<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2015.65074</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-54841</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Nutritional Status and Total Phenols of Passiflora Genotypes Related to Nitrogen Fertilization
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>enata</surname><given-names>Vianna Lima</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Almy</surname><given-names>Junior Cordeiro de Carvalho</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Paulo</surname><given-names>Cesar Santos</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jalille</surname><given-names>Amim Altoé Freitas</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mírian</surname><given-names>Peixoto Soares da Silva</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Silvio</surname><given-names>de Jesus Freitas</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Marta</surname><given-names>Simone Mendonça Freitas</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, Campos dos Goytacazes, Brazil</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>renataviannalima2005@yahoo.com.br(EVL)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>11</day><month>03</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>685</fpage><lpage>692</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>19</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>17</month>	<year>March</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>19</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  This paper was developed in order to verify the influence of nitrogen fertilization and different genotypes in the nutritional aspect and in the production of total phenols in passifloraceae. The experimental design was randomized blocks in a 5 &#215; 2 &#215; 2 factorial scheme, being five genotypes of 
  
  Passiflora (three genotypes of 
  
  Passiflora edulis, a genotype of 
  
  Passiflora alata and a genotype of 
  
  Passiflora ligularis), two levels of cow manure (with and without) and two doses of N (20 and 80 g), with four replicates. At 120 days after sowing, levels of foliar nutrient and total phenols were determined. Foliar N content varied depending on N doses, organic fertilization and the genotypes used. Foliar levels of P and K were higher when all genotypes received organic fertilization, while the levels of Fe and Mn were similar regardless of this fertilization. The levels of Ca and Mg were higher related to organic fertilization and the genotypes, in isolation. But the foliar contents of S, Zn and Cu increased only in relation to the used genotypes, and the average foliar content of total phenols found was 19.4 g
  &#183;kg
  <sup>-1</sup>, ranging from 13.1 to 23.2 g
  &#183;kg
  <sup>-1</sup>, being the lowest value observed in 
  
  Passiflora alata without fertilization with cow manure. It is concluded that the nutritional requirement for N is greater for genotypes of the species 
  
  Passiflora edulis in relation to the species 
  
  Passiflora alata and 
  
  Passiflora ligulares, and that the organic fertilization influences positively in the production of total phenols only for the genotype of sweet passion fruit.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Fertilization</kwd><kwd> Nitrogen</kwd><kwd> Secondary Metabolites</kwd><kwd> Nutrients</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Passion fruit is a fruit species of great economic importance, being consumed both in the fresh and processed forms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref1">1</xref>] , in addition to presenting potential for extraction of secondary metabolites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref2">2</xref>] , as total phenols, which have antioxidant properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref3">3</xref>] . Although these compounds are genetically controlled, their quality and quantity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref4">4</xref>] can be influenced by several factors; the plant nutrition is among them [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref4">4</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>Fertilizer practice requires knowledge of the plant morphophysiological characteristics and soil nutrient availability to their effect in the plant, and the nutrients can be provided through organic and mineral fertilization [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref8">8</xref>] .</p><p>Among the nutrients provided via fertilization, nitrogen is the one which deserves attention because it takes part in many compounds considered indispensable for the growth and development of plants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref9">9</xref>] . For yellow passion fruit, nitrogen is one of the most required nutrients [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref7">7</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref10">10</xref>] and as verified by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref6">6</xref>] , in sweet passion fruit, its deficiency causes a variety of symptoms, even in fruits, bringing huge economic losses.</p><p>Studies have reported the effects of nitrogen fertilization on improving the quality of yellow passion fruit, such as reduction of the skin diameter and increase of soluble solids [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref11">11</xref>] . At the same time, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref12">12</xref>] reported that organic fertilization has provided an increase on average weight of yellow passion fruits similar to plants subjected to conventional chemical fertilization.</p><p>However, the nitrogenous sources and cow manure fertilizations for species P. alata and P. ligularis are still unknown, mainly with respect to mineral nutrition and phenolic compounds production, being used as a parameter―the recommendation of P. edulis.</p><p>In this sense, the objective of this work was to verify the influence of mineral and organic nitrogen fertilization on mineral composition and total phenols production of five Passiflora genotypes.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material &amp; Methods</title><p>The experiment was conducted in the area of the experimental station of the Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro (UENF), in the municipality of Campos dos Goytacazes-RJ (May-September, 2008), at an elevation of 11 m above sea level (21˚15'45''South and 41˚19'28''West). During the experiment period, monthly minimum temperature ranged from 16.1˚C to 19.9˚C, the average temperature was 18.3˚C and the maximum monthly temperature ranged from 27.3˚C to 29.2˚C with an average of 28.2˚C and the precipitation ranged from 3.5 to 63.8 mm.