<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ACES</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2160-0392</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/aces.2015.52014</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">ACES-54557</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Basic Engineering of a Two-Stage Process for Co-Upgrading Natural Gas and Petroleum Coke
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>orge</surname><given-names>Laine</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Maria</surname><given-names>Tosta</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Centro de Química, Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Caracas, Venezuela</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>jlaine@ivic.gob.ve(OL)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>04</day><month>03</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>05</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>129</fpage><lpage>133</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>20</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>8</month>	<year>March</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>11</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  This communication highlights the possibility of using a novel two-stage process for the co-upgrading of natural gas and petroleum coke into liquid hydrocarbons. The first stage consists of the catalytic dehydroaromatization of methane characterized by producing hydrogen and aromatics: benzene, naphtalene, toluene, etc. The non-reacted methane plus hydrogen and aromatics produced in the first stage are directed to the second stage to react with the petroleum coke. Basic engineering analysis of proposed two-stage process suggests light petroleum production of 160,000 bbl/day from 20,000 ton/day of petroleum coke actually by-produced from Venezuelan Orinoco’s heavy oil belt. Residual coke should be volatiles free therefore useful as a calcined coke.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Dehydroaromatization</kwd><kwd> Natural Gas</kwd><kwd> Petroleum Coke</kwd><kwd> Co-Upgrading</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction: The Two-Stage Process</title><p>The increasing demand for liquid fuels and the existing large world reserves of natural gas make attractive the direct transformation of it into more desirable feedstocks. On the other hand, the increasing by-production of petroleum coke due to the processing of heavy oils (e.g., Orinoco bitumen, Alberta tar sands, etc.) opens the perspective of reacting natural gas with coke to obtain liquid hydrocarbons.</p><p>The possibility of joining these two processes: The direct transformation of natural gas and the reaction of natural gas with coke, both together into a two-stage process are presented in this communication.</p><p>Regarding the first stage, the process hereby considered is methane deshydroaromatization (MDA), which would transform natural gas into valuable high-octane number aromatic fuels beside of hydrogen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54557-ref1">1</xref>] .</p><p>In connection with the second stage: methane reaction with coke (MRC), some reports deal with the reaction of methane with coal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54557-ref2">2</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54557-ref6">6</xref>] . However, to the author’s knowledge, reports regarding reaction of methane with coke are not found in the relevant literature related to hydrocarbon processing.</p><p>It should be remarked that processes most widely employed for upgrading separately either natural gas or coal raw materials, are referred to as indirect liquefaction, involving steam reforming of the raw material to produce syngas (CO + H<sub>2</sub>) for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54557-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>In the case of the others coal upgrading processes referred to as direct liquefaction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54557-ref8">8</xref>] , most attention has been paid to H<sub>2</sub> as the main gas reactant, using solvents in order to improve H<sub>2</sub> diffusion to the carbon matrix, including hydrogen-donor solvents such as tetralin, cyclohexane, etc. Nevertheless, these direct coal liquefactions require the costly and highly CO<sub>2</sub> footprint technology for producing H<sub>2</sub> reactant. The use of natural gas instead of H<sub>2</sub> for liquefaction, as hereby proposed, would save this obstacle.</p><p>Within the above scope, this communication reviews some information available in order to carry an analysis of the basic engineering of the proposed two stages co-upgrading of natural gas and petroleum coke.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Reactions Involved</title><p>First approximation is to assume that natural gas is CH<sub>4</sub>, and coke is pure C.</p><p>For MDA stage, it is assumed to involve the production of benzene [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54557-ref1">1</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.54557-formula314"><label>(I)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-3700540x5.