<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v3.0 20080202//EN" "http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/3.0/journalpublishing3.dtd"><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="3.0" xml:lang="en" article-type="research article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2327-4352</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Scientific Research Publishing</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/jamp.2015.32030</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JAMP-53680</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="Discipline-v2"><subject>Physics&amp;Mathematics</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>
 
 
  A Study of Design Optimization Using Response Surface Analysis and Fabricaiton MEMS Probe Tip
 
</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>K.</surname><given-names>B. Kim</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>J.</surname><given-names>W. Lee</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>S.</surname><given-names>J. Ha</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Y.</surname><given-names>K. Cho</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>M.</surname><given-names>W. Cho</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"><sup>*</sup></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff2"><addr-line>Division of Mechanical Engineering, Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea</addr-line></aff><aff id="aff1"><addr-line>Department of Mechanical Engineering, Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea</addr-line></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1">* E-mail:<email>chomwnet@inha.ac.kr(MWC)</email>;</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>01</month><year>2015</year></pub-date><volume>03</volume><issue>02</issue><fpage>201</fpage><lpage>207</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>17</day>	<month>December</month>	<year>2014</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>&#169; Copyright  2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. </copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><license><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><p>
 
 
   In semiconductor manufacturing process, probe station that is testing equipment is important. Inspection step is for detecting defects on semiconductor before the packaging. Probe card is a part of probe station and contains probe tip that contacts to semiconductor. Through probe tip, it can inspect defects of semiconductor. In this paper, optimization method is used with response surface analysis to design MEMS type probe tip. And fabricating probe tip uses maskless lithography, electro-plating and lapping process. 
 
</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>A Study of Design Optimization Using  Response Surface Analysis and Fabricaiton MEMS Probe Tip</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1"><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Recently, semiconductor technology develops to highly integrate and compact. So testing process for semiconductor is also developed [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53680-ref1">1</xref>]. Probe station is test equipment for chips on wafer, using probe tip involved in probe card for testing [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53680-ref2">2</xref>]. Probe card can be classified into cantilever, vertical and MEMS (Micro Electro Mechanical System) types [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53680-ref3">3</xref>]. In this paper, we design MEMS type probe tip using optimization method with response surface analysis and fabricate probe tip through maskless lithography, electro plating and lapping process.</p></sec><sec id="s2"><title>2. Probe Tip Design Optimization Using Response Surface Analysis</title><sec id="s2_1"><title>2.1. Probe Tip Design and Structure Analysis</title><p>For proper performance of probe tip, few conditions are needed. Not damage to semiconductor, enough displacement for contact with semiconductor, superb fatigability that is caused from repeat motion, and good electrical conductivity for transmit electrical ignal. Additional, probe tip is needed more than 2 gf contact force for stable contact with semiconductor [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53680-ref34">34</xref>].</p><p>In this paper, we fabricate probe tip as blade type that is used for FoC (Film on Chip). Set initial values using structure analysis for optimization with response surface analysis. We design probe tip as shown <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1"><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>1</xref>. The basic size of probe tip are L = 2.0 mm, W = 0.2 mm, T = 0.045 mm and progress structure analysis. We fabricate probe tip using electro plating with Nickel, so properties of probe tip that we made are different from general Nickel materials. From this reason, we measured properties of Nickel that made from electro plating and use these data for analysis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="scirp.53680-ref5">5</xref>]. The value of electro plating Nickel is shown as <xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref>.</p><p>Mesh and boundary condition of analysis is shown as <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2"><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>2</xref>. Fixed points are part that adhere to interposer and vertical displacement point is bottom of cantilever beam that contact with semiconductor. Under these conditions, we confirm stress distribution of probe tip cause from vertical over drive. Structure analysis mesh is 50 um tetrahedrons mesh</p><p>Form the result of structure analysis, maximum stress occur at the point that is linked with main body of probe tip and maximum strength is 751.48 MPa. This value is under the yield strength of Nickel, so probe tip that we design is suitable. But we cannot assure this design is best, so progress optimization of probe tip using response surface analysis.