<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">CS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Circuits and Systems</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-1285</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/cs.2015.63005</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">CS-54528</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Computer Science&amp;Communications</subject><subject> Engineering</subject><subject> Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  A Single Resistor Tunable Grounded Capacitor Dual-Input Differentiator
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>oushick</surname><given-names>Mathur</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Palaniandavar</surname><given-names>Venkateswaran</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rabindranath</surname><given-names>Nandi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Electronics &amp;amp; Telecommunication Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Electronics &amp;amp; Communication Engineering, UIT, University of Burdwan, Bardhaman, India</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>kousik.mathur@gmail.com(OM)</email>;<email>pvwn@ieee.org(PV)</email>;<email>robnon@ieee.org(RN)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>11</day><month>03</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>03</issue><fpage>49</fpage><lpage>54</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>18</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>9</month>	<year>March</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>11</day>	<month>March</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  A new current feedback amplifier (CFA) based dual-input differentiator (DID) design with grounded capacitor is presented; its time constant (
  τ<sub>o</sub>) is independently tunable by a single resistor. The proposed circuit yields a true DID function with ideal CFA devices. Analysis with nonideal devices having parasitic capacitance (
  C<sub>p</sub>) shows extremely low but finite phase error (
  θ<sub>e</sub>); suitable design 
  θ<sub>e</sub> could be minimized significantly. The design is practically active-insensitive relative to port mismatch errors (
  ε) of the active element. An allpass phase shifter circuit implementation is derived with slight modification of the differentiator. Satisfactory experimental results had been verified on typical wave processing and phase-selective filter design applications.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>CFA</kwd><kwd> Tunable Differentiator</kwd><kwd> Dual-Input Differentiator</kwd><kwd> Wave Shaper</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Differentiator and integrator functional blocks find a variety of applications in signal conditioning, wave pro- cessing and shaping, as process controller, phase compensator, and as pre-emphasis unit in radio engineering [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54528-ref1">1</xref>] . A high-quality (q) differentiator with true differential input capability is useful for enhanced signal handling characteristics. The literature shows a number of single-input differentiator circuit design schemes using various types of active building blocks, such as voltage operational amplifier (VOA) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54528-ref2">2</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54528-ref4">4</xref>] , current conveyor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54528-ref5">5</xref>] and CFA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54528-ref6">6</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54528-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><p>A new grounded capacitor single resistor tunable true dual-input differentiator design using the CFA-844 building block is presented in this work. The CFA device is essentially a current mode element with improved features compared to the ubiquitous VOA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54528-ref10">10</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54528-ref12">12</xref>] . The CFA provides unity current gain whereby both voltage-source and current-source output nodes are available such that cascadability for either type of signals is readily realizable. Other versatile properties [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54528-ref12">12</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54528-ref14">14</xref>] of the device relative to analog signal processing functional design, are improved slew-rate, accuracy and effective bandwidth that is nearly gain-independent. Since such a design is not yet reported, it therefore appears appropriate to propose a true dual-input high-q differentiator circuit design based on the CFA device―leading to the motivation of this research work.</p><p>Analysis is carried out with both ideal and nonideal models of the device wherein the effects of the finite errors <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in port transfer ratios and parasitic shunt r<sub>p</sub>C<sub>p</sub> arms appearing at the current source z-node are examined. As per databook [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54528-ref15">15</xref>] , typical values of these shunt components are in the range of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> V.d.c. Albeit effects of ε are seen to be insignificant that of the parasitics introduce finite phase error <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x10.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which tend to limit the higher side of the usable frequency range. By appropriate design of nominal passive components, the phase error could be minimized without affecting the single tunability feature. The nominal values of circuit resistors are chosen in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> range such that their ratios relative to <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x12.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are extremely small, and hence may be neglected. The practical performance of the proposed DID had been verified satisfactorily with both PSPICE Macromodel [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54528-ref16">16</xref>] simulation and by hardware tests.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Analysis and Design</title><p>The CFA based proposed DID topology is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. The nodal relations of the AD-844 CFA element is <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>; where α, β and δ denote the port transfer ratios. These are usually expressed by some small error <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> terms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54528-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54528-ref17">17</xref>] as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. For an ideal device these errors vanish leading to unity transfer ratios. We now present the analysis of the DID circuit assuming<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>; the voltage transfer relation is</p><disp-formula id="scirp.54528-formula77"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x19.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x20.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Writing <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and assuming ideal devices, we get the transfer from Equation (1) as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.54528-formula78"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x23.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Note that no component matching constraint is needed to derive the transfer function in Equation (2) of the DID; time constant <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x24.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> may be tuned independently by the grounded resistor (R<sub>o</sub>) while additional variation may also be conveniently achieved by ratio-k. With nonideal devices, Equation (1) modifies to</p><disp-formula id="scirp.54528-formula79"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x25.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Also the noninverting input signal is slightly reduced by the factor<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Literature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54528-ref8">8</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54528-ref13">13</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54528-ref17">17</xref>] indicates that error magnitudes are quite low in a typical range of<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, i.e., hence V<sub>1</sub> input signal degeneration is negligible. The active sensitivity is<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x27.