<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JEP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Environmental Protection</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2152-2197</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jep.2015.62010</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JEP-53807</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Earth&amp;Environmental Sciences</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  A Contribution to the Epipelic Algal Ecology in Lotic Ecosystem of Iraq
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>ikrat</surname><given-names>M. Hassan</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Ali</surname><given-names>Obaid Shaawiat</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>College of Science for Women, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>College of Education, University of Al-Qadisiyah, Al Diwaniyah, Iraq</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>fikrat@csw.uobaghdad.edu.iq(IMH)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>05</day><month>02</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>06</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>85</fpage><lpage>95</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>18</day>	<month>January</month>	<year>2015</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd"><day>accepted</day>	<month>2</month>	<year>February</year>	</date><date date-type="accepted"><day>5</day>	<month>February</month>	<year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
  The study was conducted on epipleic diatoms in a lotic ecosystem. The Al-Shamiyah River was selected which is a distance from industrial activities. Four sites along the river were selected for sampling during the period from March 2013 to February 2014. A total of 173 species of epipelic diatoms were identified. The pennate diatoms predominated and represented about 92.49% of the total diatoms, while centric diatoms formed only 7.51%. The total number of diatoms ranged between 185.1 - 422.34 cell &#215; 10
  <sup>4</sup>/cm
  <sup>2</sup>. 
  Some of the pennate diatom species were Achnanthes affinis Grunow
  , Achnanthes mintussima K&#252;etzing, Cocconeis placentula var. euglypta (Ehr.) Cleve, Cymbella affinis K&#252;etzing, Diatoma vulgare Bory, Fragilaria capucina Desmazieres
  , Gomphonema angustatum var. productu Grun., Navicula lanceolata (Ag.) Kuetzing, Navicula radiosa K&#252;etzing, Navicula viridula K&#252;etzing, Nitzschia palea (Kutz.) W. Smith,
   
  Nitzschia romana
   Grunow. The physicochemical and epipelic algae species indicated that the water quality of the river was clean to moderate water quality.
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Diatom</kwd><kwd> Epipelic Algae</kwd><kwd> Lotic System</kwd><kwd> Euphrates River</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>The importance of benthic algae in Iraqi aquatic ecosystems was subjected to investigations recently [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref1">1</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref4">4</xref>] . Many authors have previously recognized benthic algae as bioindicators in different aquatic ecosystems of Iraq [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref5">5</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref7">7</xref>] .</p><p>Benthic algae play a role as energy source for many benthic fauna. Moreover, their roles in recycling nutrients (through the water column and sediment) and transformation of inorganic material into organic via photosynthesis in sediment were also known. Also, it was considered as oxygen sources for the water and sediment [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref7">7</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref9">9</xref>] . The benthic algae were considered as resistant to alterations of the environment and pollution due to their ability to attach to benthic substrates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref10">10</xref>] .</p><p>The abundance of diatomic algae was also observed in different studies. The abundance of some diatomic species may reflect the status of the aquatic ecosystem such as the trophic status [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref11">11</xref>] or extent of organic pollution [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref5">5</xref>] and to water quality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref3">3</xref>] . Many authors have pointed out the abundance of diatoms and explained that the diatomic algae had the ability to alter the conditions of their environment, but their community structure responded to altered physicochemical and biological variables in the ecosystem [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref12">12</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref14">14</xref>] .</p><p>Al-Lami et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref15">15</xref>] observed high diversity of epipelic algae in four aquatic systems having a gradient of salinity in central of Iraq. Essa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref16">16</xref>] used diatoms as bioindicators in some aquatic systems in Basra region, Iraq, where the author stated that the status of these sites ranged between oligo-mesotrophic and mesotrophic except only one site which was trophic.</p><p>This investigation is the first attempt to fill the gap of information about epipelic algal ecology in Al-Sha- miyah River and the possibility to use epipelic algae as bioindicators.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Material and Methods</title><p>Four sites were selected along a branch of the Euphrates River, the Al-Shamiyah River (a Lotic System). The branch originates after passing Kifil city in the middle region of Iraq, and passes through the Shamiyah town which is just 284 km from Baghdad city (the capital of Iraq) and only 40 km from Al-Diwanyiah Province. The river converges with the Kufa River (a second branch of Euphrates River) at Shinafya town. The selected sites (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref>) were characterized by vast agricultural activity and the presence of macrophytes (sites 1, 2 and 3), while site 4 was located within a paddy field having dense growth of macrophytes.</p><p>All physicochemical parameters were measured according to the methods of APHA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref17">17</xref>] , Parsons et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref18">18</xref>] and Gaudette et al. [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref19">19</xref>] (for Total Organic Carbon (TOC%). Biological diversity indices (Species richness and Shannon-Weaver) were calculated according to Magurran [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref20">20</xref>] . Canonical Corresponded Analysis (CCA) Ver. 4.5 was applied for the statistical analysis.