Basing us in still valid writings of renowned neuro-psychiatrists of the past century [1] [2] , we postulated nearly fifteen years ago an innovative psychiatric hypothesis in which we proposed the epileptic nature of many psychiatric symptoms [3] [4] . In these previous writings, we said that productive and/or positive psychic manifestations should be interpreted as expression of simple partial seizures (SPSs) when they appeared in the next way: suddenly the attention focused completely on the sole psychic event occurring in mind at this moment. This phenomenon is always experienced with the same phenomenological features: distortion of inner time, automatic character, great intensity, and strong feeling of strangeness. We have been investigating the epileptic origin of these experiences along these years, and recently we proposed to term them Hipersyncronic Mental Automatisms (HMAs) [5] .

The best way to understand these phenomena is by means of an example of a HMA which occurs so frequently among the normal population that many of us will surely have experienced it. We are referring to déjà vu, “a paroxysmal feeling of familiarity which can be found in no less than half the normal population, but which just as easily can be conceived as a partial seizure” ( [6] , p. 103). Well, this paramnesia contains the five features which we have described just above as defining a HMA: sudden focusing of attention, distorted inner time, completely passively received (automatic), very intense, and charged with an incomprehensible strangeness.

Psychiatric practice recognizes a great variety of psychic phenomena with these clinical characteristics, and in light of their frequency and content, the following list of HMAs may be drawn up:

1) Perceptive automatisms: These are hallucinatory phenomena that impose themselves on the consciousness with undeniable conviction of truth.

2) Cognitive automatisms:

a) Primary delusional ideas [7] , where a sudden though that entails always the impression of irrefutable certainty.

b) Depersonalization: the subject suddenly has the vivid impression of observing himself as wholly or partially different from normal, despite knowing that the sense organs are working properly.

c) Derealization: this is similar to depersonalization, but now it is the environment, not the self; that is suddenly changed.

3) Affective automatisms:

a) Panic attack, that is, an acute assault of anguish and terror taking over the consciousness with such sudden intensity that the subject has the impression that he is losing the control of his mind.

b) Sadness attack: here the unexpected experience consists of a sudden psychic pain invading the awareness completely and for no apparent reason, the sorrow being inexplicable for the subject suffering it.

c) Joy attack: the opposite of the above. It is a state of intense bliss with no apparent cause, which takes over consciousness passively.

d) Alternative acute attacks of these two opposite affective experiences that mimic a quick cycling bipolar disorder.

So far, these psychic productions have constituted a grey area between psychiatry and neurology, sometimes being diagnosed as SPSs when there is a concordant EEG and more frequently as symptoms of different psychiatric disorders. Indeed, hallucinations and primary delusional ideas are two of the characteristic symptoms of acute psychoses, more specifically of an acute state of paranoid schizophrenia and/or schizophrenia-like psychosis, and are commonly diagnosed as such. In turn, depersonalization and derealization are the characteristic symptoms of depersonalization disorder. Panic attacks are regularly diagnosed as panic disorder. Painful experiences are often interpreted as symptoms of a melancholic depression, while the opposite joyful experiences are included in the manic phase of bipolar disorder. Finally, automatically alternating experiences of joy and suffering are usually diagnosed as rapid cycling bipolar disorder.

Now, when we proposed for the first time that these psychic manifestations were SPSs [3] , such interpretation was in direct conflict with the conviction widely held in psychiatry that psychotropic drugs used to treat them had a proconvulsant action. Indeed, the most handbooks of psychiatry in force at that time warmed that psychopharmacological drugs favored neuronal convulsiveness and therefore could not be administered to epileptic patients, or could only be employed with great care [8] . This was especially true for lithium [9] , for tricyclic antidepressants [10] , but also was applied to SSRIs [11] .

Consequently, it was very difficult to find at that time psychopharmacological bibliography by means of which sustained our hypothesis. But along recent years, there have appeared numerous scientific papers defending the anticonvulsant effect of most of these substances and, hence, supporting our proposition. Thus, we will do the consequent scientific researches about this topic.

The five main families of psychotropic drugs used to suppress AMHs are benzodiazepines, mood stabilizers, SSRIs, dual antidepressants (DAs), and antipsychotics (APs). The anticonvulsant role of benzodiazepines is recognized by all neuroscientific community, so there is not problem with this group of drugs. Similarly, the anticonvulsant effect of mood stabilizers is unquestioned since they all, except lithium, are anticonvulsant drugs by definition. So, the problem arises with lithium, SSRIs, tricyclic antidepressants (TaDs), modern DAs, and APs that are the supposedly proconvulsant substances.

