<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JSS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Open Journal of Social Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-5952</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jss.2015.33009</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JSS-54763</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Business&amp;Economics</subject><subject> Social Sciences&amp;Humanities</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Research on Operation Cost-Benefits of China High-Speed Railway
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Qing</surname><given-names>Yang</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sub>1</sub></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><addr-line>School of Economics and Management, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang, China</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>576210082@qq.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>03</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>42</fpage><lpage>47</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>January</day>	<month>2015</month></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   At Present, to satisfy the demand of passengers travelling convenience, China’s High Speed Railway has entered an unprecedented rapid development period. Under this background, research on operation cost-benefits of china high-speed railway is most important and meaningful. The article concludes the following three parts. The first part is to give the definition of research scope. The second part is to give analysis and evaluation on opening and operation cost-benefits. This part is to give a detailed evaluation indexes system and FAHP calculation model; furthermore, to give an example to illustrate the application of evaluation indexes system and FAHP calculation model. The final part is to give effective suggestions and measures to improve cost-benefits of CRH. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>China High-Speed Railway</kwd><kwd> Operation Cost-Benefits</kwd><kwd> Evaluation Indexes</kwd><kwd> FAHP Calculation Model</kwd><kwd> Effective Measures</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>At Present, to satisfy the demand of passengers travelling convenience and saving time, Construction of High-Speed Railway to meet the market demand has become a new trend of railway development in China. According to the , by 2020, our country railway mileage will reach 12,000Km , electrification rate will reach 60%. In which, there will eventually form 30,000 high-speed passenger transportation network with newly built 16,000 Km four vertical and four horizontal passenger railway line and existing line renewal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54763-ref1">1</xref>]. It can tell us a true fact: China’s High Speed Railway has entered an unprecedented rapid development period. Under this background, research on operation cost-benefits of china high-speed railway is most important and meaningful.</p><p>The article focuses on comprehensive benefits of high speed railway train with initial letter G, D and C or with speed more than 200 Km/h [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54763-ref2">2</xref>] (see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>-1). Comprehensive benefits include social benefits, economic</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>-1</label><caption><title>Research scope</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Range of Trains</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Range of Benefits</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >High speed railway train with initial letter G, D and C or with speed more than 200 Km/h.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Social benefits</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Economic benefits</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Market benefits</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>benefits and market benefit.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Analysis and Evaluation on Operation Cost-Benefits</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Definition and Composition of Comprehensive Benefits</title><sec id="s2_1_1"><title>2.1.1. Social Benefits</title><p>Social benefits are promoting effects to region economic and trade exchanges, tourism development, the personnel flow and material circulation brought by opening of high speed railway train in origin station, intermediate station and terminal station [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54763-ref3">3</xref>]. This index can be reflect and explained by the following three detailed indexes:</p><p>1) Number of Train N</p><p>The index is quantity of opening train to transport predict volume of passengers.</p><p>2) Number of Passengers Carried Q<sub>p </sub></p><disp-formula id="scirp.54763-formula652"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/54763x3.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>N<sub>i </sub>Denotes the quantity of train of type i</p><p>A<sub>i </sub>Denotes the train quota of train of type i l Denotes Train Average Attendance Rate</p><p>3) Train Average Transport Mileage l</p><disp-formula id="scirp.54763-formula653"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/54763x4.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/54763x5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>denotes total mileage of train <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/54763x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> denotes total number of opening train</p></sec><sec id="s2_1_2"><title>2.1.2. Economic Benefits</title><p>Economic benefits are earnings equaling to the transportation revenue minus the corresponding costs brought by opening of high speed railway train. It can be explained by the following indexes:</p><p>1) Total Transportation Revenue I<sub>t</sub></p><p>It is sum of all types of transportation revenue concluding ticket revenue, package revenue, mail revenue and other revenue. The indexes can be calculated by the following formula:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.54763-formula654"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/54763x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>P<sub>i</sub> Denotes fare rate of train</p><p>2) Total Transportation Costs C<sub>t</sub></p><p>It is sum of all types of transportation costs. The indexes can be calculated simply by the following formula:</p><p><img src="http://html.scirp.org/file/54763x9.png" /><img src="http://html.scirp.org/file/54763x8.png" /> (4)</p><p>c denotes unit costs of a person kilometer MI denotes average mileage M denotes total volume of passengers</p><p>3) Train Average Attendance Rate l</p><disp-formula id="scirp.54763-formula655"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/54763x10.