<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">MSA</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Materials Sciences and Applications</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2153-117X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/msa.2015.62020</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">MSA-54022</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Chemistry&amp;Materials Science</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Recovery of Gold and Silver and Removal of Copper, Zinc and Lead Ions in Pregnant and Barren Cyanide Solutions
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>abriela</surname><given-names>Figueroa</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jesus</surname><given-names>L. Valenzuela</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Jose</surname><given-names>R. Parga</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Victor</surname><given-names>Vazquez</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Alejandro</surname><given-names>Valenzuela</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Materials Science, Technological Institute of Saltillo, Saltillo, Mexico</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Chemical Engineering and Metallurgy, University of Sonora, Hermosillo, Mexico</addr-line></aff><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>23</day><month>01</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>171</fpage><lpage>182</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>18</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>9</month>	<year>February</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>12</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  Over the past decade the concern about toxic metals in freshwater has increased. Environmental laws such as the Clean Water Act have forced industries that produce metal containing wastewater to treat their wastewater prior to discharge. The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of a novel method for the minimization of heavy metals in the wastewater from the mining industry. A very promising electrochemical treatment technique that does not require chemical additions is electrocoagulation (EC) and sulphide precipitation. The present study has been done for the recovery of gold and silver contained in pregnant solution from the cyanidation process using the electrocoagulation technology with iron electrodes; that is a developed alternative technology for the Merril-Crowe process. The average gold and silver content in pregnant solution was 4.27 and 283 ppm respectively and the recoveries were 92% for gold and 95% for silver, with optimum operating parameters of pH 10, residence time of 20 minutes and addition of sodium chloride of 4 gr/L. The results of precipitation process show that the elimination of lead, zinc, cooper and iron ions from the barren solution was successful, with optimum operating parameters of pH 3 and residence time of 15 minutes, and the recoveries were 99% of these ions. Finally the characterization of the solid products of gold and silver formed during the EC process with Scanning Electronic Microscope was performed. Results suggest that magnetite particles and amorphous iron oxyhydroxides (lepidocrocite) were present.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Electrochemical Process</kwd><kwd> Precipitation Process</kwd><kwd> Gold and Silver Cyanides</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Gold and silver are the most popular precious metals for investors. Early studies on the dissolution of gold in cyanide solution in the presence of sulfide minerals have shown that heavy metal components, such as Cu, Pb, Fe and Zn cyanide ions, significantly increase the consumption of both cyanide and oxygen [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54022-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54022-ref2">2</xref>] . In addition, the sulfide component has been shown to have a strong impact on the gold leaching kinetics [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54022-ref3">3</xref>] - [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54022-ref5">5</xref>] . The leaching behavior of gold in the presence of sulfide minerals depended strongly on both the solubility of the sulfides and the oxygen concentration in the solution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54022-ref5">5</xref>] . Based on the experiments observation, it is postulated that sulfide ions (formed by the decomposition of sulfide minerals) show detrimental effect on the cyanidation kinetics of gold and silver.</p><p>Cyanidation has been used for over 100 years to extract precious metals from sulfide ores. Despite this fact, the reactions involved are not fully understood. More gold is recovered by cyanidation than by any other process. In cyanidation, metallic gold is oxidized and dissolved in an alkaline cyanide solution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54022-ref6">6</xref>] . The oxidant employed is atmospheric oxygen, which, in the presence of an aqueous solution of sodium cyanide, causes the dissolution of gold and the formation of gold cyanide and sodium hydroxide, according to the so-called Elsner reaction (Equations (1) and (2)) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54022-ref7">7</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.54022-formula1129"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7701518x6.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.54022-formula1130"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7701518x7.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The cyanide concentration determines the rate of anodic gold dissolution while the oxygen reduction rate is dependent on the concentration of dissolved oxygen. In the cyanidation process, free cyanide ions in solution can be provided only at pH &gt; 9.3. The pH of the pulp can be increased with the additions of alkali hydroxides (NaOH, KOH, Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub>, etc.), known as proactive alkalis. Also, details of this electrochemical reaction have received considerable attention, and under certain circumstances, the reaction is limited by the coupled diffusion of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7701518x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and O<sub>2</sub> to the gold surface. Therefore, the initial rate of gold dissolution is largely controlled by the factors such as cyanide and oxygen concentrate, pH, solid-liquid interface, Eh of the slurry, alkalies, particle size and temperature [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54022-ref8">8</xref>] .</p><p>In the metallurgical operation plants, the concentration of cyanide used to dissolve gold in ores is typically higher than the stoichiometric ratio, since other minerals get dissolved by cyanide. Free cyanide produces complexes with several metallic species, especially transition metals of copper, zinc and iron, which show a broad variation in both stability and solubility, as discussed by Rehman [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54022-ref9">9</xref>] .</p><disp-formula id="scirp.54022-formula1131"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7701518x9.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Most common copper minerals are soluble in the dilute cyanide solution, typically found in leach conditions during the gold cyanidation process. Minerals such as azurite and malachite are fast leached and are soluble in dilute cyanide solutions [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54022-ref10">10</xref>] . The next process for recovery gold and silver from the pregnant cyanide solutions is the Merrill Crowe and the increasingly stringent limitations on the purity of the Dore for the refining process have created a growing interest on the development of a novel process for the removal of precious metals from the pregnant cyanide solution before cementation in the filter press [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54022-ref6">6</xref>] .