<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">AM</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Applied Mathematics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-7385</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/am.2015.62027</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">AM-53836</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  Thermal Radiation Effects on MHD Boundary Layer Flow over an Exponentially Stretching Surface
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>antosh</surname><given-names>Chaudhary</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Sawai</surname><given-names>Singh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Susheela</surname><given-names>Chaudhary</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Mathematics, Malaviya National Institute of Technology, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Department of Mathematics, S. K. Govt. (P.G.) College, Sikar, Rajasthan, India</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>d11.santosh@yahoo.com(AC)</email>;<email>dhayal.sawaisingh@yahoo.com(SS)</email>;<email>susheelamaths@gmail.com(SC)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>03</day><month>02</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>295</fpage><lpage>303</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>11</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>29</month>	<year>January</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>5</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The steady two-dimensional laminar boundary layer flow and heat transfer of a viscous incompressible electrically conducting fluid over an exponentially stretching surface in the presence of a uniform magnetic field with thermal radiation are investigated. The governing boundary layer equations are transformed to ordinary differential equations by taking suitable similarity transformation and solved numerically by shooting method. The effects of various parameters such as magnetic parameter, radiation parameter, Prandtl number and Eckert number on local skin-friction coefficient, local Nusselt number, velocity and temperature distributions are computed and represented graphically.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Thermal Radiation</kwd><kwd> MHD</kwd><kwd> Boundary Layer Flow</kwd><kwd> Exponentially Stretching Surface</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The study of boundary layer flow and its applications are vital for advancement in the field of technology and engineering. The computation and computer coordinated applications of flow over a stretching surface are playing a pivotal role in different realm of industrial products of aerodynamics, polymers and metallurgy, such as liquid films in condensation process, artificial fibers, glass fiber, metal spinning, the cooling process of metallic plate in a cooling bath and glass, wire drawing, paper production, aerodynamic extrusion of plastic sheets, crystal growing, cable coating and many others, to get end product of desired quality and parameters. Sakiadis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53836-ref1">1</xref>] probably was the first who investigated boundary layer flow on a moving continuous solid surface. Crane [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53836-ref2">2</xref>] extended this concept to a linearly stretching plate whose velocity is linearly proportional to the distance from the slit and produced an exact analytical solution for the steady two-dimensional flow problems. Gupta and Gupta [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53836-ref3">3</xref>] , Carragher and Crane [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53836-ref4">4</xref>] , Grubka and Bobba [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53836-ref5">5</xref>] , Chen and Char [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53836-ref6">6</xref>] , Ali [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53836-ref7">7</xref>] , Andersson [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53836-ref8">8</xref>] , Ariel et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53836-ref9">9</xref>] , Ishak et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53836-ref10">10</xref>] , Jat and Chaudhary [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53836-ref11">11</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53836-ref12">12</xref>] , Wang [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53836-ref13">13</xref>] and Nadeem et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53836-ref14">14</xref>] analyzed the effects of heat transfer on a stretching surface taking into account different aspects of the problem.</p><p>Boundary layer flow and heat transfer over an exponentially stretching surface have wider applications in technology such as in case of annealing and thinning of copper wires. Magyari and Keller [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53836-ref15">15</xref>] obtained analytical and numerical solutions for boundary layer flow over an exponentially stretching continuous surface with an exponential temperature distribution. Many other problems on exponentially stretching surface under different physical situations were observed by Elbashbeshy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53836-ref16">16</xref>] , Partha et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53836-ref17">17</xref>] , Khan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53836-ref18">18</xref>] , Sanjayanand and Khan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53836-ref19">19</xref>] and El-Aziz [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53836-ref20">20</xref>] .</p><p>At higher operating temperature, the effects of thermal radiation and heat transfer play a pivotal role on the fluid flow problem of boundary layer. The application of controlled heat transfer in polymer industries is very important to get final product of desired parameters. The modern system of electric power generation, plasma, space vehicles, astrophysical flows and cooling of nuclear reactors are governed by applications of thermal radiation and heat transfer of fluid flow. Elbashbeshy [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53836-ref21">21</xref>] determined the effect of radiation on flow of an incompressible fluid along a heated horizontal stretching sheet. Sajid and Hayat [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53836-ref22">22</xref>] extended this concept by investigating the influence of thermal radiation on the boundary layer flow over an exponentially stretching sheet and solved the problem analytically. Recently, Bidin and Nazar [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53836-ref23">23</xref>] , Jat and Chaudhary [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53836-ref24">24</xref>] , Nadeem et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53836-ref25">25</xref>] and Mukhopadhyay and Gorla [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53836-ref26">26</xref>] investigated various aspects of such problem either analytically or numerically.