</p><p>The experimental design was a randomized complete block in a 5 &#215; 2 &#215; 2 factorial scheme, being five genotypes of Passiflora [three genotypes of Passiflora edulis (passion fruit grown, Progeny 0304 and Progeny 2904), a genotype of Passiflora alata and a genotype of Passiflora ligularis], two types of organic fertilization (presence and absence of cow manure in the substrate) and two nitrogen doses (20 and 80 g・box<sup>−1</sup>) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref13">13</xref>] provided in the form of urea, with four replicates and four plants per plot.</p><p>Yellow passion fruit seeds (P. edulis) improved from two progenies of half-brothers (0304 and 2904) acquired from the germoplasm bank of UENF and seeds of passion fruit grown in the region were used. While, sweet passion fruit seeds (P. alata) and seeds of Granadilla passion fruit (P. ligularis), were obtained from fruits of commercial lots.</p><p>The seeds of the Passiflora genotypes have been extracted from fruits and placed to germinate in boxes of 55 cm long, 37 cm wide and 30 cm high, which were filled with two substrates according to treatments. The first substrate was composed of a mixture of soil, sand and cow manure (1:1:1-v/v) and the second substrate was composed of a mixture of soil and sand (1:1-v/v). Chemical analysis of substrates was performed at the experiment deployment phase and presented the following features (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>).</p><p>Fifteen seeds of each genotype of Passiflora were seeded directly in cultivation boxes ( 55 cm long, 37 cm wide and 30 cm high). After germination, the thinning was carried out leaving only two plants per box.</p><p>The plants were conducted in the open in a vertical trellis system, with a wire, 2 m height above ground level, with fence posts spacing of 6 m , adopting the curtain system. For this, two target pruning of branches were performed, the first was carried out when the plant has reached 15 cm above the wire (primary branch pruning), when the branches were forced to develop laterally in opposite directions and fixed in a horizontal position the direction of the wires, and the second pruning was carried out when secondary branches of the plants were had reached one another.</p><p>Sixty days after seeds germination, nitrogen fertilization began, and the doses of each treatment were splitted</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Chemical analysis of substrates performed at the experiment deployment phase</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Substratum</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >pH</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >P</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >K</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ca</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Mg</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Al</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >H + Al</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Na</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >(H<sub>2</sub>O)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >(mg∙dm<sup>−3</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="7"  >(mmolc∙dm<sup>−3</sup>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >114</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >34</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >12.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Substratum</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >MO</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >CTC</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >SB</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >S-SO<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >(g∙dm<sup>−3</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >(mmolc∙dm<sup>−3</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >(mg∙dm<sup>−3</sup>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >125.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >279.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.72</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.26</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Substratum</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Mn</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >B</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="9"  >(mg∙dm<sup>−3</sup>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >25.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >0.69</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >15.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >0.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>monthly, totaling 10 applications.</p><p>At 120 days after sowing, a plant per box of each treatment was collected. Then the leaves were separated from plants, and they were put to dry in an oven with forced air circulation at 70˚C for 72 hours. Subsequently, the levels of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), sulfur (S), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), iron (Fe) and manganese (Mn) were determined.</p><p>Plant material was subjected to oxidation by sulfuric digestion in order to determine the levels of N, P and K. N was determined by Nessler method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref14">14</xref>] , P by molybdate colorimetric method and K by flame emission spectrophotometry (spectrometry). Plant material has undergone nitric-perchloric acid digestion for determining the levels of Ca, Mg, S, Cu, Zn, Fe and Mn. The Ca, Mg, Cu, Zn, Fe and Mn were quantified by atomic absorption spectrometry and the S by turbidimetry with barium chloride.</p><p>The total phenols (soluble phenols, condensed and hydrolysable tannins, and non-tannin phenols) have been determined by the Folin-Denis method, in basic medium, from a sample of 0.75 g of plant material mixed with 20 mL of methanol 50%, kept at a temperature of 80˚C for one hour, using tannic acid as standard, as described by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref15">15</xref>] .</p><p>The data were subjected to analysis of variance through F test and the averages were compared by Tukey test (P &lt; 0.05).</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results &amp; Discussions</title><p>It was observed that only the genotype of Granadilla showed lower N content in the leaves, when grown in substrate fertilized with cow manure and with 20 g N. This genotype obtained foliar N content similar to other genotypes (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>) when a dose of 80 g N was applied and independently of manure application.