<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">GEP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4336</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/gep.2015.32006</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">GEP-55205</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Effect of Alkali Treatment on Heavy Metals Adsorption Capacity of Sewage Sludge
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jianlong</surname><given-names>Hu</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xiaosong</surname><given-names>Yang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Linan</surname><given-names>Shao</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Xuwen</surname><given-names>He</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kunkuo</surname><given-names>Men</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Beijing General Research Institute of Mining &amp;amp; Metallurgy, Beijing, China</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>hujianlwj@126.com(JH)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>01</day><month>04</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>33</fpage><lpage>39</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>December</day>	<month>2014</month></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   Sewage sludge is the promising raw material for biosorbent preparation. In this work, we evaluated the heavy metals adsorption characteristics of alkali treated sewage sludge (ATSS) by equilibrium studies. The adsorption isotherms were fitted with Langmuir and Freundlich models. Comparing with untreated sewage sludge, the total adsorption capacity (q<sub>m</sub>) of ATSS (prepared with 0.125 mol/L NaOH) for Cd, Pb, Ni, increased by 0.51, 0.70 and 0.32 mmol/g, respectively. When the NaOH concentration for ATSS preparation increased from 0.125 mol/L to 0.25 mol/L, the qm of ATSS for Pb decreased from 1.05 mmol/g to 0.84 mmol/g. However, when the NaOH concentration increased from 0.25 mol/L to 7.5 mol/L, it showed increasing trend. According to the IR spectra data, the adsorption effect of biosorbent for heavy metals was mainly due to the complexation of -N-H groups and -COOH groups. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Sewage Sludge</kwd><kwd> Alkali Treatment</kwd><kwd> Heavy Metals</kwd><kwd> Adsorption</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Sewage sludge is an unavoidable by-product of wastewater treatment plants. The costs associated with sludge treatment and disposal can reach 50% of wastewater treatment plants costs [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.55205-ref1">1</xref>]. Thus, techniques allowing sludge reduction and resource utilization are increasing studied. Many studies have shown that sewage sludge can adsorb substantial quantities of heavy metals in solution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.55205-ref2">2</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.55205-ref4">4</xref>]. The biosorbent prepared with sewage sludge can remove heavy metals from wastewater by complex mechanisms including surface complexation with negatively charged biopolymers, ion exchange and physical adsorption [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.55205-ref5">5</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.55205-ref7">7</xref>]. These mechanisms are influenced by biosorbent components and operational conditions: pH, temperature, hydraulic residence time [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.55205-ref8">8</xref>], sludge age [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.55205-ref9">9</xref>], feed C/N ratio [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.55205-ref10">10</xref>], dissolved organic matter [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.55205-ref11">11</xref>], etc.</p><p>One of the major problems limiting the real application of biosorbent is that its adsorption capacity for heavy metals is relative low. The heavy metal adsorption capacity of biosorbent made from sewage sludge ranges from 0.01 to 0.38 mmol/g [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.55205-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.55205-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.55205-ref12">12</xref>], it is lower than the commercial adsorbent [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.55205-ref13">13</xref>]. The relatively low adsorption capacity of biosorbent means that more biosorbent should be used in order to insure the removal efficiency of heavy metals in wastewater, and it may produce more wasted biosorbent loaded with heavy metals. Therefore, novel preparation method should be developed in order to improve the adsorption capacity of biosorbent.</p><p>The alkali treatment was previously studied as the pretreatment method for sewage sludge anaerobic digestion [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.55205-ref14">14</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.55205-ref15">15</xref>], it was proved to be an effective way to enhance the efficiency of biological hydrolysis of sewage sludge and increase methane production [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.55205-ref15">15</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.55205-ref17">17</xref>]. In addition, it was studied as extraction technique to recover useful organic material (protein, carbohydrates, etc) from sewage sludge [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.55205-ref18">18</xref>]-[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.55205-ref20">20</xref>]. The alkali treatment can destroy the cell walls of bacteria in sewage sludge leading to the solubilization of extracellular and intracellular materials into the aqueous phase. Thus, for sewage sludge, the alkali treatment is possible to enhance the heavy metal adsorption capacity by release of its intracellular complexation sites and chemical modification of function groups. However, to our best knowledge, the adsorption capacity of sewage sludge treated with alkali solution has not been studied. