Wheat Selection with the Micro AWRC Test. Cereal Science Today, 16, 313-316.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Beuchat, L.R. (1977) Functional and Electrophoretic Characteristics of Succinylated Peanut Flour Protein. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 25, 258-261.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf60210a044</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">James, C.S. (1995) General Food Studies. In: Analytical Chemistry of Foods, Chapter 6, Blachie Academic &amp; Professional, 137-171.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2165-5_6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Gains</surname><given-names> C.S. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1991</year>)<article-title>Instrumental Measurement of the Hardness of Cookies and Crackers</article-title><source> Cereal Foods World</source><volume> 36</volume>,<fpage> 989</fpage>-<lpage>996</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sai Manohar, R. and Haaridas, R.P. (1997) Effect of Mixing Period and Additives on the Rheological Characteristics of Dough and Quality of Biscuits. Journal of Cereal Science, 25,197-206.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jcrs.1996.0081</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">AACC (2002) Approved Method of American Association of Cereal Chemists. Approved Methods of AACC Published by the American Association of Cereal Chemists. 13th.Edition, St. Paul, Inc., Minnesota.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mc Gurie</surname><given-names> R.G. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1992</year>)<article-title>Reporting of Objective Color Measurements</article-title><source> HortScience</source><volume> 27</volume>,<fpage> 1254</fpage>-<lpage>1255</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Land, D.G. and Shepherd, R. (1988) Scaling and Ranking Methods. In: Piggott, J.R., Ed., Sensory Analysis of Foods, Elsevier Applied Science, London, 155-185.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Larmond, E. (1977) Laboratory Methods for Sensory Evaluation of Foods. Canadian Government Publishing Centre, Otawa.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tharise, N., Julianti, E. and Nurminah, M. (2014) Evaluation of Physico-Chemical and Functional Properties of Composite Flour from Cassava, Rice, Potato, Soybean and Xanthan Gum as Alternative of Wheat Flour. International Food Research Journal, 21, 1641-1649.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pongjanta, J., Naulbunrang, A., Kawngdang, S., Manon, T. and Thepjaikat, T. (2006) Utilization of Pumpkin Powder in Bakery Products. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology, 28, 71-79.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hegazy, A.I., Ammar, M.S. and Ibrahium, M.I. (2009) Production of Egyptian Gluten-Free Bread. World Journal of Dairy &amp; Food Sciences, 4, 123-128.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pinheiro-Santana, H.M., Stringheta, P.C., Brandao, S.C.C., Paez, H.H. and de Queiróz, V.M.V. (1998) Evaluation of Total Carotenoids, α- and β-Carotene in Carrots (Daucus carota L.) during Home Processing. Food Science and Technology (Campinas), 18.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-20611998000100009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">See, E.F., Wan Nadiah, W.A. and Noor Aziah, A.A. (2007) Physico-Chemical and Sensory Evaluation of Bread Supplemented with Pumpkin Flour. ASEAN Food Journal, 14, 123-130.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">FAO/WHO (2004) Vitamin and Mineral Requirements in Human Nutrition. 2nd.Edition, World Health Organization and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Olapade, A.A. and Ogunade, O.A. (2014) Production and Evaluation of Flours and Crunchy Snacks from Sweet Potato (Ipomea batatas) and Maize Flours. Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 21, 203-208.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hanee, M.A. and Yaseen, G. (2014) Novelty Formulas of Free Gluten Flat Bread for Celiac Disease Patients. World Journal of Medical Sciences, 11, 306-311.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Davidou, S., LeMeste, M., Debever, E. and Bekaert, D. (1996) A Contribution to the Study of Staling of White Bread: Effect of Water and Hydrocolloid. Food Hydrocolloids, 10, 375-383.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0268-005X(96)80016-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rojas, J.A., Rosell, C.M. and Benedito, C. (1999) Pasting Properties of Different Wheat Flour-Hydrocolloid System. Food Hydrocolloids, 13, 27-33.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0268-005X(98)00066-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brennan, J.S., Higgins, K.F., Cordell, J.R. and Stamatiou, V.A. (2004) Juvenile Salmon Composition, Timing Distribution, and Diet in Marine Nearshore Waters of Central Puget Sound in 2001-2002. King Country Department of Natural Resources and Parks, Seattle, 164 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guarda, A., Rosell, C.M., Benedito, C. and Galotto, M.J. (2004) Different Hydrocolloids as Bread Improves and Antistaling Agents. Food Hydrocolloids, 18, 241-247.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0268-005X(03)00080-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Duska, C., Dubravka, N., Dubravka, T., Ingrid, B. and Domagoj, G. (2007) Gluten Free Bread Production by the Corn Meal and Soybean Flour Extruded Blend Usage. Agriculture Conspectus Scientifics, 72, 227-232.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shaikh, I.M., Shalini, K.G. and Ananthanarayan, L. (2007) Staling of Chapatti (Indian Unleavened Flat Bread). Food Chemistry, 101, 113-119.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.01.015</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mahmoud, R.M., Yousif, E.I., Gadallah, M.G.E. and Alawneh, A.R. (2013) Formulations and Quality Characterization of Gluten-Free Egyptian Balady Flat Bread. Annals of Agricultural Science, 58, 19-25.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2013.01.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lorena, S.S., Pablo, D.R., Alberto, E.L. and Gabriela, T.P. (2008) Influence of Gluten-Free Flours and Their Mixtures on Batter Properties and Bread Quality. Food Bioprocess Technol, 3, 577-588.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kadam, M.L., Salve, R.V., Mehrajfatema, Z.M. and More, S.G. (2012) Development and Evaluation of Composite Flour for Missi Roti/Chapatti. Journal of Food Processing &amp; Technology, 3.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names> S.</given-names></name>,<name name-style="western"><surname> Rekha and Sinha</surname><given-names> L. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2010</year>)<article-title>Evaluation of Quality Characteristics of Soy Based Millet Biscuits</article-title><source> Advances in Applied Science Research</source><volume> 1</volume>,<fpage> 187</fpage>-<lpage>196</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Onweluzo, J.C. and Lwezu, E.N. (1998) Composition and Characteristics of Cassava Soy Bean and Wheat Soy Bean Biscuits. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 35, 128-131.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Booth, S.L., Johns, T. and Kuhnlein, H.V. (1992) Natural Food Sources of Vitamin A and Provitamin A. UNU Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 14, 6-19.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shrestha, A.K. and Noomhorm, A. (2002) Comparison of Physic-Chemical Properties of Biscuits Supplemented with Soy and Kinema Flours. International of Journal Science and Technology, 37, 361-368.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pereira, D., Paula, M.R.C. and Raquel, P.F. (2013) Analysis of the Physical-Chemical and Sensorial Properties of Maria Type Cookies. Acta Chimica Slovaca, 6, 269-280.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bourne, M.C. (1978) Texture Profile Analysis. Food Technology, 32, 62-66, 72.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hoojjat, P. and Zabik, M.E. (1984) Sugar-Snap Cookies Prepared with Wheat Navy Bean-Sesame Seed Flour Blends. Cereal Chemistry, 61, 41-44.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lee, C. and Beuchat, L.R. (1991) Functional and Sensory Properties of Muffins and Cookies Containing Dried Fermented Peanut Milk. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft &amp; Technologie, 24, 528-534.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56442-ref60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kramer, A. and Twigg, B.A. (1974) Quality Control for the Food Industry. 3rd Edition, AVI. Inc., Westport.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>