</p><fig id="fig1"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Figure 1</xref></label><caption><title> Map of the studied area</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6702533x6.png"/></fig><p>Epipelic algae samples were taken according to Eaton and Moss [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref21">21</xref>] . Microtransect method was used for estimation of the total number of epipelic algae after preparing permanent slides [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref21">21</xref>] . Identification of epipelic algae relied on description given in the following references: [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref22">22</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref26">26</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Results</title><p>The physicochemical parameters of the Al-Shamiyah River were already discussed in terms of seasonal and spatial variation [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref27">27</xref>] . In winter (December and February 2014) and summer 2013 (August 2013), respectively, air and water minimum temperature (AT and WT) were not less than 11˚C, while maximum did not exceed 39˚C (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). Water flow rates ranged between 20 meter/min<sup>−1</sup> at site 3 in April 2013 and 49.99 meter/min<sup>−1</sup> at site 1 in January 2014. Records of turbidity (Tur) were Low in April 2013 (8.25 NTU) while higher value (22.11 NTU) was recorded in January 2014 at sites 3 and 1, respectively. Electric conductivity (EC) and salinity (S‰) ranged 1108 - 1560 &#181;/cm and 0.71‰ - 0.99‰, respectively. Total suspended solids (TSS) value was higher at site 1 (39.02 mg/l) and low (16.50 mg/l) at site 3 in January 2014 and April 2013, respectively. Light penetration (LP) ranged between 24.40 and 65.00 cm at sites 1 and 3 in January 2014 and April 2013, respectively. All pH values were higher than 7.00 and reached 8.23 during most of the study period. Total alkalinity (TA) values ranged between 97 and 162 mg/l at sites 1 and 4 in September and June 2013, respectively.</p><p>No anoxia was recorded in this study and dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations ranged between 6.30 and 10.5 mg/l (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>). The lowest recorded concentration was in July 2013 while the highest was in February 2014. Maximum value of biochemical oxygen demands (BOD<sub>5</sub>) (2.50 mg/l) in August 2013 at site 4 and the lowest value was 0.99 mg/l at site 1. Total hardness (TH), calcium (Ca), and magnesium (Mg) concentrations ranged between 259.63 and 572.00 mg CaCO<sub>3</sub>/l, 74.41 and 150.55 mg/l, 12.57 and 63.10 mg/l during the study period, respectively for sites 1 to 4.</p><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Range of physicochemical parameters in Al-Shamiyah River during the study period</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameter</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Range</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Air temp. (˚C)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.33 - 39.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Water temp. (˚C)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.00 - 36.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Water flow (m/min)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.00 - 49.99</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Turbidity (NTU)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.25 - 22.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Light penetration (cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.40 - 65.00</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Electric C conductivity (μs/cm)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1108 - 1560</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Salinity ‰</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.71 - 0.99</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total dissolved solids (mg/l)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >709 - 998</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total suspended solids (mg/l)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.50 - 39.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >pH</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.46 - 8.23</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Dissolved oxygen mg/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.30 - 10.50</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Biochemical oxygen demand mg/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99 - 2.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Alkalinity mg CaCO<sub>3</sub>/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >97 - 162</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Hardness mg CaCO<sub>3</sub>/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >259.63 - 572</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Calcium mg/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >74.41 - 150.55</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Magnesium mg/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.57 - 63.10</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nitrite &#181;g/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.16 - 2.20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nitrate &#181;g/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.38 - 117.46</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Phosphate &#181;g/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.012 - 0.22</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Silicate &#181;g/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >93.13 - 160.8</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total organic carbon mg/l</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24 - 1.85</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Nutrient concentration records showed resemblance among river’s sites. Mean concentration of nitrite (NO<sub>3</sub>), nitrate (NO<sub>2</sub>), phosphate (PO<sub>4</sub>) and silicate (SiO<sub>3</sub>) ranged between 1.22 and 154, 57.00 and 73.00, 0.01 and 0.12, 120.25 and 140.73 &#181;g/l, respectively for sites 1 to 4.</p><p>A total of 173 taxa of epipelic algae were identified in this study. At site four 108 species were recorded while at sites 1 to 3: 89, 96 and 98 species were recorded, respectively. There were different numbers of genera and species recorded among the study sites (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref>). It is evident that pennate diatoms were dominant and represented 92.49% of the total identified diatoms. The pennate diatoms however represented: 91.01%, 91.67%, 91.84% and 92.59% at sites 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. The centric diatoms represented between 7.42% and 8.99% where the lowest percentage was at site 4 and the highest at site 1.</p><p>Some of the species recorded in this study were present in high numbers contrasting those of other epipelic algae. Four species recorded for each of the genera: Cyclottela, Achnanthes, and Cocconeis at site 1. While Cymbella, Gomphonema, Gyrosigma, Navicula and Nitzschia recorded 6, 5, 5, 10 and 20 at the same site, respectively. These genera also were recorded in other sites with different numbers of species. While the higher number of species, (26 species for Nitzschia) was recorded at site 4. While the genera Cymbell and Gomphonema were represented by ten species at sites 3 and 4. Number of Navicula species ranged between 10 and 16 at site 1 and 3, respectively.