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Notice that other products expected in MDA, e.g., toluene and naphthalene, imply reaction ratio H<sub>2</sub>/CH<sub>4</sub> (1.4 and 1.6 respectively) similar than that of benzene (1.5)</p><p>For the sake of simplicity, MRC stage is assumed to involve the production of alkanes:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.54557-formula315"><label>(II)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-3700540x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Similarly, for the reaction of coke with hydrogen coming from MDA stage:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.54557-formula316"><label>(III)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-3700540x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Curiously, solid carbon is not only a reactant for gasification and liquefaction, the solid carbon can also behave as a catalyst decomposing methane to produce hydrogen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54557-ref9">9</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54557-ref10">10</xref>] and mixtures of coke and unsaturated hydrocarbons such as C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>2</sub>, C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub> and benzene.</p><p>Hydrogen is reported to synergistically promote liquefaction function of CH<sub>4</sub> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54557-ref3">3</xref>] ; a key factor for using the first stage MDA gas outlet (CH<sub>4</sub> + H<sub>2</sub>) to feed MRC stage.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref> shows atomic ratios H/C for the existing types of fossil hydrocarbos. Notice GTL (gas-to-liquid) and CTL (coals (or coke)-to-liquids) routes are in fact connected in the present two-stage proposal.</p><p>The basic engineering analysis has been carried out taking into account the reported literature data for the two individual reactions: MDA and MRC. It is hereby remarked the limitation of assuming coke behaves in a similar manner as coal. Certainly, coal, particularly those with a high H/C ratio should be liquified easier than low H/C ratio raw materials like coke or anthracite coal (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>). However, high Ni and V contents, an important characteristic of petroleum coke differentiating it from coals, might act as hydrogenation catalysts favouring liquefaction, but this is a matter requiring more scientific evidence.</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Atomic ratios H/C of fossil fuels. The routes GTL: natural gas to liquids, and CTL: coals (or coke) to liquids are combined in the present co-upgrading process</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-3700540x8.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Basic Engineering Analysis</title><sec id="s3_1"><title>3.1. MDA Stage</title><p>Previous works on MDA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54557-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54557-ref11">11</xref>] have shown that most promising catalysts results from the combination of a transition metal with a zeolite. Particularly, molybdenum impregnated on a HZSM-5 zeolite support is one of the catalysts most studied. The unusual resistance to deactivation by carbon deposition of that zeolite [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54557-ref12">12</xref>] could probably be one of the key factors for functioning in MDA. Furthermore, making-up methane feed with a small concentration of hydrogen plus steam, is reported to stabilize MDA suppressing deactivation effectively [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54557-ref13">13</xref>] . Nevertheless, previous reports [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54557-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54557-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54557-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54557-ref14">14</xref>] suggest low methane conversions (~10%) for steady state MDA.</p><p>For MDA, a trickled bed reactor is recommended where both natural gas and the liquid products flow down across a bed of pelletized Mo/HZSM-5 catalyst. It should be anticipated the necessity for catalyst regeneration in the case that deactivation by carbon deposition is not stabilized. One alternative is to stop MDA stage by- passing methane directly to MRC stage while catalyst regenerating. Another alternative is to employ two parallel reactors to allow catalyst regeneration in one reactor while carrying MDA in the other.</p><p>Two alternatives are possible for connecting MDA to MRC: one is to separate the liquid MDA products leaving non-reacted CH<sub>4</sub> plus H<sub>2</sub> product to be directed as the gaseous reactants for MRC. The other is to direct all MDA output to MRC. This latter is backed by recent report suggesting a synergistic effect between coal pyrolysis and methane aromatization [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54557-ref15">15</xref>] . Certainly, the aromatics produced by MDA may improve diffusion of the gas reactants to the carbonaceous surface enhancing liquefaction.</p></sec><sec id="s3_2"><title>3.2. MRC Stage</title><p>Catalytic agents and/or solvents should be introduced for MRC. It is well known that the use of solvents improves coal liquefaction. Previous experiments on the liquefaction with H<sub>2</sub> of a Venezuelan coal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54557-ref16">16</xref>] demonstrated the advantage of using H-donor solvents. Therefore, in addition to the aromatics coming from MDA, certain fraction of liquids produced in MRC stage should be pre-treated with H<sub>2</sub> and recycled to function as H-donor solvent for the liquefaction.