<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Applied Mathematics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-7385</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/am.2015.65074</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AM-56259</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Integral Representations for the Price of Vanilla Put Options on a Basket of Two-Dividend Paying Stocks
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>unday</surname><given-names>Emmanuel Fadugba</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Chuma</surname><given-names>Raphael Nwozo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Mathematics, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Mathematical Sciences, Ekiti State University, Ado Ekiti, Nigeria</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>emmasfad2006@yahoo.com(UEF)</email>;<email>crnwozo@yahoo.com(CRN)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>05</day><month>05</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>783</fpage><lpage>792</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>8</day>	<month>April</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>7</month>	<year>May</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>12</day>	<month>May</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  This paper presents integral representations for the price of vanilla put options, namely, European and American put options on a basket of two-dividend paying stocks using integral method based on the double Mellin transform. We show that by the decomposition of the integral equation for the price of American basket put option, the integral equation for the price of European basket put option can be obtained directly.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Black-Scholes Partial differential Equation</kwd><kwd> Double Mellin Transform</kwd><kwd> Early Exercise Premium</kwd><kwd> Vanilla Basket Put Option</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>An option is a contingent claim that presents its holder with the right, but not obligation, to purchase a given amount of underlying asset at some future date. In practice, the underlying asset is often the price of stock, commodity, foreign exchange rate, debit instrument, stock indices or future contract. Although the history of options extended back to several decades, it was not until 1973 that the trading of option was formalized by the establishment of the Chicago Board of Options of Exchange (CBOE). This same year was also a trading point for research in the valuation of financial derivatives.</p><p>Black and Scholes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56259-ref1">1</xref>] published their seminar work on options valuation, in which they described a mathematical frame work for finding the fair price of a European option by means of a non-arbitrage argument to describe a second order partial differential equation which governed the evolution of the option price with respect to the time to expiry and the price of the underlying asset. Since then, there has been an explosive growth, both in the trading and the study of options of various kinds. Despite the success of the Black-Scholes model on hedging and pricing contingent claims, Merton [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56259-ref2">2</xref>] noted early that options quoted on the markets differed systematically from their predicted values, which led up to questioning the distributional assumptions based on geometric wiener process. European options are options that can be exercised only at the maturity date whereas American options can be exercised on or before the expiration date. The valuation of American options has received a lot of attention because most of options traded are of the American type. The early exercise premium of American options leads to a free boundary value problem under the framework of the Black and Scholes.</p><p>Basket option is defined as an option on a collection or basket of stocks. In other words, basket options are options whose payoff depends on the value of a basket, i.e., a portfolio of assets. Equity index options and currency basket options are classical examples of basket options. However, basket options are becoming increasingly widespread in commodity and particularly energy markets. The volatility of the basket is lower than the individual volatilities of the stocks and therefore these options are popular as hedging tools. The valuation of basket options is a challenging task because the underlying value is a weighted sum of individual asset prices. The common assumption of log-normality (and hence, the famous Black-Scholes formula) cannot be applied directly, because the sum of log-normal random variables is not log-normal. The valuation problem for American option on a basket of two-dividend paying stocks leads to the solution of a multi-dimensional free boundary problem.</p><p>Panini and Srivastav [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56259-ref3">3</xref>] considered option pricing with Mellin transforms. They derived the integral equation representations for the price of European and American basket put options with non-dividend yield using the Mellin transform techniques. Basket option pricing using Mellin transforms was considered by Manuge and Kim [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56259-ref4">4</xref>] . They used the Mellin transform to derive the analytical pricing formulas and Greeks for European and American basket put options.</p><p>For mathematical background, applications of the Mellin transforms and various numerical methods for the valuation of basket options (see [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56259-ref5">5</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56259-ref11">11</xref>] ) just mention a few.</p><p>In this paper, we apply double Mellin transform to derive integral representations for the prices of vanilla basket put options, namely, European and American basket put options with dividend yields. The rest of the paper is structured as follows. Section 2 presents the overview of the Black-Scholes partial differential equation for vanilla basket options of multi-dividend paying stocks. In Section 3, we apply the double Mellin transform method to derive the integral equations for the representations of the price of both European and American put options on a basket of two-dividend paying stocks. Section 4 concludes the paper.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Black-Scholes Partial Differential Equation for Vanilla Basket Options of Multi-Stocks with Dividend Yields</title><p>Consider the price of the underlying asset for the multi-stocks given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1107"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (1) is defined on the probability space <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and follows the geometric wiener process given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1108"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x8.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a sample space, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is a set of events, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the probability measure, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the drift parameter, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the volatility and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the Brownian motion.</p><p>The non-homogeneous Black-Scholes partial differential equation for vanilla options on a basket of multi- stocks with dividend yield is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1109"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x15.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (3) can also be written as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1110"><label>(3a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x16.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Suppose <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a multi-asset options with Lipschitz payoff function<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The boundary conditions imposed on (3) are reliant on the type of option (call or put). In general we let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x19.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Consider a vanilla put option; recall that when the option is granted exercise rights for any<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the problem divides the price space into two regions. This early exercise boundary will depends on the payoff function of the option under consideration. The payoff function for a vanilla put option on a basket of multi-stocks is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1111"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x22.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (4) is called the terminal condition for vanilla put option. For the put option, the continuation region</p><p>C exists for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and the exercise region E exists for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The smooth pasting condition can then</p><p>be stated as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1112"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x25.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>When<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, the payoff in (4) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1113"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x27.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Similar to the single asset option, the payoff function is equivalent to (4). As usual the option must satisfy the condition <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in C. Due to the decomposition of American options, we can obtain the European option formula without directly solving for it. To utilize the Mellin transform method and the conditions that ensure its existence in [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.56259-ref12">12</xref>] , we assume that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is bounded of polynomial degree when <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x31.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> i.e.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1114"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x32.