</p><p>Some species were present for the most period and sites of the study (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref>). At site 1, the following species were found: A. ambigua, C. ocellata, C. menenghiana, C. placentula var. euglypta,‏ C. affinis, G. angustatum var. productum, N. radiosa, N. viridula,‏ N. romana, S. ulna. While at site 2 species present were as follows: C. menenghiana, A. affinis, C. lacustris,‏ C. affinis,‏ D. vulgare, G. angustatum var. productum. However, at site 3 species present were A. ambigua, C. lacustris, C. placentula var. euglypta, N. viridula, N. romana, and N. palea, while at site 4 species present were A. ambigua, C. lacustris, C. menenghiana, C. ocellata, N. viridula, S. ulna and Gyrosigma acuminatum, G. angustatum var. productum.</p><p>Total number of epipelic algae ranged 185.154 &#215; 10<sup>4</sup>/cm - 422.345 &#215; 10<sup>4</sup>/cm at sites 2 and 4, respectively. Seasonal variation of the total number of epipelic algal species was observed in this study. For centric diatoms, Aulacoseira ambigua (0.51 - 2.31 cells &#215; 10<sup>4</sup>/cm<sup>2</sup> at sites 2 and 4), C. menenghiana (1.17 - 7.86 cells &#215; 10<sup>4</sup>/cm<sup>2</sup> at sites 1 and 3), C. ocellata (0.66 - 6.45 cells &#215; 10<sup>4</sup>/cm<sup>2</sup> at sites 2 and 4). Most of high total number for pennate diatoms was recorded at site 4. Total number of some pennate diatoms were as follows: 4.92 - 35.79 cells &#215; 10<sup>4</sup>/cm<sup>2</sup> for G. angustatum var. productum at sites 3 and 4, 1.3 - 20.94 cells &#215; 10<sup>4</sup>/cm<sup>2</sup> for N. palea at sites 2 and 3, 1.2 - 19.11 cells &#215; 10<sup>4</sup>/cm<sup>2</sup> for C. affinis at sites 1 and 4, 11.28 - 17.46 cells &#215; 10<sup>4</sup>/cm<sup>2</sup> for A. affinis at sites 3 and 2, respectively.</p><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Range (Mean &#177; SD) biological parameters in Al-Shamiyah River during the study period</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Parameters</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Site 1</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Site 2</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Site 3</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Site 4</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total diatoms algae cell &#215; 10<sup>4</sup>/cm<sup>2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.75 - 44.49 (20.78 &#177; 12.97)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.75 - 42.51 (15.42 &#177; 13.12)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.28 - 59.13 (26.96 &#177; 18.09)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.87 - 115.8 (35.19 &#177; 31.02)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Chlorophyll a μg/cm<sup>2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36 - 1.66 (1.08 &#177; 0.48)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07 - 1.45 (0.67 &#177; 0.54)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07 - 6.72 (1.72 &#177; 2.25)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.07 - 2.24 (0.7 &#177; 0.64)</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Pheophytin a μg/cm<sup>2</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.08 - 1.16 (0.36 &#177; 0.32)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.012 - 0.61 (0.19 &#177; 0.23)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.04 - 2.64 (0.63 &#177; 0.71)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03 - 0.98 (0.25 &#177; 0.27)</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Total number of genera and species of centrals (C) and pennales (P) of epipelic algae in the studied sites (S) during the study period in Al-Shamiyah River</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >S1</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >S2</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >S3</th><th align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >S4</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >C</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >P</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Genera</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Species</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >88</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >90</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >100</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Percent (%)</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.16</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >91.84</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >92.59</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total genera</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >25</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Total species</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >89</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >96</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >108</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap-group id="4"><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table4">Table 4</xref></label><caption><title> List of some dominant epipelic taxa and its total number (cell &#215; 10<sup>4</sup>/cm<sup>2</sup>) during the study period in Al-Shamiyah River</title></caption><table-wrap id="4_1"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Aulacoseira ambigua O. Muller</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.66</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.51</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1.95</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >2.31</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A. Dicikiei (Thwaites) Kutzing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A. distanse (Ehr.) Kutz</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A. granulate (Ehr.) Ralfs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.72</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cycllotella comta (Ehr.) Kuetzing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. glomerata Bachmann</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. kuetzingiana Thwaites</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. menenghiana Kuetzing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.98</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.86</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. ocellata Pantocsek</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.47</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. stelligera Cleve et Grunow Van Heurck</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Achnanthes affinis Grunow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.46</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.33</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A. hungarica Grunow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A. lanceolata Grunow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A. linearis W. Smith