</p><p>Early experiments using batch reactor yield high conversions (~50%) when reacting CH<sub>4</sub> and H<sub>2</sub> mixtures with coal [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54557-ref3">3</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54557-ref5">5</xref>] , as well as in the case of Venezuelan heavy oil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54557-ref17">17</xref>] . The possibility of adapting two parallel batch reactors operating similarly as in delayed coking processes may be one alternative to consider for MRC.</p><p>Several other alternatives may be investigated for continues flow MRC process reactor: A fluidized-bed or ebullated-bed as employed in the H-coal direct-liquefaction process [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54557-ref8">8</xref>] should be taken into account. The use of small coke particle size is recommended in order to ensure more solid surface area that should improve reactant gas diffusion phenomena to favor coke reaction kinetics. Tubular reactors where a slurry of the carbon powder plus a solvent containing dissolved gases (CH<sub>4</sub> + H<sub>2</sub>) flowing continuously have also been experimented [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54557-ref4">4</xref>] , as well as microwave plasma reactor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54557-ref6">6</xref>] and flash pyrolysis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54557-ref2">2</xref>] both under CH<sub>4</sub> supply. A novel reactor experimented using Venezuelan petroleum coke under steam gasification employing solar energy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54557-ref18">18</xref>] could also be considered introducing the variance of employing CH<sub>4</sub> instead of steam.</p><p>Coke liquefaction residue extracted from MRC may be an appropriate raw material for activated carbon manufacture as proposed else where [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54557-ref19">19</xref>] . In addition, it could have properties similar to calcined coke, a commercial material useful for application in metallurgy and other carbon consuming industries. The possible application of the residual coke for agriculture and desert greening as proposed earlier [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54557-ref20">20</xref>] should also be investigated further.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows a basic flow diagram for the proposed two-stage process for co-upgrading natural gas and petroleum coke into liquid hydrocarbons. Notice that non-reacted gases are recycled to MRC stage after stripping of H<sub>2</sub>. In addition, certain distillate fraction is recycled to MRC reactor to function as solvent to enhance reactant gas diffusion to solid. Therefore, H<sub>2</sub> stripping from MRC output gases may also be available for the hydrotreating reactor as show in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, an operation intended to produce required hydrogen donor solvent.</p><p>Basic engineering analysis employing reactions I and II (n = 8), assuming coke is the limiting reactant employing excess methane, and discrete values of MDA conversion (10%) and coke conversion (30%) to light petroleum, derived from the literature investigated; therefore, it is estimated that 1.500 m<sup>3</sup> (1 atm, 25˚C) of natural gas is required to produce 8 bbl of light petroleum for each ton of petroleum coke processed. Venezuelan petroleum coke produced today (20,000 ton/day) would be equivalent to 160.000 bbl/day of light petroleum using this process.</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Flow diagram of the two-stage co-upgrading process, showing the two reactors (MDA and MRC) and other operational units</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/3-3700540x9.png"/></fig></sec></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>Analysis of the presently proposed co-upgrading of natural gas and petroleum coke precedes a more detailed research in order to optimize operational conditions and equipment specifications. As a result of the Venezuelan large off-shore natural gas reserves and petroleum coke by produced from the Orinoco belt, development of detailed engineering design for pilot plant should be furthermore investigated.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.54557-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ma, S.Q., Guo, X.G., Zhao, L.X., Scottc, S. and Bao, X.H. (2013) Recent Progress in Methane Dehydroaromatization: From Laboratory Curiosities to Promising Technology. Review. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 22, 1-20.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2095-4956(13)60001-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54557-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Calkins, W.H. and Bonifaz, C. (1984) Coal Flash Pyrolysis: 5. Pyrolysis in an Atmosphere of Methane. Fuel, 63, 1716-1719. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(84)90106-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54557-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Voigtmann, M.F., Chen, M. and Batts, B.D. (1995) Coal Pyrolysis with Methane in a Reducing Environment. Coal Science and Technology, 24, 1399-1402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9449(06)80066-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54557-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cai, J.Q., Wang, Y.P. and Huang, Q.W. (2008) Rapid Liquefaction of Longkou Lignite Coal by Using a Tubular Reactor under Methane Atmosphere. Fuel, 87, 3388-3392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2008.06.