</p><fig-group id="fig1"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1"><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>1</xref></label><caption><title><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>and mesh of probe tip.</title></caption><fig id ="fig1_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/53680x3.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig-group id="fig2"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig2"><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>2</xref></label><caption><title>Result of equivalent stress of probe tip.</title></caption><fig id ="fig2_1"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/53680x4.png"/></fig></fig-group></sec><sec id="s2_2"><title>2.2. Design Optimization of Probe Tip</title><p>For design optimization use analysis software Ansys 14.5. Design variables range are length 2.0 - 2.5 mm, width 0.15 - 0.20 mm, thickness 0.045 - 0.050 mm, over drive 100 um displacement as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref>. Use two boundary conditions for optimization minimum contact force 2 gf and yield strength of nickel 860 Mpa.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>3 are results of response surface analysis stress and contact force by length, width and thickness. First, in case of stress, as over drive increase, length, width and thickness are also increased (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>4). As length increase, stress is decreased and the width is boarder, the stress is bigger. But as thickness increase, stress is decreased till 0.0475 mm and after that point stress is increased.</p><fig-group id="fig3"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>3</label><caption><title> Results of equivalent stress of parameters. (a) Stress by length; (b) Stress by width; (c) Stress by thickness.</title></caption><fig id ="fig3_1"><label>(b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/53680x5.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig3_2"><label> (c)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/53680x6.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig3_3"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/53680x7.png"/></fig></fig-group><table-wrap id="table1" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table1">Table 1</xref></label><caption><title> Material properties of nickel</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Density</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Modulus of Elasticity</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Tensile Strength</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Poisson’s Ratio</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >8.90 g/cm<sup>3</sup></td><td align="center" valign="middle" >169 Gpa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >882.7 Mpa</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.31</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><table-wrap id="table2" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table2">Table 2</xref></label><caption><title> Range of design parameters</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" >Length</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Width</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Thickness</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Over Drive</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >2.0 - 2.5 mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.15 - 0.20 mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.045 - 0.055 mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.05 - 0.100 mm</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Second, in case of contact force, over drive increase, length, width and thickness are also increased. In each case, contact force increase when length is shorter, width is boarder and thickness is thicker. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>5 shows influence of each variables to stress and contact force and priority of influence of variables is over drive &gt; width &gt; length &gt; thickness. This tendency is similar to case of cantilever beam in material mechanics.</p><p><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref> is 3 optimum condition cases that are drawn using response surface analysis and through this tendency, confirm fabrication possibility of probe tip.</p></sec></sec><sec id="s3"><title>3. Fabrication of Probe Tip</title><p>Probe tip fabrication process is as shown <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>6. First, PR (Photo Resist, AZ4620) coating on Al plate with thickness 50 um and making a pattern that use maskless lithography system. Next, remove pattern that made by lithography with developing process and nickel plating on Al plate with the way of electro plating. After electro plating, lapping the nickel. Through this process thickness of nickel is 49 um. And using etching process to divide probe tip with Al plate.</p><p>Maskless lithography system that is used for fabricating probe tip is DMD type and exposure UV light source on pattern image. Image format is Bitmap Through this system, we fabricate blade probe tip type patterns.</p><p><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>7 is shown surface roughness of nickel before and after lapping. Surface roughness values at before lapping are Ra = 0.3915 um, Rt = 2.6409 um and at after lapping are Ra 0.0822 um, Rt = 0.6544. From these results, we can confirm improvement of surface roughness through lapping.</p><fig-group id="fig4"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>4</label><caption><title> Results contact force of parameters. (a) Contact force by length; (b) Contact force by width; (c) Contact force by thickness.</title></caption><fig id ="fig4_1"><label>(b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/53680x8.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_2"><label> (c)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/53680x9.