</p><p>In general, the quality of precipitate in the cyanidation process will depend upon the nature of the ore being treated. The richer the pregnant solution is, the better the quality of the precipitate of gold and silver is, although this is modified by the presence of metals, such as copper, lead, zinc and iron. This behavior can be explained from <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> of the electromotive force of the metals [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54022-ref11">11</xref>] .</p><p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, each member displaces each succeeding member from salt solution; that is, metallic zinc replaces copper, silver and gold; copper replaces silver; lead replaces gold; platinum replaces gold, and so forth. However it should be noted that these reactions are not reversible and that the metals above hydrogen are soluble in acids while the metals below hydrogen are insoluble in acids. Therefore, cementation is a process in which a</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Electromotive series of the metals</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Metal/V</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Metal/V</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Metal/V</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn―0.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu―0.34</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fe―0.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >H<sub>2</sub>―0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ag―0.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pb―0.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >Au―1.68</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>metal ion in solution is precipitated onto more electronegative metal surfaces.</p><p>Commonly the metals found in the precipitate are: gold, silver, copper, arsenic, lead and iron. This may be due to precipitation of base metals. Silica is found due to improved clarification, and it is in colloidal form. Lime is found mainly due to very high protective alkalinity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54022-ref12">12</xref>] . Therefore, an acid treatment of precipitates is needed in order to remove undissolved copper, zinc and iron. Treatments with sulfuric or hydrochloric acids are the most common. When sulfuric acid is used, it is used as a 10% - 20% solution in water. The acid is added gradually to the precipitate and the whole mixture is kept well stirred in a steel tank. Due to the formation of gases, an appropriate fume hood must be used. The precipitate or sludge is washed with warm acid water after acid leaching treatment for removing the soluble copper-zinc sulfates and other salts. The precipitate of gold and silver with remaining lead is then dried and prepared for melting. Lead in the precipitate lowers the quality of the Dore [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54022-ref13">13</xref>] . Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the use of a very promising electrochemical treatment technique that does not require chemical additions like electrocoagulation (EC) with iron electrodes for the recovery of gold and silver from the pregnant solution and for the minimization of heavy metals in the barren solution from the filter press because of using the sulphide precipitation process.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Electrocoagulation Process for Precious Metals Recovery</title><p>The EC process operates on the principle that the coagulation is caused by electrolytically produced ions from iron and aluminum anodes, which corrode during electrolysis and cause the release of contaminants from an aqueous medium. The idea in flowing EC techniques is to take advantage of the combined effects of electrolysis gases (H<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>2</sub>) and the production of polyvalent cations from the oxidation of corrodible anodes such as (Fe and Al). These consumable or sacrificial metal electrodes are used to continuously produce the metal ions in the vicinity of the anode.</p><p>The EC process can be considered as an accelerated, corrosion process was green rust (GR) is an intermediate product that is responsible for the removal of contaminants (suspended and dissolved solids, metals, organic compounds, etc.). EC mechanisms may involve oxidation, reduction, decomposition, deposition, coagulation, absorption, adsorption, precipitation and flotation. EC operates on the principle that hydrolized cations produced electrolytically from iron and/or aluminum anodes enhance the coagulation of contaminants from an aqueous medium.</p><p>In the EC technique, the production of polyvalent cations from the oxidation of the sacrificial anodes (Al or Fe) and the production of electrolysis gases (O<sub>2</sub> and/or H<sub>2</sub>) are directly proportional to the amount of current applied (Faraday’s law). The electrolysis gases enhance the froth flotation of the coagulant material [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54022-ref14">14</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54022-ref16">16</xref>] . A schematic representation of the EC process is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>. As mentioned above, the gas bubbles produced by the electrolysis carry the pollutant to the top of the solution where it is concentrated, collected and removed. The removal mechanisms in EC may involve oxidation, reduction, decomposition, deposition, coagulation, absorption, adsorption, precipitation and flotation.</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Schematic diagram of the electrocoagulation process</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7701518x10.png"/></fig>Theoretical Analysis by Using First Order Rate Equation<p>In mostly cases of recovery precious metals, the cementation electrochemical reactions follow first-order reaction kinetics and generally are limited by diffusion of the noble metal ion through the mass-transfer boundary layer. In some cases the structure and morphology of the reaction product can have a significant effect on passivating the surface in other cases.</p><p>Most of the cementation reactions are found to be first-order diffusion processes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54022-ref17">17</xref>] with respect to the noble metal ion, and the reaction velocity constant, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7701518x11.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>, for such a reaction may be computed from the general first- order rate Equation (4):</p><disp-formula id="scirp.54022-formula1132"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7701518x12.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>If <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7701518x13.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is not concentration dependent and the area is unhanging Equation (5) may be integrated resulting in the integrated first-order expression,</p><disp-formula id="scirp.54022-formula1133"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7701518x14.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7701518x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the reaction velocity constant (cm/sec); <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7701518x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is reaction surface area (cm<sup>2</sup>); and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7701518x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the solution volume rate (cm<sup>3</sup>). In Equation (4), it can be seen that the cementation rate is a function of the reaction area<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7701518x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. It has been shown by many investigators that in almost all cementation systems the initial exposed geometric area of the precipitant metal can be used in the analysis of initial rate data.