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the heavy metals adsorption capacity of alkali treated sewage sludge by equilibrium experiments. Furthermore, the effect of alkali concentration for treatment on adsorption capacity was evaluated as well.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2 Materials and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Materials</title><p>The sewage sludge was obtained from a municipal wastewater treatment plant in Beijing, China. The sewage sludge was collected after mechanical dewater treatment, stored in refrigerator at −18˚C before use. Main characteristics of sewage sludge are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Methods</title><sec id="s2_2_1"><title>2.2.1. Preparation of Alkali Treated Sewage Sludge</title><p>The alkali treated sewage sludge was prepared with NaOH solution of various concentration (range from 0.125 - 7.5 mol/L). Sewage sludge of 25.0 g (approximate dry weight 4.48 g) was added into conical flask containing 100 mL NaOH solution. The suspension was agitated on a shaker at 100 r/min at 35˚C for 12 h. Then, to remove soluble part, the mixture was centrifuged at 6000 &#215; g for 20 min. The solid after centrifugation was collected, added into deionized water and repeated the centrifugation process for twice in order to remove the dissolved impurities and residual NaOH. The final pellet left was suspended in deionized water, neutralized with nitric acid solution, diluted to 100 ml with deionized water, and stored at 4˚C before use. This suspension was the alkali treated sewage sludge used in this study.</p></sec><sec id="s2_2_2"><title>2.2.2. Adsorption Equilibrium Experiment</title><p>Heavy metal adsorption onto alkali treated sewage sludge was evaluated with three typical metals in wastewater: Cadmium (Cd<sup>2+</sup>), nickel (Ni<sup>2+</sup>), and lead (Pb<sup>2+</sup>). All stock solution containing heavy metal were prepared by dissolving heavy metal nitrate salts in deionized water. The pH of heavy metals working solution were adjusted to 5.0 using 0.1 mol/L NaOH solution and 0.1 mol/L nitric acid solution in order to prevent precipitation of heavy metals.</p><p>Equilibrium sorption experiments were conducted by adding 10 mL biosorbent to 90 ml heavy metal solution. The mixture was agitated on a rotary shaker at 150 rpm at 25˚C for 24 h. Then the mixture was centrifuged at 6000 &#215; g for 20 min, and the supernatant was filtered with cellulose nitrate membrane (0.45 μm pore size). The filtrate was acidified with concentrated nitric acid and stored at 4˚C before analysis. Blanks without biosorbent were run simultaneously as control. All experimental were run in triplicate. The heavy metals concentration were measured with inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES).</p><p>Adsorption experimental data were fitted to the models of Langmuir and Freundlich (Equations (1) and (2), respectively).</p><disp-formula id="scirp.55205-formula694"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/55205x4.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.55205-formula695"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/55205x5.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where C<sub>e</sub> (mmol/L) is the heavy metal ions concentration at equilibrium, q<sub>e</sub> (mmol/g) is the amount of adsorbed metal ions per unit dry weight of biosorbent, q<sub>m</sub> (mmol/g) is the total adsorption capacity of adsorbent. K<sub>L</sub>, K<sub>F</sub></p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Main characteristics of sewage sludge</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Property/element</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sewage Sludge</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dry matter (wt%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carbon (wt%<sup>d</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hydrogen (wt%<sup>d</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Oxygen (wt%<sup>d</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nitrogen (wt%<sup>d</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >P (wt%<sup>d</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sulfur (wt%<sup>d</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Calcium (wt%<sup>d</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Magnesium (wt%<sup>d</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>d</sup>represents dry weight element composition.</p><p>and n are the isotherm constants.</p><p>The adsorption capacity (q<sub>e</sub>) was calculated as Equation (3).</p><disp-formula id="scirp.55205-formula696"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/55205x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where C<sub>o</sub> (mmol∙L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) is the initial heavy metal concentration of working solution, C<sub>e</sub> (mmol∙L<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>) is the equilibrium concentration of heavy metal, V<sub>1</sub> (L) is the volume of working solution, V<sub>2</sub> (L) is the volume of biosorbent suspension, m (g) is the dry weight of biosorbent contained in biosorbent suspension. The value of m is measured for every kind of biosorbent suspension.