In an attempt to throw light on this question, we have looked for information on the action actually played by these substances on neuronal transmission. The database employed was PubMed, using advance search, for following terms: anticonvulsant, antiepileptic drugs (AEPs), APs, atypical APs, citalopram, clomipramine, modern DAs, fluoxetine, imipramine, lithium, neuroleptics, proconvulsant, serotonin, sertraline, SSRIs and TCAs.

Before to detail the specific findings of our researches for every one of drugs above listed, we consider necessary to establish some general considerations about the results:

1) Firstly, the information used for many year ago to justify their proconvulsant role came from studies of doubtful scientific value [12] , mainly for two reasons: many times the proconvulsant action was inferred from investigations carried out with animal models, in which the doses employed was much higher that these ones used in psychiatric clinical practice [13] ; on the other hand, the studies in humans did not take in account the strong inherited propensity to epilepsy of people included in such investigations [14] .

2) Secondly, the results are not only conclusive but even confuse with some authors defending interchangeably the anticonvulsant and proconvulsant action of these drugs.

One these clarifications made, we will group all information found supporting our hypothesis into the following sections: 1) anticonvulsant effect of lithium; 2) anticonvulsant effect of SSRIs; 3) anticonvulsant effect of DAs; 4) anticonvulsant effect of APs.

When it comes to evaluating these results, it is necessary to emphasize a striking fact that we have found in many of the investigations consulted: numerous pieces of information are confusing and even contradictory, with authors defending both the proconvulsant and anticonvulsant role of certain psychotropic drugs at the same time, for example depending on the doses. We think that this confuse and opposite information could be explained to a large extent if we take into account the probable existence of two different and antagonistic kinds of epileptic activities [49] - [51] . Wilson and Bragdon [52] allude to these opposite epileptic activities in the next terms:

These data suggest a possible new principle for the relationship between epileptic form bursts and electrographic seizures, namely, that they can arise in separate, mutually interactive, locations. Moreover, although epileptic bursts can trigger electrographic seizures, their main effect may be to suppress seizures arising in their target areas. Thus, interictal spikes in humans may have a suppressive effect on seizure discharge (p. 380).

Probably this opposite effect of epileptic burst and electrographic seizures is mediated by simultaneous activation of postsynaptic AMPA and NMDA receptors, which elicit complex and even opposing responses [53] .

The existence of two opposing opposed epileptiogenic activities helps us to understand the contradictions above mentioned. Furthermore, split of epileptic activity in two different types offer us a natural explanation clarification of the contradictory relationship between epilepsy and psychoses, a paradox that Starr [54] summarizes in the next terms:

One of the great unresolved medical controversies of the twentieth century concerns the relationship between epilepsy and psychosis. Limbic structures are suspected of being intimately involved in the pathophysiology of both of these neurological conditions, yet more than a century medical thinkers have failed to agree upon whether these two common disorders are closely associated, unrelated, or mutually antagonistic to one another (p. 160).

Indeed, on one hand, it is an undeniable fact the high comorbidity of epilepsy and psychoses. On the other hand, these two activities are incompatible simultaneously, as we can easily deduce from the next three facts:

1) The phenomenon termed “forced normalization” [55] .

2) The often clinical observation that a generalized seizure terminates a state of acute psychosis [56] .

3) The still effective treatment of psychoses with electro-convulsive therapy after eighty year of use [57] .

This enigmatic information on the relationship of epilepsy and psychoses is naturally explained by our hypothesis. Indeed epilepsy is to hyperia what firefighter’s water is to fire of a conflagration: both them frequently appear together but they antagonistic and even incompatible at the same time.

Finally, our proposal about the anticonvulsant effect of psychopharmacological drugs would make it possible to offer a comprehensible explanation to why AEDs are proving useful in an ever-growing number of psychiatric applications: for several decades they have been used as mood regulators to prevent relapses of bipolar disorder, while more and more scientific studies postulate their value to treat different psychiatric disorders such as anxiety [58] , positive syndrome of schizophrenia and schizophrenic-like psychoses [59] , but remarkably bipolar disorder [60] , which not only responds to AEDs but even seems to share etiologic and pathogenic mechanisms with epilepsy [61] .

There are abundant evidences suggesting that most psychopharmacological drugs can act as anticonvulsant, a fact that contributes to a better comprehension of paradoxical relationship between epilepsy and psychoses. It is necessary to carry out further studies to elucidate the role of each and every one of these substances on neuronal transmission.

The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.