</p><p>However, in a more general sense, the area term is not always that simple to evaluate due to the changing nature of the noble metal deposit which grows on the active metal during the course of the reaction.</p><p>Experimental investigations [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54022-ref17">17</xref>] indicate that most cementation reactions are controlled by a mass transfer process, film diffusion, as indicated by the results presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>Accord with the <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>, we are going to use the first order rate expression Equation 5 to analysis the electrocoagulation results.</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Chemical Precipitation for Cyanides Copper, Zinc and Iron Ions</title><p>After the precipitation is the creation of a solid in a solution or inside another solid during a chemical reaction or by diffusion in a solid. When the reaction occurs in a liquid solution, the solid formed is called the “precipitate”. The chemical that causes the solid to form is called the “precipitant”. Without sufficient force of gravity (settling) to bring the solid particles together, the precipitate remains in suspension.</p><p>Chemical precipitation is effective and by far the most widely used in industrial process, because it is relatively simple and inexpensive to operate. In precipitation process, chemical react with heavy metal ions to form insoluble precipitants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54022-ref18">18</xref>] .</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Data for selected cementation aqueous systems at 25˚C [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54022-ref17">17</xref>] </title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >System</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >∆E<sub>o</sub>, V</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Activation energy, Kcal/mole</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Reaction velocity constant, cm/sec</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ag<sup>+</sup>/Cu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0 - 5.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.5 - 6.0 &#215; 10<sup>−2 </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ag<sup>+</sup>/Cu (CN<sup>−</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.7 - 5.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.5 &#215; 10<sup>−2</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ag<sup>+</sup>/Fe (Cl<sup>−</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2 &#215; 10<sup>−2 </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ag<sup>+</sup>/Zn (CN<sup>−</sup>)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.5 &#215; 10<sup>−2</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ag<sup>+</sup>/Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0 - 6.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.6 - 2.1 &#215; 10<sup>−2</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu<sup>2+</sup>/Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.6 - 2.1 &#215; 10<sup>−2</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pb<sup>2+</sup>/Fe</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pb<sup>2+</sup>/Zn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.64 &#215; 10<sup>−2 </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pb<sup>2+</sup>/Cu</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.5 - 7.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36 - 2.3 &#215; 10<sup>−2</sup></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>Sulphide Solubility Curves<p>The thermodynamic equilibrium involved in metal sulphide precipitation has been proposed as [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54022-ref19">19</xref>] :</p><disp-formula id="scirp.54022-formula1134"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7701518x19.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.54022-formula1135"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7701518x20.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.54022-formula1136"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7701518x21.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.54022-formula1137"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7701518x22.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The concentration of sulphur species is a strong function of pH, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>.</p><p>Accord with <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref>, the arguments for its preferential use of sulphide precipitation are based on the high degree of metal removal at relatively low pH values; the sparingly soluble nature of sulphide precipitates; favorable dewatering characteristics and stability of the metal sulphides formed. However when choosing a metal sulphide precipitation route, various complexities are encountered. The first issue is the nature of the particles formed in metal sulphide precipitation. Because of the extremely low solubilities of most metal sulphide salts, the supersaturation created by the interaction of the aqueous sulphide and metal species can be very high (up to 10<sup>35</sup> and higher). Thus, the dominant precipitation mechanisms are homogeneous nucleation and limited crystal growth. Attrition of the sulphide crystals due to turbulence, combined with possible aggregation of the solid particles. These can cause problems in downstream processing and should be avoided. The second issue is the formation of aqueous polysulphide complexes under conditions of excess sulphide which can be experienced either globally or locally [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.54022-ref20">20</xref>] .</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> shows the constants sulphides solubility of some compounds.</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Sulphide solubility curves</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7701518x23.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Constants sulphides solubility</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Compound</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >K<sub>sp</sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Concentration of ions (g Ion/l) in saturated solution</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CuS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 &#215; 10<sup>−</sup><sup>37 </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.2 &#215; 10<sup>−23</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ag<sub>2</sub>S</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8 &#215; 10<sup>−51 </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.44 &#215; 10<sup>−17</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >PbS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 &#215; 10<sup>−28 </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.84 &#215; 10<sup>−14</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CdS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 &#215; 10<sup>−27 </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6 &#215; 10<sup>−15 </sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NiS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4 &#215; 10<sup>−20 </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.18 &#215; 10<sup>−12</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ZnS</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2 &#215; 10<sup>−23 </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.46 &#215; 10<sup>−12</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cd(OH)<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.2 &#215; 10<sup>−15 </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ni(OH)<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8 &#215; 10<sup>−16 </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cu(OH)<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.8 &#215; 10<sup>.20 </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.2 &#215; 10<sup>−20</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ag(OH)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1 &#215; 10<sup>−25 </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Zn(OH)<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3 &#215; 10<sup>−17 </sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8 &#215; 10<sup>14</sup></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pb(OH)<sub>2</sub></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.43 &#215; 10<sup>−20</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Experimental Procedure</title><p>The electrocoagulation experiments were performed in 1000 ml beaker size reactor equipped with two carbon steel electrodes (10 cm &#215; 14 cm) that were 5 mm apart. As source of current and voltage a universal AC/DC adaptor was used. The pH was measured with a VWR scientific 8005 pH meter (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref>). The pregnant cyanide solutions were provided by the Bacis mining group.</p><p>The pregnant solution had a pH 12 and was adjusted by adding solution of sulfuric acid. The conductivity was adjusted using NaCl. EC was run at 10 Volts (DC) and the corresponding current was of 20 &#197;. EC was run on the samples, solutions and solids from the process were then separated by filtration through cellulose filter paper. The sludge from the EC was dried either in an oven or under vacuum at room temperature.</p><p>The parameters of the EC process for recovery of metal precious, experiments were conducted with by the same voltage and amperage, changing pH of the solution, and residence time in the EC cell, the solution initial concentration and the operational parameters are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref>.</p><p>To identify and characterize the species in the solid products, formed during the precipitation and EC process, were used Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM/EDX). Analysis of Au, Ag, Cu, Zn and Fe were conducted to the Bacis solution, by AES.</p>Precipitation<p>The precipitation experiments were performed in 1000 ml glass. In all the tests the initial solution was from the same batch (show <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref>). The following conditions were fixed: room temperature 25˚C; different pH using H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and different amounts of Na<sub>2</sub>S. The pregnant cyanide solutions were provided by the Bacis mining group.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Results and Discussion</title><p>Running the EC process for gold and silver removal on iron electrodes, the results are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref>. These results show the equilibrium concentration profile of gold and silver removal efficiency and final pHs values vs. time.</p><p>The obtained results show that EC is an excellent option to recovery Au and Ag from pregnant cyanide solution by using iron electrodes. Also, under these conditions, the results show that, when residence time increases from 10 to 20 minutes the silver and gold removal increase to 92% and 95% respectively, this variation occurs at pH values from 9 to 10, approximately; these values coincide with the production of magnetic iron, Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> (green rust). Also, it is apparent that the uptake percent’s of gold/silver increased by increasing the pH value.</p><sec id="s5_1"><title>5.1. Theoretical Analysis of the Electrocoagulation Process</title><p>The average gold and silver content in pregnant solution was of 4.27 and 283 ppm, recovery was obtained of 92%</p><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Laboratory equipment for electrocoagulation</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7701518x24.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table4" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> Initial solution values of electrocoagulation</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Initial solution</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Au (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ag (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cu (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Zn (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fe (ppm)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pregnant solution</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >283</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5899</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8766</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3997</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table5" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table5">Table 5</xref></label><caption><title> Initial operating conditions of electrocoagulation</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Time (min)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Voltage (Volt)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Current (Amp)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Volume (ml)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >NaCl (gr)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >pH</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7, 9, 10, 12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1000</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7, 9, 10, 12</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table6" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref></label><caption><title> Initial solution values of precipitation process</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Initial solution</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pb (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cu (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Zn (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fe (ppm)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Barren solution</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6569</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8770</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4277</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table7" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref></label><caption><title> Electrocoagulation process</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Au (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ag (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pb (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cu (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Zn (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fe (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Time (min)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >pH</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >283</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5899</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8766</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4997</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >133</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4434</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6628</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4306</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >110</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4058</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5398</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4189</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >101</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4312</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5191</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3781</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3742</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4854</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3108</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3276</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4292</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3170</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >42.