</p><p>With reference to above significant studies and in view of importance of MHD applications in various field of technologies, the objective of present paper is to investigate the effect of thermal radiation on an electrically conducting two-dimensional boundary layer incompressible viscous fluid flow over an exponentially stretching surface in the presence of uniform magnetic field by using Rosseland approximation. Numerical results of the momentum and energy equations are computed by using shooting method. The promising results of velocity and temperature distributions, local skin-friction coefficient and surface heat transfer are discussed for various physical parameters and simplified their effects for different conditions.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Problem Formulation</title><p>Consider the steady two-dimensional laminar boundary layer flow <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x5.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> of a viscous incompressible electrically conducting radiative fluid over continuous exponentially stretching surface in the presence of an externally applied normal magnetic field of constant strength<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x6.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The x-axis is taken along the stretching surface in the direction of motion and y-axis is taken perpendicular to it. The stretching surface has a uniform temperature <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x7.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and a linear velocity <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x8.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> while temperature of flow external to the boundary layer is<inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x9.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>. The system of governing boundary layer equations (which model <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) are given by:</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Sketch of the physical problem</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x10.png"/></fig><disp-formula id="scirp.53836-formula578"><label>(1)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x11.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.53836-formula579"><label>(2)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x12.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.53836-formula580"><label>(3)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x13.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where T<sub>0</sub> is the reference temperature, L is the reference length, U<sub>0</sub> is the reference velocity, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x14.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the coef-</p><p>ficient of kinematic viscosity, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x15.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the coefficient of viscosity, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x16.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the fluid density, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x17.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the electrical conductivity, C<sub>p</sub> is the specific heat at constant pressure, T is the temperature, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x18.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the thermal conductivity and q<sub>r</sub> is the radiative heat flux. The other symbols have their usual meanings.</p><p>The boundary conditions are:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53836-formula581"><label>(4)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x19.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>By using Rosseland approximation of the radiation for an optically thick boundary layer, the radiative heat flux q<sub>r</sub> is expressed (Bidin and Nazar [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53836-ref23">23</xref>] ) as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53836-formula582"><label>(5)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x20.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the mean absorption coefficient. The above radiative heat flux q<sub>r</sub> is effective at a point away from boundary layer surface in an intensive absorption flow. Considering that the temperature variation within the flow is very small, the T<sup>4</sup> may be expressed as a linear function of temperature T. Expanding T<sup>4</sup> by Taylor’s series about temperature <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x21.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x22.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x23.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and neglecting higher-order terms, hence</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53836-formula583"><label>(6)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x24.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using Equation (5) and (6), equation (3) is reduced to:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53836-formula584"><label>(7)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x25.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Similarity Analysis</title><p>The continuity Equation (1) is identically satisfied if we defined stream function <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x26.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53836-formula585"><label>(8)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x27.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>For the solution of momentum and energy Equations (2) and (7), introducing the following dimensionless variables:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53836-formula586"><label>(9)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x28.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.53836-formula587"><label>(10)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x29.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.53836-formula588"><label>(11)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x30.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Using Equations (8) to (11), Equations (2) and (7) are reduced to:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53836-formula589"><label>(12)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x31.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.53836-formula590"><label>(13)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x32.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The boundary conditions are:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53836-formula591"><label>(14)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x33.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where prime (') denote differentiation with respect to η, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the Magnetic parameter, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the Radiation parameter, <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula>is the Prandtl number and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x34.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x35.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x36.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x37.