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x28.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x29.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Effects of Parasitic Components</title><p>Re-examination of the circuit in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>, assuming finite parasitic shunt―<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x30.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>components at current source z-nodes of the CFAs, yields the following normalized transfer function</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> DID topology with grounded capacitor</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x31.png"/></fig><disp-formula id="scirp.54528-formula80"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x32.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Since the ratios of nominal resistors with respect to parasitic ones are extremely low, these are neglected<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The total phase shift <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x33.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> in frequency-re- sponse domain of the DID is therefore</p><disp-formula id="scirp.54528-formula81"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x37.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> assuming<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Values of parasitic capacitances are in pF range (say 4 - 5 pF) and nominal resistance values are in <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> range (say<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>), by which we may estimate the higher end of usable frequency as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x38.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x39.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x42.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x43.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x44.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></p><p>The differentiator quality fator (q) is estimated by writing <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which defines<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x45.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x46.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. From Equation (4) we derive</p><disp-formula id="scirp.54528-formula82"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x47.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Equation (6) may be simplified to obtain a practical value of q after assuming <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> this yields<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x48.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x49.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x50.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The proposed DID therefore offers high-quality feature within a stipulated frequency- range and the design is practically active-insensitive to port errors (ε).</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Design Application</title><p>As an application of the differentiator, we now present the design of a first order allpass (AP) function realization. The differentiator circuit is slightly modified to derive the AP filter as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>; analysis shows constant gain-magnitude (H<sub>o</sub>) with variable phase (ψ), given by</p><disp-formula id="scirp.54528-formula83"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x51.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and gain<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x52.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x53.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>; these parameters are independently tunable.</p><p>With<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, one gets the non-minimum phase function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x54.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x55.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which yields the phase</p><disp-formula id="scirp.54528-formula84"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x56.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Effects of parasitic capacitances are examined next; re-analysis yields the modified transfer function as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.54528-formula85"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x57.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. Thus even with finite para-</p><p>sitic capacitances, the circuit provides a non-minimum phase function. Since <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> we get<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>,</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> AP filter design</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x62.png"/></fig><p>hence the phase components of numerator and denominator polynomials in Equation (9) are symmetrical. Writing <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, we get the slightly altered phase response as</p><disp-formula id="scirp.54528-formula86"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x65.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The phase response is therefore tunable in the nominal range and is seen to be practically unaffected by<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The flat-gain is slightly attenuated at higher frequencies due to the parasitic pole at <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which may extend upto about 20 MHz as discussed in the earlier section.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Experimental Results</title><p>Practical responses of both the DID and phase-selective AP filter had been measured using hardware circuit design employing readily available AD-844 type CFA device, and by PSPICE macromodel simulation; these are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>. The DID is tested in time-domain by applying equal but antiphase triangular-wave input signals while its phase-response is observed in frequency-domain, so as to measure <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> at appropriately chosen values of CR<sub>o</sub>; these are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(a) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(b). The common mode characteristics of the DID is observed by applying equal amplitude sinusoid inputs while the CMRR had been measured experimentally as equal to 55 dB at 100 KHz and 48 dB at 1 MHz; deviation of the CMRR at higher end of frequency is owing to the noise accentuation property [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54528-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54528-ref18">18</xref>] of differentiation function. Measured test response of the AP filter in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>(c) indicates a phase deviation of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> only at the select frequency of 500 KHz.</p><p>Next error estimation is carried out on the magnitude response of the DID for triangular to square wave conversion; these are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> below which shows error on measured output voltage as <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> being independently tuned by<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusion</title><p>A new CFA based dual-input high-quality active dual-input differentiator (DID) circuit realization scheme is presented. The advantages of the proposed design are true differentiation function implementation using a grounded capacitor while the time constant is tunable by a single resistor―features suitable for microminiaturization. The gain factor of the circuit may also be conveniently adjusted by a resistor ratio. CFA-based DID design is not readily available in the literature. Such dual-input differentiators are conveniently used as the error- subtractor cum rate controller in a process control loop. All the tunability features of the DID here are independently controllable without requiring any component matching constraint. Analysis with nonideal devices has been carried out which exhibits practically active-insensitive nature of the design. Investigation assuming finite device parasitic indicates certain phase deviation <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> at higher ends of usable frequency range of about 1 MHz. The proposed DID structure is utilized here in the design of a first-order phase-selective allpass function with high input impedance. The phase variation is in the range of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x73.