The purpose of this work is to design and analyze an s-shaped printed circuit board (PCB) monopole antenna. The antenna was analyzed to operate at a resonance frequency band of 868 MHz; acceptable in 915 MHz as well. The s-shape is selected due to the need of reducing the overall size of the normal monopole antenna. The printed antenna was designed with an approximate overall size of 39 × 56 mm2 of which the antenna’s upper side is 26 × 39 mm2 while its reference ground board was sized at 39 × 30 mm2. The antenna is fed by a strip line of 3 × 1.5 mm2, in series with a 4.4 pF capacitance and shunt with an 8.7 nH inductance for purpose of antenna’s impedance matching with the input. A couple of existing publications showed that PCB antenna is not a new technology; however not an old technology for telecommunication industry. The raised problem by this work was duly solved with HFSS as a tool; excellent results are presented. After duly matching the antenna’s impedance with 50 Ω microstrip feed-line, solutions for overall performance were analyzed and demonstrated optimal: radiation patterns were proven omnidirectional, antenna gain optimized. The present antenna prototype’s overall dimensions can be readjusted according to any industrial and manufacturing requests.
Design of an 868 MHz Printed S-Shape Monopole Antenna1. Introduction
Most monopole antennas commonly refer to quarter wavelengths (λ/4); derivatives of dipoles where one element is folded into the ground (GND) and serves as the second radiator [1] [2]. The first derivatives of the monopole are the inverted-L and inverted-F antennas [3]-[6]. The antenna length is an important parameter and it is influenced by the dielectric constant of the material in the reactive near field. According to [2], calculation of the effective dielectric constant for both the half-wave dipole and the quarter-wave monopole is approximated in (1).
where h is the thickness of substrate or PCB material; W is the trace width of the dipole arms, decided to 2 mm in this case [7]-[11]. The working or effective wavelength for most antennas is then given by the formu-
la in (2), (2); knowing the free space wavelength, (3); whereby is the
speed of light and f is the working frequency in Hertz (Hz).
2. The Proposed s-Shape Monopole Antenna Structure
As per Equations (1)-(3), normal monopole antennas to work with industrial, scientific and medical (ISM) band of 868 MHz and 915 MHz would be presenting the length sizes according to Table 1.
Nonetheless, irrespective of the calculated lengths in Table 1, the proposed s-shape antenna will utilize almost half of the overall length. It is to note that s-shape, snakelike shape as well as Meander shape are interchangeable names [2] [7]. The proposed s-shaped monopole antenna’s design model is illustrated in Figure 1.
3. The Antenna Design, Analysis and Discussions
The software tool that was utilized for the design tasks is Ansoft HFSS [2]. According to the necessary problem solving steps, the solution type for the present model is set to driven terminal. It normally calculates the terminal-based s-parameters of multi-conductor transmission line ports. The s-shaped monopole antenna element together with the feed-line as well as the ground boards (top and bottom) are all assigned with finite conductivity boundary. It is one of the advanced boundary conditions. The rectangular port designed at 0.8 × 1.5 mm2 is assigned the lumped port excitation.
Theoretical monopole lengths
on a 0.8 mm thick FR-4 PCB,
Frequency (MHz)
(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
(mm)
868
345.6
199.7
50
100
915
327.8
189.5
47.4
94.8
The proposed antenna structure
3.1. Design Results3.1.1. The Antenna’s Return Loss (RL)
As a measure of the reflected energy from a transmitted signal, Figure 2 illustrates the maximum RL of −7.76 dB at 868 MHz.
It is practically known that the bigger the value of RL, the much less energy reflected back; the main reason of this kind of loss is due to mismatch conditions of the antenna with the input impedance. For that reason, the impedance matching will be applied which will reach to optimization results.
3.1.2. The Antenna’s Impedance
The impedance analysis by Smith Chart in Figure 3 results in mismatch where the point m1 is very far from the matching point.
The return loss (RL) before impedance matching, resonance at 868 MHZ
Smith chart impedance analysis
Reading the current Smith Chart in Figure 3, the actual antenna impedance is given by the calculation of the normalized input impedances, , such that; which give us values for the real and imaginary parts to be used during the Smith Chart impedance matching in Figure 4.
3.2. Impedance Matching
The Smith Chart impedance matching data points 1, 2 and 3 respectively, in Figure 4(a), were obtained by fixing a central frequency of 868 MHz, thus generating point 1; then by drawing a series capacitance from point 1 to point 2 and finally drawing a shunt inductance from point 2 to point 3. This means the pulling of antenna’s impedance to the central matching point. Under such conditions, the Smith chart system calculates the matching series capacitance to 4.4 pF while the shunt inductance is 8.7 nH as shown in Figure 4(b). The values are then implemented into the 3D model of Figure 1 as R-L-C impedance matching circuit, R = 50 Ω being the strip feed-line’s resistance.