</p><p>The lack of response to organic fertilization may be associated with the slow mineralization process in the plants. On the other hand, according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref16">16</xref>] , the certain amount of N quickly released in the initial stage of crop waste decomposition would be associated with the loss of fractions of this water-soluble nutrient.</p><p>The genotypes of the species P. edulis grown on substrate without cow manure and adding a dose of 80 g N presented greater N contents in foliar dry matter. While, the species P. alata and P. ligularis showed average levels 16.6% and 33.0% lower, respectively, in relation to genotype of cultivated passion fruit (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>).</p><p>Most of the works have compared the mineral composition of the species P. alata and P. ligularis with the species P. edulis, because for this last species there is already the optimal range for nutritional levels. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref10">10</xref>] , at 127 days after sowing P. edulis, observed the average foliar content of 49.9 g∙kg<sup>−1</sup> N. However, it was observed in this work that the genotypes of the species P. alata and P. ligularis are less N demanding, since there was no increment in foliar levels of this nutrient even with increased dose of N, which therefore, can reduce the use of nitrogen fertilization.</p><p>Granadilla genotype presented the lowest P content (1.06 g∙kg<sup>−1</sup>) in leaf dry mass when grown on a substrate</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Nitrogen content in the leaves of genotypes of passion fruit, according to nitrogen (N) doses, grown with or without cow manure, at 120 days after sowing</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Genotypes of passion fruit</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >Nitrogen (g∙kg<sup>−1</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >20 g・N・box<sup>−1</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >80 g・N・box<sup>−1</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Average</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Without manure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >With manure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Without manure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >With manure</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cultivated passion fruit</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.7Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.7Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.5Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.5Ba</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >47.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Progeny 0304</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.8Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.3Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.0Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.7Bab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Progeny 2904</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.1Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.6Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >52.2Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.4Bb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sweet passion fruit</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.1Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >32.8Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.1Ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.9Bb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Granadilla</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.1Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.4Ba</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.8Ac</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.9Ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >33.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >34.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >46.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C.V. (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="6"  >10.7</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>C.V. = Coefficient of variation; the averages followed by the same uppercase letter in the column and lowercase letter on the line, do not differ significantly based on the Tukey test (p &lt; 0.05).</p><p>without addition of cow manure. While the genotypes cultivated passion fruit and sweet passion fruit presented higher P contents in leaf dry mass when they received fertilizing with cow manure. The application of cow manure incremented leaf P levels of all genotypes except the Progeny 2904 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>Carvalho [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref13">13</xref>] have defined that the optimal P contents for the species P. edulis are in the range from 2.31 to 3.85 g∙kg<sup>−1</sup>. Moraes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref17">17</xref>] obtained, for the same species, at 145 days after planting in the field, levels ranging from 2.14 to 3.01 g∙kg<sup>−1</sup>. Considering these ranges, it is suggested that P content obtained in this experiment for this species is not in the proper range (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>Genotypes of Granadilla and cultivated passion fruit showed higher foliar K levels compared to other genotypes, when they were not fertilized with cow manure. On the other hand, when cow manure was added to the substrate, it was found that the genotypes of cultivated passion fruit, Progeny 0304, Progeny 2904 and sweet passion fruit presented increments of 92.0%; 121.8%; 72.8% and 77.6%, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>Although the addition of cow manure to cultivation substrate has increased the levels of K in leaf dry mass, these are still below those described by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref10">10</xref>] and by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref17">17</xref>] . According to the authors, the ranges for K in leaf dry mass are 34.8 - 37.5 and 33.5 - 38.7 g∙kg<sup>−1</sup>, respectively, for the species P. edulis.</p><p>Average levels of K were also smaller than those found by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref7">7</xref>] at 75 days when assessing the species P. alata and P. ligularis, which showed the levels of 23.2 and 25.7 g∙kg<sup>−1</sup>, respectively, even when cow manure was applied.</p><p>Rosolem [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref18">18</xref>] reported that K and other nutrients, regardless of organic matter decomposition, can be intensively leached from the soil profile, being subject to rainfall intensity, quantity applied of nutrient and soil texture. Thus, the rainy condition found during the evaluation phase of this work may have favored the leaching of K and impaired its absorption by plants.