<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>American Journal of Plant Sciences</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2158-2742</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2015.65072</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AJPS-54736</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Biomedical&amp;Life Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Chemical Characterization, Antibacterial and Antioxidant Activities of Essential Oils of &lt;i&gt;Mentha viridis&lt;/i&gt; L. and &lt;i&gt;Mentha pulegium&lt;/i&gt; L. (L)
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ucilene</surname><given-names>Fernandes Silva</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Maria</surname><given-names>das Graças Cardoso</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Luís</surname><given-names>Roberto Batista</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Marcos</surname><given-names>de Souza Gomes</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Leonardo</surname><given-names>Milani Avelar Rodrigues</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Danúbia</surname><given-names>Aparecida de Carvalho Selvati Rezende</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Maria</surname><given-names>Luisa Teixeira</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Marcos</surname><given-names>Schleiden Sousa Carvalho</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Juliana</surname><given-names>de Andrade Santiago</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>David</surname><given-names>Lee Nelson</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff3"><addr-line>Department of Agriculture, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Brazil</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Chemistry, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Brazil</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Food Science, Federal University of Lavras, Lavras, Brazil</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff4"><addr-line>Federal University of Vales de Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Diamantina, Brazil</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>mcardoso@dqi.ufla.br(MDGC)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>11</day><month>03</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>05</issue><fpage>666</fpage><lpage>675</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>30</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>15</month>	<year>March</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>17</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The essential oils from 
  &lt;i&gt;Mentha viridis
  &lt;/i&gt; L. and 
  &lt;i&gt;Mentha pulegium
  &lt;/i&gt; L. were characterized by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC-MS). These oils were obtained by hydrodistillation and presented linalool (40.70%), carvone (13.52%) and α-terpinene (8.56%) as the principal constituents in the essential oil from 
  &lt;i&gt;Mentha viridis
  &lt;/i&gt; L. Pulegone (50.01%), menthol (31.90%) and menthone (16.56%) were the principal constituents in the essential oil from 
  &lt;i&gt;Mentha pulegium&lt;/i&gt; L. These essential oils (in concentrations ranging from 3.91 to 500 μL
  &#183;mL
  <sup>-1</sup>) showed satisfactory activities against 
  &lt;i&gt;Escherichia coli
  &lt;/i&gt;, 
  &lt;i&gt;Listeria monocytogenes
  &lt;/i&gt;, 
  &lt;i&gt;Salmonella choleraesuis
  &lt;/i&gt; and 
  &lt;i&gt;Staphylococcus aureus
  &lt;/i&gt;. The antioxidant activities with 2-deoxyribose and phosphomolybdenum and the reducing power (in concentrations ranging from 0.78 to 1000 μL
  &#183;mL
  <sup>-1</sup>) were determined. The antioxidant activity was observed for the two oils evaluated by the phosphomolybdenum and 2-deoxyribose methods, whereas the essential oil from 
  &lt;i&gt;M. viridis
  &lt;/i&gt; presented low antioxidant activity in the reducing power assay.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Mentha</kwd><kwd> Linalool</kwd><kwd> Pulegone</kwd><kwd> Volatiles</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Essential oils are composed of a number of compounds of different biosynthetic origins ranging from terpenoid hydrocarbons to sulfur compounds [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54736-ref1">1</xref>] , and such compounds are naturally present in different concentrations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54736-ref2">2</xref>] . The essential oils of the Mentha genus have a high commercial value, because they usually contain the monoterpene menthol in their constitutions, and menthol is widely used in pharmaceutical, cosmetic, personal care and food products [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54736-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>Within the broad spectrum of action of the essential oils, one can highlight the study of their activities against bacteria [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54736-ref4">4</xref>] . Several methods have been used by mankind with the intention of obtaining produce uncontaminated by these microorganisms. Essential oils constitute a viable alternative because of the fact that they are substances of low molecular weight, are volatile and usually exhibit low toxicity to mammals. Bacteria have caused many problems that result mainly from the proliferation of resistant microorganisms. They are among the most serious threats to public health and the success of anti-bacterial treatment. Recently, the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains has increased dramatically, so the search for natural substances to control these microorganisms is of paramount importance [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54736-ref4">4</xref>] . The changing lifestyle of the population is concomitant with the phenomenon of bacterial resistance. Stress, pollution, poor diet, physical inactivity and other factors are evidence that bad habits can cause serious human health problems. One of the effects posed by these bad habits is the oxidative stress that can cause various biochemical alterations, and consequently serious disorders in the human body. Oxidative stress can result in damage to the basic biomolecules such as lipids, proteins and DNA and can promote cytotoxic and genotoxic effects in cells [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54736-ref5">5</xref>] .</p><p>Many compounds produced by plants have been evaluated to obtain substances active against oxidative stress, that is, compounds with antioxidant properties. The essential oils are among the natural products that have been studied to evaluate their antioxidant potentials [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54736-ref6">6</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54736-ref7">7</xref>] . In this study we sought to characterize the essential oils extracted from Mentha viridis L. and Mentha pulegium L. (L), as well as to evaluate their antibacterial and antioxidant activities.