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the Eckert number.</p></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Numerical Solution of the Problem</title><p>For numerical solution of the Equations (12) and (13), we use the following power series in terms of small magnetic parameter M as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53836-formula592"><label>(15)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x38.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.53836-formula593"><label>(16)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x39.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>Substituting the values of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x40.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x41.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> from Equations (15) and (16) and its derivatives in Equations (12) and (13), and then equating the coefficients of like powers of M, we get the following set of equations:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53836-formula594"><label>(17)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x42.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.53836-formula595"><label>(18)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x43.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.53836-formula596"><label>(19)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x44.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.53836-formula597"><label>(20)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x45.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.53836-formula598"><label>(21)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x46.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><disp-formula id="scirp.53836-formula599"><label>(22)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x47.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The corresponding boundary conditions are:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53836-formula600"><label>(23)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x48.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>The Equation (17) is same as that obtained by Bidin and Nazar [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53836-ref23">23</xref>] for non-magnetic case and the remaining equations from (18) to (22) are ordinary linear differential equations and have been solved numerically by Shooting method with boundary condition (23). The velocity and temperature distributions for various values of parameters are shown in Figures 2-6 respectively.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Local Skin Friction Coefficient and Local Nusselt Number</title><p>The important physical quantities are the local skin-friction coefficient C<sub>f</sub> and the local Nusselt number Nu, which are defined as:</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Velocity distribution against η for various values of M</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x49.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> Temperature distribution against η for various values of M with K = 0.5, Pr = 1 and Ec = 0.0</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x50.png"/></fig><fig id="fig4"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig4">Figure 4</xref></label><caption><title> Temperature distribution against η for various values of K with M = 0.04, Pr = 1 and Ec = 0.0</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x51.png"/></fig><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig5">Figure 5</xref></label><caption><title> Temperature distribution against η for various values of Pr with M = 0.04, K = 0.5 and Ec = 0.0</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x52.png"/></fig><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig6">Figure 6</xref></label><caption><title> Temperature distribution against η for various values of Ec with M = 0.04, K = 0.5 and Pr = 1</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x53.png"/></fig><disp-formula id="scirp.53836-formula601"><label>(24)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x54.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53836-formula602"><label>(25)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x55.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>In the present case which can be expressed in dimensionless form as:</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53836-formula603"><label>(26)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x56.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>and</p><disp-formula id="scirp.53836-formula604"><label>(27)</label><graphic position="anchor" xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x57.png"  xlink:type="simple"/></disp-formula><p>where <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the surface shear stress and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x58.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x59.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> is the local Reynolds number. The numerical</p><p>values of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x60.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x61.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are proportional to the local skin-friction coefficient C<sub>f</sub> and local Nusselt number Nu at the surface respectively and these are presented by <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> for various values of the physical parameters.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>6. Results and Discussion</title><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> shows variation of velocity distribution <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> against <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x62.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x63.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for various values of the magnetic parameter M. This figure shows that the fluid velocity decreases with increasing value of the magnetic parameter M, due to the effect of Lorentz force produced by transverse magnetic field causes deceleration of fluid velocity.</p><p>Figures 3-6 show the temperature distributions <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> against <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> for various values of the magnetic parameter M, the radiation parameter K, the Prandtl number Pr and the Eckert number Ec. It is observed from these figures that the temperature distribution <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x64.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x65.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x66.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> increases with increasing value of any parameter, such as the magnetic parameter M, the radiation parameter K and the Eckert number Ec. However, it decreases with increasing value of the Prandtl number Pr. An increasing Prandtl number Pr, causes decrease in thermal boundary layer of fluid flow.