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2841</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3611</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2827</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1361</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2283</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1718</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1543</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1099</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table8" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table8">Table 8</xref></label><caption><title> % Recovery of electrocoagulation process</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Au (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Ag (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pb (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cu (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Zn (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fe (%)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Time (min)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >pH</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >60.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >61.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >38.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >26.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >72.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >23.49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.62</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >37.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >77.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >31.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >44.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >36.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >85.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >51.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >58.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >43.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >84.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >41.96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >76.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >65.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.74</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >64.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>of gold and 95% of silver, with this optimum operating parameters, pH 10, residence time 20 minutes and conductivity by addition of sodium chloride 4 gr/L. Based on the results presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table6">Table 6</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table7">Table 7</xref>, the rate of electrocoagulation process for adsorption of gold and silver in magnetic particles the reaction is expected to be a function of the surface area and the concentration of the reacting noble metal ion (gold or silver in the present case), therefore were used the first-order equation, see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref>.</p><p>It was demonstrated that the recovery of gold and silver follows the first order rate equation according to the obtained values of R<sup>2</sup> and correlation factor, see <xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref>, obtained from the kinetic constant slope.</p><p>The equilibrium concentration profiles (on logarithmic scale), the results were found to conform to the first- order rate process for over 90% removal as shown in figure (Au/Fe(CN)-system) and (Ag/Fe(CN)-system). From these data it is evident that the cementation of both gold and silver by zinc conforms to well-behaved fist order kinetics. Also, from these figure, the micrograph of reacted iron particles can be seen.</p><p>This micrograph reveals the nature of the silver and gold deposits. The effect of the gold and silver deposits on the rate of electrocoagulation reaction product showed that the gold and silver formed uniforms, apparently porous layer around the iron particle.</p></sec><sec id="s5_2"><title>5.2. Precipitation</title><p>The precipitation process for gold, silver, lead, cooper, zinc and iron removal, gave the results shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0 and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>1 (% Recovery) shows the equilibrium concentration profile of gold and silver removal efficiency and final pHs values vs. time.</p><p>The results showed the nature, surface, and settling characteristics of the gold, silver, zinc, lead, iron, cooper sulfide precipitates were found to be strongly influenced by sulfide availability and speciation and operating pH.</p></sec><sec id="s5_3"><title>5.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM/EDAX)</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> shows SEM and EDX of silver adsorbed on iron species. SEM microphotography shows that the surfaces of these iron oxide/oxyhydroxide particles were coated with a layer of silver. The chemical composition of solid product as determined by EDX, with this analytical technique used for the elemental analysis or chemical characterization, identify the iron, silver and other elements like calcium and copper, the maximum number of counts from spectrum corresponds to iron and less counts at the other elements include the silver, then we can concluded what the silver is adsorbed on the particle of iron like shows SEM image. Show <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref>. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>2 shows chemical composition the solid product of electrocoagulation process determined by EDX.</p><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Graphical rate equation of the first order</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7701518x25.png"/></fig><table-wrap id="table9" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table9">Table 9</xref></label><caption><title> Correlation factor and kinetic constant values</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >R<sup>2 </sup></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >K</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Au</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9964</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0328</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Ag</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9864</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0272</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref> shows SEM and EDX of lead, cooper, zinc and iron. SEM microphotography shows the surface of particles. The chemical composition of solid product as determined by EDX, with this analytical technique used for the elemental analysis or chemical characterization, identify the lead, cooper, zinc and iron and other elements like calcium, chlorine, manganese and silicon. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>3 shows chemical composition the solid product of precipitation process determined by EDX.