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Collection, identification and extraction of the essential oils</title><p>Leaves and flowers from M. viridis and M. pulegium were collected at 07:00 a.m. in the month of November 2012 in the Garden of Medicinal Plants of the Federal University of Lavras on a mild day with no precipitation. The city of Lavras is located in the southern part of the state of Minas Gerais (Brazil) at 21˚14'S, longitude 45˚00'W Gr. and at 918 meters in altitude. The plants were identified in the Herbarium of the Department of Biology (DBI) of the Federal University of Lavras (UFLA). After being identified, they were incorporated into the collection of the ESAL Herbarium under registration numbers 27,122 (Mentha pulegium L. (L)) and 27,123 (Mentha viridis L.).</p><p>The leaves of the two Mentha species were weighed and extracted by hydrodistillation for two hours using a modified Clevenger apparatus adapted to a six-liter round bottom flask. The distillate was centrifuged in a centrifuge with a horizontal crosspiece (Model R 206 T FANEM BL) at 965.36 g for 10 minutes. The essential oil was collected with the aid of a Pasteur pipette, transferred to a vial and placed in a drying pistol to remove any trace of moisture. Subsequently, the flask was kept refrigerated until use for biological analyses [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54736-ref8">8</xref>] . The extraction of the essential oils was performed in triplicate. To determine the moisture content for subsequent calculation of the yield of the oil present in the fresh plant, 5 g of the chopped plant material was extracted with 80 mL of cyclohexane, employing a Dean-Stark extractor. The moisture content was determined in triplicate according to the method described by Pimentel et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54736-ref9">9</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Identification and quantification of essential oil components</title><p>Quantitative analysis and the identification of the essential oil constituents were performed at the Federal University of Lavras (UFLA). Quantitative and qualitative analyses of the essential oils were performed on a Shimadzu GC-2010 gas chromatograph equipped with a GCMS-QP 2010 Plus mass spectrometer under the following operating conditions: an RTX-5MS (5% dimethylpolysiloxane) fused silica capillary column (30 m &#215; 0.25 mm i.d. &#215; 0:25 μm film), using helium as the carrier gas with a flow rate of 1.18 mL・min<sup>−1</sup>. The initial column temperature was 60˚C. The temperature was programmed at 3˚C・min<sup>−1</sup> to 240˚C, followed by an increase of 10˚C・min<sup>−1</sup> to 300˚C, where the temperature was maintained constant for 7 min. The injector temperature was 200˚C and the detector (or interface) temperature was 240˚C. A one &#181;L volume of the essential oil dissolved in dichloromethane was injected into the chromatograph. The ion capture detector was operated in electron impact mode with an impact energy of 70 eV. The scan speed was 1000, the scan interval was 0.50 fragments, and the fragments were detected in the range of 45 to 500 Da.</p></sec><sec id="s2_3"><title>2.3. Antibacterial activity</title><p>The evaluation of the antibacterial activity of the essential oils was accomplished at the Food Microbiology Laboratory of the Department of Food Science at the Federal University of Lavras. The microorganisms employed were: Escherichia coli ATCC 11229, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538, Salmonella choleraesuis ATCC 6539 and Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 7644. During the experiment, the microorganisms were kept in tubes containing freezing medium under refrigeration (4˚C). For activation of the bacterial cultures, strains were transplanted to brain-heart-infusion (BHI) broth and were incubated at 37˚C for 24 hours to obtain the inoculum.</p><p>Upon activation of the bacterial suspension, 300 μL of the medium was transferred to a tube containing 5 mL of peptone, casein and soy broth (TSB). The tubes were again incubated at 37˚C until they reached the turbidity of a 0.5 McFarland standard reference solution, resulting in a suspension containing approximately 1 to 2 &#215; 10<sup>8</sup> CFU/mL. The correct density of the turbidity control was verified using a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-160 PC 1) at a wavelength of 625 nm, wherein the absorbance occurred between 0.10 and 0.8, a value recommended by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54736-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>The antibacterial activity of the essential oils was determined by diffusion in an agar cavity employing TSA agar (Triptic Soy Agar) for Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 7644 and Mueller-Hinton agar Pereira et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54736-ref11">11</xref>] for the other species (Escherichia coli ATCC 11229, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538, and Salmonella choleraesuis ATCC 6539). Initially, a thin layer of agar was added to Petri dishes (140 mm diameter). After solidification, 4-mm sterile glass beads were placed on the solid medium. Aliquots of standardized cultures of Escherichia coli ATCC 11229, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 6538, Salmonella choleraesuis ATCC 6539 and Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 7644 were transferred to glass flasks containing 90 mL of Mueller-Hinton agar or TSA, respectively, to furnish concentrations of 10<sup>6</sup> CFU mL<sup>−1</sup> in the developing culture. The liquid medium was poured onto the previous layer.</p><p>After solidification of the agar or TSA, the glass beads were removed with the aid of sterile forceps, and the essential oil was deposited in the pits. Dilutions were made in dimethylsulfoxide solution (DMSO) in the proportions 1:1; 1:2; 1:4; 1:8; 1:16; 1:32; 1:64 and 1:128 parts of essential oil to parts of diluent to give concentrations of 500; 250; 125; 62.5; 31.3; 15.62; 7.81 and 3.90 μL・mL<sup>−1</sup>. Ten microliters of diluted essential oil was applied to the cavities. The plates were incubated in BOD at 37˚C for 24 hours, and the diameters of the inhibition zones were measured. Three replicates were performed for each treatment. For the negative control, 10 μL of DMSO was applied. For the positive standard, a solution of 1000 mg・L<sup>−1</sup> of chloramphenicol (CL) was used [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54736-ref12">12</xref>] . The sensitivity of the bacteria to different concentrations of essential oils was determined from the diameters of the inhibition zones. The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) was defined as the lowest concentration of essential oil for which an inhibition halo was observed.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4"><title>2.4. Antioxidant activities</title><sec id="s2_4_1"><title>2.4.1. 