</p><p>The values of the local skin-friction coefficient C<sub>f</sub> and the local Nusselt number Nu in terms of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> respectively, are presented in the <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>, for various values of the magnetic parameter M, the radiation parameter K and the Prandtl number Pr, with the Eckert number Ec = 0.0. It is significant that the local skin-friction coefficient C<sub>f</sub> and the local Nusselt number Nu decreases with increasing value of the magnetic parameter M. Moreover, the local Nusselt number Nu decreases with increasing value of the radiation parameter K, whereas the reverse phenomena occurs for the Prandtl number Pr. Further, <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref> shows that all values of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> are negative, corresponding to various values of physical parameters. A negative sign of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> implies the exertion of drag force on the surface and a negative sign of <inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x67.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x68.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x69.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x70.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x71.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula><inline-formula><inline-graphic xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/7-7402600x72.png" xlink:type="simple"/></inline-formula> implies heat transfer from the surface.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Variation of surface shear stress f'' (0) with M and surface heat transfer rate θ' (0) with M, K, Pr and Ec = 0.0</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="7"  >f'' (0)</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >M = 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >M = 0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >M = 0.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >−1.2821</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="3"  >−1.3135</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >−1.4642</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="7"  >θ' (0)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="2"  >K</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"   rowspan="2"  >Pr</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >Ec = 0.0</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >M = 0.00</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >M = 0.04</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >M = 0.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >0.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.9559</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >−0.9475</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.9080</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.4712</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >−1.4627</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.4217</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.8689</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >−1.8605</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.8202</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >0.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.6860</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >−0.6786</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.6455</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.0737</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >−1.0652</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.0246</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.3805</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >−1.3720</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.3309</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  rowspan="3"  >1.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.5528</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >−0.5466</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.5192</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.8653</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >−0.8571</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−0.8190</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.1215</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >−1.1129</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >−1.0721</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s7"><title>7. Conclusion</title><p>The characteristic relationships among various parameters influencing viscous incompressible electrically conducting fluid over an exponentially stretching surface in the presence of a uniform magnetic field with thermal radiation have been analyzed and illustrated graphically. The similarity equations are determined and solved numerically by shooting method. It is observed that thickness of the velocity boundary layer, the local skin-friction coefficient and the local Nusselt number decreases with increasing value of the magnetic parameter. However, thickness of the thermal boundary layer increases with increasing value of the magnetic parameter. Further, it is observed that thickness of thermal boundary layer increases with increasing value of the radiation parameter or the Eckert number, whereas, reverse phenomenon observed for the Prandtl number. Moreover, the local Nusselt number decreases with increasing value of the radiation parameter, while reverse behaviour observed for the Prandtl number.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.53836-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sakiadis, B.C. (1961) Boundary-Layer Behavior on Continuous Solid Surfaces: I. Boundary-Layer Equations for Two-Dimensional and Axisymmetric Flow. American Institute of Chemical Engineers Journal, 7, 26-28.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aic.690070108</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53836-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Crane, L.J. (1970) Flow past a Stretching Plate. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Physik, 21, 645-647.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01587695</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53836-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gupta, P.S. and Gupta, A.S. (1977) Heat and Mass Transfer on a Stretching Sheet with Suction or Blowing. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 55, 744-746. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450550619</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53836-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Carragher, P. and Crane, L.J. (1982) Heat Transfer on a Continuous Stretching Sheet. Zeitschrift für AngewandteMathematik und Mechanik, 62, 564-565. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/zamm.19820621009</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53836-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Grubka, L.J. and Bobba, K.M. (1985) Heat Transfer Characteristics of a Continuous, Stretching Surface with Variable Temperature. Journal of Heat Transfer, 107, 248-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.3247387</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53836-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Chen, C.K. and Char, M.I. (1988) Heat Transfer of a Continuous, Stretching Surface with Suction or Blowing. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 135, 568-580. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(88)90172-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53836-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ali</surname><given-names> M.E. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1994</year>)<article-title>Heat Transfer Characteristics of a Continuous Stretching Surface</article-title><source> Heat and Mass Transfer</source><volume> 29</volume>,<fpage> 227</fpage>-<lpage>234</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53836-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Andersson, H.I. (2002) Slip Flow past a Stretching Surface. Acta Mechanica, 158, 121-125.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01463174</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53836-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ariel, P.D., Hayat, T. and Asghar, S. (2006) The Flow of an Elastico-Viscous Fluid past a Stretching Sheet with Partial Slip. Acta Mechanica, 187, 29-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00707-006-0370-3</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53836-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ishak, A., Nazar, R. and Pop, I. (2006) Mixed Convection Boundary Layers in the Stagnation-Point Flow toward a Stretching Vertical Sheet. Meccanica, 41, 509-518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11012-006-0009-4</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53836-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jat, R.N. and Chaudhary, S. (2008) Magnetohydrodynamic Boundary Layer Flow Near the Stagnation Point of a Stretching Sheet. Il Nuovo Cimento della Società Italiana di Fisica B: General Physics, 123, 555-566.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53836-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jat, R.N. and Chaudhary, S. (2009) MHD Flow and Heat Transfer over a Stretching Sheet. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 3, 1285-1294.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53836-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wang, C.Y. (2009) Analysis of Viscous Flow Due to a Stretching Sheet with Surface Slip and Suction. Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, 10, 375-380. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2007.09.013</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53836-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nadeem, S., Hussain, A. and Khan, M. (2010) HAM Solutions for Boundary Layer Flow in the Region of the Stagnation Point towards a Stretching Sheet. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 15, 475-481.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.04.037</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53836-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Magyari, E. and Keller, B. (1999) Heat and Mass Transfer in the Boundary Layers on an Exponentially Stretching Continuous Surface. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 32, 577-585.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/32/5/012</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53836-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Elbashbeshy</surname><given-names> E.M.A. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2001</year>)<article-title>Heat Transfer over an Exponentially Stretching Continuous Surface with Suction</article-title><source> Archives of Mechanics</source><volume> 53</volume>,<fpage> 643</fpage>-<lpage>651</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53836-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Partha, M.K., Murthy, P.V.S.N. and Rajasekhar, G.P. (2005) Effect of Viscous Dissipation on the Mixed Convection Heat Transfer from an Exponentially Stretching Surface. Heat and Mass Transfer, 41, 360-366.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00231-004-0552-2</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53836-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Khan</surname><given-names> S.K. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2006</year>)<article-title>Boundary Layer Viscoelastic Fluid Flow over an Exponentially Stretching Sheet</article-title><source> International Journal of Applied Mechanics and Engineering</source><volume> 11</volume>,<fpage> 321</fpage>-<lpage>335</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53836-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sanjayanand, E. and Khan, S.K. (2006) On Heat and Mass Transfer in a Viscoelastic Boundary Layer Flow over an Exponentially Stretching Sheet. International Journal of Thermal Sciences, 45, 819-828.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2005.11.002</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53836-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">El-Aziz, M.A. (2009) Viscous Dissipation Effect on Mixed Convection Flow of a Micropolar Fluid over an Exponentially Stretching Sheet. Canadian Journal of Physics, 87, 359-368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/P09-047</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53836-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Elbashbeshy, E.M.A. (2000) Radiation Effect on Heat Transfer over a Stretching Surface. Canadian Journal of Physics, 78, 1107-1112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/p00-085</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53836-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sajid, M. and Hayat, T. (2008) Influence of Thermal Radiation on the Boundary Layer Flow Due to an Exponentially Stretching Sheet. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 35, 347-356.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2007.08.006</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53836-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Bidin, B. and Nazar, R. (2009) Numerical Solution of the Boundary Layer Flow over an Exponentially Stretching Sheet with Thermal Radiation. European Journal of Scientific Research, 33, 710-717.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53836-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Jat, R.N. and Chaudhary, S. (2010) Radiation Effects on the MHD Flow Near the Stagnation Point of a Stretching Sheet. Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik, 61, 1151-1154.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00033-010-0072-5</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53836-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Nadeem, S., Zaheer, S. and Fang, T. (2011) Effects of Thermal Radiation on the Boundary Layer Flow of a Jeffrey Fluid over an Exponentially Stretching Surface. Numerical Algorithms, 57, 187-205.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11075-010-9423-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53836-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mukhopadhyay, S. and Gorla, R.S.R. (2012) Effects of Partial Slip on Boundary Layer Flow past a Permeable Exponential Stretching Sheet in Presence of Thermal Radiation. Heat and Mass Transfer, 48, 1773-1781.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00231-012-1024-8</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>