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>for any <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is called fundamental strip. Equation (7) ensures the existence of the Mellin transform of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> denoted by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>The Mellin transform of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is defined as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1115"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x39.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By definition, the inversion formula for the Mellin transform of (8) is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1116"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x40.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Integral Representations for the Price of Vanilla Put Options on a Basket of Two-Dividend Paying Stocks</title><p>This section presents the Mellin transform method for the valuation of European and American put options on a basket of two stocks with dividend yields.</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Integral Representation for the Price of European Put Options on a Basket of Two-Dividend Paying Stocks</title><p>Setting<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>for <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in (4) and consider the homogeneous part of (4), we have the Black-Scholes partial differential equation for European put option on a basket of two stocks which pays dividend yield of the form</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1117"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x45.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is called the price of European put option on a basket of two stocks <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x47.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>The boundary conditions for (10) are given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1118"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x49.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Now, we find an integral representation for the price of European put option <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> on a basket of two stocks <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> follow geometric wiener process with drift <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, volatilities <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> respectively. So, for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x51.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x56.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x57.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1119"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x58.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where the wiener processes <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are Gaussian random variables with mean zero and variance <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Let <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> denotes the double Mellin transform of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> defined as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1120"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x65.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Conversely, the inversion formula of (13) is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1121"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x66.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Taking the Mellin transform of (10), yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1122"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x67.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1123"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x68.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting (16) into (15), we have</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1124"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x69.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Simplifying further, (17) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1125"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x70.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Setting</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1126"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x71.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus, (18) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1127"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x72.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The general solution of (20) is called the complementary solution since it is homogeneous first order differential equation. The general solution is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1128"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x73.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a constant of integration which is to be determined. Let us consider the terminal condition given by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in (11), then <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> can be obtained as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1129"><label>(22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x77.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x78.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the double Mellin transform of the terminal condition</p><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x79.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Therefore,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1130"><label>(23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x80.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>We introduce dimensionless variables</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1131"><label>(24)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x81.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and using the localizing assumption that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x82.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Then</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1132"><label>(25)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x83.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x84.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Let</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1133"><label>(25a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x85.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Solving for the new domain gives<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x86.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The determinant of the Jacobian matrix is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1134"><label>(25b)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x87.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Thus,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1135"><label>(25c)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x88.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting (25a) and (25c) into (25), we have that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1136"><label>(25d)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x89.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>From (24), for<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we have that <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x90.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x91.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> . Hence (23) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1137"><label>(26)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x92.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using (22) and (26), then (21) yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1138"><label>(27)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x93.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting (27) into (14), we have that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1139"><label>(28)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x94.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (28) is the integral representation of the price of European put option on a basket of two stocks with dividend yield via the double Mellin transform method.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Integral Representation for the Price of American Put Option on a Basket of Two-Dividend Paying Stocks</title><p>Now we consider the double Mellin transforms in order to derive the expression for the price of American put option on a basket of two stocks. American put option on a basket of two stocks gives the option’s holder the right to sell the basket stocks at any time from 0 to <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and not only the expiration date<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x95.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x96.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>The non-homogeneous Black-Scholes partial differential equation for American put option on a basket of two stocks with dividend yield is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1140"><label>(29)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x97.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1141"><label>(30)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x98.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The final time condition or terminal condition is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1142"><label>(31)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x99.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The other boundary conditions are given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1143"><label>(32)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x100.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Let us assume that<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x101.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, then the free bounded condition is determined by the smooth pasting conditions given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1144"><label>(33)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x102.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using the same procedures of the double Mellin transform as for the case of European put option on a basket of two stocks with dividend yield. Let us denote the double Mellin transform for the price of American basket put option <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the complex function of complex variable <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which is defined as<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x103.