2-Deoxyribose Assay</title><p>The antioxidant activity of sequestering the hydroxyl radical was determined from the decrease in the formation of substances reactive to TBA (thiobarbituric acid) from deoxyribose caused by degradation by the hydroxyl radical [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54736-ref13">13</xref>] . Solutions of essential oils were prepared at concentrations of 0.78; 1.56; 3.12; 6.25; 12.5; 25; 50; 100; 150; 200; 250; 500 and 750, and 1000 μL・mL<sup>−1</sup> in water. The reaction mixtures were prepared in tubes containing 50 μL of the sample; 100 μL of Fe-EDTA Mix, 100 μL of deoxyribose, 680 μL of 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, and 100 μL of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> were incubated for 2 hours in a water bath at 37˚C. To terminate the reaction, 500 μL of trichloroacetic acid and 500 μL of TBA were added. The tubes were placed in a water bath for 10 minutes. For the blank, all the reagents were added except deoxyribose, and for the control, all the reagents were added except the sample. Tests for comparison were performed with mannitol, which is used to reduce brain edema, hypertension and other diseases. Absorbance readings were performed on a Shimadizu UV-1601PC spectrophotometer at 527 nm.</p></sec><sec id="s2_4_2"><title>2.4.2. Reducing power assay</title><p>The test was performed by colorimetric measurements at 700 nm in a Shimadizu UV-1601PC spectrophotometer. To measure the activity, 50 μL of different concentrations of essential oils (0.78; 1.56; 3.12; 6.25; 12.5; 25; 50; 100; 150; 200; 250; 500 and 750 and 1000 μL・mL<sup>−1</sup>) in ethanol were added to 500 μL of 200 mM phosphate buffer, pH 6, and 500 μL of 1% potassium hexacyanoferrate (III). The mixture was stirred and incubated for 20 minutes at 50˚C. To the mixture, were added 500 μL of TCA, 1500 μl H<sub>2</sub>O and 300 μL of FeCl<sub>3</sub>. The procedure was repeated without the sample for the negative control. The blank only contained ethanol.</p><p>A curve of the absorbance versus the concentration of the sample was constructed for the determination of the antioxidant activity. BHT was used as a positive control, and the analyses were performed in triplicate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54736-ref14">14</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s2_4_3"><title>2.4.3. Reduction of the phosphomolybdenum complex</title><p>Solutions (50 μL) of the essential oils in different concentrations (0.78; 1.56; 3.12; 6.25; 12.5; 25; 50; 100; 150; 200; 250; 500; 750 and 1000 &#181;L・mL<sup>−1</sup> ethanol) was added to 2 mL of the phosphomolybdenum reagent (10% sulfuric acid, 28 mM sodium phosphate, and 4 mM ammonium molybdate) and incubated for 60 min at 95˚C. After cooling, the tubes were read at 695 nm on a Shimadizu UV-1601PC spectrophotometer at 527 nm. Ethanol was used as a blank, and the sample was replaced by ethanol in the negative control. The antioxidant capacity of the essential oils was expressed relative to that of ascorbic acid [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54736-ref15">15</xref>] . Analytical curves of thirteen points with ascorbic acid (0.78 to 1000 mg・L<sup>−1</sup>) were constructed. BHT was also tested for comparison.</p><p>Calculations were performed using the absorbances obtained from the different dilutions (thirteen concentrations) of the essential oils. The graph of the the essential oils and BHT with the absorbance on the y-axis and the corresponding concentration for each dilution (μg・L<sup>−1</sup>) on the X axis was constructed, and the equation of the line was determined. The absorbance corresponding to the ascorbic acid standard was substituted into this equation to furnish the concentration of the sample that corresponded to 1.000 μg・L<sup>−1</sup> of ascorbic acid. The final result was calculated by dividing 1000 by the value of &#215; (g) and multiplying by 1 g and was expressed in μg・L<sup>−1</sup> g<sup>−1</sup> (μg・L<sup>−1</sup> essential oil per gram BHT) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54736-ref16">16</xref>] .</p></sec></sec><sec id="s2_5"><title>2.5. Statistical analysis</title><p>The data resulting from the antibacterial activity experiments were subjected to analysis of variance by the statistical program Variance Analysis System for Balanced data (SISVAR) in a factorial 2 &#215; 8 system (2 essential oils and 8 concentrations) according to the method of Ferreira [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54736-ref17">17</xref>] , and the means were compared by the Tukey test at 5% probability. Quantitative variables (antioxidant activity) were subjected to regression analysis for each method tested. To obtain the RI<sub>50</sub> (relative inhibition) for 2-deoxyribose antioxidant activity, graphs of the AA% values (percentage of antioxidant activity) versus the concentrations analyzed or A (absorbance) versus the concentrations were constructed.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><p>The yields of the essential oils of M. pulegium and M. viridis were 2.54% and 1.52%, respectively, on a moisture-free basis. Seven components were identified in the essential oil from M. pulegium (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). The major constituents were pulegone (50.01%), menthol (31.9%) and menthone (16.56%).</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Composition of the essential oil from Mentha pulegium L</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Peak No.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >RT<sup>*</sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Compound</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >% &#193;rea</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >α-Phelandrene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >β-Pinene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.17</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cyclohexene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.41</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Menthone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >cis-Isopulegone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Menthol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.90</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pulegone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><sup>*</sup>RT = Retention time.</p><p>Oliveira et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54736-ref18">18</xref>] studied the essential oil from Metha pulegium collected in the spring and winter. They detected 6.62% borneol, 61.43% pulegone in the spring and 8.87% borneol and 28.40% pulegone in the winter. The authors demonstrated the influence of seasonality with a 54% reduction in the concentration of pulegone in the winter. In the essential oil from M. pulegium, pulegone is the precursor for the formation of the stereoisomers of menthone, and this transformation leads to a reduction in the pulegone content of the essential oils. These stereoisomers form the acetylated menthyl, neoisomenthyl and isomenthyl derivatives. The concentration of pulegone (61.43%) in the spring is similar to that observed in the present study. The concentration of borneol (8.87%), however, is different.