Grunow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A. microcephala (Ktz.) Grunow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.68</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.69</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A. mintussima K&#252;etzing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.79</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >A. saxonic Krasske</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cocconeis pediculus Ehrenberg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.62</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. placentula Ehrenberg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.4</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.38</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.95</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. placentula var. euglypta (Ehr.) Cleve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cymbella affinis K&#252;etzing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.13</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >19.11</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Cymbella aspera H. paragallo</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.33</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. caespitosa (Kutz.) Brun</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.45</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. cistula (Ehr.) Kirchn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. gracilis (Rabh.) Cleve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.99</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. helvetica Kuetzing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. lanceolata</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. obtusiuscula (Kutz.) Grun</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. parva (W. Smith) Kitchn</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. tumida (Br&#233;b.) V. Heurck</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.51</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.83</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.83</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. tumidula Grun</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >C. turgida (Greg.) Cleve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.52</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gomphonema acuminatum Ehr.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G. acuminatum var. turris Cleve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gomphonema angustatum (Ktz.) Rabenhorst</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.67</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G. angustatum var. product Grun</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.28</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.73</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G. augur Ehrenberg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >35.79</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G. constrictum Eher</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G. constrictum var. capitat (Ehr.) Cleve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="4_2"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >G. gracile Ehrenberg</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >-</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >1.05</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >6.96</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G. intricatum K&#252;etzing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.04</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G. intricatum var. lunata nov</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.82</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.95</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G. lanceolatum Ehrenberg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.17</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.5</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G. parvulum (Kuetz) Grun</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.57</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Gyrosigma acuminatum (Ktz.) Rabenhorst</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G. attenuatum (Ktz.) Rabenhorst</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.96</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G. scalproides (Raben) Cleve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G. macrum (W. Smith) Griff et. Henfr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G. spenceri (Quek) Griff et Henfr</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >G. tenuirostrum (Grun.) Cleve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Fragilaria brevistriata Grunow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F. capucina Desmazieres</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.02</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >15.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F. construens Grunow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.43</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F. construens var. subsalina Hust.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F. crotonensis Kitton</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.11</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >F. intermedia Grunow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.53</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Navicula angilica Ralfs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. angilica var. subsulsa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. bacillum Ehrenberg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. cincta (Ehr.) Kuetzing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.57</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.07</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.81</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.57</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. creptocephala Kuetzing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.75</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.26</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. decussis Oestrup</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. dicephala W. Smith</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.2</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. fusca Greg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. gibbula Cleve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. gracilis</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.01</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.34</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. graciloides A. Mayer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.44</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. gregaria Donkin</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. grimmei Krasske</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.78</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.35</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. halophila (Grun.) Cleve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.97</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.89</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. lanceolata (Ag.) Kuetzing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >13.