</p><p>Progeny 2904 presented greater foliar Ca content in relation to the genotype of sweet passion fruit (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). Foliar Ca levels were the same for all tested genotypes of P. edulis and these were higher than the contents of this element found in other studies by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref19">19</xref>] , by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref13">13</xref>] and by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref17">17</xref>] . On the other hand, these results agree with those found by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref10">10</xref>] , when they evaluated the initial growth of P. edulis.</p><p>For plants of the species P. ligularis, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref7">7</xref>] verified that these, when grown in the presence of cow manure, showed levels of foliar Ca of 11.9 g∙kg<sup>−1</sup>, at 77 days after transplanting.</p><p>It was found that Mg content in the leaves of the genotype Granadilla was 20% higher than the leaf content found in the cultivated passion fruit (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). On the other hand, the genotype Granadilla presented the lowest S content (1.55 g∙kg<sup>−1</sup>) in leaf dry mass in relation to other genotypes (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). This value is less than the content of S observed by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref7">7</xref>] in plants of P. ligularis at 77 days after transplanting.</p><p>The genotypes of Passiflora when fertilized with cow manure presented an increase of 25% and 21.8% in levels of foliar Ca and Mg, respectively, in comparison with the genotypes non-fertilized with cow manure (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>). The largest accumulations of these nutrients were observed when cow manure was applied on substrate,</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Phosphorus and potassium contents in leaves of genotypes of passion fruit grown with or without cow manure, at 120 days after sowing</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Genotypes of passion fruit</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Phosphorus (g∙kg<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Average</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Potassium (g∙kg<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Average</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Without manure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >With manure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Without manure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >With manure</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cultivated passion fruit</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.77Ba</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.24Aab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.6Bab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.2Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Progeny 0304</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.64Ba</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.20Ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.6Bb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.3Aab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Progeny 2904</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.85Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.11Ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.3Bb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.8Ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sweet passion fruit</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.66Ba</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.70Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.4Bb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.7Ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Granadilla</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.06Bb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.00Ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.6Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.4Ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.60</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C.V. (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >17.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >23.2</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>C.V. = Coefficient of variation; the averages followed by the same uppercase letter in the column and lowercase letter on the line, do not differ significantly based on the Tukey test (p &lt; 0.05).</p><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Foliar levels of calcium, magnesium, sulfur, zinc and copper related to genotypes of passion fruit, at 120 days after sowing, regardless of the nitrogen treatments</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Genotypes of passion fruit</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Calcium (g∙kg<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Magnesium (g∙kg<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sulfur (g∙kg<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Zinc (mg∙kg<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Copper (mg∙kg<sup>−1</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cultivated passion fruit</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.2ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.39b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.34a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.1ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.04a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Progeny 0304</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.6ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.78ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.33a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25.5bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.86ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Progeny 2904</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.4a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.62ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.47a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.8a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.24ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sweet passion fruit</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.0b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.03ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.21a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.7c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.41ab</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Granadilla</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.9ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.89a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.55b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.9c</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.61b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C.V. (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.7</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>C.V. = Coefficient of variation; the averages followed by the same uppercase letter in the column, do not differ from each other, based on the Tukey test (p &lt; 0.05).