</p></sec></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Adsorption Isotherms of Alkali Treated Sewage Sludge</title><p>Equilibrium sorption studies were performed to explore heavy metal adsorption capacity of the biosorbent. The adsorption isotherms for sewage sludge and alkali treated sewage sludge were shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, respectively; q<sub>e</sub> represented the amount of metal ion adsorbed per unit weight of biomass and C<sub>e</sub> represented the metal ion concentration remaining in solution at equilibrium.</p><p>The initial pH value was 5.0 for all working solutions in order to prevent precipitation of heavy metals, the pH was not controlled during the equilibrium experiment. The final pH of heavy metal working solution after adsorption was in the range of 5.9 - 6.3 (results are not given). According to previous study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.55205-ref22">22</xref>], at the pH range of 6, Pb<sup>2+</sup> accounts for about 98.6% of total lead, Cd<sup>2+</sup> and Ni<sup>2+</sup> accounts for 100% of total cadmium and total nickel, respectively. Thus, the precipitation of heavy metal ions can be neglected in the adsorption process.</p><p>For both alkali treated sewage sludge and sewage sludge, the Langmuir model yielded a little better fit than the Freundlich model (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>), and the good agreement with experimental data suggests that monolayer adsorption existed for the experiment, which is consistent with adsorption process between heavy metals and other biosorbent such as sugar beet pulp [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.55205-ref23">23</xref>], dried activated sludge [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.55205-ref24">24</xref>]. In addition, comparing with sewage sludge, the q<sub>m</sub> value of alkali treated sewage sludge for Cd, Pb, Ni, increased by 0.51, 0.70 and 0.32 mmol/g, respectively. The higher q<sub>m</sub> value of alkali treated sewage sludge indicates that the maximum heavy metal adsorption capacity of sewage sludge was significantly enhanced by alkali treatment.</p><p>For alkali treated sewage sludge, q<sub>m</sub> and K<sub>L</sub> values followed the order: Pb<sup>2+</sup> &gt; Cd<sup>2+</sup> &gt; Ni<sup>2+</sup>. This trend indicates the bonding affinity of alkali treated sewage sludge to heavy metals is in the order of Pb<sup>2+</sup> &gt; Cd<sup>2+</sup> &gt; Ni<sup>2+</sup>.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Effect of Alkali Concentration on Adsorption Capacity of Sewage Sludge</title><p>The alkali treatment can significantly enhance the heavy metal adsorption capacity of sewage sludge, and the</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Heavy metals biosorption isotherms for sewage sludge. Date points are the average of triplicate bottles and the error bars represent standard deviation</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/55205x7.png"/></fig><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Heavy metals biosorption isotherms for alkali treated sewage sludge (prepared with 0.125 mol/L NaOH). Date points are the average of triplicate bottles and the error bars represent standard deviation</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/55205x8.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Heavy metals adsorption isotherms parameters for sewage sludge prior to and after alkali treatment (prepared with 0.125 mol/L NaOH)</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Langmuir model</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Freundlich model</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >adsorbent</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >adsorbate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >q<sub>m</sub> (mmol∙g<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>L</sub> (L∙mmol<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>F</sub> (mmol∙L<sup>−1/n</sup>∙L<sup>1/n</sup>∙g<sup>−1</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"   rowspan="3"  >Sewage sludge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cd<sup>2+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.986</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.962</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pb<sup>2+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.982</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.936</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni<sup>2+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.991</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.984</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"   rowspan="3"  >Alkali treated sludge</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cd<sup>2+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.993</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.947</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pb<sup>2+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.970</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.929</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni<sup>2+</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.992</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.990</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>effect of NaOH concentration for alkali treatment on lead adsorption capacity was studied, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>.