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x104.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x105.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x106.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x107.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x108.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and can be expressed as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1145"><label>(34)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x109.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Conversely the inversion formula of the double Mellin transform is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1146"><label>(35)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x110.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Taking the Mellin transform of (29), we have that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1147"><label>(36)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x111.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is given by (19) and it has the same coefficient as that of its European put option counterpart. <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x112.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x113.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the Mellin transform of (30) which includes the free boundary as well. The general solution of (36) is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1148"><label>(37)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x114.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the complementary solution of the homogeneous part and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x115.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x116.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the particular solution of the nonhomogeneous part. Thus</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1149"><label>(38)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x117.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is a constant of integration given by <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x118.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x119.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>Therefore,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1150"><label>(39)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x120.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Taking the double Mellin transform of (39) yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1151"><label>(40)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x121.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Let us consider the nonhomogeneous part of (36) whose solution is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1152"><label>(41)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x122.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>But</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1153"><label>(42)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x123.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Setting</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1154"><label>(42a)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x124.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>So,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1155"><label>(43)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x125.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Solving (42a), we have respectively</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1156"><label>(44)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x126.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1157"><label>(45)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x127.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1158"><label>(46)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x128.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting (44), (45) and (46) into (43)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1159"><label>(47)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x129.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting (47) into (41) yields</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1160"><label>(48)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x130.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Taking the double Mellin transform of (48), we have that</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1161"><label>(49)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x131.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The inverse double Mellin transform of (37) is given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1162"><label>(50)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x132.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting (40) and (49) into (50)</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1163"><label>(51)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x133.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x134.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the Beta function of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x134.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x135.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x134.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x135.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x136.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p><p>Remarks</p><p>・ The integral equation for the price of European put option on a basket of two stocks with dividend yield can be obtained directly from the price of its counterpart, the American put option on a basket of two stocks. Hence, (51) can be written as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1164"><label>(52)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x137.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>・ The second term in (51) is called early exercise premium.</p><p>・ For the case of non-dividend yield, (51) becomes</p><disp-formula id="scirp.56259-formula1165"><label>(53)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/6-7402712x138.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>In this paper, we have considered vanilla basket put options, namely, European and American put options on a basket of two stocks with dividend yield. We used the integral method based on the double Mellin transform to derive the integral representations for the price of European and American put options on a basket of two-divi- dend paying stocks. We deduce from our results that by the decomposition of the price of American put option on a basket of two stocks, its counterpart “European put option” can be obtained directly as shown in (52).</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.56259-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Black, F. and Scholes, M. (1973) The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637-654.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/260062</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56259-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Merton, R.C. (1973) Theory of Rational Option Pricing. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4, 141-183.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3003143</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56259-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Panini, R. and Srivastav, R.P. (2004) Option Pricing with Mellin Transforms. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 40, 43-56.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2004.07.008</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56259-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Manuge, D.J. and Kim, P.T. (2015) Basket Option Pricing Using Mellin Transforms. Mathematical Finance Letter, 1, 1-9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56259-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">AlAzemi, F., AlAzemi, A. and Boyadjiev, I. (2014) Mellin Transform Method for Solving the Black-Scholes Equation. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 97, 287-301.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.12732/ijpam.v97i3.3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56259-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boyle, P.P., Evnine, J. and Gibbs, S. (1989) Numerical Evaluation of Multivariate Contingent Claims. Review of Financial Studies, 2, 241-250.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rfs/2.2.241</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56259-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fadugba, S.E. (2014) The Mellin Transforms Method as an Alternative Analytic Solution for the Valuation of Geometric Asian Option. Applied and Computational Mathematics, Special Issue: Computational Finance, 3, 1-7. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.11648/j.acm.s.20140301.11</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56259-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Frontczak, R. and Scho ?bel, R. (2009) On Modified Mellin Transforms, Gauss-Laguerre Quadrature and the Valuation of American Call Options. Working Paper, Tubinger Diskussionsbeitrag, No. 320. </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56259-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Huynh</surname><given-names> C.B. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1994</year>)<article-title>Back to Baskets</article-title><source> Risk</source><volume> 5</volume>,<fpage> 59</fpage>-<lpage>61</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56259-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sneddon, I.N. (1972) The Use of Integral Transforms. McGraw-Hill, New York.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56259-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Turnbull, S.M. and Wakeman, L.M. (1991) A Quick Algorithm for Pricing European Average Options. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 26, 377-389.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2331213</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.56259-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nwozo, C.R. and Fadugba, S.E. (2014) Mellin Transform Method for the Valuation of Some Vanilla Power Options with Non-Dividend Yield. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 96, 79-104.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.12732/ijpam.v96i1.7</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>