</p><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Levels of calcium, magnesium, sulfur, zinc and copper in the leaves of passion fruit grown with or without cow manure, at 120 days after sowing</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cow manure</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Calcium (g∙kg<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Magnesium (g∙kg<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sulfur (g∙kg<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Zinc (mg∙kg<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Copper (mg∙kg<sup>−1</sup>)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >With</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.0b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.16b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.27a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.5a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.11a</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Without</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.0a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.72a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.09a</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.1b</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.35b</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CV (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >30.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.7</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>C.V. = Coefficient of variation; the averages followed by the same uppercase letter in the column, do not differ from each other, based on the Tukey test (p &lt; 0.05).</p><p>which, in this case, might be considered a good source of these nutrients for the plants.</p><p>There are few papers in the scientific literature reporting levels of micronutrients suitable for passion fruit, notably for the P. alata and P. ligularis. According to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref20">20</xref>] the appropriate levels of Zn, Fe and Mn in leaf dry matter are 22.0; 116.0 and 80.0 mg∙kg<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. In this sense, the comparison of micronutrient levels of species such as P. alata and P. ligularis with genotypes of P. edulis can lead to an incorrect interpretation of the nutritional status of these crops.</p><p>For Zn, the foliar content regarded as suitable is 45 - 80 mg∙kg<sup>−1</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref21">21</xref>] . Larger values of this nutrient were observed for the genotypes on the substrate without the addition of cow manure, and despite being higher than the levels for the genotypes on the substrate with addition of cow manure (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>), the values are below the minimum limit value for the crop, according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref21">21</xref>] . While the genotypes, Progeny 2904 and cultivated passion fruit, presented the greatest foliar Zn levels (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>).</p><p>The genotype Granadilla on the substrate that did not contain cow manure presented levels of foliar Fe well above those of other genotypes (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>). The levels of this micronutrient found in this research are well above those considered suitable for this crop, which, according to [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref21">21</xref>] , are between 100 - 200 mg∙kg<sup>−1</sup>.</p><p>Whereas the appropriate range of Mn is between 50 - 200 mg∙kg<sup>−1</sup> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref21">21</xref>] , it is verified that sweet passion fruit fertilized with cow manure showed foliar content below the minimum level considered suitable for this crop. While the greatest foliar levels were found for Progeny 2904 and cultivated passion fruit, followed by Progeny 0304 on substrate that did not contain cow manure (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>).</p><p>The highest foliar Mn levels found for the genotypes on the substrate without cow manure (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>) may be associated with a possible reduction of the substrate pH, which was lower when compared to the pH of the substrate with cow manure, being responsible for the increased solubility of Mn in the medium.</p><p>The sweet passion fruit showed lower foliar content of total phenols (13.1 g∙kg<sup>−1</sup>) and at the same time showed lower K content compared to other genotypes, when cow manure was not applied (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>), being close to the average value of total phenols reported by [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref22">22</xref>] (11.5 g∙kg<sup>−1</sup>) who tested arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation and phosphorus doses for this genotype.</p><p>Gobbo-Neto [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref4">4</xref>] reported that variations in foliar K levels can interfere greater or lesser production of secondary metabolites, depending on the plant species and the type of pathway involved in the metabolite production</p><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Levels of iron and manganese in leaves of genotypes of passion fruit grown with or without cow manure, at 120 days after sowing</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Genotypes of passion fruit</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Iron (mg∙kg<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Average</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Manganese (mg∙kg<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Average</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Without manure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >With manure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Without manure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >With manure</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cultivated passion fruit</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >303Ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >275Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >289</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >199.0Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.5Bab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >131.