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54557-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Yang, K., Batts, B.D., Wilson, M.A., Gorbaty, M.L., Maa, P.S., Long, M.A., He, S.X.J. and Attalla, M.I. (1997) Reaction of Methane with Coal. Fuel, 76, 1105-1115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(97)00134-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54557-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kamei, O., Onoe, K., Marushima, W. and Yamaguchi, T. (1998) Brown Coal Conversion by Microwave Plasma Reactions under Successive Supply of Methane. Fuel, 77, 1503-1506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(98)00055-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54557-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Dry, M.E. (1981) The Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. In: Anderson, J.R. and Boudart, M., Eds., Catalysis Science and Technology, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Vol. 1, 159-255.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54557-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Winslow, J. and Schmetz, E. (2009) Direct Coal Liquefaction Overview Presented to NETL.  
http://bellona.org/filearchive/fil_Direct_Coal_Liquefaction_Overview.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54557-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Muradov, N., Smith, F. and Raissi, A. (2005) Catalytic Activity of Carbons for Methane Decomposition Reaction. Catalysis Today, 102, 225-233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2005.02.018</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54557-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bai, Z.Q., Chen, H.K., Li, W. and Li, B.Q. (2006) Hydrogen Production by Methane Decomposition over Coal Char. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 31, 899-905. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.08.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54557-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Quintero, D., Padilla, D., Labady, M. and Laine, J. (2007) A Transient Behavior in the Initial Production of Aromatic Compounds from Methane Catalyzed by Mo/HZSM-5. Catalysis Letters, 118, 244-247.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10562-007-9177-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54557-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Heinemann, H. (1981) A Brief History of Industrial Catalysis. In: Anderson, J.R. and Boudart, M., Eds., Catalysis Science and Technology, Vol. 1, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1-41.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54557-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ma, H.T., Kojima, R., Kikuchi, S. and Ichikawa, M. (2005) Effective Coke Removal in Methane to Benzene (MTB) Reaction on Mo/HZSM-5 Catalyst by H2 and H2O Co-Addition to Methane. Catalysis Letters, 104, 63-66.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10562-005-7437-y</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54557-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Shu, Y.Y., Ma, D., Xu, L.Y., Xu, Y.D. and Bao, X.H. (2000) Methane Dehydro-Aromatization over Mo/MCM-22 Catalysts: A Highly Selective Catalyst for the Formation of Benzene. Catalysis Letters, 70, 67-73.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1019079603279</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54557-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jin, L.J., Zhou, X., He, X.F. and Hu, H.Q. (2013) Integrated Coal Pyrolysis with Methane Aromatization over Mo/HZSM-5 for Improving Tar Yield. Fuel, 114, 187-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.01.024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54557-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Laine, J. and Becerra, O. (1985) A Semi-Continuous Flow Reactor Technique for Coal Liquefaction Studies. Fuel Processing Technology, 11, 127-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-3820(85)90023-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54557-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ovalles, C., Hamana, A., Rojas, I. and Bolívar, R.A. (1995) Upgrading of Extra-Heavy Crude Oil by Direct Use of Methane in the Presence of Water: Deuterium-Labelled Experiments and Mechanistic Considerations. Fuel, 74, 1162-1168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(95)00071-C</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54557-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Z’Graggen, A., Haueter, P., Trommer, D., Romero, M., de Jesus, J.C. and Steinfeld, A. (2006) Hydrogen Production by Steam-Gasification of Petroleum Coke Using Concentrated Solar Power—II Reactor Design, Testing, and Modeling. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 31, 797-811. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.06.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54557-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhang, J.B., Jin, L.J., He, X.F., Liu, S.B. and Hu, H.Q. (2011) Catalytic Methane Decomposition over Activated Carbons Prepared from Direct Coal Liquefaction Residue by KOH Activation with Addition of SiO2 or SBA-15. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36, 8978-8984. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.04.205</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54557-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Laine, J. (2012) Perspective of the Preparation of Agrichars Using Fossil Hydrocarbon Coke. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 5597-5602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.06.009</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>