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x74.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> which is tunable by a resistor at constant gain magnitude (H<sub>o</sub>) adjustable by another resistor ratio. Test response indicates a phase deviation of</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Measured response of DID for error (%V<sub>e</sub>) estimation</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x75.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >Square-wave <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x76.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> (volt)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  ><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x77.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula></th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >R<sub>o</sub> (KΩ)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C = 100 pF</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Theoretical</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hardware</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Simulation</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hardware</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Simulation</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.30</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.70</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.1</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Anti-phase triangular wave input signals V<sub>1</sub> = −V<sub>2</sub> = 2 volt(pp) at 1 MHz with k = 1.</p><fig-group id="fig3"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Responses of DID and AP filter. (a) Triangular wave to output square wave (V<sub>o</sub>) conversion with antiphase input signals V<sub>1</sub> = −V<sub>2</sub> = 2 V(pp) at f = 1 MHz and C = 100 pF, R<sub>o</sub> = 2.5 KΩ, k = 1; f<sub>o</sub> = 0.16/CR<sub>o</sub>; (b) DID phase response; (c) AP phase response tested with R = 2 KΩ, C = 160 pF, λ = 2, C = 160 pF, C<sub>p</sub> ≈ 5.7 pF (measured) and H<sub>o</sub> = 1; dotted curve: theoretical; solid curve: practical.</title></caption><fig id ="fig3_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x78.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig3_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x79.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig3_3"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x80.png"/></fig></fig-group><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-7600375x81.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>due to the device parasitics at the select frequency of 500 KHz. All these responses have been verified experimentally.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.54528-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Pratt, T. and Bostian, C.W. (2006) Satellite Communications. John Wiley &amp; Sons, Hoboken.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54528-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Horrocks, D.H. (1974) A Noninverting Differentiator Using a Single Operational Amplifier. International Journal of Electronics, 37, 433-434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207217408900541</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54528-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nandi, R. (1979) New Grounded Capacitor Ideal Differentiators. Proceedings of the IEEE, 67, 685-687.http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1979.11299</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54528-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bandyopadhyay, A.K. and Nandi, R. (1978) True Noninverting Integrators with Single Grounded Capacitor. Proceedings of the IEEE, 66, 596-597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1978.10967</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54528-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Patranabis, D. and Ghosh, D.K. (1984) Integrators and Differentiators with Current Conveyors. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, 31, 567-569. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TCS.1984.1085535</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54528-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lee, J.L. and Liu, S.I. (2001) Integrator and Differentiator with Time Constant Multiplication Using Current Feedback Amplifier. Electronics Letters, 37, 331-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/el:20010252</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54528-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Nagaria</surname><given-names> R.K. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2008</year>)<article-title>On the New Design of CFA Based Voltage Controlled Integrator/Differentiator Suitable for Analog Signal Processing</article-title><source> WSEAS Transactions on Electronics</source><volume> 6</volume>,<fpage> 232</fpage>-<lpage>237</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54528-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nandi, R., Sanyal, S.K. and Bandyopadhyay, T.K. (2009) Single CFA Based Integrator, Differentiator, Filter and Sinusoid Oscillator. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 58, 2557-2564. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2009.2014625</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54528-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Horng, J.W. and Huang, G.T. (2013) A Grounded Capacitor Differentiator Using Current Feedback Amplifer. Circuits and Systems, 4, 233-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/cs.2013.42031</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54528-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tomazou, C. and Lidgey, J. (1994) Current Feedback Op-Amp: A Blessing in Disguise. IEEE Circuits &amp; Devices Magazine, 10, 34-37.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54528-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Palumbo, G. and Pennisi, S. (2001) Current Feedback Amplifiers versus Voltage Operational Amplifiers. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, 48, 617-623. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/81.922465</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54528-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gift, S.J.G. and Maundy, B. (2005) Improving the Bandwidth Gain-Independence and Accuracy of the Current Feedback Amplifier. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II, 52, 136-139.http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TCSII.2004.842043</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54528-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tammam, A.A., Hayatleh, K., Ben-Esmael, M., Terzopoulos, N. and Sebu, C. (2014) Critical Review of the Circuit Architecture of the CFOA. International Journal of Electronics, 101, 441-451.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207217.2013.780309</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54528-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Franco</surname><given-names> S. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1989</year>)<article-title>Current Feedback Amplifiers Benefit High Speed Designs</article-title><source> EDN</source><volume> 34</volume>,<fpage> 161</fpage>-<lpage>172</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54528-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Analog Devices (1990) Linear Products Databook. Norwood, MA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54528-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Microsim Corporation (1992) Macromodel of AD-844 AN in PSPICE Library. Irvine, CA.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54528-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Cha, H.W., Ogawa, S. and Watanabe, K. (1998) Class-A CMOS Current Conveyors. IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communication &amp; Computer Sciences, E81-A, 1164-1167.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54528-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Terman, F.E. and Pettit, J.M. (1952) Electronic Measurements. McGraw-Hill Publishing, New York.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>