</p><p>Ait-Ouazzou et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54736-ref19">19</xref>] also observed that pulegone was the principal constituent (69.8%) in the essential oil from M. pulegium, followed by piperitenone (3.1%), isopulegone (1.8%), and cis piperitone epoxide (1.7%). These authors found pulegone in all their studies on the essential oils from M. pulegium. Variations in the compositions of essential oils are explained by the variation in location, time of collection, and the stress to which the plant was exposed, among other factors. Therefore, differences in the concentrations of constituents are very common when work is performed with essential oils [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54736-ref20">20</xref>] .</p><p>The 32 constituents encountered in the essential oil from M. viridis are presented in (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>). The principal</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Composition of the essential oil from Mentha viridis L</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Peak No.</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >RT*</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Compound</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >% &#193;rea</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.544</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >α-Tujene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >α-Pinene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.69</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.818</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sabinene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.936</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >β-Pinene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.164</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3-Octanone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.284</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Myrcene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.429</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >α-Terpinene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.155</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ethylhexanol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.28</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.425</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >p-Cymene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.81</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.563</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Limonene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.53</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.667</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1,8-Cineol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.78</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.848</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >β-Ocimene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.633</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ɤ-Terpinene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.93</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.955</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >trans-Sabinene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.164</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >trans-Linalool</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.757</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Terpinolene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.47</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.266</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Linalool</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.086</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Menth-2-en-1-ol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.359</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Terpinen-4-ol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.82</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.933</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >α-Terpineol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.84</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.105</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cyclohexanol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.192</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >trans-Carveol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.414</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Isoascaridol</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.793</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Isovalerate</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.209</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Carvone</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.52</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.119</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >β ?Farnesene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.517</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bicyclo[7.2.0]undec-4-ene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.01</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.289</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >α-Humulene</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.024</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >ɤ-Cadineno</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.32</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.434</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Germancrene D</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >28.704</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Propanoic acid</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.051</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Caryophylene oxide</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.7</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>constituents were linalool (40.7%), carvone (13.52%) and α-terpinene (8.56%). Mkaddem et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54736-ref21">21</xref>] identified carvone (50.47%) as the principal constituent in the essential oil from M. viridis, followed by 1,8-cineole (9.14%), limonene (4.87%), camphor (3.68%) and β-caryophyllene (3%). All the major compounds found by those authors, except camphor, were also found in the present study. However, only carvone was found to be the principal constituent in both studies. Ashnagar et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54736-ref22">22</xref>] identified carvone as the principal constituent in the essential oil from M. viridis. Similarly, linalool and carvone were observed to be the principal components in the current study.