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/54763x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>Denotes traffic density l Denotes length of interval station l Denotes average of l<sub>k</sub></p></sec><sec id="s2_1_3"><title>2.1.3. Market Benefits</title><p>Market benefits are effects on improvement of railway passenger traffic, increasing of railway competition capacity and strong attractive to potential passenger market [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54763-ref4">4</xref>]. It can be reflected and explained by two types of indexes as follows:</p><p>1) Service Quality Index It can be divided the following three types:</p><p>①Degree of Convenience Index It is gotten by the experts grading score.</p><p>②Degree of Comfort Index It is also gotten by the experts grading score.</p><p>③Departure Frequency Index It is the percentage of opening train numbers accounts for total train number.</p><p>2) Market Competition Index It can be divided the following three types:</p><p>①Available Type of Train Index It is total type available for passengers to choose.</p><p>②Average Service Frequency Index It is train number allowing to chosen by passengers.</p><p>③Train Average Speed It is average speed of opening train which can be gotten by statistics.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Establishment of Evaluation Indexes System</title><p>According to the definition and description above-mentioned, a detailed evaluation indexes system of high speed railway is as follows. See <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>-1.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Selection of Calculation Model</title><p>The article takes Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Method (FAHP) to establish comprehensive calculation model to evaluate the comprehensive benefits of opening CRH. The comprehensive calculation model is as follows [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54763-ref5">5</xref>]. See Formula 2-6, 2-7.</p><disp-formula id="scirp.54763-formula656"><label>(Formula 2-6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/54763x12.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.54763-formula657"><label>(Formula 2-7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/54763x13.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In the comprehensive calculation model, W denotes weight vector; W<sub>i </sub>denotes weight of No i evaluation index; R denotes total evaluation matrix of n evaluation indexes; B denotes comprehensive evaluation index matrix; b<sub>j</sub> denotes membership of level i.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Set an Example to Illustrate the Application of Evaluation Indexes and Calculation Model</title><p>According to the FAHP Method and Comprehensive Calculation Model, the detailed five evaluation steps applied in M train are as follows:</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>-1</label><caption><title>Detailed evaluation indexes system of high speed railway</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Objective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Detailed Objective</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Types of total indexes</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Detailed indexes</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="12"  >Comprehensive benefits</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Social benefits</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >railway traffic volume index</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number of Train</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Number of Passengers Carried</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Train Average Transport Mileage</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Economics benefits</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Economic benefits index</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total transportation Revenue</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total Transportation Costs</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Train Attendance Rate</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="6"  >Market benefits</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Service Quality Index</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Degree of Convenience Index</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Degree of Comfort Index</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Departure Frequency Index</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >Market Competition Index</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Available Type of Train Index</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Average Service Frequency Index</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Train Average Speed</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. Establish Hierarchical Structure Chart (See <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>-1)</title><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>-1</label><caption><title>Hierarchical structure chart</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/54763x14.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Establish Fuzzy Complementary Matrix and Weight Calculation</title><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>-1</label><caption><title>Fuzzy Complementary Matrix to determine T and T<sub>1</sub>-T<sub>4</sub></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >T</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>1</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>2</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>3</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>4</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >W</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>1</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.175</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3125</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>3</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.275</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>4</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2375</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>-2</label><caption><title>FCM to determine T<sub>1</sub> and T<sub>11</sub>-T<sub>13</sub></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>1</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>11</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>12</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>13</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >W<sub>1</sub></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>11</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.321</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>12</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.383</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>13</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.296</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>-3</label><caption><title>FCM to determine T<sub>2</sub> and