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig4_3"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/53680x10.png"/></fig></fig-group><fig id="fig5"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>5</label><caption><title> Influence of parameters to stress and contact force</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/53680x11.png"/></fig><fig id="fig6"  position="float"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>6</label><caption><title> Fabrication process of probe tip</title></caption><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/53680x12.png"/></fig><fig-group id="fig7"><label><xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig">Figure </xref>7</label><caption><title> Surface roughness on nickel.</title></caption><fig id ="fig7_1"><label>(b)</label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/53680x13.png"/></fig><fig id ="fig7_2"><label></label><graphic mimetype="image"   position="float"  xlink:type="simple"  xlink:href="http://html.scirp.org/file/53680x14.png"/></fig></fig-group><table-wrap id="table3" ><label><xref ref-type="table" rid="table3">Table 3</xref></label><caption><title> Case of optimization result</title></caption><table><tbody><thead><tr><th align="center" valign="middle" ></th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Over drive</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Length</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Width</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Thickness</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Stress</th><th align="center" valign="middle" >Reaction force</th></tr></thead><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Unit</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="4"  >mm</td><td align="center" valign="middle"  colspan="2"  >gf</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Case. 1</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.089</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.93</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.22</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0492</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >859.0</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >12.26</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Case. 2</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.077</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.94</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.24</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0494</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >834.8</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.91</td></tr><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" >Case. 3</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.097</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >1.99</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.21</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >0.0494</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >842.5</td><td align="center" valign="middle" >11.64</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec id="s4"><title>4. Conclusions</title><p>In this paper, we fabricate probe tip that is used at test process to semiconductor. Optimization method using response surface analysis is used for design of probe tip and fabricate processes are used for electro-plating and maskless lithography system. Through this paper, we can confirm possibility of applying to probe tip. The paper contents are as follows.</p><p>1) Fabricate nickel thin film with electro-plating used for probe tip fabrication.</p><p>2) We confirm properties of the electro-plating nickel like hardness, modulus and yield strength. The yield strength value is 882.7 Mpa.</p><p>3) Through characterization of nickel that is fabricated using electro plating, it differs from general nickel properties. So we use properties of nickel using electro-plating that we measure.</p><p>4) To fabricate probe tip, use maskless lithography system through exposure probe tip figure pattern on photoresist.</p><p>5) Through lapping process, adjust thickness of probe tip and improve surface condition. Also, lapping occurs on micro-work hardening on nickel.</p></sec><sec id="s5"><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by Small and Medium Business Administration of Korea (S2085274).</p></sec><sec id="s6"><title>Cite this paper</title><p>K. B. Kim,J. W. Lee,S. J. Ha,Y. K. Cho,M. W. Cho, (2015) A Study of Design Optimization Using Response Surface Analysis and Fabricaiton MEMS Probe Tip. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics,03,201-207. doi: 10.4236/jamp.2015.32030</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="scirp.53680-ref1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Ha, S.J., Kim, D.W., Shin, B.C., Cho, M.W. and Han, C.S. (2010) Assessment of Design and Mechanical Characteristics of MEMS Probe Tip with Fine Pitch. Journal of Academia-Industrial Technology, 11, 1210-1215.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53680-ref2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Leslie, B. and Matta, F. (1989) Wafer-Level Testing with a Membrane Probe. IEEE Design &amp; Test of Computers, 6, 10-17.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53680-ref3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Min, C.H. (2007) Fabrication of Vertical Type Probe Card and MEMS Probe Card for Wafer Level Chip Test. Catholic University.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53680-ref4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kendall, D.L. (1975) On Etching Very Narrow Grooves in Silicon. Appl. Phys. Lett., 26, 195-198. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.88113</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="scirp.53680-ref5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other" xlink:type="simple">Kim, I.G. (2004) Study on the Hardness and Internal Stress of Nickel Electro-deposit. Industrial of Telecommunication Information, 47-56.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>