</p><p>For all biosorbent prepared with different NaOH solution, the equilibrium data were well described with Langmuir model as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>, which was consistent with previous study. The principal components in sewage sludge are polysaccharides and proteins. Alkali treatment (mainly NaOH) is an effective carbohydrate and protein extraction method. NaOH ionizes charged groups in proteins and polysaccharides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.55205-ref18">18</xref>]. The ionized functional groups of protein and polysaccharides, such as amino group, hydroxyl group, carboxyl group, complexes with heavy metals. Thus, comparing with sewage sludge before treatment, the q<sub>m</sub> value of treated sewage sludge prepared by 0.125 mol/L NaOH solution increased by 0.7 mmol/g. However, when the NaOH concentration increased from 0.125 mol/L to 0.25 mol/L, the q<sub>m</sub> of biosorbent decreased from 1.05 mmol/g to 0.84 mmol/g. This trend may be due to that the NaOH solution with higher concentration hydrolyzed and disintegrated part of protein and polysaccharides in treated sewage sludge [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.55205-ref25">25</xref>]. Nevertheless, when the NaOH concentration continued to increase from 0.25 mol/L to 7.5 mol/L, the q<sub>m</sub> values of treated sewage sludge showed increasing trend. This increasing trend indicates that the NaOH solution with higher concentration leads to the hydrolysis of bacteria cell of sewage sludge [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.55205-ref26">26</xref>]. Then, more intracellular complexation sites expose to heavy metals.</p></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Functional Groups Analysis</title><p>The IR spectra obtained from sewage sludge prior to and after alkali treatment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>) were used to analysis the presence of main adsorption functional groups. For alkali treated sewage sludge prior to lead adsorption, the peak at 1657 cm<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> was attributed to the stretching vibration of C=O and C-N groups. The peak at 1562 cm<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> was due to the N-H bending vibration and C-N stretching vibration. These groups above were the characteristics spectra of protein. The peak at 1416 cm<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> was assigned to the stretching vibration of C=O and deformation vibration of OH. The peak at 1014 cm<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> was attributed to the stretching vibration of OH.</p><p>Comparing with the IR spectra of alkali treated sewage sludge prior to and after Pb<sup>2+</sup> adsorption, the peak shapes were similar, and no new adsorption peak was observed. It indicated that the material structure did not change after Pb<sup>2+</sup> adsorption. After Pb<sup>2+</sup> adsorption, the peak at 1570 cm<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> was moved for 20 cm<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> toward infra-</p><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Adsorption isotherms of Pb<sup>2+</sup> for biosorbent treated with NaOH solution of different concentration</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/55205x9.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Pb<sup>2+</sup> adsorption isotherms parameters for various alkali treated biosorbent</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Langmuir model</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Freundlich model</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >adsorbate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >qm (mmol∙g<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >KL (L∙mmol<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >n</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>F</sub> (mmol∙L<sup>(1−1/n)</sup>∙g<sup>−1</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.125 mol/L NaOH treated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.970</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.929</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25 mol/L NaOH treated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.986</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.927</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5 mol/L NaOH treated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.983</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.917</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5 mol/L NaOH treated</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.981</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.932</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> IR spectra of untreated sewage sludge and alkali treated sewage sludge</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/55205x10.png"/></fig><p>red region, it was due to the complexation of Pb<sup>2+</sup> and N-H group. In addition, the peak at 1408 cm<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> was moved for 32 cm<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> toward infrared region, it was due to Pb<sup>2+</sup> binding with -COOH group. Thus, the main function groups works in the heavy metal adsorption process was N-H group and COOH group. These IR spectra data were similar to results of various activated samples obtained by Laurent et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.55205-ref12">12</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.55205-ref21">21</xref>].