</p><p>The chemical composition of the essential oils is influenced by factors such as leaf development and the emergence of new organs, which may lead to lower concentrations of these metabolites caused by translocation, as well as by effects such as seasonality, rain levels, and the stress to which the plant is exposed. These effects can directly influence the quantity and quality of the constituents in the essential oil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54736-ref20">20</xref>] .</p><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. The antibacterial activities of the essential oils</title><p>The antibacterial activities of the essential oils from M. viridis and M. pulegium against the Gram-negative bacteria E. coli and S. choleraesuis and against the Gram-positive bacteria S. aureus and L. monocytogenes are described in (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>).</p><p>The essential oils from M. viridis and M. pulegium presented the same minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 62.5 μL・mL<sup>−1</sup> for the Gram-negative bacterium E. coli, forming 6-mm inhibition halos at this concentration. Unlike E. coli, S. choleraesuis was more sensitive to the essential oils. The minimum inhibitory concentration was 31.3 μL・mL<sup>−1</sup> for both essential oils. The diameters of the inhibition zones were 8 mm.</p><p>Differences in the minimum inhibitory concentrations of the essential oils were observed for Gram-positive bacteria. The essential oil from M. pulegium was more effective against S. aureus, but the minimum inhibitory concentration was 15.6 μL・mL<sup>−1</sup>, and the inhibition halo formed was 5 mm. The minimum inhibitory concentration was 62.50 μL・mL<sup>−1</sup> for the essential oil from M. viridis, and an 8-mm inhibition zone was formed. The minimum inhibitory concentrations and inhibition halos for the Gram-positive bacteria L. monocytogenes were 62.50 μL・mL<sup>−1</sup> (6 mm) and 125 μL・mL<sup>−1</sup> (7 mm) for oils from M. viridis and M. pulegium, respectively. With respect to the microorganisms S. choleraesuis and E. coli, the MIC for the essential oil from M. pulegium was similar to that for the essential oil from M. viridis (31.3 μL・mL<sup>−1</sup> and 62.5 μL・mL<sup>−1</sup>, respectively, for the two microorganisms). This fact was probably due to both the difference between the bacteria and the difference in the chemical constituents present in essential oils. The antibiotic chloramphenicol inhibit all the bacteria, forming a 25-mm inhibition zone for all the microorganisms tested at the concentration of 1000 mg・L<sup>−1</sup>.</p><p>Boukhebti et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54736-ref23">23</xref>] studied the essential oil from M. pulegium and observed that 10-mm and 7-mm inhibition zones were formed with the microorganism E. coli ATCC 25922 only when treated with 1:1 and 1:2 dilutions of the essential oil, respectively. Similarly, 12.5-mm and 7-mm inhibition zones, respectively, were formed with S. aureus ATCC 25923 when the same concentrations were tested. These results are different from those found in this study in which the essential oil from M. pulegium presented activity in a 1:4 dilution for E. coli and</p><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Antibacterial activities of the essential oils from M. viridis and M. pulegium</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="9"  >Mean diameters of the inhibition halos</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="7"  >Concentration (μL・mL<sup>−1</sup>)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Bacteria</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Sample</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >500</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >250</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >125</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >E. coli</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. pulegium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.0Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.0Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.0Bb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0Ac</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NIAd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NIAd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NIAd</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. viridis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.0Ba</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5Ba</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5Ba</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0Ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NIAc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NIAc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NIAc</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >S. choleraesuis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. pulegium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.0Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.0Bb</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.0Bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.0Ac</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.0Ad</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NIAe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NIAe</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. viridis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.0Ba</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.0Ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.0Ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.5Ac</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.0Ac</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NIAd</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NIAd</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >S. aureus</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. pulegium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5Ba</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.5Ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5Bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5Bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0Ac</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0Ac</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NIAd</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. viridis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.0Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.0Ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.0Ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.0Ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NIBc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NIBc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NIAc</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >L. monocytogenes</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. pulegium</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.5Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5Ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.5Bc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.0Ad</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NIAe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NIAe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NIAe</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M. viridis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5Ba</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5Aa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.0Ab</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NIBc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NIAc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NIAc</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >NIAc</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>NI: No inhibition. The capital letters represent the statistical analysis of essential oils (M. viridis and M. pulegium) within only one concentration, where the antibacterial activity in the column can be evaluated separately for each bacterium. Lowercase letters represent statistical analysis of only one essential oil at all the concentrations tested. Means followed by the same letter do not differ in the level of 5% probability by the Tukey test.</p><p>a 1:6 dilution for S. aureus. This difference may be associated with variations in the type and quantities of the constituents present in the essential oil, because Boukhebti et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54736-ref23">23</xref>] found pulegone (38.8%), menthone (19.2%) and β-bourbonene (16.4%) and pulegone (50.01%), menthone (31.90%) and menthol (16.56%) were observed to be the principal constituents in the present study.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. Antioxidant activities of the essential oils</title><p>The determination of antioxidant activity by the 2-deoxyribose method is summarized in (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>).The essential oil from M. pulegium presented the highest antioxidant activity, followed by the essential oil from M. viridis. The lowest antioxidant activity was that of mannitol. The RI<sub>50</sub> activities were 196.37; 340.36; and 5115.34 μg・mL<sup>−1</sup>, respectively.</p><p>Mimica-Dukic et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54736-ref24">24</xref>] studied the essencial oils from Mentha piperita, Mentha longifolia and Mentha aquatica neat and in solution (20% and 50% hexane). They observed that the essential oil from M. aquatica contained 1,8-cineol (14.15%), menthofuran (16.94%) and E-caryophyllene (9.36%) as the principal constituents. It exhibited the lowest activity of the samples studied (8.6% in 20% hexane solution), much lower than those observed for M. viridis and M. pulegium in the present study. The essential oil from M. longifolia was shown to exhibit antioxidant activity (18.2%) when tested neat in the Fenton reaction, in which the OH radical is reduced. The authors identified piperitone (38.79%), menthone (11.20%) and pulegone (4.88%) as the principal components of this oil, compounds which are also present in the essential oil from M. pulegium. The essential oil from M. piperita exhibited the highest activity (24%) by this method. Menthol (39.63%), methylacetate (10.44%) and menthone (8.93%) were among the constituents present in this oil. In the current study, the essential oils from M. pulegium and M. viridis exhibited higher antioxidant activities than was observed in their study.</p><p>The test of antioxidant activity by the reducing power method is commonly used to study the antioxidant capacity of plant materials. The determination of antioxidant activity by the power to reduce the ferric ion (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>) showed that the antioxidant activity increased with increasing concentration of the samples. This fact is demonstrated by the BHT standard because its antioxidant action also increased with increasing concentration.</p><p>Salarbashi et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54736-ref25">25</xref>] studied the effect of packaging films produced from soluble soybean incorporated with the essential oils from Zataria multiflora Boiss and M. pulegium. They observed that the reduction of ferric ion was dependent on the concentration of the essential oils. The authors suggested that the reducing power of these films was higher for films containing the essential oil from Z. multiflora Boiss than those containing the essential oil from M. pulegium in all the concentrations tested. This difference in activity was attributed to phenylpropanoids and terpenes present in the essential oil from Z. multiflora Boiss (thymol, carvacrol and γ-terpinene), which were different from those found in the essential oil from M. pulegium (pulegone, menthone and piperitone). In the present study, the essential oil from M. viridis exhibited very limited antioxidant activity in reducing the ferric ion. On the other hand, the antioxidant activity of the essential oil from M. pulegium exceeded that of the antioxidant standard BHT in concentrations from 0.78 to 50 μL・mL<sup>−1</sup>, but the control showed higher antioxidant activity at concentrations of 100 μL・mL<sup>−1</sup> and above. BHT (the standard widely used in industry) was the most efficient antioxidant at the concentration of 250 μL・mL<sup>−1</sup> in the phosphomolybdate method. At lower concentrations, the essential oil from M. pulegium presented an antioxidant activity higher than that of the standard, followed by the essential oil from M. viridis, as is shown in (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>).</p><p>In evaluating the bioprospection of the aerial parts and the essential oil from Liquidambar styraciflua L., Franco [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54736-ref26">26</xref>] noted that the total antioxidant capacity was dose-dependent both for the standard and the sample because the antioxidant capacity increased as the concentration increased. The highest value found for the total antioxidant capacity of the stem and bark samples from L. styraciflua may be related to the presence of compounds that act by both reducing mechanisms, redox and radical, causing a greater reduction in the complex in a similar manner. The effects of the essential oils in this study were dose-dependent because the increase in concentration of the essential oils resulted in an increased activity.</p><p>There are several in vitro methods for the evaluation of the antioxidant activity of a biologically active compound, and there is no universal method by which the antioxidant activity can be measured precisely and quantitatively. Different methods lead to different values for the antioxidant activities for the removal of distinct radicals. Numerous reactive species are used to assess antioxidant activities because of their different forms of acting in living organisms. Therefore, the greater the variety of methods used, the better, because each technique has a principle that depends on the reaction matrix. In addition, the bioactive compounds may react differently depending on the radical or oxidizing agent used in the method [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54736-ref27">27</xref>] .