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.14</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.97</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. mutica Kuetzing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. parva (Menegh) Cleve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. phyllepta Kuetzing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.43</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.87</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. radiosa K&#252;etzing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >22.41</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >17.58</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >40.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >14.67</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. rhynchocephala Kuetzing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. schroeteri Meister</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.56</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. spicula (Hickie) Cleve</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.45</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. viridula Ktz.</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.08</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >16.59</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.36</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Nitisha acicularis (Ktz.) W. Smith</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. acuta Hantzsch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. amphibia Grunow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="4_3"><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >N. apiculata (Greg.) Grunow</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >-</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. circumsuta</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. clausii Hantzsch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.25</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. commutata Grun</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.03</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. dissipata (Ktz.) Grunow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.73</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. dubia W. Smith</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. fasciculate Grunow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. filiforms (W. Smith) Hustedt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. fonticola Grunow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. gracilis Hantzsch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.92</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >9.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. hantzschiana Rabh</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. hungarica Grunow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.48</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.63</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. ignorata Krasske</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. inconspicua Grun</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >--</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.02</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. intermedia Hantzsch ex Cleve &amp; Grunow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.19</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.66</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. linearis W. Smith</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.85</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. lottoralis Grunow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. longissima Ralfs</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.27</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. microcephala Grun</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. obtusa W. Smith</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. palea (Kutz.) W. Smith</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >4.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.32</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >20.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.14</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. puctata (W. Smith) Grunow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. pusilla (Kutz.) Grunow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.77</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.39</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. recta Hantzsch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.27</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >6.57</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. romana Grunow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.35</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.23</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.66</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >24.51</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. rostellata Hustede</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.42</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. sigma W. Smith</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. sigmoidea (Ehr.) W. Smith</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.41</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. stagnorum Rabh</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. sublinearis Hustedt</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. tryblionella Hantsch</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >5.7</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.69</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. tryblionella var. debilis A. Mayer</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" ></td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. tryblionella var. levidensis Grunow</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.87</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >10.29</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >N. umbonate (Ehrenberg) Lange 0 Bertalot</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Synedra acus Kuetzing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.18</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.29</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S capitata Ehrenberg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.05</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S. pulchella (Ralfs) Kuetzing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S. rumpens Kg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >-</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.12</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S. tabulata var. fasciculate Agardh</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.09</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S. ulna (Nitz.) Ehrenberg</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.91</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >3.