</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>The alkali treatment is an effective biosorbent preparation method to improve the maximum adsorption capacity of sewage sludge. The alkali treated sewage sludge achieved 1.6 - 2 fold higher adsorption capacity than untreated sewage sludge. The bonding affinity of alkali treated sewage sludge to heavy metals was in the order of Pb<sup>2+</sup> &gt; Cd<sup>2+</sup> &gt; Ni<sup>2+</sup>. The increase of heavy metal adsorption capacity was due to the complexation effect of more ionized functional groups formed in the alkali treatment. Furthermore, the alkali treatment leads to hydrolysis of bacteria cell of sewage sludge, and make more intracellular complexation sites expose to heavy metals. Further work is being conducted to determine the suitable operational conditions for usage of alkali treated sewage sludge.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China project 51404028 and Beijing General Research Institute of Mining &amp; Metallurgy Research Foundation project YJ-2014-17.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Jianlong Hu,Xiaosong Yang,Linan Shao,Xuwen He,Kunkuo Men, (2015) Effect of Alkali Treatment on Heavy Metals Adsorption Capacity of Sewage Sludge. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection,03,33-39. doi: 10.4236/gep.2015.32006</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.55205-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Apples, L., Baeyens, J., Degreve, J. and Dewil, R. (2008) Principles and Potential of the Anaerobic Digestion of Waste-Activated Sludge. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 34, 755-781.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2008.06.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.55205-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brown, M.J. and Lester, J.N. (1980) Comparison of Bacterial Extracellular Polymer Extraction Methods. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 40, 179-185.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.55205-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">McSwain, B.S., Irvine, R.L., Hausner, M. and Wilderer, P.A. (2005) Composition and Distribution of Extracellular Polymeric Substances in Aerobic Flocs and Granular Sludge. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 71, 1051-1057.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.2.1051-1057.2005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.55205-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, X.J., Xia, S.Q., Chen, L., Zhao, J.F., Chovelon, J.M. and Nicole, J.R. (2006) Biosorption of Cadmium(II) and Lead(II) Ions from Aqueous Solutions onto Dried Activated Sludge. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 18, 840-844.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.55205-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Reddad, Z.C., Gerente, C., Aandres, Y. and Cloirec, P.L. (2002) Adsorption of Several Metal Ions onto a Low-Cost Biosorbent: Kinetic and Equilibrium Studies. Environmental Science &amp; Technology, 36, 2067-2073.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es0102989</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.55205-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Comte, S., Guibaud, G. and Baudu, M. (2008) Biosorption Properties of Extracellular Polymeric Substances (EPS) towards Cd, Cu and Pb for Different pH Values. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 151, 185-193.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.05.070</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.55205-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Laurent, J., Pieera, M., Caasellas, M. and Dagot, C. (2009) Fate of Cadmium in Activated Sludge after Changing Its Physicochemical Properties by Thermal Treatment. Chemosphere, 77, 771-777.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.08.024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.55205-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sheeng, G. and Yu, Z. (2005) Extraction of Extracellular Polymeric Substances from the Photosynthetic Bacterium Rhodopseudomonas acidophila. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 67, 125-130.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00253-004-1704-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.55205-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Liu, H. and Fang, H.H.P. (2002) Extraction of Extracellular Polymeric Substances(EPS) of Sludge. Journal of Biotechnology, 95, 249-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1656(02)00025-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.55205-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Garcia Becerra, F.Y., Acosta, E.J. and Grant Allen, D. (2010) Alkaline Extraction of Wastewater Activated Sludge Biosolids. Bioresource Technology, 101, 6972-6980. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.04.021</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.55205-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lin, J.G., Ma, Y.S. and Huang, C.C. (1998) Alkaline Hydrolysis of the Sludge Generated from a High-Strength, Nitrogenous-Wastewater Biological-Treatment Process. Bioresource Technology, 65, 35-42.