</p><table-wrap id="table10" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>0</label><caption><title> Results of precipitation process</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sub>2</sub>S (gr/L)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> (N)<sub> </sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pb (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cu (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Zn (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fe (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Time (min)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >pH</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6569</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8770</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4277</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1843</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1602</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1452</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2104</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1770</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1610</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.37</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1113</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1569</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1050</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1093</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1419</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >699</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.014</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >680</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >352</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >403</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >405</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >167</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >267</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.018</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >168</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >49</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >50</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table11" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>1</label><caption><title> % Recovery of precipitation process</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Sample number</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Na<sub>2</sub>S (gr/L)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub><sub> </sub>(N)<sub> </sub></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Pb (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Cu (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Zn (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Fe (ppm)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Time (min)</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >pH</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.006</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >67.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >79.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >62.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.008</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >71.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >66.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >63.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >82.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >75.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.012</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >68.80</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >83.65</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.014</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >73.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89.64</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >95.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.016</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >86.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.018</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.20</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.10</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >99.76</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig-group id="fig5"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> SEM and EDAX images for by products generated from EC of pregnant solution.</title></caption><fig id ="fig5_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7701518x26.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig5_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7701518x27.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig-group id="fig6"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> SEM and EDAX images for by products generated from precipitation process.</title></caption><fig id ="fig6_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7701518x28.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig6_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7701518x29.png"/></fig></fig-group><table-wrap id="table12" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>2</label><caption><title> EDAX, elemental analysis or chemical characterization</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Element</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Weight %</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Atomic %</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.63</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >27.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >57.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SiK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.38</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.19</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CuK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.40</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.59</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ZnK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SeL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >AgL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >45.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.06</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table13" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>3</label><caption><title> EDAX, elemental analysis or chemical characterization</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Element</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Weight %</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Atomic %</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >18.43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.94</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >OK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >39.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >48.97</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >NaK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.42</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SiK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.61</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >SK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ClK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CaL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.47</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >MnL</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.55</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.56</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >FeK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >CuK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.71</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >ZnK</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.64</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Conclusions</title><p>The obtained results show that EC process is an excellent option for the recovery of Au and Ag from pregnant cyanide solution by using iron electrodes. The experimental reaction velocity constants correspond to the expected magnitude of the limiting mass-transfer coefficients and support the hypothesis that the electrocoagulation reactions under these conditions are mass-transfer limited reactions with recoveries of gold and silver of 92% and 95% respectively.