T<sub>21</sub>-T<sub>23</sub></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>2</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>21</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>22</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>23</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >W<sub>2</sub></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>21</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.358</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>22</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.284</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>23</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.358</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>-4</label><caption><title>FCM to determine T<sub>3</sub> and T<sub>31</sub>-T<sub>33</sub></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>3</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>31</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>32</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>33</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >W<sub>3</sub></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>31</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.333</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>32</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.371</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>33</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.296</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>-5</label><caption><title>FCM to determine T<sub>4</sub> and T<sub>41</sub>-T<sub>43</sub></title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>4</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>41</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>42</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>43</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >W<sub>4</sub></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>41</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.296</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>42</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.371</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >T<sub>43</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.333</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s3_3"><title>3.3. Determining Membership of Evaluation Index and Judgment Matrix</title><p>R<sub>1</sub> = <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/54763x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> R<sub>2</sub> = <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/54763x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>R<sub>3</sub> = <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/54763x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> R<sub>4</sub> = <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/54763x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p></sec><sec id="s3_4"><title>3.4. Establish Comprehensive Evaluation Model</title><disp-formula id="scirp.54763-formula658"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/54763x19.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.54763-formula659"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/54763x20.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.54763-formula660"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/54763x21.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.54763-formula661"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/54763x22.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.54763-formula662"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/54763x23.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.54763-formula663"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/54763x24.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s3_5"><title>3.5. Calculate Comprehensive Evaluation Value</title><disp-formula id="scirp.54763-formula664"><graphic  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/54763x25.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>According to the comprehensive evaluation value, the M train gets 7.102 score. It indicate that M train’s comprehensive benefit is more than middle-level.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>In conclusion, China’s High Speed Railway has gradually become the main and important mode of transportation in railway enterprise. Under the background, the objects of opening and operation of high speed railway is pursuit of maximum comprehensive benefits, which including social benefits, economic benefits and market benefits. Based on the three parts benefits, the article establishes a comprehensive evaluation indexes system and to further set an example to verify it taking the FAHP (Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process) Calculation Model, it proves that comprehensive evaluation indexes system is reliable and feasible and high speed railway train should pursue comprehensive benefits. For this purpose, some effective measures to improve comprehensive benefits of CRH should be taken. Optimizing the opening plan of CRH, Improving transportation revenues based on flexible pricing strategy, strengthen costs control, actively expanding the market and improving service quality, which are all effective measures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54763-ref6">6</xref>].</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>Qing Yang, (2015) Research on Operation Cost-Benefits of China High-Speed Railway. Open Journal of Social Sciences,03,42-47. doi: 10.4236/jss.2015.33009</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.54763-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Du, D., Peng, Q.H. and Wu, Y. (2008) Modern Comprehensive Evaluation Method and Classic Cases. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, 6: 100-112.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54763-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Song</surname><given-names> W. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2009</year>)<article-title>Study on Performance of Running Railway Passenger Trains</article-title><source> Railway Transport and Economy</source><volume> 1</volume>,<fpage> 16</fpage>-<lpage>19</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54763-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yu, H.L. (2009) Study on Evaluating of Passenger Running Plan. Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, 6, 37-38.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54763-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, X.X. (2011) Evaluation of High-Speed Railway Passenger Train Service Plan and System Development. Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, 6: 14-22.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54763-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names> H.R. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2013</year>)<article-title>Study on Opening Benefits of CRH</article-title><source> China Chief Financial Officer</source><volume> 10</volume>,<fpage> 103</fpage>-<lpage>105</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54763-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Li, H.L. (2012) Study on Passenger Train Plan of High-Speed Railway. Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, 6: 36-39.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>