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.54</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >7.86</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >S. vaucheriae Kuetzing</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.36</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.6</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.9</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.06</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></table-wrap-group><p>Minimum value of Chlorophyll-a concentration ranged between 0.07 and 6.72 &#181;g/cm<sup>2</sup> at sites 2, 3 and 4 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>), while the maximum values were recorded at site 3 in late winter 2014 and autumn 2013, respectively. Phaeophytin-a concentration ranged between 0.012 and 2.64 &#181;g/cm<sup>2</sup> in late winter 2014 and spring 2013, respectively. For both chlorophyll-a and phaeophytin-a significant variation (P &lt; 0.05) among concentrations, sites and seasons were noticed.</p><p>Index of species richness ranged between 7.46 at site 4 in spring 2013 and 27.91 at site 3 in autumn 2013. While Shannon Species Diversity index showed high values (&gt;1) at all studied sites, and ranged between 1.35 - 3.23 at sites 2 for both valuesin summer and autumn 2013, respectively. For both estimations of biodiversitya significant difference (P &lt; 0.05) was recorded among sites and seasons. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref> illustrated the spatial and temporal variation of the studied biological diversity. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref> illustrated CCA analysis ofspecies-environment correlations.</p><fig id="fig2"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2">Figure 2</xref></label><caption><title> Spatial and temporal variations of the studied biological indices in Al- Shamaiyah</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6702533x7.png"/></fig><fig id="fig3"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig3">Figure 3</xref></label><caption><title> CCA analysis of species―environment correlations</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/1-6702533x8.png"/></fig></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Discussion</title><p>Both the air and water temperatures varied with season where lowest values were recorded in winter and the highest in summer. These findings were similar to observations made in previous studies in Iraqi aquatic ecosystems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref28">28</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref31">31</xref>] . These results may be explained in view of Iraq’s climate being continental and subtropical [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref32">32</xref>] . Water flow rate variation mostly affected mainly by operation of river regulation and channel morphology [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref33">33</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref34">34</xref>] . Also, light penetration influenced by means of physical and chemical properties of the river. These factors include turbidity, water drainage, the density of microorganism (including phytoplankton) and macrophytes cover [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref35">35</xref>] . EC, salinity, and TDS values recorded exceeded levels recorded in previous studies in Euphrates River [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref2">2</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref28">28</xref>] . According to APHA [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref17">17</xref>] and SWRCB [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref36">36</xref>] as mentioned by Manivanan [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref37">37</xref>] , the river is considered within freshwater, in which the conductivity range between 100 and 2000 &#181;S/cm, and brackish water in the range of 0.5‰ to 29‰. The Iraqi natural water ecosystems are known to be of buffer capacity of alkaline to hard water [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref38">38</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref39">39</xref>] . Well-oxygenated water in the river was noticed during the study period, and the highest values recorded in spring may be due to the increasing photosynthesis activity during this season and low temperature during the summer. BOD5 results reflected that Al-Shamiyah River was clean to moderately polluted river [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref40">40</xref>] . These results did not indicate a limitation role for nutrients in algae.</p><p>Spatial and temporal variations of epipelic algae in the studied river were obvious. The variation might be due to the different environmental characteristics among sites and seasons in addition to the texture of sediment. The dominance of diatoms in benthos ecosystems was well known. This dominance may be due to their ability to adapt in an altering environment with less available light intensity [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref41">41</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref43">43</xref>] . This dominance is also referred to in other studies of aquatic ecosystems in Iraq [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref1">1</xref>] -[<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref3">3</xref>] .</p><p>It is very known that in freshwater ecosystems the pinnate diatoms are predominate, while in marine ecosystems the centric diatoms are predominate [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref44">44</xref>] . Results of the present investigation confirmed the latter authors’ findings. The density of epipelic algae was related to many factors. These factors may be that some algae have the ability to reproduce in unsuitable conditions. In addition to that, their ability to secrete mucilage sheath that helps their daily rhythms [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref7">7</xref>] . Moreover, algal adhesion affected by nutrient concentrations, grazing process and other factors [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref2">2</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref45">45</xref>] . Temporal variation may be due to the climate characteristics of the study area that lies within the hot desert climate. Iraq is characterized by great temperature diurnal and seasonal variations. Most of the high number of total epipelic algae in spring and autumn during this study. These results also were noticed by other researchers in Iraqi aquatic ecosystems [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref1">1</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref2">2</xref>] . Chlorophyll-a concentration did not exceed 2.24 to 2 &#181;g/l, and may be attributed to the oligotrophic status of the river [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref46">46</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref47">47</xref>] . Nutrient concentrations and other physicochemical factors affect chlorophyll-a concentration and epipelic algae growth [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref48">48</xref>] . CCA analysis revealed positive correlation among some epipelic algae (C. lacustris, C. affinis, N. romana and S. ulna) and DO, Na, N:P, NO<sub>3</sub>, TSS, and Turbidity. While a negative correlation observed among these species and EC, BOD5, PO<sub>4</sub>, NO<sub>2</sub>, Ca, SO<sub>4</sub>, TOC and C:SiO<sub>3</sub>.