</p><fig-group id="fig1"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Antioxidante activity determined by the 2-deoxyribose method.</title></caption><fig id ="fig1_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-2601952x6.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig-group id="fig2"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Antioxidant activity determined by the reducing power method.</title></caption><fig id ="fig2_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-2601952x7.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig-group id="fig3"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Antioxidant activity determined by the phosphomolybdate reduction method.</title></caption><fig id ="fig3_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/12-2601952x8.png"/></fig></fig-group></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>The yield of the essential oil from M. pulegium (2.54%) was higher than the yield of the essential oil from M. viridis (1.52%). The major constituents of the essential oil from M. pulegium were pulegone (50.01%), menthol (31.90%) and menthone (16.56%), and those in the essential oil from M. viridis were linalool (40.70%), carvone (13.52%) and α-terpinene (8.56%). Both the oils exhibited inhibitory effects on the growth of the bacteria tested, being more effective against strains of S. aureus and S. choleraesuis. The species of bacteria that was the most resistant to the essential oils was E. coli. The essential oil from M. pulegium exhibited the highest antioxidant activity by the 2-deoxyribose method, followed by the essential oil from M. viridis and mannitol. By the iron reducing power method, only the BHT and the essential oil from M. pulegium possessed antioxidant activity. Both essential oils exhibited an antioxidant activity that was a third of the activity observed for the BHT using the phosphomolybdenum method. Data from bactericidal and antioxidant tests suggest that there is a high potential for application of the essential oils tested as natural preservatives, and they may have wide applications in food and cosmetics industries, among others.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors acknowledge the support of the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient&#237;fico e Tecnol&#243;gico (CNPq), the Funda&#231;&#227;o de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) and the Coordena&#231;&#227;o de Aperfei&#231;oamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES) for a PVNS fellowship (D. L. Nelson).</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.54736-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sim&amp;otildees, C.M.O., Schenkel, E.P., Gosmann, G., Mello, J.C.P., Mentz, L.A. and Petrovick, P.R. (2007) Farmacognosia: da planta ao medicamento. 6th Edition, UFSC/UFRGS, Porto Alegre, 1102 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54736-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oliveira, C.M., Cardoso, M.G., Figueiredo, A.C.S., Carvalho, M.L.M., Miranda, C.A.S.F., Albuquerque, L.R.M., Nelson, D.L., Gomes, M.S., Silva, L.F., Santiago, J.A., Teixeira, M.L. and Brand&amp;atildeo, R.M. (2014) Chemical Composition and Allelopathic Activity of the Essential Oil from Callistemon viminalis (Myrtaceae) Blossoms on Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) Seedlings. American Journal of Plant Science, 5, 3551-3557.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2014.524371</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54736-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Santos, V.M.C.S., Schneider, T.R.., Bizzo, H.R. and Deschamps, C. (2012) Alternativas de propaga&amp;ccedil&amp;atildeo na produ&amp;ccedil&amp;atildeo de óleo essencial de Mentha canadensis L. no Litoral Norte Catarinense. Revista Brasileira de Plantas Medicinais, 14, 97-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-05722012000100014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54736-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Solorzano-Santos, F. and Miranda-Novales, M.G. (2012) Essential Oils from Aromatic Herbs as Antimicrobial Agents. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 23, 136-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2011.08.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54736-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mimica-Duki&amp;cacute, N., Bugarin, D., Grbovi&amp;cacute, S., Miti&amp;cacute-Culafi&amp;cacute, D., Vukovi&amp;cacute-Gaci&amp;cacute, B., Orci&amp;cacute, D., Jovin, E. and Couladis, M. (2010) Essential Oil of Myrtus communis L. as a Potential Antioxidant and Antimutagenic Agents. Molecules, 15, 2759-2770. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules15042759</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54736-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Teixeira, M.L., Cardoso, M.G., Figueiredo, A.C.S., Moraes, J.C., Assis, F.A., Andrade, J., Nelson, D.L., Gomes, M.S., Souza, J.A. and Albuquerque, L.R.M. (2014) Essential Oils from Lippia origanoides Kunth. and Mentha spicata L.: Chemical Composition, Insecticidal and Antioxidant Activities. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 5, 3551-3557.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2014.59131</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54736-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Andrade, M.L., Cardoso, M.G., Andrade, J., Silva, L.F., Teixeira, M.L., Resende, J.M.V., Figueiredo, A.C.S. and Barroso, J.G. (2013) Chemical Composition and Antioxidant Activity of Essential Oils from Cinnamodendron dinisii Schwacke and Siparuna guianensis Aublet. Antioxidants, 2, 384-397. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antiox2040384</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54736-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brasil (2010) Agência Nacional de Vigilancia Sanitária. Farmacopeia Brasileira. 5th Edition, Anvisa, Brasília, 1, 198- 199.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54736-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pimentel, F.A., Cardoso, M.G., Salgado, A.P.S.P., Aguiar, P.M., Silva, V.F., Morais, A.R. and Nelson, D.L. (2006) A Convenient Method for The determination of Moisturein Aromatic Plants. Química Nova, 29, 373-375.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422006000200031</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54736-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (2003) Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically: Approved Standard. 6th Edition, NCCLS Document M7-A6, NCCLS, Wayne, 940.