It is not always straightforward to distinguish vegetations from a cardiac mass on preoperative echocardiogram. We present a patient with complex congenital heart disease in whom preoperative echocardiogram suggested multiple vegetations over the tricuspid valve which were discovered to be accessory tricuspid valve tissue intraoperatively.

A 17 years old male presented with the complaints of bluish discoloration of tongue since early childhood and dyspnoea on exertion grade 2. He had history of one episode of high grade fever 3 months back for which he was hospitalized. On general physical examination he had cyanosis and there were no skin or mucosal stigmata of endocarditis. Cardiac examination revealed a silent precordium. Laboratory examination showed haemoglobin of 18.3 g/dL, leukocytosis (total leukocyte count 10,800/mm³) with neutrophilia (polymorphs 85%) and normal renal and liver function tests. On transthoracic echocardiogram [TTE] he was diagnosed to have Tetralogy of Fallot with subaortic ventricular septal defect [VSD] with right ventricular outflow tract obstruction [RVOTO]. In addition multiple large vegetations over tricuspid valve and a small vegetation over mitral valve without notable regurgitation or obstruction were seen. Because of presence of multiple vegetations cardiac catheterization was not done and patient was taken directly for surgery. Blood cultures performed pre-operatively were sterile. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR] and C-reactive protein [CRP] were within normal limits. Transoesophageal echocardiogram [TEE] performed preoperatively during surgery also revealed large vegetations over the tricuspid valve projecting into the right b ventricular outflow tract (Figures 1-3).

Intra operatively however to our surprise, no vegetations were seen either on the tricuspid valve or on the mitral valve, instead tricuspid valve was found to be redundant and myxomatous with multiple accessory leaflets without any evidence of infective vegetations (Figure 4). Infundibular bands were resected and ventricular septal defect was closed. The accessory leaflet was not excised for fear of causing tricuspid regurgitation. Pulmonary

valve was found to be normal. However, on coming off bypass the right ventricular pressure was found to be systemic. Patient was again placed on bypass and a right ventricular outflow tract incision was made. Through the incision it was obvious that the exuberant tricuspid valve tissue was causing RVOTO. A right ventricular outflow tract patch was placed which relieved the obstruction and patient was successfully weaned off cardio-pul- monary bypass with right ventricular to left ventricular pressure ratio of 0.5.

Patient had an uneventful post operative course and was weaned off from ventillatory support on post operative day 1 and was off ionotropes on post operative day 3. He was discharged from the hospital on 8th post operative day.

Accessory tricuspid valve leaflet is a rare finding. Only a few cases of accessory tricuspid valve have been reported unlike accessory mitral valve tissue which has been reported more frequently [1] . Accessory tricuspid valve leaflet is frequently associated with other congenital defects, such as tetralogy of fallot, transposition of the great arteries and ventricular septal defects [2] -[5] . Two types of accessory tricuspid valve have been defined: mobile and fixed [2] . The mobile type is a parachute like leaflet floating freely in the right ventricle via a long chordae. The fixed type is firmly anchored to the interventricular septum by short chordae. When associated with VSDs, both types can cause partial to near-complete obstruction of the VSD. Mobile-type accessory tricuspid valve can also cause RVOTO or even the left ventricle outflow tract obstruction by migrating through the VSD.

The diagnosis of accessory tricuspid valve leaflet may be suspected upon noninvasive imaging such as echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. However, definitive diagnosis is achieved by surgical excision and histopathologic analysis that shows marked thickening and fibrosis of the spongiosa layer. Differential diagnosis particularly includes papillary fibroelastoma [6] [7] and other cardiogenic tumors [8] . The diagnosis of papillary fibroelastoma is confirmed by a histopathologic examination showing vascular papillomas with a single layer of endocardial cells covering the papillary surface [6] .

There are no fixed guidelines for management of this anomaly but probably the accessory leaflet should be resected [2] [3] [9] [10] or a pericardial patch placed if it is causing left ventricular or right ventricular outflow tract obstruction as was observed in the present patient. Also that accessory tricuspid valve tissue should come as a differential diagnosis, if echocardiography shows a mobile mass attached to the tricuspid valve.