</p><p>The results of precipitation process show that the elimination of lead, zinc, cooper and iron ions from barren solution was successful, with optimum operating parameters in the range of pH 4 to 3 and residence time of 15 minutes, and the recoveries were 99% of these ions.</p><p>Scanning Electronic Microscopy demonstrates that the formed species are of magnetic type, like lepidocrocite, magnetite and amorphous iron oxyhydroxide which adsorbed the silver and gold particles on the surface due to the electrostatic attraction between both metals.</p></sec><sec id="s7"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors gratefully acknowledge to the National Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT) and Department of Chemical Engineering and Metallurgical of University of Sonora.</p></sec><sec id="s8"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.54022-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Habashi</surname><given-names> F. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1967</year>)<article-title>Kinetics and Mechanism of Gold and Silver Dissolution in Cyanide Solution</article-title><source> Montana Bureau of Mines Geological Bulletin</source><volume> 59</volume>,<fpage> 1</fpage>-<lpage>42</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54022-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dai, X. and Jeffrey, M.I. (2006) The Effect of Sulphide Minerals on the Leaching of Gold in Aerated Cyanide Solutions. Hydrometallurgy, 82, 118-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2006.03.005</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54022-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Fink, C.G. and Putnam, G.L. (1950) The Action of Sulphide Ion and for Metal Salts on the Dissolution of Gold in Cyanide Solutions. Transactions AIME, 187, 952-955.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54022-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hedley, N. and Tabachnick, H. (1968) Chemistry of Cyanidation. Mineral Dressing Notes No. 23, American Cyanamid Company, New Jersey.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54022-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Brooy, S.R. and Linge, H.G. (1996) Review of Gold Extraction from Ores. Mineral Engineering, 7, 1213-1241.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0892-6875(94)90114-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54022-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Habashi, F. (2005) A Short History of Hydrometallurgy. Hydrometallurgy, 79, 15-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0892-6875(94)90114-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54022-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Parga, J.R., Gonzalez, G., Moreno, H. and Valenzuela, J.L. (2012) Thermodynamic Studies or the Strontium Adsoption on Iron Species Generated by Electrocoagulation. Desalination and Water Treatment, 37, 244-252.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0892-6875(94)90114-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54022-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Martinez, G.V.F., Torres, J.R.P., Garcia, J.L.V., Munive, G.C.T. and Zamarripa, G.G. (2012) Kinetic Aspects of Gold and Silver Recovery in Cementation with Zinc Power and Electrocoagulation Iron Process. Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science, 2, 342-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/aces.2012.23040</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54022-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rehman, I. and Bonfield, W. (1997) Characterization of Hydroxyapatite and Carbonated Apatite by Photo Acoustic FTIR Spectroscopy. Journal of Materials Science Materials in Medicine, 8, 1-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1018570213546</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54022-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rayanaud, S., Champion, E., Bernache-Assollant, D. and Thomas, P. (2002) Characterization and Thermal Stability of Powders. Biomaterials, 23, 1065-1072.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54022-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bagotsky, V.S. (2006) Fundamentals of Electrochemistry. 2nd Edition, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc., New Jersey, 44.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54022-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lapidus, G. (1995) Unsteady-State Model for Gold Cyanidation on a Rotating Disk. Hydrometallurgy, 39, 251-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-386X(95)00033-D</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54022-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Jin, S., May, O., Ghali, E. and Deschenes, G. (1998) Investigation on the Mechanisms of the Catalytical Effect of Lead Salts on Gold Dissolution in Cyanide Solution. In: Yang, X.W., Chen, Q.Y. and He, A.P., Eds., Proceedings of Third International Conference on Hydrometallurgy, ICHM’98, International Academic Publishers, Beijing, 666-679.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54022-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mollah, M., Morkovsky, P., Gomez, J., Kesmez, M., Parga, J.R. and Cocke, D. (2004) Fundamentals, Present and Future Perspectives of Electrocoagulation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 114, 199-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.08.009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54022-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Emamjomeh, M.M. and Sivakumar, M. (2009) Review of Pollutants Removed by Electrocoagulation and Electrocoagulation/Flotation Processes. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 1663-1679. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.011</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54022-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Zhao, X., Zhang, B.F., Liu, H.J. and Qu, J.H. (2010) Removal of Arsenite by Simultaneous Electro-Oxidation and Electro-Coagulation Process. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 184, 472-476.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54022-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Senanayake, G. (2006) The Cyanidation of Silver Metal: Review of Kinetics and Reaction Mechanism. Hydrometallurgy, 81, 75-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2005.12.001</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54022-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ku, Y. and Jung, I.L. (2001) Photocatalytic Reduction of Cr(VI) in Aqueous Solutions by UV Irradiation with the Presence of Titanium Dioxide. Water Research, 35, 135-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00098-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54022-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Lewis</surname><given-names> A.E. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2010</year>)<article-title>Review of Metal Sulphide Precipitation</article-title><source> Hydrometallurgy</source><volume> 104</volume>,<fpage> 222</fpage>-<lpage>234</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.54022-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Lewis, A. and van Hille, R. (2006) An Exploration into Sulphide Precipitation Method and Its Effect on Metal Sulphide Removal. Hydrometallurgy, 81, 197-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2005.12.009</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>