3.3. Optimization Results
After building the matching circuit as shown in Figure 1, the new simulation results were considered optimal as presented in Figures 5-9. Those are Smith Chart impedance, radiation patterns, return loss and PCB fields overlay respectively. Regarding the capacitance and inductance sizes, the real implementation would adopt the standard manufacturing smaller sizes of such valued capacitance and inductance.
3.4. Discussions
According to the standards [8]-[11], the impedance matching [12] [13] brings a big improvement. For example, due to that impedance matching in our model, the return loss shifts from −7.76 dB to −16.5 dB. Another proof is the measurement by Smith Chart in Figure 5 which show the very big difference between unmatched conditions illustrated in Figure 3. Observing the return loss behavior in Figure 8, the 6.15 dB bandwidth is estimated to (0.915 - 0.826) MHz = 0.089 MHz; while for the 16.5 dB bandwidth is estimated to 0 MHz.
4. Conclusion
The PCB monopole s-shaped antenna design and simulation have been so successful that the obtained results are excellent, notably the omonidirectional radiation patterns shown in Figures 7-9. Due to the folding of the normally
(a) Smith chart impedance matching; (b) Smith chart impedance matching schematic diagram.
Impedance measuring by smith chart
EH plane radiation pattern
3D radiation pattern
Return loss
The PCB fields overlaying in two different view positions
known monopole antenna into a snakelike shape, the antenna has reached to a reduced size that can be easily implemented in all miniaturized transceivers and receivers operating in ISM 868MHz as well as in ISM 915 MHz with less return loss.
Acknowledgements
A lot of gratitude is addressed to the Government of People’s Republic of China to have supported and strengthened engineering research activities in the University of Science and Technology of China.
Cite this paper
Gerard Rushingabigwi,Liguo Sun, (2015) Design of an 868 MHz Printed S-Shape Monopole Antenna. Journal of Computer and Communications,03,49-55. doi: 10.4236/jcc.2015.33009
ReferencesZuffanelli, S., et al. (2014) An Impedance Matching Method for Optical Disc-Based UHF-RFID Tags. IEEE International Conference on RFID, 15-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/RFID.2014.681070Marrocco, G. (2008) The Art Of UHF RFID Antenna Design: Impedance Matching and Size Reduction Techniques. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 50, 66-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MAP.2008.4494504Richard, W. (2010) Antenna Selection Guide. Texas Instruments’ Application Note AN058, 1-44.
http://www.ti.com.cn/cn/lit/an/swra161b/swra161b.pdfRichard, W. (2013) Monopole PCB Antenna with Single or Dual Band Option. Texas Instruments Design Note DN024, 1-16. http://www.ti.com/lit/an/swra227e/swra227e.pdfAudun, A. (2009) 868 MHz, 915 MHz and 955 MHz Monopole PCB Antenna. Texas Instruments’ Design Note DN008, 1-16. http://www.docin.com/p-672547835.htmlFredrik, K. (2009) 868 MHz, 915 MHz, and 955 MHz Mo-nopole PCB Antenna. Texas Instruments Design Note DN024 Swra227d, 1-15. http://wenku.baidu.com/view/a17c353231126edb6f1a1071.htmlRiad, K. (2014) Compact Double Meandered Line Inverted-F Antenna for Outdoor Parking Wireless Car Detector. IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on Wireless and Mobile, 30-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/APWiMob.2014.6920279Soras, C., et al. (2002) Analysis and Design of an Inverted-F Antenna Printed on a PCMCIA Card for the 2.4 GHz ISM Band. IEEE Antennas Propagat Mag., 44, 37-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/74.997891Chen, H.-D., Chen, J.-S. and Cheng, Y.-T. (2003) Modi?ed In-verted-L Monopole Antenna for 2.4/5 GHz Dual-Band Operations. IEEE Electronics Letters, 39, 1567-1568. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/el:20031037 Ni, W. and Nakajima, N. (2010) Small Printed Inverted-L Monopole Antenna for Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access Wideband Operation. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation, 4, 1714-1719.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/iet-map.2009.0469Matthew, L. and Iboun, S. (2005) ISM-Band and Short Range Device Antennas. Texas Instruments’ Application Report Swra046a, 1-37. http://wenku.baidu.com/view/71b8d0126edb6f1aff001f8f.htmlMingyang, L. and Liu, M. (2014) Monopole Antenna and Dipole Antenna Design in HFSS Antenna Design. Chapter 3, 2nd Edition, Publishing House of Electronics Industry, Beijing, 22-43.Qiwu, T. and Erricolo, D. (2007) Comparison between Printed Folded Monopole and Inverted F Antennas for Wireless Portable Devices. Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, 4701-4704.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/APS.2007.4396593