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(98)00028-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.55205-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wilson, C.A. and Novak, J.T. (2009) Hydrolysis of Macromolecular Components of Primary and Secondary Wastewater Sludge by Thermal Hydrolytic Pretreatment. Water Research, 43, 4489-4498.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.07.022</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.55205-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dogan, I. and Dilek Sanin, F. (2009) Alkaline Solubilization and Microwave Irradiation as a Combined Sludge Disintegration and Minimization Method. Water Research, 43, 2139-2148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.02.023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.55205-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, H., Jin, Y.Y., Mahar, R.B., Wang, Z.Y. and Nie, Y.F. (2008) Effects and Model of Alkaline Waste Activated Sludge Treatment. Bioresource Technology, 99, 5140-5144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.09.019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.55205-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vaughan, T., Seo, C.W. and Marshall, W.E. (2001) Removal of Selected Metal Ions from Aqueous Solution Using Treated Corncobs. Bioresource Technology, 78, 133-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00007-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.55205-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Laurent, J., Casellas, M., Carrere, H. and Dagot, C. (2011) Effect of Thermal Hydrolysis on Activated Sludge Solubilization, Surface Properties and Heavy Metals Biosorption. Chemi-cal Engineering Journal, 166, 842-849.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.11.054</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.55205-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, J., Huang, C.P., Allen, H.E., Poesponegoro, I., Poesponegoro, H. and Takiyama, L.R. (1999) Effects of Dissolved Organic Matter and pH on Heavy Metal Uptake by Sludge Particulates Exemplified by Copper(II) and Nickel(II): Three-Variable Model. Water Environment Research, 71, 139-147.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.2175/106143099X121517</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.55205-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yuncu, B., Sanin, F.D. and Yetis, U. (2006) An Investigation of Heavy Metal Biosorption in Relation to C/N Ratio of Activated Sludge. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 137, 990-997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.03.020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.55205-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Arican, B., Gokcay, C.F. and Yetis, U. (2002) Mechanistics of Nickel Sorption by Activated Sludge. Process Biochemistry, 37, 1307-1315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00015-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.55205-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">?zbelge, T.A., ?zbelge, H.A. and Tursun, M. (2005) Effects of Hydraulic Residence Time on Metal Uptake by Activated Sludge. Chemical Engineering and Processing, 44, 23-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2004.04.004 </mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.55205-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Laurent, J., Casellas, M. and Dagot, C. (2009) Heavy Metals Uptake by Sonicated Activated Sludge: Relation with Floc Surface Properties. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 162, 652-660.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.066</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.55205-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kim, D.W., Cha, D.K., Wang, J. and Huang, C.P. (2002) Heavy Metal Removal by Activated Sludge: Influence of Nocardia amarae. Chemosphere, 46, 137-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00598-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.55205-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Veglio, F. and Beolchini, F. (1997) Removal of Metals by Biosorption: A Review. Hydrometallurgy, 44, 301-316.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-386X(96)00059-X</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.55205-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Otero, M., Rozada, F., Morán, A., Calvo, L.F. and García, A.I. (2009) Removal of Heavy Metals from Aqueous Solution by Sewage Sludge Based Sorbents: Competitive Effects. Desalination, 239, 46-57.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.03.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.55205-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gascó, G., Méndez, A. and Gascó, J.M. (2005) Preparation of Carbon-Based Adsorbents from Sewage Sludge Pyrolysis to Remove Metals from Water. Desalination, 180, 245-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.01.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.55205-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, W.H., Yue, Q.Y., Gao, B.Y., Wang, X.J., Qi, Y.F., Zhao, Y.Q. and Li, Y.J. (2011) Preparation of Sludge-Based Activated Carbon Made from Paper Mill Sewage Sludge by Steam Activation for Dye Wastewater Treatment. Desalination, 278, 179-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.05.020</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>