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54736-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pereira, A.A., Cardoso, M.G., Abreu, L.R., Morais, A.R., Guimar&amp;atildees, L.G.L. and Salgado, A.P.S.P. (2008) Caracteriza- &amp;ccedil&amp;atildeo química e efeito inibitório de óleos essenciais sobre crescimento de Staphylococcus aureus e Escherichia coli. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 32, 887-893. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542008000300028</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54736-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ogunwande, I.A., Olawore, N.O., Ekundayo, O., Walker, T.M., Schmidt, J.M. and Setzer, W.N. (2005) Studies on the Essential Oils Composition, Antibacterial and Cytotoxicity of Eugenia uniflora L. International Journal of Aromatherapy, 15, 147-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijat.2005.07.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54736-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Halliwel, B., Gutteridge, J.M.C. and Aruoma, O.I. (1987) The Deoxyrribose Method: A Simple “Test-Tube” Assay for Determination of Rate Constants for Reactions of Hydroxyl Radicals. Analytical Biochemistry, 165, 215-219.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(87)90222-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54736-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kanatt, S.R., Chander, R. and Sharma, A. (2007) Antioxidant Potential of Mint (Mentha spicata L.) in Radiation- Processed Lamb Meat. Food Chemistry, 100, 451-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.09.066</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54736-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Prieto, P., Pineda, M.E. and Aguilar, M. (1999) Spectrophotometric Quantitation of Antioxidant Capacity through the Formation of a Phosphomolybdenum Complex: Specific Application to the Determination of Vitamin E. Analytical Biochemistry, 269, 337-341. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/abio.1999.4019</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54736-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rufino, M.S.M., Alves, R.E., De Brito, E.S., De Morais, S.M., Sampaio, C.G., Pérez-Jimenez, J. and Saura-Calixto, F.D. (2007) Determina&amp;ccedil&amp;atildeo da atividade antioxidante total em frutas pela captura do radical livre ABTS+. Embrapa, Fortaleza, 4 p. (Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical. Comunicado Técnico, 128).  
http://www.cnpat.embrapa.br/cnpat/down/index.php?pub/Cot_128.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54736-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ferreira</surname><given-names> D.F. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2011</year>)<article-title>Sisvar: A Computer Statistical Analysis System</article-title><source> Ciência e Agrotecnologia</source><volume> 35</volume>,<fpage> 1039</fpage>-<lpage>1042</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54736-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Oliveira, R.A., Sá, I.C.G., Duarte, L.P. and Oliveira, F.F. (2011) Constituintes voláteis de Mentha pulegium L. e Plectranthus amboinicus (Lour.) Spreng. Revista Brasileira de Plantas Medicinais, 13, 165-169.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-05722011000200007</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54736-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ait-Ouazzou, A., Lorán, S., Arakrak, A., Laglaoui, A., Rota, C., Herrera, A., Pagán, R. and Conchello, P. (2012) Evaluation of the Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial Activity of Mentha pulegium, Juniperus phoenicea, and Cyperus longus Essential Oils from Morocco. Food Research International, 45, 313-319.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2011.09.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54736-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gobbo-Neto, L. and Lopes, N.P. (2007) Plantas medicinais: Fatores de influência no conteúdo de metabólitos secundários. Química Nova, 30, 374-381. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422007000200026</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54736-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mkaddem, M., Bouajila, J., Ennajar, M., Lebrihi, A., Mathieu, F. and Romdhane, M. (2009) Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activities of Mentha (longifolia L. and viridis) Essential Oils. Journal of Food Science, 74, M358-M363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01272.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54736-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ashnagar, A., Gharib Naseri, N. and Rezaei, N. (2007) Isolation and Identification of the Major Chemical Components Found in Spearmint Leaves (Mentha viridis) Grown in Ahwaz City, Iran. Biosciences, Biotechnology Research Asia, 4, 43-48.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54736-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Boukhebti, H., Chaker, A.N., Belhadj, H., Sahli, F., Ramdhani, M., Laouer, H. and Harzallah, D. (2011) Chemical Composition and Antibacterial Activity of Mentha pulegium L. and Mentha spicata L. Essential Oils. Der Pharmacia Lettre, 3, 267-275.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54736-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mimica-Duki&amp;cacute, N., Bozin, B., Sokovi&amp;cacute, M., Mihajlovi&amp;cacute, B. and Matavulj, M. (2003) Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activities of Three Mentha Species Essential Oil. Planta Medica, 69, 413-419.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-39704</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54736-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salarbashi, D., Tajik, S., Shojaee-Aliabadi, S., Ghasemlou, M., Moayyed, H., Khaksar, R. and Noghabi, M.S. (2014) Development of New Active Packaging Film Made from a Soluble Soybean Polysaccharide Incorporated Zataria multiflora Boiss and Mentha pulegium Essential Oils. Food Chemistry, 146, 614-622.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.09.014</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54736-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Franco, G.F. (2013) Bioprospec&amp;ccedil&amp;atildeo das partes aéreas e óleo essencial de Liquidambar styraciflua L., Altingiaceae. Disserta&amp;ccedil&amp;atildeo (Mestrado em Ciências Farmacêuticas), Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, 117 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54736-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alves, C.Q., David, J.M., David, J.P., Bahia, M.V. and Aguiar, R.M. (2010) Métodos para determina&amp;ccedil&amp;atildeo de atividade antioxidante in Vitro em substratos organicos. Química Nova, 33, 2202-2210.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422010001000033</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>