</p><p>C. menenghiana, C. placentula var. euglypta, N. viridula, A. affinis, and A. veneta showed positive correlation with the following factors (EC, BOD5, TH, light pentertion (LP), CA, SO<sub>4</sub>, CO<sub>2</sub>, PO<sub>4</sub>, NO<sub>2</sub>, TOC and C:SiO<sub>3</sub>). While negative correlation with other factors (DO, Na, N:P, NO<sub>3</sub>, TSS and Turbidity).</p><p>The studied physicochemical parameters confirmed that the dominant species of epipelic algae in this investigation can be used as bioindicator for water quality. These factors reflected the clean to moderate water quality of the study sites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref44">44</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref49">49</xref>] [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53807-ref50">50</xref>] .</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>5. Conclusion</title><p>The diatom community in Al-Shamiyah River reflected the level of water quality in terms of dominant species. The studied physicochemical parameters in this investigation also confirmed the water quality status (clean to moderate) of the river.</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>NOTES</title></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.53807-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Khthim, N.F., Al-Amari, M.J.Y. and Hassan, F.M. (2013) The Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Epipelic Algae and Related Environmental Factors in Neel Stream, Babil Province, Iraq. IJAS, 4, 23-32.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salman, J.M., Kalifa, A.T. and Hassan, F.M. (2013) Qualitative and Quantitative Study of Epipelic Algae and Related Environmental Parameters in AL-HILLA RIVER, Iraq. IJCR, 5, 3318-3327.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hassan, F.M. and Al-Bdulameer, S.H. (2014) Qualitative and Quantitative Study of Epipelic Algae in Tigris River within Baghdad City, Iraq. Journal Baghdad for Science, 11, 1074-1082.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alkam, F.M. and Al-Nashi, N.H. (2013) Some Physico-Chemical Properties of EastEuphrates Drainage with Effected of EpipelicAlgae/AL-Dawaniya/Iraq. Journal of Alqadisiyah for Pure Science, 18, 1-18.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">AL-Saadi, H.A., Pankow, H. and Huq, M.F. (1979) Algological Investigation in the Polluted Ashar Canal and Shatt Al-Arab in Basrah, Iraq. Internationale Revue der gesamten Hydrobiologie, 64, 527-540.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Rimet, F. (2009) Benthic Diatom Assemblages and Their Correspondence with Ecological Classification: Case Study of Rivers in North-Eastern France. Hydrobiologia, 636, 137-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-009-9943-1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Poulickova, A., Hasler, P., Lysa Kova, M. and Spears, B. (2008) The Ecology of Fresh Water Epipelic Algae: An Update. Phycologia, 47, 437-450. http://dx.doi.org/10.2216/07-59.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sigee, D.C. (2005) Freshwater Microbiology: Biodiversity and Dynamic Interactions of Microorganisms in the Freshwater Environment. John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd., Chichester, 573.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Atici, T. and Caliskan, H. (2007) Effect of Some Environmental Variables on Benthic Shore Algae (Excluding Bacillariophyta) of Asartepe Dam (Ankara). International Journal of Natural and Engineering Sciences, 1, 9-22.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Stevenson, R J. (1996) The Stimulation and Drag of Current. In: Stevenson, R.J., Bothwell, M.L. and Lowe, R.L. Eds., Algal Ecology: Freshwater Benthic Ecosystems, Academic Press, San Diego, California, 321-340.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Sahin, B., Akar, B. and Bahceci, I. (2010) Species Composition and Diversity of Epipelic Algae in Balik Lake (Savsat-Artvin, Turkey). Turkish Journal of Botany, 34, 441-448.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moore, J.W. (1974) Benthic Algae of Southern Baffin Island: II. The Epipelic Communities in Temporary Ponds. Journal of Ecology, 62, 809-819. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2258956</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Round, F.E. (1984) The Ecology of Algae. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Mooser, K.A., Macdonald, G.M. and Smol, J.P. (1996) Applications of Freshwater Diatoms to Geographical Research. Progress in Physical Geography, 20, 21-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030913339602000102</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Al-Lami, A.A., Al-Saadi, H.A., Kassim, T.I. and Farhan, R.K. (1999) Seasonal Change Epipelic Algae Communities in North Part of Euphartes River, Iraq. Journal of College of Education for Women, 10, 236-247.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Amal</surname><given-names> M.E. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>2012</year>)<article-title>The Use of Diatom Indices for the Assessment of Shatt AL-Arab River Water Quality</article-title><source> Journal of Basrah Researches</source><volume> 38</volume>,<fpage> 114</fpage>-<lpage>124</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">APHA (American Public Health Association) (2003) Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastwater. 2nd Edition, Washington DC.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Parsons, T.R., Maita, Y. and Lalli, C.M. (1984) A Manual of Chemical and Biological Methods for Seawater Analysis. Pergamon Press, Oxford.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Gaudette, H.E., Flight, W.R., Toner, L. and Folger, D.W. (1974) An Inexpensive Titration Method for the Determination of Organic Carbon in Recent Sediments. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 44, 249-253.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Magurran, A.E. (1988) Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 264.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hadi, R.A.M., Al-Sabonchi, A.A. and Haroon, A.K.Y. (1984) Diatoms of the Shatt Al-Arab River Iraq. Nova Hedwigia, 39, 513-557.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Prescott, G.W. (1973) Algae of the Western Great Lake Area. William C. Brow Co. Publisher, Dubuque.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Germain, H. (1981) Flora des diatoms. Diatomophyceae eau douces et saumatres du massif. Armoricion et des contrees voisines d’ Europe occindental. Sciete Nouvelle des Editim Boubee, Paris.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Al-Handal</surname><given-names> A.Y. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1994</year>)<article-title>Contribution to the Knowledge of Diatoms of Sawa Lake, Iraq</article-title><source> Nova Hedwiia</source><volume> 59</volume>,<fpage> 225</fpage>-<lpage>254</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hassan, F.M., Hadi, R.W., Kassim, T.I. and Al-Hassany, J.S. (2012) Systematic Study of Epiphytic Algal after Restoration of Al-Hawizah Marshes, Southern of Iraq. International Journal of Aquatic Science, 3, 37-57.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Al-Hassany, J. and Hassan, F.M. (2014) Taxonomic Study of Some Epiphytic Diatoms on Aquatic Plants from Al-Hawizah Marshes, Southern of Iraq. Asian Journal of Natural &amp; Applied Sciences, 3, 1-11.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hassan, F.M. and Shaawiat, A.O. (2015) Qualitative and Quantitative Study of Phytoplankton (Diatoms) in a Lotic Ecosystem, Iraq. International Journal of Aquatic Science, 6, in press.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hassan, F.M., Taylor, W.D., Al-Taee, M.M.S. and Al-Fatlaw, H.J.J. (2010) Phytoplankton Composition of Euphrates River in Al-Hindiya Barrage and Kifil City Region of Iraq. Journal of Environmental Biology, 31, 343-350.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Almamoori, A.J., Hassan, F.M. and Kassim, T.I. (2012) Impact of Industrial Waste Water on the Properties of One Major Drainage in the Region of the Middle Euphrates/Iraq. International Journal of Chemical Sciences, 10, 1785-1798.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Hassan, F.M., Salman, J.M., Alkam, F.A. and Jawad, H.J. (2014) Ecological Observations on Epipelic Algae in Euphrates River at Hindiya and Manathira, Iraq. International Journal of Advanced Research, 2, 1183-1194.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Salman, J.M., Hassan, F.H., Hadi, S.J. and Motar, A.A. (2014) An Ecological Study of Epiphytic Algae on Two Aquatic Macrophytes in Lotic Ecosystem. Asian Journal of Natural &amp; Applied Sciences, 3, 37-52.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation publication-type="book" xlink:type="simple">Scott, D.A., Ed. (1995) A Directory of Wetlands in the Middle East. IUCN, Gland and IWRB, Slimbridge.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Wetzel, R.G. (2001) Limnology: Lake &amp; River Ecosystems. 3rd Edition, Academic Press (An Elsevier Science Imprint), San Francisco, New York, London, 429 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kuiper, J., Janse, J.H., Teurlinex, S., Verhoeven, J.T.A. and Alkemade, R. (2014) The Impact of River Regulation on the Biodiversity Intactness of Floodplain Wetlands. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 22, 647-658. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11273-014-9360-8</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ismail, A.M. and Hassan, F.H. (2007) Seasonal Variations of the Phytoplankton in Alwind River-Iraq. Iraq Journal of Aquatic, 2, 89-99.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">SWRCB (2002) Electrical Conductivity/Salinity Fact Sheet. In: The Clean Water Team Guidance Compendium for Watershed Monitoring and Assessment State Water Resources Control Board. http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/swamp/docs/cwt/guidance/3130en.pdf</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Manivanan, R. (2008) Water Quality Modeling: Rivers, Streams and Estuaries. New India Publishing, New Delhi, 305.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Hassan</surname><given-names> F.M. </given-names></name>,<etal>et al</etal>. (<year>1997</year>)<article-title>A Limnological Study on Hilla River</article-title><source> Al-Mustansiriya Journal of Science</source><volume> 8</volume>,<fpage> 22</fpage>-<lpage>30</lpage>.<pub-id pub-id-type="doi"></pub-id></mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Alobaidy, A.H.M., Abid, H.S. and Maulood, B.K. (2010) Application of Water Quality Index for Assessment of Dokan Lake Ecosystem, Kurdistan Region, Iraq. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 2, 792-798. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2010.29093</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Adakole, J.A., Balogun, J.K. and Haroon, A.K. (1984) Water Quality Impacts Assessment Associated with an Urban Stream in Zaria, Nigeria. NSEB, 2, 195-203.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Acs, E., Szabo, K., Toth, B. and Kiss, K.T. (2004) Investigation of Benthic Algal Communities Especially Diatoms of Some Hungarian Streams in Connection with Reference Conditions of the Water Framework Directives. Acta Botanica Hungarica, 46, 255-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/ABot.46.2004.3-4.1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Muylaert, K., Sanches-perez, M.J., Teissier, S.S., Dauta, A. and Rervier, P. (2009) Eutrophication and Effect on Dissolved Si Concentrations in the Garonne River (France). Journal of Limnology, 68, 368-374. http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2009.368</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Moonsyn, P., Peerapornpisal, Y., Swasdipan, N. and Pimmongkol, A. (2009) Benthic Diatoms Diversity and Water Quality in the Mekong River in the Vicinity of Ubon Ratchathani Province. Journal of Microscopy Society of Thailand, 23, 47-51.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Leelahakrie, K.P. and Peerapornpisal, Y. (2010) Diversity of Benthic Diatoms and Water Quality of the Ping River Northern Thailand. The International Journal Published by the Thai Society of High Education Institutes on Environment, EnvironmentAsia, 3, 82-94.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Tomas, W.E. (2007) The Role of Wave Disturbance on Lentic, Benthic Algae Community Structure and Diversity. M.Sc. Thesis, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Welch, E.B., Jacoby, J.M., Oener, R.R. and Seeley, M.R. (1988) Nuisance Biomass Levels of Periphytic Algae in Streams. Hydrobiologia, 157, 161-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00006968</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Dodds, W.K. (2006) Eutrophication and Trophic State in Rivers and Streams. Limnology and Oceanography, 51, 671-680. http://dx.doi.org/10.4319/lo.2006.51.1_part_2.0671</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Guts, J.J.M., Sarneel, J.M., Willers, B.J.C., Roelofs, J.G.M., Verhoeven, J.A. and Lamers, L.P.M. (2009) Interacting Effects of Sulphate Pollution, Sulphide Toxicity and Eutrophication on Vegetation Development in Fens: A Mesocosm Experiment. Environmental Pollution, 157, 2072-2081. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2009.02.024</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Krammer, K. and Lange-Bertalot, H. (1986) Bacillariophyceae. Teil 1. Naviculaceae. Suβwassweflora von Mitteleuropa, Bd. 2, berg. Von A. Pascher. Gustav Fisher Verlag, Stuttgart.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53807-ref50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Duong, T., Mazel, A., Coste, M., Dang, D. and Boudou, A. (2007) Dynamics of Diatom Colonization Process in Some Rivers Influenced by Urban Pollution (Hanoi, Vietnam). Ecological Indicators, 7, 839-851. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.10.003</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>