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Progeny 0304</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >301Ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >286Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >293</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >192.6Aab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.3Bab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >129.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Progeny 2904</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >262Ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >277Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >269</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >205.7Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.3Bab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >136.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sweet passion fruit</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >250Ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >232Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >241</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >102.3Ac</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.7Bb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >69.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Granadilla</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >620Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >213Ba</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >416</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >148.3Abc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.5Ba</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >123.9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >347</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >256</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >302</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >169.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >118.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C.V. (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >26.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >28.0</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>C.V. = Coefficient of variation; the averages followed by the same uppercase letter in the column and lowercase letter on the line, do not differ significantly based on the Tukey test (p &lt; 0.05).</p><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Total phenols content in the leaves of genotypes of passion fruit grown with or without cow manure, at 120 days after sowing</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Genotypes of passion fruit</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >Total phenols (g∙kg<sup>−1</sup>)</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >Average</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Without manure</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >With manure</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cultivated passion fruit</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.2Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.3Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >21.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Progeny 0304</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.5Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.1Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Progeny 2904</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.0Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.5Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sweet passion fruit</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.1Bb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.8Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Granadilla</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.4Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.5Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C.V. (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >19.1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>C.V. = Coefficient of variation; the averages followed by the same uppercase letter in the column and lowercase letter on the line, do not differ significantly based on the Tukey test (p &lt; 0.05).</p><p>process. In the present study, the sweet passion fruit presented increments on total phenols levels and K when fertilized with cow manure (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>). Instead, [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54841-ref20">20</xref>] , working with K-deficient sweet passion fruit, observed higher levels of phenolic compound (vitexin) in relation to plants grown in complete nutrient solution.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>The leaf N content changed depending on the levels of N, organic manure and genotypes used; the contents of P and K were greater from the organic fertilizer in all genotypes.</p><p>Nutritional requirement for nitrogen is greater for genotypes of the P. edulis species in relation to P. alata and P. ligulares.</p><p>Organic fertilization positively influences total phenol production of sweet passion fruit genotype.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.54841-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Macoris, M.S., Janzantti, N.S., Garruti, D.S. and Monteiro, M. (2011) Volatile Compounds from Organic and Conventional Passion Fruit (Passiflora edulis F. var flavicarpa Deg.) Pulp. Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, 31, 430-435. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-20612011000200023</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54841-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oliveira, L.C., Santos, J.A.B., Narain, N., Fontes, A.S., Campos, R.S.S. and Souza, T.L. (2012) Characterization and Extraction of Volatile Compounds from Passion Fruit (Passiflora edulis Sims F. flavicarpa Degener) Processing Wast. Ciência Rural, 42, 2280-2287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782012005000103</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54841-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Vargas, P.N., Hoelzel, S.C. and Rosa, C.S.da. (2007) Determination of Total Polyphenols Content and Antioxidant Activity in Commercial Grape Juices. Alimentos e Nutri&amp;ccedil&amp;atildeo Araraquara, 19, 11-15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54841-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gobbo-Neto, L. and Lopes, N.P. (2007) Medicinal Plants: Factors of Influence on the Content of Secondary Metabolites. Química Nova, 30, 374-381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422007000200026</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54841-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Freitas, M.S.M., Monnerat, P.H., Vieira, I.J.C. and Carvalho, A.J.C.de. (2007) Flavonoids and Mineral Composition the Leaf in Yellow Passion Fruit Plant in Function of Leaves at Positions in the Branch. Ciência Rural, 37, 1634-1639. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782007000600020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54841-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Freitas, M.S.M., Monnerat, P.H., Carvalho, A.J.C.de. and Vasconcelos, M.A. (2011) Deficiency Symptoms of Macronutrientes and Boron in Sweet Passion Fruit Plant. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 33, 1329-1341.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-29452011000400034</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54841-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Souza, L.B., Heitor, L.C., Santos, P.C.dos., Freitas, J.A.A., Freitas, M.S.M.de., Freitas, S.de.J. and Carvalho, Al.J.C. (2013) Growth, Mineral Composition and Total Phenol of Passiflora Species as Affected by Nitrogen Sources. Bragantia, 72, 247-254.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54841-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cavalcante, L.F., Rodolfo Júnior, F., Beckmann-Cavalcante, M.Z. and Santos, G.P. (2012) Leaf-Macronutrient Status and Fruit Yield of Biofertilized Yellow Passion Fruit Plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 35, 176-191.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2012.636121</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54841-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Marschner, P. (2012) Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Elsevier, San Diego.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54841-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Santos, P.C., Lopes, L.C., Freitas, S.J., Sousa, L.B. and Carvalho, A.J.C. (2011) Initial Growth and Nutritional Content of Yellow Passion Fruit Subjected to Fertilization with Different Nitrogen Sources. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 33, 722-728. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-29452011000500101</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54841-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cavalcante, í.H.L., Cavalcante, L.F., Santos, G.D., Beckmann-Cavalcante, M.Z. and Silva, S.M. (2012) Impact of Biofertilizers on Mineral Status and Fruit Quality of Yellow Passion Fruit in Brazil. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 43, 2027-2042. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2012.693234</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54841-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pires, A.A., Monnerat, P.H., Pinho, L.G.R., Zampirolli, P.D., Rosa, R.C.C. and Muniz, R.A. (2009) Effects of Alternative Fertilization on Production Components of Yellow Passion Fruit. Acta Scientiarum Agronomy, 31, 655-660.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54841-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">de Carvalho, A.J.C., Monnerat, P.H., Martins, D.P., Bernardo, S. and da Silva, J.A. (2002) Leaf Nutrient Contents in Yellow Passionfruit in Response to Nitrogen Fertilization, Irrigation and Sampling Time. Scientia Agricola, 59, 121-127.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54841-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jackson, M.L. (1965) Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54841-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Anderson, J.D. and Ingram, J.S.I. (1996) Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility: A Handbook of Methods. CAB International, Wallingford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54841-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Aita, C. and Giacomini, S.J. (2003) Crop Residue Decomposition and Nitrogen Release in Single and Mixed Cover Crops. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 27, 601-612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832003000400004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54841-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moraes, J.C.B., Salcedo, I.H. and Sousa, V.F. (2011) Potassium Doses by Drip Irrigation in the Nutritional State of Yellow Passion Fruit. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 15, 763-770.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54841-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rosolem, C.A., dos Santos, F.P., Foloni, J.S.S. and Calonego, J.C. (2006) Soil Potassium as Affected by Fertilization over the Millet Straw and Simulated Rain. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 41, 1033-1040.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2006000600020</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54841-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">de Carvalho, A.J.C., Martins, D.P., Monnerat, P.H. and da Silva, J.A. (2001) Nutrients Contents in the Leaf Dry Matter Associated with Seasonal Phenology, Potassium Fertilization and Irrigation Depths in Yellow Passionfruit. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura, 23, 403-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-29452001000200041</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54841-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Freitas, M.S.M., Monnerat, P.H. and Vieira, I.J.C. (2008) Mineral Deficiency in Passiflora alata Curtis: Vitexin Bioproduction. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 31, 1844-1854. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01904160802325552</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54841-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">IFA—International Fertilizer Industry Association (1992) World Fertilizer Use Manual. BASF Agricultural Research Station, Limburgerhaf.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54841-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Netto, A.F.R., Freitas, M.S.M., Martins, M.A., de Carvalho, A.J.C. and Vitorazzi Filho, J.A. (2014) Total Phenols in Passiflora alata Curtis Inoculated with Mycorrhizal Fungi. Revista Brasileira de Plantas Medicinais, 16, 1-9.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>